HANNA – The Review

Those darn pesky secret organizations. They always seem to be on the hunt for people or creatures that just want to be left alone. From E.T. and D.A.R.Y.L. to last month’s alien comedy PAUL, they’re constantly barking into communication devices while just steps behind their quarry. This time they’re after what looks to be a normal teenage girl. But in this case looks are very deceiving. The heroine in Joe Wright’s follow-up to his ATONEMENT, HANNA ( played by Saoirse Ronan )  is so much more than normal.

We first meet her as she tracks a moose through the frozen forests of Finland. After an arrow fails to finish off the beast, she follows the wounded animal. Suddenly Hanna’s attacked by a large man. They fight in the snow. After he departs, Hanna pulls out a gun to finish off the moose. She then skins and guts it, and drags the meat back to an isolated cabin deep in the woods. There she’s greeted by the man who attacked her earlier in the day. It is her father Erik ( Eric Bana ). He tests her on her knowledge of countries and cities and has her repeat a false past history for herself. She’s awakened later for an impromptu self defence lesson. He’s training her for what? Later Erik tells her that she is ready to leave when she wants. After he leaves the cabin, Hanna pulls out a case, opens it, and turns a switch which makes a light begin to blink. She looks down at the homing devices and says, ” Find me.” Immediately at an underground surveillance  facility a technician sees the light appear on a screen. He makes the call to a supervisor, Marissa ( Cate Blanchett ) who gives the order for a retrieval. Erik returns, sees the blinking light, and, after telling her that they will reunite, leaves. Later an armed squadron surrounds the cabin. After many of them are killed by the solitary girl, she is taken to the secret underground headquarters. But Hanna cannot be held very long. Soon she escapes through the desert, befriends a vacationing British family, and tries to make her way to Berlin while Marissa and her underlings are in hot pursuit. Will Hanna see her father again?

HANNA has all of the required action stunts of many film chases thrillers, but it has a much more complex back story than most. The many scenes of quiet character study make the bursts of violence very powerful. Wright has a talented cast for this complex, spy chase caper. Ronan’s HANNA is almost a blank slate. All her life has been in training for this, so she’s fascinated when she discovers electric light, plumbing, television, and a typical teenage girl. Bana’s teacher/ father cannot hide his affection for her even as he trains her to become the ultimate assassin. Of course a film like this requires a strong villain and Blanchett’s Marissa is a great villainess. This pursuit has upset her well-ordered life and at one point she takes out her frustrations while going through her intense nightly dental hygiene routine. The only thing that slows down the pace is the scenes with Hanna trying to relate to the normal family on holiday although Olivia Williams is very good as the ex-bohemian mother. Some great location work  around the globe and expert photography  help make  HANNA a superior action film for moviegoers that want something more than car stunts and nonstop explosions.

Overall Rating: Four Out of Five Stars

Win Passes To See HANNA

Which is stronger- Human Nature or Conditioning? What if you were brought up knowing nothing more than how to kill? Well, you can contemplate those questions with passes to an advanced screening of the new FOCUS FEATURES film HANNA.

The screening for HANNA will be TUESDAY, APRIL 5 at the GRAVOIS BLUFFS GREAT ESCAPE THEATER at 7 PM.

OFFICIAL RULES:

1. YOU MUST BE IN THE ST. LOUIS AREA THE DAY OF THE SCREENING.

2. FILL OUT YOUR NAME AND E-MAIL ADDRESS BELOW. REAL FIRST NAME REQUIRED.

3. ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: Which do you think is stronger: Human Nature or Conditioning?

WINNERS WILL BE CHOSEN THROUGH A RANDOM DRAWING OF QUALIFYING CONTESTANTS. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. PASSES WILL NOT BE SUBSTITUTED OR EXCHANGED.

ANYONE CAUGHT REPRINTING TICKETS FOR DISTRIBUTION WILL BE BANNED FROM OUR CONTESTS! DUPLICATE TICKETS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED!


SYNOPSIS:

Raised by her father (Eric Bana of Star Trek), an ex-CIA man, in the wilds of Finland, Hanna’s upbringing and training have been one and the same, all geared to making her the perfect assassin. The turning point in her adolescence is a sharp one; sent into the world by her father on a mission, Hanna journeys stealthily across Europe while eluding agents dispatched after her by a ruthless intelligence operative with secrets of her own (Academy Award winner Cate Blanchett). As she nears her ultimate target, Hanna faces startling revelations about her existence and unexpected questions about her humanity.

HANNA opens in theaters April 8
Like HANNA on Facebook HERE

Free HANNA Ringtone From The Chemical Brothers

Please enjoy a free Focus Features’ HANNA ringtone written by The Chemical Brothers. To get it on your phone, text HANNA to 4FOCUS (436287). Please note that message and data rates may apply.

Please note that ourtext-to-download does not currently work on Droid and iPhone 3GS phones.

If you have difficulties with the text-to-download, save the attached ringtone onto your phone and set it as your ringtone using your phone settings.

Here’s an exclusive chance to listen to the Hanna score from The Chemical Brothers before its digital release now at MySpace Music where you can stream the entire album and hear it first! http://www.myspace.com/thechemicalbrothers/music/playlists/hanna-soundtrack-2374670

Have another looks at the film’s official trailer here.

Synopsis:

The title character of this adventure thriller, filmed in Europe, Hanna (played by Academy Award nominee Saoirse Ronan (“Atonement”) is a teenage girl. Uniquely, she has the strength, the stamina, and the smarts of a soldier; these come from being raised by her father (Eric Bana of “Star Trek”), an ex-CIA man, in the wilds of Finland.

Living a life unlike any other teenager, her upbringing and training have been one and the same, all geared to making her the perfect assassin. The turning point in her adolescence is a sharp one; sent into the world by her father on a mission, Hanna journeys stealthily across Europe while eluding agents dispatched after her by a ruthless intelligence operative with secrets of her own (Academy Award winner Cate Blanchett). As she nears her ultimate target, Hanna faces startling revelations about her existence and unexpected questions about her humanity.

From director Joe Wright (“Atonement,” “Pride & Prejudice,” “The Soloist”) and writers Seth Lochhead, David Farr, HANNA will be in theaters on April 8, 2011. Check out the film on Facebook here.

Check Out The New Poster For HANNA

Focus Features has debuted this brand new poster for HANNA. From the trailer below, this looks to be one of the most suspenseful, fascinating films of 2011.

Synopsis:

The title character of this adventure thriller, filmed in Europe, Hanna (played by Academy Award nominee Saoirse Ronan (“Atonement”) is a teenage girl. Uniquely, she has the strength, the stamina, and the smarts of a soldier; these come from being raised by her father (Eric Bana of “Star Trek”), an ex-CIA man, in the wilds of Finland.

Living a life unlike any other teenager, her upbringing and training have been one and the same, all geared to making her the perfect assassin. The turning point in her adolescence is a sharp one; sent into the world by her father on a mission, Hanna journeys stealthily across Europe while eluding agents dispatched after her by a ruthless intelligence operative with secrets of her own (Academy Award winner Cate Blanchett). As she nears her ultimate target, Hanna faces startling revelations about her existence and unexpected questions about her humanity.

From director Joe Wright (“Atonement,” “Pride & Prejudice,” “The Soloist”) and writers Seth Lochhead, David Farr, HANNA will be in theaters on April 8, 2011. Check out the film on Facebook here.

HANNA Trailer

Focus Features has released the first trailer for Joe Wright’s action film HANNA starring Saoirse Ronan, Eric Bana, Jason Flemyng, Tom Hollander, Olivia Williams and Oscar winner Cate Blanchett.

Decidedly very different from Wright’s PRIDE AND PREJUDICE & ATONEMENT isn’t it? Definitely one to keep your eye on in 2011.

Synopsis:

The title character of this adventure thriller, filmed in Europe, Hanna (played by Academy Award nominee Saoirse Ronan [“Atonement”) is a teenage girl. Uniquely, she has the strength, the stamina, and the smarts of a soldier; these come from being raised by her father (Eric Bana of “Star Trek”), an ex-CIA man, in the wilds of Finland. Living a life unlike any other teenager, her upbringing and training have been one and the same, all geared to making her the perfect assassin. The turning point in her adolescence is a sharp one; sent into the world by her father on a mission, Hanna journeys stealthily across Europe while eluding agents dispatched after her by a ruthless intelligence operative with secrets of her own (Academy Award winner Cate Blanchett). As she nears her ultimate target, Hanna faces startling revelations about her existence and unexpected questions about her humanity.

HANNA will be in theaters on April 8, 2011. Check out the film on Facebook here.

Source: Yahoo! Movies

Review: ‘The Time Traveler’s Wife’

timetravelerswifemovie

I want to begin by telling you up front that what I am about to say may shock some of you. In fact, some of you may choose never to read my reviews again. Prepare yourselves, because I am about to make one bold statement… THE TIME TRAVELER’S WIFE is one of the best love stories EVER told. There. Now, that wasn’t that bad, was it? With that said, I would liked to have seen a few better casting choices.

The film was based on Audrey Niffenegger’s novel of the same name, adapted for the screen by Bruce Joel Rubin (GHOST, JACOB’S LADDER) and directed by Robert Schwentke (TATTOO, FLIGHT PLAN). At one hour and 47 minutes in length, the film can feel a bit slow at times in the first two acts, but the pace of the third act certainly makes up for having patience. The film is not perfect and it has it’s flaws, albeit few, but the story is simply marvelous and brilliantly combines the romance and science-fiction genres in a way that respects both, but is not easily restricted to either camp.

The movie follows research librarian Henry De Tamble, a man with a unique condition that proves to be both a curse and a blessing. Henry has a (fictional) genetic anomaly called chrono-impairment, which causes him to spontaneously travel through time, leaping from one significant moment in his and his families lives to another. Henry wields extremely limited control over his condition, which seems to be triggered by various sources of stress. Despite the inconvenience and occasional danger that his condition burdens him with, Henry manages to develop a meaningful and honest relationship with an artist named Clare Abshire. Clare is merely a child when she first meets a forty-something version of Henry in a meadow near her wealthy family’s home. From that moment, the two are seemingly destined to be together. They develop their relationship from friendship into lovers as Henry repeatedly visits Clare at different stages of her life, allowing him a very personal and coincidentally wise insight into her heart.

THE TIME TRAVELER’S WIFE can be split into three distinctly separate areas of focus. Two of these areas excel at accomplishing what they set out for while the other falls a bit short. The acting in this film was not bad. I particularly felt Arliss Howard (FULL METAL JACKET, AMISTAD) gave a wonderful performance as Henry’s father Richard, despite his minimal screen time. The character really came to life for me and I personally would have loved to see his character influence the story on an even deeper level. Ron Livingston (THE COOLER, LITTLE BLACK BOOK) was both funny and talented in the often awkward role of Gomez and managed to successfully bring the comic relief into the story at a tone and tempo that made me laugh but not too much. This is not a romantic comedy by any means, but the story has a few rough emotional moments and Livingston’s touch adds to the overall texture of this tapestry.

As for the stars of the film, Rachel McAdams (RED EYE, STATE OF PLAY) was perfectly fine. She doesn’t give a stellar performance, but it does hold up for the role’s requirements and she is definitely easy on the eyes and ears. I’ll give Rachel a solid “B” for her efforts and ability to maintain the flow of the film. Eric Bana. (sigh) What can I say about Eric? What I am not going to do is call him a talentless hack, because he is not and others say this far too often in my honest opinion. However, the problem with Eric Bana (HULK, MUNICH) seems to be a lack of self-acknowledgement regarding his own range and ability to properly emote. He tries very hard, I truly believe that with every fabric of my being, but sometimes trying isn’t enough. Frankly, I haven’t fully accepted him in a role since CHOPPER (2000). Too many of his scenes in THE TIME TRAVELER’S WIFE fall just short of convincing, but they’re close enough for me to have let them slide past my radar and enjoy the film.

Now for the good parts! I found myself pleasantly surprised by the overall performance given by the child actors in this movie. Alex Ferris plays Henry at the age of six and does a commendable job, even with his limited role. By far, the players who astonished me the most were the three young actresses who portrayed Clare and her daughter Alba, all of whom had to play their characters at two different ages. Brooklynn Proulx plays Clare at the ages of six and eight. Not only does she fit the image of a young Clare Abshire, she also succeeds at showing up her adult counter-part with a magical charm and radiance. Tatum McCann plays Alba at the ages of four and five while her real-life sister Hailey McCann plays Alba at the ages of nine and ten. Together, they sell young Alba as a smart and fascinating girl with a special inheritance.

I’ve already spoken of my feelings towards the story, which paints a wonderfully rich and believable romance that occurs despite the oddest of circumstances. The realism of their relationship holds up because it isn’t a storybook romance. Henry and Clare have their share of problems, from arguments to tragedy, including Henry’s genetic disorder that fuels both the good and bad sides of the characters’ personalities. Simply stated, THE TIME TRAVELER’S WIFE is a superbly crafted screenplay.

The third and perhaps most under-appreciated element of success in this film comes from behind the camera. Schwentke does a fine job directing the film, especially considering the level of performances he nurtured from the child actors. More than this however, I have to give credit to Florian Ballhaus (FLIGHTPLAN, MARLEY & ME) for her sumptuously vivid cinematography. THE TIME TRAVELER’S WIFE is warm and inviting at times, but also cold and painful when it needs to be. The colors are rich, the depth of field she uses throughout the film is awe-inspiring and she has a keen eye for how to frame a shot. While I’d love to see her get recognition for her work come Oscar time, I realize it’s probably a long shot.

For all intensive purposes, THE TIME TRAVELER’S WIFE utilizes just the right amount of subtle special effects as not to get in the way, or pull the audience out of this story. The non-linear relationship of Henry of Clare is fully engrossing, even if the acting leaves us wanting at times. While not extraordinarily impressive in their technical prowess, the special effects do what they’re intended to do in this movie and nothing more… they do their job. They help to convey the idea of a man who has a genetic predisposition to spontaneous time travel rather than showing up to show off. I applaud this approach with absolute appreciation.

Overall, THE TIME TRAVELER’S WIFE is an excellent film, not perfect, but absolutely worth paying to see in the theatre. Clearly, the film will appeal more to the average female cinematic tastes, but I beg and plead to the guys out there that this is NOT your average chick flick. Do not allow others who may want to lump THE TIME TRAVELER’S WIFE into a throw away category of sappy romantic melodramas to dissuade your interest. Doing so would be an unfortunate miscalculation of the film’s intention.

Review: ‘Funny People’

funnypeoplemovie

Suggesting that funnyman filmmaker Judd Apatow is a comic genius is like suggesting the world is round… it’s old news. It’s well-established that the man behind so many of today’s most hilarious and successfully crafted cinematic comedies can practically do no wrong. Well, he’s produced a couple of stinkers, but as a writer and director he’s nearly unbeatable. Shall I say he’s this generation’s Mel Brooks? No, his films are nothing like Mel’s. I’m merely suggesting he is that kind of comedic powerhouse.

FUNNY PEOPLE is, believe it or not, only the third feature film with Apatow as director. Having both written and directed this newest project, the film clearly has the feel of being a very personal project. How much of the inspiration from this story comes from his own life is unknown, but any good writer or artist will tell you that there’s always a bit of themselves in their work, whether they like it or not.

Adam Sandler plays George Simmons, an absurdly wealthy and successful comedian turned movie star, having made a fortune from making crappy kid’s movies and big studio comedies. Seriously, this guy’s house is nuts, so think of Simmons on the level of Jim Carrey, for example. We quickly learn that George has a rare form of leukemia and the news of his chances for recovering rock his world. At first, George opts to play it cool and not tell anyone his bad news. But as the burden of keeping this knowledge to himself begins to wear on him, he seeks solace from fellow comedians.

George happens to meet Ira Wright, played by Seth Rogen, an aspiring yet not well-hones stand-up comedian that somehow sparks George’s curiosity. In an effort to make the best of his remaining time, George hires Ira as an assistant and asks him to write jokes for him to start performing stand-up again. Ira lives with his two roommates Leo (Jonah Hill) a slightly more successful stand-up comedian and Mark (Jason Schwartzman) an ego-driven, less talented semi-star of a WB-style teen sitcom called YO TEACH. Ira also works at a local grocery store to make ends meet while struggling at his comedy, so being asked to write for George Simmons in a windfall.

Ira and George develop an awkward implied friendship. They’re an odd couple, but it works and they feed off each other, personally and professionally. The humor in FUNNY PEOPLE is smart, real and filled with substance, while not ignoring the type of writing and dialogue that has made past Apatow films so great. This is really more of a dramedy than any of his other films. FUNNY PEOPLE deals with some fairly sensitive human emotions and experiences, including that of realizing the one George let get away was his own fault. Leslie Mann plays Laura, George ex-girlfriend from 12 years past that nearly became his wife, but is now married to an Australian rugby-obsessed businessman played by Eric Bana.

FUNNY PEOPLE is a film about what’s truly important in life and what things like fame and fortune can do to us. It’s a film about how sometimes we need a serious wake-up call in life, an uncomfortable moment as we stare into the face of death to truly realize that the life we lead isn’t always the life we want. George isn’t perfect. Far from it as we witness him make many of the same mistakes over and over again in life, even after he faces it’s potential end and it’s that strange relationship he shares with Ira that will ultimately define how he pursues his second chance at life.

FUNNY PEOPLE is a real treat, laying out a wonderful story with great comedy both on and off the stage. Rogen’s performance has two stages, as he begins as a painfully struggling amateur that instills the need to cringe but develops over time into a more polished and promising comedian. The moments on stage from Sandler and Jonah Hill are near priceless. There’s an element of watching Lenny Bruce’s downward spiral from entertaining comical brilliance to over-bearing political indulgence as George Simmons takes his sickness on stage with him in one scene and a hush falls over the crowd and he slips into a very dark place. It’s an extremely powerful scene as George has some inner moment of harsh clarity.

The cast also includes Aubrey Plaza (Mystery Team) as a fellow amateur comedian and Ira’s love interest, The RZA as Ira’s co-worker in the grocery store deli, Aziz Ansari (Parks and Recreation) as another comedian as well as several surprise guest appearances playing themselves as friends and colleagues of George Simmons. Another element of the film that plays an unlikely but welcome role in the film is the music, featuring artists uncommonly heard in such big films like the brilliant Wilco.

Long story short, FUNNY PEOPLE is almost entirely a grand slam. The only real complaint I have about the film is the long segment at Laura’s house when George and Ira visit. This portion of the film does drag a bit and takes up precious screen time with non-essential plot elements that could have been effectively touched upon in a much shorter and refined approach. The total running time for FUNNY PEOPLE is 146 minutes, but a good 30 minutes or so could have been cut and the film would have been a that much better. Otherwise, FUNNY PEOPLE is a fun and light-hearted comedy with Apatow flair and a good, inspiring story that will have you leaving the theater feeling satisfied.

Review: ‘Star Trek’

startrek

The Summer movie season is poised for launch, and JJ Abrams and crew are about to light the fuse.   ‘Star Trek’ is the perfect movie for this time of year, an epic, sci-fi escapade that brings all sorts of escapist fun into theaters.   It’s got action.   It’s got laughs.   It’s got romance.   Well, a little romance, and not from where you might expect.   But, what’s most important, it’s got brains.

Now, before you think you’re going in to see the $250-million version of ‘Primer,’ let me stifle those belief right now.   This isn’t the most ingenius storyline to come down the pike.   But, where ‘Star Trek’ succeeds where so many, other, big-budget, Summer movies fail horribly, is in the tightly wound ways screenwriters Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman flesh out the characters.

No one gets lost in the mix.   Everyone has their respective moments to shine.   If you’re favorite ‘Star Trek’ character growing up was Sulu (played here by John Cho), fear not.   He gets his moment.   Same goes for Chekov (Anton Yelchin), Uhura (Zoe Saldana), Scotty (Simon Pegg), and McCoy (Karl Urban).

The film’s lead characters, Kirk and Spock, played by Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, respectively, clearly have the most amount of screen time, and it’s odd to think that one got billing over the other (Pine over Quinto here).   However, don’t think that just because the driving forces behind the film are Kirk’s destiny and Spock’s logic vs. emotions conflict, this means the other characters in the film get any kind of short-change.

Orci and Kurtzman do an incredible job at taking us back to these characters in their earlier days, long before the Tribbles or Khan showed their faces.   They do two things with their screenplay.   They set it up so that the film can rest gently in with the established canon of the ‘Star Trek’ universe, and they also create a world where anything can happen.   I’m sure Trekkies all over the galaxy would have issues with certain liberties the screenplay takes with the characters and events depicted.   However, all of that naysaying can be brushed aside.

The amazing opening sequence of the film quickly introduces us to Nero (Eric Bana), the villain of the film, who has traveled back in time through a black hole to take on some kind of revenge.   He seeks Mr. Spock, and we get a quick glimpse of the man he is searching for.  Ã‚   It is Leonard Nimoy, the man Quinto will grow into.   After a few introductions, Nero unleashes his strength, and what ensues is both eye-opening and grin-inducing.   With that opening scene, Summer officially kicks in.

We are shown early moments from Kirk and Spock’s childhood.   On their respective home planets, they ready themselves for adulthood, each one in his own way.   Jump forward a number of years when each one is about to join Starfleet Academy (although Kirk doesn’t know it just yet).   I was worried with a “prequel” to the ‘Star Trek’ series and films, Orci and Kurtzman would write a ‘Harry Potter’-esque film that showed the characters going through school, taking classes on warp drives and speaking Klingon.   Fortunately, the screenwriters and Abrams know how lame this would have been, and the storyline instantly progresses three years to when the cadets get their first assignments.   Enter the USS Enterprise.

Orci, Kurtzman, and Abrams never let the film lag, nor do they ever allow the film to fall into ridiculous moments of either hilarity or over-the-top action. Â  We get subtlety with our big-budget bravado in ‘Star Trek,’ and that is something more Summer movie filmmakers should attempt to accomplish. Â  Much of this is found in both the film’s visuals, which are shocking in how grand they are, and the sound.

This is some of the best sound design work heard in recent years, and sound effect editor David Barbee and legendary sound designer Ben Burtt deserve mentions here. Â  The sound in ‘Star Trek’ knows exactly what to do and when to do it. Â  It cuts out in the dead of space (something I, shockingly, don’t remember seeing since ‘Robot Jox’) and it revs up and kicks in at the most perfect of times. Â  If you are anywhere near an IMAX, this would be the ideal way to see this film for the sound effects alone.

This isn’t to say ‘Star Trek’ is the picture perfect film that goes without issues. Â  There are issues here, particularly with the convenience factor. Â  There are a number of times where elements occur just for the sheer sake of driving the plot, and, during such moments, you can practically choke on the deus ex machina.

An issue that I have always had with ‘Star Trek’ and ‘Star Wars’ alike is how small the universe appears to be despite being made up of hundreds of planets each home to billions of beings. Â  In all this vastness, it still amazes me that two characters having connections to the same story can just bump into one another. Â  A certain Disney theme park song just popped in my head, and I hate it.

Another issue with ‘Star Trek’ is the finale that doesn’t seem quite as grandiose as you would expect given how the film opens. Â  Much of this is in how Bana’s Nero is fleshed out. Â  We understand his pain, and we know full well why he is seeking the revenge that he is seeking. Â  However, there seems to be something missing, and much of this can be found in the way Nero never has a dual side. Â  He is hatred and scowling through and through, and, in the end, that ends up hurting the character.

Despite these minor setbacks, ‘Star Trek’ is an absolute thrill-ride of a motion picture, the kind of big-budget yet story-driven spectacle that needs to be seen more than once. Â  With this new introduction to these characters, Abrams has officially revitalized a franchise that had grown hokey and stale in its later entries. Â  This is ‘Star Trek’ at its coolest, at its best-written, and, certainly, at its biggest. Â  It’s the kind of Summer blockbuster that you should definitely run to see.

Kirk out.

Overall: 4.5 stars out of 5

Tribeca 2009: Day 8 recap

tribecaimage

Today started out with a major disappointment; not with a movie but with New York City traffic. The final press screening for one of the movies I was most looking forward to started at 9:30 am today. Being one of the most talked about films, I decided to leave early so that I would get there around 9 am. For those who do not know, a building collapsed in the early morning hours today in downtown Manhattan. Because of this, traffic was absolutely horrendous. I was stuck on the bus by the Battery Park tunnel entrance for about 30 minutes. I did not get to the theater till 10 am, which screwed up my entire schedule for the day. Worst of all, it made me miss The Girlfriend Experience. Since it already has distribution from Magnolia, and is already ON Demand, I know I will see it soon but I am still mad to have missed it.

I followed my huge disappointment with a screening of Eric Bana’s documentary, Love The Beast, which I originally planned on attending a later screening of. It was a good documentary but overall it was not something special. I believe if it had been about any other racecar driver on the track besides Eric Bana, it would not be in the festival. It is still an enjoyable film but I think I would have loved it a lot more had I been a big fan of cars.

love-the-beast

After loving the Beast, I spent some time online at the DirectTV Tribeca Press Center drinking some free Snapple. I then headed back to see Newsmakers, which is a great Russian film. It is hard to describe because it is mainly an action film; however, there are also some very funny moments, as well as some biting satire of media culture. Newsmaker’s is a remake of the 2004 film Breaking News and there is already talk of an American remake. It will be amazing if done right but more likely it will turn out to be a bastard child of Showtime. The film had an old school action feel to it but it also felt very modern with its various uses of media in the film.

newsmakers

After seeing some bodies hit the floor, I headed home. I haven’t decided yet if I will go tomorrow. I have to work in the morning and I was only planning on seeing 1 film. Since the weather is supposed to be terrible and traffic will suck due to streets still being closed off because of the collapsed building, it may not be worth it. Instead I may stay in and actually catch up on all the reviews I need to write. I also scored a few screeners that I have yet to watch. I’m already taking off Saturday due to work but I will definitely be going in on Sunday for the final day of the festival. Don’t worry though, our coverage will continue well into next week. I am also in the process of setting up interviews with some NY based Tribeca filmmakers so it may run even longer. Hope you are enjoying everything so far.

Jerry Cavallaro – www.AreYouStuckLikeChuck.com

How About a Heavy Helping of International ‘Star Trek’ Posters?

star-trek-poster-int

In addition to the UK poster we showed you earlier today, a whole slew of international posters hit the net today. Â  ‘Star Trek’ posters from all over the globe have sparked up and are right here for you viewing pleasure. Continue reading How About a Heavy Helping of International ‘Star Trek’ Posters?