Movie Melting Pot…’Pusher’ (Denmark, 1996)

pusher

Director Nicolas Winding Refn is becoming a name around the world for his unflinching blow to your visual sense with ‘Bronson.’   Many will look back in years down the road and look at that film that launched Refn’s career as a mainstream filmmaker.   However, ‘Bronson’ is far from Refn’s debut as a director.   It has been 13 years since his first film, ‘Pusher,’ and, though he has grown more confident as a filmmaker, his debut is just as riveting and stark as anything he has done since.

Kim Bodnia stars as Frank, a mid-level drug dealer on the streets of Copenhagen.   Frank wants to make it big, and he sees his opportunity for great things when he is confronted by a former cellmate.   The two set up a large deal, and Frank must go to a local supplier, Milo, to get the drugs.   Frank owes Milo money from previous deals, and he does not have the money to cover what he is about to take from Milo.   Milo, being the generous drug supplier that he is, gives Frank the drugs on the condition that Frank returns with the money as soon as possible.   All seems to be going well, until the police intervene, and Frank is forced to throw the drugs into a local lake.

What follows is an intense ride through Frank’s life as we witness him doing everything he can to get back the money he owes Milo.   Things go from bad to worse to even worse as Frank’s window of time begins to close in on him.

While there is so much to like about ‘Pusher,’ Kim Bodnia really is the star of the show here.   Frank is in every scene of the film save for one, and even moreso than being a drug dealer, he is a despicable man.   Never thinking about plans for the future, Frank does exactly what is necessary to get him from situation to the next.   He has a girlfriend, a prostitute named Vic, who has deep-rooted feeling for Frank.   Frank only uses Vic for his own purposes, and the only times he makes any indication of having a life with her is when it suits needs first and foremost.   He won’t even have sex with the Vic, because her profession disgusts him so much, yet he keeps going back to her, dragging her along just to get what he needs from one moment to the next.

This level of egoism is made all the more evident when Frank breaks down and goes to his mother for help.   Having not seen her son for years, she wants to know that he is okay, that he is taking care of himself.   All Frank wants is money, and, when he realizes she has none to give, he turns on her, shutting her out of his life once again.   It is a hard moment to watch in a film full of them, and Refn’s implacable sense of place and movement projects the viewer into Frank’s world.

Despite the aversion one might, and probably should, have for Frank, you cannot help but hope he makes it through this situation unscathed.   You keep thinking maybe, just maybe, he’ll come around, find a way to pay off Milo, and run off with Vic to some secluded part of the world.   Most of this level of hope stems from Bodnia’s performance.   Bodnia is extremely likable, almost sympathetic in his portrayal.   You believe Frank, because you want to believe Frank, and you want to believe Frank, because you believe Bodnia’s sincerity in the performance he gives.

You believe the character, also, due to the incredible style Refn gives the film.   Like an unstopping train through the streets of Copenhagen, Refn shoots the city with a vitality that makes the city come alive, the streets Frank must work become a character unto themselves.   Mid-way through the film, you almost begin to believe that the story is Frank against the city, but it becomes all the more evident as time passes that this is a story of one man against himself.

And that is what ‘Pusher’ truly boils down to.   Frank is an addict, but his drug is not anything you can buy or steal.   It’s chaos, and it follows Frank wherever he goes whether he is the source of it or not.   Even when things are beginning to take a turn for the better, Frank finds a way turn it on its ear and come out the worse for it.   He pushes away anyone who might care for him, anyone who might love him, and that alone gives the film’s title a shadowy, comfortless dual meaning.

As absorbing as ‘Pusher’ is, it didn’t find release in the United States until a limited release in 2006.  By that time, the film had spawn two sequels, each delving a little deeper into a secondary character.  ‘Pusher II,’ released in Denmark in 2004, follows Frank’s former partner, Tonny, played with colorful fascination by Mad Mikkelsen.  Mikkelsen is probably the most recognizable of the actors in the ‘Pusher’ trilogy, as he went on to play the villain, Le Chiffre, in 2006’s ‘Casino Royale.’  ‘Pusher III’ follows the Serbian drug lord Milo, whose story comes full circle in this final chapter of the ‘Pusher’ saga.  Each film opens with each of the lead actors standing against a dark background, hard music driving the beat and bottom-running subtitles giving their names.  Each film is a powerhouse from Refn, but it is his first that is the most memorable.

That goes for all of Refn’s films.  Even the inescapable power from ‘Bronson’ isn’t told with as much raw nerve as ‘Pusher.’  The director has become more polished in his later years, but it is still his first film that remains his crowning achievement.  Told with a cutting style and cinema verite at its grittiest, ‘Pusher’ is a film that, 13 years later, is just as staggering and as weighty as it ever was.

Movie Melting Pot… ‘Dante 01’ (France, 2008)

dante01movie

Have you ever been really excited about seeing a movie based on you past experience with a filmmaker, only to be mostly disappointed and become frustrated by your wasted enthusiasm? Well, that’s sort of what my experience with Marc Caro’s newest film ‘Dante 01’ was like.

If you’re not familiar with the name, Marc Caro co-directed ‘Delicatessen’ and ‘The City of Lost Children’ with Jean-Pierre Jeunet, but ‘Dante 01’ is Caro’s first feature film in ten years and he’s gone solo this time. The dark fairy tale fantasy elements that made ‘Delicatessen’ and ‘The City of Lost Children’ such fascinating experiences are absent in this science fiction thriller that attempts to draw more on Jeunet’s style and tone for ‘Alien: Resurrection’.

‘Dante 01’ takes place in the future. The title refers to a remote incarceration station deep into remote space that orbits around a fiery molten planet. The station houses two doctors, three security guards and seven mentally unstable criminal inhabitants. The station resembles a structure made of Rubik’s cube-like blocks with levels referred to as “circles of Hell” as the story is loosely based on Dante’s Inferno, although “loosely” is a term used here with much creative license.

A new prisoner arrives at Dante 01 accompanied by a new doctor Elisa (Linh Dan Pham) and is introduced into the world of it’s psychologically disturbed residents. Elisa attempts to encourage the residing doctors to embrace her new protocols for treatments, but Persephone (Simona Maicanescu) is already beginning to fear the worst for the entire station as the new prisoner, given the name Saint Georges (Lambert Wilson) by his fellow crazies, hides a secret and powerful force within himself. The cast also includes the regular Dominic Pinon (Delicatessen) as one of the seven inmates.

While the backstory of what happened to Saint Georges prior to his incarceration on Dante 01 is dealt with on minimal level, it is revealed that he was found on a ship alone and covered in blood and that he encountered some powerful alien force. Now, held on Dante 01, the “force” is taking him over and will ultimately bring upon the fate of everyone on board. The characters in ‘Dante 01’ are not very well developed and not a single character in the film inspires any empathy or likability from the viewer. Watching ‘Dante 01’ is sort of like watching ‘The Faces of Death’ in that you have no real interest in the characters other than to see the details of their inevitable deaths.

‘Dante 01′ is not all bad, though, despite my distaste for the story and disappointment with the overall outcome. Visually, the movie is actually very engaging and creative. The production design and cinematography are dark and morbid, as opposed to being cold and sterile as was the direction in George Lucas’ ‘THX-1100’, which was another futuristic film with lots of bald people. ‘Dante 01’ has the visual feel and tension of ‘Cube’ combined with the shadow-rich lighting and rich color palette of Jeunet and Caro’s previous two films.

Even with a small budget, ‘Dante 01’ manages to develop some great set design and special effects, even if they aren’t put to the best use. As the story develops further and the events unfold, the use of special effects increase to further enhance the interpretation of what is happening to Saint Georges. By the end of the film, ‘Dante 01’ begins to feel a bit like a French remake of Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ with it’s solitary depictions of Saint Georges, heavily entrenched in mesmerizing special effects sequences intended to convey the state of his mind and being as he drifts in space, approaching his own fate.

Caro clearly has taken much influence from his previous experiences on films with Jeunet as well as influences from other films to piece together what could be called his first widely released solo venture. In all honesty, the cast did a fine job with the story they had to work with, but Pinon (as usual) tends to stand out. All things aside, ‘Dante 01’ only manages to maintain interest through it’s visual appeal and would otherwise have failed on a more complete level than it did.

The 100-minute ‘Dante 01’ DVD released under the Dimension Extreme banner on April 21, 2009 and features the original French audio along with English and Spanish subtitles and an English dubbed track, which is quite a rare thing to appear on a French film. Aside from the movie itself, the only real perk of the DVD is a making-of featurette which is actually fairly interesting, maintaining the same hypnotic musical score by Raphael Elig and Eric Wenger that presides over the film.

Movie Melting Pot…’Who Can Kill a Child?’ (Spain, 1976)

who-can-kill-a-child

There’s a nice, little website out there that some of you may or may not have heard about.  On it, you answer a series of multiple choice questions about yourself.  Questions range from “What’s your body type?” to “What describes your best sense of balance?” to “How high can you kick?”  You answer all these questions, and, voila, the site calculates for you how many five-year-olds you can take in a fight.  

The website is www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com.  Pretty self-explanatory.  

Of course, whether or not you are physically capable of fighting a child is one thing.  You have to go through the moral dilemma of whether or not you even want to fight a bunch of five-year-olds, something the site doesn’t take into account until the third page in.

And so it is, with Narciso Ibanez Serrador’s film, ‘Who Can Kill a Child?’. Serrador, who claims the novel by Juan Jose Plans was based on his screenplay and not the other way around, asks this question of his main characters and of the audience.  What would it take for you to turn your sense of violence against a child?  Of course, the kids in ‘Who Can Kill a Child?’ make this question a whole helluva lot easier to debate.

The film takes place on a small island just off the coast of Spain.  A couple of English tourists, played by Lewis Fiander and Prunella Ransome, decide the village that lies on the shore of the island would make a fine getaway for some relaxation.  Once they arrive in on the island, they discover that all the adults are gone, and all that remains are the children, children with creepy gazes, children that have inexplicably been possessed by some, evil force.

Through the course of the film, and this is no spoiler for anyone who knows anything about the film, we learn the children have turned on the adults.  They have killed off every, other adult in the village.  At first, the English couple just try to survive.  Before too long, it grows into an “us or them” scenario, and the couple must make a decision.

Serrador handles the earlier moments of the film with subtety and a surreal visual style.  Before even showing shot one from the film, we are shown documentary footage of horrors that have befallen children throughout history.  It is as if Serrador is mocking us with how awful it is to do harm to a child only to have us proceed to watch a film about killer children.  

Once the story begins, though, Serrador’s intense and dreamlike style continues to shine.  The couple searches the empty streets of the small village, finding nothing but desolation and quiet.  Serrador never appears to be forcing the action.  He lets the quiet settle before the violent nature of the children becomes quite evident.  These early moments are made all the more unnerving by the innocent nature of Fiander and Ransome.  They are both incredibly likeable characters and the actors embrace this innocence in their performances.  You could never believe Fiander would do anything to hurt a child.  Likewise, you know he would do anything to keep his wife from being hurt.  And therein lies the dilemma.

‘Who Can Kill a Child?’ is not a horror film in the sense of blood and death splashed all over the screen.  There are moments of violence.  There is blood, bright and vibrant as it is with most films of this nature.  However, most of what unsettles in this film is the overshadowing sense of dread on this small village.  We know something is horribly wrong.  We know the children are not what they appear to be.  There is some, unexplaind presence within them, something that Serrador keeps locked away like an unanswerable mystery.  There seems to be some form of telikenesis between them, as their plans are never outwardly explored.  

At one point, the couple ventures deeper onto the island in an attempt to seek refuge.  They come upon a small farm where a woman and her children live.  These children are fine.  However, once the children from the village come across them, they appear to infect the good children with some sort of evil virus that only affects adolescents.  It’s a creepy moment when the evil children stare without speaking, and you realize without a word being said between them that the new children have now been turned.  It’s as if an evil switch in their brain has been flipped, and, now, all adults must suffer.

Another aspect of the film that is quite unsettling is the pregnancy angle of the female protagonist.  You know, at some point, with the apparent infection of children on the island, that her pregnancy will come into play.  The scene in which it does, though you have prepared yourself for it, is as unsettling as anything else found within the film.

Fiander’s acting in the climactic moments of the film are genuine and justified.  All the while, his innocent and likeable nature has been building up in our minds, and Fiander has no issues with running through the gamut of emotions his character must face.

Serrador’s film is a hidden gem that, until recently, was difficult to find on DVD.  In June of 2007, Dark Sky Films released the film on a Region 1 disc that includes a making-of featurette with cinematographer José Luis Alcaine, a featurette about handling child actors with director Serrador, and a still gallery.  It is an unpleasant film with dark ramifications, but it is so much more than a throwaway horror film.  The themes explored in ‘Who Can Kill a Child?’ are deep and powerful, and they make the overall narrative that much more disturbing.

Movie Melting Pot… ‘Ping Pong’ (Japan, 2002)

If I were to ask what the Top 5 best sports on the planet are, my money would probably be pretty safely bet against table tennis. On the other hand, that bet is entirely subject to who you’re asking. For years now, I’ve had a personal fascination with the sport of table tennis from a spectator’s point-of-view. Sure, I’ve played my share of the game, but I’m not any good. Then again, I do love to watch those who are talented. I even make a point not to miss table tennis in the Olympics.

‘Ping Pong’ (2002) is a Japanese film I came across in a “used store” about a year ago and was powerless against it’s magnetic draw it had on my wallet. Without hesitation, I snatched up the DVD from the shelf and upon reading the back the movie was mine. Having never seen the movie before, it was a gesture of faith that the filmmaker would do the subject justice, and that he did.

Directed by first-timer Fumihiko Sori, also known simply as SORI (Visual FX Artist and Producer of the anime ‘Appleseed’),   ‘Ping Pong’ tells the story of two friends who grew up playing table tennis together. Hoshino, aka Peco, (Yà ´suke Kubozuka) is an outgoing and obnoxious player with a questionable understanding of what good sportsmanship is, but it all comes down to a love for the game with him. Tsukimoto, aka Smile, (Arata) on the other hand, is a quiet and reserved person who plays not for the love of the game but because he has nothing better to do. These two friends continue to play through high school, but on different terms, causing some tension between them and their fellow teammates.

The heart of ‘Ping Pong’ lies in it’s character development. Peco and Smile are both very likable characters, but for vastly different reasons. For Peco, it’s a story of losing one’s self in defeat and finding a way to rekindle that fire of passion he once had for the game. For Smile, it’s a story of coping with unwelcome success and the consequences it has had on his friendship with Peco. For both of them, it’s a mutual story of discovering what it means both to be a hero and to have a hero.

‘Ping Pong’ begins as a casual, light-hearted comedy but develops slowly into a wonderful dramedy that takes the essence of ‘Rocky’ and ‘Karate Kid’ and transplants what made those films great into the world of table tennis. Peco and Smile must both contend on various levels with worthy opponents. They both go through vigorous training to take them to the next level and the significant battles that are fought at the tables are every bit as engaging and dramatic as Rocky’s fight against Ivan Drago or Daniel’s match against Johnny in ‘Karate Kid’.

An eclectic arrangement of music is used to further entice the viewer’s interest in ‘Ping Pong’ by appropriately setting the mood for many of the scenes. Visually the movie is fairly straight-forward but does slip several crafty techniques and styles just under the radar in a successful effort to enhance the visual storytelling without getting in the way.

By far, the most gratifying experience to take away from ‘Ping Pong’ is the sincere underlying message of what friendship and personal sacrifice are worth, the value of people having heroes and that the joy of those relationships only work if they are mutually embraced. The movie culminates with a shifting of outcomes between the two friends that actually makes the most sense.

‘Ping Pong’ is based on the best-selling comic book by Taiyo Matsumoto. The film won the New York Asian Film Festival that year and received critical acclaim from The New York Times, Chicago Tribune and Village Voice. The DVD was released in September 2007 as a two-disc special edition that included the following features:

  • 54-minute Making of ‘Ping Pong’ featurette
  • A 16-minute parody of the film called ‘Ting Pong’
  • A 16-minute short film called ‘How to Play Ping Pong’
  • Original Japanese Trailers
  • Television Spots
  • Director & Cast Profiles

Movie Melting Pot…’Bay of Blood’ (Italy, 1971)

bay-of-blood

***WARNING – SPOILERS AHEAD***

Do you ever have one of those movies that is on your “must-see” list for years and years, and you just never quite seem to work it out? Â  This movie might be on your Netflix queue for months, even years, on end, and you keep telling yourself, “I’m gonna bump that up to the number 1 spot.” Â  Of course, the next week ‘Tales of the Black Freighter’ comes out, and you forget all about your “long-forgotten” film.

Mario Bava’s ‘Bay of Blood’ was that film for me. Â  And, I’m sure, all of this build-up and anticipation to finally watching this film put a damper on my enjoyment of it. Â  I don’t want to give the impression that I didn’t enjoy ‘Bay of Blood.’ Â  Far from it. Â  But years and years of hearing about Bava’s most controversial motion picture puts certain ideas into one’s head that no film can, ultimately, live up to. Continue reading Movie Melting Pot…’Bay of Blood’ (Italy, 1971)

Movie Melting Pot…’This is England’ (UK, 2006)

Shane Meadows’ 2006 film ‘This is England’ is a remarkably chilling look at impoverished teenagers, a harrowing look at the filmmaker’s own country of his youth.

Set in 1983, the film is based on Meadows’ own experiences growing up in the time of the British National Front. Â  In case you don’t know what that is, it is a far-right political party in Britain that only allows whites. Â  It claimed its most amount of power during the ’70s and early ’80s. Â  

‘This is England’ tells the story of a 12-year-old boy, Shaun (Thomas Turgoose) who lives with his widowed mother. Â  His father has died in the Falkland War. Â  On his way home from school one day, Shaun runs into a group of skinheads lead by the charismatic Woody (Joseph Gilgun). Â  Woody sympathizes with Shaun, and the group quickly takes Shaun in as one of their own.

Everything seems to be going fine with the group until Combo (Stephen Graham), the former leader of the group, is released from prison. Â  Combo is sadistic, an openly racist and ethnically hateful militant who follows the ideology of white nationalism like the Bible. Â  Soon after returning to the group, Combo enforces his leadership, splitting the group in two, the non-politicals led by Woody, and the National Front-tied skinheads led by Combo . Â  For a short while, Shaun is pulled between these two, each one trying to win the boy over. Â  

Eventually, however, Shaun decides to stay with Combo. Â   Soon after, the group led by Combo begins down a deep, dark path of violence and eventually murder.

‘This is England’ is Meadows’ ode to his own childhood. Â  The filmmaker captures the harsh realities of the time and the dark background of the seemingly upbeat, early ’80s with amazing direction. Â  

It is a film that, despite its dark nature, proves itself to also serve as a rather poignant coming of age tale. Â  We see this world Shaun’s impressionable eyes. Â  We see the options he must weigh, and, although we disagree, we understand the decisions he makes. Â  Shaun is a lost child, a vulnerable boy who has lost his father and doesn’t really know his mother. Â  He needs something in his life, some kind of guidance, and the skinheads who befriend him give him exactly what he needs.

The acting in ‘This is England’ is what also makes the film so moving.   This was Turgoose’s first film, and the child, though playing an adolescent, brings a sincere maturity to the role.   A funny sidenote for Turgoose is that the child, having never acted before, had been banned from his school play for “behaving badly” and even demanded  Ã‚ £5 to show up for auditions for the film.   Needless to say, he was perfect for the part.

The real standouts, however, are Gilgun and Graham as the oppossing forces tearing the young protagonist apart. Â  Both actors bring a high level of charisma to their respective part. Â  This is more difficult for Graham whose sadistic character must be all the more charming if we are to believe he can win Shaun’s heart, but Graham pulls the role off masterfully.

Driven by its mature filmmaking, its fine acting, and even an eccentricly cool yet appropriate soundtrack, ‘This is England’ is an excellent film. Â  It is an unforgiving yet affecting look at a lost society and the dangerous men who decided to show it some attention. Â  It is a film about pride, regret, and, ultimately, the loneliness of being proven wrong. Â  This truly is England.

Movie Melting Pot… ‘District B13’ (France, 2004)

Under the direction of Pierre Morel, Liam Neeson is breaking heads and raking in the moolah with ‘Taken’. Â  So far, the actioner has brought in a whopping $122 million worldwide, $53 million of that in US grosses. Â  However, in his native land, France, the director, Morel, is known for another action flick. Â  For those of you who haven’t seen ‘District B13’, you’re missing out on one of the most fast-pace, kickass action films in recent memory.

Set in 2010, which seemed a little more futuristic when the film came out in 2004, the film follows an undercover cop (Cyris Raffaelli) and a vigilante (David Belle) must infiltrate the gang-infested ghettos of Paris. Â  They have 24 hours before a nuclear weapon is set to go off. Â  Much running, jumping, and overall badassery ensues.

If Snake Plissken listened to techno music, and was a whole helluva lot more agile, this is the kind of movie ‘Escape from New York’ would have been. Â  In fact, Morel’s film wears its influences proudly. Â  ‘Escape from New York’ is just one of many films to be referrenced here.

What ‘District B13’ is best know for, really, is its usage of parkour. Â  In fact, this is the film that introduced parkour to the world of cinema. Â  For those who do not know, parkour is an activity wherein someone moves from one point to another in quickest, most efficient way. Â  This is even if there are things in the person’s way. Â  People utilizing parkour will climb up sides of buildings, leap over walls, and never slowing down. Â  

If you saw ‘Casino Royale’, the chase scene in the beginning features parkour heavily. Â  The “damn hamster” John McClane is trying to shoot is actually Cyril Raffaelli. Â  David Belle, the star of ‘District B13’, is actually the founder of this sport. Â  90% of the action scenes in ‘District B13’ are real people doing real stunts without the usage of computer graphics or wirework.

Co-written by Luc Besson, ‘District B13’ got its release in France on November 10th, 2004. Â  It made nearly $7 million there before getting a release across the globe. Â  It got its US release on June 2, 2006. Â  It served somewhat of a counter-programming release to Universal’s ‘The Break-Up’, even though it only made $1.2 million in US box office. Â  It got its widest release of 151 screens when it opened, and it was out of theaters in 91 days.

The critical acclaim for ‘District B13’ was startling. Â  It currently has an 82% fresh rating at Rotten Tomatoes. Â  Critics referred to the film as “the most (maybe the only) fun action movie of the summer” and “both ridiculously hyperactive and a muscular feat of absolute confidence”. Â  Richard Schickel of TIME Magazine said of the film, “‘District B13’ makes everything Hollywood has lately done in the action genre look clumsy, dull and stale.”

A sequel to ‘District B13’, tentatively titled ‘District B13 Ultimatum’, began filming in August of 2008 in Belgrade, Serbia. Â  Both Raffaelli and Bell are reprising their respective roles, but Morel is not returning in the directing chair. Â  Luc Besson is still on writing/producing duties, but Patrick Alessandrin has stepped into the director’s chair.

‘District B13’ really is a film that any fan of action should check out. Â  It is a hyperkinetic film that never lets up, and, unlike ‘Taken’, it hits you right from the start. Â  There are a few moments of cheese and the film’s conclusion is predictable and hokey, but the film looks spectacular and the action involved is mind-blowing.

Movie Melting Pot… ‘The 36th Chamber of Shaolin’ (Hong Kong, 1979)

Considered by many fans, critics and historians to be among the very top of the hill when it comes to Kung Fu movies, this one clearly has had it’s influence on the entire genre. Someone less inclined towards quality martial arts movies may view this the first time and think, “hey… this movie doesn’t have all that much action!”

In this observation, the viewer would be partially accurate. There is “action” in the movie, but it depends on how you define action. In the traditional mainstream sense, the actual fighting scenes (“action”) appear near the end of the film. That’s not to say there isn’t plenty of worthy content in the rest of the film. One of the most successful elements of this movie is it’s story. No other martial arts movie has done such a fantastic job of taking the viewer into what a Shaolin monk is made of, what makes them tick, how they became the masters they are?

‘The 36th Chamber of Shaolin’ (Shao Lin san shi liu fang) stars Chia Hui Liu as San Te, a student who becomes disenfranchised with the academic life as he witnesses the oppression brought upon his family and friends by the tyrannical Manchu rule. After witnessing countless people murdered and tortured undeservedly, San Te decides he must travel to Shaolin to learn Kung Fu. His journey is long and an injury to his leg nearly kills him along the way, but he sneaks into the monk’s food cart to make it up the mountain to Shaolin. When they find him, he’s in a coma and the nurse him back to health. Reluctant at first, the monks choose to allow him to stay and live amongst them.

>>> Semi-Spoiler Warning! The remainder of this article divulges much of the plot! <<<

Continue reading Movie Melting Pot… ‘The 36th Chamber of Shaolin’ (Hong Kong, 1979)

Movie Melting Pot… ‘Born to Fight’ (Thailand, 2004)

There’s been a rise in the Thai filmmaking industry, especially in the action movie genre. The American audience got it’s first significant wide-release taste of this new era of Thai cinema with rising action star Tony Jaa and ‘Ong Bak’. This was followed by ‘The Protector’ and now a sequel to ‘Ong Bak’ is in the works. Tony Jaa is being considered by some to be the next Jackie Chan or Jet Li. However, there is more to this increase in Thai action films than just Tony Jaa.

‘Born to Fight’ was released in 2004 and, while many have never heard of it, was widely released on DVD by Dragon Dynasty in April 2007. The story follows a young agent named Deaw who leaves the force after his partner/commander is killed during a bust. Deaw joins a group of athletes on a trip to a remote rural Thai village to deliver food and supplies and visit with the children. While visiting the village, a group of rebels loyal to an imprisoned general attacks the village and sets up camp. Their plan is to hold the villagers hostage and threaten to kill them if the government does not release the general.

The fascinating thing about ‘Born to Fight’ is that the film builds an incredible human drama as the story of the massacre unfolds. The filmmakers went out of their way to build a relationship between the villagers and the audience and does so effectively, without resorting to sappy, melodramatic techniques. We truly feel touched and care about these people. The lengthy section in the middle of the film when we get an immense dose of how the villagers live, what they’re like and who they are has the feel of a documentary recording real lives during a good will visit from a group of athletes. This sets us up in a unique way to root for those who fight against the rebels.

Continue reading Movie Melting Pot… ‘Born to Fight’ (Thailand, 2004)

Movie Melting Pot…’Profondo rosso (‘Deep Red’)’ (Italy, 1975)

Early in his career, horror director Dario Argento became the man who perfected the giallo. Mario Bava is known as the father of the genre, but Argento’s films like ‘The Cat o’Nine Tails’, ‘Four Flies on Grey Velvet’, and ‘The Bird with the Crystal Plumage’ (these three making up the unofficial trilogy known as the “animal trilogy†) put his voice at the forefront of the giallos.

Just for a quick history lesson, for those who do not know about the giallos, they were a series of thrillers made in Italy throughout the ’70s that paved the way for the modern slasher film. The word “giallo† means yellow in Italian and the genre was named for the yellow-covered murder mystery novels that inspired the films. Giallos are murder mystery films that are generally known for their extreme violence, nudity, and a faceless killer who wears black gloves. In fact, the general equation to making a giallo is the three Bs: blood, boobs, and black gloves.

Getting back to the film at hand, Argento took some time away from the genre in the early to mid-’70s. After making two Italian TV dramas and a comedy, he returned to the genre with the 1975 film, ‘Profondo rosso’. The film is known as ‘Deep Red’ in the states, and general consensus states that this is the best giallo ever made. Some even claim that it is Argento’s best film, and the film has garnered a massive cult following in recent years.

The film follows an English jazz pianist (David Hemmings) living in Rome. Late one night while walking home, the pianist witnesses the brutal killing of a psychic medium (Macha Meril) in her apartment window. The pianist runs up to aid in a rescue, but he is too late. However, after the event and upon recollection, he begins to feel he saw the killer’s face somewhere in the apartment.

With the aid of a reporter (Daria Nicolodi, whom Argento would later marry) and the medium’s associate (Glauco Mauri), the pianist sets out to remember what he saw and pinpoint who the killer is. Shortly after, people around him begin dying vicious deaths.

‘Deep Red’ is the absolute best of the giallos. It is a thrilling masterpiece by one of the three unofficial Godfathers of Italian horror (Bava and Lucio Fulci are the other two). The film tells a very intricately crafted story, unlike Argento’s supernatural films like ‘Suspiria’ and ‘Inferno’. It is also a great introduction to giallos for anyone who has yet to check them out but find the genre interesting.

The film also marked the start of Argento’s long-going collaboration with the band Goblin and, in particular, Claudio Simonetti. Simonetti and Goblin would go one to score ‘Suspiria’ and ‘Dawn of the Dead’ for George Romero.

Between the subject matter, the set pieces, and Argento’s incredible camera work, ‘Deep Red’ is a film that has inspired and influenced countless filmmakers since. Particularly horror filmmakers have drawn inspiration from ‘Deep Red’. Among the most evident is a death scene the film shares with ‘Halloween II’ involving scalding water and a woman’s unfortunate face. ‘Deep Red’ was also referenced in films like ‘Terror Firmer’, ‘Cigarette Burns’, and ‘Kill Bill: Volume 1’. Fans with a quick eye will also catch a brief reference in the trailer for ‘Don’t’ that Edgar Wright directed for ‘Grindhouse’. However, the most obvious source for inspiration comes from a small scene involving a character being terrorized by a mechanical doll. The doll, creepy as hell, would later inspire the doll from the ‘Saw’ franchise.

‘Deep Red’ had two DVD releases through Starz/Anchor Bay. One was the Dario Argento Collection 3 that included ‘Deep Red’ and ‘Tenebrae’, another one of Argento’s above average giallos. The other disc only contained ‘Deep Red’, but both of those have been discontinued. In 2007, Blue Underground put the director’s cut of ‘Deep Red’ out on DVD. The DVD has not been discontinued, but it is unavailable at the moment. The film can also be found on 2005’s Chilling Classics box set that includes 50 films in total.

However you find it, you should definitely make an effort to watch this film. ‘Deep Red’ is a film that fans of the genre should make every effort at checking out. In fact, it is a staple when it comes to Italian horror and the giallos. It was Argento’s maturation when it came to filmmaking and it is still considered by many to be his best work. Even the director himself claims that ‘Deep Red’ is his favorite of his films.