THE LADY IN THE VAN – The Review

THE LADY IN THE VAN

Maggie Smith brings an irresistible irascible charm to her role as a homeless woman who parks her van the driveway of playwright Alan Bennett and then stays for 15 years, in THE LADY IN THE VAN. Although this is a far different character from her role as the Dowager Countess, “Downton Abbey” fans will delight in finding a similar comic brilliance in Smith’s Miss Shepard, with the same sense of her own importance and an iron determination to have her own way. The quirky and charming THE LADY IN THE VAN showcases Smith’s considerable skill in dominating every scene – in fact, the whole film.

Nicholas Hytner, who also directed HISTORY BOYS, brings a lot of dry, self-deprecating British humor to this screen adaptation of Bennett’s partly biographical play. Although the story is narrated by and told from the point of view of playwright Alan Bennett (Alex Jennings), it is Smith’s eccentric, maddening character that steals the show.

The film manages the difficult task of walking a line between comedy and pathos by not sentimentalizing Smith’s Miss Shepard. Reprising her stage role, Smith is a delight as this difficult yet intriguing old woman. Hytner also brings in some cast members from his HISTORY BOYS, such as Dominic Cooper, in small roles.

To its credit, the film avoids sentimentalizing homelessness or mental illness,in part by keeping a distinctly British dry-humor tone. An early scene deals in a frank, funny way with an inescapable consequence of living in a van without a shower. As Bennett describes it, the mix of odors trailing in Miss Shepard’s wake are distinctive, including the onions she is fond of eating and the lavender powder she is equally fond of using to disguise the onions and other smells. As delivered by actor Alex Jennings as Bennett, the observation is both pointed and very funny.

The story mixes fact and fiction, which Jennings’ character bluntly tells the audience. Bennett’s character is divided into two parts – the writer and the private man – which allows the actor to engage in comic conversations with himself – about his work, his flagging personal life, his conflicted feelings about his aging mother and the lady in the van living in his driveway.

The story is set in 1960s London, a time when tolerance towards the homeless has become a fashionable attitude but being gay is still something the playwright might keep under wraps. The eccentric, bossy lady living in the van, Miss Shepard, had taken up residence already on the leafy, prosperous street when Bennett bought a house. The neighbors express a pitying tolerance of the homeless woman while silently hoping she would move on. Strong-willed, rude and odd, the old lady parks in front of one house after another, until the homeowners irritate her into moving down the block. Those irritations include by playing music or interrupting her with offers of food, which she takes but for which she never thanks them.

When street cleaners pester her to move her now-non-functional van, she basically browbeats the playwright into letting her park the van in his driveway. Temporarily, of course. For 15 years.

Despite having little hesitation about manipulating people to get her way, Miss Shepard is surprisingly secretive about her past and even who she is, telling people she is “incognito.” A man who appears creeping around one night, Mr. Underwood (Jim Broadbent), hints at a sinister secret but we learn little about her history until late in the film. An early scene suggests a traffic accident is part of why this secretive old woman is living in a van.

The reserved, almost reclusive Bennett is struggling in his work as a playwright, and also with what to do about his clinging aging mother, who would like to move in with him. It is a prospect the playwright dreads, although he ends up with another old lady, a stranger, camped out on his doorstep. Trying to establish a personal life, the gay Bennett brings home a series of nice looking young men but never seems to be able to quite speak up and make a connection.

The story contrasts Bennett’s relationship with his mother and the lady in the van, as well as coping with his own struggles as a writer and to build a personal life for himself. Miss Shepard is never forthcoming about her past although there are intriguing hints that she was once a nun and has a special connection to music. Despite her rudeness, Bennett becomes protective of her, even possessive, and begrudgingly fond.

Bennett’s two-part character, both played by Jennings with perfect low-key humor, provides a running comic dialog, while expressing Bennett’s inner thoughts. Sometimes those inner thoughts are to stand up to Miss Shepard, who bullies him mercilessly, although the polite, reserved Bennett never does. Despite their long acquaintance, the pair only ever call each other Mr. Bennett and Miss Shepard, and Bennett even bristles at a social worker who is assigned to the old woman, when she calls her Mary, informing her that it is not her real name which he has learned is Margaret – he thinks. In some ways, the social worker prompts Bennett to learn more about the woman who lived in his driveway all these years.

The film takes a turn towards whimsy at its end, which might irritate some viewers but fits well with determinedly unsentimental and comic tone. For those who relish low-key British humor, THE LADY IN THE VAN provides a pleasant ride, especially with the incomparable Maggie Smith at the wheel.

THE LADY IN THE VAN OPENS IN ST. LOUIS ON FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 5

OVERALL RATING:  4 OUT OF 5 STARS

lady_in_the_van_ver3_xlg

45 YEARS – The Review

Key_2_45+YEARS_copyright+Agatha+A.+Nitecka

One would think that after 45 years of marriage, a husband and wife would know everything about each other. As the British drama 45 YEARS reveals, in devastating fashion, there are some unknowns that may always remain between two people.

Charlotte Rampling and Tom Courtenay give brilliant performances as a long-married couple in 45 YEARS, a subtle, moving drama about a couple whose lives are changed by an event long in the past. Rampling is deservedly nominated for an Oscar, after having gathered already a number of awards for her riveting performance, a performance that shows what a real actress can do.

As Kate (Rampling) and Geoff (Courtenay) Mercer prepare for their 45th anniversary party taking place at the end of that week, Geoff gets a letter from Switzerland, that reveals unknown parts of a long-ago past that have a profound effect on their marriage.

The film begins with the couple putter happily about their rural English cottage home, taking long walks with their dog and trips into the nearby Norfork village, where they meet with old friends. They have the kind of comfortable, almost telepathic connection of a happy long-married couple. Despite never having children, they seem content living a comfortable middle-class retirement after careers as a teacher for Kate and factory manager for Geoff.

When the letter arrives, things begin to take a strange turn. The letter, written in German that Geoff struggles to read, tells him that the body of his long-ago girlfriend Katya has been found in a crevasse where she fell to her death decades earlier. The letter comes to Geoff because he and Katya had been hiking through the Alps when the accident happened, and Geoff has been listed as her husband, as they were posing as a married couple although they were not actually married. The letter asked him, as next-of-kin, to come to Switzerland to identify the body although it could not be retrieved from the ice, something that would require him to hike up the mountain.

The request was impractical, of course, and it seems as if Geoff dismisses it. Kate vaguely remembered her husband telling her about the girlfriend who died before they met but had not thought much about it. Yet, as the week progresses, Geoff’ seems more agitated and obsessed with the long-dead woman, going through old mementos in the attic and secretly smoking again. Kate is put in the strange position of feeling jealous of a long-vanished rival, wondering about what it means for her marriage.

After seeming the kind of couple their friends hold up as a perfect marriage, that their marriage can be thrown into a sudden crisis by someone long dead, gone before they even met, seems inconceivable. Still, the film reveals how someone can be married to someone else for many years and still not truly know that person.

The film avoids the stereotypes commonly found is films about older people. British director Andrew Haigh (“Weekend”) structures the drama as a day-by-day countdown, as they prepare for a party to celebrate their 45th anniversary. Courtenay is excellent but the drama’s real focus is on Rampling, who delivers the performance of a lifetime.

As they count down the days to the anniversary party, the news works on their relationship, with Kate feeling an unreasonable jealousy of a dead rival, and Geoff descending into a secretive nostalgia, where he talks about going to Switzerland to see her body, still encased in ice and inaccessible, sneaking up to the attic to go through old mementos from that time in his life.

While Kate’s view of her marriage is unraveling at home, they have to maintain their “perfect couple” facade for their friends as they prepare from the big party. The anniversary seems an odd one to celebrate with a big party but we learn that a 40th anniversary party had been canceled after Geoff had a health crisis. The 45 year mark might seem like a good substitute for a couple where there are questions about whether the husband will make it to the 50th.

45 YEARS is exquisitely acted with Rampling giving a tour-de-force performance of such subtle power it is breathtaking. The subtle, sensitive way this story is told adds to its strength, an quiet yet powerful exploration of emotions and perceptions. Rampling is astounding, and while Courtenay is excellent, it is her performance dominates in this film. While Courtenay’s emotions are all on the surface, even where Geoff is less forthcoming on his thoughts, Rampling’s performance is all subtlety and small gestures. In the final sequence, a series of emotions play across her face indicating she is seeing her husband in a new and unwelcome way, one that undermines all she believes about her marriage.

The film ends as a shattering realization dawns on Kate, while she is surrounded by people at the festive party. The epiphany is one that she must face going forward, and effect on the audience is devastating, despite the subtle way it unfolds across Rampling’s face and through her body language. It is a haunting scene, painful and inevitable, one that will linger in the mind just as 45 YEARS does.

45 YEARS OPENS IN ST. LOUIS ON FRIDAY, JANUARY 29TH AT LANDMARK’S PLAZA FRONTENAC CINEMA

OVERALL RATING:  5 OUT OF 5 STARS

45years_onesheet_web

NORM OF THE NORTH – The Review

NOTN_055

Sometimes a film critic has to throw himself or herself on a bomb for the good of the movie-going public. One such bomb is NORM OF THE NORTH. I see these movies so you don’t have to.

NORM OF THE NORTH is an animated movie about a polar bear that has to go to New York to save his Arctic home. What could go wrong with that kids’ movie premise? Well, in the case of “Norm of the North,” everything. What is the threat that Norm and his little lemming buddies want to save their home from – climate change? oil drilling? No, it is a housing development. Yeah, this Arctic is threatened with gentrification, at the hands of a billionaire developer named Mr. Greene (wink, wink).

Yep, that is about as funny as this film gets.

Norm (voiced by Rob Schneider) is a clumsy polar bear who is object of ridicule among the residents – caribou, orcas, seals, lemmings, other polar bears – in his frozen Arctic seaside home. He is not only a bad hunter but it too soft-hearted to actually eat the few seals he does catch (what he does live on we never learn). The Arctic animals seem to spend their days waiting for tourist ships to show up, so they can put on a show for them. Really – show-biz singing and dancing with costumes and a few Sea World type stunts. It seems pretty strange but to these characters, it is normal. However, Norm is not fond of the tourists and does not think they belong in the Arctic. Still, Norm has a knack for dancing, which he uses to entertain his family, and another, unwanted gift – he can speak “human.” This ability to talk to people is a quirk he shares with his beloved Grandpa (voice of Colm Meaney), who thinks Norm could become the King of the North.

One day, something new shows up on the ice – a house – along with a real estate marketing director named Vera (Heather Graham) and a crew to shoot a commercial for the new development from Greene Homes. The plan is to sell luxury condos in the Arctic. Norm worries that the Arctic home will suffer to same fate as his flamingo friend’s in Florida – first tourists, then year-round homes. He determines to go to New York, along with his durable lemming friends, to stop real estate developer Mr. Greene’s (Ken Jeong) nefarious plan to turn the Arctic into the next Florida.

Turning the Arctic into the next Florida is a kind-of back door climate change reference but not one children are going to get. I guess one has to give the creators of this animated mess some credit for coming up with the weirdest premise ever.  Unfortunately, the creativity pretty much stops there. Story and character elements of other kids’ movies are recycled, including bits of “The Lion King” and “Happy Feet.” The animation is lackluster at best. Even worse, “Norm of the North” is not even funny.

Most of the movie is pretty serious about its absurd “save our home” premise. What little humor it has hardly brings a chuckle – mostly fart, poop and pee jokes, some lame jokes for parents, and jabs the villainous Mr. Greene. Greene is a big ego who sports a pony-tail, wears ’70s clothes, and decorates his fancy office with Asian themes, practicing meditation while abusing his employees. At one point, there is even a throwaway line about a one-dimensional villain – that is about as funny as it gets. The writers use their Arctic location for set jokes about Sea World, tourists, card-playing caribou, movie directors and real estate – jokes so weak one hardly cracks a smile – then move the story to New York, where they miss all chances for any fish-out-of-water humor based on the idea of a polar bear in New York.

It is no wonder the studio dumped this smelly kettle of fish of a movie in the January doldrums, The question is why it did not go straight to video. One can guess that the creators of this frozen mess were trolling for some unsuspecting parents who are fishing for a family movie in this month’s sea of grown-up Oscar-hopeful films. Don’t take the bait.

NORM OF THE NORTH opens in theaters on Friday, January 15, 2016.

OVERALL RATING:  1 OUT OF 5 STARS

Final Poster

THE BIG SHORT – The Review

BGS-02221R

Making a comedy about a serious subject is a tricky thing. But it has been done – think DR. STRANGELOVE or THE GREAT DICTATOR.  THE BIG SHORT is a dark comedy with biting wit about the real estate bubble and meltdown that triggered the Great Recession. Or at least it is funny to start, until remembering all that greed and misbehavior begins to make you angry all over again.

Many will find THE BIG SHORT a brilliant, intelligent, pointedly funny film. Whether you like “The Big Short” or not might depend on how you feel about those events and the fact that no major figures went to jail. The right-leaning media seems determined to call the film terrible, despite its appearance on many critics’ top-ten lists.

Christian Bale heads up a terrific ensemble cast that includes Steve Carrell, Ryan Gosling, and Brad Pitt. Director Adam McKay adapted the Michael Lewis book of the same name. The film opens with voice-over by Gosling and Michael Burry (Bale), a physician turned investor, uncovering what he thinks is an anomaly in the market, one he can exploit by “shorting” investments that are considered some of the safest, ones backed by home mortgages, long considered rock-solid reliable. Pitt’s character Ben Rickert, a former investor who has dropped out of the rat-race to live out in the woods, is based on Ben Hockett, Gosling portrays Jared Vennett, a character based on the real Gregg Lippman, one of several investors looking into mortgaged-backed securities and discovering the problems that will eventually crash the economy.

Among these high-powered, often eccentric individuals mining financial information for overlooked investment gold are Mark Baum (Carell), somewhat based on the real Steve Eisman. All these guys are strikingly unique but Baum’s foul-mouthed, high-stress character is among the most eccentric, as well as funny. Baum engages in a running back-and-forth with his wife (Marisa Tomei), in which she tells him he should quit his job because he hates it while Baum insists he loves it.

This story requires the use of some technical financial talk, which director McKay handles in a clever way. Margot Robbie soaks in a bubble bath, sipping champagne while explaining sub-prime mortgages, one of several interludes where unlikely celebrities, such as Anthony Bourdain and Selena Gomez, to provide definitions and brief explanations of financial terms. The effect is both humorous and informative, a far better solution than the usual one of stopping the dialog for some exposition by the characters…

The film is fast and funny, switching from person to person. As befits the irrational exuberance that proceeded the crash, the film has a breathless pace and driving energy. Gosling’s voice-over helps us keep track in this rapid-paced, cleverly presented  story that sometimes plays a bit like an action thriller. But the comic tone starts to drop away as these clever people start to realize how far down the rabbit hole this problem goes, the chain of responsibility that runs all the way to the top, and its incendiary potential for the U.S and world economies and people’s individual lives. Coming at all that makes the revelations all the more chilling.

THE BIG SHORT is one of the year’s best films in a year that has seen some other great films about real-world subjects, such as SPOTLIGHT. Human folly and our capacity for short-sightedness as well as greed are major themes in this brilliant, worthy film. THE BIG SHORT starts out with comedy but ends with tragedy for those not in on the secret under the market.

THE BIG SHORT opens in St. Louis on Wednesday, December 23rd, 2015.

OVERALL RATING:  5 OUT OF 5 STARS

BIG_SHORT_RATED_PAYOFF_1SHEET_ARROWS

CONCUSSION – The Review

© 2015 Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
© 2015 Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

CONCUSSION is the film that the NFL won’t want you to see. Not because it has new information about the link between football and a serious form of dementia called chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) but because it serves as a reminder, particularly to young players and their parents, of the risk in playing the nation’s most popular sport. The film dramatizes the NFL’s hostile response to the news and its rough handling of the doctor who discovered the problem. The NFL does not look good in this film, and that is bound to trouble some fans.

Will Smith plays that doctor, Dr. Bennet Omalu, a forensic pathologist originally from Nigeria who discovered CTE. A brilliant man with a string of degrees, Dr. Omalu was working for the Allegheny County Coroner’s office in Pittsburgh when he did an autopsy on former NFL star Mike Webster (David Morse), whose life had unraveled a decade after retirement amid erratic behavior. Omalu knew next to nothing about football but was unsatisfied with a pat explanation about cause of death of a man only in his 50s. The thorough Omalu decided to take a microscopic look at the ex-player’s brain. What he saw shocked him, and led to his discovery of a new disease.

CONCUSSION focuses on Omalu’s story and especially on how poorly the NFL treated him. The film’s title is a bit of a misnomer, as not just concussions but cumulative smaller shocks to the brain can cause CTE as well, although concussions are the most obvious indicator of brain trauma. However, the film is rather light on medical details and it leaves out the work of other researchers who took up the topic following Omalu’s discovery. Instead, the film focuses more on Omalu’s own story, his discovery, his immediate circle of supporters and their attempts to bring the risks to the attention of the NFL.

As Smith plays him, Omalu is a sweet, idealistic workaholic who does not allow himself much of a personal life in his pursuit of the classic immigrant’s American Dream. His boss, Dr. Cyril Wecht (Albert Brooks),  is both his mentor and role-model for how to be an American. The one social outlet he allows himself is attending church, where his pastor asks him to help another new immigrant, a beautiful former nurse from Kenya named Prema (Gugu Mbatha-Raw). Inevitably, romance blooms.

This is one of Smith’s best roles in years, and the actor does a nice job with Omalu’s accent. It is a rare chance for Smith to play a heroic character but in a more subdued, even slightly nerdy way, which he pulls off with a great deal of charm.

In his quest to bring CTE to the attention of NFL officials, Omalu is joined by former league physician, Dr. Julian Bailes, played well by Alec Baldwin apart from a Southern accent that tends to come and go. The cast also includes Eddie Marsan as Dr. Steven DeKosky, a top neurologist who co-authored Omalu’s paper on CTE, Paul Reiser as Dr. Elliot Pellman, an NFL doctor who was a central figure in the concussion crisis, and Luke Wilson as NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell.

Not only is the NFL not interested in hearing that players are at risk of a serious brain syndrome, much less that potentially all or most players face that risk, the organization is actively hostile to that message. With a multimillion-dollar entertainment empire called into question, the NFL immediately seek to discredit and then silence Omalu. As it is presented in the film, this is done in an iron-fisted, chilling manner, more expected from organized crime than a respected sports organization. The film alludes to the fact that  NFL may have been aware of brain-injury issues, and parallels are drawn with the way the tobacco industry tried to deny the health effects of smoking.

The film’s major flaw is that it cannot quite make up its mind what kind of film it wants to be – a medical procedural, corporate misbehavior expose, or an inspirational immigrant tale. It is mostly Omalu’s story, leaving out researchers who built on his discovery and how the NFL treated him. It is light on medical details of CTE and also on what the NFL might have known about players’ brain injuries. Omalu’s personal story is a classic immigrant tale, with a sweet romance to add to that appeal, but the  immigrant love story doesn’t develop the emotional  pull it should.

CONCUSSION does not make the NFL look good, but it also raises questions about the safety of football at any level, which might give parents pause about letting their kids participate. The film does not present any new information, but serves as a reminder of the headline revelations in a dramatic way. While it is not a perfect film, it is worth seeing for its potential to spark curiosity to dig further into the facts of CTE.

CONCUSSION opens in St. Louis on December 25th, 2015.

OVERALL RATING:  3 1/2 OUT OF 5 STARS

concussion-CONC_DGTL_MRKT_FNL_5_rgb

YOUTH – The Review

Photo by Gianni Fiorito. © 2015 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation All Rights Reserved
Photo by Gianni Fiorito. © 2015 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation All Rights Reserved

YOUTH centers on two life-long friends, both successful and famous, a film director and composer/orchestra conductor, who are vacationing together in a posh Swiss resort. Michael Caine plays the retired composer/conductor Fred Balinger and Harvey Keitel plays director Mick Boyle, who isn’t retired but is working on what he thinks may be his last important film.

This lushly beautiful, intelligent, and moving English-language film is directed and written by Paolo Sorrentino, who won the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar for “The Great Beauty” last year. Besides that Oscar winner, Sorrentino also directed “Il Divo,” a chilling look inside Italian politics, and the comic and strange road movie “This Must Be The Place,” with Sean Penn as an aging rocker honoring his Jewish grandfather’s last request. Sorrentino’s skill as a director is widely acknowledged but his complex, beautiful, strangely dreamlike films are not for everyone. In any language, YOUTH is an intriguing film, a mix of comedy and drama that explores friendship, life, memory, and choices. The film has a European sensibility, with thoughtful, intelligent dialog, a slower pace and twists and revelations that come near the end. It is a film about transformations, which can come even late in life.

These two characters certainly are not young but YOUTH looks at how they think about their future as well as how they remember their youth. The odd title might be partly inspired by the old saying “youth is wasted on the young,” as these two accomplished men look back on their life choices and regrets, in light of what they know now.  Fred is determinedly retired, and even seems to have given up on life. At the film’s start, Fred is determinately resisting pressure to leave retirement for a special concert request by the Queen of England, and particularly her request to play his most famous piece, which he has vowed to never perform again since his soprano wife can no longer sing it. Mick, on the other hand, is firmly resisting any thought of retiring, although he feels his best work is behind him. Working on a film he hopes will be his masterpiece, he is struggling with the script despite the help of a team of young scriptwriters he has brought along to the Swiss resort. The film is set to feature his longtime star, Brenda Morel, a fading beauty whose career he helped launch.

Although these two old friends are the main characters, the film also explores the idea of youth from the viewpoint of some younger characters in the film, primarily the ones played by Rachel Weisz and Paul Dano.

Music figures heavily in this film – Fred is a composer after all – and the music is provided by renowned composer David Lang. Much of the film’s appeal rests with the interaction between Caine and Keitel as the longtime best friends. They play around, prank, kid, lie, tell stories, reminisce and generally talk, as only long-time friends can. Both are master storytellers and competitive, as they remember the past and  look back on choices of their youth. Caine, an acclaimed 82-year-old Englishman, plays another acclaimed 82-year-old Englishman which adds a curious twist to his scenes. As the actor notes, the film is less about the conventional anguish of growing old as being in the more-unexpected place of having grown old.

But YOUTH is not just about remembered youth but those who have lives ahead. The film weaves in the stories of younger people, reflecting on what they have done and trying to figure out where they are going. Accompanying Fred is his daughter/assistant Lena (Rachel Weisz), who is trying to recover from the collapse of her marriage, and a famous actor Jimmy Tree (Paul Dano) preparing for his latest role, which is a secret at this point. Jimmy is trying to establish himself  as a serious actor but a silly but iconic action movie role that first brought him fame continues to dog him. Also at this exclusive mountain resort are the recent winner of the Miss Universe beauty pageant, a once-legendary soccer star now overweight and barely able to move, numerous other wealthy and famous people, and a host of supporting characters. Jane Fonda plays Mick’s star and muse Brenda, once a movie star beauty who still holds onto her fame if not her legendary looks. In the course of the film, all these people work out their various fears and ambitions. Despite the difference in their age, Jimmy and Fred form a bond.

The gorgeous Swiss mountain views and historic hotel give a timelessness and sense of contemplation to these discussions. The dialog is intriguing as the two friends spare verbally, contemplative in their moments of solitude and touching when it focuses on the younger characters. The landscape sets the mood but also is the setting for solitary fantasy sequences where Fred and Mick recall their long careers.

Towards the end of this dreamy, languid, beautiful film in an insular world, it takes a sharp turn with the arrival of Jane Fonda as aging movie goddess Brenda Morel. Heavily made-up and dressed in a tight, over-the-top outfit, Fonda’s Brenda is a tiger, a tough survivor of Hollywood. Fonda and Keitel have a riveting scene that strips all the otherworldly dreaminess and delivers a lightning bolt. It is a part of a series of transformations and revelations that break the cocoon that has surrounded everyone at the resort.

Sorrentino’s attention to detail and skill as a filmmaker are unquestioned but YOUTH is not a film for every taste. Whether you like YOUTH might depend on how you feel about the director’s previous films, or this kind of visually lush, contemplative film where the characters seem trapped in their own purgatories. For some, it is a wonderful experience but for others, it will not suit.

YOUTH opens in St. Louis on Friday, December 18th, 2015.

OVERALL RATING:  5 OUT OF 5 STARS

Untitled-1

THE DANISH GIRL – The Review

B115_C002_0304UA

THE DANISH GIRL is a film about a transsexual pioneer, played by Eddie Redmayne and directed by Tom Hooper. Hooper has demonstrated his skill with lush period drama in THE KING’S SPEECH and Redmayne’s performance as Stephen Hawking in THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING impressed but THE DANISH GIRL is as much a story of the power of love, with Alicia Vikander delivering a strong performance as the wife facing a difficult change.

The story opens in the 1920s with a happily married couple, a pair of Danish artists, Einar (Redmayne) and Gerda (Vikander) Wegener, who seem like soul mates. Einar having some success with his landscape paintings, while Gerda is still struggling for recognition for her portraits. One day, Gerda’s model does not show up, and in order to complete the commissioned work by deadline, she asks her husband to dress up as a woman and take the model’s place. He resists at first, but then relents. The feel of women’s clothing awakens something in Einar. Their actress friend Ulla (Amber Heard) dubs Einar’s female alter ego “Lili.”  As Einar feels the pull of being Lili, everything changes for both artists.

The film is based on a novel that was inspired by the first transgender person to undergo sex-reassignment surgery. While a lot of attention will be focused on Redmayne, who does a fine job, the really impressive performance, the one that might grab audiences, is Vikander’s heartbreaking one as Gerda Wegener. Gerda truly loves the husband she is losing as she helps him through this transition. This may be Vikander’s year, following up her striking performance in EX MACHINA with this moving one.

THE DANISH GIRL is one of the season’s two Oscar-bait period dramas focused on persons with a sexual nature that were taboo in their era. The other, CAROL, an adaptation of a Patricia Highsmith novel, is set in the repressive 1950s and is a love story about lesbian couple. THE DANISH GIRL is set in the free-wheeling 1920s and is based on a novel inspired by real people and events, about a married pair of artists whose lives are transformed when the husband comes out as a transgender person. It too is a love story, as the wife’s devotion to her husband transcend the changes that are causing her heartbreak. Both films are gorgeous and filled with fine period details and costumes but CAROL is garnering higher critical praise. This is due in part to strong performances but also perhaps because it is set in the repressive 1950s, a time period once called the “little Victorian Age.” “The Mad Men” ’50s seems to speak more to current tastes than the Roaring Twenties, a period of rebellion, experimentation and artistic creativity that followed the actual Victorian Age and the devastation of World War I. Or maybe it is because THE DANISH GIRL is a different kind of tragic love story.

THE DANISH GIRL is lushly beautiful, of course. Hooper is known for the visual beauty and stylishness of his films. THE DANISH GIRL is no exception – quite the contrary. Set in the European art world of the ’20s and ’30s, when gorgeous fashions and decor abounded  – and at the film’s height, in Paris no less – gives Hooper an abundance of riches with which to work. But all that visual beauty might work against the very serious, tragic drama unfolding.

The assumption one might make is that the title “The Danish Girl” refers to Redmayne’s character but a line of dialog actually links it to Gerda Wegener, whose heartbreak is mixed with a tireless devotion to her husband as he pursues his dream of transitioning into a woman, the first to attempt sex reassignment surgery. Vikander’s performance is moving and strong, providing such a powerful presence that the film seems diminished when she is not on screen. Redmayne makes a valiant effort but his freckled, masculine face and lanky frame are never fully convincing as a woman, although that works in a way.

Redmayne and Vikander are wonderful together, and the film has nice supporting roles played by Ben Whishaw, Sebastian Koch, Amber Heard and Matthias Schoenaerts. While the look is entrancing and the acting moving, the film suffers a bit from lack of focus. Primarily, the story is about the marriage but occasionally it wants to be about transgender issues, and even hints at the possibility that Einar was intersex. The film deviates from the historical facts for dramatic purposes, which might displease some. Regardless, a clearer focus might have helped lift the film, particularly in its later scenes.

Still, THE DANISH GIRL is a visually beautiful film, with fine, moving performances and a little-known historical story, which will make it a winner for its story of transcendent love.

THE DANISH GIRL opens in St. Louis on Friday, December 18th, 2015.

OVERALL RATING:  4 OUT OF 5 STARS

DGOneSheet(norating)1440701039

MACBETH (2015) – The Review

mac_l3a5282_lg

Michael Fassbender and Marion Cotillard deliver gripping performances in a dark, atmospheric and bloody MACBETH. While this dark, bloody film is powerful, this film should not be one’s first introduction to Shakespeare’s classic, as a significant amount of the play itself is missing. No boiling cauldron and “double, double toil and trouble” open this version of the Scottish play, although the three “weird sisters” appear after a battle with their prophetic pronouncements. It is more an updated interpretation than the definitive screen adaption but still a must-see for fans of the Bard, as well as a worthy addition to the film canon of his works.

Brooding, bloody and filled with ghosts, director Justin Kurzel’s MACBETH takes place in a ruggedly beautiful landscape, creating a film that is visually striking. As the film unfolds, the screen often suffused with red, and landscapes take on increasingly darker tones. Battle scenes, reveling in muddy and blood in a way that recalls BRAVEHEART, and memories of battle figure heavily in this version, set in foggy Scottish moors and a mountainous, windswept landscape.

The script by Jacob Koskoff, Todd Louiso and Michael Lesslie captures the gritty violence in the tragedy thoroughly but the opening cauldron scene is not the only familiar one left out or significantly changed, making this a film more based on the play than a more pure film version. The film focuses most strongly on scenes with MacBeth himself, played powerfully by Fassbender. More than anything, this is Fassbender’s film. MacBeth’s own ambition figures more heavily in driving events than magic from the three witches or influence from politically-scheming allies or even Lady MacBeth. Still, the scenes between Fassbender and Cotillard are gripping, fiery stuff, and Cotillard in particular delivers a riveting performance.

A brief screen of text at the start sets the stage for the story, and replaces some information from missing scenes. It tells us how General MacBeth (Fassbender), Thane of Glamis, leads the army of the beleaguered King Duncan (David Thewlis) against rebellious forces in a last-stand battle and emerges with a surprise victory. The overjoyed king comes to visit his general, bestowing on MacBeth the title Thane of Cawdor, fulfilling the witches’ prophecy that MacBeth and his ally and kinsman Banquo (Paddy Considine), who also predict MacBeth will be king and, MacBeth being childless, Banquo’s descendents there after.

In this dark film, dead children are a reoccurring presence. The films opens with a Highland funeral, with blond-haired toddler on a pyre and the couple mourning, presumably, the death of their child. Shakespeare’s play presents the couple as childless but makes clear that Lady MacBeth has given birth to at least one, in the chilling speech in which she urges on to carry through in their plan to kill King Duncan. There is another child who figures heavily, a teen boy lost in battle. Both children return as visions, in some of the most haunting scenes of the film.

Among the most dramatically striking scenes is one between MacBeth and Lady MacBeth, shortly after they have been crowned king and queen. In their high-vaulted royal bedroom, MacBeth speaks in threatening manner to his wife about their childless state, a startlingly different interpretation of the scene. Both Fassbender and Cotillard are electrifying in this scene. Fassbender frequently is praised for his outstanding work, even in lesser films, but hopefully this complex, moving performance will give Cotillard more of the recognition she deserves. Her final scene is presented in an even more unusual fashion but she brings layers of despair and loss to the scene that adds immensely to its power.

While the acting is marvelous, the missing scenes and frequent dream-like sequences of ghosts and battlefields gives the film a kind of fitful feel, rather than one of sustained drama. Still, one cannot fault the outstanding cinematic style of this MACBETH, which succeeds admirably in creating mood. While its truncated version means it should be no one’s introduction to the play, this re-imagining offers some powerful scenes and dramatically gripping performances, making it worth the trip to the theater.

MACBETH opens in St. Louis on Friday, December 11th, 2015.

OVERALL RATING:  4 OUT OF 5 STARS

12039674_1022822701091257_725077738339978760_n

CHI-RAQ – The Review

CR_D06_00618.CR2
Photo credit: Parrish Lewis, Courtesy of Roadside Attractions and Amazon Studios

Spike Lee’s CHI-RAQ re-imagines Aristophanes’ ancient Greek comedy “Lystrata” as modern plea for peace in violence-torn Chicago. Chi-Raq is a term the director reportedly heard on the streets, used to compare violence-racked Chicago neighborhoods to war-torn Iraq. In the classic Greek play, the women on both sides of warring Sparta and Troy join together to end the war by staging a sex boycott. No sex for the men until there is no war. In CHI-RAQ, the Spartans and the Trojans are opposing gangs in a disadvantaged neighborhood, where their violent warfare is killing children in the streets.

It is a clever idea, moving this ancient comedy to Chicago’s bloody streets, using humor, music, sex and truth-telling to put a spotlight on the situation in these disadvantaged city neighborhoods. Sometimes a person just has to speak out, even if nothing will change, and that is what Lee is doing  – expressing his views on  gun violence, the lack of economic opportunity, the lousy schools, and the other challenges facing these neighborhoods, all within an entertaining film.

The film is funny, angry, wildly imaginative and hard-hitting. It is not a perfect film but it is a moving one, fired by Spike Lee’s passion to get people to do the right thing. It may be among the director’s best, even if success for its mission seems remote.

The director tells the story through rap, with much of the dialog in rhyme and sprinkled with some terrific musical numbers. The film uses dark, raw, biting humor and a sarcastic, truth-telling tone. There is nothing subtle about Lee’s film. He starts out with a hip-hop song about Chi-Raq, with the lyrics in large letters on screen, in case you might miss some. When the song ends, the word emergency in giant red letters flashes on screen while a voice urgently repeats the word. The film then moves to a club where a hip-hop artist named Chi-Raq (Nick Cannon) is performing the song in front of a packed house – until gunfire breaks out.

Although he denies it, Chi-Raq is associated with the Spartan gang. The Trojans are led by Cyclops (Wesley Snipes), a one-eyed tough guy. Chi-Raq tells his lady Lysistrata (Teyonah Parris) he is a musician, not a gang member, but that is not the way Cyclops sees it. When an 11-year-old girl is shot in the street in the middle of the day and no one arrested, Lysistrata organizes the women, including Cyclops’ wife Irene (Jennifer Hudson), to stop the war by staging a “sex strike” – no peace, no nookie (although the director uses a more graphic term).

The same boycott was used in Africa recently, when the women of Liberia organized a sex strike that ended their civil war. Lee makes reference to that real-world event in the film, although neighborhood wise woman Miss Helen (Angela Bassett) is clearly aware of the theatrical/historical roots. Lee has assembled a stellar cast, which also includes a wonderfully sly Samuel L. Jackson as narrator Dolmedes, who provides biting, sarcastic commentary, and John Cusack as a priest who grew up nearby and returned to lead a black church standing up to the violence. If there is a flaw in that cast, it is that it could use a few more young stars to connect more with a younger audience.

The film is clearly Spike Lee speaking out and hoping to do something to stop the violence racking city neighborhoods in Chicago, Philadelphia and Baltimore, all mentioned in the film. The director makes gun violence a center of his commentary, with gun-profiteers crossing state lines to buy them at gun shows, to evade Chicago’s strict gun laws, and selling them on the street. But he says more, with characters or the narrator commenting on neglected neighborhoods, places gripped with fear of gangs who do not care about innocent life lost as “collateral damage,” and police equipped with military surplus coming out in force to stop a protest but absent and ineffective when a little girl is shot. In one chilling bit of dialog, the narrator notes their children go from “third-rate schools to first-rate prisons,” and “now they are privatized, so it is profitable too.”

At the same time, it is clear Lee sees that chances of success, that the film will prompt real change, are not good. In one scene, Cusack delivers a fiery sermon to his congregation, listing the range of problems racking the neighborhood including the code of silence that protects the guilty, but we also notice he is “preaching to the choir.” In a classic Western, the people in the packed church, whipped into a frenzy of outrage, would pour out of the church and go get the bad guys. Instead, they simply go home. Lee is too good a filmmaker for that not to be a conscious reference. Near the film’s end, the sex boycott has spread around the world, and multinational companies promise jobs for the people in the neighborhood – and not minimum wage jobs. That seems a bit of highly unlikely wish-fulfillment on the director’s part, as well as a dig at those who could do more.

CHI-RAQ is powerful, even heart-breaking stuff wrapped in a dark, hip-hop musical comedy. Even if it seems unlikely to actually change anything, at least Spike Lee had his say.

CHI-RAQ opens in theaters on Friday, December 4th, 2015.

OVERALL RATING:  4 OUT OF 5 STARS

CHIRAQ_PAYOFF_FINISH_ONLINE1447368906