RIO, I LOVE YOU Review

RIO I LOVE YOU a

RIO, I LOVE YOU is the third in the “Cities of Love” series begun with “Paris, Je T’Aime” (“Paris, I Love You”), which bring together famous directors and stars to create a series of little romantic stories around one city. The city getting the love-letter this time is Rio, home of the upcoming Olympics. However, despite its impressive list of directors, there is little to impress in “Rio, I Love You.”

RIO, I LOVE YOU boasts a more impressive line up of directors that the last one, “New York, I Love You,” but nonetheless continues the series decline in quality from the first one. Directors include Paolo Sorrentino (“Youth”), Fernando Meirelles (“City of God”), and Sang-Soo Im (“The Housemaid”), among others, but none of them shine in this mixed-up film. Rather than having the stories start and end clearly, as in the first two films, several stories make false starts or overlap with characters from others, and are blended in with mostly aerial picture-postcard shots of Rio’s distinct landscape or beaches. Besides making it look like a tourist ad, it makes it difficult to tell when stories start or end.

The international cast includes Emily Mortimer, Vincent Cassel, Harvey Keitel, Jason Isaacs, John Turturro (who wrote, directs and stars in his segment) and Fernanda Montenegro, but the stories, some of which make little sense, hardly make good use of them. Most disappointing is Paolo Sorrentino’s segment “La Fortuna,” which stars Emily Mortimer as a much younger trophy wife who needles her older, wheelchair-bound architect husband (Basil Hoffman) until the segment comes to a chillingly cold end. The great actress Fernanda Montenegro stars in an odd bit as a grandmother who chooses to live as a homeless person, trying to convince her grandson that bathing in a fountain is much more fun.

Director Sang-Soo Im’s fantasy segment features a waiter/vampire who leads a parade of dancing prostitute/vampires down a street. Another nonsensical segment has an Australian movie star ditching his appearance at a film festival to impulsively free-climb Sugarloaf mountain. Turturro’s segment stars him and singer Vanessa Paradis as a longtime couple breaking up, which ends with her singing like a music video. A segment about a hang-glider soaring Rio’s iconic Christ statue while criticizing the city seems pointless.

There are a few segments that work a little better, although they are not enough to save the film. One is a brief, wordless segment starring Vincent Cassel and featuring interesting camera angles, as a beach sand sculptor instantly falls in love and immediately has his heart broken, but is inspired to make his art better. The sweetest story, directed and co-starring Nadine Labaki, features a little boy who has staked out a pay phone in a train station, because he is waiting for a call from Jesus, and Harvey Keitel as an actor playing a priest, who helps that dream come true.

Guillermo Arriaga’s “Texas” is the strongest drama, centering on a former boxer with that nickname and his former model wife, both injured in a car accident that put her in a wheelchair and cost him his arm. The couple get an offer from an American, played by Jason Isaacs, that could help them or further ruin their lives. In another segment “Pas de Deux,” a pair of ballet dancers and lovers, argue about their future as they dance.

RIO, I LOVE YOU is the weakest of the series, but it is unlikely to be the last.

RIO, I LOVE YOU opens on April 15th, 2016

OVERALL RATING: 2 OUT OF 5 STARS

rio one sht

Trailer For Guillermo Arriaga’s WORDS WITH GODS Debuts

words with gods

The trailer for Guillermo Arriaga’s lead anthology film, WORDS WITH GOD, has debuted.

WORDS WITH GOD is based on a concept by Guillermo Arriaga ( AMORES PERROS, 21 GRAMS, THE BURNING PLAIN) with original music by Peter Gabriel (“Why Don’t You Show Yourself?”) and shaped into its current form by Nobel Prize award winner Mario Vargas Llosa.

The faith themed anthology is directed by filmmakers Guillermo Arriaga, Hector Babenco, Bahman Ghobadi, Amos Gitai, Emir Kusturica, Mira Nair, Hideo Nakata, Warwick Thornton and Alex de la Iglesia. Along with Guillermo Arriaga, Alex Garcia and Lucas Akoskin (who both founded BN Films) are producing the film.

In WORDS WITH GOD, each director recounts a narrative centered around human fragility, as well as environmental and cultural crises involving specific religions with which each has a personal relationship; including early Aboriginal Spirituality, Umbanda, Buddhism, the Abrahamic faiths, Hinduism, and Atheism. An animated sequence by Mexican animator Maribel Martinez is woven through each of the film segments, with each segment narratively connected as a feature length film. WORDS WITH GOD is ultimately the first part of the Arriaga-helmed Heartbeat of the World feature film series, which will include Encounters, a look at sexual identity (currently in pre-production), Into the Bloodstream, an exploration into drugs; and Polis, an examination of politics (with the latter two in development).

WORDS WITH GOD will be released both in its feature length capacity, and as stand-alone films from each director. The film will be launched later this year at film festivals, followed by a worldwide cinema release.

The movie is currently in post-production.

Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/WordsWithGods
Twitter – https://twitter.com/WordsWithGods
Tumblr – http://wordswithgods.tumblr.com/

Review: ‘The Burning Plain’

the burning plain

Guillermo Arriaga has a hard time with chronological structure.   With screenplays like ’21 Grams,’ ‘The Three Burial of Melquiades Estrada,’ and ‘Babel’ under his belt, he appears more as a quilt-maker than a writer of film.   All of his films are made up of several, different strands connected by either some, underlying theme or overlaying event, and, in some cases, the nature of the beast is the most interesting element of the screenplay.   With ‘The Burning Plain,’ Arriaga steps behind the camera on one of his own screenplays, and, despite the film’s superb cast and lush camera-work, its heavy-handed focus and predictability end up amounting to little more than trivial drama.

Laid out in a two-prong fashion, the film follows two women, played by Charlize Theron and Kim Basinger.   Set up in nondescript times or places (specifically nondescript, the basic nature of the “where” and “when” can be sorted out early on), we jump back and forth to these two women and the lives they have set before themselves.   Theron’s Sylvia is, for all intents and purposes, a zombie, living in a gray world that seems to lack both emotional and physical feeling.   She runs a restaurant, but her personal life is ashambles, as she jumps from one man to the next, never allowing herself even the slightest bit of passion.

Basinger plays Gina, a housewife living in a small town somewhere near Mexico.   She is carrying on an affair with a Mexican local, played by Joaquim de Almeida, trying to balance her life between her family and the man she truly feels sentiment for.   It isn’t long before Gina’s teenage daughter, Mariana, catches on to her mother’s infidelities.

It isn’t hard to discover where the connect between these two stories lies.   It doesn’t even seem as if Arriaga is attempting any sense of mystery between them.   His precision of handling in allowing the bridge to reveal itself is as if done with a butcher’s knife.   Other stories that trail off from these, Mariana and a local boy years down the road and a story involving a young girl and her crop-dusting father, are a little more mysterious in their presence, but they don’t stay in hiding long.  It doesn’t matter if Arriaga intended for this lack of mystery or not.  Once you know where the story is headed, it’s just a matter of sitting back and watching it all unfold without much to spicen it up.  The last half of the film plays like watching someone else put together a jigsaw puzzle, one whose box you have in your hands so you know exactly what the finished product is going to look like.  Maybe this could have worked as a structure, but the picture we are working towards in terms of story, the quilt which Arriaga is crafting, is gray, heavy, and borders very near dullness.

Cinematographer Robert Elswit helps make the film a beautiful one to observe, thankfully.  Honing his skills on movies like ‘Good Night and Good Luck’ and ‘There Will Be Blood’ has given him the sense of color depth, and whether we are in the murky world of Sylvia, the vibrant desert of Gina, or even the seemingly chaotic patterns that form in the sorghum fields of one, particular scene, we are always amidst something beautiful.  Though the content is calloused and difficult to connect with, the worlds Elswit and Arriaga create in their shots immerse us, allowing us some kind of connect to the story, even if it is one built on style.

Everyone in the cast does their straight-path performance, no one ever really standing up and taking charge of a stand-out spotlight.  Basinger probably comes closest to grabbing the audience’s attention.  You begin feeling for her, understanding her struggles between loyalty to family and the bottled up passion she can only show to this one man.  Theron’s character probably offers the highest level of transformation, from her hard shell in the early moments to the softening of her emotions in the latter moments when someone unexpected comes back into her life.  Theron, for all of her talents, doesn’t do the best job she can in pulling this off, however.  This gives her character a sense of one-notedness, and, in the end, we question how far along she truly has come.

Keeping similar structures as his previous screenplays, Arriaga’s newest film is a more compact story, a film about the lives of only a few people instead of the world of different lives he set forth in ‘Babel.’  Unfortunately, the strokes with which he paints the story are so heavy and caked on, it becomes difficult to find our bearing within each strand.  The shots are beautiful and much of the acting is commendable, but, without a gripping story for them to surround themselves, the film ends up becoming a forgettable experiment in style over substance.  It’s heavy drama for all the wrong reasons.  Perhaps Arriaga should have jettisoned his sporadic structure for a more linear format for something so small.  This probably would have helped with the connections.