SLIFF 2016 Interview – SEARCHING FOR HOME Producer Rita Marika Csapo-Sweet

searchingforhome-header

Interview conducted by Cate Marquis

“Searching for Home and Identity” is a free program with this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival, which includes documentary feature SEARCHING FOR HOME and documentary shorts ALL THAT REMAINS and STAIRWAY. The free event takes place Saturday, Nov. 12, 6:30pm at University of Missouri-St. Louis’  Gallery 210, and was also presented Saturday, Nov. 5, 6pm at UMSL’s Gallery 210. The program will be introduced by producer Dr. Rita Marika Csapo-Sweet.

Dr. Rita Marika Csapo-Sweet, associate professor of Media Studies at University of Missouri- St. Louis, has built a bond with Bosnian Muslim students over the years of teaching film, students who had lost their homes during the 1990s war and genocide.

Loss of home joined both professor and student in 2013. Csapo-Sweet’s beloved historic Dogtown home was destroyed by fire and that loss was followed a few months later by another tragedy,  the sudden death of her beloved husband, Dr. Fredrick Sweet, a Washington University professor.

ALL THAT REMAINS is a documentary short about Csapo-Sweet as she revisits her destroyed home and her year of loss, something she describes as a “house tour from hell.” The film is part of the SLIFF program “The Search for Home and Identity,” which Csapo-Sweet curated and includes the feature documentary SEARCHING FOR HOME and another documentary short STAIRWAY. Hari Secic, a former film student of  Csapo-Sweet through an exchange program with the University of Sarajevo, directs both the feature and the short about Csapo-Sweet’s home.  STAIRWAY the other documentary short is directed by Miroslav Mandic, another of her Bosnian students. Csapo-Sweet, who was producer on the films, will speak at the screening.

“All the films in this side-bar “Searching for Home and Identity” deal with post-war trauma; and coping with life in the face of almost insurmountable tragedy,” Csapo-Sweet said. “While many of the films are directed by or about events in Bosnia and Herzegovina, other films deal with disruption after trauma. These themes are universal and timeless.”

Csapo-Sweet describes “All That Remains” as a “house tour from Hell,” taking the viewer through the burnt shell while discussing her experience. The unique house had been built from materials from the 1904 World Fair, and its imposing white stone exterior made it a distinctive structure in the area. Along with her husband Fred, Csapo-Sweet had built a connection between the Jewish community and the Bosnian Muslims over the shared experience of genocide. Fred Sweet, who was Jewish, was working on a book about the role of medical doctor’s in genocide, a big part of which was about Dr. Carl Clauberg, who worked along-side Mengele in Auschwitz. “Fred received a Fulbright Fellowship to conduct research in Bosnia on that same subject in 2010. But he died before he could finish his research, so it’s up to me now,” Csapo-Sweet said.

“I mention during the interview [in ALL THAT REMAINS] a number of times that although our house-fire was a tragedy, our neighbors saved our lives by getting us out of the house in time,” she said. “How different that was, than what happened to the Bosnians (and Jews) where the neighbors were trying to kill them. We lost everything in the fire, and my husband died 4 months later.  But, what we went through palled by comparison.”

Hari Secic’s documentary “SEARCHING FOR HOME” focuses on Sead, a Bosnian Muslim survivor of the genocide at Sreberenica. Sead had moved to the U.S. as a refugee but after building a life in America, with a wife and kids, but he chose to move back to his childhood village, while his  family chose to remained in America. Director Secic had a short film in SLIFF in 2014 but this is his first feature.

“Many have characterized events in Bosnia and Herzegovina, as the worst genocide in Europe since the Holocaust,” Csapo-Sweet said. “The [St. Louis] Holocaust Museum and Learning Center has worked for years with the Bosnian community in St. Louis, and UMSL.”

SLIFF 2016 Review – LONG LIVE DEATH

longlivedeathheader

LONG LOVE DEATH screens Friday, Nov. 11 at 9:00pm at The Hi-Pointe Backlot as part of this year’s ST. Louis International Film Festival. Ticket information can be found HERE

In “Long Live Death,” a serial killer sedates his female victims and makes their murders look like suicides. When the body of another woman is found, Lt. Murot finally catches the culprit, appearing to end the deadly spree. But even after his arrest, the killer still exerts terrifying control over the situation, and Murot seems to play an unwitting part in his master plan. As detective and criminal play a cat-and-mouse game with the highest of stakes — a person’s life — Murot is forced to confront his own past and inner demons. A tense thriller, “Long Live Death” is a quasi-sequel to the same director’s “At the End of the Street” (2015 SLIFF), with both films inspired by the long-running German television series “Tatort (Scene of the Crime).”

Review of LONG LIVE DEATH by Dane Marti

Going from jazzy 1970’s opening titles which announce that this is a ‘Tatort’ production, the film bluntly and brilliantly shifts to a bleak noir landscape of murder. Soon, the viewer is in the grimy midst of a brutal crime scene and focuses on the dogged and pragmatic world  of a German detective. It won’t be too many years until his retirement, but he’s got more on his mind. As he briefs reporters on another senseless, grotesque crime, the viewer is shown,  through skillful editing and tight close ups, someone mysterious is in the media crowd. Is it the killer? A Voyeur?

The acting by Ulrich Tukur  ( playing the Detective Felix Murot ) has the perfect balance between realism and obsession. He’s great/
 Obviously, there are comparisons going to be made between U.S. films like Seven and The Hannibal Lecter films, but this modern serial killer noir stands on its own. It addresses such topics as Assisted Suicide and the nature of evil.

I don’t believe that I’ve seen any of the writer/director, Sebastian Marka’s other cinematic work, but this work is a professional production from top to bottom. Yes, it has blood, it has all the obligatory elements contained within so many other crime thrillers, but it entertainingly conveys grit and underlying horror with all the horror and power that a grim story can convey.
  I’ve read that this is simply one segment of an ongoing crime television show that airs in Europe and Germany. If you like old Film Noir, or the more recent branch of the psychologically dark style, this is a film that you should definitely see. And then, try to get some sleep. Ha.  This film is a foreign film that almost anyone would  enjoy: Quality.

 

 

SLIFF 2016 – Director Paul Verhoeven’s ELLE Screens Nov. 13th

elleheader

ELLE screens Sunday Nov. 13th at 5pm at The Plaza Frontenac as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival. Ticket information can be found HERE.

Paul Verhoeven, the iconic director of ROBOCOP and BASIC INSTINCT is back and at his provocative best in ELLE.  Michèle (Isabelle Huppert) seems indestructible: The head of a leading video-game company, she brings the same ruthless attitude to both her business and her love life. After she’s attacked in her home by an unknown assailant, Michèle reacts with her typically steely resolve by tracking down the man responsible. Both are soon drawn into a curious and thrilling game — a cat-and-mouse that threatens to spiral out of control at any moment. Variety raves: “You’ve never seen a rape-revenge fantasy quite like ELLE, not least because the rape, revenge and fantasy components of that subgenre have never been quite so fascinatingly disarranged. Knowingly incendiary but remarkably cool-headed, and built around yet another of Isabelle Huppert’s staggering psychological dissections, Paul Verhoeven’s long-awaited return to notional genre filmmaking pulls off a breathtaking bait-and-switch: Audiences arriving for a lurid slab of arthouse exploitation will be taken off-guard by the complex, compassionate, often corrosively funny examination of unconventional desires that awaits them.”

SLIFF 2016 – PO Screens November 13th

poheader
PO screens Sunday, Nov. 13 at 1:00pm at the Tivoli Theatre as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival.  Director John Asher and actor Julian Feder will be in attendance. Ticket information can be found HERE.
Based on a true story, PO tests the bonds of love between a grieving father and son. When David Wilson’s young wife falls victim to cancer, he is left a single working dad with the sole responsibility of caring for his autistic son. Patrick (Julian Feder), who prefers to be called Po, is a gifted but challenged child who was very close to his mother and unable to communicate his own sense of loss. As father and son struggle to deal with life after mom, they each begin to withdraw. David (Christopher Gorham) is consumed by the high-pressure job he’s close to losing, and Po copes with the bullying in his sixth-grade classroom by escaping into his magical fantasy world, the Land of Color, where he’s just a typical carefree boy with a rich cast of companions. The challenge of serving as the single parent of a special-needs child creates a growing divide between father and son, threatening to separate David and Po permanently.
Check out the trailer for PO:

SLIFF 2016 Interview: Bill Ferguson – Subject of the Documentary DREAM/KILLER

 ferg-header
 DREAM/KILLER screens Saturday, Nov. 12 at 7:30pm at Saint Louis U./Center for Global Citizenship (3672 West Pine Mall ) as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival. Bill Ferguson, the subject of the documentary, will be in attendance. This is a FREE event. 
Many St. Louisans likely have dim memories of the 2001 murder of Columbia (Mo.) Tribune sports editor Kent Heitholt. But for the Ferguson family, that tragic event has remained all too vivid. Convicted of the crime — which took place when he was a 17-year-old high-school student — Ryan Ferguson received a 40-year prison sentence in 2005. DREAM/KILLER, directed by Andrew Jenkstells the story of Ryan’s father, Bill Ferguson, as he sought to uncover the truth and overturn the verdict. This riveting chronicle of Bill’s decade-long pursuit to free his son and best friend features a cast of characters who represent both the best and the worst of the American judicial system: questionable district attorney-turned-judge Kevin Crane, who stubbornly insisted on Ryan’s guilt despite clear evidence to the contrary; high-powered Chicago attorney and wrongful-conviction specialist Kathleen Zellner, who joined Bill in his long quest for justice (she also represented Steven Avery of Netflix’s “Making a Murderer”); and sadly confused Chuck Erickson, who not only confessed to a murder based on a dream but also claimed that former classmate and friend Ryan served as his co-conspirator. And at the film’s vital heart is Bill Ferguson, who uses his self-taught investigation skills and relentless creativity to give his son a slim and hard-earned chance at freedom.
ferg3
Bill Ferguson took the time to talk to We Are Movie Geeks about the film DREAM/KILLER and about his son Ryan.
Interview conducted by Tom Stockman November 12th, 2016

Tom Stockman: You’ve been touring with this documentary about your son.

Bill Ferguson: Yes the documentary is really about me and my and the things I did to help free my son.

TS: Has your son Ryan been touring with the documentary as well?

BF: He’s been to a couple of film festivals but not as many as I have. The film is available online. You can download it on iTunes.

TS: Your son served almost 10 years for a crime he did not commit to deserve all this time in Missouri?

BF: It was all in Missouri yes, but what people don’t realize is that while they say that he served eight years, it was really a total of 10. He spent over a year and a half in the county jail. Serving time in the county jail is far worse than even a maximum-security prison.

ferg9

TS: Why is that?

BF: The conditions are much worse. The guards are paid less and are less professional. The food is worse. The privileges are minimal. For example, in the entire year and a half he was in there, he only went outside three times.

TS: That’s terrible. So, then he went to a penitentiary.

BF: That’s right, in Jefferson City.

TS: And you were living in Columbia Missouri, which isn’t too far. Did you go and visit your son as often as you could?

BF: Absolutely.

TS: Do you have other children?

BF: Yes, I have an older daughter. She’s been living in the Washington DC area. She would come and visit Ryan when she could.

ferg5

TS: What was it like visiting your son in prison where he was serving time for a crime that you and so many others knew that he did not commit?

BF: It was shocking. During that year and a half, he was in the county jail though, we could only visit him for two hours once a week. In the penitentiary, we could see him three or four times a week, for up to four hours at a time. We could have face to face contact, with a hug before and after, whereas in the county jail, there was no contact allowed at all. You had to talk on the phone through glass. So, the penitentiary was a lot nicer than where he had been, but it was still shocking and appalling.

TS: I’ll bet. How would you describe your sons attitude about being there?

BF: Initially he was in a state of shock. He was very upset. But then he realized he had to adjust to his predicament and make the best of it. He started reading everything he could get his hands on. He increased his vocabulary and his understanding of history and really became a very good student. And we worked on his case together.

TS: What was your son like before all this trouble happened?

BF: He was an excellent kid. To give you an example, a typical teenager might see his parents at the mall or something and not want to be seen with them. If we would see him out in public with his friends, he would wave us over to him and give us a big hug. He was always like that. He was always upbeat and always positive, never got into any kind of trouble. He was an average student and a very good athlete, just an all-around good

ferg4

TS: How did prison change Ryan?

BF: It made him become more appreciative of his freedom. He became more focused academically, and he started working out. He has an incredible physique now. His physique is so impressive that he’s written a book about that, A book he wrote while he was in prison that’s been published and has been very successful.

TS: Is the book about the crime or just about physical health?

BF: It’s about physical health, but in the environment of being in the prison system and what you have to do to be successful.

TS: Does he write about his case in the book?

BF: Ever so slightly. He talks about his relationships with the other prisoners and how he focused on spending much of his time in prison working out and educating himself. He knew he was going to get out and he wanted to prepare himself whenever that time came.

ferg6

TS: Where does this criminal case stand now?

BF: Ryan’s sentence has been completely vacated. We’re approaching the third anniversary of him being out of prison.

TS: Where is Charles Erickson, who was also convicted of this murder?

BF: Unfortunately, Charles is still in prison but there’s really no evidence to hold him there. That’s just the way attorney generals operate all across the country. They do not want to release him.

TS: It’s a very interesting story. Whose idea was it to make this documentary?

BF: That was Andrew Jenks’ idea.

TS: How closely did you work with director Andrew Jenks on this project?

BF: Very closely. We worked with the 48 Hours TV show initially. They were the ones that really put us on the map. Dateline picked up the story as well, and other news outlets and media sources did too. Andrew Jenks had come across this and contacted us. By that time, we had a lot of experience with being filmed because we had been on three episodes of 48 Hours and three episodes of Dateline, so that’s a lot of exposure. Andrew is Ryan’s age and they got along perfectly, and I got along with him as well. They spent a lot of time with us and got to know us, whereas the networks worked on a tight schedule.

ferg8

TS: Is there much footage from these networks stories incorporated into the documentary?

BF: There some, but not a lot.

TS: What do you think of the final film?

BF: I think it’s excellent. I think Andrew captured the essence of the story. There’s one part that’s in black-and-white that has animated drawings showing what prison is like. The artist that drew the animation for that portion really highlighted just how horrible being in a maximum security prison is.

TS: Is the crime re-created it all in the film?

BF: No.

TS: Has there been talk of a narrative movie being made about the story?

BF: Yes there has.

TS: Who would you like to see play you in the film?

BF: I have no idea. I haven’t given that much thought. We’ll leave that to the experts.

TS: You’ve been touring film fest with this film. Have you been happy with the questions that people are asking you at the Q and A’s?

BF: Yes, very happy. People always have good questions.

ferg7

TS: What’s next?

BF: Ryan has just completed a television series called Unlocking the Truth. There are eight episodes. He also hopes to write a book. Our goal is to expose and enlighten the public on how the system actually works in terms of prisons and conspiracy, things that people are unaware of until they find themselves in that situation. Right now, we’re working on about six different murder cases where we believe that the accused is innocent.

TS: Is this becoming full-time job for you or are you still working a day job, or are you retired?

BF: No, I still have my day job. The more you know about this, and the know the more you know about prisons, the more you want to help, but you can’t let it consume you. There has to be a balance between our lives and helping people who are in prison. You have to be very conscious of your time.

TS: You and Ryan were able to go to the Super Bowl last year. What was that like?

BF: Oh my gosh, that was phenomenal. I never dreamed I’d ever go to the Super Bowl.  It’s so expensive. Ryan called me up one day and said “Hey Dad. Are you going to the Super Bowl this year?” I said no, and he said “How would you like to go? I’ve got tickets. They’re flying us down and putting us up. Everything is paid for!” So, that’s exactly what happened and it was a great game. Our sponsors were fantastic. It could not have gone any better. Just spending that kind of time with Ryan was tremendous.

TS: I’m glad. Best of luck with the film and congratulations on all you’ve done and the success you’ve had helping your son.

BF: Thank you

SLIFF 2016 Review – THE HAPPYS

happys-header

THE HAPPYS screens Saturday, Nov. 12 at 7:00pm and Sunday, Nov. 13 at 3:30pm. Both screenings at at The Hi-Pointe Backlot.  Director John Serpe, actress Amanda Bauer, and actor/producer Will Bethencourt will all be in attendance. Ticket information for the Nov. 12th show can be found HERE. Ticket information for the Nov. 13th show can be found HERE

When 21-year-old Tracy (Amanda Bauer) walks in on boyfriend Mark (Jack DePew), a newly minted movie star, having sex with a man, she immediately decides to leave him. But after assessing her limited options, Tracy returns with a deal: If he agrees to marry her, she’ll forget the incident ever happened. Mark accepts her terms, but neither of them fully understands the sacrifices that both will have to make. As their relationship deteriorates, Tracy manages to compensate for the troubles in her marriage by befriending the quirky residents of her Los Feliz neighborhood: Sebastian (Rhys Ward), a troubled recluse; Luann (Janeane Garofalo), a former child star and true free spirit; Krista (“The Walking Dead’s” Melissa McBride), Mark’s hard-charging talent manager; Jonathan (Stepen Guarino), a gay magazine reporter; and Ricky (Arturo del Puerto), a hot Mexican with a failing food truck. Discovering her true sense of self — and a passion for cooking — Tracy ends up serving as a catalyst that forces them all to grow and to connect in unforeseen ways. “The Happys” features an original score by Wilco multi-instrumentalist Patrick Sansone.

Review of THE HAPPYS by Stephen Tronicek

Another name for Tom Gould and John Serpe’s THE HAPPYS would be “A Comedy of Errors for the American Dream,” in that what makes it funny is the fact that it continually has people making mistakes in the interest of gaining their own proposed American Dream. The main character, Tracy (Amanda Bauer) wants to live a happy life with her boyfriend (Jack DePew), even after catching him in bed with a man. The boyfriend, Mark, wants to live the life of a gay movie star, even if the movies he’s starring in seems to lack competence in many ways, and his orientation could ruin his career. Sebastian is attempting to live a quiet life inside of having food delivered to him and tanning in the backyard, a life of loneliness, yet affluence. In fact, the title seems to suggest an irony. The Happys isn’t about happy people. It’s about people in the desperate struggle of being what they think is happy.

That’s where the true dynamic of THE HAPPYS becomes special. At first glance, the film seems like a typical L.A. young people comedy, fueled by situations that slowly grow into a thinly veiled narrative laced together on jokes, but THE HAPPYS opts to add a spectacular layer of irony to everything in the implications of all the characters actions.This makes it instantly funny when characters having received what they think is happiness start to act against their own interest to simply sustain this and forces the hand of the directors and actors to take a more “show don’t tell” route that seems oddly absent from many comedies. Through their actions, Tracy and the others reveal an incredible amount about who they are just by acting, which keeps the narrative surprising and the emotional journey everyone goes through honest. This isn’t a film that wraps everything up nicely, but it does so with a sense of hope that its characters will find happiness.

THE HAPPYS is a very simple film. As much depth is present, this is a film of effortlessness, easily going through its runtime. The deeper material never bogs down the jokes as they blend into the one ironically fun film about what it means to be happy.

SLIFF 2016 Interview: Rutger Hauer – Co-star of DRAWING HOME

rutger-header

DRAWING HOME screens Thursday, Nov. 10 at 6:30pm at The Tivoli Theater as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival. Ticket information can be found HERE. Lead actors Juan Riedinger and Julie Lynn Mortenson will be in attendance as well as producers Allan Neuwirth and Margarethe Baillou.

In 1920s Boston, East Coast debutante Catharine Robb (newcomer Julie Lynn Mortensen) is dating the most eligible bachelor in the world, John D. Rockefeller III. Her future seems set: a dream life in the upper echelons of society. But Catherine finds her careful plans upended when she meets a young painter, Peter Whyte (Juan Riedinger), from one of the most beautiful places on Earth, the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Although their worlds are polar opposites, a mutual love of art draws them together. They soon face a universal question: Can you find “home” in another person? Inspired by the true story of the central couple, “Drawing Home” features a cast that includes Kate Mulgrew (“Orange Is the New Black”), Emmy winner Peter Strauss (“Rich Man, Poor Man”), Kristin Griffith, and Wallace Shawn. The film was shot on location in Canada’s gorgeous Banff and Yoho National Parks.

drawingjome3

Also co-starring in DRAWING HOME is veteran actor Rutger Hauer, who has an international reputation for playing everything from romantic leads to action heroes to sinister villains. Hauer began his career in Dutch films, often collaborating with director Paul Verhoeven on films such as SPETTERS, THE SOLDIER OF ORANGE, and TURKISH DELIGHT. Hauer came to Hollywood in the early ’80s and has co-starred in many popular films including NIGHTHAWKS, BLADE RUNNER, THE HITCHER, LADYHAWKE, and HOBO WITH A SHOTGUN. In DRAWING HOME, Hauer plays wildlife artist Carl Rungius.

Rutger Hauer took the time to talk to We Are Movie Geeks about his career and his new film DRAWING HOME.

Interview conducted by Tom Stockman November 8th, 2016.

Tom Stockman: Have you seen the final cut of DRAWING HOME?

Rutger Hauer: Yes I have. I know it took them a while to finally get it edited, but I did see it and I was very impressed with it.

TS: What attracted you to the role of wildlife artist Carl Rungius? 

RH: The producer had called me and asked me if I wanted to work on this film. I Skyped the director Markus Rupprecht and read the script and I thought this character was very strong. I liked the script and I thought I could do something with it   He was a first-time director and he was wonderful to work with. Everybody was. It was an easy decision to make.

TS: Did you enjoy filming up there in the Canadian Rockies?

RH: Yes, it’s beautiful there. You can’t describe the Canadian Rockies in just a few words.

TS: Was it cold?

RH: Very cold. Crispy.

drawingjome8

TS: Had you filmed in that part of the world before?

RH: I’ve been there. I’ve mostly been up there to ski though. I participated once in a VIP skiing race right there in Banff, but I’ve never filmed a movie in that part of the world.

TS: Did you do a lot of research on this artist Carl Rungian before you played him?

RH: Not really. I just took the script and the director and I talked about what he needed from me and I followed his hand. And that was enough. I did look at some books of paintings done by him but we didn’t have a lot of prep time. I saw a picture of him and I mentioned to somebody that it would be great if I could wear a coat similar to what he was wearing in that photo. They had the coat on the set the next day.

TS: Do you enjoy playing real life characters?

RH: Absolutely. It doesn’t get better than playing someone with a real history.

TS: Let’s talk about the scene near the end of the film where your character looks at the camera and recites a poem. I interviewed producers Allan Neuwirth and Margarethe Baillou and they said that you had written that poem.

RH: Yes, it was after I finished filming my scenes. I had been looking for a poem by an American Indian. I found a good one and tried to connect with the writer of this poem, but could never get a response from him. I decided to write a poem myself that expressed some of the same things. After I filmed, I went to the set to say goodbye to everyone, and I mentioned to the producers that I had written this poem. They asked if they could film me reciting it, so that’s what they did. It made sense being in the film and it was nice that it ended up in the final version.

rut2

TS: It does fit right in. Were you surprised that it ended up in the final film?

RH: Very surprised.

TS: Have you ever played a poet in a film?

RH: No, I’ve played artists before but never a poet. I do love poetry and now and then I like to write my own.

TS: Some of your dialogue in BLADE RUNNER is somewhat poetic. Did you write any of your own dialogue for that film?

RH: Just one line, but it’s the one line that so many remember.

TS: “All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain”. That’s yours isn’t it?

RH: Yes. I’m so glad that so many people are able to recite that.

rut3
Rutger Hauer in BLADE RUNNER

TS: Have you ever been to St. Louis before?

RH: No, I haven’t really been to the Midwest or southern part of the United States. I’ve never even been to Texas or New Orleans. There are so many places I would like to visit. St. Louis is still on my list.

TS: One of the other films that is playing at the St. Louis international film for festival is Paul Verhoeven’s new film ELLE Have you seen that?

RH: Oh wonderful. No, I have not seen that yet. I’m very curious and I’m dying to see it. I’ve heard good things about it.

rut4
Rutger Hauer in Paul Verhoeven’s FLESH + BLOOD

TS: You collaborated with the director Paul Verhoeven on Dutch films several times early in your career but you haven’t worked with him since FLESH + BLOOD in 1986. Would you like to work with him again?

RH: Yes, we’re both trying to make that work. We both want to.

TS: What is the Dutch film industry like today?

RH: We have a fund that comes from the government that works for filmmakers trying to get their start. They are making some films there. I will say, even though I am Dutch, I don’t think they travel very well. Filmmakers struggle with the fact that if it’s not Dutch enough, they won’t get the money to make it. I’m fighting them on that, hoping that they will open up a bit. We need to go out into the world with our films.

TS: When you were growing up in the Netherlands, was it easy for you to see American films?

RH: Yes it was.

TS: Did you have some favorite American movie stars when you were young?

RH: Yes, I really admired Burt Lancaster and Tony Curtis and Kirk Douglas. I was a big fan of Marlon Brando. When I was very young, I was a big fan of Audie Murphy, who mostly did war movies. There were also a lot of French movies that played in the Netherlands at that time. It was nice. There was always a lot of movies for me to see growing up.

TS: You have directed a couple of short films. Have you ever had the desire to direct a feature yourself?

RH: Yes. We’re working on a script now that I hope to put in production and direct myself next year. It’s a good script. I think we’re really going to go somewhere with it.

TS: That sounds interesting. What genre will this film be?

RH: I’d call it a thriller. A psychological thriller.

TS: I’ve read that they are currently filming the sequel to BLADE RUNNER. Were you approached to be involved in that project?

RH: No I was not.

 TS: Is that something you would like to have done?

RH: No. You have to be kind though. You really just can’t say yes or no to anything that you haven’t read. I don’t know what they’re going to do with this new BLADE RUNNER. I’m certainly curious, but I’ll just have to wait and see. I don’t know what to think of it really.

TS: What’s next for Rutger Hauer?

RH: I Don’t know yet. I’ve got some projects in the works, but I’m not filming anything right now. Everything is still above ground.

TS: Very good. Well I really enjoyed your performance in DRAWING HOME, and I’ve enjoyed you in so many films over the decades. Good luck with all of your future projects.

RH: Thanks a lot. I’ve enjoyed talking to you

SLIFF 2016 – THE RENDEZVOUS Screens November 11th

reendezvousheader

THE RENDEZVOUS Screens  Friday, Nov. 11 at 7:15pm at The Tivoli Theater a part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival. Director Amin Matalqa will be in attendance. Ticket information can be found HERE

The Jordan-shot THE RENDEZVOUS places a developing romance between Jewish-American doctor Rachel (Stana Katic of “Castle”) and Arab-American government bureaucrat Jake (Raza Jeffrey of “Homeland”) against a vivid backdrop of intrigue and adventure. After Rachel’s treasure-hunting brother dies in the Middle East, the pair travels across the globe in an attempt to untangle the mysteries surrounding his death. But they find themselves unexpectedly hunted by a doomsday group, the Armageddonites, who believe Rachel and Jake possess an ancient script discovered by her brother — an artifact that could bring about the end of days. Caught in the middle of a plot to hasten the extinction of mankind, Rachel and Jake now find that they’re required not only to solve a murder but also to save the world. In the process, they make a far more personal discovery, learning that treasure is where you find it.

SLIFF 2016 – Kevin Wilmott Teaches a Master Class on Narrative Screenwriting November 12th

kevinwillmott-screenwriting-header

Kevin Willmott is a professor of film at the University of Kansas and a filmmaker known for work focusing on black issues including writing and directing NINTH STREET, C.S.A.: THE CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA and THE ONLY GOOD INDIAN. His  film DESTINATION PLANET NEGRO screened at The St. Louis International Film Festival in 2013. Read my interview with Kevin Wilmott from 2013 HERE

confederate-2
C.S.A.: THE CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA

Kevin will be back at this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival to teach a Master Class on Narrative Screenwriting for Independent film on Saturday November 12th at 1pm. This is a FREE event and takes place at Washington University’s West Campus Library (7425 Forsyth Blvd. Basement, 7425 Forsyth Blvd. Basement). 

destinationpn3
DESTINATION PLANET NEGRO

Filmmaker Kevin Willmott provides an overview of screenwriting, with an emphasis on problem-solving, low-budget filmmaking, and understanding how studio writing works. The master class serves as an opportunity both for seasoned writers to discuss their screenplays and for beginners to learn the nuts-and-bolts of starting a project. Willmott is the co-writer of Spike Lee’s “Chi-Raq,” which screens at SLIFF. His films as a writer-director include “C.S.A.: The Confederate States of America,” “The Only Good Indian,” “Destination Planet Negro,” and “Jayhawkers.” Willmott is an associate professor in the Film Studies Department of Kansas University.

kevin_wilmott_crop_t640

 

 

SLIFF Interview: Musician Stace England on WITHIN OUR GATES and Oscar Micheaux

staceinterview-header

The 1920 silent film WITHIN OUR GATES screens as part of The St. Louis International Film Festival Saturday, Nov. 12 at 7:30pm at Webster University’s Moore Auditorium. The film will be accompanied by Stace England and the Screen Syndicate, who play an album of songs inspired by Oscar Micheaux, writer-director of WITHIN OUR GATES. The screening is sponsored by Renee Hirshfield. Ticket information can be found HERE

As part of the 25th-anniversary celebration, The St. Louis International Film Festival reprises a special event from our 2009 edition by screening “Within Our Gates,” writer-director Oscar Micheaux’s impassioned response to D.W. Griffith’s “Birth of a Nation.” The film shines a revealing light on the racism of U.S. society, provocatively including scenes of lynching and attempted rape. Micheaux was a pioneering African-American filmmaker and novelist whose career stretched from the silent era through the 1940s. “Within Our Gates,” one of the oldest surviving “race” films, was thought lost until a print was discovered in Spain in 1990 and restored by the Library of Congress in 1992. This screening features a new restoration that offers an even more faithful approximation of the film as originally released. SLIFF has again invited Cairo, Ill.’s Stace England & the Salt Kings to play the original score the group created for the 2009 presentation. The band will also offer a few selections from its album “The Amazing Oscar Micheaux,” whose songs were inspired by the filmmaker’s life and work.

Screen Syndicate is a side project of Southern Illinois-based Americana band Stace England and the Salt Kings. The band has performed at numerous film festivals in the U.S. and Europe — appearing three times at SLIFF in the past — with shows about and Cairo, Ill. And the show about pioneering African-American filmmaker Oscar Micheaux once before in 2009.

Stace England hails from southern Illinois and found his creative footing in Chicago during the early ’90s with House Afire, one of the first country/roots bands in what was to become a very vibrant alt-country scene. England returned to southern Illinois and recorded a project of aggressive folk material under the name Tecumseh, releasing the well-received “Bearings” in 1995. His next musical adventure was with the alt/slasher/country-rock outfit Jubilee Songbirds, which released the eclectic “Birds of North America” (Western Front) in 1997. England released his first solo record, “Peach Blossom Special” (Relay) in 1999, and a power pop CD in 2003, “Lovey Dovey ALL the Time” (Gnashville Sounds).

Stace Englandtook the time to answer some questions for We Are Movie Geek before the Oscar Micheaux presentation at The St. Louis International Film Festival

Interview conducted by Tom Stockman

Tom Stockman: What have you guys been up to in the two years since you were here in St. Louis with your Roberta Collins program?

Stace England: We’ve been finishing the CD about Roberta Collins and that has taken longer than our normal cycle because everyone in the band is so busy these days.  Also the subject matter and songs have led the production toward more grandiose ideas like big vocals, lots of harmonies and intricate guitar work.  It’s not quite a “Chinese Democracy” time frame like the Axl only version of Guns and Roses but every time we finish a section new ideas crop up.  We’re going to keep riding it out but do want to complete the record for some shows next year.

TS: How did you get the idea to incorporate movie figures into your music?

SE: The accidental discovery of Oscar Micheaux and our subsequent astonishment at his life story led us to do a CD about his films and life and with that project we began to play a lot of film festivals.  We’ve really enjoyed it because many of these festivals, especially one like SLIFF, are very well organized and very enjoyable to play.  People who like film and attend these festivals are generally knowledgeable, open minded and fun to be around.  Those experiences led us to consider more film oriented music and there are countless interesting subjects to consider.

TS: Tell me about the creative process for scoring a film like WITHIN OUR GATES.

SE: We spend a lot of time watching and absorbing the film multiple times.  We want to see how it hits us in the gut and then work though what comes out of that.  Of course you’re filtering things through your own set of lenses, and we’re an Americana type band, or I guess we were at that time.  The film felt earthy and rootsy to us.  Many of the characters are from the deep south and I think the score reflects that.

TS: Will you be performing songs with lyrics in addition to the score, or does the score itself have lyrics?

SE: Our score does not have lyrics but after the film but we will be performing several songs from our Micheaux CD and show clips from those films.  It’s likely we’ll be doing “The Symbol of the Unconquered,” another amazing film released just after Within Our Gates which includes scenes of the Klan and Micheaux poking fun at some of D.W. Griffith’s camera angles from “The Birth of a Nation.”  “Body and Soul” was Paul Robeson’s first film and even watching five minutes of his commanding presence on screen is something to see.  We also thought we’d do one of the later films, “Lying Lips” which is one of Micheaux’s penny pinched talkies.

TS: Tell me about Oscar Micheaux and how you came to write music about him? When did you first become aware of him?

SE: I discovered Micheaux in 2008 browsing the non-fiction new books section at the library in Carbondale, Illinois.  I picked up Patrick McGilligans’ great book, “Oscar Micheaux: the Great and Only” which is what what Micheaux reportedly called himself.  Patrick has since become a good friend and he wrote the liner notes for our CD.  Micheaux’s picture is quite compelling, then I opened the book and the first chapter is “1884 – 1900 Metropolis, Illinois” which is near where we live.  I was completely knocked flat by his astonishing life story and very surprised I’d never heard of him.  The songs began to flow quickly after the first reading.

TS: Is the fact that you and he are both from Southern Illinois a reason you were compelled to write music about him?

SE: Yes.  We consider him a very important person from the region and a fearless hero and role model in many ways.  We’re very proud he was a southern Illinoisan early in his life.

TS: Have you see many of his other films besides WITHIN OUR GATES or read any of his novels? How many of his films are extant?

SE: Yes.  One of the first things we did was to try and find all of his surviving films.  Historians vary slightly on the number of films he produced but it was likely an incredible forty four or so.  Only twelve survive and we found a small collector/vendor in Portland, Oregon who had acquired all of them over many years.  We got all the films and watched them in chronological order, something we also did with all the Roberta Collins films.   That method really gives you a good feel for the arc of someone’s career.  I have also read all of his novels.  The similar plot in several, as was also used in his first film “The Homesteader” is psychologically interesting and numerous writers have explored that.

TS: Have you been in touch with any of his ancestors?

SE: Yes.  A distant relative contacted me shortly after the release of our CD and connected me with some other family members.  They are both proud of Micheaux and appreciative of anyone who helps highlight his legacy.  So we’re greatly honored by that.

TS: Why do you think Oscar Micheaux has been so forgotten?

SE: Micheaux had been largely forgotten late in his life, primarily because a new generation of African American writers and press were only aware of his increasingly penny pinched talking films, which were very poorly produced and probably somewhat embarrassing to the new kids on the block.  They didn’t know about “Within Our Gates,” “The Homesteader,” “Body and Soul” and other films that were important, envelope pushing and ground breaking.  When Micheaux came out of retirement from filmmaking and released “The Betrayal” in 1948, yet another retelling of his homesteader story it was panned by everyone regardless of skin color.  In addition, films like “Within Our Gates” and “The Symbol of the Unconquered” were lost for decades and only rediscovered in Europe in the 1990’s.  So no one really knew about his vital importance as filmmaker early in his career.

TS: Will you be speaking about Oscar Micheaux at the event?

SE: We won’t be speaking officially but we are available to answer questions and the film often generates many.

TS: How do the portrayals of African Americans in Micheaux’s films differ than the way they were portrayed in Hollywood films from the same period?

SE: Early in his career beginning in 1919 African Americans, or whites playing African Americans like in “The Birth of a Nation” were essentially walking stereotypes that more often than not fit racist narratives.  There were other African American filmmakers active slightly before Micheaux like The Lincoln Motion Picture Company formed in 1916.  Lincoln was making short films that generally showed blacks in a positive light.  Micheaux was the first to make full length films and starting with “Within Our Gates” began to show the truth of African American life as he saw it.  In addition to to heroic characters Micheaux included thieves, gamblers, grifters and complacent clergy in it for the money.  This upset a lot of people who thought he should “uplift the race” by showing only positive role models.  Many of the African American companies including Lincoln sprang up and died out quickly, but one of the most remarkable things about Micheaux is that he was able to keep it going, and show characters one would rarely see in a Hollywood film.  They were doctors, policemen, detectives and and successful business people.  People who disparage his later work forget that Micheaux was still making films thousands of people wanted to see, because they simply could not see that reality in Hollywood productions.  In other words, they’d rather see a poorly produced Micheaux film to anything coming out of the larger studios that mainly relegated people to offensive stereotypes.  When Micheaux saw “Imitation of Life” in 1934 he was angered and felt he could do a much better job.  He released “God’s Stepchildren” in 1938 which is a similar story line, and I greatly prefer it.  It’s gritter, more moving and probably much closer to the reality of what African Americans faced at the time regarding skin color within their community, the heartbreak of “passing” and the fear of discovery.

TS: Is this “new restoration” of WITHIN OUR GATES the same print you accompanied in 2009?

SE: The cut is slightly different but basically the same.  One of the challenges with the film is that it was lost for decades until a single print was found in Madrid in 1990 with Spanish intertitles.  Those were translated back to English so we’re not sure of the exact language.  Also Micheaux’s films were constantly chopped up and edited to satisfy censors, meet run time requirements and for various other reasons.  So we really don’t know what the original film may have completely looked like.  All restorations have made attempts to stick to Micheaux’s original vision.

TS: How do you think WITHIN OUR GATES plays to today’s audiences?

SE: It’s an interesting question and the answer is that it plays well, and generally intrigues people enough to want to know more about Micheaux and see more of his work.  What’s astonishing to us is that the film actually made it onto movie screens in the United States in 1920.  So we encourage people to mentally transport themselves to that time period when watching the film.   It’s so far out on the on the envelope it’s almost beyond the realm of what’s actually possible.  The lynching scene alone would be daring and controversial if it was shot in 2016.  One of the questions we asked ourselves as we revisited the film recently was how did he get white actors at the time to participate in some of these scenes?  He must have been one persuasive individual and a force to be reckoned with.   It’s mind blowing really.

TS: Is there another movie figure that you perhaps have in mind for a future movie project? When I interviewed you two years ago, you mentioned Joseph Cotton.

SE: Right now the first goal is to complete the Roberta Collins CD and do some shows with that material.  Cotton is someone we find endlessly fascinating, starring in film after magnificent film for a long period and then as you’ve pointed out, reduced to schlock stuff to keep working later in life.  And we may encounter another compelling character.  We like fairly obscure subjects like Micheaux and Collins that people have to reach for a little.  On the latest project it would have been much better career wise do so something about Pam Grier for example.  We found Roberta’s story much more compelling, even though she’s virtually unknown.  So was Micheaux’s, but his keeps rising a little year after year.  You can’t compare the two in terms of importance, Micheaux wins that hands down.  But both are very interesting human dramas and that’s what keeps us exploring.