DEAD MAN’S WIRE – Review

Dacre Montgomery as Richard and Bill Skarsgard as Tony, in Gus Van Sant’s DEAD MAN’S WIRE. Courtesy of Row K Entertainment

It has been seven years since we saw a film from Gus Van Sant but the director comes back strong with DEAD MAN’S WIRE, an impressive crime thriller/drama based on a bizarre real hostage incident in late 1970s Indianapolis. In 1977, an aspiring businessman, Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgard), who felt cheated by his mortgage lender, took the company’s manager hostage, by attaching a shotgun to his neck with a looped wire, while the gun’s trigger was wired to the kidnapper’s body, so that if a sniper killed the kidnapper, the hostage would die too. The method has since called a dead man’s wire. Gus Van Sant uses this real event to craft a tense, thriller film, laced with a dark humor that built on the absurdity of the situation, but also human drama that touches on issues of despair and desperation, economic unfairness, and shady business dealings. DEAD MAN’S WIRE is a technically impressive film as well as working as both a gripping entertainment thriller and commentary on slanted economic system.

Much of this crazy real event was captured on film by news camera, which was shot continuously during the 63 hour standoff with the kidnapper. The engrossing historic thriller is given an authenticity by director Gus Van Sant who captures the feel of 1977, by carefully reproducing the 1970s styles and visual aesthetics of the time period, and most strikingly by recreating the look of TV news and shows of the era, in this film. The visuals so closely match the actual archival footage of the real event, snippets of which Van Sant inserts into his film. The event took place during a transitional moment in how news is covered, and the event is still taught in schools of journalism as an example of news reporting crossing a line to escalate a situation. It adds an eerie level to this already atmospheric, darkly comic thriller/drama.

The film does not condone the kidnapper’s actions but Bill Skarsgard’s masterful performance gives us insights on someone driven to the edge, after being taken advantage of by his unscrupulous, wealthy lender. Austin Kolodney’s script speaks to “Everyman” issues of economic inequality and an unfair system skewed to favor the already rich, a topic that particularly resonates today. There are echoes of DOG DAY AFTERNOON in this film, as well as other “little guy” against the system tales, of someone driven over the edge by circumstances. While DEAD MAN’S WIRE is based on a true story, the drama/thriller goes in unexpected directions, and leans into its dark, absurdist humor at times.

Bill Skarsgard gives a striking performance as the odd, even unbalanced Tony Kiritsis, a would-be real estate entrepreneur who relishes the spotlight, which is part of why this film is so involving.

Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgard) has reached a desperate state with a mortgage he took out from local lender Meridian Mortgage. The mortgage was not for a home, but a business investment in real estate, property Tony Kiritsis hopes to develop as the location for a shopping mall. Tony had lined up plenty of would-be business tenants but he is puzzled as they fade away and he has trouble securing businesses to lease space. Without those funds, he falls behind on payments, and Tony has grown increasingly frustrated in trying to deal with his lender. When Meridian Mortage’s owner M. L. Hall (Al Pacino) offers to buy the property – for far less than Tony paid – Tony begins to suspect it is his own lender who is re-directing would-be leasers to other sites, sabotaging Tony’s business plan.

Tony’s anger and desperation leads to his plan with the dead man’s wire. The original target was Meridian’s M. L. Hall but instead, Tony ends up taking Hall’s son Richard, who also works for Meridian, hostage. Since this is based on a real event, that is not much of a spoiler, as the real big question is what happens next.

The police are alerted and are almost immediately on the scene, but there is little they can do, with Tony’s “dead man’s wire” shotgun apparatus pointed at Richard Hall’s head and the trigger wired to be pulled if Tony falls. Shooting Tony means killing his hostage too. Hence, Tony is able to take Richard to his apartment unimpeded, where he holds him for several days.

Meanwhile, ambitious young Black TV journalist Linda Page (Myha’la), who happens upon the scene, recruits her cameraman and starts filming the events, despite her boss’ efforts to hand off the assignment to a more experienced (and white, male) reporter. Events unfold that also involve at popular radio DJ, Fred Temple (Colman Domingo) known for his philosophical, Everyman musings on the radio. Tony Kiritsis is a fan, and the police try to use the DJ as a way to reach the kidnapper. Cary Elwes plays plainclothes detective Mike Grable, who was first on the scene, and who tries to be a calming figure to establish rapport with the kidnapper.

This bizarre crime and ensuing police standoff takes on a media circus-like air out in the Midwestern city streets, but the film also spends a lot of time inside Tony’s apartment, with just Tony and Richard, who goes by Dick. Holed up in Tony’s apartment, we get to know both oddball Tony and buttoned-down Richard. Dick is very much under the thumb of his wealthy father. M.L. knew Tony was on the edge, yet M. L. deliberately leaves his son to deal with the loaded situation, while M. L. heads out of town, becoming unavailable for any face-to-face. In truth, Richard is as much exploited by his father M. L. as his client Tony is.

As the hostage situation goes on, a kind of cat-and-mouse relationship evolves between the two men, with the more outgoing Tony even becoming rather friendly towards Richard, in a bit of reverse Stockholm Syndrome. But whether that does Richard any good is another matter. Eventually, Tony issues his demands, which include an apology from M. L. Hall personally.

Skarsgard’s outstanding performance is supported well by the rest of the cast, including particularly Dacre Montgomery, who plays the kidnapped banker Richard Hall. All the cast are good, with Colman Domingo another strong character as the DJ drawn into the situation. The wealthy M.L. Hall is played as distracted and distant by Al Pacino, in a strong performance, and there also is a little parallel to the real-life kidnapping of millionaire J. P. Getty’s grandson here, as negotiations begin.

That shotgun wired to hostage Richard’s neck ensures tensions are constantly high, but the quirkiness of the people involved, the unpredictability of both their nature, and the situation, make this a film where you never know what will happen next. None of this goes like the typical movie hostage situation. No character feels that strangeness more keenly that Coleman Domingo’s radio DJ, recruited as a sort of hostage negotiator, a role he’d rather not play. The ambitions of the young reporter, the determination of the cops, led by Cary Elwes’ Mike Grable, to find a way out, and the pressure on everyone of being on camera and in the public eye constantly adds fuel to the incendiary situation. And remember these are real people and real events, something that Van Sant reminds the audience about by inserting actual footage of the real events.

While some may see the film as anti-capitalist, that is not quite an accurate description, as the “common man” at its center is also a businessman, even if he is not too successful. Instead, DEAD MAN’S WIRE, in part, is more commentary on the warping of the American Dream and the old American free enterprise system, an aspirational ideal in a post-WWII world marked by the Marshall Plan, but which came to a crashing end in the “greed is good” 1980s. The old free enterprise system promised a level playing field for even small businesses to compete fairly, and succeed through hard work and good ideas, rather than through a “thumb on the scale” and unscrupulous, deceitful practices. Kiritsis’ his lack of success is not due, per se, to lack of skill in business, but by the tilted playing field upon which he treads, ironically being skewed by his own lender, who in a more ethical world be his ally. Instead, his banker is concealing that his thumb is on the scale, and has plans to turn his client’s misery to his advantage. The film’s themes are less anti-capitalist than anti-unscrupulous, a condemnation of predatory business practices, contrasting human dealings versus dehumanized practices, the latter style one which Al Pacino’s morality-free character represents well.

Gus Van Sant’s DEAD MAN’S WIRE is highly entertaining as a crime thriller, as well as a technically impressive film, and enhanced by first rate performances particularly by Bill Skarsgard in what may be a career best, as well as working as historical drama and commentary on a slanted economic system.

DEAD MAN’S WIRE opens in theaters on Friday, Jan. 9, 2026.

RATING: 4 out of 4 stars

EMILY THE CRIMINAL – Review

Aubrey Plaza in EMILY THE CRIMINAL. Courtesy of Roadside Attractions and Vertical Entertainment

With Aubrey Plaza as the star and the odd title EMILY THE CRIMINAL, one might be reasonably expect some dark comedy but, no, this film is anything but funny. Instead, director John Patton Ford serves up what seems at first to be pointed social commentary on modern economic unfairness. until it morphs into a dark thriller with a feminist slant. In EMILY THE CRIMINAL, Aubrey Plaza plays a young woman with artistic talent and a pile of student loan debt who is struggling to make a living and dreaming about breaking through to white-color work. Emily (Plaza) is hard-working but is held back by a low-level criminal record that haunts her and leaves her with only low paid jobs and gig work. Offered a chance to make some quick cash, she takes what she thinks is a one-time opportunity, although it is illegal. Yet doing so opens a door to a new side of Emily, as she finds a surprising sense of power, in this mix of thriller and dark social commentary.

It is not comedy but it is a rare chance for Aubrey Plaza to show off her serious acting chops. Along the way, there is plenty of biting, sarcastic dialog for serious Plaza fans.

EMILY THE CRIMINAL opens with a telling scene of the income inequality and economic unfairness of modern American capitalism. The film opens with Emily (Plaza) interviewing for a job. The interview asks about her “criminal record” and Emily sheepishly owns up to a DUI, with an explanation that she was the least drunk of her friends and chalks it up to youthful poor judgment. But it isn’t what the interviewer has in mind, as he already did an background check on her and uncovered a felony conviction for assault. It shocks us, and her, and she starts to explain, then stops short and rages against him for laying a trap for her, when he already knew, and railing against the invasion of privacy and the pointlessness of the interview.

It does leave us wondering why she was there, if it was nothing but a mean prank. As she rails against her mistreatment, she reveals that she is desperately trying to pay off a large student loan for art school before storming out. She returns to the only job she can get with this “criminal record” hanging over her, that of a gig worker for a catering company. That the assault involved an abusive ex-boyfriend is something we learn later, as well as the lack of money and a family emergency that caused her to leave college before finishing the degree.

Emily’s criminal record is a kind of modern scarlet letter, and an economic trap she can’t escape, no matter how talented and hard-working she is. Her best friend from art school Liz (Megalyn Echikunwoke) is working at a prestigious ad agency but reluctant to recommend Emily for fear of endangering her own employment. In this pre-pandemic world, the employers hold all the power but even now, the ability that employers have to do background checks on any potential hires still leaves people like Emily out in the cold. It is a betrayal of the old ideal of America as a land of second chances.

Back at her restaurant gig job, a co-worker tips Emily off to a side job, as a “dummy shopper,” saying she can make $200 in one day. With the student loan weighing on her, she calls and shows up a nearly-abandoned office space, along with a roomful of others. When the trainer, a handsome, soft-spoken man named Youcef (Theo Rossi) starts to describe what they will be doing, she learns that the job is an illegal one, buying big-ticket items with stolen credit card numbers and turning over the merchandise. At the mention that it is illegal, Youcef pauses and invites anyone who is uncomfortable with that to simply leave now, no problem. Emily gets up to do that, but then reconsiders. She and the rest of the roomful of people are told this is a one-time thing, just quick money. Emily signs on.

This dabbling in the criminal world goes on for a while, with Emily signing up a second time for the easy money and finding a mutual attraction with Youcef. But then the film takes a sharp turn, away from social commentary and a woman ground down by economic circumstances, to something darker, more edgy and more a crime thriller. Emily finds herself drawn to the power she feels in this world, and what follows are several harrowing scenes, where the tables are suddenly turned and an unexpected outcome emerges.

Aubrey Plaza is fabulous in this role, making her troubled character both sympathetic no matter what she does, and a femme powerhouse by turns. Using a Jersey accent that gives her character a little edge, we suspect there was always a darkness and steel within her, something her friend from art-school lacks. When Emily talks about the assault charge involving the ex-boyfriend, she says the problem was not that she went too far, but that she did not go far enough to make him afraid of her. It is not what we expect from the character we first met, yet we kind of know it was there all along too.

There is a feminist empowerment side to this film but it is a dark version of that. At one point, Emily goes to meet Youcef’s Lebanese mother, who asks her what she does for a living. “Emily the teacher?” she asks sweetly, and when Emily replies she is not yet sure what her career will be, the woman assures her she will discover her true life path. But is Emily already a “criminal” at the beginning of the film, marked as such by a harsh system, or is it something she chooses? It could go either way in this smart, unsettling crime thriller.

EMILY THE CRIMINAL opens Friday, August 12, in theaters.

RATING: 3 out of 4 stars

Review: INSIDE JOB

Many documentaries have a problem in that by the the time they are completed their subject matter is not current. Such is not the case with Charles Ferguson’s look at the banking crisis INSIDE JOB. Just coming off a heated election, bail outs have been in the public eye for some time. The film covers the economic scandals from just a few months ago.

Strangely enough, the film opens with a look at the economy of Iceland in 2000. The problems unleashed there by privatizing the banks were a warning call that the rest of the world seemed to ignore. Like his fellow documentarian Michael Moore, Ferguson believes most of the problems began with the economic policies of the Reagan administration. In the 80’s many restrictions were lifted from banks and soon investment firms were doubling and tripling in size.  Several of the investment firm executives went on to work for the government and made sure that no regulations could be put into place. Eventually the rise of derivative trading would lead to the foreclosures that reduced towns to Hooverville-like tent communities. After the collapse of the firms, many execs went right to jobs in academia and as consultants to government.

Ferguson keeps the film moving at a good clip aided by the steady narration of actor Matt Damon and the frequent use of news footage and simple graphic images and charts. After hearing these terms in the news it’s great to have them explained in a clear manner. Unfortunately many of the people most mentioned(Hank Paulson, Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, Tim Geitner) did not consent ot be interviewed. The main interviewees are shot as standard talking heads and are identified. They even talk to a  woman who ran an escort service about her many clients at Wall Street. Some verbal fireworks are provided late in the film when a former Bush advisor is asked about a possible conflict of interest[“You have three minutes sir, take your best shot!]This is not to say that the film is slanted to the left. Many of these advisers and consultants seem to go with both the GOP and Democratic administrations. It seems that the vast banking lobby is too much for either party to resist. All in all Ferguson has done a fine job on shining a light on a complicated issue affecting us all. You may feel a bit frustrated, but you’ll be more aware and informed.

Overall Rating: Four out of Five Stars