28 YEARS LATER: THE BONE TEMPLE – Review

Whew, now that is a really quick turnaround for a sequel (they way it sprinted to theatres in just a little over six months, you’d think that it had contracted the “rage”). Usually there’s at least a year between franchise entries, even if they were shot at the same time as the WICKED flicks or even more, like the last two “impossible missions” (who knows if or when we’ll have to endure the conclusion to FAST X). Then, this isn’t your usual “tent pole”, since the original sprinted out in 2002, its first sequel in 2007, then the follow-up last June. That installment was both a box office and critical hit, so a different director and much of the same cast are hoping that audiences will be eager to get out of the January chills and warm themselves by the fiery furnaces of 28 YEARS LATER: THE BONE TEMPLE.


When we last saw the preteen loner Spike (Alfie Williams), he was saved from a rage-infected pack by a group of track-suit wearing, platinum-haired young men and women. But as we see in the opening sequence, Spike might have gone from the “frying pan into the fire”, as he must face off against an older young man as his “initiation” into the group called “the Jimmies”. Watching over the duel is their leader, Sir Jimmy Crystal (Jack O’Connell), in his thirties, making him a veteran of the “plague” world. He “fancies” himself to be the son of “ole’ Nick” AKA Satan. Somehow, Spike triumphs, is dubbed the newest “Jimmy”, and is forced to join them in deadly attacks on human survivors on the mainland, encounters that end with Sir Jimmy orchestrating acts of barbaric cruelty. Meanwhile, Dr. Ian Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) is still tending to the title “Bone Temple”, or “memento mori” dedicated to the dead, the bone towers flanking a massive spire of human skulls. Kelson’s daily routine is broken up by visits (more like roaring attacks) from the hulking “alpha” of the infected, whom he dubs “Samson” (Chi Lewis-Parry). Those encounters turn into a game as Kelson waits until the giant is nearly upon him before using a long tube to blow a dart full of his special sedative, that renders Samson docile. The doctor soon comes to the conclusion that Samson actually welcomes the “rest” and often joins him for a brief “nap”. Kelson then begins to experiment on Samson and somehow is able to counteract the “rage”. However, his research may soon be disrupted when he and his sanctuary are discovered by the Jimmies. What happens when the worlds of these survivors clash? Who will claim the land, Sir Jimmy, Dr. Kelson, or perhaps Samson?

Probably the greatest performance from the last entry was from the gifted Fiennes as the somewhat still sane medical man, somehow learning to adapt to the hellscape of the plague -ridden countryside. Here he actually builds on that work (last time we didn’t meet him until well past the halfway mark), adding some new “layers” to this lonely soul. He shows us that Kelson is yearning for a real human connection, even if it’s with a “zonked out” behemoth. Plus, we get to see a bit of his eccentric side, as his main joy comes from his love of his 80s pop records. Fiennes captures our attention in every one of his scenes (he’s got a long overdue date with Oscar). His character’s “inverse” may be the charismatic O’Connell as the cunning, cruel, and still a bit charming Sir Jimmy. He may be the “wildest card” in the twisted pack of Jimmies, who has a teen idol’s swagger while putting a Manson-like spell on his faithful followers. After his splendid work last year as the “boss vamp” in SINNERS, O’Connell is quite the engaging movie monster. Williams commands our interests and elicits our sympathies as Spike, still a boy, as he tries to survive this world and his still painful family loss. Luckily, he’s got a caring surrogate “big sis” in the enigmatic Erin Kellyman as “Jimmy Ink”, the gang’s “enforcer” who has freed herself from the “cult” of Sir Jimmy. Kudos also to the compelling physical presence of Lewis-Parry who gives some unexpected vulnerability, showing us that like the Frankenstein monster, he could have his cloudy savagery cleansed by a bit of kindness.

Earlier I mentioned that this installment boasts a different director. Taking the reins from Danny Boyle is the versatile, visually elegant Nia DaCosta (after last year’s “chamber drama” HEDDA). She clues us in, with the searing brutality of “Spike’s test” that this second act of a planned final trilogy, won’t dance around its violent, visceral origins. In other words, the blood does flow, like a red storm over the gorgeous green English countryside. The screenwriter of last June’s entry, Alex Garland, does return with a tale that echoes several horror survival themes, showing us how the uninfected humans can be more deadly than the screaming charging hordes. We’re even given an “origin story” set at the beginning s of the “rage”, reminding us that these mindless monsters were exactly like us. What really surprised me this time was the unexpected bursts of very dark, nearly pitch black, humor, especially in the final showdown. Ah, but it’s not really “final” as an epilogue promises another glorious glimpse into this altered Earth. Let’s hope our next visit, probably not a quick seven months wait, will be as well produced and as full of conflict and compassion as 28 YEARS LATER: THE BONE TEMPLE.

3.5 Out of 4

28 YEARS LATER: THE BONE TEMPLE opens in theaters everywhere on Thursday, January 15, 2026

MONEY MONSTER – Review

moneymonster2

MONEY MONSTER has all the ingredients of a timely thriller: an explosive hostage situation, a critique of our current economic system, and major movie stars in the form of George Clooney and Julia Roberts. However, what unfolds onscreen is a simplistic and obvious expose about the manipulative power of both Wall Street and the media that by now is so familiar that its cynical perspective is unlikely to upset or provoke anyone. Perhaps a decade or two ago MONEY MONSTER would have been a compelling film experience but in this day and age it’s just picking obvious targets.

MONEY MONSTER stars Julia Roberts as Patty Fenn, a TV producer who spends the entire film in a control room full of consoles, monitors and engineers. Down on the studio floor Clooney plays Lee Gates, the hyperactive host of a show called Money Monster (based not-so-loosely on Jim Cramer’s CNN Mad Money show). Lee offers financial guidance and stock recommendations while behaving like a madman, hip-hopping with dancing girls and illustrating the treacherous labyrinth of Wall Street trading by running clips of Joan Crawford in STRAIGHT-JACKET. During a live broadcast Kyle Budwell (Jack O’Connell), a disgruntled working-class type, sneaks into the studio. He’s armed with a pistol, an explosives-packed vest he straps to Lee, and a list of demands. Kyle’s upset that he took advice from this TV host and lost his life savings. It’s a siege on live TV, and Patty, who can speak to Lee through a tiny earpiece that Kyle is unaware of, takes control. She not only continues to direct the situation, she fingers Walt Camby (Dominic West), a corrupt CEO, as the one who manipulated the financial crisis that screwed Kyle.

Directed by Jodie Foster, MONEY MONSTER is told in real time, which help its 95 minutes zip by but the film, obviously striving for a DOG DAY AFTERNOON-style atmosphere of anarchy and pandemonium, fails as both black comedy and drama. Foster’s attempt at a potent finale is embarrassingly heavy-handed as Kyle and Lee (still wearing his bomb vest) march down a busy Manhattan street while the crowds line up on the sidewalk to cheer them on. We’re supposed to believe the cops are going to let this armed and unhinged man have a sit down to confront evil Walt Camby a few blocks away from the TV station. MONEY MONSTER has nothing new to add to the many hostage films that Hollywood has given us over the years. The problem is that it’s revelations are never quite as shocking as the self-important screenplay, one that favors message over plausibility, holds them out to be. The assertion that the little guy can get bamboozled and that television panders to sensationalism is obvious to anyone who has merely glanced at cable news or their bank statement in the last eight years. I guess the audience is expected to sympathize with Kyle’s dilemma and his anger; you’d be hard put to find anyone who wouldn’t. But this man, who in a better movie might be drawn as a decent but deeply flawed and disturbed person, is shoved down our throats as a hero. MONEY MONSTER comes awfully close to saying that the answer to a personal grievance is, well, terrorism, when you get right down to it. My empathy for someone who loses the farm based on what some clown on cable TV says is limited. The acting by the stars is no more than adequate. Clooney acquits himself honorably in a part that’s not particularly challenging. It’s an indication of the script’s limitations that even a resourceful actor like Clooney has a hard time nailing down a character unlike one he’s played so many times before. Julia Roberts does little but furrow her brow and bark orders. Apparently she was never actually with Clooney on the set (except for an early scene and one at the end), and it shows as she never really seems to be in the same location as the action. British actor Jack O’Connell is intense enough, but his working class Noo Yauk accent, while consistent, is unconvincing. There is one great scene and performance in MONEY MONSTER and it doesn’t involve any of these three stars. Emily Meade shows up halfway through as Molly, Kyle’s pregnant girlfriend who is dragged into the studio supposedly to negotiate with her husband on behalf of the police, but instead of teary pleading, she goes off on him, cussing and screaming about what a loser he is before her mic is quickly yanked. It’s an uproarious moment, the only time the film goes in an unexpected direction and with this one sequence Ms Meade manages to steal the film from its cast of megastars. MONEY MONSTER is a wanna-be movie event that simply reinvents the wheel.

2 of 5 Stars

Money-Monster-Poster-2