Girls, Guns and G-Strings: ANDY SIDARIS – A Legend Of Cult Cinema

sidarisheader

Article by Mark Longden

If you’re going to watch the movies of Andy Sidaris, you’ll require a mental divide of some sort, especially if you’re the sort of person who believes we should all be treated and viewed equally. While we all, as humans, like looking at pretty pictures of people of whatever gender floats our boat, at some point – usually about half an hour in – of one of his movies, even the most dedicated admirer of boobs will be thinking “any time you want to get back to the plot is fine by me”.

Below is the scene that first interested me in the work of Mr Sidaris. If you like it, read on, if you groan, then We Are Movie Geeks has many articles about decent movies to enjoy. Here it is:

Andy Sidaris got his start directing sport on TV. He was the original director of ABC’s “Wide World Of Sports”, which he did for over 20 years, and he also filmed several different Olympic games (including the infamous Munich Olympics of 1972). Although it’s difficult to read through the stream of profanity and insults of other filmmakers and actors, his interviews seem to indicate he was always interested in making movies. His first was a documentary about actor James Garner’s attempts to form a motor-racing team, but it was beyond my abilities to track down, and it doesn’t represent the person he was, I think.

malibu_express-andy_sidaris
Andy Sidaris

The bulk of his output was between 1985 and 1998; ten movies directed by him and two by his son Christian, featuring a regular cast of Playboy playmates and his friends. But he made two movies before that, “Stacey” in 1973 and “Seven” in 1979, which, although they’re not included, fit with the 12 on the “Girls, Guns And G-Strings” DVD box set.

stacey
Anne Randall in STACEY

“Stacey” stars Anne Randall, the first of his many Playboy playmates, but she’d been appearing for some time in normal mainstream-ish movies so separated herself from the pack by actually being a decent actor. She’s Stacy Hanson, a race-car driver / private eye, and she’s hired by a rich old lady to see if the freeloading relatives living at her house are worth putting in her will. There’s a sleazy cult leader, all sorts of adventures and of course Stacey takes plenty of showers and has a healthy amount of sex with her boyfriend / sidekick.

malibuexpress
MALIBU EXPRESS

Sidaris remade it as “Malibu Express”, the first of the GGG movies, in 1985, with the gender of the main character switched and a few subplots added, but otherwise largely the same. Quite why he wanted to tell this fairly slight story twice, I have no idea (more on that later); the new star is a character with the surname Abilene, and the Abilene boys were a regular feature in his movies up to the break he took in 1993. Again, no idea why, it felt a little like a joke he eventually forgot why he was telling; from starring in this to being maybe 10th billed in “Fit To Kill”, the Abilenes were a strange clan.

Seven-1979-3
William Smith in SEVEN

This misses out “Seven”, from 1979. Even for a filmmaker as loose as Sidaris, this is a loose one; with a solid two-thirds of its running time feeling like a gang of buddies setting up a night out, not seven mercenaries plotting to kill seven mega-criminals. “Seven” features a character, “The Professor”, who’d go on to appear in a few of his future movies, making this the first official entry in the Sidaris-verse – yes, the fact I’ve spent time thinking about it makes me quite sad. Oh, and remember that scene from above? He did it in this movie first, then decided to make it 10000% more ludicrous in “Hard Ticket To Hawaii”; and just so you don’t think the direction of plagiarism is one way, “Seven” features the whole “guy with gun shoots guy with sword” scene that “Raiders Of The Lost Ark” used a couple of years later.

HARD_TICKET_ee_image_3_758_426_81_s_c1
HARD TICKET TO HAWAII

From 1987’s “Hard Ticket To Hawaii” to 1993’s “Fit To Kill”, we were treated to a run of surprisingly entertaining movies. They all followed roughly the same template – a large group of hot women and a few hot men have to stop some criminals, usually in Hawaii but occasionally elsewhere, just always a location where the women can wear bikinis. They developed a recurring antagonist towards the end, a chap called Cane, but he switched ethnicity (from Pat Morita to RJ “son of Roger” Moore) and was almost part of the gang by the end. None of them are very good, if we’re being honest, but there’s a real sense of fun in most of them – except 1991’s “Do Or Die”, where the crushing weight of sexism ruins any enjoyment. Then, I’d guess that Sidaris wanted some time off, and his son took over the family business for a couple of years, writing and directing two movies so miserable, poorly made, edited, written and acted that I (along with everyone who watched them at the time) was begging for Andy’s return. Christian did introduce Julie K Smith to the Sidaris-verse, though, so he ought to be commended for that.

sid7
Julie Strain in Sidaris’ DAY OF THE WARRIOR

So Andy got back in the director’s chair, gave us a couple more movies with the next generation of crime-fighting bikini-wearers, then (according to an interview from the time) had funding for a movie called “Battlezone Hawaii” but never made it, and never made another movie again, dying in 2007.

Let’s talk Playmates. In all his movies from “Hard Ticket To Hawaii” to “Fit To Kill” is Dona Speir, who was actually an okay actress by the end of things. She played Donna (the first of many, many people who acted as characters named after themselves in these movies), and her sidekick for three movies was Taryn, played by Hope Marie Carlton. Now, here’s a story that’ll either have you going “so what?” or being vaguely disgusted with Sidaris – Carlton apparently kept having plastic surgery on her breasts, and after three movies told him she didn’t want to show them on camera any more. So what did Andy do? Did he support his friend or did he fire her immediately?

guns

Dona Speir and Roberta Vasquez in GUNS

So, replacing her was Roberta Vasquez as “Nicole”, who was perfectly happy to disrobe almost constantly. With slightly smaller roles in the series were Cynthia Brimhall as singer Edy, Ava Cadell as Ava, and the wonderfully named Pandora Peaks. The men were so bland that even though I’ve seen 14 Sidaris movies in the last few months, I wouldn’t be able to pick any of them out of a lineup, and neither would you. Or Sidaris, I suspect – with the exception of Rodrigo Obregon, who was his most regular collaborator, almost always playing the bad guy.

DAY OF THE WARRIOR, Julie K. Smith, 1996, (c) Sidaris Entertainment
Julie K. Smith in DAY OF THE WARRIOR

For the last handful of movies, we got Julie K Smith, who I think is a completely decent actress but must have the world’s worst agent because 80% of her career is in movies directed by either Sidaris or Jim Wynorski; and Julie Strain. Strain is beloved in B-movie circles but she seems a little…manufactured? Like she was designed by a committee rather than a real person. I don’t know? She’s also a terrible actress, or at least she was in this series. In case you were feeling forgiving, by the year 2002, when she was all of 40 years old (and looked 30) he was already planning to phase her out in favour of younger models. One of those younger models was Shae Marks, hired solely for the size of her breasts (I feel like I could’ve typed that sentence ten times during the course of this review).

sidaris2

So we’ve discussed his template, and the actors he used. The chief thing you’ll notice if you do something silly like, I don’t know, watch all of them in two weeks, is how often he re-uses ideas, either concepts or scenes he just repeats. I think this warrants the use of bullet points (these are all things that have appeared in at least two of his movies, and often five or more).

  • Remote controlled devices with bombs strapped to them
  • Two + hot tub scenes
  • At least four people dying via explosion
  • A shack with “fuel dump” crudely stamped on it, getting blown up
  • A potential assassination target being identified by the lei they were wearing
  • Helicopters
  • Remote controlled helicopters passed off as real helicopters
  • Cynthia Brimhall singing a terrible song to universal acclaim
  • Comic relief assassin duo, who get blown up but don’t die
  • Abilene family members being unable to shoot (okay, this is played for laughs)
  • Local business product placement
  • Transmitting “secret” messages via a radio DJ, when a phone call would work much better
  • An ending where the entire cast is stood around drinking champagne

sidaris

What I find interesting, from all the interviews with Sidaris I’ve read, is how he describes himself as a good storyteller. He appears unaware that he’s using the same handful of scenes in a different order, over and over again. Or perhaps he was just having a laugh, and didn’t care as long as he got to go to Hawaii once a year with a bunch of nude models to make a movie. Who knows?

3xsidaris

There are two ways to get to see his particular ouevre – there’s the aforementioned “Girls, Guns and G-Strings” DVD set, which is bare-bones but very cheap; and there’s the “Andy Sidaris Collection”, which has commentaries and a fake movie-school special feature featuring Andy and several of his leading ladies.

andy-sidaris-05

Why am I telling you about the entire filmography of a director I’ve said wasn’t very good, and had some rather neanderthal attitudes towards women? Perhaps to show that even someone like myself – an avowed feminist – can find plenty to entertain them in his world. They’re fun, loose, often easy on the eye and not too challenging. The world needs filmmakers like Andy Sidaris, and I hope you enjoy his work as much as I have.

 

 

ACT OF VALOR – The Review


There are times I feel the need to walk on eggshells when discussing a film. ACT OF VALOR is one of those instances where I have two conflicting but equally valid opinions on the film’s perceived purpose and success thereof. For a film that has been relatively well marketed for what seems like a fairly good stretch of time, I imagine most who have seen the trailers and TV spots are well aware that the film is an action story based upon real tactics and missions, most likely a hybrid of several pieced together, as not to reveal any specifically sensitive information. Considering this, how does the film grade?

ACT OF VALOR is co-directed by Mike McCoy and Scott Waugh. The film is cast with real, active-duty Navy SEALs, which on its own merit, is a really cool concept, a concept that equally fails and succeeds, depending on which aspect of the film we are discussing. What do I mean? Let me put it this way… Anytime you cast a film with untrained, non-professional actors — or amateurs, in short – you run the risk of poor performance destroying a film, despite the quality of its many parts in whole. That is not the case with ACT OF VALOR, well… not entirely. The greater portion of the blame during certain scenes goes to a low level of dramatic writing and bad dialogue, but there is some blame to be put on throwing inexperienced actors into these types of roles. Hence, one key hurdle for the modern rise of indie film that often must be overcome.

What are these key scenes? I’ll step back for a moment and discuss what does work, which is roughly 75% of the film. This majority of the film takes place in the military mindset of a mission, prep leading into a mission, or official correspondence and interaction on a military level. On this level, the primary cast works wonderfully, not because of some ingrained acting ability, but because that’s what these SEALs do, this is their job, their lives even. It’s not acting for them, so in that sense it comes off entirely authentic. Combine this with the successfully executed use of dynamic cinematography to capture the intense and often chaotic moments of a mission, and this saves an otherwise doomed concept that could have failed miserably if it had been cast entirely with non-military trained actors. Bravo for the bold move.

However, the remaining 25% of the film deals with civilian life, family and the drama that occurs when not in uniform or on a mission. This is where ACT OF VALOR breaks down. The dialogue is bad, the delivery is forced and in many cases, overly melodramatic. In these scenes, the film takes on a decidedly disappointing made-for-TV daytime drama personality. Fortunately, this is limited enough so that it does not ruin the experience, but add to this an underlying narration from one of the SEALs that delivers a bit of poetic, but unnecessary back story and it becomes just slightly harder to swallow, that is of course until the big guns begin to fire.

Yes, ACT OF VALOR has big guns. There’s more to the film than this, specifically the welcome and positive tribute the film serves as to honor the special ops soldiers, both living and deceased. On the other hand, when it comes to making a financially successful, entertaining movie, it never hurts to have big guns and explosions, which occur on a frequent but not overblown scale. One scene in particular that had me giggling maniacally like a demented 13-year old boy was an action-packed, tension-filled scene depicting the extraction of the team from the jungle that involves… well, big guns and explosions. Yeah, mini-gun’s rule!

The villains, namely two bad guys in collaboration on one nasty scheme against the Unites States, are played rather well by actors Alex Veadoz and Dimiter Marinov. That’s right, they did not cast “actual” terrorists and bad guys in these roles, but in this case, we’re better off. These two men offer a great deal of dramatic punch where the SEALs are unable to deliver on a level we’re used to seeing in big, Hollywood films. There is also an unexpected but welcome and fitting cameo by Emilio Rivera, which will surely delight any fans of the FX series SONS OF ANARCHY.

In the end, the action and intense combat choreography, intense realism in tactics and the somewhat unconventional camera work keeps ACT OF VALOR afloat despite the relatively miniscule acting faux pa while in the civilian moments. On a note regarding the camera work, gamers will find some of the action reminiscent of so many first-person combat games, but the directors were smart and integrated this sparingly when useful, rather than focusing heavily on this for combat scenes. If you enjoy these types of movies, ACT OF VALOR is worth a look, so long as you are willing to bite your tongue and look past the non-military scenes, but more importantly, appreciate the active duty military men and women who are the focus of this film, presented in part as a tribute.

Soldier Rating: 3 out of 5 stars

Civilian Rating: 2 out of 5 stars

Tony the Production Assistant: Boobs, Guns, and Sucking

We Are Movie Geeks welcomes guest blogger Tony Fernandez, a production assistant taking us inside the underworld of indie filmmaking.

Continue reading Tony the Production Assistant: Boobs, Guns, and Sucking