Reality Reels: ‘Searching for the Wrong-Eyed Jesus’

searchingwrongjesusmovie

‘Searching for the Wrong-Eyed Jesus’ is an intimate work of haunting beauty, revealing a wealth of creative spirit and culture in the deep South that’s both foreign and fascinating. The film combines folk and alternative country music performed by established artists on and off screen, as well as interviews with it’s bleak cinematography to paint a picture of the opposite of Norman Rockwell’s America.

The film was directed by Andrew Douglas, who would go on to direct the 2005 remake of ‘The Amityville Horror’. The movie follows alternative country singer Jim White on a casual tour of the deep South and attempts to shed light on the role music and religion play in the lives of the people.

The idea for the film came from the title of one of Jim White’s albums called Searching for the Wrong-Eyed Jesus. The Pentecostal faith is the religion of choice for most of the real life characters in this film, but it’s a general connection to God, a passion for creating music and living a simpler, albeit often difficult, way of life that permeates the film.

Johnny Dowd: “What’ya been doing’?
Jim White: “Killin’ time.” (pause) “It won’t die.”
[They both laugh.]

This is the most straight forward quote from the film that sums up the underlying theme. The characters in the film, ranging from the unemployed to blue-collar workers, inmates to miners, all live a relatively hard life, but despite their hardships they don’t complain. They just sort of laugh the hard parts off and maintain a surprisingly positive outlook on life, each of them fueled by their own individual connection to their faith and/or their drive to make music.

‘Searching for the Wrong-Eyed Jesus’ may sound like a preachy work of right-wing conservatives, but really the film is nothing like that at all. What the viewer gets to experience is how the idea, the concept of religion can do wonders for the human spirit and there’s a constant parallel between this and music. The important message isn’t one of whether there actually is a God, or which religion is right or wrong, but it’s the empty space in a person’s life that this faith, and music, can fill that is important. The film is almost completely void of the politics of religion, which is a fresh breath of air.

Given that the idea for the film was spurred by music, it’s only natural that music plays an integral role in the film. For as long as anyone can remember, and well beyond that, music has played a crucial and irreplaceable role in the lives of people across the globe. Few movies have illustrated this point as clearly as ‘Searching for the Wrong-Eyed Jesus’. Not all of the interviews touch on religion or faith, but music is certainly a key element with many of the figures in this film.

The music of the movie is rich, textural and full of both joy and pain. A few of the songs are incorporated into the film directly, breaking the fourth wall, but used in such a creative fashion that the film becomes more than just a documentary. On screen performances that are staged within the frame include songs from Johnny Dowd and The Handsome Family. It’s a stylistic approach that is both visually and audibly engaging and takes the viewer out of the typical documentary mindset and allows for a more sensory driven experience.

The photography is ‘Searching for the Wrong-Eyed Jesus’ is stunningly beautiful in it’s own way, pulling the charm of the landscape and the textures of the towns into focus. The result is series of cultural landscapes that become characters of their own. While the structure of the film isn’t strictly that of a traditional documentary, those who appreciate the films of Errol Morris may appreciate what this film has to offer. Connoisseurs of eclectic, non-mainstream music should find this a treat as well.

Here’s a clip from ‘Searching for the Wrong-Eyed Jesus’ featuring writer Harry Crews, who is best known for writing the novel ‘The Hawk is Dying’ which was adapted into a film in 2006 starring Paul Giamatti…

If you enjoyed this column, leave us some feedback in the comments section below.

Reality Reels: Have you met Jonathan ‘The Impaler’ Sharkey?

theimpaler

I am all about supporting one’s freedom of religion and freedom of speech, but this is one of the most disturbing movies I’ve seen in a long time. ‘The Impaler’ deals directly with the topic of our freedoms in America and how they apply to everyone, for better or for worse. Thus, we get to meet Jonathan “The Impaler” Sharkey and are taken on a tour of his life as a self-proclaimed Satanic Dark Priest, Hecate Witch and Sanguinary Vampire.

‘Impaler’ was directed by W. Tray White. I hadn’t heard of this documentary, released back in 2007, until I was playing around on Hulu recently and stumbled upon what I initially thought was a mockumentary. That is, until I actually started watching the movie and realized it was for real. I immediately found myself fixated on watching the bizarre story unfold, as is often the case with my taste in peculiar and strange documentary subjects.

‘The Impaler’ jumps right in at the beginning and reveals for us Sharkey’s experience running for governor of Minnesota, having successfully achieved getting his name officially on the ballot. Good for him, but it’s not difficult to believe from a state that elected Jesse “The Body” Ventura into the governor’s office and has voted Al Franken into the Senate.

No one in the film wants to take Sharkey seriously, except for himself and the less frightening and oddly tragic character of Julie Sharkey Carpenter, Jonathan’s wife. Julie comes across as a relatively sweet and innocent woman with “alternative” beliefs and ideas who is the unfortunate victim of being with the wrong guy at the wrong time. This is illustrated best when she loses her long-time job as a school bus driver. She was very good at her job and beloved by the kids and parents and teachers alike, until Jonathan revealed in a campaign press conference that she was a Pagan and subsequently was fired. Right or wrong, she was a casualty of Jonathan’s war.

While the first half of ‘Impaler’ focuses on Sharkey’s shot at a professional career in public office, the second half of the movie touches on his checkered past and his time as a professional wrestler. While both of these portions are detailed with fascinating interviews with characters from Sharkey’s past and present, it’s the moments of intimate conversation with Jonathan himself that create the tense and troublesome mood of this movie more than anything else.

Listening to Jonathan Sharkey tell about his beliefs, his lifestyle and attempt to intelligently explain his political ideology is an exercise in tolerance. Even the most open-minded viewer of this film is likely to find themselves questioning whether an individual like Jonathan Sharkey should be allowed to even run for public office. As we learn more about Jonathan and dig deeper into his life, we see him for the person he is and do eventually come to accept him, if not begrudgingly, as a fellow American acting on his rights as an American.

Overall, the movie is not perfect and could have used some additional time in the editing room, but is anything but boring. For some, ‘Impaler’ will have eyes wide with shocking disbelief and some won’t even bother to finish watching, while for others it will likely be a testament for their own life experiences. I enjoyed peering inside Jonathan Sharkey’s mind and his life (from a distance) but the added straight-on to the camera final moral message from Jonathan himself was a pure failure in documentarian filmmaking and ultimately dropped my rating by half a point.

[Overall: Formerly 3.25 stars out of 5, but dropped to 2.75 by the end credits]