28 YEARS LATER – Review

Dr. Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) in Columbia Pictures’ 28 YEARS LATER. Courtesy of Columbia Pictures

28 DAYS LATER was a terrifying horror hit about an viral infection that ripped through Britain, rapidly killing its victims and turning them into angry zombies that spread the infection. Director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland followed that up with 28 WEEKS LATER, with the Rage virus morphing and spreading to Europe. Now Boyle and Garland are back for a third round, but this time set farther into the future, with 28 YEARS LATER.

Set much farther in the future from 28 WEEKS LATER, 28 YEARS LATER is not a true sequel that continues the story line of 28 WEEKS LATER, but a new full-on post-apocalyptic story set in the same world. After a prologue that loosely ties this new film to the previous one, in which a boy evades to zombies who kill his parents, the film updates us on the situation 28 years later. The Rage virus has been fought back on the European continent but Britain has been declared a quarantine zone, with the remaining people abandoned to their fate and the waters around Britain patrolled by NATO to contain the virus.

Cillian Murphy was the star of the first two horror films, doesn’t appear in this one (although he is one of the film’s producers). Instead, the main character is a 12-year-old boy named Spike (Alfie Williams), who lives in a colony of survivors on an island off the northeast coast of England.

The people on the island are pretty self-sufficient, growing food and raising domesticated animals, with a structured society with assigned jobs and a store of scavenged items for things they can’t or don’t produce themselves in a pseudo pre-industrial life. Being an island helps keep them safe but they also guard against intruding zombie with a force armed with bows and arrows. The island does have an access to the mainland, a causeway that is accessible only at low tide. which they guard with a gate and sentries. The villagers seem to have created a pretty comfortable life but the one thing they lack is a doctor.

Spike lives with his parents Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) and Isla (Jodie Comer), and his grandfather. Isla is sick with a mysterious illness that comes and goes, leaving her with terrible headaches and confused when she is in the grip of a bout, but a lively, fun-loving person when she’s feeling well. With mom not feeling well, Spike’s dad Jamie decides his son is ready for the colony’s coming-of-age ritual, at trip to the mainland with his father, to kill his first zombie. Although as the other villagers remind Jamie the usual age for this ritual is 14 or 15, he insists his son is ready, although Spike seems less certain about this, and mostly trying to please his father. Leaving his ailing mother Isla in the care of Spike’s grandfather, father and son load up their arrows, grab their bows and make the trek across the causeway at low tide to the mainland, with a four hour window before the tide covers the causeway blocks retreat.

You know something has to go awry but at first all goes well. Weirdly, while they are on the mainland, Jamie and Spike do not forage for supplies to supplement their meagre ones at the store, but instead mostly stick to the forest, hunting slow-moving zombies.

They come across some, pitiful fat slug-like zombies who crawl slowly across the ground but are still capable of infecting people if they manage to sneak up on one. Spike does make his first kill – shoot them in the neck, dad says – but a few more almost sneak up on dad while he is focused on coaching his young son. The pair encounter some faster-moving zombies and even spot a dreaded Alpha, a large fast zombie with more of a brain than the rest. There are harrowing moments and frightening mad dashes, and they are even forced to hide out in a structure, something they had avoided, and while hiding in an attic, catch sight of a puzzling huge bonfire in the distance, not something likely created by the zombies.

Eventually they do make it back to the causeway. Back on the island, the villagers have planned a celebration for Spike but the boy is both rattled by his experiences and his father’s bragging and exaggerating about his prowess as a zombie-killer, and sneaks off to see his mother, accidentally glimpsing something that rattles him even more. Back home with his grandfather, Spike learns something his father concealed from him, that the bonfire they saw was probably built by a doctor. When Spike, concerned about his sick mother, asks his father about it, the father insists that the doctor has gone mad and isn’t really a doctor anymore

Spike, unsettled by his experience on the mainland and even more by his father’s behavior goes on a quest to the mainland with his sick mother, hoping to find the doctor to cure her.

The doctor is played by Ralph Fiennes, in an excellent performance, although we have to wait quite a while for his appearance which is too brief overall. The rest of the cast is good too, especially young as Spike and the wonderful Jodie Comer, as the sick mother who is charmingly funny, strong-willed and capable in her moments of lucidity. Aaron Taylor-Johnson does a fine job as the father, trying to project an bravura image but revealing a selfishness underneath. A surprise character who makes a brief appearance is a Swedish sailor who was stranded on the mainland by a shipwreck and runs into Spike and Isla on their quest. Coming from Europe, where cell phones and other benefits of modern life still exist, he has strange conversations with young Spike who has known only the medieval-ish world he was born into, making for an interesting bit of post-apocalyptic commentary.

28 YEARS LATER has its moments, with high tension moments and scary zombie attacks and chases. but there is more that is unsettling and even disturbing in the non-zombie human story that unfolds in this post-apocalyptic world. However, the script has its problems, and not everything that happens really makes sense. For example, why would the villagers risk a trip to the mainland only to shoot zombies, and not forage for supplies, which a high-risk for low-yield decision. There are other odd missteps in logic (a pregnant zombie?), while other details are carefully thought-out. It gives the story an unevenness, which is exacerbated by it’s bit episodic nature, with different sections that seem rather disconnected, and finishing with a last scene that mostly just sets up for a sequel (who knows what they would call that one).

On the plus side, along with its fine cast, the film has beautiful, even haunting locations shots, as it was largely shot where it is set, with wonderful north and northeastern locations, although weirdly, they filmmakers chose to shoot on cell phones. The island of Lindisfarne, off the northeast coast of England and connected to the mainland by a low-tide causeway, stands in for the villagers’ island. The setting is lush, green and dotted with ruined castles, abbys and cottages, as well as more modern derelict buildings

28 YEARS LATER is mixed bag, likely to divide audiences, satisfying those who can’t get enough of its zombies more than some others. Still, there are fewer zombie scenes and less pure horror of that type, while it focuses more on the subtler horror of post-apocalyptic life. While it does feature a strong cast and lovely locations, it also has an unsettling, uncomfortable and disturbing non-zombie human story. Add to that, the film’s final sequence is pure set-up for yet another sequel, which also tends to undermine it, although that might be welcome news to those who crave more Rage virus zombies.

28 YEARS LATER opens in theaters on Friday, June 20, 2025.

RATING: 3 out of 4 stars

© Cate Marquis

MEN – Review

(L-R) Jessie Buckley and Rory Kinnear in MEN. Courtesy of A24.

A woman alone in a secluded old house, who is being terrorized, is a standard of horror films but director/writer Alex Garland crafts a far different, mind-bending film from that familiar premise. In MEN, toxic masculinity and patriarchy play a major part in the horror.

Alex Garland, whose credits include the scripts for 28 DAYS LATER and SUNSHINE, is a visionary filmmaker who has previously used science fiction to delve into philosophy and a dark side of technology in EX MACHINA, a film that touched on the classic theme of the male creator controlling a female creation, with references to Frankenstein, Pygmalion and the mechanical doll of The Tales of Hoffman. Now Garland turns to the horror genre and, likewise, MEN is no ordinary horror film, although it plays with many of the familiar tropes and types of the genre. On one level, it is a feverish nightmare, an unforgettable, queasy experience, but on another it is a symbolic-laden exploration of patriarchy and toxic masculinity, along with references to ancient folk symbols and myths surrounding lust, sex, fertility and birth.

The film opens with a shocking sight, of a man falling past a window. The falling man is James (Paapa Essiedu), the husband Harper (Jessie Buckley) was in the process of divorcing despite his emotionally-manipulative threats of suicide, although we don’t know if what we see is an accident or a suicide. Seeking a place to heal and grieve, Harper rents a manor house near a tiny village in the quiet English countryside, to be alone and process what has happened.

The stately old house is beautiful and the landscape around it is lush, green and idyllic, the perfect spot. Strolling up to the front door, Harper plucks an apple from a tree in the front yard. The biblical reference is not subtle and as she takes a bite from it, we feel a momentary disquieting shift. She enters the old mansion and begins to explore, and normalcy seems to return with the arrival of the genial owner of the house, Geoffrey (Rory Kinnear), a slightly awkward but likable country aristocratic type. As Geoffrey shows her around the house, he asks slightly intrusive questions about her personal life, questions she deflects while implying she is divorced rather an widowed. When the owner spots the partly-eaten apple on the kitchen counter, his ever-present smile fades, followed by the words “forbidden fruit,” but he quickly adds that he is joking, as the smile returns. We feel he isn’t and, in fact, disturbing things quickly follow.

Harper decides to take a walk in the intensely green woods around the mansion, which leads her to an abandoned old railroad tunnel, where she lingers, playing with echos. That is until she spots a strange man, naked and scratched, at the other end, who then follows her back to the house. Although the police take him away, the incident starts a chain of disturbing events, as the film ratchets up the tension.

What unfolds is a surreal, head-spinning horror film experience steeped in myth and archetypes of masculinity while exploring aspects of the connections between men and women. Garland keeps the tension high throughout, as events become increasingly disturbing and nightmarish, heavily laden with symbolism, much of it drawn from folk traditions, particularly the ancient Green Man and mysterious sexual female image Sheela-na-gig.

The acting is superb, particularly Kinnear, as is the film’s masterful use of framing, the wildly lush sets and locations, and gorgeous photography, all suffusing a film of unrelenting tension. Some scenes, particularly the mind-bending climax, are disturbing to watch and graphic. although not in the usual horror film way.

After the encounter in the woods, Harper faces a series of increasingly unsettling encounters with men in the village, who demonstrate an array of sexist, patriarchal and toxic masculinity behaviors. They all share a version of the same face, including a malevolent 9-year-old boy. While the manor owner is merely awkward, others are more offensive, with a police officer who dismisses Harper’s fears, or even sinister, like the threatening boy and a vicar who seems at first to offer sympathy but quickly shifts to sexist critique.

The men in the village are all played by Rory Kinnear, with the aid of various prosthetics, wigs and false teeth and plenty of nudity. It is a brave, impressive multiple role performance by the lauded British actor, who crafts distinctly different characters for each role and endured some daunting physical challenges for them. Kinnear is famous in Britain for his stage work and as a member of the Royal Shakespeare Company but he may be most familiar to movie audiences from his role in the Bond movies as Bill Tanner or supporting roles on TV shows like “Penny Dreadful” and many others.

Jessie Buckley, whose career is soaring, especially after her Oscar nomination for THE LOST DAUGHTER, is on screen nearly throughout the whole film. The film is a real acting tour-de-force by both Buckley and Kinnear, but while Buckley is excellent, this film may be a star-making turn for the gifted but lesser-known Rory Kinnear.

Although Harper is alone in this rural house, she frequently chats with her supportive friend Riley (Gayle Rankins) who sometimes offers to join her. Periodically, we see flashbacks to Harper’s troubled relationship with her late husband James, in a nice performance by Essiedu. Both sequences add to our understanding of Harper and the trauma she suffered, but her character is explored in less depth than might be expected.

Of course, as the title indicates, this film is about the men who surround and menace her, men who are symbolic, facets and archetypes rather than real individuals, representing aspects of masculinity and patriarchy. The film offers up both presentations of toxic masculinity and male privilege that have current day and recent historic reference, and ancient symbols of nature, sex, fertility and birth. But what exactly writer/director Garland is saying with all that is unclear, leaving it all to the interpretation of the viewer. The film is disturbing yet haunting, and puzzling, while it is also a polished, terrifying horror film.

MEN opens in theaters on Friday, May 20.

RATING: 3 out of 4 stars