PADDINGTON – The Review

paddington_image

Just what we need, another cute kids’ movie about a lovable, talking animal. Children can’t seem to get enough of these movies, despite how dreadfully awful they usually are, by most adults’ standards. Spy on parents some time while they treat their little ones to these chatty creature films and you’re likely to find most of them struggling to grin and bear the experience. Yeah. See what I did there?

Normally, you’d be hard pressed to find me caught anywhere near one of these movies. There are, of course, always those rare exceptions that lead you to eat that bitter N word… “never.” This is why I try and never say never about a film, unless its in the title. PADDINGTON (2014) is a family-friendly film, and by that I mean its friendly for the entire family, children and adults. The film is based upon the beloved books by author Michael Bond, who wrote his first Paddington piece n 1958, inspired by the childrens programs he worked on for the BBC at the time.

I will be honest. When I first heard about the new PADDINGTON movie, what went through my head was the cliched assumption that they’ve yet again — or, still — run out of original ideas. This ended up being an unfair assumption about a movie that works surprisingly well. The reason for the film working out this well is simple. PADDINGTON is written and directed by the same person — always a promising sign — and that person is Paul King. For the coolest of our readers, you’ll likely know this name as the director of the quirky British series The Mighty Boosh (2004-2007). For a show recognized as possibly being created while on acid, and could be described as the love child of Wes Anderson and Pee Wee Herman, parents may be alarmed to learn it eventually led a feature-length PADDINGTON film. Fear not. The only addictive substance being consumed here is freshly made marmalade.

Those familiar with The Might Boosh will notice the little influences of this style from the very beginning, as PADDINGTON opens with an old newsreel about an explorer named Montgomery Clyde, who ventured out into “Darkest Peru,” where he stumbled upon a rare species of highly intelligent bears. Befriended a young bear cub (Paddington), his Aunt Lucy (voiced by Imelda Staunton) and Uncle Pastuzo (voiced by Michael Gambon), Montgomery Clyde left more of an impression on the bears that he could have ever imagined. Fast forward several years, and natural disaster in Darkest Peru has Aunt Lucy sending Paddington (voiced by Ben Whishaw) off to London to find a nice family to take him in and raise him as their own. London is about to host its first ever talking bear, and with him all of his accompanying adventures.

The Brown family are an average lot, but display a familiar hint of dysfunction. Mr. Brown (Hugh Bonneville) is a work-aholic risk analyst with a tendency towards OCD, while Mrs. Brown (Sally Hawkins) is a loving, free-spirited illustrator of childrens stories. Judy Brown (Madeleine Harris) is a typical angst-ridden teenage girl and Jonathan Brown (Samuel Joslin) is a curious, adventurous adolescent boy. One day, the Browns happen upon a young talking bear whilst walking through Paddington Station, hence the origin of the title character’s human name. His bear name becomes one of a handful of low-key running jokes that are sprinkled delightfully throughout the film. Under pressure from Mrs. Brown and Jonathan, Mr. Brown caves and Paddington finds himself the newest addition to the Brown family.

As Paddington assimilates into his new family, he must also avoid the fiendishly obsessed desires of Millicent, the villainous taxidermist set upon capturing Paddington and adding him to her personal collection of permanently preserved wildlife specimens. Millicent, played by Nicole Kidman, is portrayed as a more modern Cruella Deville. Kidman relies heavily on textbook villain tactics, providing an acceptable but minimally impressive performance. Even her name Millicent is strangely similar to Maleficent, and despite being a family film, she offers little in the way of believable danger. As for the remainder of the supporting cast, here lies one treat after another. Mrs. Bird (played by Julie Walters) is a tough, but oddly grounding force within the Brown household. Mr. Gruber (played by Jim Broadbent) is a funny old survivor who helps Paddington find what he’s seeking. Mr. Curry (played by Dr. Who‘s Peter Capaldi) serves as a sort of sub-villain turned anti-hero and strange neighbor to the Browns.

PADDINGTON exploits modern computer technology to bring the talking, accident-prone bear to life. Even ten years ago, it’s unlikely this film could have succeeded on any respectably mature level. Its this technical mastery that adds half of the character’s charm, from his appearance to his mannerisms to numerous sight gags, but the other half is courtesy of Paul King’s playfully odd sense of humor. Subtle puns, plays on words, silly observations and misunderstandings, these are all tools in King’s box of tricks that are used to give the film its well-rounded appeal. On many levels, I could stretch my analysis and call PADDINGTON an analogy for immigration and society’s difficulty in accepting change and the arrival of outside influences. There is definitely a correlation there, but I’ll let you read into that as much or as little as you feel comfortably inclined.

Visually, PADDINGTON is thoroughly engaging, filled with action, visual gags and no shortage of hijinks put innocently into play by the well-meaning Peruvian bear cub, struggling to adapt and find his place in a foreign land. The 95-minute running time falls nicely between being too long and feeling rushed. With all this said, there is still clearly the element of filmmaking for kids, which is only to be expected. Fortunately, these elements are well incorporated and never overwhelmingly present. Combine this with a vivid color palette and you have a film that should do remarkably well with boys and girls alike.

Overall Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

paddington_poster

Disney Officially Dumps Miramax

It’s hard to believe it’s actually happened, but it’s sort of been a long time coming. After surviving a slacking market and budget cuts for this long, Disney has officially shut down Miramax Films. Known for it’s focus on arthouse films, Miramax was founded in 1979 by the Weinstein Brothers, Bob and Harvey, giving several filmmakers the financial nudge needed to make their marks.

The now defunct studio will always be remembered for helping bring films like CLERKS, RESERVOIR DOGS and BOONDOCK SAINTS to audiences, but not without it’s share of controversy. However, the studio also remains a legendary Oscar powerhouse, evoking memories of the old studio system in it’s run of consecutive Academy Award outings that included THE PIANO, THE CRYING GAME, THE ENGLISH PATIENT, SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE and CHICAGO.

The studio was purchased by Disney back in 1993, but the Weinstein Brothers continued to run the studio with the same hard-nosed, controlling attitude that made them successful. After duking it out with Michael Eisner, the Weinstein Brothers left Miramax behind at Disney and formed The Weinstein Company in 2005. While the brand may be no more, the films the studio gave birth to remain a significant contribution. Hopefully, The Weinstein Company will be able to pick up where Miramax left off…

Source: Empire

‘Youth’ Revolts Back to January

youth in revolt

Michael Cera just isn’t Academy Award-caliber.   How else can you explain The Weinstein Company’s decision to push the new comedy, ‘Youth in Revolt,’ back to January from its previous release date of October 30th.   The new date is January 15th, to be precise, and the film, currently playing at the Toronto International Film Fest, is getting better than average scores, even if it is slightly hit-or-miss among critics.

This is a strange move considering there are no wide releases slated for October 30th.   ‘The Boondock Saints II: All Saint’s Day,’ ‘Endgame,’ ‘Gentleman Broncos,’ ‘The House of the Devil,’ and ‘Turning Green’ are all set for limited release on that day.   ‘Youth in Revolt’ was planned for a limited release, as well, though its release was sure to be wider than your standard “New York and LA” limited fare.

This move pits ‘Youth in Revolt’ in the dead zone of the world of the motion picture release schedule.   Opening opposite it on January 15th are ‘The Book of Eli’ and ‘Hoodwinked Too!,’ two films wholly different in nature than the teen-based comedy.   The push won’t necessarily garner the film any more attention, and it’s not like The Weinsteins are trying to get away from any Halloween, horror season.   With films like ‘Daybreakers’ and ‘Legion’ opening up in January, the early part of 2010 seems more horror-related than this coming October.

Regardless of reasoning, ‘Youth in Revolt’ remains firmly on my “anticipated” list.   The trailer looks hilarious and it’s going to be interesting seeing Cera play more of a bad-ass part, even if it’s all in his head.

Yet another ‘Scream’ movie …

Yes, that’s right boys and girls … there will be a ‘Scream 4’ and I for one am EXCITED (not really).

“Yesterday, The Weinstein Company sent out a press release about how it’s signed a 7-year pay-television deal with Showtime, to begin with the company’s 2009 slate (that includes flicks like Inglorious Bastards and Dimension flicks like Youth in Revolt). (Read it in its entirety after the jump.) Nestled towards the end, the press release says the deal includes “the remake of David Cronenberg’s Scanners, re-starting the Scream franchise with Scream 4, and Piranha 3D.””

Thanks to Cinematical..

What do you guys think about a new ‘Scream’ movie? Do you think Neve Campbell will be back? What about Jenny McCarthy? Yikes man… this is a sad news story.

‘Fanboys’ is back on track!

Yep, thats right, Mr.Weinstein got off his fat ass and now we have our movie back in play! I’ve been waiting a long time for this movie and it looks absolutely terrific!

Got this from our good buddies at AintItCoolNews.com

Fellow Star Wars Fans,

The battle to save Fanboys is over! AND WE WON!

The Weinstein Company has decided to listen to the outcry from Star Wars fans around the globe! They have restored the original plotline and have given the movie back to the Star Wars fans who made it!

The film has been given back to the original director and he is currently editing the final version at Skywalker Ranch! The original cut of the movie will be released in theaters later this year! And there are rumors of a sneak preview of the film happening at the San Diego Comic-Con!

We hereby end our boycott of the Weinstein Company! The studio has earned our respect and gratitude by actually listening to their target audience.

Our thanks go out to everyone who lent their voices to the Stop Darth Weinstein campaign, and to the thousands of fans who took the time to email the studio.
When the original version of Fanboys is released later this year you should all take pride in knowing that you helped make it happen!

When the official release date for Fanboys is announced we will post it here!

May the Force Be With You Always!

Sincerely,

Jek Porkins
Zev Senesca
Biggs Darklighter
Dack Ralter
& the SDW Squadron

I do know Scott and I are overly excited to see this film and hope they don’t screw what they originally had planned for the film.

When do you think would be an appropriate time for this movie to be released? Maybe a week after Clone Wars hits?