We Are Movie Geeks All things movies… as noted by geeks.

October 15, 2015

BEASTS OF NO NATION – The Review

Filed under: Review — Tags: , , , — Jim Batts @ 5:15 pm

beastsofnonation

Cinema can often be a doorway to witness events going on far from your hometown theatre (or multiplex). I’m talking of real events, often things more horrific than anything screenwriters can type up. Just last year a Best Picture Oscar went to 12 YEARS A SLAVE, which was based on a memoir from over a hundred years ago. SCHINDLER’S LIST also took the big prize nearly twenty years ago for a true tale from, then, just fifty years in the past. The tale told in this new film is ongoing, even as we view the story from the comfort of our theatre seats. It’s the tragedy of the use of child soldiers, boys not yet ten years old, in the near constant civil wars that plague the African continent. Yes, it was a part of the recent films THE GOOD LIE and MACHINE GUN PREACHER, but this new release puts us side by side with a young boy as he is swept up into a sea of brutality. Much has been made in the movie industry press about the fact that this is the first theatrical release from Netflix, the company known for streaming film through the internet into your home. They could’ve gone with a frothy “rom-com” or a CGI-filled fantasy adventure, something fun and “safe”. Instead they went with one of the most powerful, important motion pictures of the year, BEASTS OF NO NATION.

This is the story of Agu (Abraham Attah), who also narrates his story, a young lad of eight or nine. He lives a poor, but idyllic life in his dusty (unnamed) African village. It’s in a “buffer zone” a protected area from the battles being waged between the governments forces and armed rebels. Agu attends school, plays with his buddies (they make “imagin-TV”), helps his parents and siblings. But then the “zone” is dissolved and word comes that the fighting will soon be at their doorsteps. Because of the lack of motor vehicles, only the women and babies can be sent away, to the nation’s capital. There’s no room for Agu on the last truck leaving, so he will stay with his father and big brother. When the tanks roll in, they try to hide along with the rest of the men of the town. But the soldiers find them and accuse them of being rebels. Agu escapes the execution and dashes into the jungle. The hungry and frightened boy is soon picked up by a gang of rebels hiding in the wilderness. The troop’s leader, Commandant (Idris Elba) tells his underlings that Agu could be of some use since “little fingers can pull triggers”. Agu has no choice but to be trained to kill. Alongside his new friend and mentor, the silent Strika (Emmanuel Nii Adorn Quaye), the ragtag rebels cut a bloody trail through the land. Soon, Agu gives up hope of being with his beloved mother and younger siblings and becomes a brutal single-minded soldier.

The best known actor in the cast is, of course, the talented Mr. Elba. Why he’s part of the “Marvel movie universe” as Thor’s pal Heimdall and his name is frequently bandied about as the next 007 via several online campaigns. So it may surprise many moviegoers that he’s portraying such a throughly despicable person in this new film. And bravo to him for lending his efforts and fame to this production. We can understand why the Commandant has mesmerized these young men and boys. He looms over nearly everyone, speaking in an almost gutteral growl that intimidates and inspires. He’s equal parts father, wizard, and perhaps the fiercest of beasts. As formidable a performance as Elba gives, it’s in service to the astounding, heart-breaking debut of Attah as Agu. We see this hostile world through his unblinking eyes, a witness to unremitting horror and brutality. In the film’s opening, carefree minutes, he could be any playful, sweet child of ours, that mischievous son, nephew, cousin. When evil visits his world, Attah shows us the confusion and panic as he is suddenly on his own. He gives us a look at how his childhood is ripped away, how a boy can be turned into an uncaring weapon. The promising light in his eyes becomes dulled until he’s merely a killing robot. What little humanity that’s left is seen when with his only friend Strika played by the mute Quaye, who conveys his lost innocence without words, so scarred that he has no use for speech. These phenomenal young men are the heart and soul of this sad saga.

Cary Joji Fukunaga earned much acclaim last year for his direction of the entire first season (eight hours) of HBO’s hit “True Detective” and now establishes himself as a major film making force with his triple threat work here in direction, screen adaptation (from the novel by Uzodinma Iweala) and cinematography. He expertly goes from the tranquil beauty of nature in the training scenes to the chaos and madness of the conflict. Cary pulls no punches as the boys are forced to take a life, we’re right next to them as they spill blood for the first, and far from last, time. Every bit of abuse of these boys, the physical, verbal, and sexual are captured with an unflinching eye. This is a passionate expose, a call to action that never overshadows the personal story of Agu, who may represent thousands still trapped in the same Hellish torment. Despite the subtitles you may strain to decipher the dialogue, but the unforgettable images will pull you along, until these “freedom fighters” give in to ego and petty jealousy. The intense matter and violence may be the reason why the film has no rating, although it stars children, it’s really not for their viewing (it’s probably because one of the rebels has an aversion to…pants). But for mature, serious audiences BEASTS OF NO NATION is one of the strongest, dramatic cinema experiences ever.

4.5 Out of 5

BEASTS OF NO NATION streams on Netflix starting on October 16. It  also opens in theatres everywhere and screens exclusively in St. Louis at Landmark’s Tivoli Theatre

beastsofnonationposter

 

 

FREEHELD – The Review

Filed under: Review — Tags: , , , , , , , — Jim Batts @ 4:36 pm

freeheld

It’s been said time and again that major changes in the law and society can actually begin with one person,… or two. You know how just a pebble can gather momentum and bring about an avalanche that can alter the landscape. This new feature film docudrama tells such a story. Its subject is one still discussed, especially with the presidential campaigns starting so very early. The story begins just ten years ago, not that long before the sweeping changes concerning marriage which lead to equality throughout these united states. But at this time there were only “civil unions” which we often denied same-sex couples the rights that straight couples took for granted. Yes, this film is based on a true story, one that has been brought to the screen before, as a documentary short subject back in 2007. And it won an Oscar, too! The new dramatic adaptation shares its title with that earlier film also: FREEHELD.

The story begins with the look at the dangerous profession of Ocean County New Jersey police officer Laurel Hester (Julianne Moore), as she helps take down a drug-selling gang. She has the respect of all at the precinct, especially her macho, womanizing police partner Dane Wells (Michael Shannon). But Laurel keeps her personal life a secret from them: she is a lesbian. This prompts her to socialize many miles away from her home and work. At a volleyball game she meets the several years younger Stacie Andree (Ellen Page), an auto mechanic. After an awkward first date, almost ended when a closeted co-worker spots them, a tentative romance begins, after Stacie accepts Laurel’s need for discretion. Soon they decide to start a home, and Laurel purchases a house the two will share. When he arrives unannounced with a housewarming present, Dane meets Stacie and learns, and accepts the truth, about his partner. All is idyllic until a routine check-up on a persistent bruise shatters their world. Laurel has cancer that’s rapidly spreading through her body. As she retires from the force, Laurel sets about denoting Stacie as the recipient of her policemen’s pension, insuring that she will be able to live in the house they share. But county law doesn’t recognize civil unions and refuses the request. After being ignored at the meetings of the county’s board of “chosen freeholders” (hence the title), a local newspaper reporter contacts gay rights activist Steven Goldstein (Steve Carell), who makes the case of Laurel and Stacie the celebrated cause of Garden State Equality with the hope that justice is served before the decorated policewoman passes away.

The always impressive, and most recent long-overdue Best Actress Oscar winner, Ms. Moore bring every facet of the complex Laurel to dazzling life, making the spokeswomen for sexual equality into a warm, endearing human being. With her feathered “Farrah” blonde hairstyle, she could’ve made this “Joizee” lady cop into a caricature, but we see Laurel’s longing, yearning, tempered by fear and trepidation. We can imagine how tough it must have been to get the law enforcement “boys club” to accept her which spurs her concern over what would happen if her life was exposed. Moore shows her joy and finally finding the love of her life, which makes her descent into disease even more heart-wrenching. Page ‘s Stacie doesn’t have such an extreme conflict, but can’t quite comprehend the need for such secrecy. This tough, garage whiz is quite a change from her more eloquent, cerebral staple of role (she’s no “grease monkey” spin on JUNO) and page gives us a peek on her intense determination coupled with Stacie love and concern for Laurel. It’s only near the end of their public battle that Stacie finally dwells on her fading love. Shannon follows up his superb villainous supporting turn in 99 HOLMES with take on a brusque, tough guy whose surly exterior shields a soft, supportive soul. Dane is a faithful partner, no matter the curveballs thrown his way. When Laurel comes out to him, he’s not angry over her orientation, but rather that she felt she couldn’t share it with him. During the legal battles, he’s truly in her corner, though not as vocal or voracious as Carell playing the loud and proud Goldstein. Although he seems too flamboyant at times (as if he just popped in straight from an episode of TV’s “Will & Grace”), Carrell brings a needed comic energy to the politics and pain of the film’s last act. Also of note is TV vet Josh Charles as the “freeholder” who just may be swayed, and who fights to change the mind and hearts of his fellow members.

The film’s direction by Peter Sollett (NICK AND NORAH’S INFINITE PLAYLIST) is fairly standard and straightforward, never resorting to flashy tricks or narrative techniques that will lose the story’s focus on Laurel and Stacie. Ron (PHILADELPHIA) Nyswaner’s screenplay wisely delves into the love story with a sweet, sensitive touch, until the eventual legal declaration and occasional “speech-ifyin”. The score from Hans Zimmer never hammers at the heart-strings. Ultimately the film’s structure and scope never seems breaks the bounds of a cable TV effort, it’s a “super-special Lifetime movie event. This feels especially true when the story becomes a medical “tear-jerker”. Kudos, however, for showing Laurel’s chain-smoking, so that it doesn’t seem that the lung cancer comes outta’ nowhere. As she begins her long fade-out, Laurel almost becomes a martyr figure, suffering stemming from the injustices from close-minded society. It’s then that the fil almost wallows in her pain as she must trudge to those all-too familiar council chambers once again. Her story is an important one, but despite the terrific cast FREEHELD remains shackled by its dramatic deficiencies, when it should take flight.

3 Out of 5

FREEHELD opens everywhere and screens exclusively in the St. Louis area at Landmark’s Tivoli Theatre

freeheldposter

October 9, 2015

DRUNK STONED BRILLIANT DEAD – The Review

drunkstoned1

Attention comedy geeks everywhere! To paraphrase a literary classic, this new documentary feature lets us all “look back in laughter” at one of the most influential humor magazines of the last fifty years. Actually its legacy reaches on past its newstand existence. Yes, it’s been absent from newsstands (there’s still a few of them left) for nearly twenty years. But, to paraphrase again, we’ve come “not to bury this magazine, but to praise it”. And to recall the chuckles and the mini-empire it spawned. Of course, this wasn’t the first humor publication. Puck paved the way decades before. Then Mad magazine shook up the staid 1950’s. But by 1970, that mag had somewhat settled into a (still entertaining) routine, poking fun at suburbia, and wasn’t connecting with the “counter-culture”. Younger “baby boomers” wanted their humor to have a sharper edge, to reflect the “hippie” spirit, and so they turned to the “underground comix”, the realm of artists like Robert Crumb, Jay Lynch, and Skip Williamson, which were sold at “head” shops and other alternative venues. Then in 1970, a magazine tried to bridge that gap between Mad and the comix. It was sharp, stinging satire and parody. And along with the wit, there were lots of jokes about corporate America, rock music, drugs, and, to the delight of its mostly teenage readership, sex. in the pix of many, many topless ladies. Time to peer behind the scenes of that seventies (and early eighties) institution with (here’s the complete title) DRUNK STONED BRILLIANT DEAD: THE STORY OF THE NATIONAL LAMPOON.

Of course the story of Nat Lamp really begins in the sixties, with the college institution, the Havard Lampoon. By then their magazine parodies became quite sophisticated. Now here’s one of the many interesting tidbits this doc unearths: Mademoiselle magazine approached the college editors to do a parody of them as a great publicity stunt. Inspired by idea, and the cash, the college staff plunged in. This generated the spark to go past the college and venture into the murky waters of the magazine world. The film zeros in on the original editors, Henry Beard, Doug Kenney, and Robert Hoffman. We see the mag’s shaky start with its trippy “graphix” and attempt to ape Mad with a weird cartoon duck mascot. There’s insight from the still lovable huckster former publisher Matty Simmons, who became the “godfather” to the young group, a fella’ who looked more like a used car salesman than the guiding force behind these subversives. And then we catch up with Michael Gross , the art director who gave NL a slick professional look (if you’re gonna’ do funny stamp make them look like the real thing). We’re treated to lots of terrific art from that golden era (didya’ know that Frank Frazetta and Neal Adams were contributors?). Soon, other writers made their mark, like Michael O’Donoghue, Tony Hendra (a Brit TV star!) Chris Miller, and PJ O”Rourke. Much of their work still has a real “bite” (that “Vietnamese Baby Book” still smarts!). There are even interviews with the men that sold advertising space (a tip of the cocktail glass to Jose Cuervo). Slowly the brand branches off and expands to the stage with “National Lampoon’s Lemmings” (great old video footage of Chevy Chase, John Belushi, and Gilda Radner) and the later “National Lampoon Show” (hey, there’s young Bill Murray). The doc gives lets us a listen to their first comedy record “Radio Dinner” and the syndicated weekly dose of mirth and mayhem “The National Lampoon Radio Hour”. With the jump into book publishing, the doc devotes a much deserved chunk of time to what many people consider to be the mag’s supreme comedy achievement, the still scathingly hilarious “National Lampoon 1964 High School Yearbook Parody”. Simmons says that NBC approached him about creating a weekend live comedy/variety late night show (he says they passed, sot wishing for their talent to be stretched too thin). Finally Hollywood makes them that “offer you can’t refuse” and we hear of the mega-smash ANIMAL HOUSE with lots of insight from director John Landis. This plus lots of behind the scenes footage and stories from cast members Tim Matheson and Kevin Bacon. Their next huge movie hit, NATIONAL LAMPOON’S VACATION, is also profiled with stories of its creator John Hughes, director Harold Ramis, and quips from Chevy Chase and Beverly D’Angelo. Along the course of the film we also hear from NL admirers like Billy Bob Thorton and Judd Apatow. This is one wild, funny trip through a true comedy kingdom.

Director/co-writer Douglas Tirola (along with co-writer Mark Monroe) aren’t re-inventing the documentary form with what seems at times to be a really well-researched bonus feature on the next super deluxe home video edition of ANIMAL HOUSE (hey, it’s been over two years, so it’s probably due for yet another re-issue). It’s told in a fairly straight-ahead chronological order (“then they did this, which led to this…”) and the interview subjects are the same basic talking heads (although there are some neat background knickknacks in view). But happily, the pace is jazzed up with some great graphic images from the mag’s pages and nifty limited animation enhancing some of the best gag cartoons (be sure and wait for the rolling Sam Gross-drawn frog). What actually surprised me was the way that the doc began to focus in on the funny yet sad and tragic story of Doug Kenney, the founder perhaps best known as the bespectacled Delta House veteran (“What are we supposed ta’ do, ya’ MORON!!”). The subtitle of the doc could be “The Seduction of Doug K”. He was engulfed by the vices of tinsel town and almost becomes a poster child for all the excesses of the flashy, coke-fueled 70’s and 80’s. His end became a harsh “wake up call” for those “over-indulgers”. Actually it would make a great solo doc or a dramatic/comedic bio-pic (Will Forte? Clark Duke?). I just wish the doc could have touched on the great “funny pages” section (No Vaughn “Cheech Wizard” Bode?) and the superb “Sunday Newspaper Parody” which revisited the 64′ Yearbook world. That’s being a bit nitpicky, but if they can run a few seconds of “Disco Beaver from Outer Space”? But (semi-) seriously this is an entertaining and informative look at a time before political correctness, when comedy burst its shackles and seemed to cover the globe.Without this mag would we have “Saturday Night Live”, “The Onion”, “Funny or Die” or “Adult Swim”. Uh-uh. And if you listen closely you can still catch the echos of raucous laughter generated by the lunatics of the Lampoon. Thank you Mona Gorilla!

4 Out of 5

DRUNK STONED BRILLIANT DEAD opens everywhere and plays exclusively in the St. Louis area at Landmark’s Tivoli Theatre

drunkstonedpster

 

 

October 8, 2015

99 HOMES – The Review

Filed under: Review — Tags: , , , — Jim Batts @ 10:06 pm

99holmes

Hello class, welcome to cinema economics 101. Before you start rolling your eyes, I should tell you that this isn’t about how producers raise the cash in order to fund your favorite flicks. No, we’re going to take a look at the latest entry in Hollywood’s flicks about finance: the very high ups and the low, low downs. This film joins the ranks of the WALL STREET series, with more than a passing nod to ARBITRAGE, GLENNGARY GLEN ROSS, and BOILER ROOM (and the soon to premiere THE BIG SHORT). Don’t be too concerned with the poster’s “based on real events” boast because it’s not about one incident, but an overall economic disaster that’s still affecting a whole lotta’ people. We’re talking the very recent housing boom and inevitable bust. How recent? Let’s turn the clock back just five years as we examine one’s man’s greedy desire to acquire, at any cost to those already living there, 99 HOMES.

The story begins on a particularly muggy Orlando, Florida afternoon in 2010, as real estate broker Rick Carver (Michael Shannon) must deal with an unexpected “problem” while evicting a family from their home. He’s pals with the local PD who aid in the “removals”. Meanwhile construction worker Dennis Nash (Andrew Garfield) has lost another gig, a shutdown just as the  house’s frame was set up. Frustrated, he returns to the family home her shares with his mother Lynn (Laura Dern) and preteen son Connor (Noah Lomax), whose mom is out of the picture. Soon Dennis is in court trying to save said home from the bank. After he’s given 90 days to pay up his debt, he begins a futile effort to get work. To his shock, Rick along with his work crew, and the police are on his doorstep with an eviction notice. Despite his pleads (his lawyer has the proper forms), Dennis and his mother and son are given two minutes to collect their things. After going to an extended stay motel ( a new home for many other displaced families), Dennis realizes some of his tools are missing. He finds Carver’s crew and confronts them just as they are to begin work on a house. When problems arise, Carver offers Dennis a cash job. The desperate man takes it, which leads to more work, and eventually an apprentice position with the ruthless broker. While keeping the nature of his work a secret from his family, Dennis hopes to earn enough cash to buy back their old digs. But at what cost to his soul?

The story could be called “The Seduction of Dennis Nash” since we’re seeing this world of despair and temptation through the eyes of this struggling single father. Garfield conveys his moral conflict with a subtle strength and proves that he’s so much more than a “web-slinger”. During his initial court appearance he lets us see the confusion and denial in his eyes and hesitant body language. It’s as if he’s saying, “I’m an honest, hard-working guy. This is not supposed to happen in the good ole’ US of A!”. Then when he’s kicked out, we witness his frustration and panic soon followed by helpless resignation and a feeling of failure, that he’s let everyone down. This leads to his quick descent into Carver’s world. During a powerful montage, we see the job eating away at him. He can’t help but feel the pain of all those displaced. The same can’t be said of his boss, who has expunged all empathy from his being. It’s the “show-ier”, more flamboyant role and the always interesting Mr. Shannon hits it out of the park. Like a vulture he swoops in on the unfortunate and desperate, but he’s also a deadly shark who must always keep moving,while devouring more and more. With his intimidating steely glare (the guy always looks P.O.’d!), Shannon turns this low rent southern Gordon Gekko into a true Mephisto, who dangles the keys to the good life in front of Dennis’s face. He’s got no attachment to anything, particularly these homes (“Nothin’ but boxes…just boxes”). When he gives a pep talk referring to Noah’s Ark, he becomes a memorable, devious bad guy who could actually live in any town. Dern provides the moral anchor to the story, as she tries to hide her desperation and confusion over being booted out of her long-time home. Still it’s tough to accept her now in a grandmother roles (in the last couple of years she went from being the mom of Shailene Woodley and Reese Witherspoon).

Director/co-writer Ramin Bahrani (AT ANY PRICE) has gotten some great work from that cast, but the script (done with Amir Naderi and Bahareh Azimi) ultimately stumbles in the film’s final half hour with a “macguffin” like bogus legal form which could destroy all of Carver’s schemes (kind of like that convenient level that blows up the lab in BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN). This twist seems forced and plays like a plot device to bring along a big dramatic finale’. It’s a shame since the preceding hour or so plays like a true modern horror story. Once Dennis hops into bed (not literally) with Carver, despair and tragedy follows him at every turn. A scene where he ejects a confused, elderly man out of his home (“I got nobody”) will crush your heart like an eggshell. Despite the story flaws this is a must see for fans of Garfield and the enigmatic Shannon, so if you’re in the mood for a sobering tale (many times you may think “There for the grace of…”) then you should take a tour of 99 HOMES.

3.5 Out 5

99homesposter

 

October 2, 2015

FINDERS KEEPERS (2015) – The Review

Finders Keepers 1

How can anyone argue with the rules of our childhood? Finder’s keepers is as sacred an adolescent law of survival as calling shotgun of implementing the infamous triple dog dare. But, what happens when we employ these tactics in adult life? One possible eventuality plays out in real life as the subject matter of a new documentary from Bryan Carberry and J. Clay Tweel.

FINDER’S KEEPERS follows the antics of two men, John Wood and Shannon Whisnant. John Wood lost his leg in a small plane crash that killed his father. Shannon Whisnant is an entrepreneurial picker who purchases the contents of a storage unit at an auction and discovers John Wood’s amputated leg inside a smoker grill within the storage unit he purchased.

You may be asking “how does something like this transpire?” Believe it or not, it all makes sense once the film explains the circumstances, but none of that changes the fact that truth is so often stranger than fiction and some real people are far better characters than can be written. John and Shannon are similar in ways, but are essentially polar opposites when it comes to how they view the world.

The filmmakers who brought us this film may have seen a quirky diamond in the rough, but FINDER’S KEEPERS does manage to tell an interesting story of human desires, delving into what makes these two curious characters tick. On the surface, the film feels like something hosted by Maury Povich or Jerry Springer, with absurdly eccentric characters quarreling over the silliest or strangest of squabbles. However, as the film progresses, the underlying human drama emerges, peeking its head out from behind the cantankerous curtains that separate these two men, revealing some raw emotion of illustrates the true fragility of human dreams and passion.

FINDER’S KEEPERS is not perfect. Few, if any films truly are, but in this case, it’s misleading. In all fairness and full disclosure, I’ll freely admit it took me two viewing to appreciate this film. Upon my first experience, I found the film to be funny and enjoyable, if not even interesting on a tabloid level. The laughter continued, and then a bit less, then a bit less, and I found the level of interest I had in the film was waning and I was growing bored. This was not a good sign.

Then, as any decent critic should at least consider doing, I gave the film a second chance. Still not perfect, but with this second viewing is when all the undercurrents of humanity poked through the surface sludge of silly sensationalistic slander. FINDERS KEEPERS was actually addressing the inner dreamer in all of us, even if we don’t look or talk or behave like these two men, it’s still essentially our story. There is something desired, but it’s just out of reach, despite of perseverance.

As Shrek would say, “people are like onions.” This is true, and not just in that some people stink. People have layers, many layers and these layers are not all the same. There’s not always a pearl within, but the process of peeling away the outer, decaying layers serves to reveal the true self. FINDERS KEEPERS does this for John and Shannon, but in two distinctly different directions.

John Wood is a man whose had a long, hard run of bad luck and poor choices he now lives with while trying to reconcile. He may have began his life in the luxury of a wealthy household, but for better or worse, it’s the choices we make that define us… FINDERS KEEPERS is a film about those choices.

While the film does become somewhat repetitive in its content, it’s a short feature film, running a pleasantly well-paced 82 minutes. While the intent, I believe, is to stay impartial, the truth of the matter is that we rarely ever feel sympathy for Shannon. We find ourselves empathetic for both characters, but ultimately Shannon is the heel, the villain, the antagonist. John, on the other hand, is clearly the protagonist, made out as the victim and showcased as the more likable character, despite his flaws.

The problem with Shannon is that he’s not an easy guy to like, even if we find a bit of ourselves in his persona, a bit of that dreamer or and rebel combined. FINDERS KEEPERS fails to compel its audience into caring much about its central characters, but it does raise some interesting philosophical questions, such as… if I buy a grill at an auction and find a human body part inside, do I retain the rights to that body part as goods purchased, or does the body parts’ owner retain the right to claim it back?

Something to think about.

Overall Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars

FIKETH-001_OneSheet_FM (1)

October 1, 2015

THE MARTIAN – The Review

themartian

We’re almost a week into the Fall, a time for serious stuff at the cinema, not saucers and BEMs (bug-eyed monsters). Well, hold on to your ray-guns, this isn’t a Summertime sci-fi staple with a much delayed release date. You see, the title character is actually an Earthman, but he’s also an alien since he’s not on his home planet. Huh? And this isn’t a tale set hundreds of years in the future, or is it set “a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away” (gotta’ wait another ten weeks or so for that). No, this is set in the very near future (unlike that other star franchise), plus it’s rooted pretty much in the realities of space travel. No warp drives or matter transporters here, so star hopping takes a long, l-o-n-g time. Oh, and this flick’s main setting has been making headlines lately (that loud sigh of relief you may be hearing comes from the Fox marketing gurus). For you see, although Mark Watney wasn’t born on the angry red planet, during this story he is THE MARTIAN.

Excuse me if I sound like a famous beagle author, but…it was a dark and stormy night…on the planet Mars. Said storm is bearing down on the intrepid crew of the Ares 3, the pride of NASA’s exploration mission. As those brave astronauts struggle to return to the ship, the violent wind propels a satellite dish into one of the crewmen with the force of a cannonball. Mark Watney is swallowed up into the dust and darkness. His suit is not transmitting any vital signs. Captain Lewis (Jessica Chastain) must make a very tough decision. Those strong winds threaten to topple the rocket which would strand them there (rescue would take months , perhaps over a year). The only option is to blast off and leave behind their fallen comrade. Back on Earth, mission control gets the bad news. The head of NASA, Sanders (Jeff Daniels), makes the formal announcement at a press conference overseen by public relations director Montrose (Kristen Wiig): the Ares crew has left Mars after the death of Mark Watney. But Watney pulls a Mark Twain and awakes after the storm has past. The dish knocked out his vital sign emitter. Dazed and injured he makes his way to the enclosed lab (the Martian Habitat or HAB) the crew had constructed. He’s got his work cut out for him. The supplies will run out long before Ares 4 arrives, so he’s got to grow some food in the reddish clay-like Martian soil. And he’s got to contact Earth. Thanks to his pluck and some old tech, Watney contacts mission control. Now Sanders has a new set of decisions. Tell the still traveling Lewis and her crewmates (Kate Mara, Michael Pena, Sebastian Stan, Aksel Hennie) of Watney’s survival? Hurriedly construct another rocket? As plans are made on Earth, Watney embarks on a long, lonely quest for survival.

The element that helps this makes this mainly Mars-bound epic soar is the winning performance of Matt Damon. I mean, if you’re going to be stuck on a big red rock then you’d be very fortunate to have him as company. In other films I’ve been struck by the great chemistry Damon has displayed with his co-stars, particularly the actresses (Emily Blunt in THE APPOINTMENT BUREAU, Dallas Bryce-Howard in THE HEREAFTER), so I was pleasantly surprised at how entertaining and engaging he is when he’s, just by himself ,usually talking straight to us as Watney, leaving a detailed video diary. He’s a unique screen hero who uses his intelligence rather than his brawn (or transports or weaponry) to triumph. We believe that he will, as he remarks, “Science the s*#t out of it!”. And despite his obstacles and setbacks never gives in to despair (although he does choke back a few tears). The film could easily get too wrapped up in space jargon, but Damon’s always ready to give this tech heavy story a smile along with a warm, beating heart. It’s a remarkable acting achievement worthy of all the accolades sure to come his way (and isn’t it about time that his screenplay Oscar got a playmate?).

But, despite its title, this flick isn’t a one man show. Damon is ably supported in space and on Earth. On the Ares 3, Chastain plays a decisive leader, although she lets us see Lewis’s agony over having to make the most difficult choice ever. Pena’s does a very entertaining riff on the affable space jockey, the wheel man always quick with a joke to take the edge off a dangerous situation. Mara bounces back nicely from some cinema setbacks as the computer whiz (just as her role in the FANTAST…never mind). Stan is a very courageous tethered retriever while the stoic Hennie surprises with hidden talents. Back on the “big, blue marble” Daniels injects a sardonic wit into the role of the big boss, and verbally spars with the energetic Chiwetel Ejiofor as the new guy who’s not afraid to ruffle some feathers. Just as she proved in DIARY OF A TEENAGE GIRL, screen comedy queen Wiig can be a great dramatic co-star. Sean Bean gives the team’s NASA rep, a strong, stubborn sense of purpose. And the great Donald Glover brings a manic, child-hood sense of joy as the brain that’s always thinking outside the box.

But the big talent that shoots this story past the stratosphere is the great Ridley Scott, who’s doing his best work in years, perhaps decades. This is a worthy companion to his futurist hat-trick begun with ALIEN and continued with BLADE RUNNER. This space saga never lags, never goes into free fall. And after making his name in lots of terrific TV from “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” to “Lost”, Drew Goddard establishes himself as a major screenwriting talent with this adaptation of the acclaimed novel by Andy Weir. The science never overwhelms the very human elements of this tale. It tells us to use our head, but never ignore your heart. Although it may often play as a modern re-staging of the 60’s cult classic ROBINSON CRUSOE ON MARS (minus the fantasy beasties), this feels like a truly fresh and original movie experience. Its sense of optimism and wonder soars where the recent TOMORROWLAND, and ,to an extent, last year’s INTERSTELLAR stumbled. Bravo to Harry Gregson-Williams for a subtle music score and to cinematographer Dariusz Wolski for making that alien soil a place of wonder, tranquility, and unexpected danger. Everyone involved are to be lauded for helping to make THE MARTIAN an adventurous, exploration cinema classic that will inspire generations to come.

5 Out of 5 Stars

themartianposter

 

COMING HOME (2014) – The Review

Filed under: Review — Tags: , , , — Jim Batts @ 5:24 pm

cominghome

Let’s get this out-of-the-way. This new film from China has nothing to do with the Oscar-winning 1970’s classic COMING HOME from director Hal Ashby. Mind you, there have been Asian remakes of English language films such as the BLOOD SIMPLE (the Coen brothers’ first flick) inspiring A WOMAN, A GUN, AND A NOODLE SHOP. This cinematic adaptation of a celebrated novel begins during the most repressive era of the Mao regime (perhaps when “Red China” was the most crimson), when the country had cut almost all ties with the West. It looks back at how the political climate was tearing families apart as the trio at this story’s center learns that all their problems do not end after the reunion in COMING HOME.

The film begins sometime during those turbulent 1960’s. Teenager Dan Dan (Huiwen Zhang) is focused on rehearsing for the upcoming auditions for the ballet celebrating the military, “The Red Detachment of Women”. She’s pulled out of the dance hall and told to report to the school administration office. There she is surprised to find her mother, “Yu” (Li Gong). They are told by law enforcement agents that the family patriarch Lu (Daoming Chen) has escaped from a re-education camp (a prison really) where he has been held for nearly a decade as a political dissident (a “rightist”). Yu and DanDan are told to contact the authorities if Lu approaches them. That night, in the hallway of her apartment building, DanDan encounters her father. The frightened girl tells him to leave, then rushes downstairs to see the agent stationed outside the building. Before he flees, Lu pushes a note under Yu’s door telling her to meet him at the train station the next morning. That next day, he is re-captured before they meet. Many years pass and the cultural revolution sweeps through the country. This prompts the release of all political prisoners including Lu. As he walks down the platform Lu is surprised to see DanDan waiting for him, but no sign of Yu. She takes him to her dormitory at the textile factory (she’s given up dance after her father’s past cost her the lead in the ballet). She tells him that they will go to see Yu after her shift is over, but Lu cannot wait. When he encounters his wife, she seems confused and distant. Later she thinks that Lu is a past tormentor named Fang. When DanDan arrives with some state officials they explains that Yu suffers from a form of trauma-induced amnesia. While he adjusts, they offer him a place to live in a vacant storefront across from there. A doctor tells him that something may trigger her old memories which inspires Lu to devote all his time and energies toward attempts (old photos, letter, food, music) to rekindle their love.

The three actors that form this family unit give strong, nuanced performances. The most famous of the trio, Gong takes on the far less showy, but very pivotal role as the mentally damaged mother. Her tightly withdrawn body language and soft eyes reflect how the cruelties of life that have almost worn her down while pushing her towards the confused fog that envelops her. But many times that fragile outer shell is used to protect her inner strengths as a survivor. The same may be said of Chen as the more proactive half of the couple. In the film’s more action-oriented first half, he’s trying to blend into those shadows, determined to be with his loved ones once more. Briefly Chen shows us Lu’s joy as he sees his love across the way at the station, however briefly. After his release he becomes a man on another mission with the mysteries of the mind rather than the law blocking him from Yu. Chen conveys those frustrations along with the delights of small victories that present a glimmer of hope. Zhang is pure razor-focused energy as the lead ballet role becomes her only goal, one that cost her dearly. In the film’s second act she shows us how time has smothered that inner fire. And there’s her despair over her damaged relationship with her mother who can only recall DanDan’s mistakes. The cast’s expert work completely draws us into this intimate story.

Director Yimou Zhang (HERO, HOUSE OF FLYING DAGGERS treats this script adaptation by Jingzhi Zou from Geling Yan’s novel with a strong steady, subtle hand, never going in for showy storytelling gimmicks. It unfolds at a natural, leisurely pace allowing us to drink in the period atmosphere and to appreciate the cast’s fine work. This is quite a balancing act, since the film’s first half almost plays as a thriller, capped off by a real nail-biting chase at the train station. Then it shifts gears into this slower quest into a deeply buried past with elements that may remind viewers of themes from STILL ALICE and THE NOTEBOOK. All this is shot with a soft brown glow that evokes a sense of nostalgia and regret. Lu is an unlikely hero who will not give up as he tries to rescue his wife from a mental monster that separates them. Despite the unfamiliar settings, COMING HOME is a quiet, intimate love story that will touch audiences around the globe.

3.5 Out of 5

COMING HOME opens everywhere and screens exclusively in the St. Louis area at Landmark’s Plaza Frontenac Cinemas

cominghomeposter

 

September 24, 2015

A BRAVE HEART: THE LIZZIE VELASQUEZ STORY – The Review

Filed under: Review — Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — Travis Keune @ 11:19 pm

abh_image02

Life is hard. Just speaking in general terms, the daily grind of modern life takes a toll on the human mind, body and spirit. Granted, we’ve done all this to ourselves, but still the drive to survive and succeed in life is a daunting endeavor. Now, consider you’re not “normal” by society’s standards? Consider the playing field is not level in your life, but rather has been shifted and upended to resemble something like a cruelly insane funhouse ride. Consider what it would be like to have an undiagnosed syndrome that, amongst other things, causes your body to look so abnormally different from everyone else as to be labeled a freak? How do you feel, right now?

A BRAVE HEART: THE LIZZIE VELASQUEZ STORY is a new documentary from director Sara Bordo that made waves and garnered immense support when it played at the SXSW Film Festival. As the title suggests, this is the story of Lizzie Velasquez, a young woman born with an unexpected, undiagnosed condition that has taken an enormous toll on her body and appearance. Lizzie endured incredible hardships growing up, awkward questions and unpleasant stares from other kids, from strangers on the street, as well as the often-inhuman cruelty that is dealt out in high school. All of this and more, yet Lizzie remains perhaps one of the most amazing, positive and compassionate human beings you’ll ever hope to have a chance to meet.

What is it that makes Lizzie tick? There is a strength we witness in watching A BRAVE HEART that shines like a beacon through all the ugliness and negativity we see in the world. Lizzie is the very best of human nature with pretty much all of the nasty crap cut out. She is just a good, honest, real, sincere, likable person. What Bordo does with the film is to unveil a portrait of what we all can be, what we all should strive to be, but rarely excel to become.

abh_image01

A BRAVE HEART introduces us to Lizzie, intentionally allowing us to dwell on her appearance at first, allowing us to run through our natural human emotions. Bordo allows us to get all the inevitable societal bullsh*t out of our systems before we delve into the heart of Lizzie’s story. We learn a little of her history, we hear the expected stories of growing up as a child that’s different, but the really cool thing that Bordo does is to spend far more time and focus on the positive experiences Lizzie has had growing up. She made friends, participated in extracurricular activities, including cheerleading, and was generally liked by her peers. It seemed, for a while, Lizzie had defeated the grotesque elephant in the room without even having to put up much of a fight… then social media happened.

I am as much a user and supporter of the Internet and social media as the next modern member of society, so I’m not saying it’s inherently bad. However, after seeing A BRAVE HEART, I am much more critical of how some people choose to use this amazing technology and how little use they choose to give their own lives in this world. Lizzie unwittingly discovers that someone has posted a short video clip of her on Youtube with the simple, straightforward title “The Ugliest Woman in the World.” This sup-standard human specimen – one which some would refer to as a “troll” (no, not the kind that lives under a bridge, that I am aware) – has garnered a small level of anonymous cyber-fame by way of shamelessly bullying another human being.

Within what surely seemed like microseconds, Lizzie’s world fell apart. The terribly, vile things being said about her on the Internet by people who do not know her or have ever even met her, going viral and spiraling endlessly into a 7-figure view count, this all came down on Lizzie like ten tons of lead bricks. For most of us, we’d crumble in the wake of the emotional weight, have a nervous breakdown or disappear and isolate ourselves from society altogether. But for Lizzle, this absolutely incredible young woman, it ends up being the key to shedding her inhibitions and triggers her true self to emerge and take control of her life.

abh_image03

Lizzie fights back. Not fire with fire. Not with violence and vengeance. Not with hatred, but with courage and compassion in the face of ignorant malevolence. Instead of hiding or making excuses or succumbing to the ridicule in some other way, Lizzie stands up tall and proud, faces her demons eye to eye – or as much as she can when those demons hide behind the anonymity of the Internet – and she speaks openly and intelligently from her heart, saying this is who I am. My thoughts, beliefs, dreams and desires are what define me, not what I look like. She makes the case that it’s what she chooses to do with her life that matters, and what she does truly matters.

A BRAVE HEART does touch briefly on another case of cyber-bullying that had headlines in the news, but this is ultimately to tie into Lizzie meeting and being a mutual, reciprocal inspiration for the other person. This is Lizzie’s story and she’s going to keep telling it, but not to benefit herself… it’s to benefit others and fulfill what she believes is her life’s calling.

I’ll admit, this review may sound more like a marketing plug than an unbiased critique. I’ll accept that for what it is and counter by stating this; A BRAVE HEART is a modern gem of inspirational documentary filmmaking. It’s a testament to the resilience of the human spirit and a testimony to having faith in the human race where it often seems a lost cause. See this film as adults, share this film with children of all ages, discuss and repeat. Help spread the seed that Lizzie is sowing and by God, help this young woman make a difference in this world.

A BRAVE HEART opens nationwide on Friday, September 25th, 2015

Overall Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

abh_poster

STONEWALL – The Review

Filed under: Review — Tags: , , , , , — Jim Batts @ 10:37 pm

stonewall

Well, we’re past the Summer blockbusters and heading right into the serious, somber cinema season, that time when the studios dream of top ten lists and Oscar gold. What better way to make those award fantasies come true than to hop in the movie “way-back” time machine and witness a most historic birth. But we’re not looking back on the birth of a person, rather the birth of a movement, a concentrated effort to effect change for a minority. Almost a year ago, we saw the civil rights movement take root in the acclaimed SELMA. And in a few weeks, we’ll see the story of  how the women’s equality movement began in SUFFRAGETTE. So, now the movies offer up a look at a true flash point in the struggle of the LGBT community for justice, specifically the 1969 riot at the NYC nightspot called STONEWALL. So, what director is tackling this controversial subject matter. Someone known for daring independent flicks? A firebrand just out of film school? Would you believe the director is a man behind some of the biggest action blockbusters? This tale arrives in cinemas courtesy of Mr. Roland Emmerich. Or should I say Mr. Roland (INDEPENDENCE DAY) Emmerich. Yes, he did make the Shakespeare-era bit of conjecture ANONYMOUS, but this movie really strays from the big epics. Well. lets’ flip the dial back to those “good ol’/bad ol’ days” and discover that peace and love weren’t so easily available to everybody.

The story begins with some stark, black and white images from the film’s later riot sequence accompanied by the layered period factoids concerning the treatment (really mistreatment) of homosexuals (barred from jobs, electro-shock therapy as a “cure”). Then we’re on Christopher Street in the big apple in the Spring of 1969 as eighteen year-old Danny Winters (Jeremy Irvine) arrives fresh off the bus from the midwest. He’s ready to start college classes soon at Columbia, but he needs a place to live. A group of gay street hustlers embrace him, especially the outspoken Ray (Jonny Beauchamp). Through flashbacks we learn that Danny was kicked out of his home by his stern, stoic father after he had been spotted having sex with his football teammate (and dad’s the coach!). Luckily Danny is still in contact with his adoring mother and spitfire kid sister Phoebe (Joey King). Later he’s taken by Ray and his pals to the seedy mob-run bar, the Stonewall Inn, where he attracts the attention of the co-owner Ed Murphy (Ron Perlman) and gay activist Trevor (Jonathon Ryhs Meyers). As Danny is introduced to the world of hooking along with constant police harassment and brutality, he begins a romance with Trevor. Meanwhile ambitious Police Deputy Pine decides to crack down on the Stonewall in order to root out corrupt cops. This comes to a boil on a hot Summer night as the bar’s patrons finally decide that they’ve had enough and become the catalyst for a world-wide fight against oppression and prejudice.

The younger members of the cast strain and sweat trying to push this leaden script, much to their credit. Irvine tries to breathe life into Danny, the bright-eyed audience surrogate. He mainly registers heartbreak and horror as the character becomes a “Perils of Pauline” serial hero escaping doom every other scene as the villains lustily pursue him. His quick adaptation to the big evil city never really rings true, but Irvine truly gives it his all. But his energy level can’t match Beauchamp’s Ray who seems to have been just shot out of a cannon into a pool of coffee (not decaf). Sporting heavy eyeliner, Ray is almost always in a state of panic or disgust as he tosses his feather boa like a bullwhip. King is shaping up to be quite a compelling young actress even as she works to make her stilted, way too adult dialogue believable. As for the screen vets, Rhys Meyers smolders on-screen as the very smooth and slick rabble-rouser and is quite a believable seducer. Perlman is all swarthy menace as the devious and deadly Murphy, seeming like one of Tony Soprano’s most brutal lieutenants. And Craven is convincing as the guy who appears to be the only good cop trying to rescue the kids from the cesspool of the city streets.

Emmerich directs with such passion that the personal intimate stories get steamrolled by the film’s strident message. Yes, yes things weren’t that groovy then, we get it. He’s trying for a gay rights version of SELMA with touches of DO THE RIGHT THING, but the whole story comes off as more clumsy than compelling. Mixing fictional characters with real people and events has worked in films from SAN FRANCISCO to RAGTIME to TITANIC, which made history truly come alive for modern audiences. But when it doesn’t work, the results can be deadly, and the impact of the event can be dulled. Danny’s story never really grabs us, particularly as it plays into many clichés. He’s first approached by a leering, overly made-up queen who seems to have been flown in from a pre-code early “talkie”. Then, much later in the flick, Danny is once again enduring the advances of a much older, husky “sugar daddy” who’s almost a clone of DUNE’s Baron Harkonnen. And his flashback scenes seem to play like Rockwell golden-lit Smallville outtakes from the first Richard Donner Superman flick. But the film is truly slowed down to a halt by the antics of Ray and his group of campy hustlers. On a scale of 1 to 10, their energy and volume always seem to be well past 20. They’re meant to be endearing but are mostly irritating and irresponsible. At one point “Queen Kong” hurls a brick through a window in order to scoop up a flower hat that struck his fancy. Because they’re mistreated, he should take anything he wants? What a rascal! A scamp! For the final scene we get a glimpse of the first parade for gay liberation that spots some truly unconvincing “keyed-in” period backdrops. This after a riot sequence that feels flat and squeezed in to fit onto a soundstaged Christopher street corner. There’s a good lesson to be learned from this cultural event, but good intentions don’t always inspire good movies. And the incredibly stilted, heavy-handed, maudlin STONEWALL proves it.

1.5 Out of 5

STONEWALL opens everywhere and screens exclusively in the St. Louis area at Landmark’s Tivoli theatre

stonewallposter

 

 

 

 

September 17, 2015

BLACK MASS – The Review

1E189D3F

Hit the deck! Rat-a-tat-tat!! These are the sounds of a cinema staple, the gangster genre. From the early silent days, “thugs with dirty mugs” were the source of many a “hit” at the box office, of course. Soon after the Brothers Warner began their studio, they quickly became the premiere producers of these “blood and thunder” morality plays, featuring a “murderers’ row” of movie icons headed by James Cagney, Edward G Robertson, and Humphrey Bogart. In the waning years of Hollywood’s Golden Age, these thrillers often merged with the biography genre with the stories of real-life 20’s and 30’s criminals like John Dillinger, Bonnie Parker, and Clyde Barrow, and, the big man himself, “Scarface” Al Capone. With the phenomenal success of THE GODFATHER, these “public enemies” were back in vogue, continuing even to this day. Now the Warners are back in the true tale gangster biz, but they’re not offering up a new spin on those tommy-gun toting terrors. Here’s a crime kingpin from a much more recent era who’s actually still around. Now, this isn’t a look at his rise and fall. Rather it’s the tale of an unlikely alliance between this brutal underworld czar and a “G-Man”! Suit up for a truly pitch-dark BLACK MASS.

As the film opens, we’re in an interrogation room, as the “lieutenant” of Boston’s infamous “Winter Hill Gang”, Kevin Weeks (Jesse Plemons) talks about his boss, the crime ruler of the Irish south side, James “Whitey” Bulger (Johnny Depp). We then flashback to FBI agent John Connolly (Joel Edgerton) who has returned to his hometown in 1975, along with his bride Marianne (Julianne Nicholson), and is now part of the bureau’s Boston HQ. The local agents are frustrated with their lack of progress in stopping the illegal activities of the Italian mob to the north and Whitey’s south stronghold. Then John gets an idea. He grew up in the same neighborhood as the Bulgers, why not reach out to state Senate politico Billy Bulger (Benedict Cumberbatch) and see if he can put him in contact with Whitey, so that he can recruit him as an informant on his Italian rivals (in exchange, the feds would look the other way on Whitey’s petty crimes). John’s supervisor Charles McGuire (Kevin Bacon) is skeptical, but another agent, John Morris (David Harbour) is supportive. Billy Bulger is insulted by John, but to his shock, Whitey calls the agent. So, an agreement is forged. As long as Whitey supplies the info and steers clear of felonies (particularly murder), the FBI will ease up on his operations. But the hair-trigger Whitey is not so easily restrained, and soon he’s setting up shop in Miami, while providing guns and cash to the IRA. As he and John become a close team (and the agent become a rising star at the bureau), a new prosecutor, Fred Wyshak (Corey Stoll) questions this “relationship”. Can he possibly reign in Whitey’s gang , who’s now protected by the ambitious Connolly?

Whitey-United-States-of-America-v-James-J-Bulger-2014-6

The real James “Whitey” Bulger

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The film’s main selling point is Depp as the almost reptilian mob boss, Whitey, and he most certainly delivers. After more than a decade of maximum quirk as the MVP of Tim Burton and Gore Verbinski flicks, he’s tossed the eyeliner and eccentric duds and nails the complexity of this real life monster mobster. He can be sweet and charming as in the scenes with his sainted mother and adored young son. But then, almost without warning, a switch is flipped and the killer is freed from its shackles. With his hair slicked back to a bullet-like sheen, Depp evokes the image of a human cobra, one that gives no hiss as a warning. On the contrary, he takes great giddy pleasure from lulling his prey into relaxed calm, even shaking their hands, before the out-of-nowhere death strike. With a performance recalling Cagney classics (THE PUBIC ENEMY and WHITE HEAT), it’s nice to see Deep back on earth after so many years in on the planet of the weird. While his image adorns the ads and posters, the film is really the story of the seduction and corruption of Connolly ,and Edgerton, coming off his excellent work on THE GIFT, shows us the ambitious longing in the compromised lawman. He will truly bargain with the devil himself in order to advance his career and get to that next level with the grander title and the bigger office. Later we see the desperation in his eyes as Connolly frantically tries to talk himself out of the deep, deep hole that he has dug, one that traps him as its walls collapse about his feet.

Actually the entire cast is stellar as they support these two very compelling leads. Nicholson as Mrs. Connolly presents a woman quickly falling out of love, with a real sense of disgust as she realizes that her husband shares their emotional bed with a creature of pure evil (a creepy confrontation with Whitey is quite unnerving). Harbor is enthralling as Connolly’s cheerleader/sidekick who slowly learns that he’s very much out of his depth. Bacon is an entertaining hardcase as the big FBI boss, but the terrific Adam Scott has little to do besides modeling tacky 70’s fashions and hairstyles, unfortunately. Stoll proves to be a most capable verbal sparring partner for Edgerton. From his introduction, we sense that he’s a legal pit bull. Cumberbatch tempers his small screen charisma and gives us an original take on an “old school” career politician, one with fierce family pride. He can’t turn his back on his family, especially his brother, no matter the horror tales told behind his back. Peter Sarsgaard shines in a terrific small role as a “coked up” Miami wheeler-dealer nicknamed “Balloonhead”. Plemons and W. Earl Brown are very convincing as two of Whitey’s most trusted enforcers, both morphing into dead-eyed real human terminators, while their cohort Rory Cochrane lets his sadness escape through the eyes of his bulldog-like mug. He lets us see how the humiliation and degradation meted out by his boss has taken its toil on him. That “50 Shades” lady, Dakota Johnson brings out the human side of Whitey in her soft, subtle turn as his common-in-law wife Lindsey Cyr. Great cameo turns by Bill Camp and Juno Temple round out this impressive ensemble.

In his third outing as a director (CRAZY HEART, OUT OF THE FURNACE) former actor Scott Cooper fights a difficult battle to keep this long, meandering screenplay moving forward. Unfortunately it usually gets the better of him, despite his considerable efforts. Although it mainly focuses in on a ten-year period going from the disco 70’s to the grim and gritty 80’s, the script quickly becomes an illustrated rap sheet, checking off a list of crimes (then he did this, then this, then…). There are a few moments between murders where the characters rather than the blood-splattered set pieces take command. One such sequence is the very tense BBQ dinner at the Connolly home, going right from a recipe inquiry (probably too similar to Joe Pesci’s iconic “How am I funny?” monologue, but still strong) to the threat-laced passive-aggressive duet between Whitey and Marianne (just watch the other audience members squirm during this). Bulger supposedly was the inspiration for Jack Nicholson’s “Paddy” Costello character in Martin Scorsese’s THE DEPARTED. Ultimately this new film is swallowed up in the shadow of that Oscar winner, and especially by the even earlier GOODFELLAS (Depp often seems to be doing a mash-up of its DeNiro and Pesci characters). This is a shame, since the movie gets the period look, from autos to fashions, down perfectly and the  Boston location work is exceptional. Perhaps another script draft, or a bit more narration would have helped keep things moving. At least the film reminds us of what a terrific actor Depp can be when given challenging material. But really all the actors are superb, it’s just truly frustrating that the narrative fumbles what should be a cinema touchdown. BLACK MASS, like the law man’s plan at its center, is a flawed attempt at greatness.

3.5 Out of 5

blackmassposter

 

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress