OUT OF THE DARK (2014) – The Review

ootp_image

It’s been some time since I’ve had that feeling of being “had,” going into something with hopeful expectations, only to find out that it was all a ruse. Cinema is often like this, drawing us in, capturing our emotions and interests, even playing off our primal instincts. Michael Bay knows the mass loves explosions, so there are always plenty in his films, all of which appear int he films’ trailers. Trailers are another way that we, as viewers, can be duped. It’s a necessary evil, I suppose. The nature of the marketing beast that, inevitably, will always accompany the anticipation involved with being a movie watcher. This has become something of a cultural agreement of modern society. We tolerate in order to be entertained.

I find it “crazy” how individuals associated with one film, generally applauded for being a success, can turn around and be equally associated with a flop, but it happens. This is where the “buyer beware” term is coined. Never judge a book — or, movie — by it’s cover, as they say. This goes both directions. It’s been by experience that, no matter how much you enjoy a director, actor or actress, or perhaps even a writer, never to allow yourself to be drawn into the blind expectation that anyone is perfect. Unfortunately, I allowed this very rule I have self-imposed to be broken.

OUT OF THE DARK (2014) is a film that has done just that, wandered haphazardly out of the dark, only to be blinded by the light of day as it finds an eager, albeit unsuspecting audience. For those fans of the horror/thriller genre accustomed to Netflix, the ratio of good genre films to schlocky and/or just plain bad movies that seemingly pop up out of nowhere is pretty extreme. Nonetheless, at least a minimum of 3-4 of these films will always be present in our queue at any given time, patiently awaiting their 90 minutes of instantly-streamed glory. What we are not accustomed to, and less less tolerant of, is paying inflated theatrical ticket prices to obtain the aforementioned low-grade thrills of b-movies.

In short, this shall be the level of entertainment one receives when sitting down to watch OUT OF THE DARK. I have never been one to unduly criticize a filmmaker for making his/her art, and that’s not about to start now. In all honesty and with full disclosure, I am disappointed with director Lluis Quilez, as this is his feature film debut. On the other hand, OUT OF THE PAST is co-written by Javier Gullon and David Pastor, and I couldn’t be more disappointed. Pastor, who wrote and directed CARRIERS (2009) and THE LAST DAYS (2013) were both of noticeably higher caliber, despite his now well-established obsession with viral epidemics. Gullon wrote ENEMY (2013) for God’s sake, a vastly superior and endlessly cerebral and mesmerizing piece of scriptwriting. How this can be is beyond my comprehension, but its said that oil never mixes with water.

OUR OF THE DARK sets in motion a thriller about two parents searching for their missing child, only to uncover a corporate scandal hidden behind a family secret by way of a ghostly haunting in South America. Chew on that. Sarah, played by Julia Stiles, moves to South America along with her husband Paul, played by Scott Speedman, and daughter Hannah to take over her father’s business. Her father Jordan, played by Stephen Rea, is a respected man in the jungle village as he once helped bring prosperity to the poor indigenous people, but that prosperity has recently suffered due to economic downturn and tragedy. Shortly after arriving, Hannah goes missing, which leads to a witch hunt for creepy children who are suspected by Sarah to have taken her daughter, but of course her search is hindered by silence and secrecy.

Director Quilez has managed to take a dismally uninteresting script and still make a visually engaging film, despite what I imagine is a modestly modest budget. In addition, the special effects for the creepy children are low-grade but effective, a mix of makeup and digital manipulation. The overall effect of the ghostly haunting sequences is somewhat unnerving, so for that I commend the filmmaker in what would otherwise be a relatively forgettable film. As for the cast, Speedman has never gotten me excited for anything, so I’ll stop there. Stiles has ridden the fence for some time now, but ultimately takes a hit in my book with OUT OF THE DARK. She plays this film too safe, far too by the book, theatrically textbook. Perhaps the most unbearable example of this would be the key, climactic scene when she confronts her father, but I also can’t blame Stile and Rea entirely for this, because the dialogue in this scene is so utterly cliche I could nearly recite their lines before they do. The drama gives way to forced melodrama and the emotions are of the instant just-add-water equivalency.

OUT OF THE DARK (2014) is slow to get started, offers little in the way of original material and asks the audience to care way to deeply about 2-dimensional cookie cutter characters in a dispassionately written film that isn’t quite sure if it’s a paranormal thriller or an ecological morality drama. While its an excusable throw-away popcorn rental that at least looks interesting at times, its far from worth paying cinema prices. At least at home, you can kick into MST3K mode if necessary, and not risk getting asked to leave the theater… and the popcorn is a lot cheaper.

OUT OF THE DARK is currently available via VOD and opens in theaters on Friday, February 27th, 2015.

Overall Rating: 2 out of 5 stars

ootp_poster

THE CABIN IN THE WOODS – The Review

“You think you know the story…” so true are those words, it makes writing this review a critical hell, a nightmare of favorably frustrating proportions. The reason for this being, THE CABIN IN THE WOODS is one of those films that requires I not slip up and divulge any of it’s many wonderful details that would spoil the geektastically all-encompassing awesomeness of the film. If you are thinking, “Wow, this guy is selling the film rather hard,” you would be partially correct. Partially, because I’m not trying to “sell” the film at all, but on that rare occasion that a film has such a massive impact on my “happy” endorphins on this level, well… I just simply can’t help myself.

The basic story: Five college friends decide to take a break from their studies and spend a weekend in a, yes, you got it… a cabin in the woods. Curt (Chris Hemsworth, THOR) is the jock, but an unconventionally smart one. Jules (Anna Hutchison) is Curt’s “girl next door” girlfriend and her best friend Dana (Kristen Connelly, REVOLUTIONARY ROAD) is a book smart, semi-virginal good girl reluctantly along for the ride. Jules surprises Dana by inviting yet another — single — intellectual jock named Holden (Jesse Williams, BROOKLYN’S FINEST) with the hopes the two will hook up during their cabin retreat. Finally, Marty (Fran Kranz, THE VILLAGE) is the wise, but paranoid stoner and fifth-wheel on this wilderness trip. These five young men and women willingly enter into a seemingly harmless cabin in the woods, unsuspecting of the true and necessary horrors that await them… all for 105 perfectly pleasurable minutes of thrills, frights and laughs.

THE CABIN IN THE WOODS comes from the mind(s) of a genius — to some, many — co-written by Joss Whedon (SERENITY) and Drew Goddard (CLOVERFIELD) whom, with this film, also makes his directorial debut. Many fans obviously know of Joss Whedon from popular TV series including Firefly, Dollhouse, and Buffy. Perhaps less known, but equally talented is Drew Goddard, whom also has had his writing hands in the popular TV series cookie jar with Buffy, as well as Angel, Lost, and Alias. Putting these two minds together was shear brilliance, but unfortunately the recent troubles which befell the house of MGM held this film on the shelf, a film completed way back in 2011. With that said, we now get to enjoy not only this film, but THE AVENGERS, also directed by Joss Whedon, both opening this summer. (I may giggle like a school girl now. Don’t judge me.)

What is the secret of THE CABIN IN THE WOODS? You know I can’t tell you that, or else… I’d have to kill you. Seriously. If I told you that, someone would surely kill me as well. What I can tell you is that all the beautifully cheeky, sarcastic humor Joss Whedon is so well known for is alive and well. Whedon and Goddard mostly give Fran Kranz free reign over comic relief, serving up a hilariously witty performance as Marty, stoned nearly the entire film, constantly the ignored voice of reason. Marty is sort of a combination of SCREAM’s Randy, but with the personality of Alan Tudyk. I love Alan Tudyk, but that’s irrelevant.

The film opens with anything but the most logical, predictable scene for a horror film set in a cabin… in the woods. We meet two middle-aged men — Sitterson and Hadley — dressed in white, short-sleeve dress shirts and pocket protectors. No, these aren’t an updated, live-action, nerdy version of The Muppets’ Statler and Waldorf… actually, in a way I guess they could be. Sitterson (Richard Jenkins, THE VISITOR) and Hadley (Bradley Whitford, BOTTLE SHOCK) run a mysterious laboratory in a large, sterile facility staffed with equally laboratory-esque types. The opening scene, a quirky quick-witted exchange between Sitterson and Hadley, could quite possibly be one of the funniest moments in the film, setting the tone and calibrating the audience laugh-o-meter for heavy usage.

Following this scientifically silly exchange, we’re introduced to our five college friends and the journey begins. You’ll laugh, you’ll cry (from all the laughter) and then — in due time — you’ll shriek at the craziness of the building carnage that Whedon and Goddard conjure up as they slowly unveil the truth of THE CABIN IN THE WOODS. Now, while I cannot divulge any specific details, I can say with relative safety that the general gist of the “big” secret will become apparent somewhere around the halfway point, or at the very least, you should begin the suspect. However, as they say… “the devil’s in the details.” In other words, PAY ATTENTION! I believe it’s literally impossible for anyone to fall asleep during this film, unless shot with a tranquilizer, but watch closely to catch all the finer, even subtle little Easter eggs planted within the film, including film homages, insider gags, familiar knock-off characters, and even, perhaps… maybe… a secret cameo, or two? Hmm… I’m not saying anymore.

THE CABIN IN THE WOODS is smart, witty, fast-paced, comedic, horrific fun… the most refreshing, perfectly executed horror movie experience I’ve seen since James Gunn’s SLITHER (2006). The special effects are splendidly rendered, CGI done well — sparingly (well, till the end when the proverbial sh*t hits the fan) but effective — and monster fans may or may not be in for one helluva treat as well. There’s action, there’s romance (loosley defined) and tragedy, there’s conservatively utilized bloody and gory violence, suspense, of course there’s mystery, and even a touch of science-fiction mixed with a dash of folklore. (Oh, no. I’ve said too much. I’ve said enough. — Michael Stipe)

My Promise: Go, run to see CABIN IN THE WOODS! You will not see another horror film this good all year, well… not until sometime (maybe) in October, but that’s not confirmed yet. If you don’t enjoy this film, you’re demented.

Overall: 5 out of 5 sacrificial lambs