DON’T TORTURE A DUCKLING – The Blu Review

Review by Roger Carpenter

While Lucio Fulci made his reputation with a series of graphically violent horror movies like Zombie (AKA Zombi 2), City of the Living Dead (AKA The Gates of Hell), The House by the Cemetery, The Beyond, and The New York Ripper, his early career was a hodgepodge of film genres including comedies, spaghetti westerns, and poliziotteschi.  However, many critics argue that his greatest films were his early gialli films like A Lizard in a Woman’s Skin and Don’t Torture a Duckling.  Fulci was handicapped by terribly low budgets for most of his career but some of his earlier works were actually well-funded, allowing his cinematic craftsmanship to be on full display.  Such was the case with Don’t Torture a Duckling.

As was the case with many gialli of the time period, the film titles were influenced by Argento’s first three gialli, collectively known as the “Animal Trilogy.”  But, just as those films claim very tenuous links with the animals identified in their titles, Don’t Torture a Duckling really has nothing to do with actual ducklings.  There is a Donald Duck doll in the film, but it plays an extremely brief, if important, role in the film.  Perhaps the ducklings mentioned in the film’s title refer to the children in the film, who play a much larger role than the actual doll.


The story takes place in a fictional town in southern Italy.  It’s a quiet town populated by hardworking, blue color people eking out a living the best they can.  Just like any small town the people have their personal dramas and scandals.  For instance, there is a local witch who lives just outside town and skulks through the alleys of the village.  Rumors are she killed her own baby as soon as it was born.  There is also a kind of magician and healer who people seek out on occasion.  Rumors also abound that shortly after the witch was taken in as a young orphan by the magician, she became pregnant.  And lately the town has been abuzz at the intrusion of their tranquility by the brash yet beautiful young woman who is staying at the luxurious villa on the outskirts of town.  It is said her wealthy father has sent her here to clean up her act and kick her drug habit.  But, by and large, the village is a safe, quiet place where people work the countryside and raise their families with the help of a young, charismatic priest who acts as a mentor to all the young boys, watching over them as they play soccer and ensuring they aren’t tempted by impure thoughts.

But evil sometimes can find a foothold even in small, backwater villages.  And evil has come to this town in the guise of a mysterious killer who is murdering the young boys.  As the police struggle to make sense of the crime, the villagers become more angry and confused.  Who is killing their beloved sons?  It could be the big-city reporter, Martelli (Tomas Milian) or the beautiful newcomer Patrizia (Barbara Bouchet).  But the betting folks in the town are guessing it’s Maciara the witch (Florinda Bolkan) or her mentor the magician (Georges Wilson).  But things become even more confused when one of the locals, whom everyone thought harmless, is caught extorting money from the parents of one of the missing boys.  Always considered eccentric due to his learning disability, the villagers are both shocked and enraged with this poor soul’s attempt at leveraging a young boy’s death for his own profit.  He is promptly shipped off to a big city jail.  However, the murders continue to the entire town’s chagrin.  As the tension mounts it seems everyone—including several people who could be the killer—is working to solve this series of crimes before another child is killed.

Don’t Torture a Duckling is a truly unique entry into the gialli subgenre.  It represents a high point in Fulci’s career in terms of production value and available financing.  He was able to surround himself with professional and experienced crew members as well as an extremely strong cast, and it is certainly noticeable as one views the film.  Tomas Milian was a hugely popular star of spaghetti westerns before moving into poliziotteschi as the 1970’s progressed.  He is also a fine actor though his part is relatively small in this outing.  Florinda Bolkan was a relative newcomer to the screen but had made a big splash in Visconti’s arthouse film The Damned as well as co-starring in Petri’s Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion, which won an Oscar for Best Foreign Language Film in 1971.  Barbara Bouchet had come to prominence playing the character Moneypenny in the Bond spoof Casino Royale before becoming a draw in numerous gialli like Black Belly of the Tarantula, Amuck, The French Sex Murders, and The Red Queen Kills Seven Times.  And Marc Porel was a genre heartthrob who would go on to star in many other genre films before dying way too early at age 34. Together with many other well-known character actors who played numerous supporting roles in the film, these folks elevate the film to A-list status. Bolkan, in particular, shows her talent in the nuanced role of an abandoned epileptic who is branded a “witch” by the superstitious townsfolk.

Fulci was also able to afford talent behind the camera as well, such as Giovanni Bergamini, who lensed tons of classic Italian genre films such as Inglorious Bastards, Cannibal Ferox, and the original Django.  Another major contributor was Riz Ortolani, who composed the music for literally hundreds of films, some genuine classics.  Perhaps best known in America for his gut-crunching score for Cannibal Holocaust, the score for Don’t Torture a Duckling is no less effective, if not quite as memorable. Simply listen to his music cues during the brutal beating of Maciara the witch and you will have no doubt you are listening to a master.


Filmed in southern Italy, Fulci makes wonderful use of the sun-drenched scenery.  His wide, sweeping shots of entire mountainsides are equally gorgeous and unsettling in their isolation.  The ancient village is of white stucco and fairly glows as the sun beats down on it.  One can imagine the afternoon heat as the light bounces off the parched-white structures. But even this isolated hamlet is feeling the effect of modernity encroaching from all sides, as elevated superhighways crisscross and cut through the otherwise tranquil vistas of southern Italy.  And it is this progress that perhaps spurs the killer to murder the young boys.  As the police note early on, there is—thankfully—no trace of sexual trauma to the victims, as one might expect.  Unlike in many gialli, this killer doesn’t kill out of some kind of sexual illness.  His—or her—reasons are far more complicated than sexual perversion.  Thanks to the new superhighways prostitutes and cigarettes have become more easily obtainable and, with the increase ease of access even the pre-adolescent boys are being exposed to these vices.  Clearly someone is watching, disapproving, and taking matters into their own hands.

Likewise, Patrizia also may represent progress—or at least the idea of youth, of new ideas and new ways of thinking, and, most importantly, a threat to the old ways of life.  And the old ways of thinking certainly are engrained in these simple villagers.  Each time a suspect is brought to police headquarters for questioning the entire town turns out, screaming, pressing towards the police station, hoping for their own brand of justice.  And when it doesn’t come quickly enough for them, they take matters into their own hands by mercilessly beating the witch.  Sure, they assume she must be behind the murders, but they have no proof and, perhaps more importantly, they don’t trouble themselves with these kinds of details.  They’ve been waiting a long while to rid themselves of this outlier and this represents a perfect chance, guilty or not.

Speaking of Maciara’s bloody and violent end, this violence—and other aspects of the film—created some not unwelcome controversy for Fulci, and probably helped profits along the way.  No stranger to cinematic controversy—Fulci had to appear in court to assure the country his vivisected dogs in his previous film were simply very realistic special effects—Duckling also drew the ire of the public.  The graphic killing of Maciara isn’t just bloody and violent, but is particularly well-done and only enhances the viewer’s sympathy for this unfortunate and misunderstood character.  Too, the multiple depictions of child murder were just as shocking if not nearly as graphic.  Even today the killing of a child in a film is still a bit taboo.  There is also a scene showing a nude Patrizia teasing a pre-teen boy who has entered her room to serve her a drink.  Again, Fulci had to explain how the shot was created to assure the Italian press that no children were actually subjected to Barbara Bouchet’s absolutely gorgeous nude body.

In the end, Fulci’s giallo is a unique, high-quality, and entertaining thriller.  Perhaps not as controversial now as it was in 1972, it nevertheless still packs a punch while delivering a solid murder mystery that was atypical for the time.  If you like gialli but are tired of the sleazy sex and violence typical of these films, try this “thinking man’s” giallo for a different take on the genre.

Arrow Films has again done an excellent job with this release, including both a Blu-Ray and standard DVD in the package.  The special features are significant and include a 28-minute discussion of the film by Michael J. Koven.  Koven is very knowledgeable and is able to shed a great deal of light on the film and its place in the pantheon of giallo films.  The discussion is very interesting and enjoyable.  Genre critic and analyst Kat Ellinger provides a 20-minute video essay that is also extremely well done.  There is a fabulous audio interview with Fulci himself that lasts 33 minutes, as well as several other interviews, including a 30-minutecareer-spanning interview with Florinda Bolkan as well as with crew members who discuss their memories of making the film and of Fulci as well.  Finally, there is an audio commentary with giallo expert Troy Howarth.  Howarth is entertaining and I always enjoy his commentaries, though he tends to discuss statistics and minutiae that even I don’t care about, like the career of each person who dubbed the voice of every character in the film.  Sometimes he goes too deep into the careers of these folks but otherwise it’s a pleasant commentary track.  And, like each Arrow release, the first printing comes with a booklet with new writing on the film.

Even those viewers who aren’t fans of the director and consider him a talentless hack should try this film.  It just may give you a new appreciation for the filmmaker that was Lucio Fulci.  You can purchase the film at Amazon or directly from Arrow Video at http://www.arrowfilms.co.uk/category/usa/.

Win Passes To The Advance Screening Of SUBURBICON In St. Louis

Matt Damon, Julianne Moore, Oscar Isaac and Noah Jupe star in director George Clooney’s new film, SUBURBICON.

Suburbicon is a peaceful, idyllic suburban community with affordable homes and manicured lawns …the perfect place to raise a family, and in the summer of 1959, the Lodge family is doing just that. But the tranquil surface masks a disturbing reality, as husband and father Gardner Lodge (Matt Damon) must navigate the town’s dark underbelly of betrayal, deceit, and violence. This is a tale of very flawed people making very bad choices. This is Suburbicon.

The film is written by Academy Award® winners Joel & Ethan Coen (No Country For Old Men), and Clooney & Academy Award® winner Grant Heslov (Argo).

SUBURBICON opens on October 27, 2017.

WAMG invites you to enter for the chance to win TWO (2) seats to the advance screening of SUBURBICON on October 24 at 7:00 pm in the St. Louis area.

ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:

Which 1981 comedy starred John Belushi, Dan Aykroyd and Cathy Moriarty?

TO ENTER, ADD YOUR NAME, ANSWER AND EMAIL IN OUR COMMENTS SECTION BELOW.

OFFICIAL RULES:

1. YOU MUST BE IN THE ST. LOUIS AREA THE DAY OF THE SCREENING.

2. No purchase necessary. A pass does not guarantee a seat at a screening. Seating is on a first-come, first served basis. The theater is overbooked to assure a full house.

Visit the official site : suburbiconmovie.com

Rated R

Photo Credit: Hilary Bronwyn Gayle © 2017 Paramount Pictures. All rights reserved.

A Look Back at THE EXORCIST – Screening This Weekend at Marcus Wehrenberg Theatres


Article by Jake Billingsley

William Friedkin’s The Exorcist is the third film in Marcus Wehrenberg Theatre’s Friday night scare series. The film will be shown October 19-21, and there will be one screening each night at 10 PM. Admission is only $5. For​ ​more​ ​details​ ​and​ ​a​ ​list​ ​of participating​ ​theaters,​ ​go​ ​HERE


William Peter Blatty’s novel, The Exorcist, served William Friedkin a beacon of horror opportunity that still shines 44 years later. Blatty’s 1971 novel displays the exorcism of Roland Doe, a pseudonym for a boy, which happened in St. Louis. Friedkin adapts the film nearly two years later with Blatty’s screenplay. However, The Exorcist isn’t Friedkin’s first great film. He won the Academy Award for Best Picture the previous year for The French Connection. The Exorcist is the film he is most remembered for; Friedkin gets another Best Picture nomination, the first for a horror film, but doesn’t win. A horror film getting a Best Picture nomination is unheard of today, let alone 44 years ago. The Exorcist is considered by many to be the greatest horror film ever made. This opinion seems to be dwindling amongst recent generations. The younger moviegoers have argued that Friedkin’s film doesn’t hold up today; I disagree.


With the recent success of It, The Exorcist has finally been dethroned from the top box office spot inside the horror genre. The Exorcist grossed an international high at just over $440 million in 1973, and Stephen King’s novel adaptation has made $630 million worldwide. While inflation isn’t factored into the comparison between the two, there is still impressive box office numbers coming in for horror films today. People are never going to get tired of being scared. Friedkin once said, “People only go to movies for three reasons, to laugh, cry, or be frightened.” He followed that with, “There are only three reasons to make a movie, to make people laugh, to make them cry, or to frighten them.” The Exorcist will make some laugh today, but I will wager in the direction of the tears and fears that have plagued moviegoers for over four decades.


So what is different about Friedkin’s masterwork? Like It, The Exorcist was a film that audiences flocked to. The difference is that nowadays we know what we are getting, but many moviegoers in 1973 didn’t know what they were getting into. The Exorcist is a film that exploits a different style of filmmaking; this is true for the horror genre in particular. Friedkin adopts a documentarian approach to this film, and that’s why the movie is traumatically memorable. Do we care about Regan as she progresses into her devilish state? Do we care about what happens to the priests in the end? Do we care about the characters at all or are we hypnotized by the horrific events that take place? This film is a spiritual character study that brings us to the common recognition of how evil our world can be. It is hard to feel an emotional connection to subject matter that is so dark. All you have to do is sit back and watch. The film will take care of the rest.

Win TYLER PERRY’S BOO 2! A MADEA HALLOWEEN Passes And Prizepack

Opening on October 20th in theaters is TYLER PERRY’S BOO 2! A MADEA HALLOWEEN!

To celebrate the opening, WAMG is giving away Run-Of-Engagement passes, DVD’s and T-shirts prizepacks!

For a chance to win, leave your name and email in our comments section.

OFFICIAL RULES:

  1. YOU MUST BE A US RESIDENT. PRIZE WILL ONLY BE SHIPPED TO US ADDRESSES. NO P.O. BOXES. NO DUPLICATE ADDRESSES.
  2. WINNERS WILL BE CHOSEN FROM ALL QUALIFYING ENTRIES.

No purchase necessary.

PG-13 For sexual references, drug content, language and some horror images.

Visit the official site: http://www.boo.movie/

From L to R: Inanna Sarkis as “Gabriella,” Mike Tornabene as “Dino,” Yousef Erakat as “Jonathan,” Lexy Panterra as “Leah” and Diamond White as “Tiffany” in Tyler Perry’s Boo! 2 A Madea Halloween. Photo by Chip Bergmann.

THE MEYEROWITZ STORIES (NEW AND SELECTED) – The Review

THE MEYEROWITZ STORIES (NEW AND SELECTED) is currently streaming on Netflix

Review by Stephen Tronicek

The first character that we’re introduced to in THE MEYEROWITZ STORIES (NEW AND SELECTED), Noah Baumbach’s new best movie, ever is Danny (Adam Sandler) who feels like a pretty good representation of the film itself. As he drives around the streets of New York City, looking for a parking spot, his college-age daughter in tow, you see kindness in almost all of his actions. A need to please and connect with the young woman about to go off to college. And yet, every once in awhile, he snaps. Maybe it is the inability to actually find a parking spot, maybe it is the festering disconnect that he is having with his separated wife, maybe it is everything, but when push comes to shove Danny Meyerowitz screams f-words at drivers who can’t hear him when he doesn’t get his way.

How all of this ties into the thematic material of this incredible film is that each character is a microcosm of what the film is attempting. As the Meyerowitz’s come together, in a way that seems almost coincidental, and clash with each other about life, love, and family, the film itself keeps the audience from an arm’s length from the truth. For as much of the plot of the film is based in dialogue, none of the dialogue is very direct at all. Much like Baumbach’s other films, the characters here talk a lot, but they dance around the burning core of the film’s emotionality, never really spelling out what is wrong with them until a paramount moment that forces them too.

This makes for some really engaging drama in that the audience is constantly forced to decipher what anybody is actually saying, a balance that Baumbach has stricken before. What keeps all of it from becoming vapid is the both Baumbach’s direction and his editor seem perfectly matched. Part of the reason why the audience has to be engaged in the conversation is that Baumbach shoots his conversations in single shots and double shots, and cuts between them extremely quickly. This type of editing in effect is the film telling us that these people are talking over each other so quickly that even if they attempted to sit down and figure out what was actually wrong with all of them, they’d just end up putting each other down. The film developing the characters to a point of talking to each other is a great arc and the editing expertly evolves with this.

Baumbach’s talent of casting actors is honed to a fine point here, especially with the casting of Adam Sandler. Sandler has produced and starred in some truly horrendous works over the past few years, since his flagship turn in Punch Drunk Love, but he’s so good in The Meyerowitz Stories that you can’t help but identify the film as an interesting case study of his talents as an actor. Sandler is playing a Sandler character, an oafish man, seemingly beat down by life, that has a bit of a funny voice affectation, but every time he seems to get too close to what makes his other characters and films not work (i.e. not realizing that gross-out jokes, while not being necessary without merit do tend to exacerbate your tone and therefore your audience), he’s restrained back down to Earth, making this one of his best performances and also one of the best of the year. Ben Stiller, Dustin Hoffman, and Emma Thompson all show up as other Meyerowitz players and while all three have been criminally underutilized in the past couple of years, each of them also provides some of the best performances of the year, especially Hoffman, who hasn’t been this good in a long time.

The Meyerowitz Stories is about a family developing into a functioning group, and in that way, it seems the perfect companion to Baumbach’s previous more nihilistic work (especially The Squid and the Whale). People come together and finally, after years of ignoring each other, find a way to get along. Much like the Sandler case, one can’t help but view the film by way of evolution in the artist’s oeuvre, a logical step towards optimism that is so joyous and comforting that you can’t help but feel good about life.

5 out of 5

6 BELOW: MIRACLE ON THE MOUNTAIN – Review

Review by Jake Billingsley

Momentum Pictures will release 6 BELOW: MIRACLE ON THE MOUNTAIN in select theaters and On Demand and Digital HD on October 13th.

6 Below: Miracle on the Mountain is about as predictable as its title. Director Scott Waugh (Need for Speed, Act of Valor) takes us into the world of Eric LeMarque (Josh Hartnett), a former pro hockey star that lost his way. While we gauge our eyes upon the true events that shape LeMarque’s story, we inherit the central focus of his drug problem. We learn that all he has is his addiction, which comes with flashbacks that are almost just as bad; the one positive thing he has is his snowboard. Although, all three of these things eventually bring Eric to a peak of deeper isolation. He gets stranded in the Sierra Nevada mountains; what a shocker right? Eric’s mom Susan, played by Mira Sorvino, is almost as troubled as he is. Sorvino has a limited role in the film, but she is good when she’s on screen.

Eric LeMarque spends 8 days stranded in the Sierra Nevada’s. He gets by on one bite of a protein bar and the water he stores in a plastic bag that previously carried his meth. He also carries a dead phone and a radio; his snowboard is the only thing that holds him up at times. This film isn’t about plausibility. It is about the struggles and regrets of a man that is completely distant from everything he needs. On his journey through the mountains, he searches within himself through countless flashbacks, survival agony, and withdrawal. He has nothing in the mountains but the freezing clothes on his back and the haunting regrets from his past. He has to find himself as he tries to find his way back.

The film follows Eric well. Waugh takes his time on Eric’s suffering. When he tracks him through the snow, zones in on him snowboarding, or closes in on his shivering face, Waugh makes us feel how cold the mountains are. He also makes us want to go on a ski trip. No matter how inspiring this story is supposed to be, I’m afraid it’s not. I feel the isolation of Eric in the mountains, but I never feel the need to care. Why should I care when the narrative offers no expositional point of view? As I find out more about LeMarque, I care less. I barely cared at all.

The title speaks for itself. Would you go see a film, for the first time, when you already know the outcome? It is supposed to be an inspiring story of survival, some will see it that way, but some will view it as a waste of time. I would have preferred a documentary with the real Eric LeMarque; he is pictured at the end of the film giving a speech to youth hockey players. LeMarque is a motivational speaker now and it fits him well. The only problem is that he had more to say in one minute than Waugh did in 95.

I wouldn’t recommend the film, but I would recommend the story. It is a life and death experience that serves LeMarque a life changing diet of enlightenment. While moviegoers won’t get that, many will be curious to hear him speak about it; I highly encourage you to listen.

 

A Look Back at THE SKID KID – Filmed in Union, Missouri

Article by Mark Longden

“The Skid Kid” is a masterpiece. Although I don’t often do this, here’s a trailer for it, produced for a 2015 showing at Cinefamily in LA (undoubtedly, the original release never had a trailer), and if you don’t immediately fall in love with it, I’m not sure we can be friends any more.

This is part of our “Made In STL” season, which is really the “Made In STL” season of the St Louis Video Society, the fortnightly event where cult movie connoisseurs get together and watch some locally-produced gem. We’ve had “Justice: Ninja Style”, two early movies from Eric Stanze, and “Fatal Exam” (well, they can’t all be winners). There’s plenty more to come, so if you’re reading this and want to come along, get in touch with the Society on Facebook.

 

This movie features two actors who’d go on to real, serious careers. One much more than the other, I’ll admit, but impressive nontheless. Starring as the Skid Kid himself is one Gary Wolf, who’s been in “The Nice Guys” and has lots of bit-part work; and as his romantic rival for the beautiful Stephanie, Scott Wolf. Yes, the Scott Wolf from “Party of Five”, “Perception” and “The Night Shift”, one of the more dependable TV actors of the last 20 years, right at the very beginning of his career. They’re brothers, and in case you were wondering why Stephanie had zero chemistry with either of them, she’s played by their sister Jessica.

One might also wonder why the Wolf kids found themselves in Union, Missouri. Trying to think of something polite to say about it, it looks quite clean, but it’s a small town in the middle of nowhere and given the Wolf kids appear to have grown up in Boston, with Scott going to high school in New Jersey and college in Washington DC, it’s a puzzler. We do know a little about the origin of the movie, though, thanks to an interview with director Glen Gruner done by the great people at www.trashnite.com – he shot a short film on super-8 film as a college project in the early 80s, and in 1989 someone suggested he turn it into a feature, so he took his super-8 camera and did it (the reason there are no interior shots is because super-8 works much better in natural light, take it inside and it gets really grainy). Every frame of the original student film is in the finished product, too, which I like.

So, one day high school everyman Scooter (who’s apparently a distant relative of the famous director, having the surname Spielberg) is walking home from school when he finds a pair of black boots in the middle of a country road – we saw the original owner of them die after being hit by a car – and realises they’re effectively magic boots. So he puts them on and becomes the Skid Kid! This mostly involves sitting down and, via the magic of stop-motion, speeding along the ground. That his boots get worn out but the ass of his jeans doesn’t is one of the many magical things about this wonderful movie. Oh yes, and they’re powered with RC Cola!

 

Union is a crime-ridden hell-hole so the Skid Kid wants to clean it up, and the cops want to stop him. He doesn’t tell his girlfriend about his alter ego, but the cops figure it out remarkably quickly and are just waiting to catch him wearing his outfit before they pounce.

Apart from the clearly bonkers premise, this could be any one of a hundred ultra-low-budget, vaguely genre related movies produced in the early days of home video. But what sets it apart is its sense of humour (and, you know, having a couple of decent actors in main roles certainly helped too). Because continuity was almost impossible in a movie made over the course of two years with zero budget, and because he knew the kids who were its main audience wouldn’t care, Gruner had a laugh with it, as Skid Kid’s outfit changes, sometimes subtly and sometimes not, in the middle of scenes. Ten different Skid Kids were hired (hence the rather odd credit list for the character) but Gary Wolf was the only one who stuck with it – plus, if your main actor isn’t around but you get the chance to shoot some footage, just put the outfit on anyone who’s roughly the same size!

There’s some classic “Shoot the Parade”, the low budget film trick where they film some small town’s big event and subtly insert themselves into it. Here, it’s a biking carnival, featuring kids on Big Wheels and then teenagers on mountain bikes – the number of limbs that get run over in the free-for-all is horrifying to my 2017 eyes, though. Health and safety, people! Talking of bicycles, while at the carnival, Gruner decided he wanted a scene of a kid doing a really long wheelie to insert in a few scenes. One local volunteered, they went on a back road, shot a really long wheelie, and while Gruner got his name at the time, he’s no idea who the kid was (a kid who almost certainly never watched, or perhaps even knew about, the finished movie).

 

It’s just delightfully home made, though, with Gruner doing almost all the work (about three-quarters of the credits are fake, to make it look higher-budget than it was – Gruner contacted his friends and asked them if they’d mind their names being used as make-up supervisor, or whatever) and his family acting in a bunch of scenes. His mother is the TV news reporter, for instance. Gary Wolf brought Scott to the set, and got him his one scene, so it might even be “The Skid Kid” that persuaded Scott to give the whole acting thing a try – Gruner says that while the Wolf kids were great to work with, he’d no idea the stars they’d become. There’s a guy in a Halloween mask as an apparently real character, a local fraternity appearing as thugs who just happened to be the nearest frat to where they were filming…there are dozens of little stories like this that contribute to making it the gem it is.

I normally finish these segments off with “good luck with finding a copy, though”, but I don’t have to in this instance, as it’s available on Youtube. The sole distribution it ever got was through Gruner himself, who’d mail out VHS tapes to anyone who asked for $20 a pop, and made a nice profit from it; no special edition blu-ray yet, sadly. But now we can all see it and revel in what is a hidden classic of the video-shop era, made with love and dedication.

 

Rating: thumbs up

 

Win Passes To The Advance Screening Of GOODBYE CHRISTOPHER ROBIN In St. Louis

GOODBYE CHRISTOPHER ROBIN gives a rare glimpse into the relationship between beloved children’s author A. A. Milne (Domhnall Gleeson) and his son Christopher Robin (Will Tilston), whose toys inspired the magical world of Winnie-the-Pooh. Along with his mother Daphne (Margot Robbie), and his nanny Olive (Kelly Macdonald), Christopher Robin and his family are swept up in the international success of the books; the enchanting tales bringing hope and comfort to England after the First World War. But with the eyes of the world on Christopher Robin, what will the cost be to the family?

Directed by Simon Curtis (WOMAN IN GOLD, MY WEEK WITH MARILYN), the film opens in St. Louis on October 20th.

WAMG invites you to enter for the chance to win TWO (2) seats to the advance screening of GOODBYE CHRISTOPHER ROBIN on October 17 at 7:00 pm in the St. Louis area.

Answer the following:

What are the titles of the two volumes that A.A. Milne wrote for his son, Christopher Robin, about his teddy bear known as Winnie-the-Pooh?

TO ENTER, ADD YOUR ANSWER, NAME AND EMAIL IN OUR COMMENTS SECTION BELOW.

OFFICIAL RULES:

1. YOU MUST BE IN THE ST. LOUIS AREA THE DAY OF THE SCREENING.

2. No purchase necessary. A pass does not guarantee a seat at a screening. Seating is on a first-come, first served basis. The theater is overbooked to assure a full house.

WEBSITE: www.goodbyechristopherrobin.com

RATING: PG – thematic elements, some bullying, war images and brief language

Will Tilston in the film GOODBYE CHRISTOPHER ROBIN. Photo by David Appleby. © 2017 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation All Rights Reserved
Margot Robbie, Will Tilston, Domhnall Gleeson and Richard Clifford in the film GOODBYE CHRISTOPHER ROBIN. Photo by David Appleby. © 2017 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation All Rights Reserved

A Look Back at A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET – Screening This Weekend at Marcus Wehrenberg Theatres

Article by Jake Billingsley

Wes​ ​Craven’s​ ​A​ ​Nightmare​ ​on​ ​Elm​ ​Street​ ​is​ ​the​ ​second​ ​film​ ​in​ ​Marcus​ ​Wehrenberg Theatre’s​ ​friday​ ​night​ ​series.​ ​The​ ​film​ ​will​ ​be​ ​shown​ ​October​ ​12-14,​ ​and​ ​there​ ​will​ ​be​ ​one screening​ ​each​ ​night​ ​at​ ​10​ ​PM.​ ​Admission​ ​is​ ​only​ ​$5.​ ​For​ ​more​ ​details​ ​and​ ​a​ ​list​ ​of participating​ ​theaters,​ ​go​ ​HERE


Wes Craven’s hit slasher film A Nightmare on Elm Street was a fresh take on horror through a fearsome, distinct character. The comics will address him commonly as the “Springwood Killer,” but in the films we see him as a striped sweater wearing serial killer. Freddy Krueger is a burnt, psychopathic, unrelenting, child killer that hungers for revenge; in total, he stays hungry for 9 films. Craven’s genius is evident with the concept he explores throughout the original film. If you fall asleep, you are going to die. How are you going to die? A man with 4 razor sharp claws latched to a glove, a popular costume accessory for this Halloween season, is going to chase you and catch you; freddy catching you is inevitable, unless you wake up. With a budget of only $1.8 million, the film was a major hit. The total domestic gross New Line Cinema arrives at with “A Nightmare on Elm Street” is just over $25.5 million. How could the franchise stop there? It never seems like the sequels are better than the originals when it comes to films in a horror series. When it comes to debating the films in this series, Johnny Depp catalyzes the win. Who doesn’t want to see Johnny Depp get torn apart and swallowed by the claws of Krueger? Does his blood have to fly from the depths of his mattress showering the ceiling? Of course it does. Johnny Depp is the star that radiates off the cast list nearly 33 years later. Born in 1963, Depp landed on the silver screen 21 years later in Craven’s slasher. It was his first role, and he can thank Craven’s teenage daughter at the time for that; she had to choose between Depp and another actor to play Glen, but chose Depp because of her attraction towards him. Some may not be surprised by her choice, but may be surprised as to how Depp reached auditions. Depp originally moved out to Hollywood as an aspiring rock musician, but his friend Nicolas Cage persuaded him to take on Glen’s part for some extra cash. I think it’s safe to say we are all glad he didn’t turn his back on acting. If you missed The Shining last weekend, then this is the perfect time to get a good scare in. A Nightmare on Elm Street is a classic 80’s horror flick that will not disappoint. It doesn’t matter what taste you have when it comes to movies; if you go watch Freddy Krueger, you will either close your eyes, laugh, scream, or just be flat out entertained. $5 is the perfect price for whichever one fits you.

THE SLAYER – The Blu Review


Review by Roger Carpenter

My guess is that all true movie lovers have a list of films which remain unavailable on a decent DVD or Blu-Ray release and for which they are waiting for some company to pick up and give it a nice release.  This was true for me regarding The Slayer.  I first saw the film in the early-to-mid-eighties on a VHS double-bill with Fred Olen Ray’s Scalps.  Both films were pretty terrible quality but both were fun in their own way and I duped both and kept them for a long time.  Scalps has long since been on DVD (and recently Blu-Ray), and I have long owned a copy of that film which I still pull out from time to time and watch again.  But my dupe of The Slayer died decades ago and I hadn’t viewed the film in a long time…really, too long.  Along comes Arrow Video USA.  They have been thrilling and pleasing me for several years now, what with their official Blu-Ray releases of some genuinely hard-to-find gems such as Brian Yuzna’s Society, the little-known but oft-bootlegged Blood Rage, the nearly-impossible-to-find The Mutilator, the first legitimate North American release of Maestro Bava’s Caltiki, and many more.  It seems that every other month Arrow announces the release of another film on my “need to own” list.  And I haven’t been disappointed by any of these releases yet.

The Slayer was a low-budget quickie produced by first-time filmmakers in 1980 and picked up by an independent releasing company in 1982.  It saw a very spotty theatrical release before heading straight to video where it quickly became a popular video rental.  It was released at a time when Britain was going through its video nasty scare and was subsequently identified by that country as a video nasty, though it was never actually prosecuted for such.  And if these weren’t enough indignities for the film to suffer, it was apparently cut down (though not the gore) to fit onto a VHS tape along with Scalps, so the film has never really seen an uncut release.  And finally, the film was simply very dark and hard to watch simply because many scenes seemed to occur in pitch blackness.  I’ve since learned—thanks to the special features on this disc—the reason for this was because the distribution company never had the film color-corrected, instead, opting to release it before final processing.  So now, with a huge thanks to Arrow, we finally get to see The Slayer completely uncut and color-corrected, and what a difference this makes!


Summarily dismissed by critics as just another early-eighties cheapie slasher film, a new generation of horror film fans can now see the film for what it was intended.  The story revolves around Kay (Sarah Kendall), a painter who has lately been producing scary, surreal works of art that have taken a toll on her finances as well as her marriage.  The source of these paintings is a series of dreams that have haunted the young woman since she was a child and her kitten was found drowned in the bathroom.  While her adulthood has been fairly stable, the dreams have returned and seem to be increasing in frequency.  So, her doctor husband, along with her brother and his wife, have planned a week-long vacation on a secluded and totally uninhabited island.  The island is so far removed from civilization they have to rent a small aircraft to drop them on the beach and then hike inland to the sole remaining beach house in existence.  Kay is, of course, apprehensive of the trip as she recognizes the beach house and the island as locations she has painted from her dreams.  The others, typically, are dismissive of her worries and so off the foursome goes to be dropped onto this secluded island (actually Tybee Island, Georgia).

It doesn’t take long for Kay’s husband to disappear and for the others to separate so they can search for him.  Kay discovers his headless body hanging from the feet in an abandoned building near the beach house and is so distraught the other couple give her some sleeping pills.  Convinced the death was caused by something she dreamed, Kay tries hard to stay awake, even burning herself with a cigarette.  Eventually, however, the drugs overcome her will and she falls asleep, unleashing something terrible upon her brother and sister-in-law.


While there are some typical slasher-like tropes in The Slayer, I would disagree it should be lumped into that particular sub-genre.  While most critics simply saw the premise of four people being picked off by a mysterious killer as a typical slasher film story, there are many other characteristics that elevate this picture from being just another slasher film.  First, our four protagonists are all full-fledged adults.  They have real lives, real marital struggles, and real careers.  There are no horny teenagers to help equate sex and death, no silly characters for comic relief, no prototypical, virginal Final Girl.  And despite one very brief glimpse of profile nudity, sex isn’t mentioned in the film.  Second, the killer may—or may not—be real.  And it may—or may not—be human.  Lensed four full years before A Nightmare on Elm Street as well as Dreamscape, The Slayer is an early example of a film that introduced modern audiences to the idea of dreams that could bleed into reality (and no—I’m not counting Cronenberg’s The Brood here).  And, more than just a simple “dream it and it becomes reality” concept, the film remains open-ended allowing the viewer to determine whether Kay is unhinged and killing her friends or whether a monster is truly capable of being conjured simply by a dream.  The body count is also relatively low compared to other slasher films of the day, with only five deaths in 90 minutes.

This last statement may be the only criticism I’ve heard about The Slayer, and that is that some viewers think the movie is slow.  In fact, this idea is brought up numerous times by the filmmakers and others in the various extras on the disc.  It is true that, aside from one quick killing early in the film, the death scenes don’t occur until the second half of the film.  But The Slayer has tons of atmosphere which hearkens back to the “old dark house” films of the 1920’s that I find plenty entertaining in and of themselves.  There is a creepy guy that keeps appearing at odd times who is used as a red herring.  He isn’t truly necessary but does add to the overall eerie feel to the film.  But once Kay’s husband is offed, things pick up and the killings occur in more rapid succession:  death by boat oar; by fish hooks; by decapitation; by pitchfork.  Not the bloodiest I’ve seen, but gory enough to be placed on Britain’s Video Nasty list, a quality recommendation if ever there was one.


Ultimately, I find The Slayer to be a more violent version of an “old dark house” tale than a slasher film.  But however one defines the film, it is simply thrilling for it to be so readily available after nearly four decades in cinematic purgatory.  Arrow Video has seen fit to provide us the uncut version in a brand new 4K scan from the original negative, thus ensuring viewers are seeing the film in the best possible quality.  While there is still plenty of grain, as befits a low-budget quickie from the eighties, the quality is remarkable, allowing many fans the opportunity to really see the film for the first time.  Typical of Arrow, this Blu-Ray and standard DVD combo comes with plenty of extras to enlighten and entertain the ardent Slayer fan, including a nearly hour-long “making-of” documentary featuring many of the primary cast and crew members; a 13-minute featurette revisiting the original locations on Tybee Island; a ten-minute still gallery; and theatrical trailer.

But Arrow has included plenty of other fantastic extras, including an audio commentary with writer/director J.S. Cardone, actress Carol Kottenbrook, and production executive Eric Weston.  A second commentary track is provided with the slasher podcast ensemble The Hysteria Continues, and a third track includes an informative and entertaining 45-minute interview with composer Robert Folk (perhaps most famous for his Police Academy scores) followed by isolated score selections.  And finally, a fourth track is included, which is a recording of the audience reaction at the Tybee Post Theater, the recently-restored movie theater that was used as an abandoned ruin in the actual film.  You can listen to the audience reaction as the film is played, along with an introduction by various people as well as a 17-minute post-screening Q&A with a crewmember from the original production.  And finally, with the initial pressing only, a collector’s booklet with new liner notes by writer Lee Gambin will also be included.


For those who were true believers back in the day—or for those who have never seen the film—this is a deluxe package for a hard-to-find film which is a true classic of independent horror cinema.  It’s worth every penny!  The Slayer has just been released and can be found through Amazon or directly through Arrow Video at http://www.arrowfilms.co.uk/category/usa/.