MERRILY WE ROLL ALONG (2025) – Review

During this cold, hectic holiday season, what could be more invigorating than taking in a big Broadway musical hit? But there’s no need to hop on a plane to the Big Apple, this recent smash is at your local multiplex (or at a big “single screen”, if you’re so fortunate). It’s not a new idea, since Disney tried it five years ago with HAMILTON. The pandemic scrapped plans for a wide theatrical release, so it premiered on their streaming app (however, a few months ago it enjoyed a brief big-screen run). Well, now Sony Classics is behind a filmed version of a recent (it was shot last year) multi-Tony awarding winning revival of a 1981 work from a giant of musical theater. However, this didn’t “click” on the Great White Way nearly 45 years ago, though it’s grown in stature with his fans (even getting a nod in LADY BIRD). This one worked, perhaps due to a bit of “magic” from the star of a huge film franchise. Will the same thing occur when the (movie) theater curtain rises for MERRILY WE ROLL ALONG?


The show’s format sets it apart, as the story is told in reverse, going back in time from its big splashy opening number in 1976. We’re in a swanky beach house in Malibu to celebrate the opening of a new hit movie, and its “buzzed-about” producer, Frank Shepard (Jonathan Groff). Everybody’s feeding his ego, except for an old friend turned theater critic, Mary Flynn (Lindsay Mendez). She taunts him over his split with another pal, being a ‘sell-out” to his musical theater roots, and drinks too much before existing. The plot shifts to 1973 and a disastrous TV interview with Frank and his former songwriting partner, Charley Kringas (Daniel Radcliffe), which leads to the aforementioned “bust-up”. We also get to experience the second Mrs. Shepard, stage diva Gussie Carnegie (Krystal Joy Brown). The following scenes are set 3 to 4 years in the trio’s history, with Shepard and Kringas becoming Broadway hit-makers with producer Joe Joesphson (Reg Rogers), the first hubby of Gussie. We also meet Frank’s first wife, Beth (Katie Rose Clarke), as the two fall in and out of love while becoming the parents of Frank Jr. (Max Rackenberg). The “march of time” backtracks all the way to 1957, when the trifecta of Mary, Frank, and Charley begin their then-optimistic journey to become “old friends”.

Of course, that “magic maker” I mentioned earlier is the very talented Mr. Radcliffe, who becomes somewhat of a Broadway staple with another revival of a classic (he did succeed in “How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying” several years ago. Though he’s more of a “featured player”, Radcliffe has plenty of moments to shine as the snarky lyricist who feels discarded. This is really accented in his show-stopping number, the acerbic “Franklin Shepard, Inc” (the guy can really handle those “tongue-twisters”). So, who’s the lead, then? According to the Tonys, it’s Groff as the “morally-challenged” Frank whose soul seems to chip away with every year, giving Groff a chance to go from dark to light with each “rewind”. His big number is probably “Growing Up” as Frank gets a “wake-up call” after his showbiz dreams. The most dramatic role is probably Mary, offering Mendez the chance to hurl barbs and burns, while giving us a glimpse into her heartbreak as she pines for the clueless Frank. And her “pipes” get a great workout with “Now You Know” along with several duets and tunes with her two pals. The entire ensemble is great with outstanding work by Brown as the vampy Gussie (doing high-kicks in a sparkly gown), the funny-turned-tragic Rogers as the schlubby cynical Joe, and the gifted physical comedian and superb singer Clarke as the sweet, sorrowful Beth.


These stage pros are guided by Maria Friedman who also directed the London West End revival that spawned this US company. The pacing is superb, with performers promptly establishing the changing years, while arranging the period props and settings. Oh, the musical theater icon is Stephen Sondheim, who crafted the superb music and lyrics with his usual wit and inspired rhymes and song structure, though without any huge “”standards”, with “Old Friends” perhaps the most enduring. His “Company” collaborator George Furth cleverly adapted and updated the 1934 play by George S. Kaufman and Moss hart, getting in plenty of digs at showbiz deceptions and rivalries, elicitng laughs and a deep melancholy since we see the seeds of heartbreak planted that will destroy marriages and that central friendship. This isn’t frothy “taps and taps”, rather it’s got a real bite, which may explain why it’s taken many years to be appreciated. And now we can bask in its wonder from a reasonably-priced (have you heard about those Broadway tickets) movie theater seat and enjoy the terrific talents at work in MERRILY WE ROLL ALONG.

3.5 Out of 4

MERRILY WE ROLL ALONG is now playing in select theaters

WAKE UP DEAD MAN – Review

Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery. (L-R) Josh O’Connor and Josh Brolin in Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery. Cr. John Wilson/Netflix © 2025

Enormously entertaining, WAKE UP DEAD MAN offers more than a good murder mystery, delving into the soulful with an ex-boxer priest, playing excellently by Josh O’Connor, seeking his own forgiveness and an unforgiving monsignor, played menacingly by Josh Brolin, with his own little kingdom in a Gothic church isolated in a rural upstate New York that feels straight out of “The Headless Horseman.” Rian Johnson’s third installment in his Knives Out mystery series may be his best yet, featuring his droll Southern detective Beniot Blanc, the two Joshes and a star-studded cast of supporting players including Glen Close, Andrew Scott, and more.

A murder in a church sounds wrong but in Rian Johnson’s capable hands it turns into the perfect place in a story that pits faith and love against power and evil. The Gothic setting lends itself well to the tale of long-buried secrets and hidden motives in this isolated, claustrophobic small community. But director/writer Johnson makes you wait a bit for the crime and the detective, focusing first on Josh O’Connor’s priest as he grapples with his spiritual journey, trying to put love at the forefront, and overcoming the rage that led to him killing a man in the boxing ring.

To help him in wrestling those inner spiritual demons, and to help the church to unravel the curious goings-on at a remote little parish, his bishop (an unexpectedly darkly funny Jeffrey Wright) gives the young priest his first assignment. Not to replace the mysterious long-time priest, a monsignor, at that ancient church but as to be the assistant priest, and perhaps figure out what is happening there.

Josh O’Connor’s priest starts out with a firm belief in the power of love but a more knowing eye for human failings, his own and others. He arrives at the ancient church, which looks more like it was transported whole, complete with churchyard graves, from old England than something in New England. Josh Brolin’s parish priest gives the newcomer a chilly greeting, insisting on being called monsignor, and immediately asking him to hear his confession, a scalding one that leaves the young priest staggering. The battle of the Joshes is on.

Rian Johnson spins out this tale brilliantly, crafting the characters and the mystery to draw you in, and adding plenty of humor and twists along the way. Daniel Craig’s detective arrives a bit late but from that point on, the film takes the brakes off for a wild, massively entertaining ride, while still keeping it’s good versus evil. Figuring out who is good and who is evil is part of the fun.

Reportedly, this is the last of Rian Johnson’s Knives Out mysteries, which is disappointing news if true. This mystery is the best of the series, demonstrating the elastic nature of the genre and showcasing Johnson’s considerable talent.

Of course, that is aided mightily by the wonderful cast, especially first-rate performances from Josh O’Connor, who is really having a year, and Daniel Craig, as the clever, quipping detective. Some of best moments are between these two, as the believer debates the non-believer, in dialog that is both though-provoking and entertaining. Who wants to see that kind of film-making come to an end?

WAKE UP DEAD MAN opens Wednesday, Nov. 26, in theaters.

RATING: 4 out of 4 stars

ETERNITY (2025) – Review

So what new genre are the fine folks at A24 going to tackle now? This current “indie darling” studio has made its mark with searing dramas and harrowing horror (I can’t even think about BRING HER BACK). What’s next? How about the “rom com”? Sure, this year’s MATERIALISTS would qualify, though it’s a pretty sharp comedic commentary on the current dating scene. Maybe they’ll look into one of those “sub-genres” such as the “fantasy/rom com”. Yes, indeed, their foray drops in theaters this holiday weekend. The fantasy part is the setting for most of the story: the afterlife. But there are no halos, or wings, or harps (maybe on the soundtrack). The plot concerns souls that are in a kind of limbo as they ponder some big decisions. See, it’s not just a question of “where” you want to spend the afterlife (more about that in a bit), bur rather “who” you want to be by your side for all of ETERNITY.


The story really starts on good ole’ planet Earth, today. The long-time elderly married couple, the Cutlers, are on their way to a “gender reveal” party, spurring much debate about current quirky traditions. But the celebration takes a tragic turn and suddenly the hubby/grandpa’ is on a very bizarre train. And he’s not in his 80s, instead he looks to be a spry thirty-something. Larry (Miles Teller) arrives at an equally strange station and is met by Anna (Da’Vine Joy Randolph) who explains to him that he has passed away and is in a heavenly ‘holding zone”. She’s his personal “Afterlife Coordinator”, further explaining that he is at his “happiest age” and has a week to decide which “afterlife area” he will exist forever. Lots of reps for the many different “worlds” bombard him with sales pitches (maybe “Sports world” or “Business world”, among hundreds of choices). But hey, Larry wants to be with his wife, so he has the option of staying in this zone and taking a job (the place resembles a massive resort) until his love arrives (dies, really). It doesn’t seem like a bad choice after conversing with a friendly affable bartender named Luke (Callum Turner) who’s pouring drinks until his lady love shows up. It’s not too long until Larry’s beloved checks in at the train station. A disoriented Joan (Elizabeth Olsen) is greeted by her own “AC”, Ryan (John Early). Anna swoops in with Larry, but Ryan has another option. Seems he’s also the AC for Joan’s first husband, who had been killed in a war not long after they wed. And you can guess who that is. Now, Joan has to make the biggest decision of her life (actually afterlife). Should she join Luke in “Mountain world” or be with Larry in “Beach world”? Let the chaotic comedy contest begin…

Although this flick is marketed as an otherworldly love triangle, the “side” with the most screen time is probably Teller as the often befuddled and a bit coarse Larry. Though, he made his mark in action flicks like the TOP GUN sequel and the “under-the-radar” sci-fi/romance THE GORGE. Teller displays a deft comedic touch here as Larry schemes to “wreck the system” in order to win his lady’s heart. Plus, he scores some big laughs as he still thinks like an 80-year-old despite his youthful vigor. With the right script, Teller could carry an all-out farce. At the center of this “tug-of-war” is Olsen as the ever-flustered Joan. She’s more known for her dramatic fare, along with being part of the MCU, so it’s great to see Olsen taking a chance in this genre. Like Larry, she’s in the “old soul/young body” dilemma, though she’s not given enough “shtick” before Joan is being torn by the big choice. The other fella’ turning up the heat is the more stoic Luke, played by Turner as more of a “fish out of water”, being a man from the 1950s dealing with a duo from the next century. Plus, he’s more grounded since he’s been in this “zone” a very long time. Rather than joining in the gags, Turner conveys a smouldering intensity in order to make Larry “step up his game”. Oscar-winner Randolph as Anna has a nice snarky delivery while doing a great slow burn as Larry really gets on her “last nerve” despite her eternal tenure. She’s a nice contrast to Early as the rival AC, who displays a prim but perky aggressiveness which irritates Anna. Also of note is the funny deadpan performance by Ryan Beil as Fenwick, the bored ticket taker at the “museum of memories”.


The assured, steady direction is by David Freyne, who also worked on the script with Patrick Cunnane. He keeps the pace flowing for most of the first half, and giving this fantasy backdrop a grounded look, combining elements of a sales convention (lots of reps recruiting) and a massive vacation hotel (I was reminded of the interior wall of room inside the Luxor in Vegas). Somehow he keeps us focused on the trio, forgoing any flashy effects and camera techniques. And then the big “lull’ occurs at the midway point, just as we should be more invested in the big conflict. It just seems to run out of “juice”. Maybe more bits of satire were needed in the script since most of the “other worlds” are mentioned and tossed aside (I will say that the best joke concerns a world that’s unavailable due to its appeal to women, and I’m not talking about a “Chippendale’s World”). By the final act, we’re just reminded of the much better realized afterlife rom/coms like the 70s HEAVEN CAN WAIT and especially Albert Brooks’ DEFENDING YOUR LIFE. It’s a shame because the three lead actors are really trying to make the premise work, but when the jokes wear thin and the producers try to pluck at our heartstrings, this time spent at the multiplex really does feel like an ETERNITY.


2 Out of 4

ETERNITY opens in theatres on Wednesday, November 26, 2025

TIME TRAVEL IS DANGEROUS – Review

A scene from British sci-fi comedy TIME TRAVEL IS DANGEROUS. Courtesy of Level 33 Entertainment

TIME TRAVEL IS DANGEROUS  is a droll British sci-fi comedy is low budget, low key and low delivery, under-serving a high concept. Writer/director Chris Reading started with an amusing twist on the time-travel milieu. Two rather dim-witted women (Ruth Syratt and Megan Stevenson) who own a dowdy resale shop stumble across a small vehicle that was dumped in an alley by its disenchanted inventors, who never quite mastered its time-hopping capabilities. The ladies use it to snatch clothes and minor objects from earlier eras to upgrade the inventory of their failing business, filling the humble rented space to the rafters with relics of affordable consumer value. No heists. No cash grabs. Just stuff that wouldn’t be missed much by its owners.

The haul includes videotapes of a public-access version of Mr. Wizard starring two guys (Johnny Vegas and Kiell Smith-Bynoe) who happen to have been the machine’s inventors. They are now part of a club of eccentric wannabe inventors with what could have been a charming cast of oddballs. The right cast was in place, but without the right writing to let them shine.

Although the bones were there for a delightful romp, the script failed to deliver the goods. Some of the best-known actors – Stephen Fry, Brian Blessed, Jane Horrocks – were underutilized. What we end up with could have been called BILLIE AND TEDDIE’S EXCELLENT ADVENTURE, if the temporal sojourners weren’t named Ruth and Megan. Their visits to earlier times, ranging from the age of dinosaurs to recent decades, are among the film’s best moments. But they were too small a percentage of the running time. One long sequence in a sort of time-warp limbo was intriguing – as if an ALICE IN WONDERLAND style of encounter had been written and directed by Terry Gilliam.

Budget limitations are obvious, and perhaps should be used to cut this production more slack. Time-travel shows are inherently fraught with logical issues, even when played for laughs. This one avoided some of the usual traps, but became more annoying than engaging as events unfolded. Too much petty quibbling among, and bad decisions by, the principals for entertainment value.

TIME TRAVEL IS DANGEROUS opens in select theaters and on-demand on Friday, Nov. 21, 2025.

RATING: 1.5 out of 4 stars

STILLER & MEARA: NOTHING IS LOST – Review

Here’s a terrific showbiz documentary that’s been sent to streaming just months after another superb one, MY MOM JAYNE (which is still on HBO Max, if it’s still called that). Aside from both this doc’s subjects also being a big part of 20th century pop culture, they also both deal with siblings (both are directors of their docs), who are stars in their own right, discovering their parent(s) through boxes and cases of old recordings, press clippings, and notebooks. Sure, some of the legacy of Jayne Mansfield is fairly funny (such tacky fashions), this new film really explores humor, because it’s about a comedy team. That phrase usually conjures up Laurel & Hardy, the Stooges, those Marx Brothers, but this is one of the rare male/female teamings. While their early 60s contemporaries Nichols & May never settled down, this duo, like Burns & Allen decades before, married and started a family. Here’s the story of how their son Ben discovered that, with STILLER & MEARA: NOTHING IS LOST. Really, it’s all there…

The son, of course, is actor/director/writer/producer Ben Stiller. His father Jerry passed away in 2020, five years after his mom, Anne Meara. Since the world was in lockdown due to the pandemic, Ben decided to prepare their longtime Riverside apartment in NYC for an eventual sale (and take one last spin around with his camera). Before the place could be “staged” for presentation to buyers, Ben, and sister Amy, dove into the cases and cartons of material their folks had accumulated over nearly 70 years. Jerry and Anne married in 1953, and as they took on acting gigs in early TV and the theater, they decided to go out as a comedy team. And they were successful, first in nightclubs, and then becoming a favorite of Ed Sullivan (he booked them on his show 36 times). Ben and Amy relive those old days as they pour over correspondence (seeing their love letters), listening to countless audio cassettes, and watching grainy 8mm home movies. . Somehow, their folks almost return to vivid life, guiding Ben through a very difficult time (his recent separation from wife Christine Taylor). Along this nostalgic journey, Ben interviews his own family, along with dear friends of his parents, including actor Christopher Walken and playwright John Guare. In putting together this loving cinematic tribute, Ben realizes how similar his own life, personal and professional, to his recently departed mom and pop, Could this be sage parent advice and consul from the “Great Beyond”?

Talk about your “labor of love”! What a splendid, interesting and entertaining film which should help dispel that old notion that “documentaries are homework”. Certainly, Ben does make use of the doc trope of “talking heads” (mainly with his aunt), but he’s found a way to juggle and intercut the archival photos and footage in a fresh, compelling way. The segments from the Sullivan show are crisp, looking as though they aired new last Sunday night, while we also get the grainy VHS (or maybe half inch) video dupes of the duo co-hosting “The Mike Douglas Show” and bringing in little Benji and Amy for a sweet, though “ear-testing” violin duet. The notebook scribblings and the murky (sounds like a basement) audio of Anne and Jerry working out a routine for a TV appearance, gives us a rare peek at the creative process. We hear that Anne was relaxed and confident performing while Jerry was a perfection who fretted and “over-rehearsed”, which Ben recognizes in his own work discipline (yup, a chip off the “old man’s” block). There’s a big contrast in the duo’s early years. Jerry wasn’t encouraged by his folks, while Anne was the adored “princess”, perhaps because hers was a single parent household due to a horrific suicide. It’s also fascinating that when the team split, the marriage got a bit stronger since Anne could,at last, pursue dramatic roles and Jerry could finally be the solo comic he dreamed of (his lauded work on the TV sitcoms “Seinfeld” and “King of Queens” in his 70s is one heck of a rousing career third act). Plus the film does shine a light on Ben’s rise with his own 8mm films and videos (starring Jerry), while he also “takes the heat” during the one-on-one-interviews with his spouse and two kids (daughter Ella is still ticked that he cut her out of one of his features). Pressure and guilt (being away too long) are shared by both generations in the “biz”. This is a “pull-no-punches” journey, though with a touch of sweet nostalgia, that is a must for comedy fans (the “collection” is now part of the Museum of Comedy in New York state) of the current media icon and the team that spawned him. Hopefully they’ll be “rediscovered” and found via STILLER & MEARA: NOTHING IS LOST.

3.5 out of 4

STILLER & MEARA : NOTHING IS LOST is now streaming exclusively on Apple TV+ and is playing in select theaters

BLUE MOON (2025) – Review

Can there really be two music biopics opening this weekend? Yes, though they share little in common other than popular songs. The “Boss” flick is set in the early 1980s and zeroes in on a couple of years of his career. This film is set nearly forty years before, and it mainly (other than a brief prologue) happens during one fateful night. And it’s pretty much set in one place. Oh, and rather than the world of rock and roll, this comedy/drama is in the world of musical theater on Broadway (technically musical comedy, I suppose). You may not know the name of this film’s main focus, but after eighty years, much of the world is still singing his lyrics, especially the often-recorded and revived BLUE MOON.

Yes, you read that correctly. This film isn’t about a tunesmith, but rather a writer of lyrics. In that aforementioned prologue, we see a diminutive man shuffling and stumbling through a rain-drenched alley. That man is Lorenz Hart (Ethan Hawke). The story then shifts to a few months in the past, the evening of March 31, 1943, the opening of the classic Broadway musical, “Oklahoma”. Lorenz, along with his mother, watches from an exclusive “box seat” until he can stand no more of the “corn pone”. Telling his mom that he needs a drink, Hart sprints away to Sardi’s restaurant, where the show’s after-party will be held. In the first floor bar area, he begins to kibitz with his old bartender pal Eddie (Bobby Cannavale). He’ll only serve Lorenz club soda, as he has a big booze problem, though a bottle is keep near “for appearances”. Hart is both looking forward to and dreading a reunion with his old writing partner Richard Rodgers (Andrew Scott), now teamed with Oscar Hammerstein II (Simon Delaney). But Hart is ecstatic about a tryst with young Yale art student Elizabeth Weiland (Margaret Qualley). Eddie’s a bit confused, since he though Lorenz leaned toward another gender. Hart insists that he’s fluid and, despite their 27-year age difference, believes that tonight’s the big night for them. As he bemoans the impending demise of wit on the “Great White Way”, Hart notices a man writing at a table. It’s one of his favorite authors, E.B. White (Patrick Kennedy). The two bound over their love of language until Elizabeth arrives. As she regales Hart with stories of college “hook-ups”, the “Oklahoma” entourage dashes in for cocktails and to read the early rave reviews. Hart corners Rodgers to pitch a new pairing while discussing a revival of an older work. As the new Broadway “darlings” begin to depart, Hart ponders whether he’ll ever be back on “top”, in his profession and in his personal life.

This film is truly a tour de force showcase for the acting artistry of Hawke as he tackles a truly complex artist. His work goes beyond the “gimmick” of appearing to be a spin on Jose Ferrer as Toulouse Lautrec in MOULIN ROUGE and his severe “comb-over” to give life to a man riddled with insecurity, struggling to retain his dignity, all the while obsessively trying to regain the “brass ring”, be it Broadway success or the elusive young protégé. In Hart’s meeting with Rodgers, Hawke conveys that pleading sweaty desperation while acting as if nothing as really changed between. This might be the defining performance of Hawke’s impressive career. Luckily, the engaging Cannavale proves to be a superb scene partner as Eddie, who is alternately amused and disgusted by Hart’s antics (his “BS detector” is working overtime) while making sure he steers clear of the booze that will destroy him. Qualley is a wide-eyed, bouncy blonde dream girl as the effusive, but unknowingly encouraging Elizabeth.. She thinks of Hart as a mentor, while dismissing his often clumsy advances. Then there’s Hart’s other object of desire, a re-teaming with the “man that got away”, Rodgers, given a distracted air by the compelling Scott. Yes, he’s happy to be showered with praise, but he’s not entirely indifferent to his former partner. Scott shows us that as he tries to toss Hart a life preserver (a revival of their old show) while defending pointed barbs at his latest work (there’s a place for sentiment in the war-torn world) and trying to make it clear that he’s part of a different duo. Their interplay is both amusing and sad, much like the ending of a theatrical marriage.


Longtime Hawke collaborator Richard Linklater directs from a very literate script from Robert Kaplow that deftly balances comedy and tragedy in the tale of longing and regret. Hart had once had everything until he squandered it all due to his addictions and an ego bigger than his slight frame. Yes, it does often resemble a stage play after the brief alley prologue and the scene that follows during the finale of “Oklahoma”, but the character dynamics and bouncy retorts expand the confines of the bar (though we do explore the “water closet” briefly). The period costumes are quite stunning, especially Qualley’s gown, and the soundtrack filled with period tunes (from Hart and others) is very effective. Plus, this story is pure “catnip” for musical comedy buffs , especially when we get a brief moment with Oscar’s precocious young guest (stage fans will get it). It’s not a sprawling epic, but fans of the era, and the excellent cast, will be enchanted. Why, they might just be over the BLUE MOON about it.

3 Out of 4

BLUE MOON is now playing in select theatres

GOOD FORTUNE (2025) – Review

This big new studio film release takes a tough look at the social economics system in place today. So, it’s a hard-hitting drama or maybe a “searing” slice-of-life documentary? No, it’s a comedy. Stranger still, it’s a fantasy comedy about the “haves” and “have-nots”. It’s about what happens when a rich guy and a “barely scraping by” guy switch lifestyles. And yes, its makers openly acknowledge the 83′ TRADING PLACES, even lifting a “needle drop” as a tribute. So, the fantasy element? It’s not a witch or a djinn or even a fairy godmother (or father). Instead, the “status quo” is upended by an angel. And he’s a bit inept, but (due to the casting) always “awesome” as he delivers a much needed (but is it deserved) “batch” of GOOD FORTUNE.

In the opening moments, we meet that angel watching over the streets of modern-day LA from a rooftop. He’s Gabriel (Keanu Reeves), who may be considered a “second string”, “budget”, or a “minor” angel (his fairly small wings are a hint), who is tasked with alerting those highway menaces who “text while driving”. Gabe pops into their car’s backseat, touches their shoulder, causing them to look up from their “holy” screen. He’s kept busy, but Gabe wants to do more. Perhaps that’s why he takes an interest in one of his “humans”, Arj (Aziz Ansari), an aspiring documentary filmmaker who is mired in the “gig economy” (he’s a “task sergeant”) while trying to get his “big break”. Later, at a meeting of angels, Gabe tells his supervisor Martha (Sandra Oh) that he wants to aid Arj much like adored “lost souls” angel Azrael (Stephen McKinley Henderson). She sternly tells him that he must “stay in his lane”. But Gabe still hovers near Arj as he becomes an assistant (for a one-week trial period) to a wealthy “tech bro” Jeff (Seth Rogan). But when Arj uses a “work charge card” for a surprisingly expensive date with a cute union organizer at a “big box” hardware store, Elena (Keke Palmer), Jeff fires him (despite Arj telling his account that he’ll pay it back). Arj is at his lowest point when is car (also his bedroom) is towed at a Denny’s lot. Then Gabe appears to him and offers him a chance to switch places with Jeff, thinking this will teach him that money isn’t everything. But Arj loves it (Jeff is his poor, hapless aide). Gabe appears to Jeff, and confesses the life “swap”. Things get more convoluted when Martha demote Gabe (no wings, no magic, just human). Can he and Jeff survive on the mean streets long enough to get Arj to go back to his old existence, which will get Gabe his old job back (along with those “heavenly perks”)?

The marketing big selling point is Reeves as Gabriel, though many may think of him as an action movie icon (forever Mr. Wick to some). Here he reminds us of his considerable comedic “chops” as he scores near constant laughs as the dim adult-cherub whose line delivery almost echoes the much adored iconic Ted Logan. But Reeves adds so much appreciated pathos to Gabe as we see his childlike wonder, and eventually annoyance, over the ways of “reg’lar folk” (loves them chicken “nuggies”). Also hitting the “pathos button” hard is Azari has the constantly “dumped-on” Arj who is a good man dealt a very “bad hand” by life. He still retains a sweetness beyond the snark, especially in his interactions with Elena (the talented Ms. Palmer builds on her similarly-themed “under the radar” comic romp from earlier in the year, ONE OF THEM DAYS). Sure, Arj is ecstatic over the “turn of events”, though Ansari conveys Arj’s guilt over a life unearned (but not ready to leave). The very busy Mr. Rogen (with two terrific streaming comedies, “The Studio” and “Platonic”) is strong as the somewhat spoiled app-investor who finds out how his impulsive decisions can really impact other, when he becomes one of them. His arrogance is soon squashed as he confronts the challenges of the “now”. Though we only see her briefly, Oh adds the proper gravitas (and is the perfect comic “straight” to Reeves) as the somber Martha, while Matt Rogers is effective as Arj’s new “big bucks” buddy Peter.


In his big screen directing debut (after the still shelved BEING MORTAL). Ansari directs with a light touch, slipping the jokes “in” quietly and avoiding lots of frenetic bombast. There is some slapstick as Arj almost echoes the often hapless Everyman played in the silents by Keaton and Lloyd. The LA locations are used well, from the ultra swank home of Jeff high above the city, to the street-level squalor that he now roams with the “de-winged” Gabe. The opening act is so strong that it makes the rest of the story a bit sluggish. This may be due to the structure of Asnari’s script (with elements of CITY OF ANGELS, THE FAMILY MAN, IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE, and the aforementioned TP) which jarringly shifts focus after the switch. We’ve been following Arj so closely that it’s difficult to suddenly being with Jeff and Gabe nearly all through the last hour. This makes its length feel much greater than just under 100 minutes. And while a lot of the plot is a zany romp, it takes a rather preachy detour, making the case for corporate empathy (which will properly be ignored by the 1%), even shifting to Elena’s push for a union at her hardware store. It’s a shame that the final result falls short on the inspired premise and casting (particularly for Reeves). Now, that would certainly be some prime cinematic GOOD FORTUNE.

2.5 Out of 4

GOOD FORTUNE is now playing in theaters everywhere

TWINLESS – Review

Now this new film would be tough to categorize for anyone trying to recommend it to other moviegoers, let alone the writers for theatre chain websites. And that’s a good thing, since the multiplex really needs to have some fare that can’t be “pigeonholed” into a select “by-the-numbers” genre. Though many might not enjoy that, I really get a kick out of stories that throw me a “curve” or just keep me “off balance”. As a movie “Mulligan’s stew”, this dramedy/mystery/romantic character study with some sexy “spice” makes a tasty meal as you find out just what is the meaning of its provocative title, TWINLESS.

We’re “clued in” early on in this story when we hear some noise (tires screeching, a thud) from a fatal accident on a busy urban street, just “off camera”. From there, we’re taken to a graveside funeral service for a young man in his late twenties named Rocky. The mourners are stunned to see the departed’s twin brother in attendance, Roman (Dylan O’Brien), next to his mother, Lisa (Lauren Graham). Back at Rocky’s apartment, the two clash while going through his things before she heads back home. Roman remains in the city, and to calm his anger issues, attends a meeting of a support group for people who have lost their identical twin. There, he strikes up a conversation with Dennis (James Sweeney). During their talk, Dennis tosses out a casual joke about his sexuality (he’s gay). Straight Roman tells him that his brother Rocky was “out and proud”. The two exchange numbers after going to a nearby diner. Although they’re quite different (Dennis is much more cultured, but less confident), Roman reaches out to him, and the two become “hang buddies”, even grocery shopping together (not being alone in the store is a great comfort to Roman). The story pivots to show us that Dennis did actually know Rocky, one of many secrets withheld from Roman. Things get even more complicated when he begins dating the bubbly receptionist at Dennis’ work, Marcie (Aisling Franciosi). Can Dennis continue keeping Roman in the dark, or will Marcie somehow “spill the beans”? And what about his growing attraction for the “unattainable” twinless sibling?

The story’s dense plot works due to the considerable talents of the film’s two lead actors. Perhaps the tad more complex one is anchored by the superb rising star O’Brien (so good as Dan Ackroyd in last year’s SATURDAY NIGHT). He’s tasked with making us invested in the often volatile Roman, who is sweet as a “dems’ and dose'” bro, but can’t quite stop his fist when rage takes over. And yet, O’Brien brings lots of vulnerability to him, as Roman flails about, feeling lost without his twin, Rocky. And yes, we get to see O’Brien in a completely different persona in the flashback scenes of the departed sibling (distinctly different vocal delivery and body language). But that’s not to say that the gifted Sweeney is “treading water” around O’Brien. He also gets us cautiously on Dennis’ side, even as we know that the truth must be revealed. Sweeny shows us that he’s also more than a bit broken by his obsession and yearning for connection, while hiding behind an aloof attitude. Franciosi is the sweet, nurturing “counter-balance” to the duo as she does her best to be a cheerleader for Dennis even as her feelings for Roman emerge. But Franciosi makes her more than “the girlfriend” or even a “third wheel,” as she shows us the “steel” interior around Marcie’s candy-coated exterior. Big kudos to Ms. Graham for her work in just a couple of scenes as the “walking wounded” mother who seems to be sidelined by her all-consuming grief.

Oh, I was surprised to see that aside from co-starring, Sweeney also directed the film from his own script (his second solo feature). And he does a splendid job in twisting the narrative almost into knots, even making us wait nearly twenty minutes to see the title and opening credits. He also deftly shifts the focus from Roman (who dominates the prologue) to the quirky Dennis, who we see doing mental gymnastics to try and disguise his deceptions (love the impromptu British accent). Sweeney injects suspense into the narrative, as we wait for the big reveal and wonder about the character’s reactions. In his direction, Sweeney makes some interesting visual choices, best shown in his clever staging (split screens) of a big Halloween party sequence at Marcie’s and later in a revealing trip into a “day-glo” adult amusement center, which throws the main trio off-kilter. He also disorients us with some early graphic sex scenes before slowing the pace for more emotional intimate interactions, broken up by an “out-of-nowhere” bit of street violence. So for more adventurous filmgoers, this is a movie with strong characters, and an unpredictable script told with surprising visual confidence. That and a terrific young cast makes TWINLESS a true original.

3 Out of 4

TWINLESS is now playing in select theatres

THE ROSES – Review

Benedict Cumberbatch and Olivia Colman in THE ROSES. Photo by Jaap Buitendijk, Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2025 Searchlight Pictures All Rights Reserved.

If you are going to remake a movie, the dark comedy THE ROSES is the way to do it. The dark comedy THE ROSES proves that there is a right way to do a remake, telling the same story but in a refreshingly different way. With biting British-style humor, Benedict Cumberbatch and Olivia Colman are the perfect couple, battling or not, in this love story gone wrong.

Based on the novel, “The War of the Roses,” the original 1989 comedy/thriller of the same name starred Michael Douglas and Kathlees Turner as a successful American couple whose marriage turns sour, and then some. In that version, the romance was pretty conventional but sparks flew and the dark comedy came to the fore once the battle was on. In this one, Benedict Cumberbatch and Olivia Colman play a quirky British couple relocated to the US early on, a pair of snarky, unique individuals with a biting sense of humor. We get more of a sense of their own weird, very British humor, and creative natures, with more humor and quirky romance before they head for divorce and a showdown over the house like the original.

Centered on a couple of creatives who share that same sense of stinging humor means comedy is at the forefront from the start, not just when the battle begins. Humor is a very personal thing, individual tastes vary, and styles of humor differ culture to culture. With this couple being British, it also means that one has to have an appreciation for British humor, if not an outright love of it. The humor style is very British, although it is fully accessible American audiences, and not loaded with unfamiliar British references. The fact that these two unique individuals are so creative and off-kilter means not everyone gets them, so meeting and falling for someone who truly does get them gives this marriage something extra, with a lot more romantic spark between them.

Although the film is set in the US, the style of humor is tongue-in-cheek, snarky British. The audience gets a quick preview of the couple’s style of humor (and the film’s) in an opening scene where they are getting couple’s counseling with an American therapist. The therapist has given them an assignment to write down ten things they like about the other but these snarky souls can’t help themselves, and the “ten things I like about you” go from back-handed to pure snark. After Ivy reads her list, Theo bursts out laughing, and they laughingly trade more insults, while the therapist looks on in horror. “It’s called repartee,” Theo says, rolling his eyes. The Brits think this verbal sparring is hilarious and normal, but the American therapist recoils and ends the session. If your reaction to that scene is more like the therapist’s, you might not find this film as hilarious as I did.

The humor is snarky but less dark that the original film, although these creative people know how to bring the crazy to the fight too. Because these two are so unfiltered and satiric, they (and we) know they are the kind of couple who are made for each other, and no one else will really do. That doesn’t mean that they don’t know how to fight. Strong-willed, neither wants to lose an argument, and with two such sharp-tongued people, there are bound to be sparks and spats, even if underneath they love each and know no one else will ever get them like the other does.

THE ROSES has one the best meet-cutes ever, when architect Theo (Benedict Cumberbatch) becomes frustrated during a company meeting in a restaurant and storms away from the group – and into the kitchen. There he comes face to face with chef Ivy (Olivia Colman). The two trade quips, then their dreams, lock eyes, and fall in love. Cumberbatch and Colman do this beautifully, fully believable, romantic and charmingly funny. It’s like watching classic screwball comedy, the kind that starred Cary Grant and Katherine Hepburn, but with the personalities reversed.

Like in the original comedy, Theo and Ivy are financially successful couple but we get to see a lot more up-and-down of how they got there, which makes for a more interesting story. From the London meet-cute, we flash forward to the married couple living in California, in a modest house near a beach. Now with two kids, Ivy stays home to care the the kids, making fabulous meals for the family, while Theo pursues his architectural career. Worried that Ivy is feeling a bit unfulfilled, as her culinary efforts for the kids are getting more and more elaborate, Theo encourages her to open a little seafood restaurant in an old building nearby. She does, naming it, in her own style, “We’ve Got Crabs.” The crab shack draws only a handful of customers on the three days a week it is open (“Is it the name?” Theo wonders aloud, tongue-in-cheek), but Ivy is fine with that.

Two things happen to upset the dynamic in the marriage: a traumatic fail for Theo as he unveils a grand new building and Ivy’s crab shack getting a glowing review from a big city food critic. Suddenly the economic situation flips, as Theo, suddenly unemployed, decides to stay home with the kids while regrouping while Ivy concentrates on her suddenly successful restaurant. It’s supposed to be temporary, while Theo rebuilds his reputation and Ivy seizes an opportunity.

That shift provides the spark that leads to other changes, then conflict and resentments. The more money they have, thanks to Ivy’s widening success, the more tensions the couple have, as they are pulled in different directions. With two creative, competitive, sharp-tongued characters, sooner or later things will blow up.

Colman and Cumberbatch are absolutely marvelous in this film, with spot-on perfect verbal sparring and charmingly quirky romance. The characters are so alike, which is part of their problem, so compromise is hard. Director Jay Roach paces this growing battle perfectly, with more back-and-forth, on-and-off romance than the original, making the battle of the Roses feels fresh rather than like a retread. The humor is distinctly British and sharp, delivered by two of the most skilled professionals alive, making it both hilarious and a joy to watch. Jay Roach backs all that comic gold up with a perfect supporting cast, including Kate McKinnon and Andy Samburg, who are wonderful as the couple’s American best friends.

Writer Tony McNamara takes full advantage of the Brits in America situation, with plenty of fish-out-of-water, culture-clash humor and a bit of social commentary, especially in a hilarious scene at a shooting range.

Visually, the film is a delight as well. The film is beautifully shot by Florian Hoffmeister, highlighting the lovely California scenery, and appropriately showcasing the architecture. THE ROSES has some of the most tempting food photography I’ve seen, with one gorgeous plate or sculpted dessert after another. Another wow are the costumes Olivia Colman sports throughout, emphasizing her creative and unconventional spirit, so that one looks forward to seeing what creative outfit her Ivy will don in the next scene.

With the caveat that British humor isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, for those who enjoy that style of comedy,

THE ROSES is that rarest thing, a romantic comedy that is just an excellent film, and which hearkens back to the classic Hollywood era when romantic comedies were the best comedies. THE ROSES is the whole package, a dark romantic comedy that has plenty of comedy and romance before the mayhem begins, with a brilliantly matched lead couple, Benedict Cumberbatch and Olivia Colman, a perfectly-paced script with nearly non-stop laughs but lots of heart, wonderful supporting cast, gorgeous visuals, delightful costumes, and a perfect finish. It’s a film worth seeing more than once to laugh again, and proves that sometimes it is worth remaking a film. It also leads one to hope for more pairings between Cumberbatch and Colman.

THE ROSES opens in theaters on Friday, Aug. 29, 2025.

RATING: 4 out of 4 stars

EENIE MEANIE – Review

Now, before the Summer of 2025 officially comes to a close, how about one last ride in a suped-up classic car with the law in hot pursuit as you cause thousands of dollars in property damage (other cars included). Hold up, they’re not sneaking that final FAST & THE FURIOUS flick into the multiplex unannounced. Oh, we have that to look forward to (or perhaps dread is more accurate). It seems that SUPERMAN wasn’t the only film zipping through the streets of Cleveland last year (both needed a year’s lead time). However, you’ll not be able to hear the screeching tires through Dolby Theatre’s speakers since this is a premiere streaming movie. And its title harkens back to the classic nursery rhyme, making us wonder if catching “by the toe” is possible when the driver’s nickname is EENIE MEANIE.

The story starts with a flashback when 14-year-old Edie defied the law (not the first time) by meeting her folks at a neighborhood “watering hole” and driving the sloshed pair home in the family car. Flash forward 17 years, as adult Edie (Samara Weaving) is partying a bit hard herself at the bachelorette party of her BBF “Babygirl” (Kyanna Simone). Edie’s got a full day ahead of her and starts it by waking up late, earning the ire of her boss at the bank. Naturally, a gang of crooks barges in, with one thug conking her on the head with his gun (which Edie tried to grab away from him). She wakes up in the doctor’s office, who tells her that she and her unborn child will be fine. WTF, pregnant?! Could it have happened during a brief “visit” with her now ex, bungling petty criminal John (Karl Glusman)? Now, Edie’s got to get to her junior college classes, but she goes past her bus stop in order to confront John at his sketchy apartment complex. When she arrives, he’s getting worked over by some “legbreakers”. Ignoring her first impulse to “dash”, she rescues him with the pair escaping in a stolen car. John brings her in on his latest scheme (she doesn’t give him her big news), which “goes South”. In order to cool things down, the duo begs forgiveness of the local crime boss (who has a soft spot for Edie, dubbing her “Eenie Meanie”), Nico (Andy Garcia). Seems that John has cost Nico a big “earner,” and the replacement fee is three million bucks! But Nico has a plan for them. The local casino’s having a big poker tournament with a three-million-dollar cash prize. No, John’s no good with cards, but Edie’s great with cars. Huh? Turns out that the cash prize will be put inside a classic Dodge Charger, which Edie will have to drive out of the crowded casino. The backup crew is all set, but can they possibly pull off this big “broad daylight” score, especially if John “gums up the works”? And when will Edie drop the big “baby bomb” on that doofus?

In the title role, Weaving does an engaging job of making many action film clichés feel fresh. Aside from putting her own “spin” on the “wheel man” role, she conveys the inner struggle of a young woman at a true crossroads. She’s got to leave her fun and footloose twenties and really plunge into adulthood as a prelude to motherhood. And though life has thrown a lot, a whole lot, at her, Weaving never makes Edie a victim, even as she talks about being put “in the system” and later, in the “joint”. I look forward to her future films (especially a sequel to READY OR NOT). She dominates the screen so confidently that it’s tough for co-star Glusman to shine. And though he thoroughly dives into his role, John’s more than a bit shallow. He’s a dimbulb for the first hour or so, getting naked or beaten up (or both) in order to liven up the pace and provide some cheap laughs. I’m sure Glusman could make him more sweet and endearing, like a destructive puppy, but the script doesn’t provide that. Which causes us to actively root against him and Edie getting back together. Garcia is very compelling and quite funny as the aging but still tough-as-nails “mini-kingpin”, whose gravelly voice goes up an octave when talking to his surrogate daughter Edie. Her real papa is played by the always entertaining Steve Zahn in the opening sequence, frantically warning Edie about a police stop, and later as we see him with his “start over” family facing a very different future. There are also several gifted comic actors in smaller roles. First there’s Randall Park, whose fate sets the big caper in motion, then Mike O’Malley as Nico’s sardonic best bud/caregiver, and Marshawn Lynch as the flashy getaway driver rival to Edie.

This film comes from writer/director Shawn Simmons, who’s truly going “all out” for his feature film directing debut as he mixes comedy, wild car stunts, and a touch of character drama. And some of it works very well, especially in creating the unique character of a woman “wheel man” in the same league as BABY DRIVER and DRIVE. He also makes excellent use of the grimy, mean-looking streets of Cleveland. Yet, much of the material feels worn and listless. What doesn’t really help is the story’s radical change in tone during the flawed final moments when a major character almost becomes an evil clone of the person we’d seen in the previous 80 minutes (I thought of that classic Trek tale “Mirror, Mirror”). A “tacked-on” rose-colored epilogue just doesn’t fit with that big reveal. The racing fans will enjoy seeing some of their favorite “muscle cars” careening past the squad cars, but aside from Ms. Weaving, there’s little that really puts the “pedal to the metal” in the uneven exploits of EENIE MEANIE.

2 Out of 4

EENIE MEANIE streams exclusively on Hulu beginning on August 22, 2025