Cate Blanchett Signs On To Reprise Galadriel Role In Peter Jackson’s THE HOBBIT

EW is reporting on the latest casting news for Peter Jackson’s THE HOBBIT and the Oscar winning director has asked his favorite Lady of Lothlorien to return once again. You can read the full press release HERE at TheOneRing.net.

The Australian actress has signed on to the cast of director Peter Jackson’s adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien’s fantasy epic The Hobbit, reprising the role of the ethereal elf Galadriel that she played in Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy. The announcement of Blanchett’s casting comes as something of a surprise, since the character of Galadriel doesn’t actually appear in Tolkien’s novel. Then again, there are virtually no female characters in the book whatsoever, so Jackson is clearly looking to balance out the two-part film somewhat in terms of gender.

Jackson also announced that several other lesser-known actors have joined the Hobbit cast. Ken Stott (Charlie Wilson’s War) will play the Dwarf Lord Balin; Sylvester McCoy (Doctor Who) will play the wizard Radagast the Brown; Swedish actor Mikael Persbrandt will play the shape-shifting bear-man Beorn; British actor Ryan Gage will play Drogo Baggins; and New Zealand actors Jed Brophy and William Kircher will play the dwarves Nori and Bifur, respectively.

Conspicuously absent from today’s Hobbit casting news was Sir Ian McKellan, who has stated on his official web site that he will reprise his role from the Lord of the Rings films as the wizard Gandalf but has yet to be officially announced as part of the cast.

The two films will be released in December 2012 and December 2013.

Source: Inside Movies/EW.com

Review: ROBIN HOOD

The film is filled with fun and adventure, allowing the audience an escape to another time and place in history. Exciting and fast-paced, viewers experience the journey of a legendary hero as he plots against the greed and corruption of the king. This is a film that will live on in the imaginations of movie goers for decades to come, iconic and memorable, immortalizing the outlaw with a penchant for doing good.

Now that I’ve invoked visions of Disney’s 1973 classic animated film, let’s discuss Ridley Scott’s 2010 live action ROBIN HOOD. Ridley Scott is a filmmaker whose career in the 80’s produced such indisputable classics as ALIEN, BLADE RUNNER and LEGEND… which led to a modest, yet less fantastic run in the 90’s, and has leveled out to a currently uneven rate of success since GLADIATOR in 2000. As much as it pains me to say it, ROBIN HOOD may turn out to be one of, if not his least accomplished films to date. With that said, I once felt the same about KINGDOM OF HEAVEN, until I watched it again in the director’s cut and found myself with foot in mouth. However, KINGDOM OF HEAVEN is a far more ambitious and solid film as a whole than ROBIN HOOD could ever hope to become with multiple viewings. One could suggest that the failure of this film began with the rewrite, but the script is only the beginning. From there, and as part of the rewriting process, the direction of the film takes the lump sum of the blame for this 140-minute snore fest.

Upon entering the theater, throw all notions of the classical Robin Hood lore out the window, for little of it will apply here. On one level, the film appears to be an unsuccessful and unwanted attempt at a Robin Hood prequel, spending the majority portion of the first two hours shuffling aimlessly through a weak back story for Robin “of the hood” Longstride, played by Russell Crowe, that is worth it’s weight in fool’s gold. Eventually, this relatively uneventful story dissolves into a slowly developing romance of convenience between Robin and Lady Marion, played by Cate Blanchett.

ROBIN HOOD opens with the journey home of King Richard the Lionheart (played by Danny Huston) and his crusading army, plundering their way through France in an effort to recover any riches possible after squandering the royal wealth in a pointless holy war. Robin Longstride is an archer in King Richard’s army, fighting closely alongside fellow soldiers and friends Will Scarlet, played by Scott Grimes, and Little John, played by Kevin Durand. When the king is killed in battle, Robin and his “merry men” set off on their own path, anticipating chaos in an unstable England. Now that we’ve met the “good guys” let’s have a go at the “bad guys” in the story, beginning with Prince John, played by Oscar Isaac, whose immature desire for power clouds his judgment and blinds him to the true motives of his lifelong friend Godfrey, played by Mark Strong. Godfrey has been up to no good and plotting dastardly things. As this plot unfolds, Robin and his merry men, with the help of Friar Tuck, played by Mark Addy, find themselves the force of change with Robin at the helm.

Unfortunately, all this intrigue and back stabbing and plotting takes far too long to develop, often resulting in unbearably boring stretches of inactivity between the rare snippets of onscreen interest. Even the scenery is less than stimulating most of the time, whereas one would expect glorious forests within which Robin and his followers hide and do their thieving, but the visual style is kept mostly dull and washed out, as is likely the case in England, but adds nothing to the efforts of keeping the audience awake. The film also has some strange and unnecessary story elements, such as a band of young boys introduced early on and sporadically and briefly reappearing, until their presence is explained as mostly useless and a tad silly in the end.

With all this negativity, I feel it’s necessary to point out the one positive aspect of ROBIN HOOD. While the pacing, plot and length were all detrimental, the casting and ultimately the performances were pretty close to perfect. Cate Blanchett embodies my vision of what Lady Marion should be, a far better choice than the original option of Sienna Miller, a decent actress in her own right, but no Blanchett. Kevin Durand (SMOKIN’ ACES, 3:10 TO YUMA) was a brilliant choice as Little John, capturing both the physical and personality traits of the character flawlessly. Danny Huston’s performance as King Richard the Lionheart, while brief, was believable and engaging. As always, Mark Strong (SHERLOCK HOLMES, KICK-ASS) thoroughly personifies the villain, rich with the details and intricacies that bring his characters to life. Even Mark Addy from television’s STILL STANDING does his part with subtle comic relief as Friar Tuck. The cast rounds out with veteran actors Max Von Sydow as Sir Walter Loxley and William Hurt as Marshall.

With such a wonderful cast, it’s shameful that the film lacked any real significance or depth. In the end, ROBIN HOOD feels like an extended courtship between Robin and Marion, lengthened with needless filler and a lack of originality. The big climatic battle scene, the petty payoff for staying awake through the first two hours, makes up the final thirty minutes and feels shockingly similar to the first thirty minutes of another, more modern war film. Overall, ROBIN HOOD is 120 minutes of movie that induce cravings for caffeine that places all of it’s action in the final thirty minutes and ends in a way, well… let’s just say that Ridley Scott’s ROBIN HOOD ends the way it should have begun.

Overall Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars

ROBIN HOOD: Early Review

On Wednesday night, Universal Pictures held an early‚ secret screening of ROBIN HOOD at The Landmark in Los Angeles and friends of WAMG were invited to attend. What they reported back wasn’t promising….at all.

When I first heard that yet another version of a Robin Hood movie was in the works, I have to admit I winced. Didn’t you? I mean, really, this story been done numerous times already, resulting in much better movies, most notably THE ADVENTURES OF ROBIN HOOD (1938) with Errol Flynn; ROBIN AND MARIAN (1976) with Sean Connery and Audrey Hepburn; and ROBIN HOOD: PRINCE OF THIEVES (1991) with Kevin Costner. But when I heard the names Ridley Scott and Russell Crowe, I thought maybe there was hope. The GLADIATOR (2000) comparison was obvious. Russell Crowe in period costume engaging in epic battle scenes. We’d have to wait and see.

Unfortunately, it wasn’t worth the wait. What I saw was a movie that really didn’t need to be made. Instead of the traditional “steal from the rich, give to the poor” story of an outlaw and his band of merry men, we got a convoluted back-story of where the famous character came from. As a child he saw his father killed and then was “put amongst men when I was 6 years old.” He grew up and joined the crusades of King Richard the Lionheart (Danny Huston) as an archer and here’s where the movie starts. Most everything after this point seems to happen to him by accident and really don’t feel the need to root for him for any reason.

Scott attempts to get off to a wild start with a battle scene in the first 10 minutes. And Crowe is his usual tough guy self, easily dispatching enemy soldiers, barely breaking a sweat. There are a few battle scenes throughout the movie that are mildly entertaining, but everything in between tends to drag. Keep in mind, he’s not even been declared the “outlaw Robin Hood” yet, he’s just working up to it. And along the way we are introduced to many of the familiar characters – Marian (Cate Blanchett, in a totally lackluster performance, not to mention having absolutely no chemistry with Crowe), Little John, and Friar Tuck (Mark Addy in one of the few bright performances, but can someone tell me if the friar was a beekeeper making moonshine?). Mark Strong’s attempt at a villain (Godfrey) is awkward at best. It almost seems like he is in a totally different movie than everybody else and nobody bothered to tell him. The character of Prince John is almost laughable. He wants to be such a bad-ass, and yet for most of the movie he is throwing out one-liners as if he were in a comedy club.

 

The biggest problem I had with the movie is what I went in fearing the most: the rip-offs. I guess I expected more from Ridley Scott. I know it’s tough to make a movie that has already been made so many times and try to keep it original. But the rip-offs are unnecessary and unforgivable. There is shot in the very beginning of an arrow flying through the air, in slow motion, directly at the camera. This was lifted straight out of ROBIN HOOD: PRINCE OF THIEVES. Hell, it was probably stock footage. Second, there’s the part where the French are storming the beaches in a carbon-copy scene of the invasion of Normandy right out of SAVING PRIVATE RYAN. Spielberg’s gonna be pissed. Then the most egregious of all – a scene where after totally screwing over his subjects with taxes they can’t afford and burning their villages, King John asks the English farmers to help him fight against the invading French. They are all arguing – some for, some against, and up steps Robin to make a rousing speech to the men about fighting for liberty. I SAW THIS SCENE WHEN IT WAS CALLED SONS OF SCOTLAND!!!!! For godsakes, Scott really thought he could pass this off?? Unfortunately, this movie is gonna get clobbered when it is released on May 14th. IRON MAN 2 will most likely still be dominating the box office from the previous weekend and SHREK EVER AFTER will assuredly be #1 the following weekend. The evening, however, wasn’t a complete wash. We did see Harvey Weinstein in the lobby and Julia Louis-Dreyfus on the escalator. 

To think that Universal was really counting on this one…sounds like all the slams on the trailers were correct. For those who can’t wait to see the men of the Sherwood on May 14th, here’s a newly released clip from ROBIN HOOD….

Photos: Universal Pictures
Video Courtesy: Yahoo! Movies

New ROBIN HOOD Trailer Says More in Opening 5 Seconds Than We Needed to Hear

The new (and, seemingly, final) trailer for the latest Ridley Scott/Russell Crowe collaboration, ROBIN HOOD, has been released courtesy of Yahoo! Movies, and that opening shot might be a little too telling.  No, I’m not talking about the guys on horseback charging across a sandy beach towards a grounded ship.  I’m talking about the actual green band that accompanies the trailer.  It divulges that the film has been granted a PG-13 rating.

Suddenly, the thought that this would be GLADIATOR with arrows has slipped away.  That idea, actually, sounded pretty cool.  When I first glanced at Brian Helgeland’s first draft of the film, I noticed how savage it was, how authentic and brutal the violence felt on the page.  Alas, that was a few years ago, and the film has gone through some major rewrites.  Evidently, the savagery has been completely excised.  Now, I fear, we are left with just another Hollywood rendition of the classic tale of Robin and his merry men.

I could be wrong.  I hope I’m wrong.  This new trailer certainly doesn’t do much to tell me I’m wrong, though.  It does, however, give us our first good looks at Kevin Durand as Little John and Mark Strong, who, I fear, is getting to be typecast in these villainous roles, as Sir Godfrey.  It’s also nice to see Maid Marion, played by Cate Blanchett, taking bow and arrow in hand and doing some damage of her own in this one.

See for yourself:

ROBIN HOOD hits theaters on May 14th.

ROBIN HOOD Poster Takes Aim

What with it being right smack in the middle between Christmas and New Years and the news week being what it is, we figured it was time to cover some items over the last couple of weeks to play a little catch up.

First up is this cool poster for Ridley Scott’s GLADIATOR WITH ARROWS ROBIN HOOD.  Okay, that little joke is sure to bring out some ire in people who are looking forward to this, but don’t let it fool you.  There’s nothing wrong with Scott and Russell Crowe trying to recapture what they bottled with GLADIATOR, a bad-ass, big budget epic with a truly iconic lead character.  Here’s just hoping they can do the same thing with a character we’ve seen hundreds of times before.

This poster comes to us from the UK peeps at HeyUGuys.  With the hair, the beard, and that stare that just shrieks “I’m going to rip out your eye and show it to you,” this thing is GLADIATOR through and through.

Check it out:

ROBIN HOOD hits theaters on May 14th, 2010.

First Official Shots From ROBIN HOOD

robin hood 3

I hope, hope, hope that this new ROBIN HOOD film directed by Ridley Scott and starring Russell Crowe is as exciting and as bad-ass as a film directed by and starring the guy from GLADIATOR should be.   We’ve had plenty of these PG to PG-13 versions of ROBIN HOOD stealing from the rich to feed the poor.   I want this thing to be bloody.

Judging by these first, official shots from the film (as well as a couple of behind-the-scenes shots), courtesy of Courier Mail, we might not be getting that.   There’s a lot of horses, a lot of mud being flung, and a whole lot of nothing getting severed from the human body.   Nonetheless, I am holding out hope for the best.   It’s been a long time since Scott wowed me, and it’s been even longer for Crowe.   Here’s hoping for the best.

Check out these shots right here:

robin hood1

robin hood 2

robin hood 4

robin hood 5

robin hood 6

robin hood 7

ROBIN HOOD is set to do some bloodless battle on May 14th, 2010.

Peter Jackson Talks Returning LOTR Characters for THE HOBBIT

lord of the rings

Peter Jackson is making the rounds hyping up THE HOBBIT almost six months before the film even begins production.  This time around, he stepped up to MTV, where he confirmed a couple of LORD OF THE RING characters we might see returning.

Gandalf, being a 2,000-year-old wizard, is still around and plays a major role in THE HOBBIT, and we’re having Ian McKellen reprise.  There’s a couple of other characters: Elrond, who was played by Hugo Weaving [in the original films], and there’s a possibility of Galadriel, who was played by Cate Blanchett.

Jackson was quick to point out the time difference between THE HOBBIT and the LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy.  The new film is a prequel that takes place 60 years before the trio of epic stories, so actors like Viggo Mortensen, Orlando Bloom and Sean Astin won’t be making a return.  Jackson did confirm McKellen’s, official involvement in the film, and he has no worries about bringing Weaving and Blanchett back into the series.

They are elves, so once again, in the realm of Middle-earth, they’re immortal, they don’t age.  We have a process that would start with showing them the script. We’re not [beginning] any official process until we have the ‘official’ script that they can read.

Production is set to begin sometime early to middle of next year with the first film released in December of 2011.  Part two will hit theaters in December of 2012.

Danny Huston the Lionheart

danny huston

He’s no Sean Connery, but Danny Huston has joined the cast of Ridley Scott’s Robin Hood film, which is still as yet titled.   Huston will be portraying King Richard the Lionheart, who, in the Robin Hood legend, is away fighting in the Third Crusade and whose brother, Prince John’s malevolent exploits cause Robin Hood to take arms against the kingdom. Continue reading Danny Huston the Lionheart

William Hurt Joins Ridley Scott’s ‘Robin Hood’ Film

william-hurt

I remember back when this project was first being bandied about. Â  It was called ‘Nottingham,’ it was the Robin Hood story told from the perspective of the Sheriff as if Robin Hood were a villain, it was going to star Russell Crowe, be directed by Ridley Scott, and it was going to be awesome. Â  Now, it just sounds like it’s getting turned into another retread of the same old story.

Anyway, William Hurt has joined the cast of this same old story. Â  He will be playing William Marchall, the Earl of Pembroke, who has been described as the “greatest knight that ever lived.” Â  Whoever said that clearly didn’t see Heath Ledger in ‘A Knight’s Tale.’ Â  He rocked that shit.

Hurt joins a cast that already includes Crowe, Cate Blanchett, Mark Strong, Kevin Durand, Scott Grimes, and Alan Doyle. Â  The film, which is as yet untitled, is currently filming in the UK. Â  It is set for a May 14th, 2010 release.

Source: THR

Cate Blanchett Official for ‘Robin Hood’

cate-blanchett

This is just an update to a previous article we ran, where we gave you the rumor that Cate Blanchett was going to star in Ridley Scott’s ‘Robin Hood’, previously titled ‘Nottingham’.   Word came down today that this news is official.   Cate Blanchett will, in fact, be playing Maid Marian in the new ‘Robin Hood’.

Actor Mark Strong recently spoke with the UK’s The Telegraph where he revealed who may be stepping into Sienna Miller’s role of Maid Marian in the new Ridley Scott film ‘Nottingham’.

“I think Cate Blanchett is set to take the Maid Marian part,” said Strong, who is expected to play Sir Guy of Gisbourne. “She is a wonderful actress and it would make it a much classier film if she was in it.”

Miller was dropped from the project, because she was apparently too slim and youthful for the part.

What do you think?   Is Blanchett a good choice for the part?   Will this end up being a good movie?   Is Sienna Miller really too slim?   Let us now by commenting below!

Source: The Telegraph