SLIFF 2017 – “And The Winners Are….”

The Urban Chestnut Beer poured freely (because it was free) at the Urban Chestnut Microbrewery  in the Grove neighborhood inSt. Louis last night. It was the closing-night party for the 26th Annual Whitaker St. Louis International Film Festival where the slate of audience-choice and juried-competition winners were announced to an attentive crowd.
SLIFF presented four major filmmaking awards during the course of the 2017 festival:
Charles Guggenheim Cinema St. Louis Award to Dan Mirvish; Women in Film Award to Pam Grier; Lifetime Achievement Awards to Sam Pollard; and the Contemporary Cinema Award to Marco Williams.

Tribeca Film Institute’s IF/Then Short Documentary Pitch Competition

Tribeca Film Institute, in partnership with SLIFF, sought short documentary projects by filmmakers living and working in the Midwest for its new IF/Then Short Documentary Program, made possible with support from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Five projects were invited to enter the IF/Then pitch competition earlier this afternoon. A jury then met to determine the winner of up to $20,000 to finish their film and a one-year distribution initiative managed by Tribeca Film Institute.
If/Then Pitch Competition Winner:  “Bridges” directed by Sohib Boundaoui and produced by Assia Boundaoui
If/Then Honorable Mention (and $1,000 cash prize): “On the Bit” directed by Ashley S. Brandon and produced by Nevo I. Shinaar
Interfaith Awards
Juries gives Interfaith Awards to both a documentary and a narrative, choosing from among 10 competition films (five in each category), which were selected for their artistic merit; contribution to the understanding of the human condition; and recognition of ethical, social, and spiritual values.
The 2017 winners:
Best Documentary Feature: “Voices Beyond the Wall: Twelve Love Poems from the Murder Capital of the World”by Bradley Coley
Best Narrative Feature: “Mawlana” by Magdi Ahmed Ali
Midrash Award
Midrash St. Louis engages myriad aspects of American culture – hot topics, deep subjects, music, arts, and film – and seeks to give and receive commentary on the subjects and issues that matter to people in St. Louis and that form and shape our views and lives. The Midrash St. Louis Film Award celebrates St. Louis-related films of honesty and artistry that portray the need or the hope for reconciliation or redemption. These are among the most powerful and worthy themes that films should explore. Eligible work for the Midrash St. Louis Film Award includes feature and short films largely shot in St. Louis or directed by filmmakers with strong local ties. The award comes with a cash prize of $500.
The 2017 winner: “For Ahkeem” directed by Jeremy Levine & Landon Van Soest
Shorts Awards
Juries choose the winners of seven awards from among the shorts in competition. The SLIFF shorts competition is officially sanctioned by the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences, making the winners in the Best of Fest, Best Animated, Best Live Action, and Best Documentary categories eligible to submit for Oscar®consideration.
The 2017 winners:
Best Documentary Short: “Crown Candy” by Kamau Bilal & David Wilson
Best Local Short: “Sanctuary” by Ashley Seering & Cory Byers
Best Short Short: “The Shadow” by Isaac Switzer
Best International Short: “Wicked Girl” by Ayce Kartal
Best Animated Short: “Cerulia” by Sofía Carrillo
Best Live-Action Short: “Flip the Record” by Marie Jamora
Best of Fest: “Yes, God, Yes” by Karen Maine
St. Louis Film Critics Association Joe Pollack and Joe Williams Awards
In conjunction with the St. Louis Film Critics organization, SLIFF holds juried competitions for documentary and narrative features. The awards are named in honor of the late St. Louis Post-Dispatch critics Joe Pollack (narrative) and Joe Williams (documentary). The winners are picked by two juries composed of St. Louis film critics. SLIFF chose eight films to compete in each category.
The 2017 winners:
Best Documentary Feature: “When I Was 6, I Killed a Dragon” directed by Bruno Romy
Best Narrative Feature: “Black Cop” by Cory Bowles
New Filmmakers Forum Emerging Director Award (The Bobbie)
The New Filmmakers Forum (NFF) annually presents the Emerging Director Award. Since its inception, NFF was co-curated by Bobbie Lautenschlager. Bobbie died in the summer of 2012, and SLIFF honors her memory by nicknaming the NFF Emerging Director Award as the Bobbie. Five works by first-time feature filmmakers competed for the prize, which includes a $500 cash award.
The 2017 winners:
Special Award for Outstanding Performance: Olajuwon Davis, “Palacios”
Emerging Director Award (“The Bobbie”): “Becks” by Liz Rohrbaugh and Dan Powell
Best of Fest Audience Choice Awards
Audience voting determines the winner of three awards from among the films in competition.
The 2017 winners:
 
Leon Award for Best Documentary Film: “Gabe” by Luke Terrell
TV5MONDE Award for Best International Film: A sensual, transcendent tale of first love – adapted by James Ivory from the acclaimed novel by André Aciman, this highly regarded film debuted at 2017 Sundance Film Festival. “Call Me By Your Name by Luca Guadagnino


Best Film: Based on the memoirs of Fanny Ben-Ami, this inspiring film is an incredible tale of bravery, strength, and survival – the story of a daring young girl who will stop at nothing and fear no one. “Fanny’s Journey” by Lola Doillon

SLIFF 2017 Review – MUNE: GUARDIAN OF THE MOON


MUNE: GUARDIAN OF THE MOON screens Saturday, Nov. 11 at 11:00am at The Missouri History Museum (5700 Lindell Boulevard) as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival. This is a FREE screening. 

As legend has it, the first Guardian of the Sun threw a harpoon into the cosmos and roped the sun to bring light and warmth to all of humanity. Then the Guardian of the Moon lured the moon to the Land of Darkness to provide a balance to the sun and supply the world with dreams. At a momentous ceremony to appoint the two new guardians, an accident seems to occur: The heir apparent is passed over, and the title Guardian of the Moon is bestowed on the waif-like Mune, a small and frightened forest faun who seems wholly unprepared to take on such a weighty responsibility. This news excites Necross, the nefarious ruler of the Underworld, a corrupted ex-guardian who decides to take advantage of Mune’s weakness and steal back the sun for himself. Now it is up to unlikely hero Mune and his friend Glim — a headstrong young girl with wax for skin — to save the sun and restore order to the world. A breathtaking new adventure from the producers of “The Little Prince,” “Mune” features a star-studded voice cast that includes Patton Oswalt, Rob Lowe, Christian Slater, and Ed Helms.


Review of MUNE: GUARDIAN OF THE MOON by Cary Paller:

MUNE: GUARDIAN OF THE MOON is the story of  an unlikely hero coming of age to save the world.  The hardest part about almost every studio that makes an animated feature, outside of Walt Disney Studios, has to deal with is the story.  Almost all the of them lack in that area.  Most come off and feel like B movie level material instead of pushing the story to something feels original and has depth.  Mune, kind of falls in the middle of it all.  The Animation switched from good computer CGI to rough edgy hand drawn looking style. Which gave the film an interesting feel to it.  The style kept changing as part of the plot at the just right moments when the story seemed to lack.  Now for the story, it really was the weak link.  The characters all seemed to be carbon copies of all the great Walt Disney characters.  I cannot say it made the film bad, but it kept the film from becoming any better than a direct-to-video Walt Disney spin off.  It is really a shame that so many production companies spend so much time on the Animation and so little time making sure the screen better than average.  For all the flaws in the film it still will be an enjoyable experience for the younger crowd.  There are so many sequences  filled with great visuals and some fun, silly dialog along with the usual banter between the hero’s and villain’s.  I am glad I saw it.  It is very hard work making  an animated feature.  Go see the film, support the filmmakers and enjoy the final product in the theater where it should be seen.

SLIFF 2017 Review – SLACK BAY

 

SLACK BAY screens as part of the 26th Annual Whitaker St. Louis International Film Festival on Saturday, November 11 at 2:45 PM at Landmark’s Plaza Frontenac Cinemas. For ticket information click HERE. it also screens at the same venue on Sunday, November 12 at 5:15 PM. For ticket information click HERE.

In the mood for a frantic fast-paced farce filled with slapstick with a French flavor? Then pack your bags, or at least grab a bag of popcorn, and escape to the sandy beaches and rolling waves of SLACK BAY. It’s set in 1910, just as modern technology was creeping in via the “horseless carriage”. The story focuses on two families at the opposite ends of the economic spectrum. We first meet the poor but proud Bruforts headed by patriarch L’Eternel who make their main living as oyster and mussel farmers. But in order to make ends meet they also operate a ferry for the vacationing “swells” to cross a wide shallow stretch of water. L’Eternel and his tall, lanky teenage son Ma Lout either shuttle folks across in a canoe or carry individuals, “across the threshold”-style to the dry land. However, they’ve got another way to put…ahem…food on the table (a most unusual diet, indeed). One of the families that make use of their ferry service is the Van Peteghams who occupy a swanky vacation home high in the hills. Their head of the household is the doddering Andre (Fabrice Luchini) along with his jittery wife Isabelle. Their two teenage daughters, Gaby and Blanche are there along with cousin Billie, who alternates male and female attire (a flowing dress in the morning, a crisp suit and tie in the afternoon). Their routine is upending by the arrival of more relatives (they’re a really, REALLY close family). First is Isabelle’s wildly eccentric brother Christian, followed by Andre’s melodramatic sister Aude (Juliette Binoche), mother of Billie. Not far from the estate, the local authorities, led by corpulent Inspector Machin, are investigating several missing Bay visitors. Add to the mix a romance between Billie and Ma Lout, and the stage is set for complete comic chaos.

 

Several different story threads are kept in motion like a vaudevillian’s spinning plates by director/ screenwriter Bruno Dumont. The surly, quick-to-violence Bruforts snipe and squawk while stuck in squalor. Meanwhile the boorish Van Peteghams berate their servants and wreak havoc while trying to have fun (sand-sailing for one). Literally bouncing between them is the husky Machin who gasps and wheezes before rolling down inclines like a careening boulder. Luchini’s Andre is stuffier, stammering take on the “upper class twit” from the Python gang. And Binoche gets to cut loose in a “go for broke” comic performance full of fluttering swoons and wild-eyed mugging and shrieks. The calamities cruise toward a startling climax which literally takes flight into the realm of far-flung fantasy. For those who think French cinema is oh so somber and serious, the loopy SLACK BAY should make them change their (loony) tune.

SLIFF 2017 Review – SURVIVING HOME


SURVIVING HOME screens Saturday, November 11th at 12:30pm st The Tivoli Theater (6350 Delmar) as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival. C0-directors Jillian Moul and Matthew Moul will be in attendance. Ticket information can be found HERE

In honor of Veterans Day, SLIFF offers a free screening of SURVIVING HOME, an intimate documentary that follows four veterans over an eight-year period as they rebuild their lives after war. Interwoven with their stories are veterans’ voices from across the United States. The film’s principal subjects had vastly different combat experiences and challenges, and they’ve taken equally diverse paths on their difficult journeys to recovery. A World War II vet is part of a generation that stoically resists talking about their experiences. A Vietnam vet becomes a Buddhist monk in an attempt to reconcile his guilt over the people he killed. A severely burned Persian Gulf and Iraq War vet, who lost an arm on his fourth tour of duty, still wishes he could go back into combat. And a female Iraq War vet suffers less from the trauma of war than from the sexual assault she experienced at the hands of her “brothers.” Through perseverance, humor, inner reflection, strength, and a determination to help others, these vets overcome many obstacles, but the road ahead continues to bend in unexpected ways. Their unique paths of healing and discovery shed light on the long-term burdens of war and reveal the miraculous power of the human spirit.


Review of SURVIVING HOME by Stephen Tronicek:

What happens to people when they get home from the military or the Army? What happens when those profoundly attached to stressful experiences return to common society? Many films of this day attempt to answer this question, as more and more is brought to light about the way that the stressful environment of war can affect people. Thank You For Your Service, American Sniper, and The Hurt Locker have all included ideas of this, attempting to show the audience the flaws of our handling of these broken men and women. While those films may be admirable attempts to depict this issue, this film being about real people and about real situations hits profoundly hard.

SURVIVING HOME is beautiful in a way, a cry for understanding from those who have suffered at the hands of PTSD and other more physical scars. A cry for understanding for the people who actually go to war, presented in a way that makes it almost impossible to seem jingoistic because it presents simply the truth, flaws and all. Whereas fictional stories, such as the films mentioned before, are in some way forced to frame the events of war in a specific way, most stepping into either the reality that war is a nightmare or the idea that war is noble. Surviving Home, being a documentary, seems to frame it a little bit of both. Military life can be a rich, fulfilling option for many, but is a living nightmare for many people, both in the war and outside of the war.

The subjects, as often in a good documentary, are really incredible. Robert Henline is a wonderful, funny, man burned but strong. The documentary focusses mainly on his story of overcoming the wounds that he has both physically and mentally. There is also the story of a woman, whose wife is not given military benefits and her fight to gain those benefits. These are combined with different other stories about attempting to become people again. They all take pride in their service and want to think that all of it is noble, but they understand the violence that they imparted to others and how this broke them down. It is this understanding that makes the film so beautiful and encouraging.

SURVIVING HOME is an enriching documentary, reaching the types of sad and sentimental heights of something like the work of Spielberg. It reaffirms some hope in the frustrating darkness of the issues that it is covering. If you have the time, I’d gladly hope for you to see it and gain some more respect for the people who have served our country.

SLIFF 2017 Interview: Rebecca Cammisa – Director of ATOMIC HOMEFRONT


ATOMIC HOMEFRONT screens Saturday, November 11th at 3:00pm at The Tivoli Theater (6350 Delmar) as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival. Director Marc Meyers will be in attendance. Ticket information can be found HERE.

St. Louis has a little-known nuclear past as a uranium-processing center for the atomic bomb. Government and corporate negligence led to the dumping of Manhattan Project uranium, thorium, and radium, thus contaminating North St. Louis suburbs, specifically in two areas: the communities along Coldwater Creek, where residents have high rates of very rare cancers, birth defects, and various autoimmune disorders; and in Bridgeton, adjacent to the West Lake-Bridgeton landfill, where an uncontrolled subsurface fire has been moving toward an area where the radioactive waste was buried. Just Moms STL, a group of mothers-turned-advocates, believes their communities are being poisoned and demands that the government either fully remove the waste or permanently relocate residents living nearest the landfill. At the same time, the grassroots organization Coldwater Creek — Just the Facts Please is working to educate the community and healthcare professionals and to promote community inclusion in the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act. ATOMIC HOMEFRONT — from HBO Documentary Films — spotlights these engaged citizen advocates.


ATOMIC HOMEFRONT director Rebecca Cammisa took the time to talk with We Are Movie Geeks before the screening of her film at The St. Louis International Film Festival.

Interview conducted by Tom Stockman October 25th 2017

Tom Stockman: What inspired you to make this film about the nuclear waste problem here in Missouri?

Rebecca Cammisa: I can’t say that inspiration is really the proper word. When I got there I tried to learn if there was a problem and what the problem was, and if what people were claiming was true. A lot of the time with making our film was going back-and-forth between Coldwater Creek communities and The Bridgeton landfill communities and to try to understand the dynamic of what took place in the past and what was happening presently. Once we started to understand, and to get more involved, that’s when the inspiration came. We understood that people were really suffering with this and struggling while trying to get to the truth.

TS: How did you hear about this issue?

RC: I heard about it from a geologist who was familiar with the situation at the landfill.

TS: How much time did you spend in the St. Louis area making this film?

RC: We were there collectively about eight months. It was initially a six month stretch, and then several weeks going back-and-forth.

TS: There was another film about this subject, THE SAFE SIDE OF THE FENCE by Tony West. I think it would make an interesting companion piece to your film. It was more the history of Mallinckrodt, with much archival footage. Your film is more the human side of the result.

RC: Yes, the thrust of our film is a look at the current situation, the current ongoing toxicity that these residents are fighting.

TS: Did you reach out to representatives of Mallinckrodt?

RC: Our film was never really about Mallinckrodt. We were able to build Mallinckrodt’s presence without their input. None of these companies or federal agencies would speak to us so we have a long list of those who refuse to go on camera. But we never even approached Mallinckrodt, because we never really got into their role that deeply. We really focused on the present fight.


TS: When was this filmed?

RC: We started filming in August 2014 and finished November 2015.

TS: Have you been traveling to a lot of film festivals with ATOMIC HOMEFRONT?

RC: Yes, the film just played in Santa Fe, Hot Springs Arkansas, West Virginia, Boston, and elsewhere. It played in Denver, which is important because Denver is struggling with plutonium poisoning. We’re about to start our theatrical run this week in Los Angeles, then in New York a couple of weeks after that.

TS: How has your film been received so far?

RC: I think people are shocked, This is an under-reported story. When people see the film, they assume that this is a St. Louis problem and it’s not. It’s a problem shared by many communities throughout the nation so I think this film is going to make people aware. For example, we are now in Los Angeles and we just had a screening for the International Documentary Association. In California next month, Southern California Edison is planning on burying 1,800 tons of high-level radioactive waste on a beach. There’s a community of people trying to stop that from happening. Wherever we go, there’s a radioactive issue. When we take the film around, we try to localize it for the communities where it’s being played.


TS: What was your filmmaking background before you started this project?

RC: I had made six previous documentaries, and one short narrative.

 TS: Would you like to break out of the documentary genre and move more towards narrative?

RC: I would be interested in narrative filmmaking if the story itself was important and pertinent.

TS: Where did you grow up?

RC: I’m from upstate New York

TS: When did you begin to realize you wanted to be involved in filmmaking?

RC: I was exposed to film a young age. I remember wanting to make movies when I saw PANIC IN NEEDLE PARK when I was 7 or 8. I didn’t go to film school though. I didn’t make that a career goal. I became a photographer and transitioned from photography to filmmaking, so it just happened naturally.

TS: Who are some documentary filmmakers that have inspired you? There are a lot of them.

RC: Frederick Wiseman certainly. Stanley Nelson is an incredible documentary filmmaker, an amazing storyteller. There are so many whose films I grew up watching that have inspired me.


TS: Did you enjoy your time in St. Louis when you were here filming?

RC:  I loved St. Louis. Any opportunity to go back there, I would take it. We came into people’s lives there when it was the worst time of their lives, and they were so generous to us, and they really trusted us. The people I have met there have been graceful under pressure and still are. It was an honor to have spent time in St. Louis.

TS: What’s your next project?

RC: I have a couple of ideas that I’m looking at, and I’ve been offered some opportunities, but because ATOMIC HOMEFRONT looks at just the tip of the iceberg of this problem, we have been heavily focused on outreach, trying to connect with the community and trying to understand their issues. That takes a lot of time and that’s what I’m focused on now

SLIFF 2017 Interview: Marc Meyers – Director of MY FRIEND DAHMER


MY FRIEND DAHMER screens Friday, November 10th at 7:00pm at The Tivoli Theater (6350 Delmar) as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival. Director Director Marc Meyers will be in attendance. . Ticket information can be found HERE.

Before Jeffrey Dahmer became one of the most notorious serial killers of all time, he was a teenage loner. Conducting grisly experiments in a makeshift backyard lab, Jeff was invisible to most, until his increasingly bizarre behavior unexpectedly attracted friends. Based on the acclaimed graphic memoir by cartoonist John “Derf” Backderf — who was a teenage friend of the nascent serial killer and nearly became his first human victim — MY FRIEND DAHMER chronicles the origins of the man, the monster — and the high-school senior. Ross Lynch portrays Dahmer in a performance that Paper Magazine describes as “haunted, sad, scary, and unforgettable,” and the exceptional cast includes Anne Heche, Vincent Kartheiser, Dallas Roberts, Alex Wolff, and Tommy Nelson. Variety hails the new film from director Marc Meyers — a two-time SLIFF alum with “Approaching Union Square” and “Harvest” — as “a serious and audacious attempt to dramatize the inner life of a sick puppy when he wasn’t quite so sick” and declares that “‘MY FRIEND DAHMER is disturbingly compelling and original … the movie that Gus Van Sant’s ‘Elephant’ wanted to be: a humanizing dissection of teen psychosis.”


Director Marc Meyers took the time to talk to We Are Movie Geeks before his film MY FRIEND DAHMER screens at The St. Louis International Film Festival.

Interview conducted by Tom Stockman October 24th, 2017

Tom Stockman: Have you been to St. Louis before?

Marc Meyers: Yes, my first feature, APPROACHING UNION SQUARE was in the new filmmakers showcase there a few years ago and that’s where I met everyone associated with SLIFF. They showed my next film, HARVES, as well.

TS: How does your new film MY FRIEND DAHMER differ from other movies about serial killers?

MM:  The biggest distinguishing factor is that it’s based on a graphic novel that was written by a guy, Derk Backderf, who grew up with Jeffrey Dahmer. They were friends in high school. So it’s not only from that unique perspective, but it’s about the days before the stories that we know him for, before he became a serial killer. It’s about his experience in high school. It’s his embryonic stage, the making of the monster.

TS: Have you ever seen DAHMER starring Jeremy Renner as Jeffrey Dahmer?

MM:  I did watch it once to see how much my ideas might overlap.

TS: It would be a good companion piece to your film as it takes place a few years later than yours.


MM:  Yes, there’s another chapter of his life that I’m aware of. In between Dahmer which is the area of his life he is most known for; going to the gay clubs and what he did to some of these men. He also went to college but got kicked out. He joined the military and got kicked out of that as well. So there’s another sequence there. My film is about his experiences in high school and also about his family life. It’s sort of the marriage of these two worlds that Jeff is living in. His home life, where his parents marriage is dissolving around him, and also at school where he’s a lonely kid. He finds a way to attract some other oddballs in high school and they form a club called the Dahmer Fan Club. That became their identity as a group where they would pass the time finding ways to disrupt the high school like many oddball kids might in a town where there’s not much else to do.

TS: Do you remember when the publicity about the Dahmer crimes happened?

MM:  Yes, I remember when all of that played out in the news. I was in college at the time so following the news was not a priority, but the news was everywhere, even worldwide.

TS: Was Derf Backderf involved in the script for your film?

MM:  No. Abrams ComicArts is the publisher of his graphic novel and there’s a lot of great information about Derf’s book at their site.

TS: What were some of the challenges in adapting a graphic novel as opposed to making a film based on your own scripts?

MM:  The other three films I made were original scripts from my own stories and those had their own challenges. Here we had an existing story of fact that is sometimes weirder than fiction. The book was a great roadmap. The challenges there we’re how to dramatize a nonfiction graphic novel. There are obviously some visual qualities to a graphic novel that you can see as cinematic potential in certain areas. At the same time, you have to take what is a factual book and find dramatic devices to accomplish the same emotional spirit that the book is communicating. So my agenda was to be loyal, but also to honor the original story in a way that people who knew the book, and also people who didn’t, could all watch the movie and be entertained. It’s a different medium so it calls for different devices to be at play. We have to condense the timeline of events happening because you really can’t tell a story that takes place in a high school over four years. You need to tell a movie in a shorter period of time.


TS: Some directors who make movies based on graphic novels intentionally compose their shots the way they are drawn in the graphic novel. Did you do that what did you consciously avoid that?

MM:  People that know the book will recognize some of the imagery in the film. But my film is very naturalistic and authentic. I even shot in Akron, Ohio where these characters grew up including at Jeffrey Dahmer’s real home. We brought the crew and actors there for a little over a week for scenes based around the house. There’s that true authenticity, but when my script adaptation and the book overlap, I used part of the panels from the graphic novel as inspiration in my story board. There’s a way to remain loyal but I didn’t do what some other graphic novel adaptations do like include animation or other visual references from the novel, or give it a pulpy sensibility just to make it comic book-like. For me, it was about telling a story set in 1977 and 1978 and making it a period piece and sort of a time capsule. There’s no voiceover and there’s no looking back from now to then.

TS: Let’s talk about this actor playing Dahmer, Ross Lynch. He had starred in a lot of Disney Channel and Nickelodeon-type of shows. Did you cast him to sort of play off of that image?

MM:  No, I cast Ross because I honestly thought he was the right actor for the role. I know that people are finding it fascinating that there is this alliteration from Disney to Dahmer, but he’s not the first great actor to come out of Disney. These are young talented guys that are performers from very early age. They’re working in their profession and though I may not have been watching the shows that they were on, I definitely knew that there was a pool of talent there. I met with over 100 actors for all of the main teenage roles. Once I met with Ross, I locked in on him and felt he was right. He’s originally a dancer and also an actor and a singer so I knew that he would understand the physicality of the role, the gate, the posture. He’s an amazing performer and a really talented actor. After a couple of sessions with him, it was clear to everyone to everyone involved in the movie that he was the right pick.

TS: Where did you grow up?

MM:  I grew up in Peekskill New York, about an hour north of New York City. It’s now called Cortland Manor but it’s very much a bucolic area that to me was very reminiscent of the environment that this movie is set in. I could relate to living in a suburban town that was very similar.


TS: Did you grow up a movie buff?

MM:   I grew up watching movies but I was never someone who swore they were going to grow up and be a movie maker. I first found my love of writing. That’s what brought me to New York theater. From there I started to improve my skills and realize that I really like working with actors. I had been making little movies in my backyard just for fun so I suppose it was always part of what I was doing, I wasn’t just waving the flag and claiming that that’s what I was going to do.

TS: Are there some filmmakers that you admire and that have influenced you?

MM:  Yes, it goes in waves that it has to do with what kind of project I’m trying to do next and one other filmmakers I find that have done and I gravitate to for a range of reasons to see how they’re doing certain things.

TS: Whose work did you look at while you were planning MY FRIEND DAHMER?

MM:  I looked at a bunch of teen movies just to see how teen films had changed from the mid-80s when I was growing up.. From THE RIVER’S EDGE and the John Hughes films to more recent stuff like THE FACULTY and current stuff, movies that are a little more glossy and hyper-smart. But I wanted to make something that looked and felt like it was something from the 70s. I knew I would have a Steadicam so I looked it how P.T. Anderson used it and moved the camera around on a lot of his movies. Krzysztof Kieslowski, the way he moved the camera in his movies such as BLUE, WHITE, RED, and THE DOUBLE LIFE OF VERONIQUE. I also love Spielberg and Cassavettes. Kubrick has been on my mind a lot lately.

TS: How has MY FRIEND DAHMER been received so far?


MM:  It’s been playing wonderfully. I’ve shared the film across the United States at various film festivals. St. Louis is the last US film festival where I will be with the movie. I just came back from a trip where I showed it at the BFI London Film Festival and at Sitgest in Spain, which is the largest genre film festival in the world. What’s interesting about the movie is that it is been programmed and shared in the genre community, and at prestige film festivals, and also the LGBT film festival community as well because he’s known in some areas as the “gay serial killer”. It’s been an interesting crossover.

TS: What’s your next project?

MM:   I’m interested in other true life stories; I’m looking at another graphic novel. This is the first film I’ve made where I was doing things with genre devices and I really enjoyed that, so I may do some more of that. But there’s not one title right now that I can share.

TS: Good luck with your next project, whatever it is, and will see you November 10 at the St. Louis international film Festival and your screening of MY FRIEND DAHMER.

MM:  I’m looking forward to it.

SLIFF 2017 Review- THE WOMAN WHO LEFT

 

THE WOMAN WHO LEFT screens as part of the 26th Annual Whitaker St. Louis International Film Festival on Thursday, November 9 at 7:30 PM at Landmark’s Tivoli Theatre. Ticket information can be found HERE

THE WOMAN WHO LEFT is a sprawling epic dealing with revenge and redemption, second chances and missed opportunities, inspired by the works of Leo Tolstoy. Ah, but here’s the twist: the setting is the Philippines circa 1997, when the local news was filled with horrific tales of kidnapping and extortion, along with the return of Hong Kong to China. But this is a more personal story centering on middle-aged Horacia (Charo Santos-Concio), now in year thirty of her long prison sentence after being convicted of murder. She’s settled into her fate, becoming a mentor/ teacher to the other inmates. One day she is shocked when her the warden tell her that she’s free. Horacia’s close friend and cell mate Petra confessed to the murder. She had been hired by Horacia’s spurned former lover Rodrigo Santiago to commit the crime and frame her. Horacia implores the warden not to speak of her release, then hops on a bus to her old home. After finding out that her husband has passed away she re-connects with her daughter. When she’s told that her son has gone missing, Horacia travels to another village to continue the search for him. Seems that Santiago is living in the same village, which sets her on a path of revenge. Along that path, Horacia befriends an aged street vendor, an eccentric homeless woman, and an epileptic transvestite prostitute.

Director/screenwriter Lav Diaz captures the raw, gritty feel of life on the streets with wide-angle camera work (in shimmering silver black and white), unadorned by background music, replaced by the near-constant flow of scooters and motorbikes. Said camera is “locked down” for most scenes, letting the dialogue flow naturally during long uncut sequences, making the film feel more like a play (or two, since the film clocks in at just under four hours). Diaz also gets wonderful, compelling, natural performances from Santo-Concio and the heart-breaking John Lloyd-Cruz as the tormented street-walker Hollanda. With the script’s twists and turns (and quirky detours), THE WOMAN WHO LEFT is an engaging tropical island spin on crime and punishment.

SLIFF 2017 Interview: Ron Stevens – Director of NEVER SAY GOODBYE – THE KSHE DOCUMENTARY


NEVER SAY GOODBYE – THE KSHE DOCUMENTARY screens Saturday, November 11th at 2:00pm at The .ZACK (3224 Locust St.) as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival. This is a FREE event.


In director Ron Stevens’ NEVER SAY GOODBYE, you’ll see the history of KSHE’s heyday, from its beginning in 1968 throughout the 1970’s and up to 1979. Hear never-before-heard stories from your favorite DJs: John Ulett, Mark Klose, Ron Stevens, Radio Rich, Joe “Mama” Mason, Gary Kolander, and many more. With appearances from Rodger Hodgson (formerly w/Supertramp), Poco, Mama’s Pride, Ozark Mountain Daredevils, and so much of the music you grew up with.

Ron Stevens’ took the time to answer some questions about NEVER SAY GOODBYE for We Are Movie Geeks in advance of the screening at this year’s ST. Louis International Film Festival:

Interview conducted by Tom Stockman

Tom Stockman: What inspired you to make a documentary about KSHE and how long has this project been living in your head?

Ron Stevens: Two years ago I began thinking about the fact that KSHE was quickly approaching its 50th anniversary.  That’s when I began mentally toying with the idea of producing this documentary.  It occurred to me that 50 was a lot of years to celebrate and the early years would be less significant to current listeners who were not even born yet.  So over lunch with KSHE’s General Manager John Beck, Program Director Rick Balis and Operations Manager Tommy Mattern, I suggested as much and they all disagreed, saying that their younger listeners were very much fascinated with the 70’s and were hungry for KSHE history.  In September of 2016, I decided to take the plunge, drop everything else in my life and charge in head first to produce this documentary.  That’s when I first met with KSHE over lunch that day to let them know my plan.  They asked if I wanted them to pay for it and I said no because I thought it was important to maintain creative control of the story.  They pledged their dedicated support (probably out of relief that they didn’t have to pay for it) and gave me everything I asked for over the last year to make it happen.  Within a month I was able to assemble an amazing crew that shared my enthusiasm for the project and begin the long, long process of producing a full-length documentary. My inspiration to make the documentary was two-fold:  First, my knowledge of the history.  I knew there was a good story there and I wanted it to be told. Secondly, the amazing enthusiasm of so many others who wanted this story to be told.

TS: What were some of the unexpected challenges you found as a first-time filmmaker?

RS: The challenges were mostly technical.  I had spent the previous thirty years telling stories in short form for radio with the radio syndication company I ran.  Joy and I were syndicated in over 700 cities around the world, delivering short form comedy bits on a daily basis to these radio stations.  Each comedy bit was a form of storytelling that, like Twitter, required us to convey a message in as few words as possible.  Like a stand up comedian, we needed to structure a joke to give just enough information so the punchline made sense to the listener.  That was great basic training for telling stories.  Also, during our years in Los Angeles in the 1980’s, I produced and directed a one hour video comedy special written by me, Joy and Alan Wenkus (who was later nominated for an Oscar for co-writing STRAIGHT OUT OF COMPTON).  That was my first attempt at directing and editing long form video.  Surprisingly, we sold it for a lot of money; but it was 1985 when video companies were hungry for comedy.  When I retired four years ago, I formed OnStL here in St. Louis to produce short form videos about our wonderful city and the people who make it great.  That, too, was great training for this project.  But nothing really prepared me for the technical and organizational skills necessary to interview 44 people, ending up with 38 hours of interview material, and somehow edit that down to 95 minutes (94.7 minutes, to be exact), focusing on one general theme, keeping it interesting throughout. Fortunately, some of the crew members who joined me on this venture had many years of technical experience, along with the incredible patience, to guide me through the jungle.  In particular, our Director of Photography, Jack Twesten, was there encouraging me, teaching me and guiding me every step of the way.  He made it possible for me to focus on creative.  Others, like Joe Mason of Mason Communications (also knowns as Joe “Mama” Mason during his KSHE days), moved the project along after I completed editing, to give it the true professional final touches. The real UNEXPECTED challenge came with music licensing.  Who knew what a mess that world can be!  Most of the great music of rock and roll is owned by a handful of companies.  They basically control it all. So to use, say, 9 seconds of White Rabbit from Jefferson Airplane, first you have to determine who actually owns the song. That alone can soak up weeks.   We negotiated for 6 weeks with Sony for a song they claimed they owned, but didn’t.  One day they called and said, “Hey, turns out we don’t own the song.  Sorry.”  Six weeks down the drain, start over.  The publishing company, once they know they actually own the damn song, doesn’t really care so much that you’re only using 9 seconds of their song.  They want $1,500 for the use, plus other fees if you’re going to enter the film into a film festival, show it on broadcast tv, screen it publicly at a movie theater, and on and on.  Then, when you FINALLY get it all worked out … you get to do it all over again with the record label that owns the master recording.  So, using 9 seconds of a song can take several months and a few thousand dollars. Fortunately, I had two things in my favor: One, I had many rock stars who wanted to help.  Those who still owned their own music, like JD Blackfoot, simply gave me the rights, no questions asked. The power of KSHE.  Two, I had Lorren Cornelius.  I met Lorren when he was a gofer at KSHE in the 70’s and I was Program Director.  We both moved to Los Angeles in the 80’s and became good friends. Lorren became a top record executive and music producer in those years.  He’s still working and living in Florida and he offered to take over this nightmare of music rights.  I never had so much fun listening to this guy yell and scream at presidents of record labels, fighting for this little ol’ documentary.  So, when you hear the recognizable songs in the documentary, thank Lorren and a few others who helped along the way. I should also point out that the generosity of many, MANY St. Louis musicians who grew up on KSHE and were inspired as musicians by KSHE made it possible to have great music THROUGHOUT the film.  The list is long and their contributions to this story should not go unnoticed.


TS: Was there anyone you wanted to participate in the documentary that didn’t want to or that you could not track down?
RS: Good question.  I actually had to turn down several rock artists, simply because of time.  I was pretty much able to locate everyone who worked at KSHE for any significant time from 1967 to 1977, the timespan of the story.  Peter Maer, who went on to become White House correspondent for CBS, flew in from Washington DC for his interview.  Richard Palmese, who went all the way to President of MCA Records, flew in from Los Angeles to be interviewed.  Richard Fendleman (Richard Fendel), who owns his own production company in Florida, conducted his interview from there, and Bill Addison, the very first voice heard on KSHE when it first came on the air in 1961, flew in from his Florida home to participate.  These guys truly went out of their way at their own expense to be a part of this story.

TS: Tell me about your years at KSHE?

RS: I lived out my dream there.  I, like everyone else back then, was hired with no previous experience in radio and was pretty much left to do whatever I wanted.  That’s the heart of this story: how everyone working at KSHE from 1968 to 1976 had no previous experience in radio, including our boss, Shelley Grafman.  The odds of a rock & roll radio station surviving under the conditions and circumstances we worked are laughable.  But we didn’t just survive, we created a station that became known around the globe by 1976.  I had the honor of being at the heart of this story as it happened.  Then, like a lot of us who worked there back then, I spent the rest of my life reaping the benefits of this amazing bootcamp for life.  I was paid, supported, encouraged and rewarded for playing rock music and finding fun, creative, profitable ways to share it all with everyone my age growing up in St. Louis.  Imagine that.


TS: You met your wife at KSHE. Tell me about that.
RS: Joy “In the Morning” Grdnic showed up like a bolt of lightening in a quiet winter storm.  She had more creativity, more guts, more sense for adventure than any of the guys working there.  And she was a beautiful, sexy blond.  Again… what are the odds? What are the odds that such a person could ever survive this male pig pen of rock & roll radio?  She didn’t just survive, she took us all to a whole new level and gained the friendship and respect of every “guy” in the building in the process.  We all loved her, but I fell in LOVE with her in every way imaginable.  I was head over heals.  We began living together within a year of her employment at KSHE and were married in 1974 while we both worked there.  We found out a year after our wedding that everyone at KSHE had bets on how long our marriage would last.  To add insult to injury, no one bet over 12 months.  Ha!  It’s been 44 years now.

TS: What made KSHE stand apart from other rock stations in the ‘70s?

RS: Shelley Grafman.  He was the brother of the president of Century Broadcasting, Howard Grafman.  Before Howard asked his brother to take over running the station, Shelley was selling insurance policies door-to-door.  Shelley was in his early 40’s and a father of four young kids. In any way you can imagine he was not the right choice to run a rock FM radio station in 1968, when he took over.  Within a year, any on-air personalities with experience were gone and kids right out of high school who shared a passion for the music were hired.  Steve Rosen, Gary Bennett, Don Corey were either still in high school or recent graduates.  “Sir” Ed Rickert was in college.  Shelley did the unthinkable.  He hired kids and let them actually run the place.  No rock station or ANY radio station dared to do this.  He trusted and respected us.  He recognized our talents and nurtured them.  He made sure our voices were heard.  He took chances that today would scare the holy crap out of any radio station manager.  Within months of me being hired at KSHE, I walked into Shelley’s office and pitched an idea to him.  As soon as I said, “I have an idea” he dropped his pen and sat back to listen. I described what I called a “Musical Bizarre.”  It would be a concert, but bizarre because of the strange mix of musical styles. I would have a rock band, a blue grass band, a honky tonk piano player (my mom) and a jazzy lounge singer.  Shelley thought about it for a beat or two and said okay.  I said what? He repeated, “Okay.  It’s your idea.  Go do it.”  That was the day my life was set on a path for which I am forever grateful.  That feeling can never be accurately described when your boss says yes.  Do it.  It yours to do.  Then he offered his support and said he would get 7UP to sponsor it so I didn’t have to worry about expenses.  Imagine that.  Then he said, “You should have an out-of-town act for a headliner.  There’s this guy in Chicago who just released his first album, here’s his phone number.  Call him up and see if he wants to come in to promote his album, it’s pretty good.  His name is Billy Joel.”  So the very first concert I produced starred Billy Joel.  And my mom opened for him.


TS: What is KSHE like today?
RS: This is the key to their 50 years.  They were purchased by the perfect company to seal their success and curate it through the years.  Emmis Communications, headed by Jeff Smulyan probably understood what they had when they bought KSHE better than any other company that could have purchased the station.  They got it, respected it and hired guys like John Beck and Rick Balis to nurture it to the rock monster it has become.  It’s still fun to walk into their studios, still fun to listen and still fun to see the people who make it happen day in and day out.  I hope everyone who works there appreciates the amazing thing they have working for a company like Emmis.  Joy and I had the pleasure of working for Emmis in New York.  We got to see close up what a great company they are.  KSHE is still KSHE thanks to them. They only changed as needed to meet the changing needs of the market and the industry.

TS: Where does the title of the doc, NEVER SAY GOODBYE, come from?

RS: As you might imagine, we labored over a title for some time.  It’s like naming a band.  You want it to convey a feeling, a sentiment, or a philosophy.  Most of the titles we tried didn’t quite hit that mark.  They seemed cheap and superficial.  Any references to Sweetmeat seemed too commercial sounding. Ha!  NEVER SAY GOODBYE was put on a list by me.  I would send an occasional list around to the crew to have them check off names they liked.  No one picked NEVER SAY GOODBYE, but I kept it on the list because it just kept staring back at me.  It spoke to me about my feelings about rock n roll.  Rock has aged, we have aged, KSHE has aged, but we’re all still here, we still listen and still enjoy rock.  We never said goodbye.  Then, in the process of looking for music for the film, I came across a song by Eric Lysaght called “Goodbye” and it caught my eye.  It’s a very hauntingly sad sounding song where he simply sings “You never said goodbye.”   At the time we were shooting the scene where we all visited the old KSHE site at 9434 Watson Road.  I couldn’t think of that location anymore without thinking about that song.  It was like the ghost of Watson Road telling me to use this song and that solidified my commitment to the title.  Soon after, Cat Mues, who was helping me with music rights from local musicians, handed me the song “Never Say Goodbye” by Richie Callison.  The first time I heard it, I knew it was meant to be and Richie was more than happy to let us use it.  Later I learned from Richie that the song is about two generations of family that served in Iraq and the fear of losing someone else to war.  The song touches me every time I hear it and I feel it gave even deeper meaning to our title.


TS: Where did you dig up so much of the great archival footage?
RS:  That was an ongoing process over the entire year of production and the items came from dozens of sources.  I personally shot the old Super-8 footage in the KSHE studios of me, Joy, Sir Ed, Bob Burch and Shelley Grafman on the air.  I also shot the front office footage, the KSHE picnic footage and the footage at Capital Radio in London.  All of that came off my Super-8 camera in 1975 and 1976.  The footage around St. Louis in the 70’s, coming over the bridge, the Arch, the old stadium, etc, was footage discovered by John Neiman, author of In Concert: KSHE and 40+ Years of Rock in St. Louis.  He told me he found it at a garage sale in Chicago.  The footage of Janis Joplin in Forest Park was a big surprise to me.  I was talking to Toby Weiss, who supplied some of her rock & roll art work for the project and she told me about it and gave me the name of the person who owned it, Tom Lunt.  I called Tom and he was happy to give me permission to use it.  It wasn’t until after I secured the film that I realized I had the story BEHIND Janis’s visit to Forest Park from Richard Palmese.  So it all came together beautifully.  I also received additional video footage of KSHE taken in 1983 by Radio Rich Dalton.

TS: What was your favorite thing about making this documentary?

RS: First, meeting everyone who helped.  I made a lot of new, creative, generous friends.  And then… the editing.  I loved editing it.  That’s where the story really comes together.  That’s where the art of telling the story comes to life.  I learned more in 6 months of editing this work than anything I’ve ever done with video or film.  My previous 30 years of editing audio taught me a lot about all the tools I have at my disposal to tell a story.  There’s so much more than just the words and the images. You have to consider ALL of the elements every second of the way throughout the process.  The words, the order you place them, the pacing, the sound effects, the music, the images, the order of those images, the duration of each image, each transition, each motion.  Every second of the way, you’re directing the attention of the viewers in helping them follow your storyline.  You have to know when to pause and take a breath and when to speed up the story to get to a point.  I never grew tired of that process. I decided before I began that I wanted to mimic a Woody Allen style of film editing, but in a documentary.  The fast pacing and overlapping of words to make the pieces seem more like natural conversation was intentional.  It’s almost as if we’re actually interrupting each other at some points.  As the excitement in telling a particular story grew, the pace picked up and as pieces became more serious or more emotional, it slowed down.  That was a process I wanted to explore going into it and I was happy with the outcome.


TS: Any plans on making another documentary and if so, what about?
RS: The next one is already in the works.  Joy is rehabbing a very historic home in Soulard.  It was built in 1876 for a Doctor Arzt on top of a man-made cave to create a grotto.  The history of the home, along with the history of Soulard, is a very colorful one.  We bought it three years ago and Joy committed herself to restoring it as much to its original look and glory as humanly possible.  The previous owner bought it back in the early 70’s when Soulard was just beginning its renaissance that is now blossoming all these years later.  But this home remained unfinished, barely holding on for dear life when Joy discovered it.  The project really needed the love and care that an artist like Joy could bring it.  We still don’t live in it, because every… single … inch of the home had to be repaired, restored, or rehabbed in some way.  Everything. Amazingly, however, all the beautiful woodwork was still there, just in terrible shape.  Dr. Arzt built an alley house behind the home for his clinic and he would enter the clinic through a tunnel going from his house, under the back courtyard and into the back structure.  Today the alley house is two apartments, still part of the main complex.  Dr. Arzt also created the very first heat radiation system in the midwest, which is still there, along with an air-conditioning system that you can still see throughout.  Rumors about the suicide in the house and the mysterious tunnel that goes under the street to another building still persist.  During the 20’s through the 50’s the main house was broken up into multiple residences, which we are in the process of documenting with the various families that lived there at the time.  It’s a fun project but very different than the rock n roll documentary that is NEVER SAY GOODBYE.

SLIFF 2017 Interview: Robert T. Herrera – Writer and Director of PALACIOS

PALACIOS screens Saturday, November 11th at 2:00pm at The Tivoli Theater (6350 Delmar Blvd, St. Louis) as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival. Ticket information can be found HERE.

Eugene, an inner-city teen, escapes the city streets and hides away on a Midwest city rooftop during the Fourth of July holiday. He is found by Holly, a widowed alcoholic, who lives in the secluded rooftop dwelling with her Boston terrier. They commit to spending the day together above the city as they wait for a hopeful resolution to Eugene’s situation. As the day passes, a friendship grows even as their personal realities begin to catch up with them.

Robert T. Herrera, writer and director of PALACIOS, took the time to answer questions about his film for We Are Movie Geeks.

Interview conducted by Tom Stockman

Tom Stockman: What was your filmmaking experience before PALACIOS?

Robert Herrera: PALACIOS is technically my third feature film. My first film was a documentary that I never had the opportunity to release. I still think that first doc is my best film to date unfortunately. My second documentary, The Gray Seasons, was my first released film and Palacios is my first narrative film. I went to college for architecture, art, and philosophy. So making a feature doc was basically my film school. Professionally, I freelance produce, direct, and edit spots and brand content for clients, production companies, and networks around the country. While that isn’t “filmmaking” — it greatly influences what I do and how I do it. So, ultimately, I’ve been doing this for about 13 years now.

TS: How did you become interested in films? Did you grow up a movie fan?


RH: I’m a pretty classic case. I’ve wanted to make movies since I was a 5-year-old kid in South Texas. I was raised on a lot of media — probably a pretty unhealthy amount of movies, tv, and comics. But in the end I turned out relatively normal and pretty knowledgeable about ‘story’ I think. But most of my life has been focused around art and movies.

TS: Who are some of your favorite filmmakers?

RH: It mostly just depends on my mood. Of course I like a bunch of classic old dudes from Hitchcock to Malick to Altman. I really didn’t discover foreign films until college — and there are too many names to list there. As far as modern American filmmakers – of course, I love all-things Paul Thomas Anderson. Over the course of my recent career I’ve really been taken with Kelly Reichardt, Derek Cianfrance, and many others. And internationally I’m usually pretty excited about the next Wong Kar-wai, Andrea Arnold, Jonathan Glazer, and Dardenne brothers projects. I indulge in plenty of Hollywood fare also. And I’m a sucker for basically any dog movie — from 2014’s Hungarian film, White God, to 8 Below with Paul Walker. How can you not like dog movies?

TS: How did the script for PALACIOS come about and how long did it take you to write it?

RH: I usually refer to Palacios as a film not really written, but designed. Its creation revolved around what resources were available to me and what sort of “moments” I was living in at the time. It was designed around a few simple concepts, people, and locations. I collected those elements in my little brain and tried to develop something that 1. I understood enough to write 2. made efficient use of everything available to us and 3. felt “real” — for whatever that is worth. Once I knew WHO would be in there film, WHERE it would be shot, and HOW it would be shot — I wrote 2/3rds of a shooting script in a week. The entire 2nd act of the film was written during shooting or made up on the spot.

TS: Were these characters in PALACIOS based on people you knew?

RH: Yes and No. I really didn’t ask either actor to play someone that much different from themselves. Their backstories were developed between myself and actors. A lot of their interactions were based on interactions or relationships I’ve experienced.

TS: Tell me about casting Libby Bibb in the role of Holly. Were there other actresses you considered?

RH: I’ve known Libby Bibb since about 2004 I think. I was a finalist in a script contest and she was assigned to read the lead female character during the readings the contest organized. I loved her read. She was so natural and full of nerves and nuance. And she made it look so easy. We became friends and I pondered different film ideas for her over the years. Once it finally came time to make something in 2013 – I knew it would be for her. No other actress was considered. I don’t know if she would agree 100%, but I feel like her and I have a very similar mindset on what we want to see on camera during a performance. I think we have the same goals in that regard. Whether she thinks we achieve them – I can’t say. But I feel like we do.

TS: Your leading man, Olajuwon Davis, is currently serving a long prison term for a serious crime. Did his legal troubles start after your film had wrapped? What were your thoughts when you heard about the trouble he was in?

RH: This is a loaded conversation. I’ll just try and give simple answers along with my general feeling of the situation. We shot this film in the summer of 2013. My life and workload slowed down the edit process. His arrest came in November 2014, days before the non-indictment of Darren Wilson. That in itself is a long story, but it was a major shock to all that know him. The story surrounding his arrest and crime aren’t a full picture – and in my opinion – a distorted picture. And people that know Olajuwon, including most of us that made the film, feel that. His situation is one of the main reasons I waited this long to edit this project — and I almost didn’t finish it. But after long talks with Olajuwon, my crew, my wife, and just people that are important to my life and work — we decided to finish it. Olajuwon and his family are very supportive of the film. My crew and my family are still very supportive of Olajuwon and very much believe in him and who he is despite what is said and written. He is doing well. We talk regularly. He is very excited about the film. He just won Breakthrough Performance at the Jim Thorpe Independent Film Festival at our premiere in June along with us winning Best Feature. He is proud of the film and in his words – he intends to get out soon, get his life back on a positive track, and plans to stay involved in creative ventures, acting, and being a positive force in the world and in the lives around him. When you see his character in PALACIOS  — that’s basically Olajuwon Davis. I think people would have a hard time reconciling who they see on screen versus what they read about him — and I think that is something to think about when you read about all the young minorities out in this country who are considered irredeemable criminals.

TS: Tell me about the Boston Terrier.

RH: Of course! That’s my dog, Ingebar! He is a very expressive little guy – and not trained to do much of anything. Ingebar does what Ingebar does. Fortunately, he’s super predictable if you offer him tons of chicken tenders. So, he was really easy to work with on location — especially since that location was our home. In many cases, he shocked us with how well he took to just living his normal life on camera. He is full of so much attitude — and like I said earlier, I love dogs in films. This story needed him for balance and pacing — and in many ways he serves as a nonjudgmental figurehead — or completely judgmental — depending on how you view the movie. I wanted to put my shar-pei, George, in the movie too. But that crazy dude was as unpredictable as they come.

TS: Your previous feature was a doc about women’s basketball. What are some of the key differences between doc and narrative filmmaking? What would you like your next film to be?

RH: Obviously, from a logistical standpoint, everything is different. But in terms of story – I don’t see much of a difference. I mostly have the same goals with anything I make at this point in my career. I know this much – when making a documentary, I feel all the anxiety while in production. It’s not in my nature to be all up in peoples’ business the way you need to be for a good doc. But I feel completely at ease once I edit the film and screen it. In that case, I feel like I have done all that I could do to make that the best film possible. With narrative film – it’s the opposite. I feel no anxiety about the writing, development, shooting, and making the film. But when it comes time to screen it, I’m very anxious about it. I just shot a narrative short. And have plans to shoot another narrative feature in Summer 2018. I’d happily make another doc if one reveals itself – and there are many doc ideas currently in play, but narrative will be a priority for a while.

TS: What do you think of the local film scene? What do you think St. Louis has to offer for filmmakers?

RH: I have mixed feelings about the local film scene in St. Louis. I travel and direct commercial and client work in many different cities and markets across the country — so I get a pretty good feel for what is going on in those regions and cities, and many times it makes me frustrated about trying to make a film in St. Louis. Of course there is a flipside that makes me say, “this could only be done in St. Louis or a place like it.” So I see both sides of the coin. With that said, I have no burning desire to be anywhere else. I have been in St. Louis since 2002 and all my films have been made here. PALACIOS is very much a product of a Mexican-American Texan who lives in St. Louis City. And that’s a good thing. If all goes according to plan, my next feature will be shot in South Texas – but I will be bringing a lot of St. Louis with me to get it made.

TS: What St. Louis locations did you use for PALACIOS?

RH: The film was shot in my “unique living space” on Delmar at the north end of the Central West End. This rooftop, and how I came to be there for 8 years, is a long story that I won’t get into. But I always knew I wanted to shoot something there. I don’t know what percentage of the film takes place there — maybe 90%? But it was basically all on that roof, around the building and around the block — aside from picking up a few shots at the Grand Metro Station.

TS: What are your release plans for PALACIOS?

RH: PALACIOSw as made with zero expectations. It was made out of pure desire to experiment and to work in a way that made sense to us. That’s not to downplay its importance to us. It’s a film that we care about greatly. But we made it, we loved the process that we developed while making it, and we think we achieved what we set out to achieve. So, the release will be pretty standard. I’ll be curious to see response to PALACIOS throughout its festival life. So far, that response as been pretty great. My last film, The Gray Seasons, was able to fight its way thru festivals and ultimately land exciting distribution. Maybe that same route is in the cards for PALACIOS. I think we’re pretty okay at making watchable films. I’m not much for developing exciting distribution plans after its made. But the experience and connections made with my last film and through my commercial work should add to our ability to get this small film out there.

TS: How has PALACIOS been received so far?

RH: Response has been pretty overwhelming by those that have watched it so far. I’ve had some pretty intense discussions with audience members about not only the story and content, but just how we made this film in general. Our most recent screening in Jim Thorpe, Pennsylvania was pretty amazing. The crowd there was pretty taken aback. And we were given Best Feature, Best Actress, and Breakthrough Performance. It’s nice when people find value in what you do — however they qualify that value.

SLIFF 2017 Review – POP AYE


POP AYE screens Thursday, Nov. 9 at 9:00pm and Friday, Nov. 10 at 7:05pm as part of this year’s St. Louis International Film Festival Both screenings are at The Plaza Frontenac Cinema (210 Plaza Frontenac St. Louis , MO 63131). Ticket information for the Nov. 9 screening can be found HERE. Ticket information for the Nov. 10 screening can be found HERE

In “Pop Aye,” a successful Bangkok architect in the midst of a midlife crisis is reunited with an elephant he knew growing up. The two embark on a road trip to the man’s childhood home in the idyllic Thai countryside. Along the way, they meet a colorful cast of characters that includes a pair of nonplussed local police officers, a forlorn transgender sex worker, and a mysteriously wise drifter. As the encounters mount and the bond between man and elephant deepens, filmmaker Kirsten Tan weaves a strikingly universal tale in a feature debut that won prizes (and hearts) at the Sundance and Rotterdam film festivals. “Filmmaker Kirsten Tan riffs on the tropes of both the buddy film and the road trip movie in her absurd yet subtly observed feature debut,” writes the Washington Post, which hails “Pop Aye” as “the thinking person’s feel-good film of the summer: Much is communicated nonverbally (or, at most, with sparse dialogue). The palpable bromance — if that’s even the right word for this interspecies relationship — is visible in each trunk nuzzle.”


Review of POP AYE by Cary Paller:

Sometimes the best films just let the story unfold from beginning to end.  There is no hidden agenda or a false narrative to surprise the audience with a big revelation at the end.  POP AYE is a film that relies on an introspective story.  For a very subtle film it felt like there was a lot more going on than there really was.  Writer/Director Kristen Tan did a wonderful job of keeping the film centered, grounded and low key without losing its undercurrent of what could happen next.  With practical locations giving the film a realistic, low budget look, I am sure they had no real budget to speak of, you cannot help but get sucked into the story.  It is in nature that everybody can find their way.  Thaneth Warakulnukroh plays Thana a man drifting in life without purpose.  Living a life that lacks fulfillment.  Till he comes across an Elephant from better times in his life.  His portrayal of a man at a crossroads is very thought provoking.  Seeing the elephant named POP AYE gives him some hope and drive that his listless existence was missing.  Of course not a lot is said but you can see it in his eyes. He is full of reflection which gives the  film something that a film like “Operation; Dumbo Drop” does not have.  Which is a sense real adventure without feeling it has to come to silly jokes or child’s play but in the end you forget the movie almost instantly.Being able to tell a good story without relying on action or special effects is becoming a challenge now a days.  Kristen Tan deserves whatever praise she can get for making a film that feels like an old fashion road movie without the slapstick and chase scenes.  I really enjoyed watching it. It was such a beautiful movie if I may say. It was patient and it did not waver from the path it was meant to be on.  I look forward to future projects from her.