A MAN CALLED OTTO – Review

Tom Hanks is Otto Anderson in Columbia Pictures A MAN CALLED OTTO. Photo by: Niko Tavernise

So, we’re almost a week into 2023 and all that holiday cheer is so…last year. What a perfect time for a film centering around an older fella’ who’s…well, a human version of the grinch, sans green fur and the larceny. And who’s taken on this role? It’s none other than the movie’s “Mr. Nice Guy’ himself, “America’s dad” (perhaps grandpa; now), and two-time Oscar winner Tom Hanks. Hey. we all need to “shake things up” a bit, and get out of our “comfort zone”. But are his filmgoing fans ready to accept him as a real grouch AKA A MAN CALLED OTTO? BTW, this has no connection to A FISH CALLED WANDA or THE MAN CALLED FLINTSTONE, in case you’re wondering.

When we first encounter Otto Anderson (Hanks), he’s raising a stink at his local hardware store because he doesn’t see why he has to pay for another foot of rope, when he only needs another six inches. From there he’s off to his gated community, a “pre-planned” set of “cloned” small two-story houses, just outside of Pittsburgh. Every morning, before he trudges off to his long-standing factory job, he makes the “rounds” Otto considers himself the “enforcer” of the homeowners’ society’s rules, quick with his notepad jotting down any infractions (not separating the recyclables, trimming the lawns, etc.). During this, he growls at some of his neighbors, including a talky “speed-walker”, a delivery driver parking too long in a guest, spot, and a young woman who doesn’t “curb” her pooch. Perhaps worst is the jerk from the real estate agency (Mike Birbiglia) who drives through “no vehicle” walkways. As far as work goes, he’s out of it, forced into early retirement by his company’s new, much-younger owners. On his way back home, he stops off at the grave of his beloved wife Sonya for a chat before embarking on his home “project”. Remember that rope, well it will be part of his plan to join Sonya. But as he puts the noose around his neck (while dressed in his best suit), a commotion outside distracts him. A family has rented out the house next door, and the husband can’t back up with the trailer attached to the old SUV. Being an auto buff, Otto has to intervene. He meets Pittsburgh native Tommy (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo), his pregnant Hispanic wife Marisol (Mariana Trevino), and their two pre-teen daughters. Needless to say, Otto is most unpleasant to them, but his gruffness doesn’t stop Marisol from reaching out to him. Can this young optimistic family break through his emotional barriers and get Otto to “lighten up” and perhaps put aside his “project’ and find a reason to go on living?

Well, can we buy our “bosom buddy” Mr. H as an unsociable curmudgeon? Hmmm, somewhat, especially in the first act as he focuses his disdainful glare at anyone coming into his sight range. But it’s more intense irritation than blind fury. We know his bark (more of a cry for help) is much worse than his bite as we wait for this stomping iceberg to gradually melt. And though we’d never want to deal with him in reality, Hanks makes Otto a compelling, often unpredictable toxic troll. By the story’s midpoint, we see that he’s met his match in Trevino as Marisol whose wide smile burns through the near-constant clouds of an Eastern winter (the scenes really seem chilly). She brings a lot of energy to the forever frazzled mama, though we wonder why she doesn’t give up on the “old mope”. Garcia-Rulfo is a likable doofus daddy who gladly lets her “run the show”. Rachel Keller is quite endearing in the flashback sequences as Otto’s soulmate Sonya. It’s a shame that we only get a couple of brief scenes with the gifted stand-up comic Birbiglia as Otto’s up-tight, buttom-down weasel of an arch-nemisis. Luckily Mr, B makes his every sneer count.

Now, as many of you know this is a remake of a Swedish film (A MAN CALLED OVE) based on a beloved novel of the same name, Back in 2016 it was the year’s biggest foreign-language box-office champ, so it’s got big snow boots to fill. Hanks is more than up for it, though he lacks the lumbering menace of that film’s lead star, Rolf Lassgard, who has an aura of real danger, as though he’s a bear just awake from hibernation (and you’re a tasty salmon). To “hedge their bets” the screenplay adapter, David Magee, has retained most of the story “beats” while shuffling some flashback sequences around a tad. Still, Sonya seems more saintly here as we meet a few of her former students who remind Otto of her unconditional kindness. And it’s a shame that director Mark Forster (talk about a wide resume, from MONSTER’S BALL to Bond) didn’t cut back on the antics of Otto’s cartoonish neighbors who seem lifted out of an ABC TGIF sitcom (plus the amped-up antics of the “newbies”). Still, it’s nice to see Hanks in a big lead role after doing supporting work in the past year. And it’s got a bit more bite than most “family-friendly” dramedies, despite the sentimental “memory pieces”. Even though he can be annoying and dismissive there are worse people to live next to than A MAN CALLED OTTO.

2.5 Out of 4

A MAN CALLED OTTO is now playing in select theatres

HELLRAISER (2022) – Review

Jamie Clayton as Pinhead in Spyglass Media Group’s HELLRAISER, exclusively on Hulu. Photo courtesy of Spyglass Media Group. © 2022 Spyglass Media Group. All Rights Reserved.

So, we’re now officially a week into October. Ready for a spooky flick? Well most hardcore “horror hounds’ are game any time of the year, but this month is…special. And what better way to get “in the mood” than revisiting some iconic and shocking characters in a big reboot, though their creator calls this a “re-imagining” (um, okay). Oh, and we’re not reaching back to the Universal icons of the 30s, 40s, and 50s. They skip a few decades to get into the scream kings (and queens) of the 70s and 80s. It just feels like all of them have gotten a nice new coat of gore. Hey, even Michael Meyers will be back in a week for his final rampage (heard that before). And much like Chucky, these horrors spring from a toy, a puzzle box specifically. As we learned 35 years ago, and over ten flicks, when you solve this puzzle you don’t get a prize because it’s a real HELLRAISER.

This “new take” begins on the streets of Serbia as a woman named Menacker (Haim Abbas) does an exchange in a dingy alley, handing over a briefcase full of cash for a nondescript box, which its former owner warns her not to open. Cut to the impressive mansion of a pleasure-seeking reclusive billionaire named Voight. There’s a party in progress, clothes optional. Menacker meets a handsome young man at the bar and invites him to a private audience with Voight, in his secret gallery. Inside a case, he spots a detailed puzzle box, the Lament Configuration. Voight appears (Goran Visnej) and instructs his guest to solve the puzzle. When he does a spring-triggered needle pops out and punctures his hand. The box seems to suck up his blood which initiates a portal to another dimension that shoots out long chains with sharp hooks that dig into his flesh before hoisting him up. From there the story shifts to a grungy bedroom as Riley (Odessa A’zion) and her new beau Trevor (Drew Starkey) enjoy each other’s company. As they leave the sprawling apartment they’re confronted by her straight-laced brother Matt (Brandon Flynn) He’s angry that she’s dating somebody she met while in rehab and thinks she’s using again. Oh, and she’s behind in her share of the rent. Back at Trevor’s place, he suggests a way to make some quick cash. He makes delivers to a warehouse owner by some “rich dude”. They could use the security code and take something in his safe. And they go through with it, acquiring, yup that deadly puzzle box. Later, when it whisks away Matt, Riley is on a mission to find out the secrets of the box and rescue her sibling. But will she along with Trevor and their friends become victims to the box and the other-worldly demons known as Cenobites?

In an interesting spin on your typical horror heroine. or scream queen, A’zion as Riley is a woman who seemingly has her hands, and mind, full battling her own inner demons, let alone some true terrors from another dimension. And she’s up to the challenge even as the script has her screeching in her opening act like a spoiled petulant pre-teen. But her missing bro forces her into detective mode and A’zion is a formidable force as she slowly uncovers the truth about the “box”. Starkey has a low-key seedy charm as the tempting “bad boy” of many fantasies. But he’s a piker compared to Voight who is given a sinister grinning snarl by Visnej, whose leading man looks mask his perverse machinations. And making a mark (in more ways than one) is Jamie Clayton as The Priest (often referred to as “pinhead” which irks its creator), her passive aggressive delivery, much like one of those home AI devices, clashes with the sadistic punishments it unleashes.

So, has director David Bruckner (THE NIGHT HOUSE) delivered a terror trek that surpassed the 1987 original? Well, there are a few new interesting spins (the attire of the Cenobites particularly), but there is little of the campy fun of that trippy late 80s flick that surprised us. And the new script from Ben Collins, Luke Piotrowski, and David S. Goyer (yup, it took a trio) doesn’t deliver new shocks, but rather tepid variations on familiar scary set pieces inspired by the Clive Barker classic. It’s amusing that Voight’s mansion itself is also a puzzle box, but its contrivances just feel…contrived, though the art direction is done well. This is something like the tenth film in this series, but it just might be time to put that nasty puzzle box in storage until someone can twist and turn it until it becomes a truly horrific HELLRAISER.


1.5 Out of 4

HELLRAISER is now streaming exclusively on Hulu

Discuss: Are they remaking 80’s Classics too soon?

I’m sort of recycling this a bit, borrowing the idea and news from Cinematical, but it got me to thinking. So, first I’ll pass on the general thinking here… the bit about FERRIS BUELLER’S DAY OFF being remade isn’t a fact, or even a rumor, but rather a concept brought up during an interview by Cinematical with Matthew Broderick, who said “It would be fine” when asked how he would feel about someone remaking the 1980’s classic.

As for MANNEQUIN, this I am disturbed to say, is apparently actually happening. Courtesy of Cinematical, Gladden Entertainment wants to remake the 1987 film, which originally starred Andrew McCarthy as a sex-obsessed department store employee who fantasizes about a window mannequin coming to life. Played by Kim Cattrall (SEX IN THE CITY), the mannequin turns out to be a reincarnated Egyptian princess. Gladden Entertainment is hoping to give the story a more contemporary appeal with a hip, young cast… a la The Twilight Saga, maybe?

With the FAME remake behind us, the FOOTLOOSE remake coming out this year and the RED DAWN remake rapidly approaching, it seems we’ve entered a new era of recycled 80’s stories. It’s all coming full-circle, but is it too much too soon? Personally, I think so. You’ve got to give a movie to run it’s full course. It used to be, we wouldn’t see films remade for at least a good 20-30 years, and even then it was far less common than it is today. I’m only 31 years old and still vividly remember movies like FERRIS BUELLER’S DAY OFF like I just saw them yesterday. So, it’s strange to find these films being remade already. Now, I don’t have children, but many from my generation do… but, how many of these kids are even old enough to watch these remakes AND be able to appreciate the originals?

It’s my opinion that a film should at least skip a generation before being remade, in order to be respectfully accepted. In these examples, it’s not been enough time. Anyone who has seen the originals is likely not interested in seeing the remakes and those old enough to see the remakes are likely clueless about the originals. Therefor, there’s a disconnect between the source material and the new material. Give parents of my generation a chance to pass our classics from our childhood down properly, then consider remaking them for future audiences, when the new generations is old enough to approach the material respectfully and with some knowledge.

So, you’ve heard my two cents on the subject. What are your thoughts? Is it too much too soon? Are we robbing a generation from being able to appreciate our classics by spoon-feeding them the watered-down remakes before they’re even exposed to the original material? Chime in and make yourselves heard. We want to know how our readers feel about this.

‘Videodrome’ Next Up on the Remake Pile

videodrome

“Long live the new fless…” Â  Only, it’s not exactly new anymore, is it? Â  Universal is looking to make it new, anyway, because they have decided they are going to remake Cronenberg’s ’83 cult classic.

Cronenberg’s original starred James Woods as the head of a television network who decides to start running “Videodrome,” a bootleg piece of video that depicts murder and mutilation. Â  In his efforts to track down a copy of the show, the head finds his life unravelling and, ultimately, uncovers what the television show is all about.

Universal is looking to modernize the original, injecting into it the idea of nano-technology and make it a larger-scale sci-fi film. Â  Ehren Kruger (‘Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen’) has been set to work on the screenplay.

What do you think? Â  Is this another studio attempt at cashing in on something they don’t understand but is rather popular? Â  Would the idea of bringing ‘Videodrome’ up to date be a good one? Â  Who would be Universal’s best choice as director if they are to even come close to realizing Cronenberg’s original vision? Â  Let us know by commenting below!

Source: Variety