We Are Movie Geeks All things movies… as noted by geeks.

March 1, 2014

WAMG Talks THE BAG MAN With CRISPIN GLOVER

1601213_404349519708675_630285635_n

THE BAG MAN, the all new crime thriller starring John Cusack, Rebecca Da Costa, Robert De Niro, and Crispin Glover opens in theaters today, and in support of the film I talked to star Crispin Glover about what attracted him to the role, his own films, and the appeal of touring to promote a film. Check it out below.

THE BAG MAN is a taut crime thriller that follows the story of JACK (John Cusack), a tough guy with chronic bad luck but human touches. Hired by DRAGNA (Robert De Niro), a legendary crime boss to complete a simple but unusual task, the plot centers around the anticipated arrival of Dragna who has summoned JACK and a host of shady characters to a remote location for unknown reasons. Over the course of a long and violently eventful night awaiting Dragna’s arrival, Jack’s path crosses that of RIVKA (Rebecca Da Costa), a stunningly beautiful woman whose life becomes physically and emotionally entangled with Jack’s. When Dragna finally arrives on the scene there are sudden and extreme consequences for all.

1554463_401712159972411_373047351_n

Not only are you an actor, but you are a writer and a director who has been touring with his your own films. What attracted you to THE BAG MAN, because you must have a lot of option?

Crispin Glover: Well, I’m glad that it seems like I have a lot of options. Sometimes it certainly feels like that, but I don’t know if I always feel like I do. It’s funny. But, I did like the dialogue for THE BAG MAN. Specifically, it was the dialogue. I thought that the dialogue was very well written, and it became apparent immediately who that character should be, and how I should look and play it. How I should sound. I’m realizing, while doing these conversations, that I actually didn’t have a huge preparation time. I knew that I wanted to have facial hair for it, and I think I had less than two weeks to grow out the facial hair. I wanted a little bit more time just for that, but we had just those two weeks… and it worked out. It looked enough like what I wanted it to look like.  For it to be proper. Of course, that wasn’t the only thing. There was the dialogue. That was important. Like I was saying, it was well written dialogue and very imperious to what was going on.

Some of the other actors  have talked about the improvisation on set. Did you do that as well, and do you prefer an environment where you are free to do so? Or, do you prefer sticking to the script?

Crispin Glover: For me – I don’t know about the other actors – I did not improvise in the traditional sense that people are thinking of with improvisation… where the actors are coming up with dialogue. I did not do that on this. I don’t think there is a single word that I say in the film that is not written in the screenplay. On occasion, there have been films where I have improvised in that kind of traditional idea, but that is pretty rare. I usually don’t. Usually I’m sticking pretty close to what’s written. I would say out of… I’m forgetting how many films that I have been in. I look at the IMDB sometimes to remind myself. I would say, if I had to – I’ve been in – I don’t know. Including television for me from when I was a teenager, I think I have somewhere between 50 and 60 credits. [IMDB credits 61] I can’t remember what it is now. Out of those, I would say there’s only 2 or 3 where I’ve really improvised dialogue. I usually don’t. I’m very comfortable with it if it comes to it. The way I studied acting , from age 15 to 20, many of my classes were improvisation with technique as opposed to improvisation with comedy. So, I have no problem with it. Also, a part of my training was scene study. Generally you are taught to say the lines, and if you stick with that there is an improvisational element within the thought process , underneath the lines, which is ultimately the most important aspect. What did happen in the scenes that I shot – not all of them, but certain scenes – we did a fair amount of takes, and interpretations of how to play those lines where we would just, kind of, keep going, and do multiple runs of a scene. But, we would stop and talk about it too. It was interesting. I enjoyed it. That’s not always that common to do, and I did enjoy that aspect. I wouldn’t call that improvisation in the way that it’s standardly used. We were sticking with the lines, but playing with the interpretation of how to play it. You can have different intentions in what you are getting at while saying the same dialogue. There was one scene in particular where we were kind of going through it, and then came to the realization that  – because the way that the dialogue was written, you could interpret it multiple ways as to what someone is thinking about, and that can give a very different feeling as to how you are saying the same dialogue but it means something quite different from what you – by playing it with one intention, with a different thought process behind it.

This is David Grovic’s first feature film, but he has a few acting credits under his belt. Do you find it beneficial to work with directors who have acted before?

Crispin Glover: I did not know that he came from a  background of acting. I realized when I saw him – he’s in the film. What I do know is that he funded the film. I don’t know if I’m supposed to say that or not [laughs]. I don’t know exactly what his business is, but he self financed the film, which actually, for me, that’s something that I was interested in because I do that as well. He’s financially independent. I’m not. I have to work in what my chosen profession is, which is acting, which is fine. I’m glad to do it. It is interesting to me when somebody is an autocrat. When you fund your film you can be limited by monetary decisions, but you can go into areas of what you want to do. I like that. I like when a director isn’t beholden to someone who is essentially the entity that it funding the film and has the final say of what the content is. When somebody funds the film themselves, they are the final say for the content, and I do like that better. I think, ultimately, it’s a much more individualized thought process… rather than when someone has to worry about, particularly, what a corporation wants the content to be. My own films, like my first film WHAT IS IT? specifically is a reaction to that. I tour with two different live shows, and two different feature films . People can find out where I’m going to be, with what chosen film by logging on to CrispinGlover.com.

But David was – it was apparent that he understood enough, certainly about acting, to let thought process be open, and that’s incredibly important. I’ve worked with writer/director’s that – first time writer/director’s – that make the mistake of getting into the word, and feeling like the word is the final element when it’s not. It’s what is under the word. That’s what is important. I’m sure David knew that. It was apparent. The fact that he is involved as a performer means that he has to be able to relate to that, and he certainly – obviously he understood working with good actors. He hired Robert De Niro, so [laughs] he has to understand something about that, for sure… and he did. When I read the screenplay though, Robert De Niro was not attached to it. I didn’t know about that. I did like the dialogue enough. That was what struck me about it.

You’ve been touring for some time now with your two films.  What is the most rewarding part about doing the old-school theater tours, and getting to interact with the audience?

Crispin Glover: It’s complicated, because… What I call it is vaudeville distribution, because a lot of the venues that I’m at are part of what were the vaudeville circuit, and these are 35mm movie houses that, for the most part, don’t entertain as much live performance as maybe they have cinemas. I’m quite convinced that – and I’m already seeing signs of it since I’ve been doing this these past 9 years – is that it’s going to become more popular. I think you’re going to see a lot of filmmakers that are going to start touring with their films. There are a few reasons. There’s a strong business incentive to do it. On top of that, the audience interaction is a real thing. What people get out of that interaction is extremely valuable. A lot of these studios keep coming up with ideas of “what can people not get at home” when it comes to 3D, or what have you. Ultimately, anything that you can put out digitally… people are going to be able to get at home, except for living, breathing humans interacting with them. You cannot replace that. Vaudeville once was the form of entertainment in the United States for more than 100 years, and live performance is still maintained. I strongly feel that this aspect will remain, and probably increase once people realize that interaction with humans… humans are social animals. They learn, and think, because they are interacting with other human beings. That is not to be underestimated.

You are currently working on new project, and I’ve heard that you have shown about 10 minutes of it. Can you tell us a little bit about it?

Crispin Glover: Yeah. In parts 1 and part 2 of what will be a trilogy, and I think that I already said that people can find out where I am going to be by going on to CrispinGlover.combut part 3 … I’m not shooting that right now. Sometimes I see it written that part 3 of the trilogy is , but it’s not. This is a separate feature film that I’ve been developing for a number of years. I’m shooting it at my property in the Czech Republic. This is a film that I’ve been developing for my father and myself to act in together. He and I have been in 2 films together, but we’ve never had a scene together. We’ve never acted together. This is the first time he and I have acted together, so I’m excited about it. I’ve complicated it by purposely not putting the title out. There’s so much misinformation that goes into it… like on IMDB. Already I’ve seen so many incorrect things. There is 20 minutes of edited which are contiguous that I am showing at the shows, and I still have quite a lot more to shoot. This is a project that I am in the midst of, and it’s hard to calculate how long these things will take when you fund your own films and on a limit budget. It takes time, but I’m very excited about it, and I’m looking forward to seeing people at the shows, and showing them this new footage as well as the two feature films that I’ve been touring with for this long amount of time. They’re solid underpinnings, and there’s a lot to talk about. I’m glad to say that it’s still going, amazingly, after 9 years of touring. There’s still stuff to talk about.

1005854_386591588151135_1694651793_n

THE BAG MAN was co-written by David Grovic and Paul Conway, and is David Grovic’s directorial debut. The film has a running time of 108 minutes and is not rated by the MPAA.

FOR MORE INFO:
Follow @TheBagManMovie on Twitter / #TheBagMan
Like THE BAG MAN on Facebook
Follow TheBagManMovie on Instagram

THE BAG MAN is in theaters now

hr_The_Bag_Man_1

February 28, 2014

WAMG Talks THE PRETTY ONE With Jenée LaMarque And Zoe Kazan

ThePrettyOne_Laurel and Audrey

The all new comedy/drama THE PRETTY ONE is in theaters now, and in support of the movie I sat down with director Jenée LaMarque and star Zoe Kazan in a small round table discussion to talk about twins, the origin of the story, and the challenge of playing two different people who have similarities. Since I am an identical twin, I was curious about the research it took for Zoe to play both twins in a rather convincing way. Check it out below.

Written and directed by Jenée LaMarque, THE PRETTY ONE is a coming of age comedy about identity and loss and a wallflower who finally learns how to break out of her shell. In a balancing act of a performance, Zoe Kazan portrays twins Laurel and Audrey, most poignantly as a relationship blooms with her new neighbor (Jake Johnson). As Laurel begins to slip into the life she has always wanted but never thought was possible, she must decide between continuing her life as Audrey and revealing herself as the perfect fraud.

ThePrettyOne_ZoeKazan-JakeJohnson_Pool

Melissa from WAMG: To start out, I guess I should say that I am an identical twin…

Jenée LaMarque: Wow!

Zoe Kazan: We have an expert in the house.

Melissa from WAMG: There were certain nuances that I found between the girls which I found relatable. For example, in the car scene where Audrey is angry with Laurel for getting the same haircut… I can relate to the desire to set yourself apart from your identical twin. I’m curious, how much research did you do when looking into the relationships of identical twins?

Jenée LaMarque: There were two parts to that. One was researching twins who have lost their twin, and what their experience had been in that process. There was a book that I had given to Zoe about first hand accounts about twins that had lost their twin at birth, or during childhood, or later in life, or when they were very old, and what their process was. So, there was that, and then there was also this great series of videos by – I’m sure you would love this – Candice Breitz. She’s a South African artist. What she did was she took identical twins and she interviewed them in the same location, in the same clothing, and asked them the same questions…

Zoe Kazan: … but separately.

Jenée LaMarque: … but separately.

Melissa from WAMG: Really?

Jenée LaMarque: Yeah, and then she spliced it together. It gives me goosebumps just thinking about it, because it was just really informative about how they form their identities based on the way that people would label them…

Melissa from WAMG: Absolutely.

Jenée LaMarque: … and in their lives, how they have to struggle against that. People would make these physical assessments of them to their face because they are searching for the differences between them so that they could differentiate between them. So yeah, we watched those. You should watch those and share them with your twin.

Zoe Kazan: They are really beautiful. They’re interesting to me because I have a sister that I am really close with, so there was a lot that I thought that I could instinctionally understand because there is this sibling that I am so close to, but there was this ocean of stuff that I thought was completely different. I was trying to come to that from an empathic place. You know, I was trying to understand what it’s like to grow up with someone that people would make assumptions about, and be looked at a certain way that I needed to understand before taking that leap.

ThePrettyOne_Zoe Kazan

Q: Did you have many rehearsals?

Jenée LaMarque: We did. The beginning of rehearsal was just us meeting. Six months before we started shooting we started meeting, and she’s like “Let’s go through the script like I’m a six-year-old”. We went through every single sentence and every single line to make sure we understood the intention and were on the same page. We were very much on the same page with that. Then we had rehearsals with other actors for about a week. Mostly surrounding her relationships with each of the other characters in the movie – including the body double that she ended up acting against in the scenes where she was playing both characters.

Melissa from WAMG: What made you decide to tell this story? What is the origin of THE PRETTY ONE?

Jenée LaMarque: Well, it was a confluent of several things. One was the loss of my best friend in my early 20’s. He died the week that we graduated college. You know, that’s a very unsure time in someone’s life. They just graduated. They don’t know what they are going to do with their life. It’s unsure, and then on top of that there was this great loss, and I, sort of, came of age through that loss in my 20’s – through the lens of that loss. He was a really funny guy – a hilarious person. He had cystic fibrosis, and so, the whole time I knew him he was dying essentially, but he had the most amazing sense of humor, and was dark, and morbid. So, I wanted to tell a story about the loss of someone close, and to me, this is the extreme of that circumstance. Losing your identical twin. Someone that you have been with since inception. But the story is essentially a coming of age story. Coming of age and learning to value yourself through loss. It sort of came though a very personal experience, even though it’s not directly autobiographical because that didn’t happen to me, but it’s true to my experiences as a young woman. That’s sort of the genesis of it. And I wanted it to be comedic. I wanted it to be a comedy because that’s just my sense of humor, and the way I sort of look at the world.

ThePrettyOne_JeneeLamarque

Q: Can you talk about casting a little bit, and what you found in Zoe?

Jenée LaMarque: Yeah. I think in that lead role, for me, it was important for that person to audition. It was such a tall order for a performer that I felt like, for my first film, I needed to have that insurance that they could, indeed, do it. It took about six months to cast the role, and I met with a lot of really wonderful actresses that auditioned, and it just never felt right. We were getting closer to when we wanted to start shooting, and we knew we needed to make a choice, but we were bummed out because we knew that we hadn’t met the right person. Then Zoe was in New York, but happened to be in LA for the week. I was really excited when they said that she was coming in because I had seen her work before. As soon as she walked in, that feeling of “your character is in the room with you” washed over – that intuition of “Oh, here she is!”. The thing that seemed so hard to cast was actually very easy. It wasn’t like we were just mulling it over between two people. It was “We need her and we will do everything that we can to get her!”. She just really nailed the tone, and brought – she’s a very gifted physical comedian. I knew, right away, when she came in.

Q: Zoe, what was your impression of the screenplay when you read it?

Zoe Kazan: I thought that it was unlike anything that I had read, which says a lot because we [as actors] read a lot of scripts. Sometimes people don’t write from their true voice. They are writing to get their script sold, or their movie made. They have an idea of what they think might be successful. I felt like this was Jenée’s real voice. I felt like I was meeting her by reading it on the page. I was very curious about who the person was that had written this. I didn’t feel like it unfolded for me in the first read, which was also a great feeling. Sometimes when you read something you think “Oh, I could act this tomorrow!”. That kind of project is more challenging because you can get bored with it really easily. The idea of reading something and going “I don’t know how I would do this” was really intriguing to me, and exciting.

ThePrettyOne_ZoeKazan_Bench

Melissa from WAMG: What was the biggest challenge of playing two different people with similar personality traits? How did you balance the two characters?

Zoe Kazan: It’s interesting to me that you think that they have similar personality traits. I also think so, but I think that they are handling it in different ways. I think that Audrey has buried Laurel inside of herself. When we first meet her, she has taken all of the parts of herself that are awkward, or self evasive, or self loathing, and she has buried those deeply inside of herself. But, she’s not a perfect person, and she is having a lot of difficulty in her own life which we kind of fleshed out as we talked about it to give me a really strong sense of who she was, because you learn more about her over the course of the movie, but when we first meet her we see her through Laurel’s eyes. I think that Laurel is someone who has a lot of Audrey’s vivacity, and life-force, and confidence somewhere in herself, but it’s trapped underneath all of these layers of the roles that she has put herself in, and that her family has put her in – the way that she sees herself, and the way that the world has reinforced that sort of label. Unfortunately, I think that Audrey dies before she becomes a whole person, but then Laurel has this big journey where the parts of her that, I think, are like her sister get to come out. Allowing those parts to come out, she breaks free of this load that she’s carrying around. I think that the best way to approach that, for me, was to do so really technically. We talked about very basic physical differences between them, about the way that psychology has affected their bodies, how they carry themselves in the world… which is also what I saw in those videos that we mentioned earlier. Even though these were two people that were physically identical, they didn’t look physically identical to me because of the way that their personality came through… which is really interesting because that is, kind of, how I think about acting. It’s the same vessel every time. It’s you. It’s your body. It’s your emotions, but you’re putting it though this sieve, this different part that reshapes you. I think that I look very different from part to part based on what that part is, and what it requires. It’s not just hair and makeup. It’s also that characters spirit. It changes the way you look, and the way you look to the camera. I think I thought about it more as constructing these two separate people rather than trying to think of them as always in comparison with each other.

ThePrettyOne_On set

 

FOR MORE INFO VISIT : http://theprettyonemovie.com

THE PRETTY ONE is in theaters now

ThePrettyOne_OneSheet_small

February 26, 2014

WAMG Talks THE ART OF THE STEAL With Kurt Russell

Filed under: Featured Articles,General News — Tags: , — Melissa Howland @ 4:07 pm

AOTS_5

THE ART OF THE STEAL hits theaters on March 14th, but since it’s available now On-Demand, WAMG and several other members of the press sat down with the one and only Kurt Russell to talk about his new project, heist movies, and his wine making. Check it out below.

Crunch Calhoun (Kurt Russell), a third-rate motorcycle daredevil and semi-reformed art thief, agrees to get back into the con game and pull off one final lucrative art theft with his untrustworthy brother, Nicky (Matt Dillon). Reassembling the old team, Crunch comes up with a plan to steal a priceless historical book, but the successful heist leads to another far riskier plan devised by Nicky. They fail to realize each other’s separate agendas when their plan goes awry in this con movie about honor, revenge and the bonds of brotherhood.

AOTS_6

What was the appeal to you to join this project?

Kurt Russell: I thought it was clever and by clever I mean, it took what I felt was a conman then art slash art heist and combined all of them with a sting movie. To have a sting movie, you have to have an audience involved. I love it when the writer has the acumen to put together a screenplay that gives him the feeling that he’s earned the right to almost start the movie and point the finger at the audience and say “Alight, so you’ve gotten jerked back and forth a few times and you can’t say that it’s been done dishonestly but you’ve got three seconds to answer, who’s doing what to who? You’ve got to come up with an answer.” I think that those movies are very rare. It puts the intelligence of the writer/director on display. When people talk about taking risks and making movies, I often chuckle to myself and say “That was a real big risk, pays you fifteen million dollars, what a big risk.” What’s risky is when you put your brains on display. When you’re laying yourself out there as a writer/director to be criticized for how smart you are. I’ve read a lot of scripts over 52 years and this was clever. Now, the question is then, how do you pull that off and who’s the guy to pull that off. When it’s the same guy who wrote it, you often run into a lot of problems. They’re generally the first person to bail out on themselves and I’ve seen that a number of times. It’s shocking when you see it, see the very guy who wrote it bail off of his stuff because he just doesn’t know how to do it instead of saying “Look, here’s what I’m trying to do. Can somebody here help me do that?” and you go “Yeah, I can.” I just want to know exactly what it is you’re trying to do. What was great about working with him was he put together a group of people that almost to a man or woman said “I get what this is, you might have to put me on track every once in a while, you’re always gonna be the one who says that’s not quite it.” You’re always gonna be the captain of the ship. As long as you have that person who’s not afraid to make those decisions and take responsibility for that then you’re free to say “How far do we want to go in this scene?”  I can do this or I can do this or I can do this. And you keep taking this little chess piece and move it all along the board and move it to the end and say “That still works.” That’s a good one. It sounds simple but it’s pretty complex when you’re doing movies that are out of sequence because of the way you have to shoot it and you’ve got actors working on different days who aren’t there to double-check and you’ve got to remember to tell him that you’ve done this instead of that. So a lot is put on his plate and I think it’s our job as actors to do as much as we can to clean the plate but put all the best ingredients on it for him to choose from.

There’s a moment with you and Matt Dillon where he steals from a little girl and you yell at him about a robber’s code. Is there a code you operate by in your job?

Kurt Russell: Yeah, I’m sure there is. I don’t know if I could put my finger on it to make it interesting for you but there are some codes. My code is very simple and goes back to what my dad said to me. One of the early jobs I got, I was maybe ten years old and my dad, it was one of the only things he said to me about acting, “Ok, you’re getting paid a man’s salary, do a man’s job.” That was it. [The director] and I really do like each other. I know that it’s fun to work with people always but it’s a different thing to appreciate them for what they’re trying to do. Let’s face it, if this was your fifth movie, this movie would be different, better in many ways and probably in a raw way, not quite have an energy that you always want to keep in your movies. It’s always a fun thing to imagine getting better but keeping that raw energy that comes with youth and ignorance and exuberance and not being afraid. But I do appreciate John and appreciated his screenplay and what he was doing. I thought it was impressive that he was laying himself out there and saying “I think this is funny and kind of sharp, what do you think?” To me, it’s the kind of thing that you don’t often get to do. It’s generally not about that. It’s generally about having something to say and having a tale to tell. This is not that. This is just being in the world of movies that I just think, I just love going to the movies and finding out I’m in one of those. There’s been quite a few of those lately. Take Dirty Rotten Scoundrels. It’s got conmen in it. It’s not an art heist movie but it’s definitely a sting movie because the audience is involved and you have to say “Didn’t see her coming” and it’s kind of fun.

AOTS_8

Where there any heist movies you were thinking about while making the movie? Or any that just appeal to you and are some of your favorites?

Kurt Russell: I’m not a cinephile. He’s [Jonathan Sobol] more knowledgable there than I am. We did have conversations about different things. What’s interesting to me about the point of view of making them is I made another movie and when you’re making the movie and when you see the end result, it’s nothing exactly like when you’re making it. It’s what you hope you might see. Because I know when we made Vanilla Eye, I had similar conversations that I had with you I had with Cameron and Tom. I said “Now guys, I’m just confused about something here. If you got Kurt Russell and he’s telling Tom “Don’t jump” don’t we want the audience to agree with Kurt “Don’t jump”?” You get down to funny stuff like that but at the end of the day, Tom kind of looked at me, and it was this two-hour conversation, and Tom looked like “I’m not sure” and Cameron was like “If he’s right, we’re sunk.” Those conversations you do have because it’ll turn on a dime. If you don’t get the fullest out of it, you don’t really get the most out of the thing. But if you violate, then the audience never forgives you in these kind of movies. So you’re on your toes. In your defense, you’re dealing with 12 people coming to you for slight changes on the outside, right away, that is better. That happens constantly. You’re dealing with 10 to 15 of those a day. You start adding those up and once or twice or three times, you’re not going to quickly add those numbers and come up with the right number. Look what happens here if you do that. That kind of thing is almost easier, I get fascinated by that. It’s not easier to hold onto it because that’s where you’re living and you’re living way deeper inside of it than I am but it is something that fascinates me in terms of looking at everything that people do, getting the most out of it, and saying “Were ok, aren’t we?” I’m not looking at the camera saying that, I’m looking at her saying that. It’s fine. I just always liked the idea of, and I’m not gonna say what the movie is, but I love the stuff that takes place at the end where it’s my favorite kind of thing of a movie where you’re onboard and all these things are wrapping up. The end of this one is like a guy at a shooting range with his girlfriend and he’s going “BOOM. Down. BOOM. Down. BOOM. Down. BOOM. Down.” And my brain is going “That’s great! Here’s the Teddy Bear.” I love the progression where it goes down. Especially when you think it’s down and things start happening rather quickly. It’s this slow foreplay of what’s taking place earlier and then this climax is coming at you fast and furious and nothing can stop it now because it’s been taken care of, it’s been done.

What I like about this film is the characters are so surprising, she trusts you guys and…

Kurt Russell: Well yeah, all I’ll say is my favorite relationship in the movie is Lola and Crush. One of my favorite movies in terms of writer just knowing  more than the audience does instantaneously Bound. Why does Bound work? What’s the last thing she says in Bound? “What’s the difference between you and me?” and she says “I don’t know” “I don’t know either.” Those two girls are in love and the audience, that writer knew that the audience would just make the assumption no matter what. The love story would be between a man and a woman, no matter what. That’s just a given. Wrong answer. That’s why that works. What I love about how it is with Lola here is, and I’m just talking about it without blowing the movie and hopefully people see the movie but the assumption is that he’s an old guy that she’s taking advantage of. It’s just a given. We all just go in thinking that. It’s just done for you. That assumption is what makes that work. Without that assumption, there’s no game to play. That’s on a filmic level. When I read this thing, I said I want to meet this guy because he understands things. He understands things that the audience are walking in with. They’re walking in with their baggage. It’s great and it’s really fun to play with. So that’s the kind of thing that you’re literally spending millions of dollars and hopefully coming up with something great based ultimately at the end of the day is based on that understanding, that relationship is a real one.

What was it like working with Matt?

Kurt Russell: I just thought he was such a good choice and the way he embraces that stuff. There’s very few actors who know how to do that. He’s just really good at it. He’s an interesting actor to work with in general. Kate, my daughter, worked with him and said “You’re gonna like working with Matt, he’s an interesting actor.” And I did. I was just impressed with the way he, I don’t know if I can understand those characters as well as an actor like Matt. There’s something he’s able to actually grab onto there that I wouldn’t know how to find. It’s like a load off your mind. When you’re reading something, you have a tendency to play every role because you’re trying to understand every character and then you walk in the room on the day and you realize, first of all, oh thank god I don’t have to know everyone’s lines, that’s a load off, and then you realize you don’t have to do anything but watch everybody. I just think Matt was perfect casting for this character. I think he did a perfect job.

AOTS_3

Looking back, what role do you regret turning down the most?

Kurt Russell: You turn them down for different reasons. You regret that the reason existed, I suppose. To be honest with you, part of my problem in the business is I don’t hold onto that stuff for very long. I’ll have an answer for you in about three hours. I’ll be driving along or taking a nap and “Oh!” From my life, there’s been probably ten of those and I’d go see the movie. Now there are things that I didn’t do that I wanted to do and I don’t feel this way about but inevitably I go see those movies and I came out thinking that they were better for the person that was in it than I would have been. You know what I mean? I wouldn’t have been doing that movie. I didn’t see that movie so they were inevitable right.

Do you have any good Valentine’s Day stories?

Kurt Russell: Valentine’s Day is my actual anniversary and so I have a big day planned. I’m gonna go to this place called the 1880 Union Hotel in a little tiny town called Los Alamos where I’m opening up a wine saloon. We’re opening up the wine saloon section of that hotel. I’m taking Goldie and they’re having a big dinner there, an eight course meal, and part of the meal is beef from my ranch and my wines. I’m really heavily into my wines now. I love making wines. I love making pinots and chardonnay and we have this great place now to showcase our wines. I’m getting more and more into wine. I really, really like it.

How many years for your anniversary?

Kurt Russell: 31.

Like THE ART OF THE STEAL on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/theartofthesteal

THE ART OF THE STEAL is available on Video-On-Demand now. The film opens in theaters on March 14

AOTS_Radius_key_art

February 11, 2014

WAMG Talks To Skylar Astin, Camilla Belle, Chad Michael Murray And Herschel Faber About CAVEMEN

Cavemen_keyart copy

CAVEMEN is a romantic comedy about how – with a little help from our friends – true love isn’t as evasive as it seems. During a recent press day for the film, I spoke with stars Skylar Astin, Camilla Belle, Chad Michael Murray and director Herschel Faber about filming a love story in LA… and just who has the sweetest dance moves out of the bunch. Check it out below.

Cavemen follows LA playboy Dean (Skylar Astin) who is fed up with one-night-stands and empty relationships and realizes that he wants something more out of life than just a party. With a little inspiration from his nine-year-old nephew and his best friend Tess (Camilla Belle), Dean decides to try his hand at finding true love for the first time – which proves to be much more difficult than he thought in modern-day Los Angeles.

8 - camilla skylar

CAVEMEN is written and directed by Herschel Faber, and stars Skylar Astin (Pitch Perfect), Camilla Belle (10,000 B.C.), Alexis Knapp (Pitch Perfect), and Chad Michael Murray (One Tree Hill). Produced by Herschel Faber, Joe Fogel, and Cole Payne with co-production by Jeremy Loethen and Jamieson Stern. Executive produced by Kurt David Anderson, John Michaels, Reza Mirroknian, Mary Weldon, and John Wynn. With cinematography by Nic Sadler, music by Ronen Landa, and film editing by Robert Schafer.

5 - blond kenny skylar chad

FOR MORE INFO:

FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/CavemenTheMovie

CAVEMEN is in Theaters and on VOD now

Cavemen_keyart

February 6, 2014

WAMG At The VAMPIRE ACADEMY Red Carpet Premiere

IMG_4713

On Tuesday, the vampires came out for the VAMPIRE ACADEMY premiere at Regal Cinemas L.A. LIVE Stadium 14 in downtown Los Angeles. Members of the cast including Sarah Hyland, Zoey Deutch, Olga Kurylenko, Lucy Fry, Sami Gayle, Dominic Sherwood, Cameron Monaghan, Joely Richardson, Danila Kozlovsky, Ashley Charles, Ben Peel, director Mark Waters and writer Daniel Waters greeted fans before walking the red carpet in celebration of the films premiere. Lea Thompson (mother of Zoey Deutch), Madelyn Deutch, Bella Thorne, Debby Ryan and other guests also joined in the fun. Check it out below.

(All photos taken and are the property of Melissa Howland)

IMG_4675

IMG_4599

IMG_4569

IMG_4548

IMG_4734

IMG_4670

IMG_4530

IMG_4705

IMG_4704

Based on author Richelle Mead’s worldwide bestselling series, VAMPIRE ACADEMY tells the legend of Rose Hathaway (Zoey Deutch) and Lissa Dragomir (Lucy Fry), two 17-year-old girls who attend a hidden boarding school for Moroi (mortal, peaceful Vampires) and Dhampirs (half-vampire/half-human guardians). Rose, a rebellious Guardian-in-training and her best friend, Lissa – a royal vampire Princess – have been on the run when they are captured and returned to St.Vladamirs Academy, the very place where they believe their lives may be in most jeopardy. Thrust back into the perils of Moroi Society and high school, Lissa struggles to reclaim her status while Rose trains with her mentor and love-interest, Dimitri (Danila Kozlovsky), to guarantee her place as Lissa’s guardian. Rose will sacrifice everything to protect Lissa from those who intend to exploit her from within the Academy walls and the Strigoi (immortal, evil vampires) who hunt her kind from outside its sanctuary.

CLICK ON THE THUMBNAILS BELOW TO ENLARGE:

IMG_4548 IMG_4546 IMG_4545 IMG_4739 IMG_4738 IMG_4737 IMG_4734 IMG_4733 IMG_4732 IMG_4730 IMG_4729 IMG_4728 IMG_4726 IMG_4723 IMG_4722 IMG_4719 IMG_4718 IMG_4716 IMG_4715 IMG_4713 IMG_4712 IMG_4710 IMG_4709 IMG_4708 IMG_4707 IMG_4706 IMG_4705 IMG_4704 IMG_4703 IMG_4701 IMG_4700 IMG_4698 IMG_4697 IMG_4696 IMG_4695 IMG_4694 IMG_4692 IMG_4691 IMG_4688 IMG_4687 IMG_4685 IMG_4684 IMG_4683 IMG_4681 IMG_4678 IMG_4677 IMG_4675 IMG_4674 IMG_4673 IMG_4671 IMG_4670 IMG_4668 IMG_4667 IMG_4666 IMG_4665 IMG_4664 IMG_4661 IMG_4660 IMG_4659 IMG_4658 IMG_4657 IMG_4655 IMG_4654 IMG_4653 IMG_4652 IMG_4651 IMG_4647 IMG_4646 IMG_4644 IMG_4641 IMG_4640 IMG_4639 IMG_4637 IMG_4636 IMG_4635 IMG_4631 IMG_4630 IMG_4629 IMG_4625 IMG_4624 IMG_4621 IMG_4617 IMG_4615 IMG_4612 IMG_4611 IMG_4609 IMG_4605 IMG_4604 IMG_4602 IMG_4601 IMG_4600 IMG_4599 IMG_4595 IMG_4593 IMG_4591 IMG_4587 IMG_4586 IMG_4584 IMG_4583 IMG_4579 IMG_4575 IMG_4572 IMG_4570 IMG_4569 IMG_4568 IMG_4566 IMG_4562 IMG_4561 IMG_4560 IMG_4558 IMG_4556 IMG_4552 IMG_4551 IMG_4753 IMG_4751 IMG_4749 IMG_4746 IMG_4744 IMG_4743

FOR MORE INFO:

Website: http://va-movie.com/
FACEBOOK: VampireAcademyMovie
Twitter: @VAOFFICIALMOVIE
Official Hashtag: #VAMOVIE

 VAMPIRE ACADEMY hits theaters February 7

vampire_academy_poster1

February 5, 2014

WAMG At THE MONUMENTS MEN Press Day

hr_The_Monuments_Men_6-2

THE MONUMENTS MEN, an all new action drama directed by George Clooney is about to hit theaters. Recently, WAMG attended THE MONUMENTS MEN press day where George Clooney, Matt Damon, Bill Murray, John Goodman, Jean Dujardin, Bob Balaban, Hugh Bonneville, Cate Blanchett and co-writer Grant Heslov sat down with press to talk about the film… as well as a prank that George Clooney played on Matt Damon. Check it out below.

Based on the true story of the greatest treasure hunt in history, THE MONUMENTS MEN is an action drama focusing on an unlikely World War II platoon, tasked by FDR with going into Germany to rescue artistic masterpieces from Nazi thieves and returning them to their rightful owners. It would be an impossible mission : with the art trapped behind enemy lines, and wight the German army under orders to destroy everything as the Reich fell, how could these guys – seven museum directors, curators, and art historians, all more familiar with Michelangelo than the M-1 – possibly hope to succeed? But as the Monuments Men, as they were called, found themselves in a race against time to avoid the destruction of 1000 years of culture, they would risk their lives to protect and defend mankind’s greatest achievements.

The-Monuments-Men-1

The movie deals with a heavy subject matter, but it does so in a light, fun, whimsical way but it’s quite heavy. Was there any desire in the beginning to make this story appropriate for a broader age audience?

George Clooney: Yes. We wanted to make an entertaining film. We like the story, we’re not all that familiar with the actual story, which is rare for a World War II film. Usually you think you know all the stories, and we wanted it to be accessible. We liked, and I like sort of those John Sturgees films. We thought it was sort of a mix of Kelly’s Heroes and The Train. We wanted to talk about a very serious subject that’s ongoing still and we also wanted to make it entertaining. That was the goal.

I was wondering if you could talk about what drew you to this role, what appealed to you about playing this character and how it was for you to be a part of this production.

Bill Murray: Well George told me the story that he was going to do about a year before, and I thought gosh, that really sounds like fun. I wasn’t invited to be in the movie the year before, and I just thought that would be really great. Suddenly, about a year later, he asked if I wanted to be in this film. I thought about it for a whole year. So I said yes and the story is so fascinating, and as they say untold, most people don’t know this story, and to do it with this group of people was not just ennoble, because everyone’s so good, everyone is such a good actor, but they’re so much fun. I watched the movie for the first time last night, and a number of occasions I went oh yea, we got this shot, and then we sat down and we laughed for about 40 minutes after that. Oh yea, we stopped there and then we started cracking wise and laughed for about 40 minutes right there. It was like that. George and Grant take great care of everyone on the job. I’ve never been so well taken care of on the job. I’ve never felt so protected and covered and all of us as actors, everyone had great scenes to do. Everyone had a chance to have a turn to do a wonderful piece of work. Everyone had great scenes and we got to see a wonderful story unfold. We got to go to great places. We got to eat well, we laughed a lot and I think we’d all do it again tomorrow if we had to start again tomorrow.

the-monuments-men-matt-damon-george-clooney

What is the difference now between George Clooney as a director on Confessions of a Dangerous Mind and you directing now? 

George Clooney: Well, George Clooney has learned to speak about himself in the third person. The timing for directing is usually because it takes about that long to develop a piece and then do pre-production and then post-production. It usually takes about a couple of years. I preferred directing to doing other things. Directing and writing I think, they seem to be infinitely more creative. As far as how I’ve changed, all you’re trying to do is learn from people that you’ve worked with. I’ve worked with the Coen brothers and [Steven] Soderbergh, Alexander Payne. I’ve worked with really great directors over the years and you just try to see what they’re doing and just steal it. That’s the theory. Oh I like that, I’m going to do it that way. The truth is, your development you hope is the same way as everything, which is you succeed some, you fail some and you keep slugging away at it. I really enjoy it, it’s fun and I like it more than acting now. It’s tricky directing yourself, obviously, but…

Matt Damon: But since you’re speaking to yourself in the third person…

George Clooney: I go George, you’re really good! George Clooney. So anyways, I enjoy directing and I don’t know whether it’s improving or not but it’s certainly evolving in different directions.

To George [Clooney] and Cate [Blanchett], the two of you have had great years. Do you have some sort of confidence going into a project like this, or do you still contain some self-doubt?

Cate Blanchett: Look, projects like this don’t come along very often with ensembles like this. For me, the power of the story is it shines a light and a perspective on what we thought were previously well-known facts. There’s a shot in the film, my children saw it last night even though they’re clearly not the demographic, but even when they find the barrel full of wedding rings and gold fillings, we’ve seen those horrendous pictures, and the power of cinema is that it draws on that collective history. I feel like the film harnesses our understanding of the second World War, but yet opens a door into a very particular and noble and quirky bunch of guys and girl who really changed where we are now and what we understand our contemporary culture to be. Am I confident? Never. I should have just said yes. Yes.

George Clooney: I have no doubts.

243ff0e1637b401624ac8d124bc3927b

Can you tell us about the process of casting and scenes like the Christmas scene, everybody is great, can you explain to us how you worked with scenes like that?

George Clooney: The Christmas scene we wrote specifically knowing we were going to use that specific piece of music. A good friend of mine, his daughter, his 16-year-old daughter is just an insanely talented singer. I had her record that at her school, she recorded that song, and we just used it. It’s spectacular. She’s a real talent. But we knew all along that we wanted to overlap and tell a little bit of a nonlinear piece of storytelling. Casting was fun. We couldn’t get Brad so we got Matt. [laughs] It was really fun. I think, pretty much, Grant [Heslov] and I, when we sat down and we were writing it, we hadn’t thought of Bob yet and we went to a party, an Argo party and we saw Bob and we had this part and we knew that we wanted Bill [Murray] in it and we kept thinking who are we going to put opposite Bill that Bill can give a really hard time to? And then there was this party with Bob, and I looked over and I was like oh, it’s perfect. And so we called Bob up the next day, but the rest of the gang, we wrote it with them in mind so it helps a little bit when you’re writing. Don’t you think it makes a big difference?

Bob Balaban: Oh it’s terrible. Now I have to go to all parities now. I can’t stay home anymore.

Were there any pranks that happened on set?

Matt Damon: I read somewhere that he took some of my wardrobe and kept shrinking it about an 8th of an inch every other day.

George Clooney: Every other day I had the wardrobe department…

Matt Damon: I think he did that because he knew I was trying to lose weight. So this was a job I would go back to New York, where I was living with my family, and then I’d come back for two weeks, and then I would go back to New York. Every time I came back, the pants were tighter. I was like this is weird. I’ve been going to the gym…

George Clooney: He’s eating like a grape and I’m doing this.

Matt Damon: So it’s nice having friends like that.

George Clooney: Yeah… I’m just looking out for you. I didn’t do too.. I was busy. I didn’t have a whole lot of… there wasn’t a lot of goofing around.

monuments_men_4

Mr. Goodman, could you talk a bit about what it was like working with Jean Durjardin?

John Goodman: Working with Jean was great. He spoke English this time, and I still refuse to learn French. It was probably my happiest filmmaking experience, this last year doing this film. It was just wonderful.

Grant Heslov: It was better than Argo? Better than Argo?

John Goodman: Almost!

George Clooney: Jean is such a… he’s really fun and he’s really funny and he really loves what he does. Everybody gets it. The minute he walks into the room, he’s just funny. Every single prop, he can do something hysterical with.

Grant Heslov: He’s like the French George. They’re like twins.

When it comes to motivation and inspiration, do you feel it’s changed from when you first started out as an actor, and can you tell me a little bit about what it is?

George Clooney: Well, when you start out as an actor you’re just trying to get a job. I wasn’t really motivated to be the 6th banana on The Facts of Life, but I was thrilled to have the job. So things just change as time goes on, and Grant and I have been partners for a long time and have been interested in trying to find stories that are unique and also stories that aren’t necessarily slam dunks for the studio to make, which will require us to sort of pick up and carry in. This one, as the cast grew, it became a lot easier to swallow, but it’s hard to make films like this. It was hard to get Argo made. It took us a long time to get Argo made. It was hard to get Good Night, Good Luck. I had to mortgage my house for it. There’s a bunch of… we’re just trying to do films that aren’t necessarily… that you wouldn’t necessarily walk in and say oh yea, that’s an easy one. Sometimes they’re successful, and sometimes they aren’t, but they’re the ones that we want to make. I think all of our inspiration in general is to try to get stories made, that if we didn’t go after them they probably wouldn’t get made. The others are going to get made anyway, so that’s what we’re trying to do.

There was such a quietly intense but brutal scene, the one where they discover the barrels of gold teeth. I wanted to ask you what inspired you to write this scene, which touches upon the Holocaust, and how important it was to show that aspect.

George Clooney: It’s in the book though, isn’t it? That scene. They found barrels of teeth, the Monuments Men did when they found all the gold and the wedding rings.

Grant Heslov: We actually, in reality they found barrels and barrels of stuff. We talked about the idea of somehow making it smaller, but making it more impactful and personal. Not only did George direct that sequence brilliantly but when they’re all going up in the elevator, and Matt’s reaction when they saw… it’s a beautifully done piece of work, but it’s also… we talked about the idea, this was a balancing act because this isn’t a movie about the Holocaust, but you can’t not address it. This was our way of addressing it without getting too far off-track of the story we’re trying to tell.

What is it about art that inspires you still today? 

Bob Balaban: One of the things that attracted me to this is that I’ve always known about the stealing of the art but never really the extent of it. The question that the movie poses specifically, and I thought it was great that George, your character has said this a couple of times in the movie, why is it so important that you should kill so many people, but try to eradicate their culture is so significant. It’s something very hard to get across in another piece of art, in a movie. I thought the script and then the movie did it beautifully. I think the question that we all are struggling with all the time is it just pretty? What does art do for us? How does it represent us? It’s our whole inner life out there for people to see. It’s subtle but I think it’s very hard to depict but I thought the movie did it very well.

the-monuments-men-hugh-bonneville-george-clooney-matt-damon

John Goodman, do you go and research the real-life counterpart for your character, fill in the back story of yourself? We find a little bit about these guys as the film goes on. Do you research the character and then have it all in your head when you’re playing the part?

John Goodman: Oddly enough, the guy my character was based on was from my hometown in St. Louis, Missouri. He did a sculpture in downtown St. Louis that I would drive by on the city bus every time I went downtown with my mother. To me, that was very remarkable and it touched something in me and grounded me in that way. I used from what I knew from the gentlemen in the book, among other things that were written about him, and the script tied everything together for me.

Matt, your good buddy George, what’s it like working for him as a director? And for Cate, compared to Woody Allen, how is George as a director?

George Clooney: Oh easy, easy!

Matt Damon: Working with George was very similar with working with Soderbergh, which makes sense because they worked so much together over the years and had a company together for a long time. George is obscenely talented as a director, I have to say. It can be a little annoying being his pal because it’s kind of like God said maybe this time I’ll just give one of them everything. How about let’s make him handsome. I’ll tell you what; as he gets older, he’ll look even better. In closing, honest to God this was one of the best experiences I’ve had. I’ve had better experiences that I could ever have asked for. I’ve worked with the very best directors around and he belongs in that company, or even ahead of it.

John Goodman: It’s like an emotional strip club.

Cate Blanchett: Working with Woody [Allen] is like working in an emotional strip club without the cash. I’m very happy to be working with these fellas.

Are there any Monuments Men still with us? And have you had any feedback from them?

George Clooney: Harry Ettlinger, who is the young German man in the film, the real guy is coming to the premiere, and he’s written us some really lovely notes. He really was at 13 he fled his bar mitzvah and ended up in New Jersey. The whole Rembrandt thing, you can actually see him in the photo in the end credits holding up the Rembrandt that he wasn’t allowed to see that was in his hometown. And he got to find it. There are a few of them still alive, they’re the younger ones obviously because most of these guys…

Grant Heslov: We’ve got a lot of people, a lot of families who have reached out to us, saying that my grandfather was in the Monuments Men, here are some pictures. In fact, I got a letter from one woman the other day who didn’t know anything about this book, and through the press of the film saw the cover of the book and the photo of the cover of the book, her grandfather was on that photo. She was over the moon so she’s going to come to the premiere.

… and George I wanted to ask you about the nomination of the film Gravity.

Grant Heslov: What one?

George Clooney: Gravity, it’s an astronaut film. I thought the film fell apart about half an hour into it.

Matt Damon: Oh, the Sandra Bullock movie! Oh fantastic.

George Clooney: Alfonso Cuaron is, again, one of the great geniuses in the game. He really is a genius. He hasn’t made a bad film. He has great love of what he does. I can’t tell you what an honor it was to work with him and see what he was doing, and man, I was telling you, we had no idea what was going on because it was two years of post production finishing that film. They were doing stuff that they hadn’t had even invented yet in terms of CGI and stuff like that. It was great working with him and fun.

the-monuments-men-george-clooney-bill-murray-john-goodman

From director George Clooney, THE MONUMENTS MEN stars George Clooney, Matt Damon, Bill Murray, John Goodman, Jean Dujardin, Bob Balaban, Hugh Bonneville, and Cate Blanchette. The screenplay is by George Clooney and Grant Heslov, based on the book by Robery M. Edsel with Bret Witter. Produced by Grant Heslov and George Clooney.

FOR MORE INFO: 

FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/MonumentsMenMovie

WEBSITE: http://www.monumentsmenmovie.com/

THE MONUMENTS MEN invades theaters February 7th

hr_The_Monuments_Men_6

January 30, 2014

WAMG Gets Bloody At The CARRIE Press Day

Filed under: Featured Articles,General News — Tags: , , — Melissa Howland @ 9:16 pm

carrie-chloe-grace-moretz-3-600x337

Fear her power! Unleash the telekinetic horror with CARRIE on Digital HD, Blu-ray and DVD now from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios and Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment. In celebration of CARRIE’s home release I sat down with director Kimberly Peirce to talk about the film… and they also dumped a giant bucket of blood on my pretty blue hair. Nothing can prepare you for how cold and thick that blood is. You can see me cringe! Check it out below.

CARRIE is a reimagining of the classic horror tale about Carrie White (Chloë Grace Moretz), a shy girl outcast by her peers and sheltered by her deeply religious mother (Julianne Moore), who unleashes telekinetic terror on her small town after being pushed too far at her senior prom.

Directed by Kimberly Peirce and produced by Kevin Misher, with a screenplay by Lawrence D. Cohen and Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa, the film is a production of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures and Screen Gems and was released in theatres on October 18, 2013.

carrie-chloe-grace-moretz3-600x399

FOR MORE INFO: 

WEBSITE: http://youwillknowhername.com/
TWITTER: http://twitter.com/CarrieMovie
INSTAGRAM: http://instagram.com/officialcarriemovie
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/CarrieMovie

CARRIE IS AVAILABLE ON BLU-RAY™ & DVD NOW #WHATHAPPENEDTOCARRIE

carrie-bluray-dvd-CarrieBD_rgb-560x668

January 28, 2014

TOP TEN TUESDAY: Peter Cushing – His Ten Best Movie Roles

TTT

Article by Jim Batts, Dana Jung, Michael Haffner, Sam Moffitt, and Tom Stockman

Peter Cushing (1913-1994) was one of the most respected and important actors in the horror and fantasy film genres. To his many fans, the British star was known as ‘The Gentle Man of Horror’ and is recognized for his work with Hammer Films which began in the late 1950’s, but he had numerous memorable roles outside of Hammer. A topnotch actor who was able to deliver superb performances on a consistent basis, Peter Cushing also had range.  He could play both the hero and the villain with ease.

SUPER-8 PETER CUSHING MOVIE MADNESS takes place February 4th at The Way Out Club in St. Louis and will be a great way to celebrate the actor’s career. The event is on February 4th beginning at 8pm. Condensed versions (average length: 15 minutes) of these great Peter Cushing films will be screened on a big screen on Super-8 sound film: DR WHO DALEKS INVASION EARTH 2150 AD, THE BEAST MUST DIE, STAR WARS, AT THE EARTH’S CORE, TWINS OF EVIL, THE GORGON, and HORROR OF DRACULA. The non- Peter Cushing Super-8 films we’ll be showing February 4th are: W.C. Fields in IT’S A GIFT, Steve Martin in THE JERK, WAR OF THE WORLDS, THOSE MAGNIFICENT MEN IN THEIR FLYING MACHINES, HOUSE OF FRANKENSTEIN, ABBOTT AND COSTELLO GO TO MARS, and a Horror Movie Trailer Reel. We’ll have some Peter Cushing trivia with great prizes as well as the usual T-Shirt and Poster giveaways. The show starts at 8pm and goes until Midnight. The Way Out Club is located at 2525 Jefferson Avenue (at Gravois) in South St. Louis. Admission is only $3.00. Yummy Way Out Pizzas are available. The Facebook invite for the event can be found HEREhttps://www.facebook.com/events/673107166044849

Here, according to We Are Movie Geeks, are Peter Cushing’s ten best roles:

skull1

10. Dr. Maitland

During the 1960s, Amicus Studios had a knack for borrowing from the pool of Hammer Studios actors and filmmakers to make their own Hammer-inspired films.  While these movies (some would call them rip-offs) were usually inferior to the original Hammer signature productions, with THE SKULL in 1965, they hit all aces.  Based on a Robert Bloch (PSYCHO) story, THE SKULL got a Hammer director in Freddie Francis (EVIL OF FRANKENSTEIN, DRACULA HAS RISEN…), plus the classic duo of Hammer Films actors, Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing.   With Lee in solid support, Cushing essays one of his best roles as Dr. Maitland, a seemingly mild-mannered collector of occult objects.  Unfortunately for Dr. Maitland, when his latest acquisition is the possessed skull of the Marquis de Sade, he gets much more than he bargained for.  THE SKULL is a superior supernatural thriller shot with flair and imagination by Francis.  The visual style is dark and foreboding, and some sequences are shot from the point of view of the skull, giving us a “skulls-eye view” if you will.  This technique is used to great effect in the latter stages of the movie, as the evil spirit tries to exert its influence on Dr. Maitland.  Cushing is excellent as a man of science and genteel nature being torn apart by forces he can neither understand nor control.  The entire second half of the film is essentially a battle of wills between Maitland and the demonic skull, embodying all of de Sade’s “cruelty and savagery.”  Many of these scenes have a nightmarish quality, such as when Maitland is forced to play Russian roulette.  Here Cushing displays such simple desperation that we identify with him completely.  By the film’s end, when the final struggle for Maitland’s soul is reaching a climax, Cushing expresses emotions by letting all the bewilderment, fear, and relief play across his face in various degrees.  Even those of us most comfortable in our knowledge and beliefs can be undone when faced with the unknown.

cashondemand2

9. Harry Fordyce

CASH ON DEMAND  (1962) is a film that shows how versatile Peter Cushing could be.  In a part with no fantastic or supernatural elements Cushing simply owns the movie, along with Andre Morrell who has a basically fool proof scheme to rob the bank (on Christmas Eve on less) which Cushing’s Harry Fordyce manages.  Fordyce is the original horrible boss, brow beating and talking down to his employees, threatening their careers and throwing temper tantrums over ink pens and minute amounts of money. Morrell is holding Fordyce’ family hostage and threatens to kill them unless the vault is cleaned out by the end of the day.  Fordyce has to help him or risk losing his wife and children who are “all he’s got”.  In a heartbreaking scene he admits as much to an employee whose help he needs to insure the robbery goes as planned and that he “has no friends.”  Cushing takes us from despising this little martinet to hoping he can somehow keep his family and his job.  Shot and edited to more or less real time Cash on Demand is as suspenseful as the best Hitchcock films, and Cushing helps make it work beautifully as a thriller.  He gives Fordyce a set of nervous mannerisms including, standing up on his tip toes and rocking back on his heels, straightening his tie, cocking his head to one side, adjusting his eyeglasses, smoothing his hair and by the film’s end he is doing them all at once bringing the tension to an excruciating level.  And there is a double twist ending that is incredible and I would not reveal to anyone, watch it and see!

drwho2

8. Dr. Who

DR. WHO AND THE DALEKS (1965) was the first taste of the Doctor Who name for the American market (the TV show had yet to air stateside). It was not a success here though Cushing was cast instead of William Hartnell (the TV Doctor at the time) because he would have been more familiar to American audiences. Cushing’s Doctor in the film, and its sequel DALEKS INVASION EARTH 2150, is not a 900-year old nameless Timelord from the planet Gallifrey as in the show, but simply a daffy old human scientist named Dr. Who who’s invented a machine to travel through space and time. These changes are probably the reason why these films aren’t really recognized as proper Doctor Who amongst the show’s die-hard fans. Cushing plays the character as a kindly, absent-minded grandfather, similar to the character he would later play in AT THE EARTH’S CORE and a lighter portrayal than what the TV actors were known for. The story had Dr. Who and his companions encountering the metal monsters known as the Daleks on the lost planet of Skaro and was aimed squarely at the family adventure crowd. It was fun and colorful, yet never campy. Still, the show’s fans hated it at the time, though their opinion has softened over the years. DALEKS INVASION EARTH 2150, released the following year, was darker and a bit more serious, and is considered to be a superior sequel.

nightcreatures2

7. Reverend Blyss

In Hammer’s NIGHT CREATURES (1962) we get a look at how well Peter Cushing could play a part portrayed by another good actor around the same time period.  About a year after Night Creatures was released to theaters Walt Disney broadcast The Scarecrow, an early miniseries, on Disney’s Wonderful World of Color.  Both productions tell essentially the same story, a tale of smuggling, secret identities and piracy based on stories written by Russell Thorndyke. Cushing is simply terrific as Dr. Blyss, the British title of Hammer’s production, a smarmy, self absorbed vicar in the tiny hamlet of Romney Marsh (he admits at one point his favorite topic of conversation is himself!)  The vicar has a secret, he is really Captain Clegg a notorious pirate and now smuggler and many of the small town’s men are his own pirate crew.  Patrick McGoohan played the same character in Disney’s beloved production under the character’s original name, Dr Syn.  Both versions are excellent and are fine examples that show there is more than one way for good actors to play an engaging part.  Just for more contrast there is a version from the 30s called Dr. Syn, with George Arliss, which is also a nice production.

grimsdyke1

6. Arthur Grimsdyke

When the great Mr. Cushing wasn’t haunting the hallowed halls of Hammer Studios he was often found at nearby Amicus Studios lending his considerable talents to their line of horror anthology features. In their biggest box office hit TALES FROM THE CRYPT, based on the much beloved EC comics line of the 1950’s, Peter was cast not as a demented doctor or an intrepid investigator, but finally got the full make-up treatment and played a monster, albeit a very sympathetic one. Comics originators Bill Gaines and Al Feldstein always said that the dead rising from the grave to exact revenge on their tormentors in life was their favorite type of spook story and such is the tale of Arthur Grimsdyke (a much better moniker than Abner from the original 1952 “Haunt of Fear” page-turner). For much of this segment (one of five in the 1972 flick) Cushing played a kindly, gentle character which, by many accounts, was much like the actor himself. Arthur rescues broken toys from the trash (he’s a long-time city worker), repairs them and gifts them to the neighborhood kids when not taking in stray dogs. This helps fill his days after the passing of his beloved wife. The fact that Cushing himself had lost his dear Helen after nearly 30 years of marriage (this was the first film he had done after a several month break to mourn) gives the scene of Arthur trying to talk to his wife via a “spirit board” an extra emotional heft. Unfortunately, the across the street neighbor lusts after his property and begins a campaign  to get Arthur to vacate. The sequences of him losing his dog, his job, and his young “mates” (the helpful neighbor invited the local “mums” to tea and warn them about that “filthy old man”) are wrenching. The final straw is on Valentines Day as Arthur is stunned to receive a bundle of cards from the postman. But each one contains a cruel, taunting poem, courtesy of said neighbor. Your veins may be full of ice water if you aren’t moved by Cushing’s excellent work here. He goes from euphoric to bewildered to deflated in just a few seconds of screen time as he reads them aloud. This pushes him over the edge and sets up one of the film’s greatest images after a flash forward as the year-old corpse of Grimsdyke claws out of the grave. Kudos to make-up master Roy Ashton in giving us a ghoul worthy of original comic artist “Ghastly” Graham Ingles. Arthur’s sublime rhyme crime (couldn’t resist) is a memorable capper to the segment. Prior to this film we knew that Cushing could shiver our spines, but with this superb performance he proved he could also touch our hearts.

holmes1

5. Sherlock Holmes

In 1959, riding high with their successes reviving Frankenstein and Dracula, Hammer Studios turned to one of the greatest detective stories ever written, A. Conan Doyle’s THE HOUND OF THE BASKERVILLES.  It is said that the Sherlock Holmes character has been filmed more than any other, so it probably seemed like a grand idea to employ the formidable resources of Hammer to bring arguably the best Holmes story to life.  The result was not only one of the best Hammer films, but also one of the best Sherlock Holmes movies of all time.  Hammer brought their A-team to film the tale; director Terrence Fisher had already helmed Hammer’s reboots of Dracula and Frankenstein, with the Mummy soon to follow.  Hammer’s dynamic duo of Cushing and Christopher Lee signed on to play Holmes and Sir Henry Baskerville, respectively.  Add to these credits Hammer’s stable of production personnel, and the result is a prime example of the studio in its glory days, with a sumptuous musical score, outstanding sets and costumes, and atmospheric cinematography—the first Holmes story ever filmed in color.  While some of the original book’s details were modified to augment the more Gothic and horrific elements of the story, the movie as a whole is a faithful adaptation.  For his part, Lee was given the rare opportunity to play a romantic lead, which he relished—especially given the beauty of his costar, Marla Landi.   Lee also once remarked that a difference between he and Cushing—and perhaps a key to their onscreen chemistry—was that he used a more economical style of acting, whereas Cushing was more energetic.  Lee never moved or made an action unless it was necessary to the performance, while Cushing utilized constant motion and activity to enhance his portrayals.  This quality serves Cushing well as Holmes, whether he is gesturing or walking about a room, he is in constant motion to show that a brilliant mind is capable of attending to both physical and mental chores with equal acuity.  Cushing also uses his physical presence to display Holmes’ sometimes aggressive nature, by standing a bit too close to other characters when interrogating them.  Cushing is so immersed in the portrayal that he doesn’t need to resort to disguises and subterfuge to gain an advantage in this investigation.  Cushing is at times rude, reticent, or overbearing to not only accentuate the eccentricity of the classic character, but also to fool the audience into believing a character trait when the opposite is true.  Unfortunately, audiences at the time were possibly oversaturated with Holmes, and the film fared poorly at the box office (the classic Basil Rathbone portrayals of Holmes were still relatively fresh, with the last Rathbone Holmes  film released just a dozen years before Hammer’s version, to say nothing of the numerous 1950s television portrayals by Rathbone and others).  As a result, a planned series of Holmes films starring Cushing never materialized.  This is sad news for movie lovers, because with his precise diction, hat, and pipe, it’s elementary that Cushing was one of the very best incarnations of the world’s greatest detective.

twins1

4. Gustav Weil

“The Gentleman of Horror” may be best known to fright fans as Baron Von Frankenstein or Dracula’s nemesis Van Helsing, but Cushing created just as memorable of a character with the terrifying Gustav Weil. The Hammer film TWINS OF EVIL arrived later in the British studio’s run of classic horror films. It’s considered the first in a loose trilogy of films called The Karnstein Trilogy; all of which stem from the erotic vampire novel CARMILLA. The family of vampires featured in the series is known for their ability to be able to walk around in the daylight and for their insatiable lust for the female flesh. Eliminating lesbian vampires is no easy task, but Gustav Weil’s main objective in TWINS OF EVIL is precisely that. In all seriousness though, Cushing plays the puritanical leader of a religious order called “The Brotherhood” with maniacal zeal and brutal intensity.  You would hate the character all the more if it weren’t for a few scenes where you see that he may actually have a heart underneath his questionable ‘rule with an iron fist’ demeanor.  He says to his wife in one scene, “I have tried always to be a good man.”  Her response speaks to the essence of the character: Yes . . . you have tried. The character of Gustav Weil only appeared in TWINS OF EVIL. Cushing was meant to play a different vampire killer in all three of the Karnstein films but had to bow out of LUST FOR A VAMPIRE due to his wife’s illness and subsequent passing.  It’s been widely discussed by some of his costars that Cushing was nothing more than a kind gentleman on the set between scenes.  That kindness is nowhere to be found on-screen in Cushing’s take on the evilness that can reside in religious fervor.

starwars2

3. Grand Moff Tarkin

A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away . . . . Peter Cushing portrayed one of the most intimidating figures in the galactic universe. Not just anybody can raise his or her voice to the supremely evil Darth Vader and scold him for force-choking someone. But that is exactly what Grand Moff Tarkin does in his very first scene in George Lucas’ original sci-fi classic. With his never changing stern expression and icy stare, Cushing commands every scene he’s in, which is actually only a handful of short scenes in the entire 121 minute film. Lucas was originally thinking that Cushing would play the part of Obi -Wan Kenobi – a part eventually given to Sir Alec Guinness – before having him play the small but integral role of a General in the Galactic Empire and commander of the Death Star. His prescience is felt on the Death Star as he plays a central part in the interrogation of Princess Leia. The character has become so popular with fans of the STAR WARS series that a younger version of him can be seen in EPISODE III- REVENGE OF THE SITH and for THE CLONE WARS animated tv series. Outside of his horror films with Hammer Studios, many remember Cushing the most for this small but pivotal role.  Who needs more than 10 minutes of actual screen time when you get to deliver such juicy lines as, “We will then crush the rebellion with one swift stroke.”

vanhelsing1

2. Professor Van Helsing

Peter Cushing’s signature role aside from the obsessed corpse-stealing Baron (who was really more of a monster than any of his experiments) was this horror hero created by Bram Stoker. Cushing essayed some version of vampire slayer Van Helsing in five films, as opposed to his six outings as the demented doctor. Let’s start with the first and best outing, 1958’s HORROR OF DRACULA. This is a more dynamic slayer than Edward Van Sloan’s slow-moving professor who faced Bela Lugosi in the 1931 DRACULA. Cushing gives us a determined crusader who’s not intimidated by the locals as he searches for Harker in 1885. Later we get a bit of whimsy as his servant is confused by Van Helsing’s use of an early version of a dictaphone (“I thought you were talking to someone” “Yes, I was talking to m’self”). But he’s all business as he meets the Holmwoods and see that Harker’s fiancée Lucy has been visited by the Count. Later the doctor is in full action hero mode as he swoops in to save Arthur and his little daughter Tania from a deadly kiss from his undead sister (love the cross searing into her forehead!). Then there’s the softer side of our hero as he gently comforts the shaken child ( Giving her a cross necklace “Will you wear this pretty thing?’ and bundling her up in his coat “You look like a Teddy bear”). But his best (and most physical) work is saved for the film’s fabulous finale. After a furious horse carriage chase, Van Helsing finds Count Dracula (Christopher Lee) attempting to hide from the approaching dawn. The two struggle and the doctor appears to pass out from the Count’s vise-like grip. But as the vampire leans in, fangs ready to strike, Van Helsing’s eyes burst open (ah, playing possum!). He’s able to push the fiend off of him, hop on to a long table, and leap to a curtain (like a classic film swashbuckler), ripping it away to reveal the streaming sunlight. But that’s not all! As Dracula tries to crawl away from those killing rays, Van Helsing stops him in his tracks by grabbing a pair of candlestick holders and using them as a cross to keep him at bay. Supposedly Cushing himself came up with many of the stunts, making for one of Hammer’s most thrilling hits (I saw it while home from school sick, catching it on the local TV morning move. I was practically bouncing off the walls during the last moments, adrenaline destroying that flu bug!). Of course, the studio would have to make a sequel, but it didn’t feature the Count (Lee wouldn’t don the cape and teeth again for several more years). Instead 1960’s THE BRIDES OF DRACULA stars Cushing once again as Abraham Van Helsing who tracks down a disciple of Dracula, Baron Meinster. We get to see the doctor early on as an almost fatherly figure to the innocent Marianne, the Baron’s intended victim. In order to protect her, he must do his job, first having to dispatch the tragic mother of the Baron (she actually tries to hide her fangs). The film’s high point is the big throw-down between the doctor and Meinster. But this has a much different outcome than the battle from the last film. Thanks in part to his crazed, still human, servant Greta, the Baron knocks out the doctor and bites him! When Van Helsing awakes, he sees the throat marks in a mirror. Cushing registers shock, despair, and resignation within seconds of his realization. But then his determination kicks in as he grabs a horseshoe maker’s tool from a blazing brazier (the fight was in a stable) and sears it into the wound. Before he passes out once more, he splashes his smoldering neck with holy water. The bite marks disappear and Van Helsing recovers in time to destroy Meinster using a windmill.  It would be a dozen years before Cushing would return as the doctor in DRACULA A.D. 1972. This entry veers away from Hammer’s series as it opens in 1872 with  Lawrence (?) Van Helsing and Dracula battling on top of a careening stagecoach. When it crashes, the Count (Lee again) is impaled on a broken wagon wheel. The doctor uses all of his strength to push Dracula on to the spikes, before he dies of his injuries. In the then modern year of 1972, the vampire lord is resurrected and sets his sights on Jessica, granddaughter of Professor Lorrimer (Cushing ) Van Helsing. The film focuses on the current “grooovey” trappings and gives Cushing little to do until the big rescue finale. The intervening years had taken a toll on the actor, and besides the opening sequence, there’s little action work. But the prof would be back next year in THE SATANIC RITES OF DRACULA with Jessica now a member of the British Secret Service  investigating an occult high society club and a plot by Drac to unleash a new plague (is he trying to destroy his own food supply?). Again, Cushing is kept out of much of the pseudo 007-style action until he must, once again, rescue his granddaughter from Drac in the big finale. The film’s highlight may be a conversation between Lorrimer and the mysterious D.D. Denham who is, in reality,the Count. In order to keep up the ruse, a harsh light is trained on the prof”s eyes while Dracula speaks in a heavy accent (Lee almost seems to be mimicking Lugosi). It was back to the past for Cushing’s final slayer role in the following year’s THE LEGEND OF THE 7 GOLDEN VAMPIRES. This co-production between Hammer and Hong Kong’s Shaw Brothers Studio set in 1904 finds him as Professor Lawrence Van Helsing (could he be the son of Abraham? A nephew?) enlisted to help a rural village in China destroy the title menace. Cushing stays out of most of  the martial arts mayhem (yup, it’s the first kung-fu vampire flick), but goes into action in the final moments when it’s revealed that Kah the High Priest behind the seven is really (of course) Count Dracula in disguise. But Lee bowed out of this hybrid and actor John Forbes-Robertson is on the receiving end of Cushing’s spear. In five films over the course of sixteen years, Peter Cushing made this unstoppable adversary of evil one of the movies’ most dynamic, enduring heroes.

drfrank1

1. Doctor Frankenstein

While Peter Cushing mastered the role of hero with his portrayals of Dr. Van Helsing, it was his performances as the villainous Baron Victor Frankenstein that launched him to horror film immortality. Over the course of six films for Hammer studios, all but one directed by Terence Fisher, Cushing showed how a man can evolve into something truly evil because he is obsessed with the desire to bring life back to a corpse. In CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN (1957), the Doctor embarks on his life-long quest to be the first human being to create life. But, as in the sequels, the real monster is Victor Frankenstein, a man who becomes consumed first by ambition, then arrogance, and eventually madness. Cushing’s portrayal of Frankenstein however, makes this monster personable and likable – the viewer almost wishes at times that he succeeds in the end. Although Baron Frankenstein seemed to pay for his sins against man and nature with his life at the end of the first film, Hammer and director Fisher nonetheless managed to save him for the intelligently written and solidly directed sequel THE REVENGE OF FRANKENSTEIN (1958). Assuming a new identity and becoming the director of a hospital for the poor, he builds a body for his crippled assistant (Michael Gwynn) from parts plucked from his patients. Unfortunately, body battles mind for supremacy and transforms the man into a shuffling, murderous cannibal. Cushing plays the Baron much more heroically and makes him less villainous than in Curse, however he doesn’t take the edge away. In THE EVIL OF FRANKENSTEIN (1963 – the only film in the series not helmed by Terence Fisher but by Freddie Francis) the monster (Kiwi Kingston) is a flat-top Karloff clone that lumbers about and growls a lot.  Although not as memorable as Christopher Lee’s creature in CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN, this monster does give Mr. Cushing plenty of opportunity to use his athleticism.  The Baron chases, leaps on, and actually tangles with this beast, at one point using a burning lamp to fend him off. Many of the movie’s trappings are lifted directly from the Universal Frankenstein series— the monster frozen in ice, the return to the ransacked castle, the exploding lab at the movie’s end, making the film seems like an anomaly in the Hammer series. FRANKENSTEIN CREATED WOMAN (1967) is one of the most unusual Hammer films. Although ostensibly a horror film, it is probably better described as a gothic romance and as such, it ranks among most intelligent of all Frankenstein films. Here the doctor isn’t creating a patchwork man, but instead a beautiful woman (played by tragic beauty Susan Denberg) and attempting to inhabit her body with a soul. The story is a peculiar one, but it has all the elements of a great gothic tale – dark secrets, tragic love, and ultimate justice. FRANKENSTEIN MUST BE DESTROYED (1969) is the one film where Peter Cushing plays the Baron as an utter villain – a blackmailer, rapist, murderer, and ruthless tyrant.  In order to continue his experiments, the Baron blackmails a young couple into helping him abduct a brilliant but mad brain surgeon from the lunatic asylum so that he can operate on him, cure his sanity and transplant his brain into another body. FRANKENSTEIN MUST BE DESTROYED is the most unpleasant, yet suspenseful film in the series.  In FRANKENSTEIN AND THE MONSTER FROM HELL (1973), Victor Frankenstein has shorn his old identity and taken control of an insane asylum that serves as a source of parts for his continuing experiments. With the help of a young medical student who has read Frankenstein’s 20-year-old texts on his early efforts, Frankenstein creates a creature (David Prowse) from parts of the inmates. The dark crowded asylum where the story takes place serves as the perfect mirror for Frankenstein’s mental state and Cushing’s intense and forceful performance of this man now lost in insanity is mesmerizing. Although Hammer Studios was in its waning days, this final reunion for Cushing and Terence Fisher, who together launched Hammer’s gothic dynasty with CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN, was a worthy end to their collaborations.

January 26, 2014

Thomas Edison’s FRANKENSTEIN Screening in St. Louis Feb. 6th – A look Back at 1910

Filed under: Featured Articles,General News,Movies — Tags: , , — Tom Stockman @ 9:53 pm

1910-HEADER

FRANKENSTEIN, starring Boris Karloff and directed by James Whale in 1931, is usually referred to as the ‘original’ movie version of Mary Shelly’s 1818 novel. It will be screened in its restored Blu-ray format on February 6th at Schlafly Bottleworks in St. Louis so movie buffs will have the chance to see this classic again on the big screen. But, as any real horror movie buff knows, the Karloff/Whale version of FRANKENSTEIN was not the first time Shelly’s story was filmed. Inventor Thomas Edison filmed his own take 21 years earlier. Edison’s 1910 FRANKENSTEIN only runs 14 minutes and it will be screened after the Karloff version at Schlafly on February 6th.

The story behind the first FRANKENSTEIN is a fascinating one. Thomas Edison had been the leading pioneer of the first kinetoscopes, an early motion picture viewing device, and then projected motion pictures. His FRANKENSTEIN was filmed in 1910 at Edison Motion Picture Studios located in the Bronx, New York, one of several dozen movies the studio produced that year. The studio was built between 1906 and 1907 in response to the growing demand for films.

1910-1

Here’s how the March 15, 1910 edition of The Edison Kinetogram, the catalog that the Edison Company would send to distributors to hype their new films, described FRANKENSTEIN:

“To those familiar with Mrs. Shelly’s story it will be evident that we have carefully omitted anything which might be any possibility shock any portion of the audience. In making the film the Edison Co. has carefully tried to eliminate all actual repulsive situations and to concentrate its endeavors upon the mystic and psychological problems that are to be found in this weird tale. Wherever, therefore, the film differs from the original story it is purely with the idea of eliminating what would be repulsive to a moving picture audience. To those familiar with Mrs. Shelly’s story it will be evident that we have carefully omitted anything which might be any possibility shock any portion of the audience. In making the film the Edison Co. has carefully tried to eliminate all actual repulsive situations and to concentrate its endeavors upon the mystic and psychological problems that are to be found in this weird tale. Wherever, therefore, the film differs from the original story it is purely with the idea of eliminating what would be repulsive to a moving picture audience.”

The part of the monster in the 1910 FRANKENSTEIN was played by actor Charles Ogle. He joined the Edison Stock Company Players in 1909 and had portrayed Scrooge in a 1910 Edison production of A CHRISTMAS CAROL and George Washington in a series of films on the history of the United States. Since actors at the time were responsible for their own wardrobe and makeup, it was likely Ogle one who developed the monster’s wild-eyed, nightmarish appearance, with its shrieking grimace, straw-like hair and clawed hands. FRANKENSTEIN premiered on Friday, March 18, 1910, a mere two months after it had finished shooting (such a quick turnaround was not uncommon at the time). The film was well-received by critics.

1910-2

The New York Dramatic Mirror wrote:

“This deeply impressive story makes a powerful film subject, and the Edison players have handled it with effective expression and skill.”

However, FRANKENSTEIN did not find an audience in 1910. There are several possible reasons that may have contributed to its box-office failure. FRANKENSTEIN was the first horror movie and audiences unaccustomed to such a weird story may not have known what to make of it. Also, movies were already becoming more sophisticated. Directors were using close-ups and editing within scenes so it’s possible that audiences found director James Dawley’s stagey wide shots to be old fashioned. Or perhaps audiences were offended by the blasphemous content of the film with its theme of man creating man, especially during the creation scene, one where Dr. Frankenstein’s success is more through alchemy than science. Whatever the reason, FRANKENSTEIN quickly faded from the public’s minds. In those days, Edison Studios would only strike a few dozen prints of each of their films, which would then be sent out for distribution. After the films had circulated for a few months, they were returned where they were stripped for their silver content. It’s hard to comprehend today but films in the early silent days were considered a quickly disposable medium and no thought was given to preserving them after their initial money making run. Film then was made with a chemically unstable silver nitrate that deteriorated and even spontaneously combusted if not stored correctly. It is for these reasons that it is estimated between eighty and ninety percent of all silent films are irretrievably lost.

1910-7

Film preservationist Robert A. Harris has said: “Most of the early films did not survive because of wholesale junking by the studios. There was no thought of ever saving these films. They simply needed vault space and the materials were expensive to house.”

1910-4

Edison’s 1910 FRANKENSTEIN was for many decades though lost with not as much as a single still of its production surviving. In1963 a film historian discovered the March 15, 1910 edition of the aforementioned The Edison Kinetogram with its picture of Charles Ogle in full Frankenstein make up on its cover in the Edison archives in New Jersey. That photo was published in numerous books and magazines, including Famous Monsters of Filmland, sparking a renewed interest among horror film buffs. In 1980, the American Film Institute declared the 1910 production of FRANKENSTEIN to be one of the top ten most “Culturally and historically significant lost films.”

1910-6

Enter Wisconsin-based film collector Alois Dettlaff. When Detlaff heard the of the film’s placement on the AFI’s list, he announced, to the shock of the film world, that he indeed was in possession of a print of the 1910 FRANKENSTEIN. The sole surviving print had originally belonged to his wife’s grandmother who used to screen the film and other silent shorts as part of a stage show. The film was passed down and eventually landed in the hands of Detlaff. However, Detlaff was originally stingy with his treasure. In the early ‘80s he had allowed a few minutes to be shown as part of a BBC documentary, later released to home video. These snippets would later wind up in various silent cinema video compilations without attribution or payment made to Dettlaff. Feeling slighted, Dettlaff became guarded in allowing the film to be screened. In 1986, he donated a “copyright protected” version of the film, with a copyright notice that scrolled across the center of the film making viewing difficult, to the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences. Dettlaff died in 2005 and finally, in 2010, exactly 100 years after its production, BearManor Media released the film on DVD without the scrolling copyright.

1910-3

So what can one expect when finally seeing Edison’s FRANKENSTEIN? Detlaff ‘s print was in somewhat deteriorated condition, especially the first few minutes. But it is viewable and complete with intertitles and the color tints as seen in 1910. The film is accompanied by a decent synthesized music score. With a running-time of only fourteen minutes, FRANKENSTEIN is necessarily a much abbreviated version of Mary Shelley’s story, yet what remains is a lively and efficient condensation of the novel’s plot.There are some fascinating elements in the film. The special effects of the monster gradually forming before our eyes are extremely primitive by today’s standards but were unprecedented for 1910. The monster is created through chemicals in a large cauldron in a long sequence that employs puppetry and reverse motion and it is both eerie and effective.The use of mirrors is also interesting, with the monster visible in several scenes through the door-sized looking glass in Frankenstein’s bedroom, implying that the creature may be simply a reflection of its own creator.

1910-5

Thomas Edison’s 1910 FRANKENSTEIN will play on the big screen at Schlafly Bottleworks (7260 Southwest Avenue Maplewood, MO 63143) and this is the first time St. Louisans will have the opportunity to see it in a theater-type setting. It will play after the 1931 version of FRANKENSTEIN which begins at 7pm on February 6th. The 1910 version should start around 8:30.

FRANKENSTEIN is the second screening in a new subseries from A Film Series to promote the practice of Universal Design in the built environment (we showed DRACULA last month).

Other horror classic in this series coming soon are:
THE MUMMY – March
THE BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN – April
THE WOLFMAN – May
ABBOTT AND COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN – October

Check back here at We Are Movie Geeks for updates on those screenings.

Brought to you by A Film Series, Schlafly Bottleworks, AUDP and Real Living Gateway Real Estate.
Doors open at 6:30pm.

$6 suggested for the screening. A yummy variety of food from Schlafly’s kitchen is available as are plenty of pints of their famous home-brewed suds. Dan the bartender will be on hand to take care of you.

The Facebook invite for the event can be found HERE
https://www.facebook.com/events/121231038069000/

11x17-basic_work_template

January 22, 2014

IVANHOE Starring St. Louisan King Baggot – A Look Back at 1913

Filed under: Featured Articles,General News,Movies — Tags: , — Tom Stockman @ 8:17 pm

Chepstow_header-560

By 1913, the American film industry had been around for over twenty years. In 1909 Carl Laemmle, a renegade and maverick movie mogul and film distributor, founded his own company in New York — the Yankee Film Company. Laemmle also started producing movies in Fort Lee, New Jersey that same year. His first company was called the Independent Motion Pictures (IMP) Company, aka IMP Studios. Soon however, Laemmle would be making plans to journey West where he would expand his film production and in 1912 co-founded the Universal Film Manufacturing Co., or Universal Film Company – the precursor to Universal Pictures in Hollywood. The studio had its sights set on bigger and better things than the one and two-reel shorts that Hollywood had been grinding out. European studios were producing big, ambitious feature productions and Universal felt the need to compete.

carl-laemmle-560

Sir Walter Scott’s classic novel Ivanhoe was first published in 1820. The story was set in 1194 during the reign of King Richard I and focused on Wilfred of Ivanhoe, a Saxon Knight returning from the Holy Lands to England. His mission was to raise 150,000 marks of silver as ransom for the imprisoned King being held captive in an Austrian cell. Universal saw Ivanhoe as the perfect property to film, and spent a record amount of money to produce it. Their 1913 film IVANHOE was the first example of a studio sending a cast and crew to a remote venue to film on location. They traveled by train to New York, then sailed by ship the 3000 miles to Wales. Their destination was Chepstow Castle, located in Chepstow, Monmouthshire, on top of cliffs overlooking the River Wye. Chepstow Castle was, and remains, the oldest surviving post-Roman stone fortification in Britain, being constructed between the years 1067 and 1188. By the early 20th century, Chepstow had become a major tourist attraction in Wales (In 1977 Terry Gilliam shot some of his film JABBERWOCKY at the castle). The castle was owned at the time by the Duke of Beauford, who agreed to rent it to the studio for one month.

chep10-560

Universal tapped its biggest star, 34-year old King Baggot, to play the title role in IVANHOE. Bagget, who was born and raised in St. Louis, was the first internationally famous movie star of the silent era and the first individually publicized leading man in America, Baggot was referred to as “King of the Movies,” “The Most Photographed Man in the World” and “The Man Whose Face Is As Familiar As The Man In The Moon.” Director Herbert Brenon, who had directed dozens of shorts for the studio, shot IVANHOE and co-starred as Isaac of York. Leah Baird was cast as Rebecca and Evelyn Hope played Lady Rowena. The rest of the cast was made up of local British actors.

ivanhoe12-560

For three or four weeks in 1913, the town of Chepstow took on the state of a festival, as nothing like the filming of IVANHOE had been done on British soil up until that time. All the local hotels were full of Norman knights and damsels with American accents, the local ‘supers’ or extras, apparently went about their work in costume. Locals assisted with the costumes and ‘The Church Boy’s House’, a large social hall, was converted into a props and makeup facility. Reporters from national newspapers and the film press covered the making of IVANHOE in detail, wanting to see how a “great cinematograph picture is taken”. They gave high praise to the making of the battle scenes. The sack of ‘Torquilstone’ caused two days of great excitement involving an army of 300 locals (Universal would claim ‘A Cast of Thousands’ in the film’s marketing). Enthusiastic participation resulted in a number of injuries, mostly minor, as well as many broken ‘weapons’. King Baggot himself was injured during the making of the film when an extra smacked him on the chin with a sword. Baggot can be seen staggering away from the blow in the final film. The filming was described as “the biggest venture of the kind ever attempted in England,” It had a cast of 50 horses as well as 500 people. 20,000 feet of negative were exposed by the two cameramen out of which 3,500 ft made the final three-reel film which lasted a whopping 48 minutes. Correspondents for the British press were on location for the filming and praised King Baggot.

ivanhoe7-560

The Cinematograph Exhibitors Mail wrote:

“What a wonderfully perfect actor is Mr. King Baggot and what an enormous amount of energy he puts into his work. He seems to inspire the rest of the company whenever he is in the picture, with the result that they put much more force into their work than they would otherwise deem necessary. He takes his work completely to heart, and this past week I am sure he has forgotten that he is King Baggot, the best film actor I the world!”

The ambitious IVANHOE, filled with pageantry and excitement, was a huge hit for Universal in 1913. The only film that made more money for the studio that year was the studio’s version of DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE, which also starred King Baggot (and is considered the first Universal horror film). IVANHOE opened in England September 11th 1913 and in the U.S. two weeks later. The domestic ads boasted that the film was smashing box-office records in the UK. In an interesting twist, a British studio, Zenith, produced their own version of IVANHOE in 1913 as well. It was nearly twice as long as the Universal film, but not nearly as well received. It was released in the U.S. under the title REBECCA THE JEWESS and is now considered a lost film.

ivanhoe-silent-movie-1913-4-560

Moving Picture World magazine covered the film of IVANHOE in 1913 and gave it an excellent review. They wrote:

“An earnest and ambitious effort to film high class popular fiction of the type of Sir Walter Scott’s Ivanhoe, deserves the hearty commendation of every friend of moving pictures. Even it the production resulting from such an effort was feeble and imperfect, harsh criticism would be out of place. Happily, the film rendering of Ivanhoe. by the Universal Film Company, does not stand in need of any indulgence but is, on the contrary, entitled to sincere praise purely on its merits. The director has evidently grown with his task and there is-plenty of evidence all through this feature, that care, and time, and patience, and skill entered into the production. In, this film, the Universal Film Company have aimed higher than usual and I am glad to say that their mark is close to the center of the target.”

ivanhoe-silent-movie-1913-560

That was 100 years ago. Since then, Ivanhoe has been filmed at least four more times (perhaps the most famous being the 1952 version starring Robert Taylor and Elizabeth Taylor) and was even a TV show in the ‘50s. Chepstow Castle continued to serve as a major tourist site and an adjacent museum was added to the property which has served as a venue for all sorts of cultural activities. This past year, to celebrate the centennial of IVANHOE being filmed there, the castle sponsored a screening of the movie on its grounds. The event took place July 13th  and was a well-attended success. A local renaissance group adorned in medieval garb began the show by dancing while local opera star Karl Daymond sang.  A newly assembled score, played by a pianist, accompanied the film.  IVANHOE, the first American Studio film epic, has slipped into obscurity in the 100 years since its release and it looks like this opportunity to view it again was a big hit.

For more information about silent film star King Baggot, visit the King Baggot Tribute Facebook  Page HERE

https://www.facebook.com/kingbaggottribute

Photos of the screening of IVANHOE at  Chepstow Castle provided by David Howell

chep1-560 chep2=560 chep3-560 chep7-560 chep8-560 chep9-560

 

 

 

 

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress