LIFE WITH MUSIC – Review

Okay cinema, you’ve been taunting us with films concerning things we can’t enjoy because of the pandemic (aside from actually seeing flicks in our favorite chain multiplex, although a smattering have reopened mostly with older movies). A couple of days ago it was renting an online getaway home, before that, it was road trips and movies set in faraway lands. Now, it’s the concert experience. This somewhat new release isn’t about a touring rock n’ roll band or a hard-partying country crooner (they’ve been doing a variation of the movies’ solution with drive-in concerts and simulcasts). We’re entering the world of classical music, with a profile of a celebrated pianist, so an indoor venue, a hall or auditorium, is preferred for the acoustics and intimacy. Oh, playing the “keyboard virtuoso’ is an actor that garnered lots of press and praise earlier this year for returning to the role that made him world-famous several decades ago. But he still wants to show us his versatility as a man who struggles to combine LIFE WITH MUSIC.

At the start of this story, we’re sitting right on the bench in a packed concert hall next to world-famous classical pianist Henry Cole (Patrick Stewart). The audience is in awe, but Henry is suffering for his art. Concluding his complex final piece, he bolts from the stage and heads out the stage door into the alley. As Henry doffs his jacket and loosens his tie, the door flings open to reveal his agent/manager Paul (Giancarlo Esposito). It’s the start of Henry’s comeback/final tour after he took time out to mourn the death of his wife, and Paul reminds him that he “owes” the audience an encore number. But this unexpected panic attack precludes that. Still, Henry has to “meet the press” who grill him over the lack of an encore. As Henry fumbles for an answer, he notices a late arrival, New Yorker music critic Helen Morrison (Katie Holmes). As the reporters drift away, she timidly inquires about a further interview, part of a profile for the magazine. He declines but later finds that her words occupy his thoughts. To his surprise, she shows up at his appearance days later at Steinway Hall. When his “performance panic’ kicks in, she joins him at the piano for an impromptu duet. Helen proves to be a calming influence, so he happily agrees to the interview. At another concert, Henry is overwhelmed and refuses to resume after the intermission. A frazzled Paul is ecstatic to see Helen who talks Henry “down”. The two then become inseparable as she joins him on the road and at his home in the forests of upper New York state. After some “downtime” Henry decides to continue with his farewell tour which will conclude with a highly publicized London concert, set to be live-streamed around the globe. But will tragedy prevent Henry from taking that final bow?

The film is carried by the “out of the box” casting of Stewart as Henry. Whether he’s leading Starfleet officers or mutants into battle, the actor effortlessly projects strength and confidence, even as he reads Shakespeare sonnets on the internet. This role demands that he show a more timid, vulnerable side, one we’ve not really seen since his acclaimed (perhaps) final turn as Xavier in LOGAN. As he views the music notes on a page of sheet music they seem to smother him, his panic is palpable as we can almost smell the “flop-sweat”. Henry’s certainly emotionally wounded but we also see him begin to heal, his grimace slowly cracks into a grin. This leads to the revealing of his gentle nature, as when Henry shares his gifts with a young fan. Stewart draws us in with his commanding presence and serene vocal style. This helps bring out a subtle, restrained performance by Holmes who’s most believable as the soothing balm to Henry’s ills. She may be the “good cop” to Esposito’s, well maybe not bad cop, but definitely a taskmaster. He deftly ” keeps lots of plates spinning” as he gently nudges Henry out of his ‘comfort zone’, believing in his talents, but trying to satisfy and placate all the forces dependent on “the talent”. He truly cares about Henry, as we see his mind scrambling to say the right words and encouragement to bring a great career to a spectacular finale.

First-time feature director Claude Lalonde keeps the story from screenwriter Louis Godbout flowing at a leisurely pace, giving us a real insider’s view of the classical music concert world. They both deal with the tale’s unconventional romance, namely the “age thing”, with restraint (after Henry expresses his concerns, Helen replies, “You got a thing against young people?”) and the complex friendship/ business partnership between Henry and Paul. Unfortunately, though, much of the Henry/Helen scenes consist of long walking montages with voiceovers of her spouting “touch-feely” platitudes. Speaking of, the characters, particularly Henry, spend long swathes of the running time strolling, watching other pedestrians, and staring at their surroundings. Some of which are lovely though, especially a side trip to Sils-Maria in the Swiss Alps. Ultimately those scenes are confusing as we realize that the story is doing “fast-forward” time- jumps with little purpose. The momentum of the plot is thrown off, much as with the many close-ups of Helen looking at Henry with bright-eyed, smiling admiration. Fans of the classic composers and of the superb Stewart will find much to enjoy, but LIFE WITH MUSIC wrecks its tempo when away from the keyboard.


2 out of 4

LIFE WITH MUSIC is available as a Digital Download on most streaming platforms and apps such as iTunes, Amazon, and Google.

CHARLIE’S ANGELS (2019) – Review

This week’s big new studio flick actually feels like a holdover from the Summer, with its big splashy action sequences and loopy, loose attitude (not at all one of the somber end of the year bits of serious cinema). Oh, as for the “new” part, this one’s roots are pretty old, well over 45 years. It could be called a reboot of a reboot, all going back to an iconic TV show that ran from 1976 to 1981. This hour-long camp caper fantasy was in rerun limbo until a star-packed feature film upgrade hit the screens in 2000, with a sequel three years later. But unlike other TV shows turned film franchises like STAR TREK and MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE, which just keep “chuggin’ along”, it pretty much stalled out, aside from an 8 episode TV series (hmmm from the tube to the movies twice then back) in 2011. Now, just a few weeks since the return of THE ADDAMS FAMILY comes another TV rehash with a twist. With the earlier flick, it’s “new spin” was CG animation., while this weekend’s ‘spin’ is mainly behind the camera. So, was there really a fervent clamoring for this return? Maybe audiences are ready for the 2019 edition of CHARLIE’S ANGELS.

As with the MI and Bond films, this romp begins with the end of an adventure. In Rio, an international criminal and his crew are taken down. Rather than a secret government unit, the heroes are the “angels” of the Charlie Townsend Agency including the street-smart, snarky Sabina (Kristen Stewart) and deadly former MI-6 agent Jane (Ella Balinska), all supervised by their handler “Bosley” (Patrick Stewart). A year or so later, at the office of the Brock Company in Hamburg, Germany, systems engineer Elena Houghlin (Naomi Scott) informs her supervisor Mr. Fleming (Nat Faxon) of the possible dangers of their revolutionary portable power device the Calisto (it looks like a Buckminister Fuller designed Tesseract) after the device puts an associate in the hospital. He dismisses her concerns, prompting Elena to find a way to get the word to Brock (Sam Claflin) himself. Meanwhile, at the LA home of CTA, Bosley is given a retirement party by Bosley (Elizabeth Banks). Confused? Well, it seems that “Bosley” is like a rank in the military, similar to captain. As the celebration ends, Sabina and Jane reteam for their new assignment. Elena has contacted the CTA about her concerns, but her secret meeting with another Bosley and the two angels ends in tragedy because of an attack by a deadly assassin. The scientist joins the angels when all the Calisto devices go missing (along with Fleming). Turns out that they can be weaponized. Thus begins a globe-trotting race against time to recover the devices before they end up in the wrong hands.

Of the three actresses playing the title characters the best known is probably Stewart as the senior angel known as Sabina (a sly nod to original TV angel Sabrina played by Kate Jackson). Freed from the forbidden romance of the TWILIGHT franchise and her recent fairly somber “indie” work, Stewart seems to be the person having the most fun in this frivolous bit of fluff. Particularly in the opening sequence as she dons a long platinum wig to vamp the baddies reminding me of a certain Oscar-winning “wabbit” whose drag diva deceptions always fooled his enemy (Wayne and Garth were right about that “excellent” observation). Perhaps this could lead to many more daffy comic roles. Scott as Elena is also a source of many comic moments as the “novice”, who’s stunned and often overwhelmed in this “super-spy” skewed world. Although she shrieks in panic as a thug lunges for her, she’s able to use her scientific smarts to gain the upper hand on most of the goons. The relative newcomer (at least for moviegoers) is the towering bronze amazon (hmm, maybe she could be a “sister” of Diana’s gone rogue in another franchise) Balinska as the no-nonsense Jane. She easily goes from action queen to strutting runway royalty with equal confidence. Speaking of confidence, their main Bosley, as played by the talented Ms.Banks, is a tough taskmaster, though this delicious den mother enjoys getting in on the jokes and the chases. The other Bosley is played with “old school” cool by Mr. Stewart (no relation to Kristen), who appears to relish a break from the mutants and starships. As for the main adversaries, Faxon makes a superb smirking pig (“You oughtta’ smile more”) as Elena’s jerk of a boss, while Claflin, as his boss Brock, is very funny as he finds out the brutal realities of dealing with the “dark side”. And some real menace is provided by Jonathon Tucker, whose Hodak is a relentless robot-like destructive force.

You recall when I said that the new “spin” was behind the camera? Well, this studio action “tent pole” is directed by a woman, the aforementioned main Bosley, Banks. And that’s not all because she wrote the screenplay from the story by Evan Spiliotopoulis and Davis Auburn. She guides the chases and stunts with great energy and skill while eliciting a great comedic performance from Ms. Stewart. Unfortunately, the film flounders when the angels aren’t defying danger and outwitting those lunkheaded lads who underestimate them. Particularly during the “pit stops” as the ladies grab the gadgets (could “Q” be moonlighting) and sop up the exposition, the story comes to a screeching halt. Plus several scenes remind us of better films. The Angels don matching outfits and Tony Tenille blonde wigs to confuse a security team, much as in the remake of THE THOMAS CROWN AFFAIR, but without a real “pay off”. Ditto the “phone switching” right out of the OCEANS caper “playbook”.And did we really need the “young girls following their dreams” montage for the opening titles (using Benington ad-like outakes)? The same goes for the ridiculous “techno-pop” dance number that adds nothing to the big third act “showdown”. Those camp (some unintended) moments just prove that the angels seem silly and quaint after the gritty thrills of ATOMIC BLONDE and RED SPARROW. Sure some of the winks at their TV and film pasts are cheesy fun (the quick bits during the end credits capture the spirit), but we’re left with the fact that CHARLIE’S ANGELS never soar. They barely get off the ground (cue the harps).


1 Out of 4

THE KID WHO WOULD BE KING – Review

This week the multiplex presents another retelling of a familiar, romantic legend. You may be wondering whether we’re going to endure another revival of ROBIN HOOD since the stench of that abomination from two months ago has finally cleared from theatres (last week it garnered several well-earned Razzie nominations). No we’re not going to that exact time frame, for this new film starts a bit before, then jumps (leaps and bounds really) to the present day. It’s somehow a reboot and retelling of the story of Arthur, complete with knights, wizards, dragons, and that magical sword Excalibur, of course. And this time it’s a lad of thirteen or fourteen years, Alex, who is THE KID WHO WOULD BE KING.

This adventure starts with some backstory, namely a spiffy animated prologue rendered in the style of old pen and ink illustrations which whittles down the Arthurian legend to the basics, ending with the banishment of sorcerous Morgan Le Fey AKA Morgana to the underworld (dragged down literally by slithering tree roots). Freeze frame of Arthur and his aides on (how about that) the cover of a children’s storybook. Speaking of kids, we then meet the hero Alex (Louis Ashbourne Serkis) as his single Mum (Dad’s long gone) sends him off to a posh private school. But before class, he’s got to rescue his BFF Bedders (Dean Chaumoo) from two taller, older bullying students, Kaye (Rhianna Dorris) and Lance (Tom Taylor). No good deed goes unpunished, so that night, the devilish duo chase Alex through a park. Ducking into a housing construction site, he finds a sword sticking out of a concrete block. Alex easily plucks it out and heads home. He doesn’t see that this action has caused a stirring far beneath London. Morgana (Rebecca Ferguson) is awake, and as she tries to free herself of the restraining tree roots, she commands her army of brimstone-infused undead warriors. At dawn, miles away, a naked young man emerges from the mist. It is Merlin (Angus Imrie) who casts a spell on a patrol car and hitches a ride into London. At the school, he finds Alex and tells him that during the days-away solar eclipse, Morgana and her army will rise from the Earth and enslave humanity. Can Alex train and prepare along with his “knights” (Bedders and their two enemies, now united) in time to destroy Morgana in her underworld lair before the sun is blotted out, maybe for good?

Alex, the title “kid”, is played with vigor, determination, and just the right touch of vulnerability by the talented Serkis (yes he’s “mo-cap master” Andy’s son). He deftly balances the leadership qualities for the “one and future” along with some apprehension and sadness, particularly when he learns the truth about his father during this “hero’s journey”. Serkis is the story’s sturdy foundation, while its manic zany energy comes from the comedic charms of Imrie who appears to have a blast as the immortal wizard (it’s explained that he’s got the Benjamin Button aging backward bug), It’s a testament to his acting chops that he’s just as entertaining as his aged “true self” played by Sir Patrick Stewart, who pops up a few times to add some gravitas and keeps the kiddos “on point”. Luckily his heroic character is as compelling as the tale’s villain (really villainess) played with silky, slithery bad girl glee by Ferguson, who’s just as menacing in her sultry human form as she is in her flying, fire-breathing “upgrade”. But there’s also terrific comedy relief from Chaumoo as the jittery beleaguered Bedders. He and Serkis are inspired counterparts to the story’s early antagonists portrayed with dead-eyed cruelty by Dorris and Taylor. While Alex and Bedders must find their inner courage, these two have the more complex arc as they must find their long-repressed empathy and humanity. There’s also great supporting work by Denise Gough as Alex’s confused, but still sympathetic and nurturing mother.

With his first feature film since 2011’s (!) ATTACK THE BLOCK, director/writer Joe Cornish ably upgrades the ancient fables and legends by injecting the rollicking energy of the classic movie “kid clubs” (going back to “Our Gang” and especially the 1980s cable TV movie staples like THE GOONIES, THE EXPLORERS, and even THE MONSTER SQUAD). This pays off well in the slapstick and special effects finale that unites a whole school against nearly unstoppable odds. Smartly Cornish hangs on to his PG rating by not making the forces of evil too horrific, though the charred demons on horseback bursting through the grass and Earth could elicit nightmares in the youngest viewers (the warriors seem to have lava flowing through their veins), while older film fans might recall the creations of effects genius Ray Harryhausen in his Sinbad series and especially in JASON AND THE ARGONAUTS (the children of the Hydra). But the scary stuff is offset with some great bits of humor and whimsy, usually from Imrie’s rubbery spell-casting hand movements (I expect kids will be imitating them in the lobby and during the ride home). And though this clocks in at two hours, Cornish keeps the pace brisk while also offering good lessons on duty, honor, and courage. Kids of all ages should engage and identify with THE KID WHO WOULD BE KING.

3.5 Out of 5

The New Character Posters And Trailer For THE KID WHO WOULD BE KING Are Here – Stars Rebecca Ferguson And Patrick Stewart

Later this month, the legend comes to life like never before.

20th Century Fox has released the new trailer for THE KID WHO WOULD BE KING. The film is written and directed by Joe Cornish and stars Louis Ashbourne Serkis, Dean Chaumoo, Tom Taylor, Rhianna Dorris, Angus Imrie, with Rebecca Ferguson and Patrick Stewart.

Old school magic meets the modern world in the epic adventure THE KID WHO WOULD BE KING. Alex (Ashbourne Serkis) thinks he’s just another nobody, until he stumbles upon the mythical Sword in the Stone, Excalibur. Now, he must unite his friends and enemies into a band of knights and, together with the legendary wizard Merlin (Stewart), take on the wicked enchantress Morgana (Ferguson). With the future at stake, Alex must become the great leader he never dreamed he could be.

The film hits theaters January 25.

Patrick Stewart and Louis Ashbourne Serkis in Twentieth Century Fox’s THE KID WHO WOULD BE KING. Photo Credit: Kerry Brown.

OFFICIAL WEBSITE: www.TheKidWhoWouldBeKing.com

THE WILDE WEDDING – Review

 

With the big end of the year holidays still a couple of weeks away, what kind of big event can gather a big family (or a diverse acting ensemble)? It’s gotta’ be a comedy so a funeral is probably out of the question, although both the British and US versions of DEATH AT A FUNERAL are pretty darned hilarious. No, there’s got to be a romantic angle, so the setting should probably be a wedding. Film makers have used them for lots of comedies that are ripe with conflict from all the versions of FATHER OF THE BRIDE to those big cast showcases like Robert Altman’s A WEDDING and the big, big superstar-studded , appropriately named THE BIG WEDDING just three years ago. And like that flick, some of the exes are involved, upping the tension and making for THE WILDE WEDDING that lives up to its name (spelling explained shortly).

 

Laying out the clustered family tree is teenage film maker Mackenzie (Grace Van Patten), who, conveniently for the audience, is making a documentary of the event for her grandmother (don’t call her that), celebrated film actress Eve Wilde (Glenn Close). Mackenzie is the daughter of one of three sons that Eve had with her first husband, stage icon Lawrence Darling (John Malkovich). Eve is about to tie the knot with her fourth husband, renown British author Harold (Patrick Stewart). He’s not big on show biz, so his two twenty-something daughters quiz him on Eve’s career during the trip to the swanky wooded estate where the ceremony will take place. Mackenzie’s uncles are the bumbling single dad Jimmy (Noah Emmerich) and actor/ladies man Ethan (Peter Facinelli). She lives her father Rory (Jack Davenport), a semi-retired songwriter/musician who was part of a rock band headlined by ex-wife (and Mack’s mum) Priscilla (Minnie Driver), who kept the band. She’s remarried and has a pre-teen son named Sam. Oh, and did I mention that Mackenzie pines for her cousin, Eve’s nephew, Dylan (Tim Boardman). But with an ex-wife and an ex-husband in attendance, that’s the least of the scandals and forbidden hook-ups that will occur during the wedding eve. But if everything went smoothly…well. where’s the fun in that?

 

 

For classic film fans, this isn’t quite the DANGEROUS LIAISONS reunion they may have been waiting for over the past (nearly) thirty years. Close is radiant as the former screen queen (certainly more content and, er, stable than her former stage role of Norma Desmond), but she has little to do other than gaze longingly at her former and future mates. We hear of her other adored movie roles, but other than a soliloquy to the bathroom mirror, there’s just talk. Malkovich gets a nice reprieve from the usual oddballs (the RED flicks) as a guy who’s more grounded, but will go into a theatrical gesture with little prompting (usually as he recounts another stage award). Stewart, sporting a ridiculous permed wig, is amusing as a stuffy, pompous jerk, maybe a refined version of the rom-com “Baxter” cliché’, but he’s mostly baffled and befuddled. As for the grown sibs and spouses, Driver gets to indulge in some campy diva behavior as the preening rocker that over-indulges in every excess. Of the three grown sons, Davenport projects an easy-going everyman vibe, as a fella’ who doesn’t need the spotlight any longer. The other actors don’t fare as well. Emmerich is a clumsy boob who moons over a bus driver (their eyes meet for a split-second, so he’s on the phone with her transit company), while squawking “get a ‘pre-nup'” to his mum. Facinelli is the “player” whose “bad boy” persona (oooo, he’s got a motorcycle, oh with a sidecar for his pooch…awww) is catnip to several of the ladies.

 

It’s still an impressive cast, but writer/director Damian Harris has shackled them with a story that’s calculated to hit every “sitcom-like” beat. While he’s aiming for charm, the result is more “smarm” with scenes teetering on edge of cloying and precious (let’s dance on the dining table, everyone). The opulent mansion and the surrounding woods and beach look lovely as gallons of wine are guzzled and a tin of naughty naughty chocolates are passed around (what’s that special spice). The film lurches along until the big reveal prompts an ending that would have seemed implausible and trite fifty years ago (really,everybody should have known better). And of course, two of the young lovers must leap, fully clothed, in the swimming pool near the finale’. It’s rather symbolic because despite this impeccable ensemble, THE WILDE WEDDING is all wet.

1.5 out of 5

 

Watch The New Trailer For THE WILDE WEDDING Starring Glenn Close, Patrick Stewart And John Malkovich

Starring together in Stephen Frears’ 1988 drama DANGEROUS LIAISONS, John Malkovich and Glenn Close reunite in the upcoming movie THE WILDE WEDDING.

Here’s a brand new look at the movie.

In THE WILDE WEDDING, now-retired film star Eve Wilde (Glenn Close) prepares for her wedding to husband number four, renowned English writer Harold Alcott (Patrick Stewart) after a whirlwind courtship.

At her upstate New York home – in the presence of both Wilde’s first husband, celebrated stage actor Laurence Darling (John Malkovich), and their collective families (Minnie Driver, Jack Davenport, Yael Stone, Peter Facinelli, Noah Emmerich, Grace Van Patten) – the long summer weekend offers the opportunity for everyone to get to know each other a bit more intimately.

As sexual sparks begin to fly, there are unforeseen consequences abound.

Directed by Damian Harris, the film will hit theaters September 15th from Vertical Entertainment.

Visit it on Facebook: www.facebook.com/vert-ent

LOGAN – Review

Photo Credit: Ben Rothstein.© 2017 Marvel. TM and © 2017 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation.

One of the reasons why many fall in love with comic books is because they have a history of focusing on people treated like outsiders. They tell stories about individuals who feel different – men and women simply trying to live a normal life while dealing with an intolerant world. With many of the superhero film adaptations, the approach to telling these stories has been wrong. You usually watch a superhero character that also has human characteristics… not the other way around. The focus is on the “super” difference, not on the idea that humanity is actually comprised of individuals with differences (some big, some small). It’s interesting how most superhero film adaptations get this confused.

LOGAN successfully corrects this by weaving humanity through the title character’s adamantium body. Wolverine has the unique power to miraculously heal himself within seconds. But now as an old man, Wolverine is less like the self-healing ferocious and agile beast he once was. He’s more like a man; a man made of flesh and blood and filled with pain and torment. You can see the sadness in his eyes. You can see the impact it has taken on his body. He resembles less of the superhero we’re used to seeing and more of the man he’s always been deep down.

James Mangold has delivered an X-Men film unlike any that has come before it. After the initial shock of hearing the character use the f-word on screen followed by the limb severing visceral violence, what will hit the hardest for fans is witnessing Mangold slice open and get to the emotional core of this beloved character we have watched evolve for now eight films (nine if you count a brief cameo). LOGAN is a poetic journey that is about unexpectedly finding new life after giving up on cheating death.

When Hugh Jackman announced he would be hanging up the claws for good with this depiction of “Old Man Logan,” there was excitement among fans for this direction but also an air of melancholy surrounding the project. While Mangold might not have done right by fans with his previous Wolverine solo outing, LOGAN delivers the excitement and emotion that fans anticipated. It’s a film that’s focused on the characters and their journeys without feeling the need to connect to an extended universe. Sure, there are nods for fans, but it’s not in the service to those callbacks or an overarching story.

 

The character that many fans will recognize and will quickly love is X-23 (though called Laura in the film). Played with ferocious conviction by Dafne Keen, the young character comes into the life of Logan at the wrong moment. Logan is having troubles of his own dealing with both his own health and that of the mentally ill Professor Xavier (once again, the phenomenal Patrick Stewart). The three head out on an unorthodox road trip of sorts after a group of mercenaries attempt to capture Laura.

Following in the footsteps of such classic pairings as the gunfighter and his son in EL TOPO and the LONE WOLF AND CUB series, LOGAN positions the character having to play father to a new young one while serving as a son and caretaker for his dying mentor. The struggles of this situation and the duo roles he must tackle becomes the centerpiece of the film. Cinematographer John Mathieson chooses to accentuate these relationships with tight camera shots, focusing in on the facial features and contemplative looks. Some of the camerawork is a little too close and intimate. Given the wide dusty landscape, Mathieson could’ve taken a note or two from John Ford and opened up the lens just a little bit more at times.

However, that’s a minor complaint in a film that tells such a beautifully rich and fulfilling story. Although it most likely won’t see the award attention it deserves, Hugh Jackman pours everything he has into his swan song. It’s a brutal film, both physically and emotionally. Mangold has given Jackman fans a fond farewell, capped off with a closing shot that might be one of the most powerful images in the X-Men franchise.

In 2000, Bryan Singer ushered in a new era of the superhero film with X-MEN. It gave birth to the cinematic version of Wolverine. The character has served as a father figure to Rogue and others over the course of several films, but never has the idea been explored as explicitly as it is in LOGAN. Mangold shows us that children are thrown into this world. Adults are sometimes thrown into the role of parents. But it’s through unforeseen circumstances that you can find a new meaning to your life. You discover that differences can be a uniting force, and how that can be a theme we learn from when the focus isn’t on the capes but the people wearing them.

 

Overall rating: 4.5 out of 5

LOGAN is now playing in theaters everywhere

logan-dom-107140_A_1Sht_rated_rgb

 

Hugh Jackman Stars In First Clip From James Mangold’s LOGAN

logan-dom-107140_A_1Sht_rated_rgb

20th Century Fox has released the first clip for LOGAN.

In the near future, a weary Logan’s (Hugh Jackman) attempts to hide from the world and his legacy are up-ended when a young mutant arrives, being pursued by dark forces. Check out the first clip below.

In case you missed Sunday’s epic SuperBowl, watch the big game TV spot.

The movie also stars Patrick Stewart, Richard E. Grant, Boyd Holbrook, Stephen Merchant, introducing Dafne Keen.

LOGAN hits theaters everywhere on March 3, 2017.

Check out the official site: http://www.foxmovies.com/movies/logan

Photo Credit: Ben Rothstein.© 2017 Marvel. TM and © 2017 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation.
Photo Credit: Ben Rothstein.© 2017 Marvel. TM and © 2017 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation.

Hugh Jackman Is LOGAN In Latest Video

Photo Credit: Ben Rothstein.
Photo Credit: Ben Rothstein.

Watch the final trailer director James Mangold’s LOGAN.

In the near future, a weary Logan cares for an ailing Professor X in a hide out on the Mexican border. But Logan’s attempts to hide from the world and his legacy are up-ended when a young mutant arrives, being pursued by dark forces.

Starring Hugh Jackman, Patrick Stewart, Richard E. Grant, Boyd Holbrook, Stephen Merchant, and Dafne Keen, 20th Century will unleash LOGAN into cinemas on March 3, 2017.

http://www.foxmovies.com/movies/logan

Photo Credit: Ben Rothstein.
Photo Credit: Ben Rothstein.

© 2017 Marvel. TM and © 2017 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation.

Photo Credit: James Mangold.
Photo Credit: James Mangold

logan-dom-Logan_SunsetVerB_Revised_sRGB_rgb

LOGAN – Hugh Jackman as Wolverine First Trailer Released

logan
Hugh Jackman is back as  Wolverine in LOGAN!

LOGAN hits theaters everywhere on March 3, 2017! Check out the new trailer:

Set in the future of 2024, Logan and Professor Charles Xavier must cope with the loss of the X-Men when a corporation lead by Nathaniel Essex is destroying the world leaving it to destruction, with Logan’s healing abilities slowly fading away and Xavier’s Alzheimer’s forcing him to forget. Logan must defeat Nathaniel Essex with the help of a young girl named Laura Kinney, a female clone of Wolverine. LOGAN stars Hugh Jackman, Patrick Stewart, Richard E. Grant, Boyd Holbrook, Stephen Merchant, and Dafne Keen.

logan2