Guest Blog: Wyatt Weed, ‘Retro Dreams’

wyattweeddirecting1

Retro Dreams: Director Wyatt Weed ponders the state of film and how he got here.

For most people, dreams don’t come true.

Sure, sometimes you marry your childhood sweetheart, or get the job that you really wanted, the one with the great benefits and the sense of security, but rarely does the childhood dream come true: astronaut, president, secret agent.

For me, the dream has come true – and it is an amazing experience to be aware of it as it happens.

When I was 5, man landed on the moon. I was enthralled, and subsequently committed to being an astronaut for at least the next 6 years – until I saw a movie called “Jaws”, that is. Jaws made me aware of movie making and movie magic, but what I gravitated toward was oceanography. I was obsessed with the study of sharks for at least the next two years of my young life.

Then 1977 rolled around, and with it came the one-two punch that did me in: a little film called “Star Wars”, followed 6 months later by another little number called “Close Encounters of the Third Kind”.

That was it – the pure bolt of lightning that cut into my soul. I borrowed a Super 8 camera from my next door neighbor and began recreating shots from Star Wars. My life soon became all about those 2 minutes and 47 seconds of film that were packaged into those plastic cartridges, 10 dollars to buy and process, one cartridge at a time, month after month, year after year.

I had found my calling, and that was to be a filmmaker, a director, and for years that obsession stayed with me. As a matter of fact, it is what I do today.

I sometimes lament the age in which I was born – I reason that if I’d have been born twenty years later, I would have grown up with digital cameras and home computers, and because of that I imagine that I would have been the next Spielberg by now.

Then in my more calm moments I realize that the reality is quite different. I was a child of the 60’s and 70’s, and that meant that I got in on the last gasp of Hollywood’s Golden Age, in a time when the studios and the networks still made big entertainment.

What do you mean, big entertainment? “Transformers 2” is big, you say, and there are a lot of huge movies out there – Harry Potter, Iron Man, The Dark Knight. Fair enough. But today’s Hollywood is not big in the way that my Hollywood was, my Sunday night television was, my Saturday morning was. I saw 2001 in a theatre in 1968. I sat glued to a television in an age before VCR’s and DVR’s, studying every second of The Ten Commandments, The Great Escape, and Ice Station Zebra. I didn’t blink – if you did, you missed it.

I remember The Doors performing “Light My Fire” on the Ed Sullivan show. I remember the last season of Star Trek, the one with William Shatner. I remember Scooby Doo before Scrappy. I remember Sealab 2020 before Cartoon Network re-wrote it and added a “1”. I remember every single frame of Johnny Quest – did you know that Race Bannon’s first name is Roger, and that he was born in Wilmette, Illinois?

Back in that time, an entire family gathered in front of the television, discussed what they saw, and commercials were when you dashed to the bathroom, grabbed an ice cream float, and quickly returned to your spot on the floor. Your attention span was different, your priorities more attuned. There was no pause, no rewind.

You were in the moment. And The Brady Bunch was a show you could actually identify with.

These days, the very technology that has allowed me to have a career is linked to the same technology that allows you to read this very blog, and I find it both a blessing and a curse. I find I don’t watch television as closely as I used to, because with my DVR, I can rewind what I didn’t catch, re-listen to what I didn’t hear. Sometimes I will pause the show and begin a conversation – because I know that I can. And sometimes I don’t like myself for doing it. Similarly, if I miss that movie while it was playing the theatre, I don’t panic, because it will be on DVD in 4 months, cable in a year or so.

But I digress. The point is that digital technology allowed my dream to come true, even as my retro, avocado-green past caught up with me. Allow me to explain…

After going as far with filmmaking as I could in the St Louis area back in the 80’s, I moved to Los Angeles in 1988 and tried my hand at everything – acting, special effects, writing, producing, and directing. In the early acting days I scored a bit on “Star Trek: TNG” and was one of a dozen Predators who faced down Danny Glover at the end of “Predator 2“. As an effects artist I assisted in destroying North Viet Nam in “Flight of the Intruder”, helped Gonzo the Great become one of the “Muppets from Space”, and was responsible for getting Val Kilmer back aboard Mars 1 in “Red Planet”, just to brag about a few. OK, I helped crash the 747 at the beginning of “Mission: Impossible 2” as well, but don’t make any Tom Cruise cracks – he was a good boss. Didn’t try to shove Scientology down our throats once, I swear.

Then came the long-awaited directing career. Hrrrrrm…..

After an aborted attempt to get a science-fiction film off the ground with a company that shall remain nameless, I got my chance to direct a pilot for television. That show, “Star Runners”, was based on the Eclipse Comics title “Fusion”. The finished show was actually purchased by Universal, who promptly shelved it. It is a pilot you will never see, but don’t blame Universal – it was one of those “creative differences” things that you always hear about, one that I’ll explain in detail someday over a beer…

Next came some sweet second-unit gigs for Steve Wang, the creative madman who brought you “Guyver: Dark Hero”, “Drive”, and the current Saturday morning show “Kamen Rider: Dragon Knight”. Steve is the bastard child of Jackie Chan and James Cameron, and I learned a lot from him, surely enough to win my first directing gig on a feature, right?

Wrong.

Raised in the Midwest, I was taught a certain ethic – work hard, do a good job, and you will be rewarded. In Hollywood, if you do good work, they don’t want to move you up because they’ve already identified you with that position, and don’t want to lose you from that position. Plus, if you’re really talented, moving you up could be more of a threat than it’s worth. Add to that the fact that I was well into my thirties, and by Hollywood standards that made me an older guy who couldn’t possibly understand what kids these days would want. Why would you give me millions of dollars?

Sure, if you’re already in there, like Spielberg or Bay or Cameron, you keep working, but when is the last time you heard about a director getting his first film at the tender age of 45?

The 1950’s, that’s when.

So time moved on, and in 2003 I had the pleasure of working with an executive producer named Robert Clark on a feature entitled “Guardian of the Realm”. I was involved as a co-writer, a 1st assistant director, and as an editor and effects supervisor. That digital project taught me a lot – we wrung that Cannon XL-1s for every pixel it was worth, squeezed all of the editing juice out of that G-4, and got that movie onto Showtime and out onto DVD.

Now it’s 2006, and Robert Clark wants to do this again, but he doesn’t like LA. No, Robert wants to make another feature, but he wants to do it back in our mutual hometown – St. Louis. Would anyone be interested? Would I be interested?!?

Oh god, was I interested. In actuality, I had come to dislike LA over the years, and knew that my biological filmmaking clock was ticking, so I bailed on LA.

Actually it was more like I packed up and drove away screaming “I just want to live!!!”, channeling the late Sam Kinison as I did so. In late 2006 I began writing a script about a female vampire with amnesia, and in the summer of 2007 we began shooting a feature in 24p HD with a used Varicam.

Tech heads will get that. The rest of you, look it up. Point is, digital technology allowed me to make my first feature economically and with great control. We edited at home. We shot pick-ups, inserts, and miniatures in the garage. The living room became a photo studio. My bedroom was converted into a sound booth.

Along the way, I realized several things. First, if I had made a feature in my 20’s, I would have blown it. If I’d done it in my 30’s, it wouldn’t have been as good. Making the film in my 40’s, however, I was calm, confident, focused, and studied. I remembered what filmmaking was about, and some days I even enjoyed myself. The final film isn’t perfect, but I’m proud of how it turned out.

The main thing I realized, though, was that I had truly come home – it was my childhood all over, with my sense of joy and wonder returned to me. It was like shooting super 8mm in the backyard, but this time with a better camera and more training. I was capturing the thrill of creation again, pure creation, and loving every long, painful, low-budget minute of it. I was living my Hollywood, with my sense of big, my sense of how the world was…or should be. My old retro lessons had stuck with me all of these years, and now they were serving me well. I had made a film that I wanted to see, and might have seen on Saturday evening creature feature back in the days when the Beatles still played together.

My first feature, “Shadowland”, opens theatrically today at Landmark’s Tivoli theatre in St. Louis. From there it will play other towns, maybe at a theatre near you. If you happen to see it, I hope you feel the hand-made care that we put into it. If not, maybe you’ll like the next one that we do.

Regardless, I sit here a happy camper, looking back across the past 40 years of my life, contemplating the enormous circle that lead me here, to my dream.

And it’s pretty damn cool.

Guest Blog: Rick talks ‘Transformers’

ricktalkstransformers

Please Note: We Are Movie Geeks associates themselves with Rick as little as possible. Outside of the fact that everyone knows him, most of us don’t agree with anything he says. He is only able to still post things here due to contractual obligations that will be ending soon, we hope. Please take everything here with a grain of salt, as its meant to be funny and his knowledge of movies is that of a toddler(if toddlers were into porno).

First let me say that the first ‘Transformers’ movie got me all hot and bothered from watching Megan Fox fix cars, talk dirty mechanic talk, and wear those skimpy little shirt. It was like the beginning of a “handy” but never finishing it. I thought that finally I was going to get the “big reward” with this new movie… I didn’t. Asshole.

I think a more appropriate title for this movie is “Trans -I want to form her” because Megan Fox is the only reason to see either of these movies. Honestly, I would have given ‘Revenge of the Fallen’ a 5 out of 5 if they split the screen in half and one side was on Megan Fox in this outfit the entire movie:

meganfoxmotorcyclerevengefallen

Unfortunately for myself and everyone else in the audience Michael Bay didnt do this, he decided to just blow shit up(surprise) instead of having more provocative, scantly dressed scenes that feature Ms Fox. This leads me to believe he has no interest in women, and instead would like to marry a pyrotechnic instead, maybe Danny McBride’s character from ‘Tropic Thunder’, sideburns and all.

Shia Labeouf turned in his best “don’t call me Lewis, because I am an adult now” impression but just fails at it miserably because I still him as a 10 year old yelling at Christy Carlson Romano. Actually here is an idea Michael Bay, for ‘Transformers 3’ lets ditch Shia and lets have a Megan Fox/Christy Romano driven film… Hell, you can even leave out the Transformers too!

meganfoxchristyromano

I am drooling all over my keyboard at the thought of such a pairing. I am going to go ahead and predict now that a movie starring both of these ladies would open at probably around 295 million, but that just a rough estimate.

Michael Bay also apparently has studios so far up his ass that this movie could have been 7.5 hours long and still would have been put out as is. In the course of ‘Revenge of the Fallen’ I ate a late lunch and dinner, plus had a few late night cocktails before the film was done, the only thing that would have made it better is watching it with Megan Fox next to me..maybe playing with my earlobe and then taking me out for ice cream afterwords.

Seriously though, how the hell do you get away with having 6 minutes of story and 2 hours 24 minutes of non stop, over the top(sounds good right? its not), we recycled sequences from my last five films, action that gets utterly ridiculous and tosses stuff in that obviously doesn’t belong. Through most of the entire damn film you cant tell where one Autobot starts, and the endless supply of Decepticons ends.

Also, how much did James Cameron charge them to plan out the ship sinking scene that mimics the Titanic to a t, except the fact that there was no Kate Winslet at the bottom?

To make things worse there is this:

michaelbaybank

Yes Mr Bay, we all know you are going to make an ass ton of money off this one. Even our negative reviews wont sway people from seeing this movie because the promise of loud noises, and possibly half naked Megan Fox. People will see ‘Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen’ for the same reason that people still make it out to see movies like ‘Dance Flick’, ‘Disaster Movie’, and all of the other ridiculous movies that call themselves movies in their title.

Do yourself a favor boys and girls, go out and see Duncan Jones’ ‘Moon’ if its playing near you instead. Dont ask questions, just do it (Nike didnt sponser that).

‘Mandy Lane’ Gets Dumped Again

mandy-lane

What does an excellent horror movie have to do to catch a friggin’ break, these days?   Shot in 2006 and making it’s US debut at SXSW in 2007, ‘All the Boys Love Mandy Lane’ is a film that has been getting release dates pushed back as if its actual release marked the end of the world.

Directed by Jonathan Levine, who has guest blogged for WAMG in the past, ‘All the Boys Love Mandy Lane’ was last set to get a release on July 17th by Senator Distribution.   However, word comes today that Senator has pulled the film, and it finds itself in release date limbo once again.   Senator did not give any specific reasons why they pulled the film from their release slate, but rumors abound that Senator is in its finals days.   The New York-based company may be closing shop sooner rather than later.

The film got its UK release over a year ago, and, thus far, it has picked up $1.6 million worldwide.   That’s double the film’s budget, and, with all the hype it’s gotten just sitting on a shelf in some distribution companies closet, imagine what it could pull in were it to actually get a release date.

Amazing to think that ‘The Wackness,’ Levine’s follow-up to ‘Mandy Lane,’ was shot, edited, and released since his first film was completed.   Not only that, we are coming up on the one-year anniversary for the release of ‘The Wackness.’   This is getting ridiculous.

If you are one of the people out there who have seen ‘All the Boys Love Mandy Lane,’ you can attest to the fact that it is a solid entry into the horror genre.   It is exponentially better than most of the crap that gets half-assed releases straight to DVD or on the Sci-Fi network.   If you happen to be affiliated with a distributor, and you are reading this, please do the world of horror a huge favor and pick this movie up.   You will not regret it.

Source: Shock Till You Drop

Guest Blog: Rick talks ‘Star Trek’

rickguestblogstartrek

Editors Note: Even though a lot of people are fan’s of Rick, we definitely are not. He uses a lot of foul language and can be offensive at times. If you decide to continue reading this, read at your own risk. If you don’t know who Rick is, he is part of the world famous Twin Brother Male Stripping duo known as Rick and Roddy. You can see more on http://rickandroddy.com

That ridiculous intro probably turned more than a few people away from this write up I am about to do, lucky for me my man juice is strong enough to bring them back.

Since the beginning of time there have been Trekkies and that is one thing that really creeps me out about this new ‘Star Trek’ movie. A bunch of guys sitting in their mom’s basement on the internet, and playing with their vulcans. Some people ask “Rick what do you have against Trekkies?”. Well its simple, I was doing a show a few years back at a Star Trek convention and I was viciously attacked(he stuck his hand in my pants and felt up little elvis like he was going out of buisness) by this asian man named George who said he was one of the original members of the show. Its just like these Trekkies to really think they are really part of the show or movies.

Since then I have had a hatred for these crazy bastards, and it also doesnt help that William Shatner smells like spam spread and cabbage patch dolls. I was doing the convention circuit a few years ago and he is such an attention whore they booked him on a male stripper tour. Our tables were right next to eachother and the entire time he would sit at his table trying to think of “Shatner facts” sort of like the “Chuck Norris Facts”. This is one that he came up with:

William Shatner can play “does it fit” with any inanimate object, especially your mom.

Sadly every one of the ones he came up with ended with “especially your mom”.

So to answer your question, No I am not excited about this new ‘Star Trek’ movie if for no other reason than a new group of Trekkies will crop up. Of course I could be wrong, I thought the Twilighters were pretty bad but some of those little gothic vampire girls look great wearing nothing at all, only after they turn 17 of course. If you get passed the fact they want to call you Edward the entire time, these girls young women are crazy little freaks in bed.

Guest Blog: Rick talks ‘Wolverine’

rickguestblog

Editors Note: Even though a lot of people are fan’s of Rick, we definitely are not. He uses a lot of foul language and can be offensive at times. If you decide to continue reading this, read at your own risk. If you don’t know who Rick is, he is part of the world famous Twin Brother Male Stripping duo known as Rick and Roddy. You can see more on http://rickandroddy.com

That intro was the ultimate in douche-baggery, but whatever it takes for me to spread my seed wisdom all over you guys then I will deal with it.

So ‘Wolverine’ (yes, I am too lazy to type out the entire name) comes out tomorrow and the question everyone keeps asking me is “Whoa dude, are you excited to go out and see this movie since it features the big buff stud, like yourself, Hugh Jackman?” The answer is NO… Hell no… absofuckinlutely no.

I really liked Jackman in the first 2 X-Men movies before Brett Ratner came and put his stink all over “X3” or as I like to refer to it as “Brett Ratner fucked with me and now I suck as a movie because he sucks at life”. Since then Jackman thought it would be a great idea to star in a movie with the same name as his home country. You don’t see me starring in movies called America, or United States(I did star in a movie once called ‘United States of well hung studs’ but I don’t count that), so why the hell would you be in a movie called ‘Australia’. Ill tell you, its to land poon. You only do movies like that to land way more poon then you were getting before however that still doesn’t justify it in my books because now he is just being stingy. Save some for the guys that don’t   have accents Hugh, you asshole.

Although this movie also stars Liev Schreiber, I think Tyler Mane would have been a better Sabertooth… oh wait, he already was. I am however pretty excited to see Ryan Reynolds as Deadpool. It will be the first time I have seen him since he married my sloppy seconds… tastes good huh? You have my number Scarlett Jo, so you know what to do.

All in all I would say my excitement level ranks up there with ‘High school Musical 3’, and ‘Hannah Montana The Movie’. This will definitely be no ‘Road House 2’, and Hugh Jackman will never be half the man that Jake Busey is.

Editors Note number 2: Sorry you all had to sit through that, hopefully Rick didnt offend too many of you.

Guest Blog: Actor or Movie Star?

The Oscar Nominations are in… and as it all begins to sink in (the snubs and surprises), WAMG brings you  this insightful  article from someone who’s actually worked in the industry (Paramount, Warner Bros., various indies and TV shows), Panda Hugger.

Actor or Movie Star?

by Panda Hugger

Once again, we are smack in the middle of one of Hollywood’s most exciting seasons – Oscar season – and judging by the buzz around certain movies, and certain actors, it should turn out to be a pretty good one. But it also looks to be one that will nicely, but begrudgingly, conform to a little theory of mine which is, “there are actors and then there are movie stars, and there is a difference.”

Let’s start with the actors. Obviously there are too many great actors to list, but for this purpose, we are talking about A-List actors: those who maintain an extremely high profile, who are able to carry a movie on their name alone, are in high-demand and that have true box-office power. But more importantly, they have been able to break out of the pretty-boy, commercial, “movie-star” persona and become real actors – possessing the ability to “become” the character they are playing, making you forget the celebrity on the screen.

Exhibit A: Brad Pitt – Yes, Brad Pitt has had his share of “fluff” movies. Thelma and Louise, Cool World, Johhny Suede. But these were early in his career and they were short-lived. Soon after, he proved his acting mettle with A River Runs Through It, Kalifornia, Interview With The Vampire, and Legends of The Fall. These were the roles that got him noticed. Roles that made directors want to cast him because, not only could he fill seats with his matinee-idol good looks, but because he was quietly becoming a damn good actor. In Se7en, and 12 Monkeys, he made you believe he was Detective David Mills and mental patient Jeffrey Goines and he was rewarded with an Oscar nomination for the latter.

To his credit and Hollywood’s delight, Brad Pitt has since managed to float effortlessly between light, big budget, Hollywood, mass-appeal movies (Troy, the Oceans trilogy, Mr. and Mrs. Smith) and more serious and interesting roles (Seven Years in Tibet, Fight Club, Babel). Pitt earned his second Oscar nomination today for The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. This time it’s a long overdue Lead Actor nomination. There isn’t much doubt that an Oscar is in the very near future for Brad Pitt.

Other examples of this type of A-list actors are Denzel Washington, Russell Crowe, Johnny Depp and Tom Hanks. At first glance you see movie stars, but upon closer inspection, you find really good actors with a combined 16 Oscar nominations and wins. They have managed to escape the “movie-star” pigeon hole, something that unfortunately, some other pretty good actors have not, and maybe never will.

Exhibit B: Will Smith. Like most movie stars, Will Smith has had his fair share of luck. He started out as a hip-hop artist, and had moderate success. He was able to parlay the appeal of his rapper persona “The Fresh Prince” into his own network sitcom that far eclipsed the success he had as a rapper. Building on that commercial, household name appeal, he fearlessly attempted the move to feature films. His first few movie roles were while he still had the safety net of his show, which was at the half-way point of 6 seasons. He had the security to attempt serious roles in Where the Day Takes You and Six Degrees of Separation. After both somewhat forgettable releases, Smith returned to the comfort and huge paycheck of network television. It wasn’t until the end of the 6th and final season that Smith realized how he would make the successful transition to film – the action comedy and the summer blockbuster. Both Bad Boys, (with Martin Lawrence) and Independence Day were hugely successful and the mega-movie star Will Smith was born. Deciding to strike while the iron was hot, Smith continued on his successful streak with Men in Black, Enemy of the State, and Wild Wild West. The next few years were a mish mash of big budget sequels (Men in Black 2 and Bad Boys 2), a return to serious roles (The Legend of Bagger Vance), and the much hyped Ali, for which he received his first Oscar nomination. A second nomination followed in 2006 with The Pursuit of Happyness. But here’s the problem. Will Smith was so successful in establishing himself as a bona fide movie star, that his utter star power, likability, and box-office record (almost 2.5 BILLION to date) have overshadowed his acting ability. While I think Will Smith is a good actor, when watching his films I never totally forget that I am watching Will Smith. He never quite makes the audience believe that he is the character. The physical transformation he made to become Muhammad Ali was amazing, but in the end, it was Will Smith doing an impression of Muhammad Ali, and the Oscar slipped away.

Other examples of this kind of movie star are Leonardo DiCaprio, Jim Carrey, John Travolta, and Tom Cruise. These are mega-stars that, with only 8 Oscar nominations between them, have never received the recognition for acting that they probably deserve – and not for lack of trying. There have been the obvious snubs, but mostly, as with Will Smith, the curse of being “too big” of a movie star to be taken seriously as an actor is all too real. But kudos to all them for continuing to put out quality work. It could pay off eventually, miracles do happen. Just ask Robin Williams.

Sundance 2009: Jonathan Levine talks Sundance

Jonathan Levine, director and writer of “The Wackness” sits down and talks about Sundance with us..

Since Sundance is going on right now, Scott asked me to reflect on my Sundance experience from last year, when my film “The Wackness” premiered. With a year’s hindsight, the experience was pretty awesome.
At the time it was, well, intense. First of all, as soon as we got there and moved into our condo, everyone got sick. Once everyone was good and sick, we had our premiere. As it was the first time we’d screened the movie for anyone, the premiere was nerve-wracking for me. Add to that the pressure of finding a distributor, and the fact that Quentin Tarantino was in the audience, and I was a total mess. Luckily, it went well. The audience seemed to like it, and at the party afterwards a few distributors expressed interest. So we partied. I didn’t think I drank a lot, but the altitude makes you get drunk faster, so I guess I got kinda drunk.

The next morning, after waking up hungover (I think I took my shirt off, and I can’t remember if I said anything inappropriate to Harvey Weinstein), we did a lot of press, walking down Main Street with our cast, having fun with Sir Ben and Method. (the coolest dude in the world, but when an old white photographer lady called him “Mos”, he did not respond well). At this point, we still didn’t have a distributor. I was confused and a little bummed, because my first film (which, ironically, still has not been released in the US), sold the
night it premiered for a lot of dough. This seemed to be a much tougher road. Then came our Eccles screening. It was magical. You could feel a great energy in the room, reverberating all the way to the back of the giant theater. When the movie ended and we got a standing ovation. Â  It was one of the most thrilling things I’ve ever experienced.

That’s the thing about Sundance: if you get caught up in distributors reactions and parties and seeing Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian (I don’t know who she is but I think she’s like Paris Hilston) and all that, you will have a miserable time. But beyond all that, there’s a moment when the lights go down, when an audience is watching your movie—that’s electric. The audiences there are incredible: loving, curious, generous. (I’d like to take a time out from this posting to recognize the fact that Obama became president today. That makes everything better.)

As the days wore on, me and the producers met with some distributors. The tide of public opinion was helping generate more interest in our film, and I was starting to feel a little better, primarily due to the
fact that companies were giving me free shit like shoes and furry hats. So we met a few different companies at our condo. We weren’t in a rush. We wanted to find the right people, because we had been burned
before. Within a few days, we had made a deal with Sony Classics, and we were very happy with them and their intentions for our film. A few days later, we won the Audience Award.

It had been a whirlwind week, and although I felt like we got beat up a bit at the beginning and then drove triumphantly into the sunset, neither of those things were true. We were in a little bubble known as
Park City, where things seemed much more intense than in the “real world”. What was important was that we were there in the first place. We got to hang out with our friends, with festival programmers. We got
to watch and talk movies. We got to connect with the audience, an audience that likes their movies different, challenging, unique. If you look at the weekly box office charts, you’ll see that the rest of
the world doesn’t always feel that way. That’s why Sundance is so important: to remind us that the best of American movies, and of all cinema, are films that have a uniqueness of voice and vision. A year
later, I miss it. I’ve been reading about what sounds like a crop of great films, from “500 Days of Summer” to “Push” to “Black Dynamite” to “Don’t Let me Drown”. I can’t wait to see all the wonderful new voices launched by this festival. That’s why Sundance is essential. And that’s why it’s good. Â  Also people there give you free shit. That is also good.

how was your weekend?

mine was good.   i did not see the mummy.   i did not see dark knight again. or swing vote. i watched real genius on DVD and went to see Dolly Parton in concert. which seems weird, but both those things were pretty fun.   really looking forward to pineapple express this weekend!

speaking of which, NY Times did this slideshow of stoner movies through the ages:

http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2008/08/03/movies/0803-HARR_index.html

of course, nothing can touch dazed and confused–but i was thrilled we were on the list!

this video’s cool:

think that’s all for now.   i’ll hit y’all up in a few days!

jon

Jon Blogged This

I’ve never written a blog before. primarily because i’m not very interesting. But, IÂ  want lots of people to go see my movie (The Wackness, in theaters now and opening in more and more each week) and Scott has given me this forum. So, I’ll do it. Maybe it will be fun .

Since I don’t know much about blogging, I decided to go to my favorite celebrity blog for tips:

http://www.johnmayer.com/blog

For those of you who don’t know John Mayer, he is a musician who gets to have sex with Jennifer Aniston, which makes me jealous but I suppose I’m happy for him and also happy that someone is having sex with Jennifer Aniston, cuz if no one did that would be a shame. But he doesn’t blog about it, which is bullshit.

OK. Now I will just talk about some of the more exciting things that have happened to me over the last few weeks:

I went on a press tour to promote the movie. The press tour essentially includes press days in several cities, meeting and talking to a lot of people, and ordering a lot of room service. Often one says the same things over and over again. Its very exhausting but also a great opportunity to spread the word about the movie. I got to go to cities I’d never been to, like Seattle, Minneapolis, Chicago. Now I know that those cities have nice hotels and very similar porn on PPV.

Howard Stern liked my movie. Someone sent me an mp3 of him talking about it. I love Howard Stern, so that really meant a lot to me. That’s a very cool part of making a movie. People actually watch it. And those people include, sometimes, Howard Stern.

The guy from Hardball did not like my movie. He was watching it at the Nantucket Film Festival and walked out because he was supposed to have dinner with John Kerry. I don’t know that he totally hated it but he seemed real grumpy. That’s OK, though. Not sure he’s in the target audience anyway. That said, I like his show and I would read his blog no questions asked.

These days, I take meetings every day about new movies or tv things or writing gigs. I’m trying to make sure I capitalize on the fact that I have a movie out and also trying to make sure I don’t go broke again. Being broke in Los Angeles sucks–and I’m very lucky to have started getting paid for movie work, so I don’t want to mess it up.

I am writing a script for Sony that is an adaptation of the spy novel Echelon Vendetta. I got notes from the studio executives today. I was terrified, but the notes were all really smart. Now I have to be smart enough to incorporate them into the script.

OK. That’s all for today. I will try to keep this updated every couple days with exciting information. thanks for the opportunity, guys. I hope this is vaguely interesting. if not, i will start making shit up, like the fact that i dropped acid with John Mayer last night. seriously.

maximum respect,
Jon

Â