MAKE-OUT WITH VIOLENCE Screening in Los Angeles

makeout_violence2

Back in March of 2009 I reviewed a little indie horror film playing at SXSW called MAKE-OUT WITH VIOLENCE. What resulted for me was an instant crush for this awesome zombie flick/love story. I felt this movie, made out of Nashville, Tennessee was one of the most original zombie flicks I’d seen in years and needed to get a chance. Well, for those in the Los Angeles area, this is it!

Please, if you’re in the area and you can make it out, take the time to give this film a chance. Below is a direct invitation from the Deagol Brothers, directors of MAKE-OUT WITH VIOLENCE…

WHAT: MAKE-OUT with VIOLENCE, produced and directed by Nashville filmmakers the Deagol Brothers, is making its Los Angeles Premiere as winner of the Regal Cinemas Dreammaker Award.

WHEN/WHERE: MAKE-OUT with VIOLENCE will be screening at-

Regal (Edwards) Atlantic Palace on Thursday November 12th @ 7pm

Regal (Edwards) Atlantic Palace 10
W. Main Street
Alhambra, CA 91801
event phone (626) 458 9748

Although Alhambra might be out of the way for some of you, Admission is FREE and this is a ONE-NIGHT-ONLY screening of the film.

WHY: Official Selection of numerous festivals including the 2009 SXSW FF and Winner of both the Atlanta and Nashville Film Festival’s Best Picture Awards our debut feature is part eerie love story, part coming-of-age drama and part zombie flick. With its stylized vision and custom-made soundtrack, MAKE-OUT with VIOLENCE recalls the early work of Wes Anderson and Sofia Coppola.

Please visit the website: www.makeoutwithviolence.com
or feel free to contact us for additional information about the film: limerentpictures@gmail.com

Best Regards,
the deagol brothers
MAKE-OUT with VIOLENCE

Happy Birthday, Dolph Lundgren!

dolph

As I am sure Scott (aka, Dolph Fanboy #1) is still sound asleep (slacker) I will personally offer this announcement on behalf of all the movie geeks…

1957 – A little boy was born 52 years ago on this day in Stockholm, Sweden named Dolph Lundgren. This little boy would grow up to become the muscle icon and action star we know today. Dolph has appeared in 39 films, including some currently in production, and has won our applause as He-Man, Capt. Ivan Drago in ROCKY IV and memorable roles in THE PUNISHER, SHOWDOWN IN LITTLE TOKYO, UNIVERSAL SOLDIER, JOHNNY MNEMONIC and a slew of other hard-hitting action films in which he was the star. Happy Birthday to you, Mr. Lundgren, and may you continue to grace our direct-toDVD shelves for years to come!

Zemeckis Confirms ROGER RABBIT Sequel in the Works

rogerrabbithoskins

While director Robert Zemeckis has already spoken fondly of the idea of doing a sequel to WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT? in the past, MTV has now confirmed from the man himself that the script for a sequel has been commissioned, and it’s being written by Jeffrey Price and Peter Seaman, who were the original writers of the now two-decade old half-animated classic. Details are being withheld, for the time being, about which characters are returning, what the story will be and how exactly Zemeckis plans to use the new digital tools in his arsenal for blending the real world with the cartoon world.

Source: MTV

Review: EARTH DAYS

earthdaysdoc

Here we are, the day after Halloween. The day of the dead, All Hallow’s Eve, has come and past for another year and we now fully embrace the autumn season, the season of temporary death. This is the season of life going dormant, but it does so with the intent of reviving itself even stronger and more fertile in the months of spring. So, for me it seems a fitting time for a new documentary about the state of our environment.

So, I can almost hear the many voices asking why we need another documentary on this subject, one that has been nearly beaten into the ground as of late. But, has it really run it’s course? Have we really seen any impact in practice from the previous slew of documentaries on the topic? Personally, I believe we’ve only begun to even consider the truth of the relationship between us, human beings, and the environment in which we live… and do so with the permission of mother nature. We are not guaranteed residence on this planet. Birth does not inherently equate a right to survive. Nature is, and always has been, survival of the fittest and we are not exempt from that rule.

EARTH DAYS is this new documentary from filmmaker Robert Stone (AMERICAN BABYLON) which attempts to tackle the subject through human eyes, drawing from the human experience. Unlike so many other documentaries of this nature, EARTH DAYS approaches the topic in a way that I greatly appreciate as closer to my own beliefs. To great extent, the film avoids preaching how we, human kind, have been killing the planet and how if we don’t change our ways we will succeed. Instead, and much to my agreeable surprise, the film actually puts our own past before our eyes, focuses on how our actions have affected us rather than how it has and will allegedly affect the Earth.

The film doesn’t focus on questionable predictions. EARTH DAYS deals mainly with what we know we’ve done in the past. The film is narrated with interviews from various experts from different backgrounds, all of whom have lived long enough to actually experience the events of which they speak, giving them added credibility. While I personally did not agree with every last opinion offered by these experts, such as one former congressman’s claim that the interstate highway was a bad idea, I did find the overall film to be a valuable and fresh change of tactics for educating the general public about a serious problem.

About this problem… I will go ahead and let you know that this review will, and perhaps already has, contain far more of my own opinions on the film’s subject matter that is normal, but I feel it adds to my ability to convey how this film has affected me, which is really all I can offer to give the reader in the first place. I am a supporter of conservation, environmental responsibility and the value of the phrase “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle”.

While some of the interviewees do touch on the impact our actions have had on the health of the planet, I feel the film equally addresses, indirectly, the fact that through our own actions, we endanger ourselves just as much, if not more so, than we endanger the planet. It is my belief that nature is resilient. We, like all life, are welcome within the natural machine so long as we are not disruptive to that machine. Without a recognition of our impact and willingness to adjust, we pose a far greater threat to encouraging our own extinction as a species than we pose upon the planet and nature itself, which has and always will find a way to survive, short of the planet exploding outright.

EARTH DAYS delivers it’s message in a fashion that remains open to individual interpretation. The structure of the film resembles greatly that of an Errol Morris documentary, such as FAST, CHEAP AND OUT OF CONTROL, interlacing candid and heart-felt interviews with people speaking from their own personal experience with archival footage and beautiful nature cinematography. Many of the archival clips allow us to look back at an otherwise innocent time of environmental ignorance and laugh uncomfortably at that ignorance, but should also remind us that some of these images still exist today.

This is a mellow, hypnotically calm and peaceful film that deals with a topic that is anything but, giving the cause a less confrontational image which I believe is needed. To continue approaching this issue in a way that blames the human race for killing the Earth has not, and will not work, whereas hitting the people’s defenses where they are weakest, by pointing out that we are merely hurting ourselves by not respecting the planet and nature itself, it delivers the message with far greater resonance, tapping into the natural survival instinct.

EARTH DAYS is one of the first films that really succeeds on some level at doing this. The problem, among many, with Al Gore’s AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH, is that the film was not emotionally accessible to the average American. To be quite frank, AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH was boring and felt more like a college lecture than a film. People as a whole do not respond to facts and figures, but they do respond the personal experience, especially from other people they feel they can relate to and this is what EARTH DAYS succeeds at offering the general viewing public.

Dennis Hopper Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer

dennis_hopper

Actor, writer, director and artist Dennis Hopper has been diagnosed with prostate cancer. On October 1st, we reported that Mr. Hopper was admitted into a Manhattan hospital for severe flu-like symptoms and dehydration.

Mr. Hopper has chosen to undergo a “special programme” in California and has canceled all upcoming appearances so that he can focus on treatment. We certainly wish Mr. Hopper a full and speedy recovery and offer our thoughts and prayers during this difficult chapter in his life.

Source: BBC News

Coen Bros’ TRUE GRIT Draws Big Names

damon_brolin

Anyone who knows me personally knows that I’m an insatiable uber-fan of the Coen Brothers. They are to my movie world what Quentin Tarantino is to Scott’s. In my eyes, the Coen Brothers can do know wrong and I’m always as eager as a kid on Christmas morning whenever their new film emerges… which is getting to be about as regular as Woody Allen. Naturally, anytime news surfaces on a Coen Brothers production, I’m all over it like stink on… well, you get the picture.

With Jeff Bridges, who last worked with Joel and Ehtan Coen on THE BIG LEBOWSKI, on board to play U.S. Marshall Rooster Cogburn, previously portrayed by John Wayne, two more major stars have entered discussions to become part of the Coen Brothers world. Josh Brolin, who has worked with the Brothers Coen on NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, is in talks to return to the team as The Killer.

Matt Damon is also in talks to play The Lawman who works alongside Cogburn. Damon, being the Coen Brothers rookie, should choose wisely (meaning, choose YES) if offered a role, as the Coen Brothers are developing the same appeal as being offered a role in a Woody Allen movie… you simply do NOT turn it down! Damon has increasingly become a popular candidate for edgy or high profile filmmakers, last appearing in Steven Soderbergh’s THE INFORMANT, although that relationship is anything but “new” anymore. His next film due out in theaters is Clint Eastwood’s INVICTUS.

Source: Variety

Keira Knightley is MY FAIR LADY

hepburn_knightley

A while back, we posted a Fantasy Cast discussion piece regarding who should be cast in the role of Eliza Doolittle in the remake of MY FAIR LADY. Yeah, this was was more or less for the ladies, but news just hit that the decision has been made and the role goes to Keira Knightley, who apparently won out over her main competition being Scarlett Johansson. Scar-Jo is great, but with all due respect, would not have been right for the role. While I’m not the biggest fan on Knightley, she certainly does have the look and sensibility, but she’ll have a hard time coming anywhere near to being as right for the role as Audrey Hepburn was… a nearly impossible feat to achieve.

Knightley apparently had to fight for the role, but ultimately fit the bill. She’d already begun taking singing lessons last year around the time she auditioned. The script is being written by Emma Thompson and word is that Daniel Craig is being considered as a possible candidate for playing Professor Henry Higgins… yeah, that was my reaction as well. Nothing against Craig. He’s great in what he does, but not what I pictured for this role.

Source: Telegraph.Co.Uk

Dylan Baker confirmed for SPIDER-MAN 4

thelizard_sm4

This little bit of news delivered courtesy of Movieblog.UGO.com, actor Dylan Baker participated in a Q&A following a special screening of TRICK ‘R TREAT at New York’s Walter Reade Theater for Lincoln Center’s third annual “Scary Movies” program and during this occasion revealed that he will reprise his role as Dr. Connors in Sam Raimi’s fourth installment in the SPIDER-MAN franchise.

So, why is this news of any significance? Well, there is the possibility that it’s not all that significant, but what it does is raise the question of whether or not a character by the name of The Lizard will be featured as the and/or one of the villains in the new Spidey film. Oh yeah, and if none of this is making any sense, then you must not be much of a comic book fan and are probably better off just skipping to the next post on the site.

Now, as eluded to in the Q&A as reported by Jordan Hoffman at Movieblog.UGO.com, there was some playful winking and nodding when asked to elaborate on the topic of whether or not The Lizard would be involved, or if Dr. Connors would merely have another minor background role. Technically, the answer was no, but we all know how that goes.

Personally, I love the idea of bringing The Lizard into the mix. It’s an older throwback than Venom, of which the franchise nearly suffered and untimely end. The Lizard holds some of that old school super villain charm that tends to get lost in the movie adaptations. In my book, the best part of SPIDER-MAN 3 was The Sandman. He’s an old school villain, had a great story and was given an awesome performance by Thomas Haden Church.

This has been the trend (SPIDEY 3’s Venom excluded) whereas the villains have been the cherry on the top of the ice cream sundae, assisted heavily by fantastic performances by stellar actors… Willem Dafoe as Green Goblin, Alfred Molina as Doctor Octopus. Am I asking too much that we return to that trend? Hopefully, with Raimi’s alleged free reign given him by Sony for #4, we’ll see a new light for the franchise.

Source: UGO

Review: ASTRO BOY

astroboymovie

ASTRO BOY is the moderately anticipated new CGI-animated adventure hitting theaters, based on the 1952 Japanese manga series created by Osama Tezuka, which was followed by a television series beginning in 1963. This new film was helmed by David Bowers, which is his second directorial outing after FLUSHED AWAY in 2006.

The film tells the story of a brilliant young boy, the prodigal son of scientist Dr. Tenma (Nicolas Cage) who is developing a powerful new infinitely renewable source of clean energy recovered from a fallen comet. Naturally, his groundbreaking research is funded by the military and now they want to integrate this new power into powerful weapons.

In a tragic accident, Dr. Tenma’s son is killed, leading him to use this incredible power to recreate his son as the ultimate robot, equipped with endless defensive abilities to keep him safe. The robot has his son’s memory, but not the realization of his true self until he discovers his powers and becomes Astro Boy (Freddy Highmore). Now, as Uncle Ben would say… “with great power comes great responsibility”… Astro Boy uses his powers to save the futuristic, floating Metro City from an ego-maniacal President driven to get re-elected at any cost.

ASTRO BOY is a fun little movie, but it’s primarily targeted at younger audiences… much younger. Even kids around the age of ten may find the film a bit young for them, but for kids in general it’s rather enjoyable. The story is decent, has some good messages to it and holds together fairly well. The dialogue and the humor is where much of the youthful intention emerges.

The voice cast features a respectable line-up, including Kristen Bell, Bill Nighy, Donald Sutherland, Eugene Levy, Nathan Lane and even Samuel L. Jackson. Nicolas Cage does a decent job, but I did find myself pulled out of the story whenever he spoke, unlike the rest of the cast. He just has one of those unavoidably recognizable voices. Sam Jackson, on the other hand, managed to slip past my recognition until the end credits.

Visually, ASTRO BOY looks great! The animation is sharp and stylishly simplified. The colors pop and the action is high-speed and energetic. The movie is going to appeal to boys for sure, filled with rocket boot flight on several occasions, arm cannons and all sorts of other miscellaneous weapons produced both by Astro Boy and his enemies. Girls may also enjoy the relative cuteness of the film and Astro Boy’s human friends he develops along the way.

The ending felt a bit tacked on and forced… OK, it IS tacked on and forced, clearly meant to setup the potential sequel. Kids will likely enjoy the movie. How much so will likely be a direct result of how young they are. Adults likely won’t be blown away, but if you find yourselves chaperoning young ones to this film, fear not. Boredom is unlikely.

We asked some of ASTRO BOY’s target audience what they though of the film:

astroboys

Teddy: Great for 7 years old and older… best scenes were the action ones.

Ben: Great family film. Five star funny. I loved the flying scene and technology. I would tell my friends to go see it.

Jake (Tech Guy): I thought it was very hi-tech with touch screen computers. I really loved the movie.

Sean: I liked all the flying. Funniest part was when Toby/Astro Boy realizes that “I have machines guns? In my butt?”

Review: A SERIOUS MAN

aseriousmanmovie

No matter how normal, no matter how pleasant or safe our lives feel at any given moment — the sobering truth of it all remains that anything can happen at any time, for any reason and without even the slightest hint of logic or reasoning. This fact of life could hardly be more present within the Coen Brothers new film A SERIOUS MAN.

The film opens with a quote. Pay attention, as it serves it’s purpose in the enigmatic story of a man trying to make sense of his life, past, present and future. No, this isn’t a retelling of A CHRISTMAS CAROL… that comes later this year and is animated. In fact, it’s been suggested that the film is actually a modern retelling of the Book of Job. Regardless, A SERIOUS MAN is a story about how the universe works and how it doesn’t always work in our favor. Call it chance, fate, whatever… the point is, none of us have any control over anything.

The opening scene takes us into an era past, serving more as an allegory for the film to come, but also sets up the tone of A SERIOUS MAN and gets our minds headed down the right path, even if we have no idea what the path is… even after the film ends. The story itself takes place in 1967 and follows a series of events in the life of Larry Gopnik (Michael Stuhlbarg), an average, mild-mannered Jewish family man and physics professor. Larry is a relatively quiet and decent man, but when his life begins to fall apart around him, one jaw-dropping piece at a time, he finds himself questioning everything.

Larry’s wife Judith (Sari Lennick) drops the first bombshell on his fragile existence, introducing the suave yet unlikable character Sy Ableman (Fred Melamed) and starting the chain reaction of mostly unrelated occurrences that will nearly send Larry over the edge. Interwoven into Larry’s story is his son Danny’s (Aaron Wolff) story, which runs it’s own course until the end when his story comes full circle, acting as the catalyst for an altogether brilliant ending in true Coen Brothers style.

Speaking of the ending, the [fill in the blank] which appears in the final scene actually serves as a sort of metaphor, representing one potential answer to Larry’s primary question. You know, the question all of mankind has been asking for countless generations, the one that civilizations across the globe have repeatedly attempted to answer. On a side note, the film is already garnering the usual praise for the Coen Brothers as masters of their craft, but is also raising hackles amidst some who feel the film mocks the Jewish faith. To those whom find this film offensive, and with no assumptions as to any real understanding of such feelings, I simply ask with all due respect… Why so serious?

Stuhlbarg (BODY OF LIES) is very good in A SERIOUS MAN. The film is deeply rooted within the Jewish faith and culture, but really is not exclusive to this setting. This is a story that could happen to anyone. That’s not to say there isn’t plenty to learn about the Jewish experience from this film, but try not to allow this element to get in the way. Joel and Ethan Coen have clearly implemented the cardinal rule of writing… to write what you know.

The dialogue utilizes a frequent use of the Hebrew language, but in small does sprinkled throughout the film. I found this element extremely well-placed, adding a certain cultural spice and intrigue. The film makes no effort to explain these terms, but they are integrated in a way that allows the audience to put two and two together and not get lost or confused. I appreciate this common thread by the Coen Brothers’ to challenge audiences with their films, but not in a pretentious way.

Perhaps one of the most surprising and enjoyable parts of A SERIOUS MAN is the performance given by Richard Kind (THE GRAND, THE VISITOR) as Larry brother, affectionately referred to as Uncle Arthur. He lives with Larry and his family, has an awkwardly inconvenient medical condition and serves as one of various unlikely sources of insight for Larry in his painfully relentless search for answers.

Richard Kind delivers a performance with range and realism. As an audience, we find ourselves feeling sorry for him, being annoyed by him and yet also find him oddly likable. While I certainly feel Richard Kind is deserving a spot amidst the Oscar nominations for Best Supporting Actor, he unfortunately is overshadowed by Christoph Waltz’s performance in INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS.

Despite the initial impression going in of a story that sounds potentially slow, drab or boring, A SERIOUS MAN is anything but, as true Coen Brothers fans will attest. This film has plenty of energy, an even mixture of serious comedy and comically dramatic moments, with a tiny pinch of the darker side of things for flavor. And, for those serious Coen Brothers fans, A SERIOUS MAN also features a few staples for our enjoyment.

Carter Burwell (FARGO, ADAPTATION) makes this the 13th film he’s scored for the Coen Brothers and does so with great success. Roger Deakins (THE SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION, KUNDUN) also returns as the impeccable cinematographer he is, making this his 10th time behind the camera for the Coen Brothers. Just for fun, listen closely to catch the reference to the Coen Brothers’ last film BURN AFTER READING.

Overall, A SERIOUS MAN is a funny but honest film that makes us think. It’s an enigmatic ride, but one that’s eerily familiar, if not exaggerated a bit for our own viewing pleasure. The film begins and ends strongly, and maintains it’s strength throughout. The ending, in particular, hits like a ton of slightly enlightened bittersweet bricks. On the scale of audience accessibility, A SERIOUS MAN falls somewhere between NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN and O BROTHER WHERE ART THOU, but I highly recommend any who finds this fearful to overcome that fear.