Win A Family Four-Pack To The St. Louis Advance Screening Of DR. SEUSS’ THE GRINCH

ILLUMINATION PRESENTS DR. SEUSS’ THE GRINCH opening in theaters November 9. WAMG has your free passes to see the film early!

For their eighth fully animated feature, Illumination and Universal Pictures present The Grinch, based on Dr. Seuss’ beloved holiday classic.  The Grinch tells the story of a cynical grump who goes on a mission to steal Christmas, only to have his heart changed by a young girl’s generous holiday spirit.  Funny, heartwarming and visually stunning, it’s a universal story about the spirit of Christmas and the indomitable power of optimism.

Academy Award® nominee Benedict Cumberbatch lends his voice to the infamous Grinch, who lives a solitary life inside a cave on Mt. Crumpet with only his loyal dog for company.  With a cave rigged with inventions and contraptions for his day-to-day needs, the Grinch only sees his neighbors in Who-ville when he runs out of food.

Each year at Christmas they disrupt his tranquil solitude with their increasingly bigger, brighter and louder celebrations.  When the Whos declare they are going to make Christmas three times bigger this year, the Grinch realizes there is only one way for him to gain some peace and quiet: he must steal Christmas.  To do so, he decides he will pose as Santa Claus on Christmas Eve, even going so far as to trap a lackadaisical misfit reindeer to pull his sleigh.

Meanwhile, down in Who-ville, Cindy-Lou Who—a young girl overflowing with holiday cheer—plots with her gang of friends to trap Santa Claus as he makes his Christmas Eve rounds so that she can thank him for help for her overworked single mother.  As Christmas approaches, however, her good-natured scheme threatens to collide with the Grinch’s more nefarious one.  Will Cindy-Lou achieve her goal of finally meeting Santa Claus?  Will the Grinch succeed in silencing the Whos’ holiday cheer once and for all?

Find out, Christmas season 2018.  www.grinchmovie.com

Enter for your chance to win a Family Four Pack of passes to the advance screening on TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 7:00pm.

Answer the Following:

What is the name of the Grinch’s dog?

Add you name, answer and email in our comments section below.

NO PURCHASE REQUIRED. A pass does not guarantee a seat at a screening. Seating is on a first-come, first served basis. The theater is overbooked to assure a full house.

Rated PG

Get Tickets: https://www.fandango.com/thegrinch

Michio Yamamoto’s BLOODTHIRSTY TRILOGY – The Blu Review


Review by Roger Carpenter

Most true horror fans know the gothic excesses of Hammer horror in their heyday (late 1950’s through the 1960’s) are a high point of worldwide genre cinema.  Many fans may even know that Hammer released alternate versions of many of their films in Japan with extra bits of gore and nudity.  This points to the fact that Hammer horror films were quite popular in Japan, as they were in the U.K. and the U.S.  In fact, they were popular enough for Japanese director Michio Yamamoto to try his hand at producing a homegrown version of Hammer-influenced vampires.  This series of three films have become known as The Bloodthirsty Trilogy.

In 1970’s The Legacy of Dracula (also known as The Vampire Doll), Keiko and her friend go in search of her missing brother when the brother visits his girlfriend Yuko.  In 1971’s follow-up, Lake of Dracula, Dr. Saeki investigates the deaths of several young women at a lakeside resort.  His discoveries lead him to believe a vampire is on the prowl, so he sets out to kill the creature.  Finally, 1974’s Evil of Dracula sees a new teacher being hired at a private school for girls only to discover he is being groomed to take over as principal of the school—but first he must become a vampire.

Fans of Hammer horror or of Italian gothic cinema of the 1960’s are simply going to love these films.  All the trappings of gothic horror abound:  ancient, creepy villas; cobwebbed secret chambers; dank, musty cellars; eerie characters; and an abundance of atmosphere.  At a time when Japanese cinema was testing the censors with sex, nudity, and gore, these films feel like quaint throwbacks to early cinema instead of early 1970’s genre entries.  Those of us who still enjoy the 1960’s Italian gothic chillers from the likes of Freda, Margheriti, and Bava, will enjoy these films immensely; others, perhaps expecting something more outlandish, will likely be disappointed.


All three films are shortish, running between 82 and 87 minutes. If there’s a drawback, it’s the tendency for lengthy bits of exposition in between action set pieces.  Indeed, the films may be a bit too dialogue heavy but, while I noticed this, it didn’t really detract from the general creepy atmosphere of the films.  Another surprise is just how tame the films are.  There is very little actual exploitative material across the three films, something of an anomaly when discussing Japanese genre fare of this time period.  In The Vampire Doll there is only one questionable scene, where a character’s neck is opened up in graphic close-up followed by a medium shot of a long-lasting arterial spray.  This is all the more shocking for the staid atmosphere the film has maintained through the entirety of its running time, and surprises the viewer for its graphic absurdity.  Lake of Dracula continues the trend of eerie atmospherics instead of exploitative violence. It isn’t until Evil of Dracula that any nudity is revealed, and that is quite brief, along with a couple of short bloody scenes as well.  Overall, these films are quite tame in comparison to other Japanese genre films of the time.

That, however, should not deter horror fans from trying these films out.  What they may lack in the areas of sex and violence is made up in spades with chilling atmosphere and eroticism.  Just like the Hammer classics, the male vampires are dashingly handsome, similar to the late, great Christopher Lee, while the women are generally very easy on the eyes.  The films are quite westernized, as might befit a film in the gothic style.  We aren’t in feudal Japan with its traditional wood homes with bed mats and sliding bamboo scrims. These homes are very western.  They are large, with high, vaulted ceilings and huge, second floor halls and banisters, with staircases on either side.  They come with large dining halls and equally large libraries, and outside grounds so wide it would make the Queen of England blush.  It is obvious Yamamoto tried to replicate the bourgeois trappings of Hammer films.


Other than the occasional tediousness of overlong exposition, the only other fault I found with the films were some obvious plot inconsistencies.  An example, in The Vampire Doll, is the deaf-mute servant (an obvious riff on the Renfield character) who is…well, deaf and mute.  Except he has an uncanny ability to “hear” his mistresses’ words, even with his back turned, throughout the film.  There are several of these glaring types of errors, but I found them fun to note and to laugh at rather then something that detracted from the films—perhaps an indication I’ve seen far too many B-films in my life.  Simply put, though, I didn’t mind dismissing these errors because I was enjoying myself far too much to let them bother me.

Arrow Video has released this obscure trilogy of westernized vampire films from Japan in an extremely nice package.  The Blu-Ray discs were transferred from original film elements and both picture and sound are excellent.  The first disc contains The Vampire Doll as well as a new video appraisal by film critic Kim Newman.  Disc two contains the second and third films in the trilogy as well as trailers for all three films.  If there is any criticism of this package, it would be for the small amount of additional content included with the set.  These films scream for special features that would place them in better context.  Perhaps their relative obscurity made it difficult for Arrow to produce such features.  Regardless, having the films in high definition is a gift itself, so I won’t complain too much.

You can purchase the film directly from Arrow Video at http://www.arrowfilms.co.uk/category/usa/ or from Amazon.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Win Passes To The St. Louis Advance Screening Of J.J. Abrams OVERLORD

With only hours until D-Day, a team of American paratroopers drop into Nazi-occupied France to carry out a mission that’s crucial to the invasion’s success. Tasked with destroying a radio transmitter atop a fortified church, the desperate soldiers join forces with a young French villager to penetrate the walls and take down the tower. But, in a mysterious Nazi lab beneath the church, the outnumbered G.I.s come face-to-face with enemies unlike any the world has ever seen. From producer J.J. Abrams, OVERLORD is a thrilling, pulse-pounding action adventure with a twist.

OVERLORD is in theatres and IMAX on November 9, 2018

WAMG has your free passes to the advance screening of OVERLORD in St. Louis.

Date: November, 7pm in the St. Louis area.

ENTER FOR YOUR CHANCE TO WIN A PASS GOOD FOR TWO!

Answer the Following:

What is the name of the pseudo-science that the Nazis wanted to use to implement global “racial purity”?

Add you name, answer and email in our comments section below.

NO PURCHASE REQUIRED. A pass does not guarantee a seat at a screening. Seating is on a first-come, first served basis. The theater is overbooked to assure a full house.

Rated R for strong bloody violence, disturbing images, language, and brief sexual content.

Visit the official site: overlordmovie.com

Jovan Adepo as Boyce in the film, OVERLORD by Paramount Pictures

Win A Family Four-Pack Of Passes To The St. Louis Advance Screening Of DISNEY’S NUTCRACKER AND THE FOUR REALMS

WAMG has your free passes to Disney’s 2018 holiday feature film “The Nutcracker and the Four Realms,” opening November 2nd.

ll Clara (Mackenzie Foy) wants is a key – a one-of-a-kind key that will unlock a box that holds a priceless gift. A golden thread, presented to her at godfather Drosselmeyer’s (Morgan Freeman) annual holiday party, leads her to the coveted key—which promptly disappears into a strange and mysterious parallel world. It’s there that Clara encounters a soldier named Phillip (Jayden Fowora-Knight), a gang of mice and the regents who preside over three Realms: Land of Snowflakes, Land of Flowers and Land of Sweets. Clara and Phillip must brave the ominous Fourth Realm, home to the tyrant Mother Ginger (Helen Mirren), to retrieve Clara’s key and hopefully return harmony to the unstable world. Starring Keira Knightley as the Sugar Plum Fairy, Disney’s new holiday feature film “The Nutcracker and the Four Realms” is directed by Lasse Hallström and Joe Johnston, and inspired by E.T.A. Hoffmann’s classic tale.

Enter for your chance to win a Family Four Pack of passes to the advance screening on Tuesday, October 30th, 7:00pm.

Answer the Following:

The story is about a girl who befriends a Nutcracker that comes to life on Christmas Eve and wages a battle against the evil _______________ .

Add you name, answer and email in our comments section below.

NO PURCHASE REQUIRED. A pass does not guarantee a seat at a screening. Seating is on a first-come, first served basis. The theater is overbooked to assure a full house.

Rated PG

Visit the official site: movies.disney.com/the-nutcracker-and-the-four-realms

Keira Knightley is the Sugar Plum Fairy and Mackenzie Foy is Clara in THE NUTCRACKER AND THE FOUR REALMS.

Win Passes To The St. Louis Advance Screening Of CAN YOU EVER FORGIVE ME? Starring Melissa McCarthy

In CAN YOU EVER FORGIVE ME?, Melissa McCarthy stars as Lee Israel, the best-selling celebrity biographer (and cat lover) who made her living in the 1970’s and 80’s profiling the likes of Katharine Hepburn, Tallulah Bankhead, Estee Lauder and journalist Dorothy Kilgallen. When Lee found herself unable to get published because she had fallen out of step with the marketplace, she turned her art form to deception, abetted by her loyal friend Jack (Richard E. Grant).

Opens in St. Louis on Friday November 2.

WAMG has your free passes to the advance screening of CAN YOU EVER FORGIVE ME? in St. Louis.

Date: October 29, 7pm in the St. Louis area.

ENTER FOR YOUR CHANCE TO WIN A PASS GOOD FOR TWO!

Answer the Following:

Richard E. Grant has starred in The Age Of Innocence, Bright Young Things, Gosford Park, Bram Stoker’s Dracula and Penelope. More recently he played Dr. Zander Rice in which Marvel film?

Add you name, answer and email in our comments section below.

NO PURCHASE REQUIRED. A pass does not guarantee a seat at a screening. Seating is on a first-come, first served basis. The theater is overbooked to assure a full house.

Rated R

Visit the official site: foxsearchlight.com/canyoueverforgiveme/

Melissa McCarthy as “Lee Israel” and Richard E. Grant as “Jack Hock” in the film CAN YOU EVER FORGIVE ME? Photo by Mary Cybulski. © 2018 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation All Rights Reserved

7 Things You Should Love About VENOM

© 2018 CTMG, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

By Marc Butterfield

The movie VENOM has been getting a lot of hate, despite its respectable numbers at the box office. (Global numbers to date are $461.2M)

One of Marvel’s greatest and most complex characters takes center stage as Eddie Brock (Tom Hardy) becomes the host for the alien symbiote Venom. As a journalist, Eddie has been trying to take down the notorious founder of the Life Foundation, genius Carlton Drake (Riz Ahmed) – and that obsession ruined his career and his relationship with his girlfriend, Anne Weying (Michelle Williams). Upon investigating one of Drake’s experiments, the alien Venom merges with Eddie’s body, and he suddenly has incredible new superpowers, as well as the chance to do just about whatever he wants. Twisted, dark, unpredictable, and fueled by rage, Venom leaves Eddie wrestling to control dangerous abilities that he also finds empowering and intoxicating. As Eddie and Venom need each other to get what they’re looking for, they become more and more intertwined — where does Eddie end and Venom begin?

Marvel Comics Fundamentalists say it strays too far from the original material, or just generally hate that it’s still being held captive outside of the mainstream MCU. My personal take is that Venom as a character wouldn’t function as a hero in the MCU (can you imagine Cap condoning the casual murder and cannibalism of anyone, even bad guys?).

So here is a list of 7 things that you should love about the Character and director Ruben Fleischer’s VENOM.

1. It has a good sense of humor about itself.  The symbiote even admitting that what it and Eddie Brock have in common is that they are both losers.


2. It crammed in a LOT of Venom’s past in a short time, without leaving the non-comic book fan too confused.

3. Interesting use of the characters powers…without adding powers that never existed in the comics.

4. Exploring how having two beings sharing a rather fluid new physical form might fight for dominance.

5. Eddie Brock was a self-righteous jerk, and the Symbiote was just here to help take over. Both grew beyond their original template.

6. Tom Hardy was mostly coherent, occasionally even enunciating. Perhaps an alien bonding was all he really needed.

7. An absolutely ruthless disposal of extras. The aliens ate you from the inside out if they didn’t bond. How delicious.

Photo Credit: Courtesy Sony Pictures © 2017

FIN

HORRORS OF MALFORMED MEN – The Blu Review


Review by Roger Carpenter

Just after the turn of the Twentieth Century, a new artistic movement began to sweep Japan.  Steeped in traditional works of art like sculpture and painting, this new movement, ero-guro-nansensu, or erotic-grotesque-nonsense, found its way into many other mediums as well.  So it should come as no surprise that this sensibility would eventually be captured on film as well.

Nowadays many Japanese filmmakers take this concept to the very edges of taste, filling the screen with nudity, sex, and outrageously bloody special effects, perhaps culminating with films such as Organ (1996) and Grotesque (2009).  But before the ero-guro-nansensu ideals bled over into torture porn, the original concept had more to do with eroticism and sexual corruption combined with the very Japanese taboo of malformation or deformation of the body.  Wrap all this up with a general fascination for the decadent and the bizarre, and a new movement was born.

One of the most popular purveyors of the concept was the writer Edogawa Ranpo (say it quickly and you may realize it sounds like a Japanese perversion of a certain Nineteenth Century writer of the macabre who Ranpo admired), who wrote many popular novels and short stories that are still widely read in Japan today.  His works in the ero-guro-nansensu genre are considered classics.

Filmmaker Teruo Ishii had long been a fan of Ranpo’s stories.  As is typical of Japanese filmmakers, Ishii had labored for many years as an assistant director and had moved into directing in the very strict Japanese studio system, churning out regular potboilers at the rate of six or seven films a year for quite a while.  But he scored big in 1965, with the first Abashiri Prison film, directing the original as well as nine more sequels in the ultra-popular series in just three years. Exhausted by his long hours and by having to churn out retreads of the same film over and over, Ishii first turned to ero-guro-nansensu with an eight-film series examining torture in Japan, with films such as Shogun’s Joys of Torture (1968) and The Orgies of Edo (1969). These films solidified Ishii’s status as a master of this particular genre of film, though he is still widely considered only as a “cult director” even in his native country.  When Ishii was given the opportunity to adapt an Edogawa Ranpo story, he was so excited—and afraid it would be his one and only opportunity to do so—that he took a classic Ranpo story, The Strange Tale of Panorama Island, mixed it with all his favorite bits from other Ranpo stories, and produced a powerful cocktail that are equal parts erotic, grotesque, and ridiculous.


Our tale begins in an insane asylum where the protagonist of the film, a young medical student, manages to escape captivity.  He sees a newspaper and notices a death announcement.  The dead man seems to be the medical student’s exact double.  Fascinated by this seeming doppelganger and needing a place to hide out anyway, the medical student tricks the dead man’s family into believing he has been resurrected and assumes his new identity while he investigates his doppelganger’s death. This leads him in search of his long-lost “father,” who lives on an isolated island and refuses contact with the outside world while he attempts to create his own personal utopia.  Consumed with curiosity, the medical student forces his way onto the island with a small contingent of family members and servants only to discover his father is mad and the “utopia” he has created is more like Hell on Earth…and the medical student has inadvertently stepped into a trap and now must choose to help sustain this living Hell or become a part of it himself.

True to form, Horrors of Malformed Men is equal parts eroticism, grotesquerie, and fever-dream.  Dismissed by studio execs who didn’t understand it and who were offended by the film and poorly marketed by advertisers who had no idea how to present the film, it died at the box office upon its initial release in 1969.  And, due to the Japanese considering the word “malformed” as an extremely offensive epithet, the film didn’t garner a home video release until 2017 in its home country.  Nevertheless, Ishii enthusiasts were able to see the film through festivals or video releases in other countries and its reputation as Ishii’s seminal masterwork continued to grow over the past few decades.

Without depicting any sexual activity, the film is filled with nude women, some swimming mermaid-like in the island lake, some bathing together, and others painted in various golds and silvers and dancing suggestively. The general feel of the film is certainly erotic without ever approaching the pornographic.  Likewise, there is a general sense of the grotesque, from the opening scene in an insane asylum to the wild gyrations of the master of the island to the numerous freakish, Moreau-like inhabitants of the isolated island.  Even the general concept of creating a utopia for malformed people by kidnapping people and surgically deforming them is grotesque in and of itself.  In fact, it’s pure madness.

The imagery of the film perfectly captures the ero-guro sensibilities of Taisho-era Japan.  Simply put, the film is filled with images of the erotic and grotesque that are quite captivating.  The use of color and of the musical score only serves to make the images that much more impressive.  For viewers who enjoy pure cinema, this is a feast for the senses.  If the film has any failings, it has more to do with what many may perceive as “style over substance,” namely, the lack of a linear plot.  Viewers who are patient will be rewarded at the end of the film with an explanation that, while convoluted, ties all the loose ends up quite nicely.  However, many viewers who may not be used to such loose plotting, will be frustrated with the film and may give up early on.  Indeed, the film is equally praised for its powerful imagery and score as well as reviled for the “nansensu” scripting so important for these types of films.  Westerners who enjoy knowing exactly what is going on at any moment in a story will likely hit fast-forward or simply turn the television off.  But those viewers who are a bit more open-minded will be rewarded with a film that is simply astounding through-and-through.  I haven’t seen nearly all of Ishii’s works, but I have seen quite a bit.  I like much of what I have seen but nothing comes as close to attaining the ero-guro-nansensu sensibility as perfectly as Horrors of Malformed Men.


Some viewers will be put off with the obtuseness of the scripting while others will be turned off by the grotesque images on display.  Others simply won’t understand some of what is going on—and I have to admit there were parts I had to research in order to truly understand—but as a pure cinematic experience the film is terrifically entertaining.  And for those potential viewers who have been scared off by the title, be assured that none of the images are nearly as gross or as sickening as the title seems to imply.  Yes, the images are disturbing on an emotional level, but the low-budget effects (and remember, this was in 1969) serve to lessen the impact somewhat in comparison with what 21st Century effects might be capable of.  Although also a source of contention amongst genre fans, Ishii also injects the film with two or three sequences of very broad humor that serve to lighten the mood occasionally.  While some find the insertion of nearly-slapstick humor into the film as incongruous, I actually found it well-balanced and enjoyed these sequences as much as any of the others.

Arrow Video USA has released a really stupendous package here.  The film has been restored in 2K from the original camera negative and is presented in high definition Blu-Ray.  It comes with two audio commentaries, one ported over from the DVD release over a decade ago with Mark Schilling and a new commentary with Tom Mes.  I found the Schilling commentary to be the better of the two, but both shed light on the film and give it some much-needed Western perspective.  There are several special features including an interview with the screenwriter as well as with Japanese filmmakers influenced by Ishii.  There is also some footage of Ishii in Italy while attending a career retrospective.  He is interviewed towards the end of the footage and it was nice to hear him speak about his career.  An image gallery and trailer round out the special features.  The first pressing also includes a booklet with writing by some of the best Japanese cinema experts out there, including Mes, Grady Hendrix, and Jasper Sharp.

You can purchase the film directly from Arrow Video at http://www.arrowfilms.co.uk/category/usa/ or from Amazon.

Win Passes To The Advance Screening Of BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY In St. Louis

BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY is a foot-stomping celebration of Queen, their music and their extraordinary lead singer Freddie Mercury. Freddie defied stereotypes and shattered convention to become one of the most beloved entertainers on the planet. The film traces the meteoric rise of the band through their iconic songs and revolutionary sound. They reach unparalleled success, but in an unexpected turn Freddie, surrounded by darker influences, shuns Queen in pursuit of his solo career. Having suffered greatly without the collaboration of Queen, Freddie manages to reunite with his bandmates just in time for Live Aid. While bravely facing a recent AIDS diagnosis, Freddie leads the band in one of the greatest performances in the history of rock music. Queen cements a legacy that continues to inspire outsiders, dreamers and music lovers to this day.

The film stars Rami Malek, Lucy Boynton, Gwilym Lee, Ben Hardy, Joseph Mazzello, Aidan Gillen, Tom Hollander, and Mike Myers.

BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY arrives in theaters on November 2, 2018.

WAMG has your free passes to the advance screening of BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY in St. Louis.

Date: October 23, 7pm in the St. Louis area.

ENTER FOR YOUR CHANCE TO WIN A PASS GOOD FOR TWO!

Answer the Following:

Which two movies feature Queen in its soundtrack?

Add you name, answer and email in our comments section below.

NO PURCHASE REQUIRED. A pass does not guarantee a seat at a screening. Seating is on a first-come, first served basis. The theater is overbooked to assure a full house.

Rated PG 13.

foxmovies.com/movies/bohemian-rhapsody

L-R: Gwilym Lee (Brian May), Ben Hardy (Roger Taylor), Rami Malek (Freddie Mercury), and Joe Mazzello (John Deacon) star in Twentieth Century Fox’s BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY. Photo Credit: Courtesy Twentieth Century Fox.

THE HIRED HAND – The Blu Review

Review by Roger Carpenter

By 1971 Peter Fonda was an icon of the counterculture.  He’d starred in the LSD quickie The Trip as well as the pioneering biker film The Wild Angels.  He was fresh off of Easy Rider and ready to spread his wings and show the viewing public that he was more than a pot-smoking hippie biker with his directorial debut, The Hired Hand.

The Hired Hand tells the story of Harry, a wayward soul who married too early and took off to see the world with his two buddies, Arch (Warren Oates) and Dan (Robert Pratt).  After years in the wilderness, the three determine to head to California and the Pacific Ocean, but Dan unexpectedly dies along the way and Harry (Peter Fonda) decides it’s time to head home, to the wife and infant daughter he left seven long years ago.  But will she take Harry back, or has she moved on with her life?

Critics throw terms around in reviews all the time, and I’m about to do the same.  But hopefully I’ll back my assertions up with facts.  The Hired Hand is an anti-western.  This is true for many reasons, the first being that, according to Fonda himself, his overarching concept was to create a film that portrayed the 1880’s west as realistically as possible.  So no cowboys and gunslingers getting killed bloodlessly.  No one dies before they hit the ground.  The reality is that death sometimes allows life to linger for a while before moving in and taking over.  There is pain.  There is sorrow.  While The Hired Hand is no Wild Bunch, filled with graphic violence and blood flying everywhere, it’s no less powerful when addressing death.  While there is very little blood, people don’t die quickly, leading to several very powerful scenes—scenes in which men cry for their mothers or ask to be held by other men while they die.  These are not the typical death scenes in classic Hollywood westerns, where men die quickly and stoically.  These cowboys are human beings, with all the emotions of human beings.


Aside from this, the film is less about cowboys and The West as it is about friendship, love, revenge, and redemption.  It happens to be set in the early 1880’s in the west, so there are plenty of western tropes.  But the underlying foundation of the story goes all the way back to Greek literature and is still being told today in books and films.  So forget that the characters all wear hats, ride horses, and carry guns.  Forget the setting is in the southwestern U.S.  The story is timeless and could be told just as easily in any time and in any location.  An anti-western.

Fonda set out to do something different from his earlier ‘B’ pictures and to set himself apart from these exploitation films.  And he did it in spades.  When critics list their “most beautiful films” The Hired Hand is never mentioned, but it should be.  A young Vilmos Zsigmond acted as cinematographer.  His photography is simply stunning.  The scenery is absolutely gorgeous and the sunsets are some of the most spectacular ever filmed.  The film is a very quiet film. It’s languid—it takes its time in telling the story.  The measured pacing might be off-putting for those expecting a typical western but I was captivated by every moment of the film.  The score is simple and filled with instruments that would have been played in 1880: guitar; banjo; harmonica; mandolin.  And all were played by the same man, Bruce Langhorne, a musical virtuoso.  The score, too, is gentle and quiet, and aurally matches the beauty of Zsigmond’s cinematography.  Editing was completed by Frank Mazzola who, like composer Langhorne, only racked up a dozen or so credits over his lifetime but was busy with other projects as well.  Mazzola proved to be a master of the montage and while that particular technique can sometimes be overused, in this case, montage is used to near perfection.  It’s a technique that Mazzola utilized throughout the film and is always well-done and, in staying close to the heart of the film, is done beautifully.

While the storytelling, cinematography, musical score, and editing are all excellent, the acting is standout as well.  Fonda stars as Harry, who was only 20 when he was married.  It didn’t take long for him to become restless with his marriage, except in this case his mistress was the frontier.  We never see the exchange between Harry and his wife as he leaves; instead, we are introduced to Harry after many years of traveling the wilderness and only learn of his past later on in the film.  Did he have a discussion with his wife or did she awaken one day to learn she was abandoned?  Harry can read and write, so did he leave a note or was his wife forced to come to terms with his departure over weeks or months of no communication?  Did she know Harry loved her?  While these questions are never addressed, the characters are portrayed with such depth that we want to know more, we want to understand the pain and the sorrow.  Fonda portrays Harry as an enigma.  He seldom speaks and when he does, it’s a short, matter of fact statement, and then he’s done.  He wastes no time on expounding on his feelings and very rarely are his feelings on display.  In one scene Dan discovers the body of a little girl which has accidentally been tangled in their fishing line.  Harry cuts the line to Dan’s dismay, and explains that “the body would come to pieces in your hands on the first tug.”  He has sympathy for others but he also has experience that is never addressed in the actual film.  When Dan is murdered shortly thereafter, you can see his blood boiling, but, unlike in a typical western where the hero starts a shootout in a bar, drops 30 people, and walks out unscathed, Harry understands this is not the time to pick a fight.  It is suggested to him the body be buried the next day since it’s very late but Harry simply says, “We’ll bury him tonight.”  Even his initial encounter with the wife he left is enigmatic.  He doesn’t cry, he doesn’t beg, he doesn’t try to reason.  He simply asks for a trial basis as a hired hand on the farm, living in the barn.  The closest we get to any real emotion is when he realizes his lifelong friend, Arch, is in imminent peril and he must once again leave his wife after only a few weeks.  He is frustrated at her for not understanding and is clearly upset at Arch’s predicament.  But, throughout the film, we never learn much about who Harry really is, nor what drives him to make such fateful decisions in his life.


Co-star Warren Oates, as Arch, is a delight.  As Arch, Oates portrays wisdom.  Like Harry, he speaks seldom and normally in as few words as possible.  But his words are measured and important.  He is the only true friend Harry has and, perhaps the only love of Harry’s life, in the familial sense of the word.  The two are inseparable.  Oates was rarely a leading man but made a career out of playing villains.  Perhaps most famous for his long-time professional relationship with Sam Peckinpaugh, Oates honed his craft in westerns and dramas throughout the 1960’s and, though he was nearly always in a supporting role, became one of the few character actors identifiable to the public by name and face.  Just as he supported many stars over a lifetime of films, Oates is outstanding as he supports Fonda’s character of Harry in this film, always going where Harry wants to go, doing what Harry wants to do.  He is a calming influence on Harry, however.  For instance, Arch quietly recommends to Harry that they seek revenge at a later time when they are surrounded and outgunned by the men who killed Dan.  It’s Arch who goes along with Harry’s revenge the next day even as he warns Harry it might not be a good idea.  And Arch follows Harry home, living in a barn even as Harry moves back into his own home before finally determining to leave Harry and his wife on their own once he’s satisfied that all is well.

Supporting Fonda and Oates is Robert Pratt as the young Dan, “full of piss and vinegar,” as Arch describes him.  He’s probably around 20 years old himself, tempestuous, naïve, and impulsive.  He portrays innocence.  He wants to give the little girl on the fishing line a proper burial—not a bad thought at all—but Harry understands the shape the corpse is in and has a more realistic concept about it than Dan.  Dan wants to head to California to see the ocean because he has heard about its beauty, so the trio determine to do just that.  Unfortunately, Dan’s innocence gets him killed in a small village along the way.  This sequence is one of the main drivers of the film as it sets up the motive for revenge, by both Fonda as Harry as well as Severn Darden as the mean-spirited McVey, who will kill a man for his horse.  Darden is only in a handful of scenes but he is pitch-perfect as the wolf in sheepskin.  Harry and Arch understand this; Dan does not.

Finally, there is Verna Bloom, who plays Harry’s wife, Hannah.  She played in the likes of Medium Cool, Animal House, High Plains Drifter, and The Last Temptation of Christ.  Bloom has the perfect look for a pioneer woman.  Still young but dark from the sun and beginning to be wrinkled, hair pulled up in a bun, she has a look of no-nonsense severity to her.  She looks like every single pioneer woman in every old-time photo you have ever seen.  And she does more with her eyes and face than perhaps any other actress in the past 40-plus years.  The look of realization she has when she finally recognizes her wayward husband standing in front of her porch is almost one of horror and shock, than of pleasure.  She had written him off years ago.  A scene with Oates is equally powerful. Oates questions why she doesn’t have a dog, noting it’s rare to see a homestead without one.  Hannah replies that she used to have one before it ran off, adding that she never quite saw the need to get another after that betrayal.  Another powerhouse scene has Hannah confronting Harry when Harry brings up rumors he’s heard in town about Hannah sleeping with her hired hands.  Hannah’s reply is simple and to the point:  she was lonely, he was lonely, and she had needs that went unfulfilled thanks to Harry leaving her.  She basically tells him “tough luck” but you don’t have a right to judge me, for this wouldn’t have happened if you hadn’t have left.  But even Hannah, as kind as she is, can’t help being mean.  She goes on to describe the actions she had with other men as sometimes being in the barn, sometimes in the dirt “like two dogs.”  She wants her humiliations to be Harry’s humiliations.  She wants her pain to be his pain.  It is a remarkably powerful performance through few words and many facial expressions—an actor’s dream job.


Don’t go into The Hired Hand if you are expecting a typical western of the 50’s or 60’s.  Don’t go into The Hired Hand if you are expecting Peckinpaugh’s stylized ultraviolence or the spaghetti western motifs of the time.  This is a character-driven drama that happens to be placed in a time and location that identifies it as a “western.”  Expect to be moved—by the story, the scenery, the acting, the cinematography, the score.  And expect to be mystified—at why this film flopped at the box office on its initial release in 1971.  Was it the atrocious ad campaign?  Was it such an unexpected Fonda film that audiences were confused?  Or was it just a victim of the time in which it was made?  Whatever the reason, if you’ve never seen The Hired Hand, now is the time as Arrow Video USA has issued a brand-new Blu-Ray of the film.  Special features include an hour-long documentary on the making of the film, completed in 2003 as the film was being restored; another hour-long documentary on Scottish screenwriters, including Alan Sharp who wrote the screenplay for The Hired Hand; a fairly lengthy audio interview with Fonda and Oates from 1971 in London; a short interview with Martin Scorcese; deleted/extended scenes; and a commentary by Fonda himself.  Several film trailers and TV and radio spots round out the package.

You can purchase the film directly from Arrow Video at http://www.arrowfilms.co.uk/category/usa/ or from Amazon.

Win Passes To The Advance Screening Of HUNTER KILLER In St. Louis

In theaters October 26, 2018 is the action thriller HUNTER KILLER.

Deep under the Arctic Ocean, American submarine Captain Joe Glass (Gerard Butler, Olympus Has Fallen, 300) is on the hunt for a U.S. sub in distress when he discovers a secret Russian coup is in the offing, threatening to dismantle the world order. With crew and country on the line, Captain Glass must now assemble an elite group of Navy SEALs to rescue the kidnapped Russian president and sneak through enemy waters to stop WWIII.

Also starring Oscar® winner Gary Oldman (Best Actor, Darkest Hour, 2017), Common (John Wick: Chapter 2), Linda Cardellini (Avengers: Age of Ultron) and Toby Stephens (Die Another Day), HUNTER KILLER is a high-stakes thriller that unfolds both by land and sea.

WAMG has your free passes to the advance screening of HUNTER KILLER in St. Louis.

Date: October 24, 7pm in the St. Louis area.

ENTER FOR YOUR CHANCE TO WIN A PASS GOOD FOR TWO!

Answer the Following:

What is your favorite Gerard Butler movie?

Add you name, answer and email in our comments section below.

NO PURCHASE REQUIRED. A pass does not guarantee a seat at a screening. Seating is on a first-come, first served basis. The theater is overbooked to assure a full house.

Rated R for violence and some language.

VISIT THE OFFICIAL SITE: https://www.hunterkiller.movie/