Caroline Williams began her career in Texas, and quickly established herself in the Texas movie marketplace doing commercials, industrial films and voiceover work. She soon found herself busy with roles in such films THE LEGEND OF BILLIE JEAN (1985) and GETTING EVEN (1985). After her star-making turn as Stretch in 1986’s THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE Pt 2., Caroline moved to LA and appeared in films such as THE STEPFATHER 2 (1989), DAYS OF THUNDER (1990), and THE GRINCH WHO STOLE CHRISTMAS (2000)
In her latest, TEN MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT, Caroline Williams returns to the DJ booth for the first time since THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE Pt 2. Williams plays Amy Marlowe, a veteran late night radio host on the eve of forced retirement trapped inside the station by a violent storm after being bitten by a rabid bat.
Caroline Williams took the time to talk to We Are Movie Geeks about her career and about TEN MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT.
Interview conducted by Tom Stockman January 15th, 2021
Tom Stockman: Hi Caroline. I still have my THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE Pt. 2 poster that you kissed in 1990. Your lipstick marks are still on it
Caroline Williams: Wow. That’s wonderful! That’s some long-lasting lipstick.
TS: Let’s talk about your new movie TEN MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT. I watched it the other night with my girlfriend and then I showed her THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE Pt. 2 because she had never seen that. It was interesting watching those two back-to-back.
CW: And good that you watched it with a woman because there is a woman perspective in those movies movie and that’s always interesting.
TS: It was. And there are parallels between these two characters, Amy from your new film and of course Stretch.
CW: The parallel is that they were both DJs, but the differences are extremely broad. Stretch wanted to get out of head-banging music and do something real and all Amy wants is to play head-banging music.
TS: And of course Amy is looking at involuntary retirement from her lifelong career. There’s really a lot more depth to TEN MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT then you might notice at first glance. It’s a movie that makes you think.
CW: It’s very unpredictable and it takes you in directions that other horror film don’t traditionally take you in. I think it’s smarter and more sophisticated and I think it addresses a lot about the nature of time, and the nature of looking at our lives retrospectively. It takes on a lot of subjects that generally I think a lot of filmmakers think may be too serious to address in a horror film, but director Erik Bloomquist and his brother and co-writer Carson Bloomquist were completely unafraid to take that on and we got a really unusual movie because of it.
TS: How do you get cast in this? It seems written for you. Did you have to audition?
CW: Well that’s a great story, which you will love, and it’s about women in business in a way as well. This role of Amy was first offered to Barbara Crampton . She has been a wife and mother for a long time as have I. She got herself re-established in the movie YOU’RE NEXT a while ago and she’s really been going from strength to strength for a very long time now. It took me a little longer. I’ve only been out on my own, with my kids grown, for the last four years. That’s given me the freedom to concentrate on moving forward. Barbara was offered the role but she was going off to film CASTLE FREAK in Europe and was unable to do the film. She told Erik she thought the script read like it was written for Caroline Williams and that he should approach me. Erik sent me the script and we had a chance to chat and I was on board immediately. The screenplay played to every strength that I believe I have as an actress, but it also played every single challenge that I have wanted to take on. An opportunity like this just had not been there recently, to be able to live the life of a character in one film. I got to have the lead role and I was on screen nearly the entire. It was just a very rewarding experience. I absolutely loved doing it.
TS: Tell me a little bit more about your character Amy. She hosts a call-in radio show. Did she also play music?
CW: I think so. It’s just that the action moves so quickly in the film and there is a lot of great music in the film. There’s music by Wednesday the 13th and Bury Your Dead, and other great artists. I hope they put out a soundtrack CD for the film. I think it’s really outstanding. The action moves so quickly in the film that she just doesn’t have any music to play.
TS: That heavy metal soundtrack. Is that your kind of music?
CW: I have a broad range of musical styles that I love. I’ve been around for a long time. When I was a kid, the Beatles were a big thing and the Beach boys and Paul Revere and the Raiders. I traveled through everything from the Bee Gees through 90s music like Chemical Romance and there are contemporary artists today that I like and I know. Iused to hang out at the Whiskey and the Viper room. What else can I say?
TS: Were there some physical challenges making this movie TEN MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT?
CW: It has a lot of physical action. It’s one of those things that I love about horror. Horror is action-adventure by definition. I loved playing that role. It was like being a kid in a playground.
TS: Do you live in Texas still or are you in LA now?
CW: I’ve lived in LA since 1986.
TS: When was TEN MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT filmed?
CW: It was filmed about a year and a half ago.
TS: Your TEN MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT co-star Nick Tucci passed away about a year ago. Had he been sick on the set?
CW: No, Nick did not want to share any of that with anybody. He wanted to continue to work and he dedicated himself wholeheartedly to The film and his performance was outstanding.
TS: So it was a shock to you when he passed?
CW: I was stunned. Very few people knew.
Where was TEN MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT filmed?
CW: We filmed it at a little radio station in a town in Connecticut called Willamantic. It was a fully operational radio station. A lot of it is on auto-pilot a lot of the time. Our Director Erik Bloomquest had some interviews there before . They made us welcome and let us shoot from 6 PM in the evening until 6 AM the next morning. It was a struggle sometimes to keep going all through the night but everybody did the rhythm turnaround thing that you do and we all had a great time.
TS: It’s coming out on do you DVD and Blu-ray soon. Were you involved in any of the extras?
CW: I’m not sure when it’s coming out.
TS: Will you put participate in a commentary track?
CW: We haven’t done anything like that yet. I assume when it’s time to do that, they will tell us.
TS: TEN MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT did play at some theaters and drive-ins back in the fall.
CW: The Harkins Movie Theaters chain, which are indoor theaters, played it at four different theaters in Arizona and they four-walled us.
TS: Did you get to attend any of those screenings?
CW: Yes, I got to see the film for the very first time in Providence Rhode Island with the full sound and it was extraordinary. I had Erik sitting next to me. It was wonderful.
TS: I wish it had played in St. Louis.
CW: It did play in all 50 states. Sometimes pop-ups, sometimes drive-ins. We devoted our promotional efforts to the East Coast because there were so many festivals and events concentrated in that area . I quarantined in Connecticut for two weeks and we started our tour. It was an incredible experience and one that I recommend it to any independent filmmaker if you want your movie to be seen.
TS: I did see THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE Pt 2 at the theater when it was new. Are you surprised at the depth of the cult following that movie has?
CW: I’m really not because the film was directed by Tobe Hooper and Tobe was an innovator and created a piece of cinematic history with the first Texas Chainsaw. So curiosity alone was going to bring people out to see the sequel, but it’s such a weird inversion of everything that the first one was. Tobe always said that the original was meant to be a comedy. He didn’t understand while why people didn’t embrace it as such. He thought it was funny as hell. That’s part of the reason I think that he decided to create THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE Pt 2 in the way that he did and it just took everybody by surprise.
TS: Yeah I think a generation younger than me, maybe 20 years younger than me like part two because they discovered it on video and is gory and it’s funny . I think it has as many fans as the first one. What’s your next project
CW: Well, the projects that are listed as “in development“ on my IMDB page just aren’t real. Anybody can make a contribution to the IMDb page.
TS: They also say on IMDB that you’re 5 foot six. I would’ve guessed you were taller. You certainly photographed like a taller woman.
CW: I’m 5 foot seven, but in the world of movie actors that’s tall. Most of the male stars are short so the women tend to be even shorter. When I go on the IMDb page to attempt to edit or alter things, they won’t accept my edit. I’ve just given up.
TS: Yes, they have you listed as costarring in SMILE in 1975. I watched it once and tried to spot you but you were not in it.
CW: No, I’m not in SMILE, but I can’t tell you how many people bring the poster to me and ask me to sign it. I told him I’m not in the film, but they want to be to sign anyway. But right now, I do not know what my next project is. I want to choose carefully. A role like TEN MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT might happen, if you’re lucky, two or three times in a lifetime. I want to wait and see what the reaction and the response to it is. I have been approached by filmmakers who want me to commit now but I want to wait and see how this movie is received and see what kind of offers come after that. I’d love to be able to find something that is as rewarding and wonderful experience is this one. Erik and Carson Bloomquist were such talented filmmakers to work with so I’m taking keeping my fingers crossed. So I don’t know what to expect for my next project but I know it will be awesome.
TS: I know it will be awesome as well. Good luck with TEN MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT and all of your future projects.
Sean Patrick Flanery was raised outside of Houston, Texas. His first role in Hollywood was a Kellog’s Corn Pops commercial starring alongside Paul Walker. In 1992, he landed the title role in George Lucas’ The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles Since then, Flanery has been in numerous films and TV shows, including POWDER, SAW3, SUICIDE KINGS, and the runaway cult hit THE BOONDOCK SAINTS. Off camera, Flanery is a high ranking martial artist having earned his black belt in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu from the Renzo Gracie lineage in 2008 and trains regularly when his film schedule allows. In his new film BORN A CHAMPION, which he wrote, Flanery plays Mickey Kelley, one of the first American black belts in Brazilian jiu-jitsu, who gets pulled away from everything he loves and into an unsanctioned MMA tournament.
Sean Patrick Flanery took the time to talk to We Are Movie Geeks about his career and BORN A CHAMPION.
Interview conducted by Tom Stockman December 15th, 2020
Tom Stockman: I watched your movie BORN A CHAMPION recently and really enjoyed it.
Sean Patrick Flanery: Thanks a lot.
TS: I found it exciting and very well done.I like movies where I feel after watching them, that I have learned something.
SPF: What did you learn?
TS: I feel like I learned about this sport of Brazilian jiu-jitsu. Technical things such as the rules and the lack of rules, and all about these illegal tent matches that they have out in the desert of Dubai. Is that a real thing?
SPF: It is yes. The film is a place where my heart has been living for quite a while.
TS: And I learned about you seeing this film. I didn’t know you had written BORN A CHAMPION until I started watching it.
SPF: Is that right?
TS: Where did you get the idea for the story?
SPF: Being a martial artist, there are a couple of forums out there were fighters congregate and chat. One is called MMA Underground. You have UFC fighters and some pretty big names in the sport post and discuss things there. I wrote a story and posted it there about a girl I met when I was a young kid when I was first studying martial arts. It got a pretty good response and immediately after that, I wrote a second story which I did not post to the forum. I immediately decided that I needed to make it into a film. I wrote that story in 2007, which gives you an idea of how long it takes to go from story to final film. We shot it in the summer of 2019 so it’s been a long gestation process.
TS: Was Mickey Kelley, the character you play in the film, based on a true fighter?
SPF: The story is based on a lot of truths but Mickey Kelley is completely fictional, but there are a number of pretty strong truths in the film. For example RAW Champ. RAW is an acronym for Real American Wrestling. It was an academy out in San Pedro. So there’s a lot of authentic elements to the story, but no actual Mickey Kelley, but having said that, there are a lot of Mickey Kelleys out there.
TS: Did you do all your own fights and stunts in the film?
SPF: I sure did.
TS: Were there any injuries during the making of this film?
SPF: No, no injuries. This is something I do on a daily basis so in a way, it was another day at the office but it was a joy and a pleasure to do it in front of a camera.
TS: When did you start fighting?
SPF: I started in martial arts when I was nine years old. A lot of people talk about being inspired by Bruce Lee for getting into martial arts. My inspiration was actually Elvis Presley. I saw him singing Suspicious Minds on the Vegas stage and he was wearing a jumpsuit that looked like a kimono and was doing these karate kicks. I asked my dad if he was doing karate. My dad, who had been a Golden Gloves boxer, said that yes, Elvis had trained with Ed Parker in Kempo Karate. I just thought I would love to do that. We did not come from a lot of money but one day I saw a girl in white pants pushing a bicycle with a flat tire. She was carrying her karate gi top in the basket, and I followed her as she went into this little karate studio that was next to a Piggly Wiggly Supermarket. I went in there and that’s how I got into martial arts. I followed a girl, just like everything else in my life.
TS: When you were growing up, were you a movie buff? Did you like the movies that star actors like Bruce Lee and Chuck Norris?
SPF: Absolutely, but I’ve always been a story buff. Some of the best stories I’ve ever heard were firsthand stories from my grandfather and my dad. We all loved movies. John Ford movies. John Wayne films, All the way through Clint Eastwood and Bruce Lee and Chuck Norris, all of that. It was a huge part of my upbringing as well as other films. I liked all the big WWII conflict stories like MIDWAY. I would see those with my dad and they had a profound impact on me.
TS: Speaking of MIDWAY, there was a remake of that last year costarring Dennis Quaid, who is your costar in BORN A CHAMPION. Talk about working with Dennis Quaid.
SPF: Dennis Quaid is one of the very best people I’ve ever had the opportunity to work with. Through and through, on the set and off, that dude is 100% authentic and a perfect example of a gentleman. I had a wonderful time working with him. He was sort of the conscience of the piece. I don’t think the film would’ve worked nearly as well without him.
TS: He’s one of my favorite contemporary actors as well. I think he’s one of those actors that just elevates everything he’s in.
SPF: You’re absolutely right.
TS: Your nemesis Marco in this movie is played by a big charismatic guy named Edson Barboza. Talk about him a little bit.
SPF: Edson is a very high-ranked UFC fighter. I had him in my mind when I wrote this script. I was trying to get in contact with him and found him on Facebook. He didn’t respond to me at first, but I sent his wife a message that I had written a story and wanted to cast her husband and wanted to see if he would be interested in reading it. She responded, and then he responded. He is a consummate professional and can be scary looking, but he could not be more docile in person. He was so worried about anyone getting injured. He’s a true friend to this day.
TS: Yes, and he has presence. I can see him getting other villain roles in films based on his performance in BORN A CHAMPION. You said you wrote the screenplay in 2007. You also wrote a novel called Jane Two. Was that after you had written the BORN A CHAMPION screenplay?
SPF: I wrote the novel right around the same time. I accumulate little pieces I called “thought trash”. Anytime I have a component of a story, I write it on whatever is handy, be it a candy wrapper or the cardboard at the bottom of a box of donuts. So I was writing both of those about the same time, but the book actually came out in 2016, so it beat the film by three years.
TS: Do you want to write more?
SPF: The storytelling aspect is something that I enjoy thoroughly. From the inception, to the idea, to seeing it realized visually and then combining it with the musical element. When I look back, every single pronounced moment that has happened in my past has a soundtrack. You could be driving down the road and listening to a popular song, or you smell the chlorophyll in the air from freshly cut grass and that may trigger a memory. Trying to re-create that combination I find ultimately thrilling and therapeutic at the same time. If the public consumes it, or digests it, and ends up with a smile on their face, then maybe someone will ask you to do it again. I do enjoy it and I hope to write another film again.
TS: I can tell by watching this film that you love what you do. You are a busy guy. Where do you teach jujitsu?
SPF: I actually started my first martial arts Academy in Los Angeles in 2003. I moved to Texas about three years ago when my parents became sick so started a Brazilian jujitsu Academy here in Houston. I teach every single day. Coming up later this month I am commentating a huge event for Submission Grappling in Houston, so this aspect of my life takes up a lot of time, even though my bread-and-butter is the film and entertainment industry . This helped my sanity when I’m in-between films and waiting for the phone to ring.
TS: I met you at eight or nine years ago at a movie convention here in St. Louis. Did you do a lot of those and do you miss doing those?
SPF: I do. Being in the film industry you don’t get immediate feedback, which is like nourishment for the soul. I love being in films, but the feedback is delayed. The boom operator holding the mic is not paying attention to your performance. They are too busy focusing on their job. So at the end of the scene, you may have thought that you poured your soul out, but the director says “cut” and everyone just walks over to the next set. You’re kind of left wondering how you did. Going to these conventions is when you really get the first-hand experience of the viewer. To me they are invaluable. I absolutely love those moments. Being on panels at those conventions are some of my favorite moments from being in the entertainment industry. You have a crowd of people who happen to love something that you did, or hate something that you did, but they want to hear you talk about it. You get that first-hand experience.
TS: At the con where I met you, you and David Della Rocco were on stage together. Norman Reedus was supposed to show up and join you guys but he never made it there the whole weekend. Do you remember that one?
SPF: I do. Anytime Norman has a weekend free and I do as well, we would like to meet up in a city for one of those. We have been buddies since 1998, but we actually first met in 1994. But that has happened on more than one occasion where he has not been able to show up. Sometimes filming gets delayed, and that’s what happens when you’re on a popular show like he was (The Walking Dead).
Norman Reedus and Sean Patrick Flanery in THE BOONDOCK SAINTS
TS: Are you surprised at the depth of the cult following that THE BOONDOCK SAINTS still has? I’ve seen guys with THE BOONDOCK SAINTS tattoos.
SPF: I think you’re always surprised when something takes on that big of a life. People see maybe one percent of the things that we have done throughout our careers so when something is what they call a cult hit, and it starts growing and it seems to never stop growing, it’s mesmerizing and astounding. You’d love to be able to replicate that recipe and make something like that every day. I’m blown away and honored to have been part of something that inspires somebody to get a tattoo of it. It’s flattering.
TS: What’s your next project Sean?
SPF: I’ve got one project in the works but I can’t really talk about much right now. An announcement is going to be made soon about a pretty cool TV show that is coming up on Amazon prime. I can’t say too much, but I am going to be on that.
TS: Well maybe we can talk again when you’re working on that. Good luck with BORN A CHAMPION. It’s a terrific film.
Gerard Bush and Christopher Renz are former advertising creative executives who founded their agency Bush/Renz in 2008. The duo has a long and successful history of viral and effective short form marketing and entertainment. Their debut feature ANTEBELLUM, is about a woman who finds herself trapped in a horrifying reality involving slavery.
Gerard Bush and Christopher Renz took the time to talk to We Are Movie Geeks about their careers and about how ANTEBELLUM came to be.
Interview conducted by Tom Stockman January 13th, 2021
Tom Stockman: I recently watched your movie ANTEBELLUM and found it very entertaining. Gerard, I heard that this story was inspired by a nightmare that you had.
Gerard Bush; Yes it was shortly before we moved to LA . I was having a lot of weird dreams at that time. This particular nightmare felt different. It felt like this woman Eden was so desperate for help that she was screaming across dimensions. That’s how we got the original idea.
TS: I’m curious about what you did as soon as you woke up from your dream. Did you write things down? Did you call someone and tell them about it?
GB: I’m very respectful about dreams and I get a lot of inspiration from them. I usually keep a notepad next to the bed but in this case, I didn’t. I had my phone and I was contemplating whether or not to open the phone because I felt like if I did, that would keep me from going back to sleep. At first I decided to just wait and write it all down in the morning but something inside me said not to do that and I’m so happy I didn’t. I opened the note app on my phone and wrote everything down.
TS: There’s a big twist in ANTEBELLUM so I don’t want to talk about the story too much, but was that twist in your dream?
GB: Yes. That’s what boggles my mind. The nightmare followes the whole story right down to the sign and everything. That’s why this woman was so desperate to reach for help. I wondered if this was happening in the future or an SOS from the past.
TS: Christopher, how did you get involved in this project?
Christopher Renz: Gerard and I have been together as writing and directing partners and also as life partners for the past 12 years. I was on board from the morning he woke up and came to the kitchen and told me about the nightmare We discussed it and it was such an incredible story that we wrote it as a short story that same day.
GB: We wrote the short story with the idea that it was just going to be that. We had no intention at that point that it was going to be a film.
TS: It’s definitely high-concept. Was this a difficult story to describe to studios and investors to get funding for?
GB: It’s a difficult movie to describe because when describing it because you just want them to experience it the way audiences would experience it. We were pleasantly surprised that there was a bidding war from almost all of the major studios.
TS: Let’s talk about these plantation scenes that make up part of the film. Where were those filmed?
CR: Those were filmed in Louisiana at the Evergreen Plantation. That’s also where DJANGO UNCHAINED was filmed. It’s an oddly beautiful place considering the history.
TS: Who owns this plantation now and what do they do there?
CR: The lady that owns this particular plantation is very dedicated to educating people about the enslavement of black people and what that meant for us as a country and as a society and how it’s still rears its ugly head in so many crevices in corners of the country even today. She told us about some of the neighboring plantations. When you see people taking tours of those plantation, they are virtually all white but I don’t want to make assumptions about what those people are thinking or what motivates them to take those tours, but some of what I saw didn’t feel so good. We liked what Miss Jane, the owner of Evergreen, was doing and how respectable she was. Outside of the aesthetics, that was one of the main reasons we chose that location. Some of the other plantations felt so dirty and wrong. People went through the slave quarters and then went into the gift shop.
TS: Do they have a gift shop at Evergreen?
CR: No, not at Evergreen. There’s a whole part of Louisiana there called Plantation Row.
TS:Was there any discomfort or tension between the white actors playing the plantation owners and workers and the black actors playing the slaves?
GB: Not at all. Everybody that was part of the film went into this project with the best of intentions and motivations. We were very respectful of one another and engaged in in-depth conversations prior to even getting on set. It was important to us that we had a set where everyone was there for all of the right reasons. We were so fortunate to have an all-star cast that was really motivated to stay true to the script.
TS: How did you keep things historically accurate?
GB: First and foremost, we are both history buffs and we wanted to make sure that everything that we were including in the film had some value in terms of historical contacts even right down to the enslaved people whispering what is the national black anthem; Lift Every Voice. Some people who might take just a cursory overview, and not really look at the film, may think they see things that don’t feel appropriate for the period, but it’s not until you see the entire film that you understand that everything we did was quite deliberate.
TS: You tell your story very visually, which I always like. What were your backgrounds prior to becoming filmmakers?
CR: When we got together 12 years ago, our intention was to always become filmmakers. Within the first three days of being together, we were writing a short story about aliens. We didn’t want to move to Hollywood on a wing and a prayer so we spent the next 10 years honing our skills with the advertising shop that we had started, Bush/Renz. There we worked with clients such as Porsche and Harry Winston before we really went in headfirst with environmental issues, social justice, and politics. We were able to use a lot of the concepts of the writing and filmmaking that we had done on behalf of luxury brands. We then applied that visual identity, one that had became really unique to Bush/Renz to the political and activist work that we were doing. That just translated into the filmmaking work and ANTEBELLUM and others moving forward.
TS: Explain to me how the pair of you work as co-directors.
GB: It’s funny because I don’t know, and Christopher doesn’t know, anything else because we have only written and directed together for the past twelve years. We’re not the same person but we have shared values in those places that are most important to a creative process. What makes it work is that we are very respectful of the other person‘s perspective, point of view, and how meaningful that is in terms of a contribution to what we are trying to do as a whole. There is never a time on set that we are not making those decisions together. The DGA says “one Director one vision” but Janelle Monáe ended up buying the entire cast and TScrew T-shirts dedicated to Chris and I that said “two directors one vision“, So we are like Siamese twins in that way.
TS: I remember seeing trailers for ANTEBELLUM at the theater. It came out in spring right about the time the theaters are closing down because of Covid. Were you guys ever able to go to a big premiere of this movie with an audience?
CR: No. We had screenings with people and we had a drive-in premiere that was incredibly well done. It was on the rooftop of The Grove here in Los Angeles. But it was not the same as being in a movie theater and having that communal experience. We designed and made ANTEBELLUM to be experienced in a theater with a group of strangers in the dark. It didn’t happen that way obviously with Covid, but we felt an urgency about getting the film out given the circumstance and relevance and how prescient some who had seen it thought that it was for the time. What we have learned is that Antebellum is the sixth most looked-up word in 2020 because of our film. It wasn’t a word that was in heavy rotation. Here’s a film that pierces pop culture and the collective consciousness of the country here when we are in the middle of a global pandemic and what feels like the end of times, We are really satisfied with the outcome, all things considered.
TS: What were some of the biggest challenges in making ANTEBELLUM?
GB: This is our first feature so there was a bit of a learning curve but we are quick learners. We got there. I think that making a movie is not an easy thing. It’s difficult. You have to fight for your vision throughout the whole process, from the script notes all the way through the final edit.
CR: We learned a lot throughout this experience, and will be able to use that experience in our next film which is called RAPTURE.
TS: When you’re making that one, let’s talk again. Good luck with your future projects.
CR & GB: Thanks a lot
ANTEBELLUM is currently available on Streaming and on DVD, Blu-ray and 4K.
THE PENNY BLACKscreens as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival November 5th – 22nd.Ticket information for the virtual screening can be found HEREThe feature is followed by a Q&A with director Joe Saunders, producer Alexander Greer, and subject Will Cassayd-Smith.
The twisty, head-spinning investigative thriller “The Penny Black” begins when Will, the estranged son of a conman, receives a stamp collection putatively worth between $1 and $2 million from his enigmatic Russian neighbor, Roman, who asks him to hold the stamps while he’s on a two-week trip. Far from a close friend, Will knows nothing of Roman beyond his first name. In fact, the sole basis of their relationship is a conversation that the two had while smoking outside their mutual LA apartment building while a drunken Roman downed canned liquor. The filmmakers hear this outlandish tale from Will at a dinner with mutual friends shortly after he receives the stamps, and they ask to start filming to see what occurs. As it happens, Roman is absent for far longer than two weeks, and after several months pass, Will leaves the apartment building to move in with his girlfriend, taking the stamps with him. Questions abound: Given that Will has no contact information for Roman — not even a last name — what will he do with the stamps, which are in fact quite valuable? Is he potentially in any danger? The film then takes another whiplash turn when a significant piece of the stamp collection goes missing, forcing the filmmakers to re-examine Will — a slippery, elusive character throughout — and his capacity for honesty. Los Angeles magazine writes: “‘The Penny Black’ tells an impossible-to-look-away-from story.”
Director Joe Saunders took the time to talk to We Are Movie Geeks about PENNY BLACK
Interview conducted by Tom Stockman November 12th 2020
Tom Stockman: First explain what the Penny Black of your film’s title is.
Joe Saunders: The Penny Black is referring to the first adhesive postage stamp in the world. It came out in 1840 in Great Britain.
TS: But that’s not what your movie is really about.
JS: No.
TS: Did you have an interest in stamps before you made the film?
JS: I did not. I collected baseball cards and other things when I was a kid so I was familiar with the collecting process but no, I never got into stamps.
TS: I think a lot of stamp collectors are dying off.
JS: They are and it’s kind of interesting because when we were shooting this, we went to a lot of stamp collector shows and conventions and there were a few people there that were very suspicious of us. They wanted to make sure that we were promoting stamp collecting as an appealing hobby. There was one guy in particular we interviewed separately, but none of that made it in to the final film because he got a bit hostile and paranoid about making sure that we put stamps in the best light.
TS: Let’s talk about Will, who is at the center of your film. How did you meet Will and how did you come to make a film about him?
JS: I met with him through Alex, my producing partner, for this documentary. He knew Will from a roommate in college, so there was no direct relationship. I had just moved to LA and was having brunch with Alex and a group he knew and Will was one of those people and he told the table this rather outlandish story about his neighbor who came over and gave him this million dollar stamp collection. I did not know him well and I tend to trust people I don’t know. I didn’t know of any reason why he would lie. The way he told his story was kind of sensational and I questioned it. So I asked him if I could come over with my camera the next day and film this is as small LA weird type of story. It obviously blew up into the much bigger thing.
TS: I was going to ask you how well you knew Will before the filming began. Frankly, he comes off as very unforthcoming and I think untrustworthy. Why do you think Will gave you such intimate access at first?
JS: At first I think it was just the novelty of being asked to be filmed on camera. Personally, I would just freeze up if someone put a camera on me because I am just too aware of myself to behave naturally. I think Will is the opposite. He revels in attention, so when I put the camera on him, he wasn’t exactly acting like he would off-camera. There was more performance involved and I think he really liked the idea that somebody wanted to make a documentary about him. That novelty wore off though over the years that we spent shooting this. And that may be because he simply got tired of us filming him all the time and it became a burden or there was a specific reason he wanted us to stop filming. That could be that he did something with these stamps or he really did not want to find his neighbor that we were trying to find.
TS: At what point during the making of this film did red flags go off where you thought maybe Will was not on the up and up?
JS: It was the moment when we noticed that there was a stamp book missing. He was always a little flippant with everything so it was actually a challenge editing him into a cohesive character because every time we would film him, he would give us so many different sides of himself. It would have been really easy to go to extremes and show him as either a Saint or a complete devil. Trying to get that balance of representing him as we saw him was pretty difficult. When the stamp book went missing, all of our fears were confirmed in a way because we always thought he would do something with the stamps so when we realized that that book was gone, we immediately assumed that he had. We started looking back at all of our interviews with him and everything he had said and how he had turned into not being wanting to be filmed anymore. It made that look a lot more suspicious.
TS: Was the Penny Black stamp in the book that went missing?
JS: There was a Penny Black stamp still in the collection but it was impossible to know if that Penny Black was the previous Penny Black.
TS: Who was Will’s father and how does that relationship fit into your film?
JS: Will’s father was a con artist who ripped off several people by selling them counterfeit art. That was one of the things told to us by Will in one interview. But when the stamp book went missing, we started wondering if anything he had told us was true. He never found his neighbor so we still didn’t know exactly how he got the stamp collection and then the story of his dad came into question. We did some research on that and we were able to find some documents from the Getty Museum that had him listed as an art dealer that they should not deal with. Christie’s Auction House had him blackballed. We also found document of a court case involving him and two other people concerning counterfeit art. And I found a letter Will’s father wrote in a Christian magazine in England about serving jail time and repenting. It was really weird.
TS: Did you make any attempts to try to contact him for an interview?
JS: We wanted to and we asked Will several times if we could and he always told us no. It was a situation where he was the subject of this documentary and we needed his cooperation so there were certain barriers that he put up that we couldn’t cross. We thought that though we couldn’t cross them at that time, once we got what we needed from Will, maybe we could go back and interview his dad and talk to his mom more and try to confirm some of his stories. We shot this film over a period of five years on and off and eventually we just stopped filming and needed to do something with our project. So we edited it together and had our film.
TS: It’s an interesting film. At one point you asked him point-blank if he has been honest with you. What did you think of his answer?
JS: I think he is someone who enjoys being kind of mysterious and he enjoys keeping people questioning him. It gives him this little sense of control and power. So I don’t think he was always honest with us but it’s really impossible to tell.
TS: At one point in your film you note that Will was becoming less and less available. Then you went and look for this Roman guy yourselves. How much time did you spend looking for him?
JS: Once we knew that he was in a certain neighborhood in Los Angeles, we probably spent close to a year looking for him. Alex and I have jobs so it was hardly anything we could do 24/7. The private investigator was getting kind of sick of us. She wasn’t getting paid.
TS: The gal on the moped?
JS: Yes. But she wasn’t doing a lot of that work so Alex and I would have to go out looking for him. We tried to do it intelligently. We figured he had a job and he would come home during certain hours so if we could we would go there very early in the morning and look around but it was kind of like a needle in a haystack because we didn’t know what he looked like. So we would look for someone smoking and if we didn’t see anything we might leave and come back later in the week or maybe during the hours coming home from work. When we did finally find him, it was a rush.
TS: Do you think that was really Roman? The guy in the diner at the end of the film? Do you think that was the guy who gave me Will the stamps?
JS: I do yes. It’s interesting that you would ask that question though, did you have suspicions?
TS: I did. It just seemed a little too neatly tied together, especially the scene at the diner where he and Will are so friendly with each other and Will gives him back the stamp collection and Roman doesn’t even ask about any missing stamps. Do you think that the stamp collection was the one stolen from Edmund Cherry, who had his collection stolen in Arizona?
JS: It was impossible to determine that. Edmund Cherry’s niece Bonnie didn’t have any direct evidence and was unable to pinpoint any stamps that were in the collection that were his. Her stepsister, who we also interviewed but did not want to be on film, is certain that it was Edmund Cherry’s collection and on our Facebook page, she keeps messaging us saying “You know these are ours, Joe. You know those are ours“.
TS: The niece said that the FBI has been investigating the theft of Edmund Cherry’s collection. Do you know if the FBI ever contacted Will or Roman?
JS: I doubt it. We actually contacted the police department in Arizona who were investigating the missing stamp collection. We went down there with Will and Sherrill the private detective. They gave us the entire case file on that theft, though part of it was redacted. There really wasn’t much in there. We talked to a woman who owns a motel who had recovered one of the binders from that stolen collection and she was kind of shady too. That didn’t lead anywhere either. We did try to talk to the FBI because we thought that since the case was so old, the case file had become public. But with the specific case that we were dealing with, they either weren’t allowed to share files with us, or they didn’t have them.
TS: Do you think the missing book of stamps and the boat at the end of your film are related?
JS: I don’t know. It seems so strange to me that he would just suddenly have a boat. He claims it belongs to his mom, but she doesn’t use it.
TS: It was a great way to end the film. It was almost comical.
JS: Yes, my brother watched the film and commented that the ending reminded him of OCEAN’S 11 with the guys on walking off smiling at each other for having pulled off the con. I remember the moment when Alex told me Will had just bought this boat. It was crazy. Just unbelievable.
TS: Yes it was. Have you shown THE PENNY BLACK at other film festivals?
JS: Yes it premiered at Slamdance just before Covid canceled all of the other festivals. I got to go and watch it with an audience which was great. That’s why you do these things. It’s been unfortunate to have a festival run in 2020.
TS: What’s your next project?
JS: I’ve been working on a documentary about warm-up comedians which again has been affected by Covid, but we’ll see. Other than that, I do a lot of animated projects. Alex and I have been working on this comedy talk show series that takes place in stranger’s cars during rush hour traffic which again has been affected by Covid, but hopefully we can come back to that.
TS: Thanks a lot for talking to me about your film
FINDING YINGYINGscreens as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival November 5th – 22nd.Ticket information for the virtual screening can be found HEREThe feature is followed by a Q&A with director Jiayan “Jenny” Shi and co-producer Shilin Sun.
“Finding Yingying” chronicles the search for Yingying Zhang, a 26-year-old Chinese student who had only recently arrived at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2017 when she disappeared. The filmmaker, Jenny Shi, also a Chinese expatriate, was studying journalism at Northwestern University and volunteered to help in the search. When Yingying’s family members and boyfriend arrived in the States to engage in the hunt for the missing woman, Shi served as translator and guided them through the alien landscape. By recording events as they transpired, Shi captures the unfolding narrative from a particularly privileged and empathetic position. A moving and expertly told true-crime story, “Finding Yingying” also explores larger subjects within that framework: the ambitions of young Chinese students who come to the U.S. in great numbers to pursue an education, the cultural divides that they have to bridge, and the generational differences between more traditional Chinese parents and their modern-age children. The Hollywood Reporter writes: “The unfolding investigation is presented with a level of suspense that’s involving and never exploitive. Besides being an agile storyteller, Shi, who shared DP duties with Shilin Sun, has a strong eye. She crafts potent visuals without the slightest showiness, whether capturing moments of tenderness or raging despair, or examining existing footage to highlight chilling details.”
Director Jiayan “Jenny” Shi took the time to talk to We Are Movie Geeks about FINDING YINGYING
Interview conducted by Tom Stockman November 12th 2020
Tom Stockman: Congratulations on your film FINDING YINGYING. I watched it last night and thought it was terrific.
Jiayan “Jenny” Shi: Thank you. We are so excited to be showing it at the St. Louis Film Festival which is not far from where the incident in the film happened.
TS: How did you first hear about the disappearance of the Yingying Zhang?
JS: When she went missing, I was an International student at Northwestern University. I was in a lot of Chinese chat groups and one was my college alumni group. I learned about Yingying’s disappearance from friends and alumni back in China. I didn’t think originally about making a documentary. I was just trying to spread the word about her and see what we could do to find her and I was posting information on my social media. I went down to Champaign to help with the search and after Yingying’s parents arrived, a lot of Chinese people would visit with them. They did not speak English and they did not know much about America.
TS: But you had never met Yingying before, had you?
JS: No I had not. I learned from somebody at the University of Illinois at Champaign about this case and then I learned that she and I had actually attended the same university in China.
TS: How could you relate to Yingying? Talk about that and talk about her diary that you narrate in your film.
JS: I could definitely relate to her. We were both international students . I didn’t know what happened to her but I knew how worried her parents must have been. My parents learned about the disappearance while they were in China and they had been texting me a lot, urging me to not go outside, and just stay home and be safe. They warned me not to go to Champaign because there might be somebody dangerous there. Yingying was someone who probably had similar experiences as me, Someone who just came to the US. It wasn’t until I attended a press conference, about two months after her disappearance, that her family revealed that she actually had a diary. Yingying’s boyfriend read the last line in the last entry of her diary at the press conference: “Life is too short to be ordinary”. Those were her own words in her handwriting but I didn’t see the rest of the diary until 2018, a year after her disappearance.
TS: When did you come to the US?
JS: I came to the US in the fall of 2016, just about 10 months before all of this happened. I was pretty new to the US. So in 2018 I got access to the diary. That was the first time I read, in her handwriting, her experience being an international student.
TS: She speaks of loneliness in her diary. Is that something you felt when you came to the US at first?
JS: Definitely. I myself kept a diary, but I didn’t write it down, I put it on social media. But yes, I was lonely and I was home sick. And I had to adapt to the environment here very quickly because I started my graduate program and it was a one year program so I had to familiarize myself immediately to the learning environment here and overcome the language barriers and get to know the culture. Before I came here, I thought I was well-prepared. I passed the exams, got the grades to get into Northwestern and familiarize myself with American media. I had never been to the US, so for me living here was something totally different and challenging. And I’d say it was not just challenging for me but for Yingying and a lot of us when we first come here. Everyone shares that similar experience.
TS: You went back and did some follow up interviews in China while Yingying’s family was preparing for the murder trial. There was one scene where Yingying’s mother looks at you and says that you remind her of her daughter. How did that make you feel?
JS: I have mixed feelings. That was not the first time she mentioned that. When I first met her here in the US, she told me that I looked like her daughter. I did not know what I should say to her. Sometimes when she would mention that, she looked happy so I felt that maybe that was a comfort to have someone around who looked like her daughter. But on the other hand that was also a reminder that her daughter is gone and there is someone else here that just looks like her. So for me that was a mixed feeling. I did not know what to say and I did not want to say the wrong thing and make her cry. She was very emotional and I was very careful about what I said and the way I behaved.
TS: When you were in China you captured some very intimate moments of grief with the Zhang family. Angry moments with breaking of dishes and cursing and it gets pretty intense. Was there some footage that you shot that you chose not to use for that sequence?
JS: I say we put every major moment about how the loss of Yingying has affected her family in the film. Specifically speaking about that fight, we used very little footage. They were throwing things at each other but we did not include that. Also, as a filmmaker, I tried to navigate my role. Nobody saw that flight coming, so when it first happened we were already filming. Right away, I tried to stop the fight but we cut that part. I tried to calm them down. Besides that, if you ask about what else we shot but didn’t use, We actually follow different characters including the volunteer searchers who appears in the first part of the story. We wanted to document them and the search. We didn’t want to miss anything, so we had a lot of that footage that we didn’t use. We really wanted the story to focus on Yingying and her family. We focused on their perspective to put the audience in their shoes, this experience as a family and what happened to them.
TS: The Zhan family seemed determined to see Yingying’s murderer executed. Were they aware how difficult it is to get a death penalty conviction in the US? Did they have an attorney explaining this to them?
JS: Yes, they did have an attorney explaining the whole American criminal justice system to them. Yingying’s boyfriend was a PhD candidate at that time and he had more knowledge about the differences between the Chinese and the US criminal justice systems.
TS: Explain that. How is carrying out the death penalty different in China?
JS: I’m not an expert, but I would say that is something like this happened in China, it is very likely that the defendant would be found guilty and then would get the death penalty. I’ve never really followed a court case in China but that judgment’s based more on cultural background and I think that Yingying’s parents share the same cultural background as I have, so it was understandable that they would have that kind of hope that he would get the death penalty. I myself, after having followed the story for over three years, now understand better how the US criminal justice system works. For a long time I wondered about such a heinous crime that happened to this innocent woman with such a bright future of head of her. She had her life taken away from her by this person, who I don’t even want to mention because I don’t want to glorify what he did. I was very aware of the family’s desire for the death penalty. And that’s always something interesting to present in the film because I think in the media coverage there are a lot focus on the crime itself and all the gruesome details. But from my perspective, as someone from the Chinese community, I feel like Yingying and her family somehow got lost in the media narrative. The way the family was portrayed in the mainstream media is the typical victim stereotype. It was always mom crying and speaking in Mandarin. A lot of reporters only speak English so they can’t really get a cultural connection to Yingying’s family. To me, this film is to show something that is not often seen in mainstream media and to go beyond the headlines and to show the humanity behind the heinous crime. In the film I see a lot of different people coming out to support a family. That was something we wanted to highlight.
TS: You did a great job with that. Has Yingying’s family seen your film?
JS: Yes. We showed the film to them before any public screening because we wanted to make sure that they were on the same page as everything in the film. We took their feedback into consideration. We wanted to make sure they were OK with everything. I was a bit nervous before the family watched the film. I worried that they might feel uncomfortable about the family conflict that we showed. I think in Chinese culture people don’t want to show their family affairs in public but I was surprised at how much Yingying’s parents and her boyfriend were OK with everything. That was exactly what happened to them and those were the facts, and that’s not something people always see in the media. Also there were our efforts to highlight Yingying as a person, to try to keep her alive throughout the film. Her family really appreciated our efforts.
TS: You’ve kept in touch with the Zhen family I assume.
JS: Yes. We have had several subsequent conversations. I’d like to keep them updated as to what is going on in terms of the film. Yingying’s mom is staying at home because of her health condition. Her brother is working at a restaurant and has a little baby now and got married. I hope that will bring some joy and happiness to the family. Yingying’s father went back to work as a truck driver. But to them it was very difficult for life to just go on. It’s impossible for them to get over this.
TS: Let’s talk about you. Is this your first feature length documentary?
JS: Yes. I studied journalism in China for my bachelor’s degree and then immediately after that I started studying journalism at Northwestern University. I took some documentary journalism classes so my specialization is video journalism. I try to use visuals to tell powerful stories. That was in 2016 and 2017. Yingying’s story came out the last quarter when I was in school. I started filming it as a student because I had followed the story for a while and I had also created a student version as a student project. I graduated and continued to work on the project. And now it is a feature-length film.
TS: Has it played a lot of other film festival?
JS: Our world premiere was supposed to be at SXSW but we had to wait for the next timing to launch the film so we started robust festival run in October and we have screened it in 13 film festivals so far including the Chicago International Film Festival , Los Angeles Asian-Pacific film Festival where it has been well-received by different audiences. Not only Asian America audiences but also general audiences. So we really see the potential for bringing the story further . We hope the film can travel to different places so more people can hear Yingying’s story and she can be memorialized in a good way.
TS: What’s your next project?
JS: I have started a project. It is also related to the American Chinese Experian but I can’t say much about it now because it is early development, but I am currently doing research.
TS: Good luck then with FINDING YINGYING and all of your future projects.
Master Class: Directing with Ken Kwapisis part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival. This Master Class presentation will be Saturday Nov 14th at 1:00pm. Register and Watch for free by clicking HERE
Ken Kwapis, who grew up in Belleville, Ill., and attended Saint Louis University High, is a former Cinema St. Louis Award winner. This master class on directing will draw on material from his terrific new book, “But What I Really Want to Do Is Direct: Lessons from a Life Behind the Camera.” The Library Journal hails it as “an enjoyable memoir that offers lessons of filmmaking, what counts as success in Hollywood, and the magic of film.” Kwapis is an award-winning director who has moved easily between the worlds of feature filmmaking and television directing. He made his feature debut with “Sesame Street Presents: Follow That Bird,” and his 11 films include “A Walk in the Woods,” with Robert Redford and Nick Nolte; “License to Wed,” with Robin Williams and John Krasinski; “The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants” and “He’s Just Not That Into You,” two highly successful adaptations of best-selling books; “Sexual Life,” which he also wrote; and “He Said, She Said,” co-directed with his wife, Marisa Silver. For television, Kwapis helped launch nine series. He directed the pilot of the Emmy Award-winning series “The Office,” receiving a 2007 Emmy nomination for directing the episode “Gay Witch Hunt.” Kwapis also earned an Emmy nomination for his work as a producer-director of “Malcolm in the Middle.” He directed the pilots for the groundbreaking “The Larry Sanders Show” and the Emmy Award-winning “The Bernie Mac Show.” His other TV work includes multiple episodes of “The Santa Clarita Diet,” “Happyish,” “One Mississippi,” and “Freaks and Geeks.”
Director Ken Kwapis on why he decided to write about the directing process, film school, and why he thinks it’s important for directors to get out of video village.
At 63 years old, director Ken Kwapis has clearly entered a more reflective period of his life. His enduring career in the film industry has created quite the resume; some highlights being He’s Just Not That into You, A Walk in the Woods, Big Miracle, and of course helping to launch the critically acclaimed and culturally revered NBC remake of The Office. In October of this year, Kwapis published his very first book. But What I Really Want to Do Is Direct is Kwapis’ entry into the now-ubiquitous genre of tell-all guides to the filmmaking universe. In the vein of RebelWithout a Crew, Adventures in the Screen Trade, Save the Cat, and In the Blink of an Eye, Kwapis’ new book provides a unique window into the vast Hollywood film and television machine. The book is chock full of one-of-a-kind insights and thoughtful pieces of advice.
With the release of his book, and in the lead up to a virtual Masterclass that he is offering at the St. Louis International Film Festival on November 14th, I had the opportunity to interview Kwapis last week. In our nearly hour-long discussion, we conversed over the intentions behind his book, discussed the future of film school, and briefly talked in-depth about a later chapter in his book about the contrivance of video village.
Q: Obviously, there are already a lot of books that exist that cover and try to explain the filmmaking process. What were you hoping to bring to the table when you set out to write your own book on the process?
I’ve been a director for 37 years. For the past five to ten years, I’ve had the pleasure of mentoring a lot of up-and-coming directors. I’ve worked as an advisor at the Sundance Director’s Lab and a lot of the discussions I have with young filmmakers have to do with the craft of directing. You know, how to previsualize a scene, how to talk to actors, how to communicate with your composer. [But], I’ve also found that a lot of the things that people wanted to talk about were not craft related, but fell more into the category of how to comport yourself as a director, how to oversee a set in a way that people feel acknowledged and safe and respected, ow to assert authority over a group of people without becoming authoritarian, etc. And then there’s been questions about how to survive in this very unpredictable business; how to develop the tenacity to hang in there year after year, trying to get a project off the ground, or how to develop the resilience to bounce back after innumerable setbacks. So, these are things I felt like I had not learned in film school; these are things that are not taught in film school. I started writing about those kinds of issues and then it started to just snowball into a grander book, both a memoir and a kind of general tutorial about the directing process. But again, what started me off was feeling like there were things that were not discussed when I was at film school that I wish I had known about.
Q: Did you always intend for it to be a book? I know you mentioned memoir, and I think that’s a really interesting way to frame it, in addition to the book being instructional. The idea that you’re sort of reflecting, not only as a director, but as having a life in the film industry.
You know, I’ve never written a book before. But to keep me focused along the way, next to my laptop I just kept a little Post It note with three words on it. It said, Keep It Personal. That was my mantra with this. Keep It Personal. So, I don’t make any great claims about my work, although I’m very proud of it. Mostly, I just wanted to share the experiences I’ve had, the highs but also the lows. But again, first and last is can I keep it personal; can I keep it candid? You know, when I talk to young filmmakers, they are relieved to hear, for instance, that when I go up for a meeting for a job that I’m still nervous. That I still have anxiety about certain aspects.
DF-02482c: (L-r) JENNIFER ANISTON with director KEN KWAPIS on the set of New Line Cinema’s romantic comedy “He’s Just Not That Into You,” a Warner Bros. Pictures release.
Photo by Darren Michaels
Q: I understand you’re going to be doing a masterclass at the St. Louis International Film Festival this Saturday. As it relates to the book and what you’ve written, what are you hoping to teach in the masterclass? What insights are you hoping to give?
The masterclass is going to be based in part on the fifth chapter of the book, which is devoted to how to prepare to shoot a scene. The presentation will be focused on the directorial process, specifically the challenges of preparing a scene. What I’ll do is talk about various things that I try to keep in mind when I am prepping a scene. Whether it’s how to use color and light to help tell the story. Whether it’s making sure that I have good playable notes for the actors. There are just several tips and reminders for when you’re getting ready to shoot a scene. And along the way I’m going to show some clips from various films and shows to illustrate some of those concepts. But then what I want to do is share with the class a scene I directed from the film The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants. I chose the scene very deliberately and it’s something I talk about in the book, because on the surface it’s a very mundane scene. It’s just people talking on the telephone. [But] it’s very emotional. It’s certainly a high energy scene in that sense. But what I wanted to show was how you can make different craft choices that can take something that seems on the surface very uncinematic and make it quite cinematic.
Q: I understand that you attended film school when you were first getting started. I’m curious if your perspective on film school has changed over the years. Especially now with the internet and the prevalence of books like yours and online masterclasses, do you think your decision to go to film school would be different if you had grown up in the 21st Century?
I think film school was incredibly valuable to me for a number of reasons. One is that it really introduced me to the history of film in a way that I would not have had access to otherwise. Now obviously today, any film is at your fingertips. You can go to Netflix or Amazon or go to The Criterion Channel and see such a wide variety of films. But for me, to be in a class that focused on certain aspects of film history whether it was, for instance, the history of the documentary, the history of German film in the 20s and 30s, I just loved immersing myself in film culture. So, I really appreciated that. And I think it’s really fed into my own directing. But also, I feel like at both Northwestern (undergrad) and at USC (graduate student), I made friends with a lot of people who have since gone on to work in the film industry. So, I also feel like it was a great way to find a community of people. I mention this in the book, but I would also mention that the one deficit for me was that neither Northwestern’s film department nor USC’s cinema school required me or anyone to take an acting class. And I feel like learning about the acting process and how to talk to actors and how to elicit good performances out of actors was something I had to learn on my own. And I’ve made plenty of missteps along the way. I don’t know what [film school] is like now. My hunch is it’s probably not too different. But I feel like that was a big aspect of the directing process that film school kind of neglected.
Q: But would you reconsider film school now given all of the other content young filmmakers have available to them? Especially considering the considerable cost and time commitment.
I haven’t thought about that. Let me think about that for a little bit. I mean, the cost of any college education can be quite prohibitive. I would say that if you are passionate about film and television, you’re going to somehow do it whether you go to school or not. If you have that passion, you’ll figure out a way to do it. Again, I feel like there are certainly advantages that come with taking classes at a film school, but is it the be all and end all? Obviously not. There are many people who are working as writers and directors who did not come out of a film school. There are plenty of actors who did not study theatre in college. The best answer is that if you’re passionate about it, it’s not like you need it. But I’m always very appreciative of people who have a grasp of film history and again, I have benefited from that and I think it’s made my filmmaking a little richer to have had that background. Do you need to go to a university to get that? No, not at all.
Q: Well, part of the reason I ask is because my own perspective on film school has kind of evolved as I’ve gotten older. When I was first getting started, I got the sense, especially from a lot of younger filmmakers who were making it in the business, that film school was antiquated, that it was a waste of time and money. But as I’ve gotten older, and as I’ve started to take classes at community college, I’ve been really surprised by how much I just loved the classroom environment. So, while earlier I was really wanting to avoid film school, I’ve been much more interested in applying as of late. And so, I was just curious to see where you were coming from as someone who has attended film school.
Yeah, I think that as with any school situation, you may end up in a class and find that your classmates are maybe not as supportive as you’d like or a teacher who is a bit of a slavedriver. But just as often you’ll have a class where a teacher really fires your imagination. I can just think back to some teachers I’ve had who illuminated something about a film or a story or some aspect of the directing process. And so, I feel like again, I just would never discourage anyone from it. But if you go into it with a good attitude… Boy, it can really get you inspired and excited.
I would also say that at both of the schools I went to a lot of the most important discussions were the things that happened outside of the classroom with my fellow film students. Going to a movie together and just discussing a short in a movie for like hours. That’s the kind of thing that you can do without film school. But you may make some very important friends and meet some people who are equally passionate, or maybe passionate about the same kinds of things that you are. And it also may open you up to things, creative muscles that you may not realize you have until you’re in a situation where someone pushes you a little bit to exercise certain muscles.
Maybe having to get out of your comfort zone and be someone’s cinematographer or talk to actors suddenly kind of shifts up how you see the medium.
Q: I wonder… and this is segueing a little bit… how much of a director’s style or a director’s personal approach is baked in. You know, the age-old question of nature versus nurture. You mentioned that there are some directors who would be forced out of their comfort zone by being behind a camera, and there are other directors who may be forced out of their comfort zone by engaging with actors in a different way. And I’m curious if you think that’s something that is based on personality or if it’s acquired through experience?
I mean, it’s a great question. You can certainly look at the careers of a lot of different directors who simply evolved over time and changed so that they didn’t find a certain way of looking at things and stick with it their entire careers. But, at the same time, you can find people who almost are quickly locked into a way of looking at things and they are either too happy with that to change or just find material that reinforces the way they look at the world. Kubrick began as a still photographer before he became a filmmaker, and there’s no question that he brings a still photographer’s eye to how he shoots his scenes. But you could also argue that Kubrick, over time, began sort of playing a character of Stanley Kubrick. And he ended up, as a director, playing a character who only did certain kinds of things.
But there are also a lot of good directors for whom it’s not one thing or the other. For instance, if you look at somebody like Kurosawa, for example. I’ve been watching a lot of Kurosawa lately. Technically, he’s off the charts.
His handling of the camera, his handling of camera movement, his sense of position, but never at the expense of the human component of the story. And so, I think in a lot his films it’s astonishing to me the ability to block for the camera is so technically virtuosic, and at the same time it never gets in the way of the human aspect of the story. You know, Welles is like that in many ways.
But you know, there are a lot of directors like Wes Anderson, who are very popular for doing a very particular thing. And sometimes I wonder whether or not he’s a little bit locked into a certain way of looking at things and I’m not sure that it always serves the material. I mean, it serves the material sometimes better than others. But he seems to have a very particular way of framing and shooting and is someone who I certainly think by and large treats actors as pictorial elements as opposed to flesh and blood people. Granted, actors seem to really love working with him.
I think that’s an interesting point, especially when you mention Kubrick sort of becoming a character of himself. Because I think very much, at least from what I have learned, is that for a lot of directing you are fulfilling a role. I mean there are certain instances where I think you have to project confidence when you don’t have a lot of confidence, or you have to be assertive in moments when you don’t want to be assertive…
I mean, there are plenty of directors who are extroverted and there are plenty of directors who are introverted. You know, some people love conflict and feel like their stories benefit from creating an energy on the set that is garrulous, and there are some people who are very quiet on the set.
And yet it doesn’t mean that their films are any less passionate. So, I think that the great thing about telling a story in a series form, as opposed to a feature film, is that there’s such a wide variety of personalities that have managed to express themselves. It’s amazing.
Q: I’m wondering how much you think that fulfilling a role effects the process and in what ways?
I think that everyone develops a working style. Another way to put it is that everyone has a certain kind of leadership style on the set. But that’s different than playing a role. I mean I have a very particular way of overseeing the set. But I don’t think that I’m playing a character so much. When I was mentioning that about Kubrick, I just sometimes feel like there are certain choices he makes that are so expected after a while. Now, his films are wonderful. So, it’s not even a put down. But there’s a difference between how someone oversees a set and what their brand is as a filmmaker. But just as often, there are wonderful directors who do wildly different things that kind of defy your ability to brand them.
Q: I get the sense that you are the type of director who doesn’t necessarily want to be associated with a brand. And you sort of like to adapt to whatever story comes your way that resonates. Do you think that’s accurate?
Yeah, absolutely. Let me think of some directors who I admire for that very thing.
To me, Rob Reiner comes to mind.
Rob Reiner’s a great example of that. One director I really like is Stephen Frears. Stephen Frears is somebody who’s done a very wide variety of different things and again, one of the things that I think makes him valuable is that he brings his personality to everything, but he’s not a brand.
Q: I think this discussion kind of ties in really well with a chapter of your book that really caught my attention, which was Escape from Video Village. As you discuss in the chapter, we used to look through the eyepiece and have that blind faith with our camera operators and our DPs to execute the shot. And nowadays you have the video assist and digital cameras that allow you to play back stuff whenever you want. There are two different directors who I think perfectly illustrate the two starkly different approaches to this new technology. You have David Fincher, who has embraced the technological advancements and who seems to really like staying behind a monitor and analyzing the composition. Whereas somebody like Christopher Nolan has a monitor he wears around his neck and who is always right next to the camera. I’m curious how you think these different approaches impact the set and the momentum of the set.
Well, I would say that if you are actually stopping to play back takes over and over again, you have a kind of herky jerky rhythm during your shooting day. And obviously a lot of people do that. And it’s not simply people who are into the composition. I mean there are a lot of performer-directors who feel like they need to see themselves and see what the performance looks like before they can go on. But I feel like it makes it hard to build momentum if you’re constantly stopping to review the footage. A lot of what I think is important is for the crew and cast to have faith in the director rather than gathering around a monitor to decide whether it’s worth continuing with a scene or to move on.
Q: In the chapter you also talk about regardless of whether you’re reviewing footage, just the energy it creates to be a mile away from your actors…
And I would say that for any kind of technically complicated shot, you want to make sure it’s working. So you’re either going to watch it [on a monitor] during rehearsal or you’re going to watch a take or two [after you cut]. But if the scene is such that it’s between two or three characters and there’s not a lot of choreography but there’s a lot of important story going on, you have a choice. You can watch the actors, or you can watch an image of the actors. And I feel like the actor will benefit if you’re actually watching them. They will get your energy in a way that they wouldn’t if you’re off looking at a monitor.
Q: That makes sense. But the image is what the audience will be seeing. And I think part of the trouble is that you’re taking three-dimensional space… the blocking, the camera, the actors… and you’re translating that into two-dimensional space for the audience. And I’m wondering if you have any lessons or advice for being able to look at a scene two-dimensionally without being at a monitor?
I feel like to be able to inspire your actors to bring something to life and to be able to inspire your crew and cinematographer to capture it in a way that’s dynamic are two different conversations that you need to be equally versed in having. For me, I always call the shots. And sometimes the actors have particular needs that require me to make an adjustment. It’s just that I don’t feel that I need to monitor it, take to take. Once it’s set, and once the camera crew knows how to execute it, I feel like I can resume my focus on the cast. But it’s a dance. You’re constantly dancing.
Q: That last point you made is really interesting to me. And I think that is a commonality with a lot of different directors to be able to just stand by the camera, to look at the cast, and to understand how that’s going to translate. As a director, I have a hard time with that. I often get overwhelmed if I’m looking at all the moving parts. And I find that having a monitor really helps me to focus on what’s in the frame.
No, it totally makes sense. My hunch is that over time you will feel more or less secure about not being locked into the monitor. But I would only add that there are certain advantages that being near the camera gives you. And it may be seeing one of the actors off camera who’s doing something interesting that you might want to use, that you wouldn’t have seen if you were only at the monitor. And the ideal thing is that I’ll have a monitor, like Christopher Nolan does around his neck, or on the camera, that I can peek at even as I’m mostly focused on the cast. But what inspired me to write that chapter had as much to do with the negative aspects of being in this conglomeration of people.
…Well, you do talk about the whole “director by committee” thing in the chapter. You mention it in a way that I thought was very poignant…
By the way, that is a common problem. I mean, we would all love to be the Finchers and the Chris Nolans of the world where no one is going to bother them. They are unique. By and large you will be answerable to people. You talked about getting overwhelmed by all the moving pieces. What I encourage directors to guard against is getting overwhelmed by all the opinions.
Q: One of the most stressful situations I have faced as a director is when I don’t know what notes I want to give. Sometimes the scene just isn’t working, and I can’t put my finger on why. And other times I have so many notes that I find it hard to keep track. Have you ever had this experience? How do you handle situations like this?
Oh, yeah. I mean, sometimes you’re in the middle of the take and you’re having to remind yourself what the note your about to give is. I think part of it is that when you have several notes, you kind of have to prioritize them so that you’re not overloading everyone with too many things to try. Look, I remember shooting a scene once where the screenwriter came up to me after I called cut and said, “Ken that was a great take. I just have five notes.” (laughs)
It’s also possible that, if you have four notes to give, two of the four may sort themselves out as you shoot. So, you might not need to manage each individual thing. I mean, look, Stanley Kubrick will do forty takes of somebody doing something insignificant like crossing the street. And I think what is the method involved with that? Well, I think the method is that at a certain point you do something over and over again so many times that you’re in such a weird autopilot mode that maybe some quality comes out in how you do it that is unconscious or something. But frankly, most people don’t get the luxury of doing forty takes of someone crossing a street.
Q: That is something I wanted to mention. I’m curious what your philosophy is for the pace of production? I think you mention in the chapter that you like to give notes to actors in a staggered way. And that there are certain notes that you want to wait and give after the actors “find the scene” …
Yeah, my feeling is that if you don’t let the actors explore a little bit, it ultimately will slow you down. Because everyone is just going to be tripping all over themselves trying to pick up the pace when they don’t even understand what they’re doing yet…
…Well, I think especially in the independent filmmaking world, there’s this pressure to move as fast as possible, to get as much shot as possible, and to get people in and out. And I’ve just always resisted that philosophy. When we get on set, I want to get exactly what we set out to get. And I want to create an environment where we can push ourselves to keep doing better. And a lot of the time I think this is undermined by the rushed pace that’s instilled. I’m wondering how you set the pace during pre-production and on set?
I would just say that, for me, I always try to schedule the day so that I jump into the deep end of the pool first. It’s not about racing. It’s about not being afraid to jump into the meatiest scene. Jump into the tough stuff right away. As opposed to the stuff that you know that you can kind of coast a little bit with. Save that stuff for when you need to pick up the pace at the end of the day. But if you can organize your day so that right up front, you’re dealing with the meatier material; it will allow you to gauge how to pace the rest of your day. Otherwise, if you’re starting with your smaller scenes, your eight-page scenes, your quarter-page scenes and you have this behemoth staring at you down the road, then that’s the thing that’s going to dictate how fast or slow your day is going to go, not the smaller things. So, this is a very strategic thing. I’ve had like ten-page days where there’s a four-page scene. And if I can put that scene upfront, if I can front load the day with the tougher scene, I can manage the time better than if we were waiting to do it after lunch.
You’re always going to be cutting corners at some point. But you don’t want to be cutting corners on something that’s emotionally complicated. And I don’t necessarily feel that people do their best work if you’re constantly telling them to go faster. I think all it does is make people a little hectic. It’s not a recipe for more creativity, that’s for sure.
Q: The last thing I wanted to ask you about has to do with working with actors. I’m assuming there was improvisation on The Office. How much do trust your actors to improvise without it getting away from the intention of the scene?
The thing to know about The Office is that there was very little improvisation. The Office was a fairly tightly scripted series. And it was scripted to sound improvised. And so, I don’t have a lot to say about improvisation. When I’m given a piece of comedic material, whether it’s The Office or Malcom in the Middle, I look for ways to ground it in reality. And then if I have a piece of dramatic material, I often try to hunt for the humor that’s hiding in the drama. So I don’t think of myself as a comedy director. I don’t think of myself as a dramatic director. I think of myself as a director of human stories. And I try, by and large, when working on something that’s quote, “a comedy,” to not think of it that way at all. If something is truthful, it will probably be funny to the audience. If it’s not truthful, but it’s witty, it may get a chuckle, but it’s not going to be very impactful. So… first and last… Is what’s going on in front of the camera relatable and human? If it is, I have a hunch that an audience will find it funny when they need to.
Ken Kwapis’ book, But What I Really Want to Do Is Direct, is available now on Amazon.
THE BALLAD OF JOHN HENRYscreensas part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival November 5th – 22nd.Ticket information for the virtual screening can be found HERE
The ambitious documentary THE BALLAD OF JOHN HENRY by St. Louis-based filmmaker Matthew Rice analyzes how an ex-slave became one of America’s greatest tall-tale heroes: John Henry. Based on Scott Reynolds Nelson’s book “Steel Drivin’ Man,” the film provides a fresh perspective on the song and folk tale by exploring a myriad of related subjects, including the convict-lease program, an unjust legal system developed after the Civil War as a replacement for slavery. Director Rice worked as an intern on Ken Burns’ “The Vietnam War” series, and his film shares some of that master documentarian’s sensibility. Rice’s debut film, the short “The Yodel Within,” played the 2011 St. Louis Filmmakers Showcase, and “The Ballad of John Henry” received the jury award for Best Editing at this year’s event.
Matthew Rice is a documentary filmmaker based in St. Louis, MO. He currently works as a videographer for the Washington University School of Medicine developing educational content for the doctors of tomorrow. Matthew began his filmmaking career at Loyola Marymount University’s School of Film and Television creating his first short documentary film, The Yodel Within. This documentary was selected by five film festivals winning several awards including “Audience Favorite” and “Best Credits Sequence.” This project inspired Matthew to dedicate himself completely to learning the craft of documentary story telling. He has collaborated with experts at the top of their field to develop video content that both engages and educates audiences.
Matthew Rice took the time to talk to We Are Movie Geeks about his film
Interview conducted by Tom Stockman November 11, 2020
Tom Stockman: What inspired you to make this film about John Henry?
Matthew Rice: Like a lot of people, I’d heard about John Henry as a child. I read a book by Jack Keats with beautiful illustrations and that was my first introduction. Disney made a movie that had several Tall Tale heroes in it including John Henry as well as Pecos Bill and Paul Bunyan. So I knew about the legend that way and I always thought it seemed like a fun story, and as I got older, I became increasingly more interested in how history played into it and whether or not John Henry was a real person and what inspired his story.
TS: What were some of the biggest challenges in making THE BALLAD OF JOHN HENRY?
MR: It was my first feature-length documentary, so just learning how to make that happen was a challenge. But really the biggest challenge was that there was not a lot of archival materials or photographs available. Typically when you’re watching a historical documentary, you’ll see a lot of photos and footage from a particular time period. A lot of these workers connected to the John Henry story were illiterate and the working conditions were terrible. This was a real dark chapter in American history that would have been forgotten if not for a lot of historians such as the Scott Nelson, who I worked with and who dug up a lot of the census records and Virginia state penitentiary records so we could try and figure out who John Henry really was and what were some of the challenges that he faced.
TS: And also you spend a lot of time in the documentary on the debate over where exactly this challenge between John Henry and the steam drill may have taken place. Talcott, Virginia claims to be the home of John Henry’s achievement and they have a John Henry Days Festival there. Did you travel to that?
MR: Yes, I went to two of those festivals. They have a big parade but the parade itself doesn’t feature much about John Henry until the end when there is a float with him. They also have an event there that explains how tunnel construction at the time was such a unique form of labor. That city does claim John Henry’s fame was there and to this day most of the residents that I talk to there, like Jimmy Costa, an historian who appears in the film, feel very strongly that John Henry did work on the Big Bend tunnel. But some agree with Scott Nelson who claims that Henry was actually working on the Lewis Tunnel. That’s totally fair and they are welcome to have their opinions. There’s always going to be a feeling that we can change our understanding of some things. I’ve looked into the research that was done at the Big Bend tunnel in Talcott and another tunnel in Alabama to find which one John Henry worked. When I looked at the research on both of those tunnels, I did not find the evidence that I found at Lewis Tunnel. The facts were that they had a prison inmate named John Henry and there are records of him working at Lewis Tunnel and there are records of a steam drill being used in the Lewis Tunnel, so all of the elements are there.
TS: How did that John Henry die?
MR: There’s no exact record but during that time most of the prison inmates that were working in the tunnels were dying from consumption, which was a general term for lung infection. Silicosis was not well known at that time but it’s likely that a lot of people died at that time from silicosis working in those tunnels. They did not have a good understanding of it nor did they know how to treat it, and ultimately they just kept forcing people to work in these unsafe conditions.
TS: Did they not even wear masks when they were working in these tunnels?
MR: No they did not wear masks during that time. I show clips in the film from a government-made documentary from the 1920s about silicosis and that was the first time alarms were raised that silica dust could kill you. Before that no one really worried about it. Now of course there are OSHA rules but back then there were no masks or protection. Records show some workers refused to go back into the tunnel after there had been an explosion there, so I think some of the men knew the danger but they just didn’t know it was causing so much damage to their lungs.
TS: I noticed some miniatures that you filmed, like a diorama. Are those in a museum somewhere?
MR: That was a diorama at Hinton Railroad Museum near Talcott Virginia that I used a couple of shots of. An artist carved those figures out of wood. He had passed away but I did speak with his son and got some of the history behind it. It took him 10 years to create that model. In addition to that, because there was such a lack of archival footage to use in the film, I tried my hand at creating some miniature sets as well. I used a miniature railroad model.
TS: I think the railroad models added a nice element to the look of the film. Let’s talk about you. I understand that you interned with Ken Burns. That sounds like a pretty prestigious gig. How did you get that?
MR: Partly luck. At that time I was a film student at Loyola Marymount University. The Dean of the film school had a lot of connections with documentary filmmakers including Ken Burns. Burns came and gave the graduation commencement and let us know that they were planning on doing internships and that I could be a trial student. So I drove all the way across the country to a small town in New Hampshire where Ken Burns works. I wasn’t sure what to expect when I got there but I absolutely loved it. I learned so much about how to craft a story and I wanted to try it myself. That’s where it all started
TS: What else did you learn specifically from Ken Burns?
MR: Everything from digitizing archival images and footage to how to conduct interviews, how to organize a story based on interviews and narration. One of the main takeaways that I got was that it takes a really long time to make one of his television broadcasts and he spends so much time making sure everything is perfect and factually correct. That was a good lesson because when I left there and started working on this film, it took me a good five years to finish it. It’s a lengthy process.
TS: Has Ken Burns seen THE BALLAD OF JOHN HENRY?
MR: I don’t know. I worked mostly with his editors and I know they have seen the film. That was kind of the beauty of that internship that Ken Burns is always there it is always going to teach you stuff but he had a huge team of people working on his projects. They were ll very gifted individuals and I learned so much from each one of them and they’ve always been there to support me even after I left.
TS: You say this was your first feature film. What other kinds of films have you made?
MR: I’ve mostly worked on short documentary films. Some of them have been paid jobs, working with nonprofits, or with companies that want a documentary film online or for advertising. I’ve shot some of my own documentaries. The first documentary short I worked on was called THE YODEL WITHIN. I was trying to learn how to yodel, and that was my first introduction into the St. Louis International Film Festival and the St. Louis Filmmakers Showcase.
TS: There’s a vibrant filmmaking community here in St. Louis. What’s your next project?
MR: Covid has made things a little more difficult but I’ve already started doing research and interviews for a project on the story behind Paul Bunyan and how that legend came to be. I’m sticking with the Tall Tale stories.
TS: Has THE BALLAD OF JOHN HENRY played at many film fests so far?
MR: Yes it’s playing this weekend at one in Texas and one in Virginia. So far it’s been in 15 film festivals.
TS: Great. How has it been received?
MR: Very well. It’s hard with Covid because you don’t get to go out and interact with people but it’s amazing how these films festival have transitioned onto the online format, and I’ve been getting a lot of positive comments about the film
TS: Good luck with THE BALLAD OF JOHN HENRY and all of your future projects
“America’s Last Little Italy” explores the deep historic roots of the Hill, St. Louis’ iconic Italian neighborhood. Italians who immigrated to St. Louis in search of the American Dream built a “Little Italy” in the city’s heart that still flourishes to this day. Similar neighborhoods in other urban areas have long ago lost their specifically Italian character, making the Hill the last of a dying breed. The first feature by St. Louis Filmmakers Showcase alum Joseph Puleo, whose short “Top Son” won Best Comedy at the 2016 event, “America’s Last Little Italy” was the audience-choice winner as Best Documentary at this year’s Showcase.
AMERICA’S LAST LITTLE ITALY: THE HILLscreensas part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival November 5th – 22nd.Ticket information for the virtual screening can be found HERE
Joseph Puleo, director of AMERICA’S LAST LITTLE ITALY: THE HILL , took the time to talk to We Are Movie Geeks about the film
Interview conducted by Tom Stockman July 6th 2020(This interview originally posted whenAMERICA’S LAST LITTLE ITALY: THE HILLwas part of the St. Louis Filmmaker’s Showcase)
Tom Stockman: Congratulations on your documentary AMERICA’S LAST LITTLE ITALY: THE HILL. It’s very well done.
Joey Puleo: Thank you.
TS: Everybody likes The Hill. What is your relationship to the neighborhood?
JP: I had family that lived on The Hill, so growing up I used to visit all the time, but I didn’t really know the history behind the neighborhood. I just knew it was a place where my Italian relatives lived and because of the familial connection and my Italian American heritage, I’ve always felt a kinship to The Hill.
TS: How did you come up with this idea of making a documentary about The Hill? I’m a little surprised no one has before.
JP: Rio Vitale, our Executive Producer, had written a book on The Hill and he came to me with the idea of me directing a documentary on it. There has been a lot of books written about The Hill, but no documentaries. There has been programs on PBS about the restaurants, and the news stations would often go down there and highlight toasted ravioli and things like that, but there’s never been a film about the history of the neighborhood. The thing that really lit a fire under Rio was that the older generation on The Hill were starting to pass away. He was worried that if someone didn’t come along and film interviews with these people now, then all of these stories and all of this history was going to be lost.
TS: Good point. And some of these participants in your film have indeed passed away. When did you film all of these interviews?
JP: Rio came to us in late May 2018 and within five days, we were on The Hill interviewing. Basically anybody who was old and lived on the hill, we wanted to interview. We did 25 or 30 interviews with people who were over 80 years old. That’s where we started. We knew we could wait with the younger residents, but the main goal was getting the interviews of the elderly done first. So that entire summer, for three months, we did interviews. We interviewed around 70 people and about 55 made the cut. We waited on the B-roll until the summer after. I would have a shot list so I would know what footage to get. The timing worked out beautifully for us and everything just fell right into place.
TS: Your film is very well-organized. Did you start out with a treatment, or did you just start filming and see where the story took you?
JP: It was kind of twofold there. When Rio told me that this was what he wanted to do, he gave me a few books to read. One of those, Immigrants on the Hill: Italian-Americans in St. Louis, was written by Gary Mormino, who is probably the star historian of our film. Another book was An Urban Design Study For The Hill by Phillip C. McCurdy. He’s an architect who is also in the film. Those two books were what I used to lay out an outline, so I had a loose framework as to what I thought was important. When I was doing these interviews with the old-timers, that’s when the story started to take shape. Everybody kept telling us that The Hill is the last real ‘Little Italy’ and that stuck with me, so I figured if I was making that claim, I had to be able to back it up. So the first act of the film is the history of the neighborhood until till World War II. The second act was when we started getting into Father Polizzi, and seeing all of the other ‘Little Italys’ in America go under and him taking the steps to try to make sure that The Hill remained Italian and keep its ethnic identity.
TS: You go into the history of The Hill, and illustrate how it started out as a clay mining community. Do they still mine there today?
JP: No the mines are buried under where the hill is today
TS: Have you seen Bill Streeter‘s documentary BRICK BY CHANCE AND FORTUNE about St. Louis bricks?
JP: I have not.
TS: Oh you should. It’s all about how the mud in St. Louis produced such gorgeous red bricks. It really made me appreciate how attractive our bricks are compared to a city like Chicago which has sort of pukey yellow bricks.
JP: I’ll have to see that.
TS: You discuss in your film how the Northern Italians with look down on the Southern Italians, but they were all working class, I assume.
JP: There were prejudices there that go on to this day, but that really goes back to the old country, to Italy where that’s just the way it is. The Sicilians were the peasants who worked the fields. There’s also the speaking of different dialects, not being able to understand each other. Sicilian culture is a completely different culture than the Northerners. The Northern Italians are a lot more laid-back and subdued. When you’re thinking about Italians, you’re typically thinking about Sicilians. They are a bit more boisterous, so it’s kind of a culture clash. Me being Sicilian helped in making the film in that it made it less difficult to talk about those things.
TS: Was there anybody that you wanted to interview for your film but we’re unable to?
JP: No not really. Everybody basically wanted to be in the movie.
TS: Yes, there’s a lot of pride in that neighborhood and I think that really comes through.
JP: Yes, they were excited about the fact that we were just there making the documentary and they wanted to be part of it.
TS: When I was a kid growing up in West County my dad would drive us to The Hill to eat, but he would always precede ‘Hill’ with a certain derogatory ethnic term that was used by many outsiders back in the day. I noticed that you really don’t mention that in the film.
JP: Yes, that was something we avoided on purpose. My whole view with this project was to focus on the people of the neighborhood, so I didn’t go through the thought process of people throughout other parts of St. Louis and how they view the neighborhood. The people on The Hill never referred to themselves as living on anything but ‘The Hill’, so when I was talking to them I made the conscious decision not to mention that. I wanted to keep it insular
TS: I get it. I get the impression that these people are likely thick-skinned. I think if someone said that term perhaps they might not be particularly offended by it.
JP: I agree. That is just one of the names that people called it. A film gets into prejudice somewhat when we’re talking about how Italians would be viewed in someone’s head.
TS: Yes you keep your film very positive. So many documentaries today have to have an agenda, while AMERICA’S LAST LITTLE ITALY: THE HILL just documents. I like the way your film illustrated how those on The Hill addressed crime. There’s this fellow Joe Causino in your film who encouraged young people on The Hill to participate in sports instead of joining gangs and causing trouble. It seems like The Hill is always been somewhat crime-free at least in terms of violent crime
JP: Yes, and we get into that in the second act showing how the neighborhood kind of policed itself. There’s a guy in the movie named Jim Merlo and he says that if there was anything that residents of The Hill saw in terms of activities that would not bring pride to the neighborhood, they were going to step in and tell you about it. That was really the thought process of everyone on The Hill. You go down there and see the well-manicured lawns, everything is taken care of, everything is dealt with with pride. They are just not going to accept crime going on in that neighborhood. We do touch on some crime there during prohibition, but that was really a way for them to make money when they had to get involved in prohibition. It’s always been a safe neighborhood and I attribute that to members of the community not allowing criminal activity to go on.
TS: That’s really in the spirit of Joe Causino who you talk about in the film.
JP: Yes, in the 1930s and 40s there were a lot of boys on the hill. Italians at that time we’re having a lot of children, so they were these boys in the neighborhood and Joe Causino came in and did what he did to keep them from getting into trouble. He started these sports clubs and many incredible athletes came from these clubs. It’s really a tribute to him that he saw a need and provided an athletic arena for them to play in. And of course from that you got Yogi Berra, and Joe Garagiola, and Frank Borgi and the other members of the 1950 soccer team that defeated England in the World Cup.
TS: The vintage footage you used in the film spectacular. Was all of that footage on The Hill?
JP: Yes. We got lucky. We sent out a message letting everyone know that if they had 8mm film, family home movies, we were hoping that could be donated for use in the documentary . Multiple Hill families came through with original reels of film that we were able to convert into HD. My family had some 8mm film that we were able to bring forward. That was huge for us getting that film, and not having to go to stock footage very often. We did go with stock footage for a couple of things that were happening nationally, such as things from the war, but when the documentary talks about a confectionery being on every corner, we have 8mm footage of a confectionery there. When we talk about Family’s cooking Sunday dinners there, we have footage of that basement kitchen on The Hill. That was big for us.
TS: Oh, that was great. That’s really the heart of the film.
JP: 100%. The biggest thing for me was keeping the audience in the era, so there’s a point where we are talking about the building of shotgun homes and the fact that a lot of the homes were built on stilts then filled in with concrete later. I was able to go to 8mm film to show that as opposed to going down there now in 2020 and shooting in 4K and splicing it in. I really never wanted to take the audience out of that time.
TS: What filmmakers did you collaborate with on this project?
JP: My co-producer and editor is Steve Cakouros
TS: Is he a St. Louis guy?
JP: Yes, we met at Lindenwood film school and have been making films together since.
TS: I remember the short comedy you made, TOP SON about the young man who looks just like Tom Cruise. I interviewed that film’s star Evan Ferrante. Wasn’t there talk about that film becoming a feature?
JP: Yes there was. In 2016, we did the festival circuit for TOP SON. In 2017 we got into a contest that Kevin Hart put on where our film got to go to Montreal is part of the ‘Just For Laughs’ festival. That was a huge deal for us. We came back to St. Louis and a local producer wanted to help us make it into a feature and we worked about another year on it and then the money fell through and we were unable to go forward with TOP SON. But I guess everything happens for a reason because within a month, Rio came to us with The Hill idea and we started working on AMERICA’S LAST LITTLE ITALY: THE HILL.
TS: So there is a TOP SON feature script out there?
JP: Yes. Myself and Steve wrote a feature script, so we still have that one in the back pocket. But this documentary about The Hill had to be made so that’s what we set our sights on.
TS: Have the residents of The Hill seen AMERICA’S LAST LITTLE ITALY: THE HILL yet?
JP: No, July 10 when the St. Louis Filmmakers Showcase starts virtually will be the first time that anyone will have the opportunity to see it.
TS: It’s too bad about this virus. Did you have a big a plan for some sort of screening for the movie for the people on The Hill that were involved?
JP: The dream was to have everybody from The Hill go to a packed theater and see themselves on the big screen, especially some of the older participants. Corona really threw a wrench into that plan, but I’m trying to be positive about everything. More people than ever will be able to see the film because it is it streaming, including a lot of people that probably wouldn’t go to a movie theater.
TS: Beyond the St. Louis Filmmakers Showcase, what are your plans for the AMERICA’S LAST LITTLE ITALY: THE HILL?
JP: We have submitted the film to about 15 festivals, especially ones that are located in areas with a large Italian population. Everything at this point seems to be going online, so I don’t know if there will be any in-person festival that I will actually go to, but the goal is still to have a festival run and potentially strike a deal with a distributor, or PBS or any of those options.
TS: I could totally see KETC running your film. They ran Bill Streeter‘s brick documentary and Ron Stevens documentary about KSHE. They seem to enjoy showing well-made documentaries with local ties.
JP: The main goal for us is to get the film seen by as many people as possible and to bring awareness of this neighborhood to the masses. To show that this neighborhood still does exist and that it’s still vibrant and strong. Everyone thinks that all of the Little Italys are just tourist attractions where they are selling flags and trinkets, but there’s still a Little Italy here in St. Louis that exists in its original fashion.
TS: The Hill in St. Louis has maintained its ethnic identity unlike any other Little Italy, and I could ask you why that is, but that’s what your film is about and I think watching your film answers that questions.
JP: Yes that was the goal of the film, to answer that question. Hopefully we did so and made the neighborhood proud and made St. Louis proud.
TS: What is your next project Joseph?
JP: We’ve been talking about the potential of doing a couple of other documentaries We have a couple of ideas but nothing that I can share at this moment The virus has put a hamper on all the plans that we have had moving forward.
TS: Best of luck with AMERICA’S LAST LITTLE ITALY: THE HILL and all of your future projects.
Author Liel Leibovitz will be speaking at the St. Louis Jewish Book Festival on Sunday, November 8 at 2pm. Visit stljewishbookfestival.org for the latest information.Ticket information for this online Liel Leibovitzevent can be found HERE
Liel Leibovitz is an Israeli-American journalist, author, media critic and video game scholar. His book Stan Lee, A Life in Comics is part of the prizewinning Jewish Lives series, a meditation on the deeply Jewish and surprisingly spiritual roots of Stan Lee and Marvel Comics. Few artists have had as much of an impact on American popular culture as Stan Lee. The characters he created—Spider-Man and Iron Man, the X-Men and the Fantastic Four—occupy Hollywood’s imagination and production schedules, generate billions at the box office, and come as close as anything we have to a shared American mythology. This illuminating biography, Stan Lee: A Life in Comics, focuses as much on Lee’s ideas as it does on his unlikely rise to stardom. It surveys his cultural and religious upbringing and draws surprising connections between celebrated comic book heroes and the ancient tales of the Bible, the Talmud, and Jewish mysticism. From close readings of Lee’s work to little-known anecdotes from Marvel’s history, the book paints a portrait of Lee that goes much deeper than one of his signature onscreen cameos.
Liel Leibovitz took the time to talk to We Are Movie Geeks about his new book about one of his heroes..
Interview conducted by Tom Stockman October 28th, 2020
Tom Stockman: Hi Liel, your book STAN LEE, A LIFE IN COMICS is part of a series of books called Jewish Life. There are 22 books in the series. Did the publisher approach you about writing a book about Stan Lee or was this your idea? How did that all come together?
Liel Leibovitz: They approached me. They did not originally tell me what it was to be about. They took me to a lunch in New York and asked me if I would be interested in writing a book for this series. I told them I would be delighted to and then they told me they wanted the book to be about Stan Lee. And there’s me, this big comic book nerd since age seven, and I looked at the editor and waited for her to say she was just kidding. It was such a tremendous opportunity and I really can’t think of any other person that I have spent so many years of my life thinking about.
TS: The focus of your book is how so many of Stan Lee’s creations take their cues and influence from Stan’s own Jewish background and from traditional Jewish legends. Please talk about that and give some examples.
LL: Yes, to me what is interesting about Stan’s work; Spider-Man, Iron Man, The Avengers, etc is that they have become so massively popular in America not just because the movies have made billions of dollars at the box office, but because they have in some ways become part of an American mythology. So what I argue in the book is that basically if you go back and read some of Stan’s comics, they are successful because they are kind of retelling ancient biblical stories. For example you have someone like Spider-Man, who is suddenly given great power and refuses to use it to help his Uncle Ben, who of course gets famously murdered in the first issue of the comic book. Then Spider-Man must learn that with great power comes great responsibility and that he is indeed his brother’s keeper. It’s the same exact realization that the biblical Cain had, this notion that we are all responsible for one another and have to use our powers to help each other. There are so many other examples like this and what I do in the book is to go through them and show how the Marvel Comics Universe is a modern-day version of these very ancient morality tales.
TS: Some of these characters that Stan created certainly seem to have more self-awareness about their own weaknesses and hang-ups and fears and phobias, certainly more than Superman or the comic superheroes that preceded Stan’s creations. Do you think this was related to Stan’s Jewish upbringing?
LL: Absolutely it was related to his upbringing. He grew up in the middle of the depression. He saw his father lose everything. And I argue in the book that it is part of his deeply Jewish way of looking at the world. Everything is subject to argument and interpretation. There is a famous story in the Talmud that I recount in the book about a bunch of a rabbis that have an argument and one of them says “If I am right, let God himself come down and say so”. God comes down and says that that rabbi is correct. The other rabbis look at God and tell him that that might be his opinion up in heaven, “But here on earth we get to call the shots”. So I think Stan Lee captured the same kind of themes and elements to show that even the mightiest, wiser, strongest, seemingly perfect heroes also have quibbles and issues and problems that are not always universally accepted.
TS: Did Stan Lee as an adult talk much about his Jewish faith?
LL: Not at all. In fact so much so that it became clear that it was kind of an evasive tactic People noticed that and pointed out to him that some of these characters resemble characters in the Bible or that a line he had written in a comic book was reminiscent of a famous biblical phrase, He would just smile coyly and say “Really? I never noticed that“, but clearly it was something on his mind. I will say that after Stan became very famous for all of his creations, and was honored by Marvel Comics with a big gala celebration in Carnegie Hall, what he chose to do for the occasion was to get on stage in front of thousands of people and read a poem that he had written for the occasion. The poem was called God Cried which shows that, even though he vehemently denied any sort of biblical or spiritual matters all these years, God was never very far from his mind.
TS: I assume that you have seen all of the Marvel Comics Universe films.
LL: All of them. Several times.
TS: How would you compare the Jewish influence in the films to the comics?
LL: That’s such an interesting question because one of the things that was always interesting to me about Stan Lee’s Comics universe is that he was always interested in creating a world and environment in which minorities could be represented. Persons who are persecuted for their beliefs or appearance could be represented and when Stan Lee was writing in the 1960s and early 70s, those people were Jews. Now, 30 or 40 years later, Jews have risen up in the socio-economic spheres in America while still being very much a minority. We’re a minority that is doing financially much better there are new groups of immigrants, a tidal wave of newcomers to America who are taking their turn working their way into American society and culture. Now you see a lot of that in the comic books and also in the movies. Spider-Man for example is now a mixed-race boy from Brooklyn. He’s no longer the proto-Jew from Queens. To me, that is so wonderful and that was exactly the intention of Stan Lee, to show people what it’s like to be the outsider, the person who is not exactly sure of their place in society
TS: Let’s talk about you. You grew up in Tel Aviv.
LL: Correct.
TS: You said you were a comic book nerd beginning at age seven. Were comic books popular there in Israel the way they were in the US? Did they have comic book shops there?
LL: That was the source of so much frustration growing up because we watched what little American TV that did come our way. When I grew up in Israel (and it’s a much different country now) we had only one channel on TV. It was ironically called ‘Channel 1’, so we got glimpses of American culture and we knew that comic books were really cool. The Incredible Hulk TV show for example played really well in Israel. But there were no stores to go to, no place to actually buy comic books. The first time I came to America I was seven. I was with my parents on vacation here in New York and they took me to an amazing store in downtown New York, it still exists, called Forbidden Planet. We went there and I was so afraid they would ask me to leave that I grabbed every comic book I could get my little hands around and somehow convinced my parents to buy me this stack of comic books because I told them that this is the way that I would teach myself English. That ended up sort of being true. The amazing point is that when I got home I realized that these were all of the comic books that I was going to have for at least a couple of years so I studied them the way some rabbis study the Talmud.
TS: So you’re saying it was just impossible to get your hands on comic books in Israel?
LL: Eventually you could when I was a teenager.
TS: Were they translated into Hebrew or Arabic or were they in English?
LL: Oh they were all in English they were imported from America. None were printed locally
TS: Disney bought Marvel in 2009 for several billion dollars yet Stan’s paycheck after that was relatively modest. Why do you think Stan was not a better businessman?
LL: From the beginning, Stan’s contract was this very tenuous issue. He started working at Marvel Comics because his relative owned the magazine publishing company that also owned what eventually became Marvel. He became editor in chief at a very young age because everyone was sure this was a really dumb business and they didn’t care much about it and were perfectly fine with a 20 something-year-old being boss. When the company took off, which was 20 years later, Stan was in his 40s. He was already tethered to this contract which really didn’t give him rights over many of his creations. He was decently compensated, but if you think about this immense influence that he had over culture and all the money that his creations had made, there is no doubt in my mind that he deserved far more than he got.
TS: When did you write the book? Before or after Stan’s death?
LL: I finished my draft three days after he died.
TS: When I think about Stan at the end of his life I picture him sitting there at Comic Cons with thousands of fans lined up to plunk down $100 or more to have Stan sign their comic book. Why do you think he did that well into his 90s? Did he need the money or did he love his fans, or a combination of both?
LL: Look, I think Spider-Man is good and Iron Man is OK and the Incredible Hulk is fine, but I think Stan’s own greatest creation was Stan Lee. Very early on in his career, he realized that part of the thing that made Marvel so magical was that readers felt like they could actually be friends with this genial, approachable creator. He performed on college campuses and absolutely loved the adoration he received and understood that it was a rare treat for an artistic creator, which is someone who usually sits in a room at home and dreams of ideas and never had any real feeling of how readers or viewers received the work. For Stan, it was a real treat to be able to go into a room full of people and receive all that love and all that support. I think he did it out of pure love and pure joy and pure satisfaction. I’ve seen him at Comic Cons several times and the sort of exuberance that he radiated could not be fake.
TS: It’s good to hear that. Best of luck with your book and all of your future projects.
Film and television director Barry Sonnenfeld will be the keynote speaker for opening night of the St. Louis Jewish Book Festival on Sunday, November 1st. Visit stljewishbookfestival.org for the latest information.Ticket information for this online Barry Sonnenfeldevent can be found HERE
Barry Sonnenfeld’s outrageous and hilarious memoir Barry Sonnenfeld, Call Your Mother traces his idiosyncratic upbringing in New York City, his breaking into film as a cinematographer with the Coen brothers, and his unexpected career as the director behind such huge film franchises as The Addams Family and Men in Black, and beloved work like Get Shorty, Pushing Daises,and A Series of Unfortunate Events. Written with poignant insight and real-life irony, the book follows Sonnenfeld from childhood as a French horn player through graduate film school at NYU, where he developed his talent for cinematography. His first job after graduating was shooting nine feature length pornos in nine days. From that humble entrée, he went on to form a friendship with the Coen Brothers, launching his career shooting their first three films. Though Sonnenfeld had no ambition to direct, Scott Rudin convinced him to be the director of The Addams Family. It was a successful career move. He went on to direct many more films and television shows. Will Smith once joked that he wanted to take Sonnenfeld to Philadelphia public schools and say, “If this guy could end up as a successful film director on big budget films, anyone can.” This book is a fascinating and hilarious roadmap for anyone who thinks they can’t succeed in life because of a rough beginning.
A young Barry Sonnenfeld with his parents
Barry Sonnenfeld took the time to talk to We Are Movie Geeks about his book, his career, and of course, his mother.
Interview conducted by Tom Stockman October 11th, 2020
Tom Stockman: Hello Barry, so you’re promoting your book titled Barry Sonnenfeld, Call Your Mother.
Barry Sonnenfeld: That’s right
TS: What inspired you to write your memoirs?
BS: About 15 years ago, when I had nothing to do and just for fun, I wrote what would end up being one of the chapters of the book. I did nothing with it, it was just something to do. For ten years I had a column in Esquire magazine. The Editor–in-Chief of Esquire left and became a literary agent. He took me to lunch one day and asked me if I thought I had a book in me. So I told him about the story I had written 10 years earlier. That story was about my nine-day career filming nine full-length pornographic films. He said that if I could come up with two more stories, then we can sell it. So I wrote two more chapters. One on my fear of flying and one about being paged at Madison Square Garden while Jimi Hendrix was warming up to perform there. The page came over Madison Square Gardens PA system and everyone heard “Barry Sonnenfeld, call your mother!“ and that’s how the book got its title.
TS: Well that must’ve been embarrassing.
BS: It was profoundly embarrassing I was 17 years old and on a date with my high school girlfriend and there’s nothing worse than an entire section of Madison Square Garden chanting “Barry! Barry!“ as they could see me stand up and run to the payphone. That was in 1970.
TS: What was so important for your mother to have done that?
BS: She was worried about me. She told me I had to be home by 2am and it was 2:20am. First of all, it was amazing that she even got anyone to answer the phone at The Garden, and then get the message up the chain of command to get someone to announce it on the PA like it was a life or death situation. So asked her “Didn’t they tell you that the concert was still going on?“ and she said “Well they did, but they couldn’t prove that you were there.“ I was 20 minutes late for my arrival back home so she assumed that I was dead on the A-Train subway heading back up to Washington Heights.
TS: Was that typical behavior for her? What was your mother like?
BS: Yes, she was an overprotective Jewish mother. I was an only child. She said that if I ever went away to “Sleepaway School“ which most people call “college”, she would commit suicide. So I had to live at home for three years while I was in college. Then I could transfer as a senior to another college and my mother would commit suicide, so there I would have killed two birds with one stone. But then she reneged on her threat.
TS: If your mother were still living, what do you think she would think of your new book?
BS: The book is fairly mean to my parents but in the second to last chapter, I become nicer to them and explain some things. So she would probably read it, then cry for a while, then call me up and say “Oh Barry, Did you have to do that? “ She was proud of me but both of my parents were narcissists so they were both proud of me and competitive of me. I made eight appearances on the David Letterman show and each time I was on the Letterman show, my father would call me up afterwards and critique it like it was a one-man show and I could somehow make corrections to it the next day. He would say things like I seemed too nervous or I would cross my legs too much. I would just say “Thanks dad“. But my mother would probably be upset about the book, but at the same time enjoy the martyrdom and the fame of being ridiculed. It would be a mixed blessing, But the book iss pretty mean.
TS: Was your mother aware that you were working in the pornography industry?
BS: Not at the time. I went to graduate film school and discovered that I had a certain ability to be a cameraman. I had a basic understanding of how to light things and I had respect for certain lenses and how they were used. So when I got out of graduate film school, I decided that if I owned a camera, I could call myself a cameraman. So I bought a used 16 mm camera. This was long before the days of video of course. The buddy that I bought the camera with knew a producer of porno’s, so he got us a job shooting these nine feature-length porno film. But we could only charge them nine days of camera rental which paid for almost half of the cost of buying the camera. We did the porns so we could pay half the cost of the camera and make some money as crewmembers. But believe me, if you ever were to work on a porno movie, you would never want to watch one again. It was a truly horrific and unerotic experience.
TS: I can imagine. So your mother found out eventually?
BS: Yes I think my father was proud, but my mother was slightly horrified but everything I did was OK with her to a certain extent, so it all worked out.
TS: What did you learn shooting these porno film?
BS: It’s a very woman-centered business. The women have all the power because they can either help or hurt a man in maintaining an erection. I also learned that for all of these male actors, that’s their profession, that’s their living, and they’re good at it for the most part. Their problem is actually ejaculating so they could have sex for hours, but because they had to maintain that erection and avoid climaxing until we got all of those angles. It would take 10 minutes to do the dialogue for a scene, then 15 minutes to shoot various sexual positions and then anywhere from 3 to 4 hours of just taking naps and sitting around while the guy was getting ready to actually ejaculate. It was a very banal and depressing experience. Not what you would expect. There was no Joy or sexual excitement about being on a porn set.
TS: You went to NYU Film School in the 70s. Who were some of your well-known fellow students from that time?
BS: I was in the graduate program. There was an undergraduate program, and they were not related in the sense that they were on totally different campuses. In my class at NYU Graduate Film School from 1973 to 1976 there was Jim Jarmusch, Spike Lee, Bill Pope, another cinematographer who went on to shoot the Matrix movies. In fact he shot MEN IN BLACK Part 3 for me There was Susan Morse who left the film school to become an assistant editor and then went on to edit many Woody Allen movies. A guy named Barry Fanaro, who became the show runner and head writer for The Golden Girls. There were 26 students in my class and it’s amazing how many of them actually went on to have a successful career in the film business.
TS: How did you hook up with the Coen brothers?
BS: Totally by accident, but then again it goes back to me owning that 16mm Camera. I was at a Christmas party with a girl I knew named Hillary May. Joel Coen had gone to boarding school with Hillary. She had grown up in Connecticut, and there was all these people from Connecticut at this party and I really didn’t know anyone there. There was another guy there that I thought looked a bit like Howard Stern and he and I started talking. It was Joel Coen and he mentioned to me that he and his brother Ethan had just written their script for BLOOD SIMPLE. He said that he and Ethan we’re going to shoot a trailer as if it were a finished movie, with things like inserts in the back of cowboy boots, an abandoned road, things like that. No actors or dialogue. They were going to shoot this trailer and use that to raise money to make the film. They were going to show it to investment groups and people with money. They knew you can’t show a finished screenplay to an investment group that’s made up of people like doctors and dentists because they wouldn’t be able to read it and recognize it if was any good or not. By shooting a trailer and showing that to these investor groups they could think it looks like a good movie and something that they could invest in. The trailer showed that Joel and Ethan knew what they were doing and that it looked professional. Joel said that he was about to shoot this trailer and I told him that I owned a 16mm camera and Joel hired me on the spot. So I shot the trailer for them and it went really well. We became friends and it took about one year to raise the money for the feature which was $750,000. We had become such good friends that I was hired to shoot the movie. The first day on the set of BLOOD SIMPLE was the first day that either Joel, Ethan, or I had ever been on a movie set. None of us had worked our way up. Joel was never an assistant director or this or that. Ethan has never produced anything and I have never shot anything except those nine days of filming that pornography as well as a couple of short documentaries and industrial films. One of the things that I tell people in the book is to decide what you want to do in life, then figure out a way to do it. It’s something my dad told me so we decided that we were cameramen and producers and directors and followed through on it. None of us worked our way through the industry at all.
Barry Sonnenfeld with Joel and Ethan Coen
TS: When you were growing up were you a movie buff?
BS: Not at all! Joel and Ethan were, but I had no interest in the movies at all. It was just something that I discovered that I was good at. I thought that I wanted to be a still photographer. So there was the visual end of things that I really liked but I was not a movie buff. I rarely went to movies, even to this day. I am presently in Vancouver shooting a series for Apple, and the show’s writer keeps referencing these movie musicals and finally he stopped because he realize that perhaps with the exception of SINGIN’ IN THE RAIN or THE MUSIC MAN, I have never even seen a musical. But that has not stopped me from directing musicals. It’s been a lot of fun.
TS: Well maybe that’s why you have such a unique style to your directing. You were never trying to capture the style of a favorite director because you were never a movie buff. And that’s interesting.
BS: It is interesting and I think that more than movies, what influenced me the most in my shooting style is that I’m an only child. I think that with all of the movies that I both directed and was cinematographer on, there has been the camera, which is me. If you look at some of the films I’ve shot like RAISING ARIZONA or THREE O’CLOCK HIGH, or the Men in Black movies or THROW MAMA FROM THE TRAIN, The camera is definitely a character and has a point of view. I always say that the camera should be a storytelling device and not just a recording device. So many cameramen and directors use it just to record a story instead of using the camera to help tell the story in terms of camera moves or angles or how to design a scene for the most visual impact. So yes, I don’t feel like I am emulating some other director that I studied when I was growing up or anything like that.
Barry Sonnenfeld directing Will Smith in MEN IN BLACK
TS:If someone were to make a film based on your memoir Barry Sonnenfeld Call Your Mother, what actor would you like to see play you and who would you like to see play your mother?
BS: Even though he is dead, the person that I could see best playing my mother is Vincent Gardenia.
TS: You’d like to see Vincent Gardenia play your mother?
BS: Yes. You heard me Vincent gardenia would have perfectly played my mother. Roger Ebert could have too, but Vincent is a better actor so I’m going to go with the dead Vincent Gardenia for my mother and I’ve had several discussions already with Max Greenfield to play me, although he is way better looking. One time I was on the David Letterman show, and you know they pre-interview ahead of time. I talked about my mother a lot, about being paged at Madison Square Garden, and told them about some other stuff. The night I was going to be on the show, the producer told me that they would like to talk about my relationship with my mother but he was worried that it could get kind of harsh. I told him to tell Dave to go wherever he wanted and I would follow, so he started to bring up my mother and I told him that Vincent Gardenia could be my mother’s photo double. What I didn’t know was that Dave was going to cut then to a photo of Vincent Gardenia. That got a big laugh. My mother was still alive at the time and I told him “my mother has more facial hair“. So again, my mom got to be a martyr and her friends would call and ask her how Barry could say such a thing. She got so much attention that it was sort of a mixed blessing for her.
TS: What projects are you working on now?
BS: I just started shooting this new show. The first day of shooting was last Friday. It’s for Apple and it is a six-part musical comedy with a great cast. Cecily Strong from Saturday Night Live, Keegan-Michael Key, Kristin Chenoweth, Alan Cumming, lots of great actors. In addition to that, I am in development with several other television ideas. I’ve really enjoyed working on television for the past five or six years, more than I did working on films. I directed half of the episodes for the show A Series of Unfortunate Events for Netflix over three years. One thing I have in development is that Warner Bros. has optioned my book Barry Sonnenfeld Call Your Mother. Max Greenfeld has already agreed, if it ever gets picked up, to play me. I’ve got some other projects that are not off the ground yet, but nine out of ten of these things never happen. You can develop a lot, but very few of these things ever really go all the way from an idea to a finished product.
TS: Your last theatrical film was NINE LIVES which I had some positive things to say on our site’s podcast at the time. I rather enjoyed that film.
BS: Thank you. I think that film didn’t know what it wanted to be. It was not juvenile enough to be a movie for children and it had some mature themes but not enough to appeal to adults. It fell between a rock and a hard place. I really enjoyed working on that film with a girl name Malina Weissman, who I ended up working with again on A Series of Unfortunate Events. I also enjoyed working with Jennifer Garner and Christopher Walken, who has always been one of my heroes.
TS: I thought Kevin Spacey was a bit oddly cast in the lead of NINE LIVES.
BS: Kevin was already cast before I came aboard that production I was not involved in his casting. I’ll leave it at that.
TS: How has the Covid and the shutdown affected things for you?
BS: It’s definitely affected the industry. I’m in Vancouver right now and it is one of the safest cities and the studio has a protocol in place so there are different zones when different people are allowed on the set. When the actors come in, the rest of the crew, the grips and electricians, have to leave. We have to rehearse to something they called a ‘witness camera’ so all of the people that would normally be on the set, like the stand-ins, have to watch from another room. So this all slows things down a little bit, Everyone gets tested three times a week but I’m surprised it hasn’t slowed us down more.
TS: You live in Colorado, correct?
BS: Actually my wife and I just sold our house in Colorado. it was on 62 acres and we loved it. We were at 10,000 feet though, and frankly living at that elevation starts to wear on you, It’s harder to sleep, it’s harder to recover from illness. So my wife and I have bought property here in Vancouver and moved here. We’ve bought a 42 acre farm which we call Green Acres because we are city folk living on the farm.
TS: Is it true that you have a private bathroom designed to look like a public bathroom complete with stalls and urinals?
BS: No. We did not design it to look like a public bathroom. That rumor got started because I’ve always been a big believer in the urinal. It’s the end of the husband and wife discussion of seat up/seat down so for the last 20 years, whenever we’ve built or bought a house I’ve always put in a urinal.
TS: Best of luck with the book and all of your future projects. Thanks you taking the time to speak to me today. I have been a fan of your work for many years.
BS: It’s been my pleasure.
On Sunday, November 1st, Barry Sonnenfeld will speak about his new book Call Your Mother: Memoirs of a Neurotic Filmmaker. Now in its 42nd year, the Festival is nationally recognized for both its excellence and its size – it is one of the largest in the country. People from all backgrounds and faiths come to Festival events to hear premier speakers on topics such as history, music, politics, cooking, family, religion, sports, and more. This year, the Festival expects to attract even more people through its accessible online format. The Jewish Book Festival, which runs November 1-8, is a program of the Jewish Community Center. Festival-goers can take advantage of the Premier Pass, which grants access to all Jewish Book Festival Events in November including preview events before the official start.. Passes will go on sale September 1st. Visit stljewishbookfestival.org for the latest information on summer events leading up to the festival.