TIGER WITHIN – Review

Margot Josefsohn as Casey and Ed Asner as Samuel, in TIGER WITHIN. Photo Courtesy of Menemsha Films

In TIGER WITHIN, a Holocaust survivor (Ed Asner, in his final role) befriends a homeless teen (Margot Josefsohn) in Los Angeles in what might be the ’90s. Directed by Rafal Zielinski and written by Gina Wendkos, TIGER WITHIN is a well-intentioned film, touching on antisemitism, hatred, fear, and prejudices, and highlighting the power of forgiveness and kindness.

Those good intentions, plus Ed Asner in his last big screen role, has earned TIGER WITHIN a place in several Jewish film festivals. All that is in its favor but this rambling coming-of-age film is an up-and-down experience, a film that does not always know how best to convey its message and which it sometimes does awkwardly. At times, there is a feeling that the film is not well thought-out or focused, and there are other moments that are simply awkward, even a bit squirm-inducing. Yet, the film is often rescued by fine performances by Ed Asner and young Margot Josefsohn as the homeless girl, either in their own scenes or together. There are also moments of touching humanity, some surprisingly powerful, and the teen character at the center of the story in particular has the feel of a lived experience.

The story begins “somewhere in Ohio and sometime ago” (as the on-screen titles tell us), where Casey Miller (Margot Josefsohn) is a blonde-haired teenage girl who wears heavy makeup on her large blue eyes and dresses in punk/goth style black. Casey has bounced around to various schools as her single mother has struggled to get by, and Casey feels she has to fight to defend herself against everyone. Despite her hit-first defense strategy, we sense her vulnerability, her fear, and her loneliness.

The film illustrates Casey’s inner feelings, with little doodles, presumably hers, in the margins of the screen, and sometimes covering the whole image. The illustrations are one of the film’s more effective devices, both reminding us this is a very young person and giving us insights into the inner life she hides from the world, more effectively that voice-over or dialog might have done.

On her first day at her new school, Casey is passed a note from a boy bearing a rude, suggestive message, and she reacts angrily with a string of expletives. But it is Casey, not the boy, who goes to the principal’s office, where the principal comments on her history of rebellion as he pages through her thick file. No new start here.

Later at a party, Casey dances and a skin-head boy tags her black leather jacket with a swastika. She yells at him, but he assures her it means nothing, an explanation she seems to accept – shockingly.

At home, Casey and her mother clash over school. While her mother seems to care about her daughter, she has a history of not paying close attention to what Casey does at school or even if she actually goes. Angry Casey accuses her mother of caring more about her latest, and abusive, boyfriend, who is pressuring her mother to kick the girl out. Mom decides to send Casey to her father in California, a man who she has little contact with and who now has a wife and two daughters.

At the L.A. train station, Casey keeps out of sight when her father and family first arrive, and listens as the wife, who is not thrilled to take on this rebellious girl, complaining about her. Discouraged, the teen decides she is better off on the street, with the meager funds her mother gave her for the trip. As evening approaches, she hides in a cemetery – a Jewish one as it happens. It is there that elderly Samuel (Ed Asner) finds the girl in the jacket with a swastika, curled up asleep on a grave, when he comes to the cemetery for his daily visit to his wife’s grave. Why would he befriend such a girl? That we will find out.

Naturally, Casey is suspicious of Samuel and his motives but accepts his offer of a meal and then a shower, and after several missteps, his friendship. Samuel is endlessly patient, telling her about his life, his experience surviving the Holocaust, of his lost daughters and his late wife. Gently he answers her questions, consistently demonstrates kindness, and defends and helps her when she needs it.

We don’t know how old Casey is, and her hard manner and curse-laced speech suggests someone older but as the film progresses, we begin to suspect Casey is much younger than we assumed at first. That subtle shift comes along with the budding friendship, and her growing affection for the grandfatherly Samuel.

While the dialog is sometimes awkward, and some scenes are clumsy and heavy-handed in how they deal with the film’s messages, particularly antisemitism, those missteps are often redeemed by the performances of both Ed Asner and Margot Josefsohn. Their performances are alive with human warmth, and convincing connections. There are some scene that have the potential to go very wrong – as the only work the underage Casey can find, in those moments when she takes off on her own, is in a massage parlor, when she steadfastly refuses to provide any service except with her hand. A delicate approach is required but Canadian-born director Rafal Zielinski, who is Polish-Jewish and grew up in various countries, keeps things on the right path, although at times the script takes things close to an uncomfortable edge.

Samuel is a man with a sense of humor as well as justice, and Ed Asner does a nice job as crafting the character. He seems to endless patience for a teen who is very trying at first, even elusive but whom he comes to view as a surrogate granddaughter, while she grows emotionally under his unwavering emotional support. The more Asner’s Samuel pours unconditional positive regard and gentle encouragement towards the right path, the more Casey relaxes and transforms into who she really can be. He encourages her to find her true self, her tiger within.

While Samuel is Casey’s emotional rock, Asner looks very frail at times. It works for the character, but it also tugs at our heartstrings to watch him at times. The scenes with both Asner and Josefsohn as Casey are so good. due both to Asner’s skill but also to the actors’ chemistry with Margot Josefsohn, who may be an emerging talent. Hopefully she will go on to bigger things after this role, despite the film’s shortcomings.

THE TIGER WITHIN’s chief merit is its good intentions and the performances of Ed Asner and young Margot Josefsohn. While it is far from a perfect film, it’s message of hope, forgiveness and kindness, paired with those nice performances, make this sincerely well-meant little film worthwhile for the right audience.

TIGER WITHIN opens in select theaters and video-on-demand on multiple platforms on Friday, July 7.

RATING: 2.5 out of 4 stars

Review: ‘Up’

up-pixar

When you think about it, it has to be a difficult challenge to move your audience with animated characters.  The emotional distance created by not using live action character is something animators have worked to bridge for decades.  Judging from the genres that have come out of the animated world in this span of time, it seems it is easiest to make someone laugh with an animated character.

Evidently, it is very difficult to move someone to tears with an animated film.  ‘Grave of the Fireflies’ was able to do it, but that story was designed to tugg at the heartstrings.  Miyazaki is a master at emitting a certain level of emotion withi his animated characters, but I wouldn’t say any of them would move the viewer to tears.

Picture perfect PIXAR.  That’s really what they should change the name of their company to, because, with ‘Up,’ they do something seemingly effortlessly that has never been done before.  They project an emotion based on their characters alone that has, to my knowledge, never been topped or even matched before.

With 78-year-old Carl Fredericksen, PIXAR has a central character who can elicit emotional responses that range from one end of the spectrum (laughter) to the other (tears).  And, with Pete Docter (‘Monsters, Inc.’) and Bob Peterson (‘Finding Nemo’) at the helm, the film isn’t satisfied with just telling you about Carl.  They show you.

When we are introduced to Carl, he is a child sitting in a 1930s movie theater, watching news reels about famed explorer Charles Muntz who is venturing to South America to discover an elusive, giant bird.  As a child, Carl is a lover of all things adventure, and he finds his lifemate in Ellie, a slightly older girl who also has a passion for adventure.  The two quickly fall in love, and, in an opening montage that ranks up there with the very best, we witness their life together.  They are dreamers, and they desire to run off to South America to be adventurers, as well.  Unfortunately, as is often the case, life intervenes.  Before they can go off on the adventures they had always dreamed of, the couple find themselves aged, and their dreams have fallen behind.  Before too long, Carl finds himself alone.

As an aged widower, Carl becomes a recluse.  City planners are building office buildings around the home he and Ellie made for themselves.  Just as the retirement home is coming to take Carl away, he decides it is time to make his and Ellie’s dreams a reality.  Tying thousands of helium balloons to his house, he lifts off the ground and sets sail for South America.  Of course, nothing ever goes as planned, and Carl soon realizes he is not alone.  An 8-year-old wilderness explorer named Russell is also on board.  The two quickly find themselves in the middle of the adventure Carl had always dream of.

After ‘Up’s emotionally moving opening sequences, the thought of a man tying thousands of helium balloons to his home in order to lift it off the ground takes you aback a little bit.  It is a pretty major change in emotional and logical direction the film takes.  The early moments featuring Carl and Russell in the floating house are, no pun intended, the low points of ‘Up.’  Fortunately, this film isn’t all about the two in the house as they float towards South America.  There are a few moments aboard the house, but, for the post part, ‘Up’ is about the adventure the duo gets into after they find themselves in South America.

‘Up’ is a film that, through and through, is the perfect Summer movie.  It truly has everything you might want.  There is drama.  There is comedy.  There is a grand sense of adventure.  Docter and Peterson, as well as the top-notch animators at PIXAR, truly outdo themselves in every department imaginable.

And, not only does ‘Up’ have all of these elements, it pulls every one of them off brilliantly.  The comedy in ‘Up’ is amazing.  Even certain moments that, on the surface, seem cheap and easy turn ingenious by unpredictable out comes.  There is a pack of guard dogs Carl and Russell come across who are all wearing bark-to-English translators around their necks.  The leader of the dogs is a Doberman Pinscher whose translator is malfunctioning, and the effects on the dogs voice are hilarious, even if you know where the joke is going long before it shows up.

The level of adventure found in ‘Up’ is off the chart, and this is a combination of everything.  The story is such that you care about every character.  The voice acting (Ed Asner as Carl was an inspired choice) solidifies the embodied nature the animators began with the characters.  The lush environment the PIXAR animators put these characters in is breathtaking, oftentimes more beautiful than anything found in the real world.  Docter and Peterson’s direction of the action is superb, never allowing the film to rest for one moment.  Even in the scenes where there is no action, when Carl and Russell are merely trudging through the South American jungle, there is an intensity that is often missing from such, animated features.

PIXAR has always been know for mixing heart and comedy into their films with immaculate results, but this combination has never reached the level found in ‘Up.’  It may not be PIXAR’s best film, and there are, indeed, moments early in Carl’s adventure that don’t quite work as well as others.  Regardless, ‘Up’ is yet another glowing example of the level of work going on at PIXAR.  What’s more, they appear to be doing it with a minimal amount of effort.

Overall: 4.5 out of 5

Review: ‘Gigantic’

giganticmovie

I’m a sucker for indie romantic comedies. There is just something about the combination of unique characters, weird but sweet moments, and raw emotion that peaks my interest. Apparently film festival programmers are the same way. So after seeing the trailer for Gigantic, and 500 Days of Summer right after, I was excited. I have not seen the latter yet but I recently attended a press screening for Gigantic. I really feel that I misjudged the film based on its trailer, although I still really enjoyed the movie.

Gigantic is not a typical indie rom-com. Sure it has unique characters with some bittersweet moments but what is not shown in the trailer is that there is an unexplained homeless assassin hunting down the main character for most of the film. Although not on screen a lot, by utilizing long lenses, the story is sometimes shown to us as if we are spying from what I assume is that third party’s POV. Some of the people I saw the film with seem to have trouble dealing with this element of the story since it mostly goes unexplained for the film. I didn’t mind it. It shows that this movie is not grounded in reality.

The element of this story that is the most grounded is the main character of Brian, played by Paul Dano. Dano plays the character in a soft-spoken but not awkward manner. Brian is not nervous or uneasy when speaking; he is just a quiet and reserved person. He does not show much emotion and is obviously depressed. For most of the film he is trying to adopt a Chinese baby, I believe because he is looking for a normal relationship and he feels he can start one with a child.

Brian is a mattress salesman and at the start of the film Al Lolly, played brilliantly by John Goodman, comes in to purchase a mattress. After learning of the $14,000 price tag, he agrees but tells Brian not to “jew up the price”. He then explains why it is OK for him to use an expression like that. I really enjoyed this character and loved what John Goodman did with the role. He is easily the highlight of the film, at least for me. Shortly after he leaves the store, his daughter Happy, played by Zooey Deschanel, comes to the store to go over the payment. She and Brian connect and start a relationship that seems to be based on sex. Happy has not really grown up since she still has a child-like relationship with her father so she does not seem mature enough to have a real relationship with Brian.

There are some very funny exchanges of dialogue between these characters, with some of the best coming from John Goodman’s Al Lolly. In addition to the writing, I think Matt Aselton did a great job directing, especially since this is his first film. There are some great shots, such as John Goodman lying in the back of the car looking at the buildings as they drive through the city. I also really liked the look of someone spying on the characters that I mentioned earlier.

Overall, this is a fun and strange little film. It is not exactly straightforward but there is also not a lot of meaning behind it. Don’t try to piece it together and figure out what is going on. Just enjoy the movie and accept the absurd. It is interesting to watch and there are some very funny moments. I think John Goodman’s performance alone makes this film a must see.

‘Gigantic’ [R] opens today in Saint Louis at the Tivoli theatre.

[Rating: 3.75 out of 5 overpriced mattresses]

WAMG First Look: ‘Gigantic’

gigantic

I recently received an email telling me about a new film opening April 3rd starring Zooey Deschanel, Paul Dano and John Goodman. Here is the synopsis that was sent to me.

Brian Weathersby (PAUL DANO) is a 28 year-old salesman at a high-end Swedish mattress company. Â  The afterthought child to elderly parents (ED ASNER, JANE ALEXANDER), and the youngest son in a trio of successful brothers, a shady oil man (IAN ROBERTS), a surgeon (ROBERT STANTON), Brian is searching for his place in the world. Â  Unfulfilled by his work he spends a good portion of his day pursuing his goal of someday adopting a baby from China. Â  He gets swept up in a romance with the lovely but misguided Harriet Lolly (ZOOEY DESCHANEL) when she comes in to his store one day and falls asleep on one of the beds. To win her over, he must compete with her bear of a father, Al Lolly, (JOHN GOODMAN) an art-collecting loudmouth with a bad back and deep pockets. Â  GIGANTIC is a funny, surreal love story about the anxiety that comes when two people with crazy families collide unexpectedly and fall for each other.

A little searching brought me to the trailer, which you can view below.  For more info, check out  www.thegiganticmovie.com.

I’m a sucker for these types of movies and I’m looking forward to this one. What do you guys think?

Jerry Cavallaro – www.AreYouStuckLikeChuck.com