‘New Moon’ trailer already proving a disappointment!

twilightnewmoontrailer

Ouch! I’m sure it’s no surprise that I hated ‘Twilight’ and no, I still haven’t read the books (and won’t) but, believe it or not the one and only thing I found interesting about the first movie also was the one and only thing that I was sort of looking forward to in ‘New Moon’. That one thing being the Native American werewolf folklore storyline. Well, so much for that… at least so much for it “looking” cool anyway. I watched the trailer for ‘New Moon’ and the thoughts going through my mind went something like this…

Ooooh… pretty aerial view of the coast – oh, wait… now the sappy stuff starts. Wait a minute! She’s dating a vampire and ALL she wants from him for her birthday is a kiss? Bullsh**! Oh, whoa! Now this is even more 90210-ish than ‘Twilight’… not good. It’s gonna score big with the book-reading lady crowd though. Oh my God, no! She got a paper cut! The tension is terrifying! Go, Edward! Protect her finger at all costs. That’s the finger she presses send on her cell phone with. OK, he’s officially been effed up. Whew! That was close. Uh oh, looks like someone’s breaking up. So, sad… Oh, crap! Hang on, isn’t that the “not-so-mean” Jamaican vampire from the gang in ‘Twilight’ that helped them? Maybe I’m confused. Ooh, boy, oh boy-o-boy! Now comes the cool Native American werewolf ass-kicking… WTF? Those special FX are crap! I am so disappointed. I want to see it even less now.

International Trailer for ‘New Town Killers’

newtownkillersmovie

So, I came upon this trailer for a new film from the UK called ‘New Town Killers’ and upon viewing have become stuck with mixed feelings about the movie. The film is written and directed by Scottish filmmaker Richard Jobson (A Woman in Winter) whose previous films haven’t held much punch with users of IMDB, however this one already has a respectable 7.3 out of 10 rating from 29 votes. Regarding my impression of the film itself, from the trailer, it looks like a potentially kind of cool movie, but the story just seems like another take on the whole ‘Hard target’ and ‘Surviving the Game’ story concept, which has been done to death. I’m curious… any readers from the UK/Europe out there that have seen this during one of it’s festival runs? Is it good, bad or just kind of… eh?

Tony Scott Confirms New ‘Alien’ as a Prequel

alien-queen

“Yes, Carl Rinsch is going to do the prequel to Alien.”

That’s about all we need to hear.  Tony Scott confirmed the news to Collider at the press junket for his next film, ‘The Taking of Pelham 123.’  Collider also broached the subject of 20th Century Fox’s streak of not being “artist friendly” as they put it.  Scott had this as a response:

“Yes!  But Fox is our home.  They finance our production company.”

That’s not exactly a statement of comfort.  Fox hasn’t had the best track record of late when it came to going back and revitalizing franchises.  The ‘Alien Vs. Predator’ series has been a moderate trainwreck to put it lightly.  Many felt the company completely dropped the ball on the ‘Die Hard’ comeback.

Of course, when you think about it, the ‘Alien Vs. Predator’ films were prequels in of themselves.  This could mean this new ‘Alien’ film is a continuation of ‘AVP: Requiem.’  We may be finding out before the end of the year.  Scott confirmed they plan on going in front of the camera before 2009 comes to a close.

Source: Collider

Good For a Laugh… ‘Razortooth’ Red Band Trailer

razortoothmovie

Here’s something good for a laugh… Say hello to ‘Razortooth’, the newest giant killer animal flick to hit DVD. The film takes place in a swamp where locals are being terrorized by some giant snake-like, swamp-dwelling creature with a mouthful a razor-sharp teeth. The creature appears to be some form of an eel, but it’s face is almost cute, in a giant killer creature kind of way. The film is marketed as being from the producer of ‘The Devils Rejects’ but, I’m not sure this film honors that credit. Check out this red band trailer for ‘Razortooth’… although, the only thing I could find in the trailer to warrant the “red band” notation is the shower scene. Watch the trailer and you’ll get my meaning…

Weekend Box Office: Raimi or PIXAR?

boxofficebattle

Last week saw the battle between Stiller and the T-800s, and Stiller and the inhabitants of the Smithsonian won out.   This weekend, the battle might not be such a toss-up.   Sam Raimi’s return to horror, ‘Drag Me to Hell,’ is going up against PIXAR’s latest, ‘Up.’

Everyone and their dog is saying ‘Up’ is going to come out on top of this one, and some are even claiming ‘Drag Me to Hell’ could come in third place this weekend behind ‘Night at the Museum.’   ‘Up’ opens on 3766 screens and ‘Drag Me to Hell’ bows on 2508 screens, so the gap on those numbers are pretty wide.   PIXAR has a pretty good history with opening numbers.   The only PIXAR film since the first ‘Toy Story’ to open with less than $57 million was ‘Rataouille’ in 2007.   Even that one opened with $47 million.   The chances of ‘Up’ doing worse are slim to absolutely none, and slim just left town.

If you’re looking at Sam Raimi opening weekend numbers, you kind of have to look outside the ‘Spider-Man’ bubble.   ‘Spider-Man’ was a brand unto itself, and Raimi’s name really didn’t have much bearing on those opening numbers.   Outside of the ‘Spider-Man’ movies, the best opening Raimi has had was just over $13 million for ‘For Love of the Game.’   Even that movie didn’t draw much on the Raimi name, since it wasn’t much of a Raimi film.   Nonetheless, ‘Drag Me to Hell’ and its marketing of plastering Raimi’s name all over the posters and commercials should help it pull in some decent numbers.   The fact that it is getting glowing reviews from all over won’t hurt, either.

If we’re talking Ben Stiller and second weekend numbers, you might be impressed, as well.   The second weekend take for the original ‘Night at the Museum’ were, actually, up from the first weekend.   This was the last weekend in December, so don’t expect to see the same thing happen here.   However, the big battle this weekend could be for second place between ‘Drag Me to Hell’ and ‘Night at the Museum 2.’

What do you think?   Drop us a comment or two below with your takes on this upcoming weekend and its box office?   ‘Up’ will surely be number one.   How much will it rake in?   Will ‘Drag Me to Hell’ come up at number two, or will ‘Night at the Museum’ shine once again?   How much of a dropoff do you see ‘Terminator Salvation’ having?   Speaking of, is it too early to consider ‘Terminator Salvation’ the first, box-office bomb of the Summer?

Here’s the way I see the weekend breaking down:

  • ‘Up’ – $65 million
  • ‘Drag Me to Hell’ – $31 million
  • ‘Night at the Museum 2’ – $30 million
  • ‘Terminator Salvation’ -$18 million
  • ‘Star Trek’ – $15 million

Give out your numbers in the comments section below!

‘Reaper’ Season Finale: ‘The Devil and Sam Oliver’

Now let's see Daniel Webster play quarters.

I have to say after watching the season finale of Reaper I must admit I can see this show going on for at least two more seasons. It would almost seem, with where they left it off, that they’ve opened up a whole new can of worms and practically have a whole new story line they can explore. And with the way, I’m pretty sure, they want to go with it it’s definitely going to need more than the one season that I thought is all they needed to get everything done and wrapped up. There’s just so much they brought into the last ten minutes of the finale that really just changed everything.

But let me say if it does get picked up for another season and somehow does stay on The CW than it really needs to learn how to push this show. First off the commercials they had for this show were terrible and if you weren’t familiar with the show and how good it was the commercials might’ve turned you off because they made the show seem a bit weirder than it actually was, if that’s possible.
Also the pairing up of it with 90210 on the same night was the worst idea ever. Nobody watching 90210 is going to be the same audience that would dig Reaper. As I believe one commenter, thank you Heath, pointed out, that new show The Vampire Diaries would be a nice show to pair it up with.

As for the season finale I couldn’t have been happier with the way they went with it in almost all respects. They had the capturing of the soul and luckily it was one where the soul didn’t matter so much and they caught him in the first five minutes, of course not before the Devil made Sam dance like a monkey in honor of the passing of the Devil’s favorite street performer. Also what they did with the continued relationship of Ben and Nina was good and decently tensioned filled as his grandmother yet again tries to butt into his relationship but this time almost with extreme force as she brings a priest in to perform an exorcism on a special someone. I loved what they did with Sock here and how he’s racing to stop it but gets a little distracted thanks to what was crawling around in his slurpy.

And then we’ve got what we all came to see and that is the match up between Sam and the Devil and the quarters match for Sam’s soul. I thought what they did with this was pretty ingenious and that’s why I thought they may be able to finish everything off in this last episode but man was I wrong. I thought there was a chance he might be able to win his soul back all nice and clean but the way they are able to drag out through the whole episode with different twists and turns and extra souls being offered up, it was done very well. The guest appearance by Michael Ian Black as the former demon now close to being angel Steve was hilarious and actually used very well. Instead of him coming in for a few scenes and a few jokes he’s used very well throughout this episode.

Well now that’s it all over and done with we can only hope some station is willing to take a gamble on this show and let it ride out the story it has left. I don’t know why it couldn’t move to cable and do fine. Most of those shows don’t expect to get huge ratings and I think with the ratings it’s currently delivering it’d be alright. I have heard talks that ABC Studios is in negotiations to possibly put the show into syndication and would air on Sunday nights on The CW which has given the air time over to the affiliates so really that seems to be the last hope we for this show at the moment. Of course several issues have risen up there with the producers leaving the show and Tyler Labine (Sock) already being in another show on Fox next season and if it was in syndication it would have less money to work with but I think it might still have a fighting chance here.

‘Toy Story 3’ Teaser Online!

toy-story-3

We had it on good authority it would be in front of ‘Up’ in theaters today, but, now, we have confirmation that the teaser for ‘Toy Story 3’ is playing in front of PIXAR’s latest film.   You can see the trailer in theaters all across America in 3D.   However, if you just can’t wait, or, like us movie critics, you don’t get trailers in front of your movies, you can check out the teaser online right now.   It’s in 2D, but it’s no less fun.

Of course, being just a teaser, don’t expect any, actual footage from the film.   Regardless, this is still better than your typical, logo only teaser we get from time to time.

‘Toy Story 3’ comes out on June 18th, 2010.

Fantasy Cast… Who should play Ernst Stavro Blofeld?

fantasycast

It wasn’t long ago we asked for your opinions on who should play Captain Kirk’s arch nemesis, Kahn, should that character ever be introduced into JJ Abrams’ ‘Star Trek’ universe.  This week, we pose a similar question.

Who should play Blofeld?

blofeld

As the archenemy of one special agent 007, James Bond, Ernst Stavro Blofeld appeared in three Ian Fleming novels and seven films.  Those seven films included six official films and the 1983 knockoff remake of ‘Thunderball,’ ‘Never Say Never Again.’  His appearance has changed slightly with each incarnation, but he is generally remembered as having a bald head and always carressing a white, Persian cat.

Blofeld, also referred to as Number 1, is the leader of SPECTRE (Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion).  This secret, evil organization has, for the newer, Daniel Craig, Bond films into Quantum.  Of course, just because the name of the organization is different doesn’t mean Blofeld can’t, possibly show up as one of its highest members.

So, we pose the question again.  Who should play Ernst Stavro Blofeld?  With his different appearances through the history of the Bond film, it really could be anyone filling in.  Of course, with the way the new Bond franchise is headed, the idea of him having a shaved head and stroking a Persian cat might go out the window.  However, the actor who portrays this character should be someone with some depth, some amount of respect behind them.

It would be somewhat of a coup, but it might be interesting to see Max Von Sydow play the character, as he did in ‘Never Say Never Again.’

71940545SJ001_San_Sebastian

Granted, the guy is 80, but he’s still churning out amazing performances just as he did 40 years ago.

If, however, you wanted to go younger but still pull in the same level of acting, the first name that comes to mind is Gary Oldman.

gary-oldman1

Of course, Oldman seems to be the go-to guy for just about any role any more.   The guy can literally play anything under the sun.

So, now, we leave it in your hands.   Who do you think should play Blofeld if that character is ever brought into the new James Bond series?   Would you even have the character show up?   What other famous, Bond villains would you like to see make appearances in this new direction the franchise is taking?   Shoot us your suggestions for this fantasy cast in the comments section below.

And, if you have any ideas for future Fantasy Casts, shoot us an email with your ideas. You can find all of our email addresses right here!

Review: ‘Up’

up-pixar

When you think about it, it has to be a difficult challenge to move your audience with animated characters.  The emotional distance created by not using live action character is something animators have worked to bridge for decades.  Judging from the genres that have come out of the animated world in this span of time, it seems it is easiest to make someone laugh with an animated character.

Evidently, it is very difficult to move someone to tears with an animated film.  ‘Grave of the Fireflies’ was able to do it, but that story was designed to tugg at the heartstrings.  Miyazaki is a master at emitting a certain level of emotion withi his animated characters, but I wouldn’t say any of them would move the viewer to tears.

Picture perfect PIXAR.  That’s really what they should change the name of their company to, because, with ‘Up,’ they do something seemingly effortlessly that has never been done before.  They project an emotion based on their characters alone that has, to my knowledge, never been topped or even matched before.

With 78-year-old Carl Fredericksen, PIXAR has a central character who can elicit emotional responses that range from one end of the spectrum (laughter) to the other (tears).  And, with Pete Docter (‘Monsters, Inc.’) and Bob Peterson (‘Finding Nemo’) at the helm, the film isn’t satisfied with just telling you about Carl.  They show you.

When we are introduced to Carl, he is a child sitting in a 1930s movie theater, watching news reels about famed explorer Charles Muntz who is venturing to South America to discover an elusive, giant bird.  As a child, Carl is a lover of all things adventure, and he finds his lifemate in Ellie, a slightly older girl who also has a passion for adventure.  The two quickly fall in love, and, in an opening montage that ranks up there with the very best, we witness their life together.  They are dreamers, and they desire to run off to South America to be adventurers, as well.  Unfortunately, as is often the case, life intervenes.  Before they can go off on the adventures they had always dreamed of, the couple find themselves aged, and their dreams have fallen behind.  Before too long, Carl finds himself alone.

As an aged widower, Carl becomes a recluse.  City planners are building office buildings around the home he and Ellie made for themselves.  Just as the retirement home is coming to take Carl away, he decides it is time to make his and Ellie’s dreams a reality.  Tying thousands of helium balloons to his house, he lifts off the ground and sets sail for South America.  Of course, nothing ever goes as planned, and Carl soon realizes he is not alone.  An 8-year-old wilderness explorer named Russell is also on board.  The two quickly find themselves in the middle of the adventure Carl had always dream of.

After ‘Up’s emotionally moving opening sequences, the thought of a man tying thousands of helium balloons to his home in order to lift it off the ground takes you aback a little bit.  It is a pretty major change in emotional and logical direction the film takes.  The early moments featuring Carl and Russell in the floating house are, no pun intended, the low points of ‘Up.’  Fortunately, this film isn’t all about the two in the house as they float towards South America.  There are a few moments aboard the house, but, for the post part, ‘Up’ is about the adventure the duo gets into after they find themselves in South America.

‘Up’ is a film that, through and through, is the perfect Summer movie.  It truly has everything you might want.  There is drama.  There is comedy.  There is a grand sense of adventure.  Docter and Peterson, as well as the top-notch animators at PIXAR, truly outdo themselves in every department imaginable.

And, not only does ‘Up’ have all of these elements, it pulls every one of them off brilliantly.  The comedy in ‘Up’ is amazing.  Even certain moments that, on the surface, seem cheap and easy turn ingenious by unpredictable out comes.  There is a pack of guard dogs Carl and Russell come across who are all wearing bark-to-English translators around their necks.  The leader of the dogs is a Doberman Pinscher whose translator is malfunctioning, and the effects on the dogs voice are hilarious, even if you know where the joke is going long before it shows up.

The level of adventure found in ‘Up’ is off the chart, and this is a combination of everything.  The story is such that you care about every character.  The voice acting (Ed Asner as Carl was an inspired choice) solidifies the embodied nature the animators began with the characters.  The lush environment the PIXAR animators put these characters in is breathtaking, oftentimes more beautiful than anything found in the real world.  Docter and Peterson’s direction of the action is superb, never allowing the film to rest for one moment.  Even in the scenes where there is no action, when Carl and Russell are merely trudging through the South American jungle, there is an intensity that is often missing from such, animated features.

PIXAR has always been know for mixing heart and comedy into their films with immaculate results, but this combination has never reached the level found in ‘Up.’  It may not be PIXAR’s best film, and there are, indeed, moments early in Carl’s adventure that don’t quite work as well as others.  Regardless, ‘Up’ is yet another glowing example of the level of work going on at PIXAR.  What’s more, they appear to be doing it with a minimal amount of effort.

Overall: 4.5 out of 5

Review: ‘Drag Me to Hell’

dmth

I love you, Sam!

‘Drag Me to Hell’ marks director Sam Raimi’s return to horror-comedy and does so with much twisted joy. Raimi hasn’t made a film of this type since ‘Army of Darkness’ in 1992. Sure he made ‘The Gift’ in 2000, but that was more of a straight psychological horror. ‘Drag Me to Hell’ is firmly planted in his natural element, featuring Raimi’s full-bodied comedy with strong earthy undertones of horror that culminates in a wonderfully evil finish.

Raimi’s sense of humor is unmistakable as he clearly still derives his inspiration from his trifecta of muses, The Three Stooges. While there is a great deal of generally funny bits that counter-balance the scares in this movie, there are also a slew of inside jokes and references making this a kind of Raimi encyclopedia of cinema style. What makes these moments even more enjoyable, is that you instantly know who is a member of the Sam Raimi fanboy club because only a select scattered laughs echo throughout the theater as the general audience wonders what was so funny.

The story follows Christine Brown (Alison Lohman) as she attempts to secure an assistant manager promotion at her bank by proving she can “make the tough decisions” but unfortunately chooses the wrong customer to cut her teeth on. Lorna Raver plays Mrs. Ganush, the old woman whom Christine refuses an extension on her mortgage, ultimately resulting in the old woman’s placing a curse on Christine which gives her three days before a dark spirit called the Lamia comes to collect her soul, or as the title implies, drags her to Hell.

‘Drag Me to Hell’ has a few jump-in-your-seat scares, but is mostly a fun thrill ride with dark humor. The one major “scary” scene occurs upon the old woman’s first attempt at revenge against Christine while in the parking garage. Aside from this, the movie is primarily a comedy of the less traditional sort. Justin Long plays Christine’s boyfriend Clay, giving a decent performance with his share of comedic moments, but is definitely a supporting character as this movie is all about Christine Brown.

For the true Raimi-ites out there, be happy and reassured to know that “the classic” returns for it’s usual cameo, however appears with much more frequency in this film than is custom. For those of you not in the know, “the classic” is Raimi’s yellow 1973 Oldsmobile Delta 88 that he makes a point to include on screen in every one of his movies. In addition to “the classic” Sam’s brother Ted also makes his usual cameo appearance, but I’ll let you figure out where he shows up. We’ll call it a pop quiz to see if you were paying attention.

Overall, ‘Drag me to Hell’ is an enjoyable romp through what is likely a semi-working vacation for Raimi before diving back into the ‘Spider-Man’ franchise. Allegedly, Sam and his brother Ivan (who write almost everything together) originally wrote the screenplay for ‘Drag Me to Hell’ upon completing ‘Army of Darkness’ but was put aside in favor of other projects. So, theoretically, this was a movie 17 years in the making.

Much of the plot is fairly predictable and the CGI isn’t the greatest in parts, but the film isn’t about the mystery or the glitz. ‘Drag Me to Hell’ is all about having a good time watching Raimi indulge his cinematic inner child once more amidst an era of bigger fish he gets to fry.