We Are Movie Geeks All things movies… as noted by geeks.

June 24, 2009

WAMG Interviews Kyle, Brian & Kel from ‘Easier With Practice’

easierwithpractice2

During my time attending the 2009 CineVegas Film Festival, I managed to get some time to sit down with director Kyle Patrick Alvarez and stars Brian Geraghty and Kel O’Neill of ‘Easier With Practice‘. One of the best films of the festival, we talk about their experience, their inspiration and what went on during the making of this fine film.

I want to apologize for the shakiness of the video. Due to technical difficulties with our HD camera, we had to rely on our emergency backup Flip Mino camera to shoot the interview. Otherwise, enjoy!

June 19, 2009

‘World’s Greatest’ Red Band Trailer for ‘Dad’s Day

worlds greatest dad

Hulu really is taking over the world.   Not only is Alec Baldwin extremely convincing in that Superbowl commercial, the site has got first dibs on the new red band trailer for ‘World’s Greatest Dad.’

I was lucky enough to catch this movie at CineVegas earlier this week, and I will have my review for it up soon enough.   I will say that it is sick and twisted in all the best ways, and it’s taking me some time to get my head all the way around it to talk about it in full detail.   Jody Hill sure seemed to like it.   God, that guy is fidgety in a movie theater.

Anyway, check out the red band trailer for this latest comedy directed by Bobcat Goldthwait:

‘World’s Greatest Dad’ comes out on August 21st in limited theaters.

Check out Scott’s rave review of the film from Sundance right here!

Source: Hulu

June 18, 2009

CineVegas 2009: Day Two Video-Blog

This is the second video blog from CineVegas. It features red-carpet interviews with Michael Jai White and Scott Sanders from ‘Black Dynamite’ and a Q&A with director Duncan Jones for his new film ‘Moon’. Check, Check it out. Keep an eye out for day three coming soon.

Cinevegas Day Two from Anthony Meadows on Vimeo.

June 17, 2009

CineVegas Review: ‘Adam’

adammovie

It’s sort of become an unofficial unstated tradition that most movies featuring a character with some form of neurological disorder or handicap usually miss their mark, or in many cases simply fall flat on their faces. More often than not, the majority of movies that shed light on the topic of people living such lives shed the kind of light that mock or disrespect those afflicted with these conditions. ‘Deuce Bigalow’ makes fun of several including narcolepsy and Tourette Syndrome (a popular comical target) for example, but the list goes on. And for what, to make us laugh?

I prefer the rare film that takes subject matters such as these and constructs a smart and meaningful story depicting these lives and opening the viewer’s eyes to circumstances they themselves have not been privileged to endure and overcome. ‘Adam’ joins the select list of quality films that tell respectful and worthwhile stories of people with neurological conditions such as Rain Man, I Am Sam, Tic Code and House of Cards, to name a few.

Writer and director Max Mayer (Better Living) manages to capture this essence of daily life for an adult with Asperger’s Syndrome, taking us on a journey one day at a time through Adam’s struggle to adapt to his community of neuro-typicals and introduces us to the process by which he interacts and understands the world around him. Hugh Dancy (Confessions of a Shopaholic) delivers a commendable performance as Adam, pulling us into his mind and allowing us a glimpse of how alien the emotions and communication of others around him must feel at times. Interactions that the rest of us take for granted are difficult for Adam to grasp and at times the jokes and sarcasm of our conversations are misunderstood.

What I found particularly enjoyable about ‘Adam’ was that his life isn’t perfect, but he manages to adapt. The story is realistic and filled with the ups and downs that come with real life, but still manages to incorporate an an almost fairy tale like quality that mimics real life, that feeling of when things seem just right but then fall apart without any notice. That’s what life is actually like. Things don’t always, perhaps rarely work out as planned and this fact of life is no different for people that society sees as being “different.” If anything, these moments are more abundant.

‘Adam’ tells the story of a 29-year old man with Asperger’s Syndrome whose father has just passed away and must now learn to live on his own in New York. Adam has never lived alone, never traveled outside of his neighborhood alone and soon finds himself without a job to pay for the mortgage on his father’s house. Adam has one true friend in his life, a friend of his late father’s named Harlan who works as a locksmith and does his best to keep an eye on Adam and be there for him when needed. This is a two-way street however, as Harlan finds great wisdom pass through Adam’s lips to him as well.

The heart of the story develops as Adam meets his new neighbor, a single teacher named Beth played by Rose Byrne (Knowing). She is a kind, open-minded woman who quickly develops an interest in getting to know Adam, but one that slowly grows into something more as she realizes Adam holds qualities she admires despite his differences. The struggle for them both as they pursue a relationship neither knows what to expect of, is that they both have a lot to learn from each other and must work together to communicate their feelings.

This is not a sappy, story book kind of romance that’s filled with your typical rom-com tendencies. ‘Adam’ has more than the average amount of hardship that occurs in the lives of Adam and Beth. The struggle isn’t focused entirely on Beth trying to understand Adam, but branches out to find Adam struggling to understand Beth and her family, and Beth’s family struggling to understand Adam. In the end, Adam and Beth must both make important decisions about their relationship and their lives and the ending is satisfies on both ends of the emotional scale.

Additional quality performances are delivered by Peter Gallagher as Beth’s father, Amy Irving as her mother, Frankie Faison as Harlan and a welcome face from the past with Mark Linn-Baker (Perfect Strangers) as Adam’s boss. What ‘Adam’ delivers is more than just an intelligent story of boy meets girl, offering a story about Adam’s revelation that he does have the ability to live a “normal” life on his own. Whereas the customary assumption is to assume this is a love story, the truth is that neither Adam nor Beth truly even know what love is as they go through the motions of what a typical relationship entails before learning that love cannot be forced or manufactured and shouldn’t be taken for granted.

I’ve spoken a lot about why I feel this is a significant film, but when all this is put aside, the bottom line is that ‘Adam’ tells a heart-warming and honest story that provides the full spectrum of emotional satisfaction. ‘Adam’ is entertaining and inspirational. Much of the humor is rooted in Adam’s incredible amount of knowledge and his uncanny understanding of the physical world and outer space. Talking in great detail for hours about the intricacies of astrological physics and electronics comes as second nature to Adam, but the ability and understanding of how to carry out a simple and playful 60 seconds of small talk is beyond his ability. Adam begins to grasp this understanding thanks to Beth, while Beth begins to understand what’s really important in her life as a result of her time with Adam.

CineVegas Review: ‘(500) Days of Summer’

How do you remember a past love?  Chances are, it’s not in a linear fashion.  The whole “boy meets girl – boy falls for girl – boy loses girl” storyline works in that order only in typical love stories.  True love is remembered in fits and starts.  Sometimes you remember a fight.  Other times you remember the happier moments.  Still other times you go all the way back to the beginning and remember how the two of you first met.

With ‘(500) Days of Summer,’ writers Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber and director Marc Webb have pieced together one of the most magical and genuine love stories of the modern era.  It moves around within those 500 days that Zooey Deschanel’s Summer is in Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s Tom’s life.  It doesn’t start with them meeting.  We start somewhere in the middle, in one of the more melancholy moments of the relationship.  Slowly, we work back and forth, eventually hitting all the major highs and lows of the relationship finally culminating on the events of that 500th day.

But, the structure is not the only place where ‘(500) Days of Summer’ pulls out the originality.  Were this film told in a completely straight-forward narrative, it still would be head and shoulders above most other romance films.  For one, there is nothing predictable about ‘(500) Days of Summer.’  You truly do not know where it is headed.  You may think you know what is going on, and, honestly, that bit of cinema-going arrogance soured me on the film a little around the middle.  However, by the end, the film reached out, slapped me around and said, “No, I refuse to be just another love story.  You do NOT have any clue where I am headed.”

The acting is unmatched.  Gordon-Levitt is one of the best actors working today, and Deschanel is only a role or two away from taking the same crown on the actress’ side.  These two play their parts with absolute honesty, never once faltering.  Gordon-Levitt’s Tom is a hopeless romantic, always seeking out the next bit of love in his life.  Deschanel’s Summer doesn’t believe in love, and it is unclear for most of the film where she sees her relationship with Tom.

In more amateurish hands, this idea might have gone the way of so many quirky comedies that are fun on first viewing but then simmer out after losing the Best Picture Oscar to something more dramatic.  Yes, I’m talking to you ‘Juno’ and ‘Little Miss Sunshine.’   In even less capable hands, it could have fallen into the saccharine stylings that a majority of romantic comedies stumble over.

However, with ‘(500) Days of Summer,’ you just feel that everything that is transpiring before your eyes is going to stick with you long after you leave the theater.  Every aspect of this film works towards its inevitable state of perfection, not the least of which is Webb’s direction.

This is Webb’s first feature film.  Up until now he has directed a number of music videos and one short film.  He shoots this film as if he has been directing motion pictures for decades.  Every shot in ‘(500) Days of Summer’ is a stunningly beautiful picture.  Every camera movement and edit in the film serves to elicit the emotion coming out of the film’s main character.

Even a few segments within the film where Webb shows us the character’s mindset a bit more stylistically than the rest work perfectly.  There is a dance sequence early on, right after Tom and Summer have spent their first night together.  It is Gordon-Levitt dancing down the street as the whole world seems to take on the blue shade of Deschanel’s eyes.  It is pure movie magic, and it even finds little moments here and there to throw in some hilarious surprises.

Another segment features a split-screen.  The less said about the narrative surrounding this scene the better.  I will just say that certain aspects of what was going on story-wise were lost on me, because I found myself wide-eyed and open-mouthed at how brilliantly crafted the scene was.  That is not to say in the least that what is happening in the story is the slightest bit uninteresting.  Far from it.  The nature of the scene, though, and the way it is so masterfully written and put together is breathtaking.

There is another element to ‘(500) Days of Summer’ that puts the film in a class far above most other films.  The people behind it are not afraid to set their own rules and then break them.  Each scene begins with the numbers 1 – 500 spinning and landing on one, particular number.  It is that day the scene takes place on.  At certain points, though, we don’t get a particular or whole number.  At one point, we get a number and 1/2.  At another point, we get a range of numbers followed by a montage of Tom’s day-to-day routine during that span of time.  This idea of setting your own rules and then having absolutely no fear of breaking them is what makes master craftsmen of filmmakers and the writers and director here take that idea and run with it wholeheartedly.

‘(500) Days of Summer’ is more than just a better-than-average offbeat romantic comedy.  It is a truly amazing and poetic look at the honesty of love and what comes after.  Whether you are someone who has love and lost or someone who has finally found your one, true love, you will know the veracity of the story told in ‘(500) Days of Summer.’  The film is truly amazing, truly the best crafted and most sincere love story put to film in a long time.

June 16, 2009

CineVegas Review: ‘Palermo Shooting’

palermoshooting

There are many living legends of filmmaking in the world today that are still going strong in their craft and Wim Wenders (pronounced Vim Venders) is among that list. While he’s not in the top tier of my most favorite directors, I still appreciate his mastery of the art and craft of making some damn good movies. Many critics will cite that his cinematic body of work has it’s ups and downs, but most directors fall into that category. I’d like to go on the record however, and state that ‘Palermo Shooting’ ranks fairly high on my list of Wenders’ films.

‘Palermo Shooting’ is like many of Wenders’ films — complex, enigmatic and can be a bit taxing to watch at times. The first half of the film plays with a perfect tone and pace that draws the audience into the developing mystery and paints a detailed picture of our main character. In this case, our main character is a very successful fine art photographer named Finn (played by Andreas Frege, also known as the German punk singer Campino) that has taken a liking to fashion photography despite his agent’s warnings that it will destroy his credibility as an artist. Finn does not care, as he finds a strange sort of peace and relaxation within the hyped frenzy of fashion photography.

On the surface it seems Finn has a great life filled with fame, money, nice things and women, but Finn is actually empty on the inside although he doesn’t truly realize this yet. He struggles to hold onto the happiness that seems inherent with the kind of life he leads. Recently experiencing trouble sleeping due to repeated strange and surrealistic dreams, Finn begins to envision a mysterious man in a silver hooded robe, a man who keeps shooting arrows at him in broad daylight, but when Finn attempts to explain to others he finds the arrows have vanished as if existing in an ethereal form and no one claims to have seen a thing.

During a fashion shoot with Milla Jovovich in Greece Italy, Finn decides to remain behind for a bit while his crew return home, wandering the ancient streets of the Greek town and photography the town with a 20-year old favorite camera of his. While exploring and intermittently taking mid day naps in public places around the town, Finn happens to meet Karla (Inga Busch) who restores art for a living. As the two of them slowly grow closer, Finn realizes that she is the only person who believes his stories of the mysterious hooded man (Dennis Hopper) and finds herself uncomfortable by his visions.

After an extremely close call with death from one of the man’s arrows, Finn seeks to search this man out and discover his identity and the reasons for which the man continues to pursue him. What Finn doesn’t realize is that the mysterious man has given him several chances more than is customary and Finn will learn he is asking questions for which the answers he may not be ready to hear. The first half of the film, which carries a level of interest and intrigue that keeps the audience wondering what the outcome will be, slows to a more cautious and cerebral pace in the second half that at times slows to a crawl. Hopper’s small but important role in the film is concentrated in this second half, which leads up to the slightly unexpected ending.

‘Palermo Shooting’ contains many of the trademark elements of Wenders’ films, from a creative and saturated use of popular and eclectic music with a soundtrack including Bonnie Prince Billy, Nick Cave and The Velvet Underground, to the use of super-imposed imagery to convey the feelings of the character and foreshadow events to come. Campino is surprisingly adept in his performance, revealing a depth and range of emotion that we rarely see from musicians that cross over into acting. ‘Palermo Shooting’ is primarily a one man show, whereas Finn actually undergoes an internal battle with himself that is portrayed on film as an external struggle, manifesting in what seem to be outwardly physical obstacles. Ultimately, Finn is allowed to learn a valuable lesson about life and death and all that exists between the two, changing his outlook on the life he once though complete.

Some may feel the need to call Wenders a pretentious old hack, but I find this accusation unwarranted and just plain mean-spirited. I agree that many of his films present ideas that are heavy and at times hard to swallow, but let’s not fault a filmmaker for taking chances and venturing into a realm of storytelling that is challenging and difficult. I find that, even if his films aren’t always a success, they’re almost always interesting and worth the credit of having tread across a path so many others have feared to tread. ‘Palermo Shooting’ is not for everyone’s tastes and will likely either lose many viewers or simply bore them, but the film remains a moderately successful entry into the archive of Wim Wenders that has plenty of creative juice to keep the curious and open-minded viewer’s batteries charged.

CineVegas Review: ‘The Revenant’

therevenantmovie

Friendship and strange relationships seems to have been one of the major themes represented at CineVegas 2009.   We had not one, but two love stories told out of sinc (‘500 Days of Summer’ and ‘Mercy).   We had two, straight friends who decide to make a porno for artistic value in ‘Humpday.’   We even had an intergalactic relationship between a rugged outlaw and a little girl with ‘Stingray Sam.’   However, nothing seen all week at CineVegas would prepare us for the strangeness found in the horror comedy film, ‘The Revenant.’

Joey (Chris Wylde) is a slacker, a real low-life who would rather sell drugs than go out and find a real job.   He has just buried his best friend and roommate, Bart (David Anders), a soldier who has died in Iraq.   Joey is about to go on with his life when Bart, resurrected from the grave, comes knocking on his door.

Bart has become, for no reason given, a revenant, a member of the undead who must satisfy his cravings for human blood by night.   He dies again each dawn, only to be brought right back once the sun goes down.   So, what do you do with a friend who is completely immortal and is only able to go out at night?   You party your heads off, right?

The narrative for ‘The Revenant’ doesn’t just stop at the level of two friends dealing with newfound immortality in one of them.   It delves into violence, gets more complex, and, by the end of the film, completely goes way out on the limb.   Joey and Bart become a duo of vigilantes, taking out murderers and drug dealers allowing Bart to suck them dry of their blood.   If ‘The Revenant’ would have stuck with this storyline and allowed the majority of the film to follow this path, it would have worked successfuly in several different ways.   However, writer/director Kerry Prior only gives the two a small amount of screen time to work any violent magic on the criminal underworld.   Much of the film’s earlier scenes is played out for absolute comic relief with the hanging out, getting drunk, and, basically, being the adolescent partiers Joey has always wanted them to be.

These early moments could have easily been cut out.   If nothing else, they could have been shortened immensely.   It seems like most of the scenes found in ‘The Revenant’ are about twice as long as they need to be.   It is well into the film before the real plotline begins to reveal itself.   Don’t get me wrong.   There is a lot of fun to be had in the first half of ‘The Revenant.’   Anders and Wylde are clearly having a blast playing these two characters, and it seems much of their early scenes together were improvised while the two were just hanging out.   Anders just happens to have crazy, zombie makeup covering his face and Kerry Prior just happens to be there with a camera to film it all.

The first half of ‘The Revenant’ offers up some bloody good fun, as well.   Prior’s interest in directing the film more towards horror is evident.   He never holds back from showing us the red stuff.   Unfortunately, the story behind all the fun horror just isn’t as interesting as it should have or even could have been.

One thing, however, that is interesting about the film’s plot is the notion that Prior never gives us a reason for Bart’s resurrection.   Late scenes give an indication that this is a small part of something bigger, but there still is no explanation given.   It’s not needed, and it would have just slowed down the film more than it already was.

Needless to say, at some point, Joey becomes a member of the undead, as well, and this is where the film begins to take more of a dramatic turn.   It is a very interesting study to have two friends become members of the undead, conscious as they are, and show that they have two, opposing views on what they should do with the power.   Bart feels the two are doing good in the world, taking out bad guys and feeding his own thirst for human blood at the same time.   Joey just wants to run off to Vegas where day and night are pretty much flipped anyway.   I say this is a very interesting study, but Prior doesn’t allow this much screen time, either.   And this is saying something considering the film’s running time of just under two hours.

One element that is given just enough amount of screen time is the relationship between Bart and his girlfriend, Janet, played by Louise Griffiths.   Prior hits on it a few times here and there, but, for the most part, it just lingers in the background.   One scene between Bart and Janet actually delves into the realm of high emotion.   It doesn’t hurt that Prior has some nicely placed Muse playing in the background.

‘The Revenant’ feels like a statue that is half chiseled.   You know there is a masterpiece under there somewhere, but the artist involved still has a lot of work to do on it.   The film feels like it was rushed through production extremely fast.   This is a definite possibility.   They could have rushed through production just to get a workable print to show at CineVegas.   Special effects are not polished at all.   The editor involved needs to go back and work through the flow of the film again.   There are several scenes late in the film that make absolutely no sense, and they don’t offer anything to the overall story, either.   At a certain point late in the film, Bart begins attempting suicide.   It might have been effective earlier in the film, but, after seeing him getting shotgun-blasted by drug dealers more than a few times, it doesn’t really mean anything to see him trying and failing to hang himself.

There are about half a dozen points where ‘The Revenant’ could have ended.   It probably should have picked one of these moments.   As more and more false endings come our way, our interest in what happens to Bart and Joey grows less and less.   By the end of the film, the storyline gets so convoluted that the whale-sized plot holes found in the film’s ending aren’t even of note.   You just don’t care by then.

‘The Revenant’ is a film that could have been a lot of fun.   Everyone involved seems to have been having a grand time shooting it, and this level of comraderie really does comes through for most of the film.   Unfortunately, what could have been a fast-paced and highly entertaining horror comedy gets lost in the middle of a film that still needs a whole lot of post-production work.   If the film gets picked up for distribution, I’m sure these problems will get fixed.   Plain and simple, ‘The Revenant’ seen at CineVegas was an unfinished version of a much better film.   There is just one more piece of evidence that the film wasn’t complete.   The final credit in the opening credits reads: PRODUCED, WRITTEN, AND DIRECTOR BY KERRY PRIOR.   That just about says it all.

CineVegas Review: ‘Bronson’

bronsonmovie

“In the future everyone will be famous for fifteen minutes.” — Andy Warhol

By now, everyone should be familiar with this quote made famous by the pop artist Andy Warhol and most all of us can probably relate to it’s meaning in one way or another. The variable in this prediction is for what shall each person be famous. When Warhol uttered these words, his meaning was most likely related to the rapidly increasing popularity and accessibility to new media such as television, making it possible for anyone to get face time in front of hundreds, thousands or even millions of people.

‘Bronson’ is based on a true story about Michael Peterson, later known for his self-adopted unofficial fighting name Charlie Bronson. Mickey, as those closest to him call him, is a man who knows he is destined for greatness of some kind and he’s known since he was a child. What exactly that greatness is, however, is precisely the obstacle that Mickey struggles to overcome as a young man living in England in the 1970s. That is, of course, until he realized he had the heart and drive (and perhaps even the marbles) to be a fighter.

Mickey should not be mistaken for a professional fighter. During a particularly rough period in his adult youth, Mickey attempted to convince his intimate companion to marry him with a massive stolen diamond ring, only to find himself put down by his girl and put away by the law for having stolen the ring. This new chapter in Mickey’s life turns out to be a revelation for him as he quickly discovers that serving 4-7 years in prison is a long time and gives him lots of time to pursue his dream of greatness.

Once inside, Mickey decides he likes prison and refers to his cell as his hotel room. Mickey determines his time behind bars is his time to shine, creating for himself the fame and reputation as Britain’s most violent criminal. This endeavor plays out perfectly as he is privileged with a captive audience that is highly receptive to the type of performance that Mickey has set out to provide. In a way only Mickey could truly appreciate, his world has come together and allowed him the destiny he’s sought since childhood.

The strapping young Mickey Peterson is given a fascinating performance by Tom Hardy (RocknRolla) that is equally humorous, disturbing and insightful. Director Nicholas Winding Refn manages to construct an intensely textural sensory interpretation of the man known as Charlie Bronson, based on Brock Norman Brock’s writing. The film delves into both the reality and the fantasy of the man and the world he created in his mind that spilled into the real world with pint after pint of blood and pain.

Later in Mickey’s blood-soaked circus of chaos and carnage, he finds himself losing the control and power of manipulation he has come to adore as the penal system of England loses patience and ideas for how best to contain and control the beast known as Bronson. After repeated attempts to break his will through relocation and time spent in solitary confinement, Mickey is transfered to an asylum for the criminally insane, abruptly removing him from his element and nearly destroys his strong will.

‘Bronson’ is a film clearly influenced by the late Stanley Kubrick’s infamous cinematic ode to violence and the society that creates it, and in that same way is what ‘Bronson’ attempts to convey in the extensively violent telling of Mickey Peterson. The movie is an amazing audio-visual experience that has been meticulously pieced together from Refn’s precise cinematic blueprints. This may all sound very familiar to those serious film buffs that appreciate Kubrick’s work, but Refn manages to make this film his own despite the influence.

Once again comparing ‘Bronson’ to ‘A Clockwork Orange’, powerful classical music plays a significant role in the telling of Peterson’s story and the illustration of his mind and his personality. Peterson is not an unintelligent man, but merely focuses his energy on achieving the goal at hand. Time after time, Peterson insists on being a violent presence, provoking the guards at every chance, consequently resulting in his unimaginable amount of time spent in solitary confinement. Peterson has spent 34 years in prison without having ever killed a single person, 30 of those years were spent in solitary confinement.

In a very strange way, ‘Bronson’ depicts the notion of hope and the power of staying true to one’s dreams, even if they are incredibly self-destructive and detrimental to society. ‘Bronson’ is a movie that takes the yin and the yang of life and sticks it in a giant blender, creating a puree that blurs what is good and bad, right and wrong, leaving only the ultra-violent vaudevillian version of the world that exists through Peterson’s crimson-colored glasses.

The movie as a whole is not quite perfect, but it does manage to come quite close. The only truly obvious flaw in ‘Bronson’ is it’s relative lack of a traditional three-act story. The plot is there and is easy enough to follow, but more time is spent on developing the idea of Charlie Bronson than is spent on developing the character himself and his underlying motivations. Aside from this one area of concern, ‘Bronson’ is a breath-taking piece of cinema. Breath-taking not in it’s beauty, although Larry Smith’s cinematography is outstanding, but more like a gut punch that takes your breath away, leaving you utterly flabbergasted that what just occurred actually did occur in some version of real life.

CineVegas Review: ‘Humpday’

Filed under: Cinevegas 2009,Review — Tags: , , , , , — Travis Keune @ 1:15 am

humpdaymovie

What would you do to prove the strength of your friendship with someone? How far would you go? OK, now what is the most extreme thing you would do with a friend of the same sex to show how much they mean to you? Sure, ‘Humpday’ is a comedy, but the film is just as much a playful story of two guys who are the best of friends, who made a promise to each other and find that keeping that promise may prove more difficult than they had imagined.

Director Lynn Shelton, who also plays the role of the bi-sexual artsy friend Monica, has created another entry into the fresh new genre of dramedy known by those in the know as “mumblecore” and it is a delightful success. The film stars Mark Duplas (The Puffy Chair) and Josh Leonard (The Blair Witch Project) as two old college buddies who are suddenly reunited when Andrew (Leonard) shows up unannounced at 2am for a visit with Ben (Duplas) at his home in the suburbs.

Having traveled the world and experienced all kinds of things, Andrew has become the open-minded art-loving free-spirited type, while Ben has gotten married with a good job and a nice house in the burbs. Surprised, but happy to see Andrew, Ben and his reluctantly understanding wife Anna (Alycia Delmore) welcome Andrew into their home as the two friends quickly begin catching up on old times and reminiscing about the past.

The following night, Andrew invites Ben and Alycia over to Monica’s place for an all-out Dionysus party. Ben agrees to stop by to put in some face time, despite Anna’s prior plans to make them dinner and get to know Andrew better. What ensues is an orgy of alcohol and marijuana that leads Ben to stay for hours while Anna waits for him to return home. The catalyst for both the comedy and drama of ‘Humpday’ occurs with an idea that Ben comes up with after they learn from Monica about an erotic video art fest called HumpFest.

Uninhibited and high as a kite on the hookah, Ben suggests that the only way this would be worthwhile would be to come up with an idea that has never been done, otherwise it’s just more typical porn. His idea is for him and Andrew to have sex with each other on film as two straight guys depicting the depth of their friendship. What seems to be a brilliant and artistically worthy concept turns into a dilemma for the two friends the next morning as they realize the implications of what they have set in motion.

Ben must now attempt to convey and gain Anna’s approval and acceptance of this bizarre project, but the overwhelmingly difficult task at hand is for Ben and Andrew to overcome the strain the next 24 hours will put on their friendship. Initially touched upon as a mistake, Ben abruptly reinterprets their agreement as both a crucial symbol of their friendship and as a way to prove his marriage and current life has not completely destroyed the more adventurous and open-minded side of himself that he sees in Andrew.

On the flip side, Andrew appears to be more conflicted with the proposition than Ben as he begins to question his own true self and whether the person he is being is completely false to the person he actually is. Neither of the two friends will back down, fearing that if they do it will tarnish the trust they have with each other and damage their friendship. In the face of pride, Ben and Andrew put aside any beneficial sense of humility and agree to uphold their promise to follow through with this project.

From here, ‘Humpday’ truly makes it’s mark as the real impact of the story takes place during Ben and Andrew’s time together in the hotel room rented with the purpose of filming themselves having sex for the sake of art. Perhaps one of the most uncomfortable situations two straight men could possibly put themselves into, the second half of ‘Humpday’ becomes a hilarious but thoughtful meditation on where to draw the line between platonic love and sexual love.

Ben and Andrew must first determine whether or not to even act on this agreement and if so, how to go about making it work, not just for themselves but also as a worthwhile work of art. The film is shot handheld with an understated production value to create the sense of realism and feeling that we’re witnessing these two friends experience this awkward scenario in real time, as it happens. The emotions of the story are just as effective as the humor and even the mystery of whether or not these two friends will actually carry out this project plays a prominent role in the overall success of the movie.

‘Humpday’ is an extremely satisfying movie that will make the audience laugh, think and maybe even choke up a bit in spots. Shelton manages to convey the controversial aspect of the story without relying on a shock value approach that would offend many viewers, but also manages to highlight the touching and poignant side of the story as well with the help of great performances from Duplas and Leonard that are grounded in reality, despite being greatly improvised. Alycia Delmore also delivers an outstanding performance, who portrays the extremely complex and unbearable emotions of what Anna must endure at the mercy of Ben and Andrew with exacting and powerful clarity.

I highly recommend seeing ‘Humpday’ for the important work of cinematic art that it is, not just the comedy that it offers on the surface. Realizing the subject matter will likely, and undeservedly, turn some people off, I ask that any reservations regarding the content be put aside and assure the only reasonable offense to be taken from ‘Humpday’ would require a distaste for meaningful storytelling about the true nature of friendship.

June 15, 2009

CineVegas Review: ‘Stingray Sam’

Filed under: Cinevegas 2009,Review — Tags: , , , — Kirk @ 11:16 pm

stingray sam

Stingray Sam is not a hero.   He just does things that folks don’t do that need to be done.   Cory McAbee’s latest cinematic offering is a sci-fi/western/musical/comedy.   Got that?   It offers up something for just about everyone, and McAbee’s incredibly engaging story, not to mention the beautiful black and white photography, makes it just about the most fun you’ll have in the independent theater this year.

Playing out in six segments, ‘Stingray Sam’ tells the story of…well…Stingray Sam (McAbee), a one-time outlaw who is just trying to make it as a lounge singer/endorser for Liberty Chew Chewing Tobacco.   Enter the Quasar Kid (Crugie…that’s the guy’s name.   Crugie), Stingray’s former accomplice who has an offer for Stingray.   He must accompany Quasar to help retrieve a kidnapped, little girl, and all of Stingray and Quasar’s past offenses will be forgiven.   The adventure begins.

The film plays out like six, consecutive episodes of a sci-fi serialized TV show.   Each episode has the same intro theme, along with the same opening credits and the cast members who appear in that episode.   Each episode has a title card.   Each episode has wonderful narration strewn throughout by the incomparably stellar voice of David Hyde Pierce.   Each episode even has a single song played somewhere within it by McAbee’s band, American Astronaut.   On top of all of this, each episode grows in its brilliance.

The first few episodes are hilarious, and they get funnier as we go along.   Stingray and Quasar run into brilliantly crafted, eccentric characters.   Whether its a secretary who calls out numbers in completely random order or a planet full of pregnent men or the first bred clone who is treated like royalty, the characters in ‘Stingray Sam’ are incredible and, equally as much, hilarious.   McAbee and Crugie also bring the funny in ample amounts.   However, the funniest aspects of these earlier episodes are the songs.   The soundtrack for ‘Stingray Sam’ is a must-listen, and most of the songs are sure to play out just as comically the fiftieth time as they do the first.   The song “Fredward” is a real standout, and features a seemingly endless barrage of names.   It makes sense when you see it, and I don’t want to give away too much about the intricacies of this particular song.   Let’s just say, you’ll know what I’m talking about halfway through listening to the song.

McAbee also incorporates some magnificent collages into each episode, each one going over some important backstory to the overall narrative.   They are as intricately written as they are executed.   John Borruso deserves much credit for his work on the animated collages found in ‘Stingray Sam.’

Credit must also go to Scott Miller.   His camera work and usage of stark black and white is nothing short of breathtaking.   It honestly gets some getting used to be following such a goofy storyline through the lense of such profesional looking colors.

As the story progresses, the film actually takes a more dramatic turn.   Once Stingray and Quasar rescure the kidnapped girl, played sweetly by McAbee’s daughter, Willa Vy McAbee, the chuckles subside and the emotional outlook begins to take over.   It’s not even a sudden jolt in the film’s overall narrative.   McAbee does a great job of seemlessly moving the tone from one to the other.   A later moment of the film where Stingray and Quasar sing a lullaby to the girl is just about the most genuinely sweet scene seen in years.

And that is what makes ‘Stingray Sam’ such a success.   For all of its facets, all of the different feels to the film, McAbee and crew don’t let any of them feel short-changed.   The sci-fi, the western, the comedy, the musical, and the dramatic aspects of the film are all executed with equal care.   They all blend together perfectly well, as well, each flowing through or alongside the other to create the perfect mixture of them all.

‘Stingray Sam’ is the type of film that moviegoers looking for something a little bit different will absolutely adore.   Original in all of its aspects, and genuine in all of its execution, it is the best sci-fi/western/comedy/musica/serialized story ever told.   That might not be saying much, but don’t let that fool you.   ‘Stingray Sam’ is absolute fun.   Now, if I can just get those darn songs out of my head.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress