THE LOST LEONARDO – Review

Dianne Modestini and Ashok Roy inspecting the Naples copy of the Salvator Mundi (2019).
Copyright THE LOST LEONARDO – Photo by ADAM JANDRUP. Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics.

“This is the most improbable story that has ever happened in the art world,” is how the subject of the documentary THE LOST LEONARDO is described by one of its expert interviewees. Few artworks as valuable as those by Leonardo DaVinci, so the possibility that a known but long lost painting by the great master has been found generates headlines far beyond the art world. But an interest in art is not needed to be fascinated by the twisty, shocking tale told by THE LOST LEONARDO, a tale more about money and power than art. This top-notch documentary documentary takes us deep into the murky, hidden world of Old Masters art, a story involving extreme wealth, shady financial dealing, greedy institutions, ambition academics, clever auction houses, and basic human foibles, all sparked when a painting that might or might not be DaVinci’s long-lost Salvator Mundi (Savior of the World) surfaces.

It is a wild tale but director Andreas Koefoed’s well-structured documentary keeps everything clear, while giving us the depth needed to understand the background and the various worlds involved. Those worlds are the art world, academics, museums and galleries, auction houses, art dealers and the wealthy clients who buy this most expensive art.

The photography is outstanding and, along with a bouncy score, lends a caper-film vibe to this fascinating, often jaw-dropping true story. Koefoed brings in many of the principle figures in this story, along with experts on art and the art world, one of the most opaque in existence, to help us keep track. The documentary offers an array of opinions on what this art work really is and the events swirling around it. It features some real characters on screen including the outspoken art critic Jerry Saltz, and insightful art collector Kenny Schachter, whose incisive comments often cut straight to the heart of the matter. Investigative journalists also weigh in, and even an ex-CIA agent.

Evan Beard, global art services executive at Bank of America, a major financer of high-value art purchases, serves as a kind of narrator of THE LOST LEONARDO’s crazy tale, which keeps everything clear and ordered. Beard, who supplied the quote at the start of this article, is a good choice as a narrator, with one foot each in the art world and financial one.

The painting at the center of this crazy story surfaced in an unlikely place, in New Orleans, at an art auction where “sleeper hunter” Alexander Parish spots it. A “sleeper,” as Parish tells us, is a painting that is clearly by a much better artist than the auction house thinks it is. There are many known copies of DaVinci’s Salvator Mundi but the original has not been seen for about 400 years. The painting in New Orleans is labeled as “after DaVinci” but it catches Parish’s eye, and after consulting with Old Masters art dealer Robert Simon, the pair buy the painting for less than $2000 and have it shipped to New York. They immediately see that the work has been extensively repainted, so they send it to perhaps the world’s top art restorer, Dianne Modestini, who cleans the painting of its coats of vanish and poor re-touching. Modestini’s work reveal a heavily-damaged painting with the most of the paint loss in the area of the face. But the less-damaged lower part of the painting is intriguingly like DaVinci. As she restores the painting, this renowned expert becomes convinced it is a genuine Leonardo.

“Everyone wanted it to be a Leonardo,” says Alison Cole, editor of an art periodical, near the film’s start. Her remark helps explain some of the frenzy and madness that ensues, not just among art experts but with wealthy buyers of art. Some of these billionaire see art more as an investment and a way to convert assets into a portable form and are motivated more by that than any real interest in art. But the extensive damage makes it impossible to say with certainty if this painting is an actual Leonardo.

An attempt to establish its provenance, to trace it back to the last known owner, proves incomplete. What really starts the ball rolling is when the painting is sent to a prestigious gallery in London, where top Leonardo experts are supposed to view it. Their opinions are unclear but the curator decides to put the painting in the gallery’s upcoming DaVinci exhibit, and labels it as by Leonardo anyway. The exhibit draws record crowds.

Finding a lost DaVinci would be a coup for any art academic and exhibiting newly-discovered one is a lucrative event for any museum and gallery, so greed and ambition emerge as drivers of events early on. It is easy to imagine this will be a story about greedy owners over-selling the authenticity of a dodgy painting to making a financial killing but, in fact, that is not the case here The real wheeler-dealers and shady dealings are far further up the ladder, and the original owners are small potatoes, as well as the most honest, in this murky high-stakes finance tale. The real sketchy dealings are at the wealthy top, with a Russian oligarch, an unscrupulous Swiss art dealer who also owns Geneva storage facilities the rich use to store valuables to evade taxes, an opportunistic auction house and a Saudi Prince linked to international scandal.

This is hot stuff indeed, filled with twisty, complicated dealings worthy of a thriller and characters who seem like something out of fiction too. There are several very sketchy characters but appealing ones too. Among the most charming and sympathetic figures in the film are the art restorer Dianne Modestini, who becomes overwhelmed by the media frenzy that ensues, peaking when the painting is re-sold at auction for a record breaking 450 million.

It is a wild ride stranger-than-fiction tale, like something out of James Bond but true, and director Koefoed takes us on a outstanding, insightful tour of it. THE LOST LEONARDO opens Friday, Sept. 3, at Landmark’s Plaza Frontenac Cinema.

RATING: 3 1/2 out of 4 stars

GENERATION WEALTH – Review

Limo Bob, 49, the self-proclaimed “Limo King,” Chicago, 2008. An entrepreneur who builds and rents exotic limousines, Bob wears thirty-three pounds of gold and a full-length fur coat given to him by Mike Tyson. Photo Courtesy of Amazon Studios. Photo credit: © Lauren Greenfield, all rights reserved.

GENERATION WEALTH sounds like it’s about income inequality and the One Percent, but it is not.

While Lauren Greenfield’s documentary starts out with footage of the very rich who are the one-percent of the income scale, it quickly shifts.

Even tagline of Lauren Greenfield’s documentary “The American Dream just keeps getting more expensive” suggests that, but while the documentary does start out with footage of the very rich who at in the upper one-percent of the income scale, it quickly shifts to a different, less lofty picture of wealth, a Kardashians, reality show kind of rich. The film would have been better titled “Generation Excess” as excess is the real subject.

Frankly, the documentary is like a recap of Greenfield’s other films. The documentarian’s works include THE QUEEN OF VERSAILLES, about the couple building a replica of Versailles in Florida until the 2008 economic crash bankrupted them, THIN, about anorexia, KIDS+MONEY, about the children of the rich. Wealth is a theme here, but it is about the once-wealthy, the wanna-be wealthy, and disease linked to wealthy nations. It is not about the today’s truly wealthy, which is a missed opportunity.

The documentary bathes us in a ocean of excess in the pursuit of either wealth or some popular culture image of perfection. We meet a woman, a school bus driver, whose obsession with plastic surgery bankrupts her and costs her her children, the children of rock stars and movie stars raised with privilege but struggling to get by as adults, a one-time millionaire now hiding out in Europe to avoid jail time, a porn star who was one of Charlie Sheen’s girlfriends, a limo driver who proudly wears pounds of gold jewelry given him by wealth clients. There are the sad young women with anorexia but then the little toddler beauty queens.

After wallowing in this depressing pop culture swamp, one might just want a bath. Instead, the director offers social commentary on the decay of the idea of the American Dream, from an ideal of being a respected pillar of one’s community to being a bling-wearing media figure, from “keeping up with the Joneses” to “Keeping Up with the Kardashians.” Greenfield notes that this change began in the ’70s with conspicuous consumption and was solidified in the ’80s when “greed” became “good.” But it really took off with the reality shows of the ’90s.

Yet GENERATION WEALTH does have one more interesting side. While this rambling documentary covers a number of topics that are only marginally connected, it also reveals details of the filmmaker’s own upbringing and background, which speaks volumes about the documentarian and her work. The daughter of an anthropologist and a successful doctor, Greenfield attending an exclusive Southern California private school where her classmates were the children of movie stars and other wealth parents, the very people in the documentary. Greenfield’s anthropologist mother spent long periods of time away from her family, a pattern Greenfield repeated in pursuit of her career. Greenfield often left her young children in the care of her supportive husband, something successful men have done with their supportive wives for generations. This insight on Greenfield and her own family are by far the more engrossing parts of the documentary.

Those who can’t get enough reality-show outrageous-ness might enjoy this tour of the underbelly of fame and fortune. GENERATION WEALTH has a misleading title and it is mostly a recap of Greenfield’s previous documentaries, like a rock band’s “greatest hits” album. It is mostly worth seeing for the insights it offers into what makes this filmmaker tick.

GENERATION WEALTH opens Friday, August 10, at Plaza Frontenac Cinema.

RATING: 2 out of 5 stars

CHEAP THRILLS – Fantasia Review

CHEAP THRILLS (2013)

Way back in 1993, the industry was buzzing over the controversial subject matter of INDECENT PROPOSAL. Demi Moore was offered a ton of money to have sexual relations with Robert Redford and we all asked, “What would we do for a million dollars?” This was an intriguing question then and it still is now, but is being paid one million dollars to sleep with another man when your husband agrees to it from the get go really all that taboo by today’s standards?

I say “Hell no! This is 2013 and we want to see some hardcore shit, man!” Thankfully, we have highly principled philosopher filmmakers out there willing to push the envelope and shove our faces in the gritty truth of humanity. I say “Thank you, Mr. Katz! Thank you for showing us how utterly flawed we are and allowing us to enjoy ourselves in the process.” CHEAP THRILLS is exactly what the title suggests and an unfiltered look at our modern moral standards that doesn’t truly settle in until the movie is over and you have sufficient time to digest what has just been seen… and depending on your constitution, possibly also change your shirt.

E.L. Katz wrote, directed and produced CHEAP THRILLS, which is more grind house than full-on horror, as Katz’ history in filmmaking and fandom may otherwise suggest. The story begins innocently enough as Craig, played by Pat Healy, leaves the comfort of his wife’s sexual embrace for another day at work. The moment his front door closes behind him is the moment his life begins to spiral into chaos. Craig’s world is falling apart around him, threatening his family and his home. When he gets to work and learns he’s been downsized, he does what any red-blooded American would do… heads to the local bar to drown his sorrows.

CHEAP THRILLS truly begins at the bar. Craig’s old friend Vince, played by Ethan Embry, shows up and it’s immediately apparent that these two characters no longer have much in common. Craig is a straight-laced family man while Vince never grew up, still parties like its 1999 and makes his living breaking guy’s knees over petty loans. Craig appears weak and defeated by the weight of the world. Vince couldn’t care less, throws caution to the wind. Neither of them is prepared for Colin and Violet.

David Koechner, best known for his role on TV’s THE OFFICE and ANCHORMAN: THE LEGEND OF RON BURGUNDY, carries a surprisingly even performance as Colin, a fun-loving mysterious man throwing money around like its yesterday’s newspaper. Colin is out on the town, celebrating his wife Violet’s birthday. Ridiculously sexy and silent for much of the film, Violet is played by Sara Paxton, who starred along side Pat Healy in Ti West’s unforgettably spooky film THE INNKEEPERS. Violet seems too young and too pretty for Colin, but her quiet and sultry demeanor combined with Colin’s subtle creepiness work well together to develop a sense of uneasiness that festers in the background as the audience teeters between shock and laughter.

CHEAP THRILLS is highly adept at two things on the surface, pleasing the most discerning shock enthusiast and disgusting the more easily offended of viewers. E. L. Katz spares nothing in his endeavor to take the simple philosophical question to a new level. Colin and Violet invite Craig and Vince to join them in celebrating by offering them large amounts of money to do incredibly stupid things. To describe CHEAP THRILLS as INDECENT PROPOSAL meets JACKASS really doesn’t do the film any justice, but it does begin to illustrate what the audience is about to experience. The film has blood and gore, violence, a touch of sex (but no nudity) and an endless supply of moments that will make you wince. Fear not, this is all done in the name of exploring a deeper philosophical question: How far will you go for a large sum of money?

E.L. Katz doesn’t just present a large sum of money and let the dogs loose. Instead, Katz sets up a more complicated scenario involving desperation, family, friendship, betrayal, greed and guilt, a scenario that truly asks the viewer to consider the underlying implications once the film has ended. All of this intelligent filmmaking wrapped up in a disturbingly comical package that features breaking and entering, drugs and alcohol, lust and larceny, bodily mutilation and perhaps one of the most offensive scenes in the history of cinema involving a small, cute puppy dog.

CHEAP THRILLS is a wild ride into depravity derived from desperation. Having earned the Midnight Films Audience Award at the 2013 SXSW Film Festival is a sure sign of this film’s appeal and expected longevity as a cult favorite. Not since John Waters’ films have you seen something as shocking and potentially offensive as you will see in CHEAP THRILLS. Dog lovers beware!

CHEAP THRILLS premieres in Canada on August 4th during the 2013 Fantasia International Film Festival.

cheap-thrills_poster