MIRACLES FROM HEAVEN – The Review

 

for use in 11.23 Scoop first Angela (QUEEN LATIFAH) braids Anna's (KYLIE ROGERS) hair as Christy (JENNIFER GARNER) watches in Columbia Pictures' MIRACLES FROM HEAVEN. Jennifer Garner;Queen Latifah;Kylie Rogers ©2015 CTMG. All Rights Reserved. Jennifer Garner (Finalized);Quee Miracles From Heaven

MIRACLES FROM HEAVEN explores issues of family and faith while telling the true tale of Texan Christy Beam (played by Jennifer Garner) that begins when her 10-year old daughter Anna (Kylie Rogers) develops horrible stomach pain. The child is initially misdiagnosed, and when her disorder is discovered to be an incurable, and ultimately fatal, digestive disease, Christy finds herself a fierce advocate for Anna’s health. She travels to Boston frequently to work with Dr. Nirko (Eugenio Derbez), apparently the only specialist in the country who can help. Back home, Christy’s husband Kevin (Martin Henderson) does his best to hold down the fort with their other two daughters while dealing with impending financial stress. After a freak accident involving a hollow tree and a glimpse of God and Heaven, a miracle unfolds that leaves doctors confounded and the Beam’s small-town community inspired.

MIRACLES FROM HEAVEN is as decent and square as it sounds. No profanity. No sex. No violence. That’s its hook. Unpretentious and plainspoken, it knows its target Christian audience well. Adapted from the memoir by Christy Beam, MIRACLES FROM HEAVEN is no religious fringe event. It’s from a major studio (Sony), with an Oscar-nominated costar (Queen Latifa), and adapted for the screen by TROUBLE WITH THE CURVE screenwriter Randy Brown. MIRACLES FROM HEAVEN has lots of sweet, sunny, Norman Rockwell-inspired imagery of small-town life and wholesome family high jinx. What it lacks, at least on its surface, is dramatic tension. There’s no real villain, no conflict and no resolution outside of the big miracle – just 90 minutes of sad scenes in which Anna suffers while her family reacts with tears of sorrow followed by 20 minutes of tears of happiness. There are no real plot twists and not much more to the unchallenging story other than how Anna’s revelations affect the other residents of their small Texas town. MIRACLES FROM HEAVEN has something of a Made-for-TV feel about it, unsurprising considering the subject matter and PG rating and feels padded at 114 minutes – I’m not sure we needed to take two side trips to the Boston Aquarium.

That said, I found more than enough positives in MIRACLES FROM HEAVEN to recommend it. The movie works, but not in mysterious ways. Its heart is certainly in the right place and it illustrate Christy’s conflict with great emotion and drama. It’s a heartbreaking (and heartwarming) story that shifts into the right gears when the script demands it. Director Patricia Riggens (THE 33) makes some wise choices, such as the subtle way she reenacts young Anna’s visit to heaven after her accident with the tree, cleverly echoing her reaction to Monet’s paintings of flowers on an earlier trip to the Boston Museum of Fine Arts.

The hardest thing for any parent is watching your child suffer and knowing there is nothing you can do to help, and MIRACLES FROM HEAVEN is at its best when capturing that gut-wrenching dilemma. Jennifer Garner does an excellent job illustrating Christy Beam’s frustrations with clueless doctors and judgmental neighbors and the turmoil she and her husband endure. There’s a convincing desperation in Garner’s hardworking performance that elevates the vanilla narrative from a choir-preaching faith-based film to something more relatable. Queen Latifa shows up in full sass mode as a waitress who takes Christy and Anna on a tour of Boston. The character is superfluous to the story, but Ms Latifa’s job is to provide levity to the downbeat proceedings and she’s pitch perfect.

Like 2014’s similar HEAVEN IS FOR REAL, MIRACLES FROM HEAVEN is not a movie for cynics. They’ll find it naïve and superficial and may be suspicious of the Beam family’s motives and personal gain (something tells me their financial situation is looking pretty rosy these days). But all the critic eye-rolling and snark likely to greet the film from some quarters won’t matter to its target Christian audience. They will sleep better at night believing God saved this child and leave the theater grinning from ear to ear. Not just because it will reaffirm their faith but also because it has an emotional story, an adorable little girl at its center (who almost dies!), and some good ol’ country church singin’. It serves as a reminder of the great love of family – something not always well-captured on film – and has a comforting message about what is important in our lives. It may or may not convert skeptics, but if they wander into the multiplex they may find MIRACLES FROM HEAVEN a nicely photographed and well-acted sermon that goes down easy. Miraculous indeed.

4 of 5 Stars

Miracles_From_Heaven_14490963435677

Review: THE DILEMMA

During Hollywood’s “golden age” directors had to be able to jump from genre to genre. Someone like Howard Hawks could go from screwball comedy to western to mystery. These days most directors like to work in one genre. Ron Howard is the rare exception. He started out with comedies like NIGHT SHIFT and SPLASH then tried fantasy ( WILLOW ), thrillers ( RANSOM and Dan Brown’s Robert Langdon stories), and had great success with historical docudramas ( APOLLO 13, FROST/NIXON). Now Howard has returned to comedy after more than a decade with THE DILEMMA. This time the film’s  laughs have a serious theme at it’s center.

At the heart of THE DILEMMA is the friendship of two old college buddies Ronny ( Vince Vaughn ) and Nick ( Kevin James ) who are business partners at an auto design firm in Chicago. Ronny’s the fast talking salesman while Nick is the tech wizard. After landing an interview with one of the big auto makers, the guys go out celebrating with their gals. Nick has been married for several years to Geneva ( Winona Ryder ), while confirmed bachelor Ronny has been dating Beth ( Jennifer Connelly ), a chef at a popular restaurant. After the meeting with the auto big wigs in Detroit goes well ( they’re going to make electric cars sound like classic hot rod engines?! ), Ronny decides that it’s time to propose to Beth. While scoping out the Botanical Gardens as a possible engagement site, Ronny spots Nick’s wife Geneva making out with a young tattooed stud ( Channing Tatum ). This is the dilemma that the film’s tile refers. Should he just tell his pal and plunge him into misery ( and possibly derail their business venture )? Maybe Ronny should confront Geneva and convince her to end the affair. Or perhaps Ronny should just keep quiet and say nothing. What should he do? Many film goers may ask, “What would I do?”.

Howard does his best trying to balance the dramatic elements with the broad comic scenes, but he’s thwarted by a script that has the characters acting improbably-to use a phrase coined by Siskel and Ebert, ” the idiot plot”. Why does Ronny refuse to share his plight with Beth? Does he think he can spy on Geneva while driving around in his classic 1960’s muscle car? After a disturbingly bloody and violent confrontation with Zip (?!), Geneva’s boy-toy, why does Ronny stick around to taunt him? And why does Ronny return to Zip’s pad to retrieve his camera? The actors are giving it heir best effort to make this material work. Vaughn is doing his motor-mouth wiseacre , but usually his characters are a lot smarter, as in DODGEBALL and WEDDING CRASHERS. You just wants to grab him by the shoulders, shake him, and yell, “C’mon!! You’re smarter than this!!”. James doesn’t get to utilize his great comic timing and superb skills in physical comedy ( beside an awkward dance scene with Vaughn ). In many scenes he’s Vaughn’s schlubby straight man. The lovely Connelly is underused in basically the exasperated, but understanding girlfriend role. Ryder has the more complex part. She almost gets some sympathy going as she explains her marital frustrations, but suddenly turns into a vindictive blackmailing harpy. She’d not helped by the decision to give her some severe, unflattering make-up, perhaps to emphasize her as the bad girl in comparison to Connelly’s good girl. Channing fulfills his duty as eye candy, but is not allowed to bring any humanity or humor to his role. Queen Latifah tries to brings some energy to the poorly written character of the lady auto exec who’s cheering the boys on. I was embarrassed by some of the dialogue she’s saddled with ( “lady-wood”?! Twice?!).Chicago looks great and there are some big laughs in the film, but they’re derailed by too many scenes that drag on far too long and don’t make much sense. The tacked-on upbeat ending doesn’t help things.  Ron Howard’s one of our most talented  and versatile directors. I hope that the next time he ventures into the comedy genre he can find a more worthy project.

Overall Rating: Three Stars out of Five

Review: ‘Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs’

iceage3movie

The Ice Age saga continues with its new installment Dawn of the Dinosaurs in 3-D! The gang is all back for some new shenanigans, along with some new faces.

Manny (Ray Romano) and Ellie (Queen Latifah) are still together, and expecting their first child. Ellie is excited beyond belief about their first bundle of joy, while Manny is extremely uneasy and frightened. Sid (John Leguizamo) is green with envy and has a longing to have children of his own. Lucky for him, he stumbles upon three eggs that turn out to be dinosaurs. Diego (Dennis Leary) isn’t without his inner struggle either… he is worried that he isn’t the ferocious animal that he once was. He feels like he has gone soft and lost his strength. Of course it is Sid that causes the main drama in the whole film when mama dinosaur comes to look for her missing spawn.

The story wasn’t as good as the other Ice Age stories. While it kept my interest, it just seemed a bit boring. Do we really need a struggle about whether or not the main characters should be excited to have a baby? If I was a bit bored with it, then I can only imagine how boring it would be for a child. The bread and butter of this whole movie is the 3-D. While not as detailed and sharp as a Pixar movie, it is still fun to experience. I think I was tricked into liking this movie with the 3-D effects because the story really wasn’t that exciting. How are they going to market this for DVD without the stellar visual effects? I did hear someone in the audience mention that the dinosaurs were too fake looking in the film and I had to laugh. Hello! It’s animation! If you want realistic then watch Jurassic Park!

The voices in this film really are fun. Ray Romano is the only on that I have never been a huge fan of. I can overlook it because I like the character and the movie, but his voice is boring.Queen Latifah, on the other hand, is great! Her voice is entertaining and easy to fall in love with. Heck, I bet it would be fun to have a slumber party and bake cupcakes with her! Sigh!

Trailer for ‘Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs’

iceage3dod

DreamWorks has been the next best thing in computer-animated comedies for awhile now, second only (of course) to Pixar. So, this is probably one of a very few, rare times when you’ll hear me say I’m looking forward to a THIRD movie in an animated franchise. ‘Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs’ may not sticking very closely (at all) to the bio-geological facts of life on Earth, but it certainly is likely to please fans for a third go round. The voice cast features the usual suspects, including John Leguizamo, Ray Romano, Queen Latifa, Dennis Leary and Seann William Scott.

Watch the trailer below and ready yourself for a July 1, 2009 release date. Oh, yeah… and did I mention it’s going to be 3D?