LAND OF MINE – Review

landofmine

In the realm of “docudramas”, the one war that seems to be a bottomless well of stories is that second World War (and usually the sequel comes up short). Film makers bring us tales often unknown by the general public. Last (and endured) week, we were given a new spin on II’s predecessor WW I in THE OTTOMAN LIEUTENANT (mind you a fiction story with a real historical backdrop). This week sees another little known story of the war in Europe. Less than a year ago, an assassination plot against a high-ranking Nazi stationed in Czechoslovakia was dramatized in ANTHROPOID (still sounds like a monster movie to me). And at last year’s Academy Awards the story of the Sonderkommandos, SON OF SAUL, took home the Oscar for Best Foreign Language Film. This week’s new release travels a bit north for a view of the war. Actually, it’s not the war, but rather post-war, with the ink still drying on the peace treaties. But things are still far from peaceful. Oh, and this film scored an Oscar nom, though THE SALESMAN took home the statuette last month. With the recent hit animated film, many may think of Denmark as the land of Lego, but for this new film it’s the LAND OF MINE.

It’s May of 1945, Germany has finally surrendered, but Danish Sgt. Carl Rasmussen (Roland Moller) is still in full combat mode. After venting his rage on a group of defeated enemy soldiers, he is given his post-war assignment. He will oversee a group of German prisoners-of-war as they find and disarm several hundred landmines buried in the beach on the West Coast of Denmark (the Axis believed that this would be the locale for the Allied invasion). Incredibly dangerous work, but the sergeant believes they should “clean up the mess they made”. Then when he meets his charges, the grizzled military man is stunned. The fourteen POWs look to be barely over 14, more boys than men. Nonetheless, he escorts them to their ocean front locale, a rundown shack that’s deserted save for a small cottage and farmhouse nearby occupied by a young single mother and her six year-old daughter. Carl and his trusty dog oversee the boys as the carefully poke the sand and clear the beach (luckily they have a crude map of the landmine placement). These boys must carry on this deadly mission while dealing with a lack of food (prisoners are low priority while the locals are hungry). As the days pass, the sergeant gets to know his crew, especially the twins Ernst and Werner (Emil and Oskar Belton), their high-ranking office, the twitchy Helmut (Joel Basman), and their real leader, the compassionate Sebastian (Louis Hofmann). Surprising himself, Carl begins to respect the lads, perhaps they have released his paternal instincts. He soon realizes that the military’s promise to send the boys home once the beach is cleared may not be kept. What can he do? And what will he do?

This largely unknown historical tidbit from over 70 years ago makes for an interesting story, but the talented ensemble are what makes it so compelling. Luckily the story’s main focus is expertly portrayed by the riveting Moller as a very tough but complex soldier. In the powerful opening scene he is truly a Sergeant fury, a “clenched fist” of a man nearly as explosive as any hidden landmine. Rasmussen insists that the age of his charges doesn’t matter, he only sees the uniform of the enemy. We’re not told of his background or family, but we wonder if he’s lost everything and everyone aside from his loyal pooch, the only recipient of his smile. Slowly we see his icy demeanor begin to melt, but not without enormous resistance. Finally he begins to question himself and his superiors, as the fallen foes become human beings in his eyes. One superior, Liuetenant Ebbe played by Mikkel Boe Folsgaard, never has such an epiphany, his humanity almost replaced by his cold dead-eyed stare. The POWs are composed of a group of superb actors, with Hofmann outstanding as the kind, older brother surrogate Sebastian to the group. Eventually he breaks through to the sergeant, even engaging in a sweet, almost father-son discussion of faith. Basman’s character is a bit more complex, as his Helmut is equal parts venal and pathetic, trying to appear tough, while taunting his brothers in arms. Speaking of brothers, The Belton twins as the Lessner sibs have perhaps the most heartbreaking subplot. When tragedy strikes, one of them becomes one of the walking dead, a haunted soul now completely lost. He reminds everyone of their possible gruesome fate.

Writer/director Martin Zanvilet has crafted a remarkable war drama devoid of gun-blazing battles, but just as spellbinding and suspenseful. While we squirm in our seats during the tense defusion sequences , he also gives us a moral quandary to consider. Yes, these soldiers were part of Hitler’s army, but with the war finished, how long must they pay the price for their homeland’s evil? Most look far too young to be part of the Axis forces. Perhaps in those last days any boy who could hold a rifle was scooped up, torn from their families, destined to be “cannon fodder”. As the sergeant says, “As they are dying, they cry for their mammas”. Certainly the Danes suffered, but many became “sore winners”, hoping that the “mine scrubbers” would be erased by their country’s own weapons. This gives an extra heft to the scenes in which the lads outline their unlikely future plans (“I will work in a factory” “I just want to EAT!”). It’s challenging fare for audiences used to just rooting for the “good guys” to triumph over the “bad guys”. LAND OF MINE is a bold statement on the rules of combat and morality that explodes our ideas about “peace time”.

4 out of 5

LAND OF MINE opens everywhere and screens exclusively in the St. Louis area at Landmark’s Plaza Frontenac Cinemas

landofmineposter

ALLIED – Review

allied

“It’s still the same old story…”, but told it a new way. That old story being one of a couple that finds romance during wartime. In the case of this new film, that time is the early 1940’s, soon after the US entered World War II. There have been lots of great romances set in that period, such as THE ENGLISH PATIENT and, of course, CASABLANCA. As a matter of fact, this new film begins in that exact locale. But while other movies would do the final fade-out with its stars driving off into the desert (usually toward the setting sun), this tale’s drama is just starting. That drama is when two people from different worlds are united by a global threat, then soon become more than a couple ALLIED by war.

The aforementioned desert fills the screen in the film’s opening shot. French Morocco’s hills and dunes are the landing spot for a lone parachutist. Soon he’s picked up by a local driving a battered dusty sedan. The driver gives his passenger, Canadian pilot/special agent Max Vartan (Brad Pitt), a package containing finely tailored suits and several bits of I.D. (passport, etc.). Arriving in Casablanca, he changes clothes and heads into a bar to meet, for this first time, the agent posing as his wife. She is French resistance fighter Marianne Beausejour (Marion Cotillard), who has spent the last few weeks setting up their “cover identities” as sophisticated “ex-pats” and has become part of the town’s high society inner circle. This will earn them an invite to a fancy reception, which is the goal of their mission. While they train and prepare, Max and Marianne engage in playful banter, as they try to deny their mutual attraction. Until one day their defensive barriers melt away. When the mission is over, they cannot go their separate ways. Max returns to London where he works on bringing Marianne through the proper immigration channels. After many months, they are reunited and are soon wed. As they begin a family, Max is given a devastating assignment by a “V” agent conducting an internal investigation. This new mission may destroy his new-found happiness. Can he bring himself to complete it?

For a modern film with all the subject and setting of an “old-fashioned” “golden age” Hollywood movie, who could they cast that would emit the high-powered glamorous star power of a Bogie and Bacall or a Gable and Lombard.? Well, the producers have got a good 21st Century version in Pitt and Cotillard. Pitt brings a stoic world-weary quality to the determined soldier. He studies every new person, scans every new setting in order to be in control of every situation. This makes his second act conflict so powerful. Max is not in control any longer. Too much is left to chance, things are out of his hands. Plus the interminable waiting is unbearable.Pitt shows us that Max is only in his element when the bullets are flying. Cotillard’s Marianne is an excellent sparring partner and social guide to him. She’s confident, smart, and unwilling to defer to Max. We understand why she’s charmed the upper crust of Morocco, while learning their habits and foibles. Domesticity doesn’t dull her wits in the least. She can still read Max like a book. They make for the sexiest, most charming spy duo since, well, MR. & MRS. SMITH. The pair is superbly supported by Jared Harris, bulldog tough and sympathetic as Max’s commander Frank Heslop and Lizzy Caplan as Max’s concerned solider sister Bridget, whose open Lesbian lifestyle doesn’t seem to offend a soul.

Following up last year’s spectacular, but little scene THE WALK, veteran director Robert Zemeckis gives the story a classic movie sheen, balancing the mood-drenched dialogue exchanges with pulse-pounding action sequences. The opening mission and a jail assault are true “nail-biters”. More importantly, he knows how to linger on a look of longing or a smouldering glance. Zemeckis somehow makes being stranded in a sandstorm improbably sexy. Of course, the swooning subtle score by Alan Silvestri and the warm lush cinematography from Don Burgess add much to the mood. Oh, and that 1940’s mood is expertly recreated by a score of terrific artists. Special kudos should go to costume designer Joanna Johnston who makes Pitt and Cotillard a dazzling power couple. She glides through the mayhem in a shimmering variety of vintage gowns, while he goes from jaunty beige three-piece suits and fedoras to an impeccable black tuxedo. In one sequence they stroll through the streets evoking the Lazlos heading to the Blue Parrot in the 1943 iconic flick. Steven Knight’s script is particularly strong in those early scenes, while the pace slows a bit much during the last act making the film seem too long (just a tad over two hours). Still, if you’re in the mood for a modern take on a “late show” staple that sparkles with high “star” wattage then join Pitt and Cotillard’s alliance in ALLIED.

4 Out of 5

allied-poster

S.L.I.F.F. Review: ‘The Boy in the Striped Pajamas’

Ram Man:

This is the most unique look at the genocide that went on in Nazi Germany during World War II. Mark Herman’s new film ‘The Boy In The Striped Pajamas’ looks at the war and the holocaust through the eyes of an innocent 8 year old German boy named Bruno. Herman adapted his screenplay from the John Boyne novel of the same name.

The story begins with Bruno’s father (David Thewlis of the Harry Potter series), an SS officer in Hitlers army, excepting a promotion and informing the family they are moving out of Berlin. Bruno is opposed to the move and doesn’t want to leave his friends. His mother (Vera Farmigia from the Departed) does the best job she can selling the country and tells Bruno he will have lots of friends there. Bruno’s twelve year old sister is fine once they arrive at the Country house and spots a young German officer she can flirt with.

We soon learn Bruno’s father’s promotion is to be commandant of a concentration camp a few kilometers from the house. Bruno , starving for companionship, begins to explore the house and it’s surroundings. He spies, what he refers to as a farm, out his window. Bruno asks his mother why are all the farmers wearing pajamas? Just as his mother begins to answer him one of the workers from the camp brings in fresh vegetables from the garden. She then simply answers “I don’t know”. Bruno’s mother is infuriated with her husband for deceiving her and the kids by landing them within earshot and smell of the camp. Bruno, bored out of his mind, goes against his parents wishes and explores the back yard and finds himself at the fence of the farm.

Bruno finds another boy inside the farm the same age as him. His name is Smuel. Bruno responds “I’ve never heard of anyone called Shmuel..” and Shmuel responds “I’ve never heard of anyone called Bruno”. The two boys hit it of and start up a limited friendship. Limited by an electric fence that separates them. Bruno then begins daily visits to play and talk to Shmuel. Bruno would bring him food and a checkers game so that they could play at their picnic. The two exchange details of their lives and their families. These two boys are able to look at each other instead of just seeing ethnicity or politics. Bruno does ask Shmuel “Why are you in there?” Shmuel replies “I’m a Jew”. As far as Bruno knew this was his first encounter with a Jewish person and he didn’t believe everything he heard others say about them. He liked Shmuel, he was his friend.

We have had numerous films that deal with the touchy subject of the Holocaust. This is the first film that actually tells it in a way that can be seen by the whole family and can serve to educate the children of today about a black spot in human history.   ‘The Boy In The Striped Pajamas’ will have your heart racing in the end of the film. I can’t tell you why, but it is culmination of this fantastic film.   Mark Herman also braves to take the view inside one of the gas chambers to show the final moments many faced at one of these camps. ‘The Boy In The Striped Pajamas’ was a wonderful film that I recommend to everyone. Parents , if your kids are ten or older, take them to see this film. It will educate them. I have a feeling when the DVD is out they will be watching it in history class at school. [Overall: 4 stars out of 5]

Festival Screening Date: Sunday, November 16 @ 12:00 noon (St Louis Art Museum)