Charlize Theron in a Ninja CROSSFIRE

Maaaajor Girlpower from Best Actress Oscar Winner Charlize Theron (MONSTER) as she battles ninjas and saves the day, and Brandon Flowers, in this kickin’ music video for ‘Crossfire.’ Truth be told, I’m really more interested in her performance in the video than the cutesy song. Doesn’t this seems like a great preview for Theron’s 2012 MAD MAX: FURY ROAD? According to some reports, George Miller’s sequel begins shooting in Australia in February 2011.

Music video by Brandon Flowers performing Crossfire. (C) 2010 The Island Def Jam Music Group

Review: THE ROAD

the road

Underneath the grit, grime, grey skies, and melancholy of THE ROAD, there is a heart to it, an overpowering optimism that stems from the energy a father gives in the love for his son.  It is a hard world the father and son in this film live in, and, many times, it seems the end has come.  You believe those moments, and it all stems from the power given by the film’s director and the actors involved.

THE ROAD tells an incredible story put to paper by Cormac McCarthy, the author who also gave us NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN.  The titles and the stories they convey are interchangeable.  Every character in THE ROAD is an old man in one form or another.  They have each lived a long time in a world that has moved on and, seemingly, forgotten them.  McCarthy’s novel, THE ROAD, is a masterpiece, and, for the most part, the film based on it, directed by THE PROPOSITION helmer John Hillcoat, keeps in step with its source material.  There are faults here and there, and, unfortunately, they are noticeable.  However, in the end, the film is a grand depiction of a barren world and the fire within all of us to keep living if not for ourselves then for those who depend on us.

Viggo Mortensen plays the father.  Kodi Smit-McPhee of the upcoming LET THE RIGHT ONE IN remake plays his son.  They travel across a post-apocalyptic America towards the coast, hoping to find some kind of salvation to the South.  The conditions of the world have been caused by some, unseen event, and we get snippets of life right after the cataclysm in scattered flash-backs.  The father and son move through their day-to-day lives, trying to survive the environment (periodic earthquakes let them know just much alive the planet still is), starvation and scurried band of  cannibals  that have long-since given up on the civil ways the world used to be.

Hillcoat’s recreation of the world McCarthy’s created in his novel is staggering, a triumph of desolation and earthy apocalypse.  It is a cliché  to say about a film with so much style that every shot could be a painting hung on the wall.  It doesn’t make it any less true in the case of THE ROAD, a film so full of directorial style, it completely transfixes you away from how little happens in the film in terms of action.  It isn’t a lie to refer to THE ROAD as an “edge of your seat” film, but the tension is derived from the quiet moments, the periods where you think all is well and the characters you have come to know are safe for the time being.

Though Hillcoat’s style and the way he perfectly captures the cold of the world (both in a literal and figurative sense), there are chinks in Hillcoat’s directing armor here.  I’m not sure how deliberate it is, but the sense of direction is all off here.  The lacking in the sense of time is, probably, deliberate.  It’s easy to grasp how long the world has been the way it is based on the age of the boy, but we aren’t supposed to know how long events surrounding the father and son take.  When they come across an underground bunker full of food, we aren’t really supposed to know how long they stay before deciding it is too dangerous.  That element of the film is just an understanding in the way of this world.

However, we never really know where in the world we are.  For a majority of the film, I was believing they were on the West coast working their way towards the Pacific coast.  Late in the film, we are shown a map telling us they are, in fact, on the East coast working towards the Atlantic coastline.  Hillcoat never gives us any sense of this before this scene.  In fact, there is no rhyme or reason as to the direction the characters are moving in any, given scene.  Sometimes they are moving towards screen right.  Other times, they are moving towards screen left.  When you stand back and look at it, this is a minor flaw in things.  Unfortunately, it is quite a noticeable one, and it never fails in creating some bit of distraction from the story at hand.

One thing to help in this distraction, though, is how marvelous the performances are from everyone in the film, Mortensen in particular who ends up doing the best work of his career.  He makes a believer out of you as to the love he gives his son, and you can almost tell just from the performance that Mortensen has children of his own.  There are both scenes where Mortensen has to break down at the hardships he and his son are going through and scenes where he must become a harder man, a  defender  against the dangers slowly seeping in.  I wouldn’t say Mortensen carries the film, because Smit-McPhee gives a performance that is just as gripping and substantial as Mortensen’s.  These two actors together provide such a powerhouse of emotions that their performances alone make THE ROAD an emotionally challenging film.

Other notable roles come from Charlize Theron as the wife/mother of the pair, only seen in the flashbacks, and Robert Duvall and Guy Pearce as two men who the boy and his father meet in their journey.  Everyone, even the always mentionable Garret Dillahunt as a member of a gang, does a superb job making the world of THE ROAD even that much more realistic.

Mention should also be given to both Nick Cave and Warren Ellis, who have crafted a musical score for THE ROAD that is just as moving as the work they did for THE PROPOSITION and THE ASSASSINATION OF JESSE JAMES BY THE COWARD ROBERT FORD.  Their music is melancholy, almost depressing at times, but it, too, instills a sense of hope and an element of direction towards something greater.

It is strange to call a film like THE ROAD beautiful, a word that doesn’t, in and of itself, give a sense of the dour and dejected world shown here.  It is a beautiful film, and it is because of the optimism Hillcoat and screenwriter Joe Penhall took from McCarthy’s novel.  The original novel is a masterpiece, a triumph of survival and idealism as shown in a stark world.  Hillcoat’s film doesn’t quite reach that same level of craftsmanship.  Much of this comes from how forced everything seems to be in order to get everything into a two-hour film, and even more of this stems from Hillcoat’s diverting usage of direction.  Nonetheless, THE ROAD is a powerful film.  Though it is a hard one to travel, it is well worth the effort.

MAD MAX 4: FURY ROAD Moving Quickly

mad max

I do mean “quickly” both literally and figuratively, as it was announced on Saturday in Australia’s The Daily Telegraph that pre-production on George Miller’s fourth installment in the MAD MAX series had begun.  Word came down  last week as to who Miller himself saw in the lead roles (thumbs up for Tom Hardy, thumbs in the I-don’t-know for Charlize).  Rumors come up in the Telegraph that redux go-to guy Sam Worthington is up for the lead role.  Hardy would be better, but I understand the box office draw Worthington is slowly amassing.

While much of the Telegraph article is about how the new MAD MAX film will bring much to the Australian economy, it does touch on some of the technical aspects on the film.  For one, it is revealed the film will have 30 weeks worth of production.  With most films generally taking 2-3 months to shoot, this amount of production time is insane, and reveals some of what Miller’s scope for the film will be.  The whole project is expected to take 2 1/2 years to complete, so look for a Summer 2012 release date.

Premier of New South Wales, Nathan Rees, had this to say:

The Mad Max films are iconic.  In the hands of director George Miller, we will see one of the largest and most ambitious live action films ever made in Australia. This is a clear vote of confidence in Australian expertise. This proves that Sydney is an international contender for major film production.

Granted, Rees is a Premier whose ties to the film are strictly political, but him saying “live action” in that quote pretty much puts to bed any ideas Miller had about shooting this animated-style as was believed was to be the style of the film a few years back.

In addition to the Telegraph’s article about pre-production beginning, we also have this clip courtesy of Australia’s ABC News.  It features Miller introducing some of the cars that are to be used in MAD MAX 4, and it has Miller expounding on some of those casting rumors.

Review: ASTRO BOY

astroboymovie

ASTRO BOY is the moderately anticipated new CGI-animated adventure hitting theaters, based on the 1952 Japanese manga series created by Osama Tezuka, which was followed by a television series beginning in 1963. This new film was helmed by David Bowers, which is his second directorial outing after FLUSHED AWAY in 2006.

The film tells the story of a brilliant young boy, the prodigal son of scientist Dr. Tenma (Nicolas Cage) who is developing a powerful new infinitely renewable source of clean energy recovered from a fallen comet. Naturally, his groundbreaking research is funded by the military and now they want to integrate this new power into powerful weapons.

In a tragic accident, Dr. Tenma’s son is killed, leading him to use this incredible power to recreate his son as the ultimate robot, equipped with endless defensive abilities to keep him safe. The robot has his son’s memory, but not the realization of his true self until he discovers his powers and becomes Astro Boy (Freddy Highmore). Now, as Uncle Ben would say… “with great power comes great responsibility”… Astro Boy uses his powers to save the futuristic, floating Metro City from an ego-maniacal President driven to get re-elected at any cost.

ASTRO BOY is a fun little movie, but it’s primarily targeted at younger audiences… much younger. Even kids around the age of ten may find the film a bit young for them, but for kids in general it’s rather enjoyable. The story is decent, has some good messages to it and holds together fairly well. The dialogue and the humor is where much of the youthful intention emerges.

The voice cast features a respectable line-up, including Kristen Bell, Bill Nighy, Donald Sutherland, Eugene Levy, Nathan Lane and even Samuel L. Jackson. Nicolas Cage does a decent job, but I did find myself pulled out of the story whenever he spoke, unlike the rest of the cast. He just has one of those unavoidably recognizable voices. Sam Jackson, on the other hand, managed to slip past my recognition until the end credits.

Visually, ASTRO BOY looks great! The animation is sharp and stylishly simplified. The colors pop and the action is high-speed and energetic. The movie is going to appeal to boys for sure, filled with rocket boot flight on several occasions, arm cannons and all sorts of other miscellaneous weapons produced both by Astro Boy and his enemies. Girls may also enjoy the relative cuteness of the film and Astro Boy’s human friends he develops along the way.

The ending felt a bit tacked on and forced… OK, it IS tacked on and forced, clearly meant to setup the potential sequel. Kids will likely enjoy the movie. How much so will likely be a direct result of how young they are. Adults likely won’t be blown away, but if you find yourselves chaperoning young ones to this film, fear not. Boredom is unlikely.

We asked some of ASTRO BOY’s target audience what they though of the film:

astroboys

Teddy: Great for 7 years old and older… best scenes were the action ones.

Ben: Great family film. Five star funny. I loved the flying scene and technology. I would tell my friends to go see it.

Jake (Tech Guy): I thought it was very hi-tech with touch screen computers. I really loved the movie.

Sean: I liked all the flying. Funniest part was when Toby/Astro Boy realizes that “I have machines guns? In my butt?”

MAD MAX 4 Could Have Aeon Flux and Charles Bronson?

mad max

Not quite sure if this is the “maximum force of the future” the first MAD MAX’s tagline was telling us about, but it sure is an eye-opening.  According to E Online!, George Miller has his gaze on a couple of actors to fill the lead roles in his long-gestating MAD MAX 4.  For the female lead, he’s looking at Charlize Theron.  For the role of “Mad” Max Rockatansky, he’s set his sights on Tom Hardy.

Now, before you start flinging monkey feces at this piece of news, realize first and foremost that this is Miller’s appetite may be making checks that, for all we know, his hide can’t cash.  MAD MAX 4 is a long way off, it has been for many years.  This time next year, with no new news coming our way, we could be hearing about two, new lead role possibilities.  According to the article at E Online, Miller is keeping details about the film under wraps.  One could easily read into that that he doesn’t even have these details stamped down.

Not knowing what the female lead role is, I can’t comment on whether Theron would make a good choice or not.  Hardy, on the other hand, is making a name for himself as a badass all over the festival circuit with BRONSON, and, while I’m sure he would physically be perfect for the part, I’m still not sold on the idea of this movie as a whole anyway.  I was intrigued a year or two ago when it was going to be an animated feature.  That may have sparked some interest, most notably because it could mean Mel Gibson might have been back to voice the role.

At this stage of the game, Miller needs to reassess the notion that Gibson is too old for the part, and, instead of casting younger actors to further the adventures of Mad Max, make Max older and show us that world.  I want to see what an aged Mad Max has to contend with in his day-to-day life.  At this point, if you’re casting anyone other than Gibson in the lead role, you might as well be calling it something completely different.

THE ROAD To Nowhere Leads to This Final Poster

the road final poster

At this point, the marketing campaign for the John Hillcoat-directed adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s THE ROAD could be an extreme closeup of dry pavement, and we’d all be standing in line opening day to see it.  This final poster for the film, however, brought to us by Coming Soon, does a fine job, nonetheless, of conveying the film’s message.  A father in a barren wasteland of a world desperately struggling to keep his young son safe from the dangers of this strange world.  That about sums it up, and it’s all there in brilliant color.

THE ROAD hits theaters on November 25th.

Review: ‘The Burning Plain’

the burning plain

Guillermo Arriaga has a hard time with chronological structure.   With screenplays like ’21 Grams,’ ‘The Three Burial of Melquiades Estrada,’ and ‘Babel’ under his belt, he appears more as a quilt-maker than a writer of film.   All of his films are made up of several, different strands connected by either some, underlying theme or overlaying event, and, in some cases, the nature of the beast is the most interesting element of the screenplay.   With ‘The Burning Plain,’ Arriaga steps behind the camera on one of his own screenplays, and, despite the film’s superb cast and lush camera-work, its heavy-handed focus and predictability end up amounting to little more than trivial drama.

Laid out in a two-prong fashion, the film follows two women, played by Charlize Theron and Kim Basinger.   Set up in nondescript times or places (specifically nondescript, the basic nature of the “where” and “when” can be sorted out early on), we jump back and forth to these two women and the lives they have set before themselves.   Theron’s Sylvia is, for all intents and purposes, a zombie, living in a gray world that seems to lack both emotional and physical feeling.   She runs a restaurant, but her personal life is ashambles, as she jumps from one man to the next, never allowing herself even the slightest bit of passion.

Basinger plays Gina, a housewife living in a small town somewhere near Mexico.   She is carrying on an affair with a Mexican local, played by Joaquim de Almeida, trying to balance her life between her family and the man she truly feels sentiment for.   It isn’t long before Gina’s teenage daughter, Mariana, catches on to her mother’s infidelities.

It isn’t hard to discover where the connect between these two stories lies.   It doesn’t even seem as if Arriaga is attempting any sense of mystery between them.   His precision of handling in allowing the bridge to reveal itself is as if done with a butcher’s knife.   Other stories that trail off from these, Mariana and a local boy years down the road and a story involving a young girl and her crop-dusting father, are a little more mysterious in their presence, but they don’t stay in hiding long.  It doesn’t matter if Arriaga intended for this lack of mystery or not.  Once you know where the story is headed, it’s just a matter of sitting back and watching it all unfold without much to spicen it up.  The last half of the film plays like watching someone else put together a jigsaw puzzle, one whose box you have in your hands so you know exactly what the finished product is going to look like.  Maybe this could have worked as a structure, but the picture we are working towards in terms of story, the quilt which Arriaga is crafting, is gray, heavy, and borders very near dullness.

Cinematographer Robert Elswit helps make the film a beautiful one to observe, thankfully.  Honing his skills on movies like ‘Good Night and Good Luck’ and ‘There Will Be Blood’ has given him the sense of color depth, and whether we are in the murky world of Sylvia, the vibrant desert of Gina, or even the seemingly chaotic patterns that form in the sorghum fields of one, particular scene, we are always amidst something beautiful.  Though the content is calloused and difficult to connect with, the worlds Elswit and Arriaga create in their shots immerse us, allowing us some kind of connect to the story, even if it is one built on style.

Everyone in the cast does their straight-path performance, no one ever really standing up and taking charge of a stand-out spotlight.  Basinger probably comes closest to grabbing the audience’s attention.  You begin feeling for her, understanding her struggles between loyalty to family and the bottled up passion she can only show to this one man.  Theron’s character probably offers the highest level of transformation, from her hard shell in the early moments to the softening of her emotions in the latter moments when someone unexpected comes back into her life.  Theron, for all of her talents, doesn’t do the best job she can in pulling this off, however.  This gives her character a sense of one-notedness, and, in the end, we question how far along she truly has come.

Keeping similar structures as his previous screenplays, Arriaga’s newest film is a more compact story, a film about the lives of only a few people instead of the world of different lives he set forth in ‘Babel.’  Unfortunately, the strokes with which he paints the story are so heavy and caked on, it becomes difficult to find our bearing within each strand.  The shots are beautiful and much of the acting is commendable, but, without a gripping story for them to surround themselves, the film ends up becoming a forgettable experiment in style over substance.  It’s heavy drama for all the wrong reasons.  Perhaps Arriaga should have jettisoned his sporadic structure for a more linear format for something so small.  This probably would have helped with the connections.

Berg Confirmes Smith and Theron for ‘Hancock 2’

hancock

It wasn’t long ago that word came down that ‘Hancock 2’ was in the works.  Within a span of a week, the project had director Peter Berg making declarations about the storyline and had two screenwriters jumping on board for Columbia.  Now, it appears the two leads for the first ‘Hancock’ will be returning.

MTV caught up with Berg about Will Smith and Charlize Theron’s involvement in the sequel.

Everybody’s going to come back for a sequel.

That’s what Berg had to say on the matter.  This confirms something Theron stated to MTV last September when she said she would follow Smith wherever her went.

In the article from MTV, Berg also makes mention of [SPOILERS AHEAD] his potential third superhero who would pop up in the sequel.  He stated he had a well-known player in mind to fill the role.

We have [someone in mind].  I’m not gonna tell you who, but we have!

With everything moving awfully fast on ‘Hancock 2,’ we might expect an official announcement from Columbia in the coming weeks as to a start date and a potential release date.

‘Hancock 2’ Gets a Pair of Screenwriters

hancock

Mere days after director Peter Berg dished out some juicy details about the direction the next ‘Hancock’ film might take, the film has taken on two screenwriters. According to The Hollywood Reporter, it seems production on ‘Hancock 2’ is fast-approaching, as Adam Fierro and Glen Mazzara have signed on with Columbia Pictures to pen the script.

While plot details haven’t been revealed, Berg did divulge in a recent interview that the film could have the premise of another being in the world with the same powers as Hancock, played by Will Smith.   The end of the first film revealed there was one other with similar powers, but Berg commented that there could be a possible third out there somewhere.

‘Hancock’ took in a worldwide gross of $624 million.   While it took nearly 12 years to get that film from script to film, expect the sequel to be on a much faster track.   Fierro is coming off “The Shield,” while Mazzara worked on NBC’s “Life.”   While Smith has not officially signed on for a sequel, expect Columbia to dish out all kinds of money to get the star back on.

Director Berg Talks Up ‘Hancock’ Sequel

hancock

Peter Berg’s got a lot on his plate.  With season four of “Friday Night Lights” (still the best written show on television) coming up, his new show, “Trauma,” taking off this Fall, and his new adaptation of ‘Dune,’ in the works, you wouldn’t think he’d be spending much time coming up with ideas for ‘Hancock 2.’  Well, that’s what you get for not listening to the $624 million his 2008, Will Smith blockbuster made worldwide.

While chatting with Sci-Fi Wire, Berg divulged some of the ideas he’s concocting for a possible sequel.

Here is what he had to say, and, be warned, there are spoilers about the first film in there:

There might be another god out there.  Might be another one.

At the end of ‘Hancock,’ it was revealed that Will Smith and Charlize Theron were both Gods, living immortal lives until they come within close contact of one another.  At that point, all hell breaks loose, and their immortality begins to wane.  If a third God comes into the mix, you just know there’s going to be all kinds of hellacious CG goodness to wreek havoc with.

As far as that growing slate goes, Berg also mentioned that this one might get pushed up sooner rather than later.

They like to fast-track it, but Will’s busy, I’m pretty busy.  We’re excited to do one, but we want the script to be right and the movie to be right. We don’t feel a burning imperative to go right back into it.

I’m sure a nice bag full of proceeds from the first film will change Berg’s mind in a heartbeat.