We Are Movie Geeks All things movies… as noted by geeks.

January 12, 2018

THE POST – Review

(Left to right) Tom Hanks (Ben Bradlee), David Cross (Howard Simons), John Rue (Gene Patterson), Bob Odenkirk (Ben Bagdikian), Jessie Mueller (Judith Martin), and Philip Casnoff (Chalmers Roberts) in Twentieth Century Fox’s THE POST. Photo Credit: Niko Tavernise.

In THE POST, director Steven Spielberg delivers a remarkable and timely film about freedom of the press, a story set in 1971 that has striking echoes for the present. President Nixon, who disdains the press, seeks to prevent publication of embarrassing secret government documents that expose decades of deceit of the American people on the Vietnam War.

Spielberg structures THE POST like a thriller, racing a ticking-clock and filled with intrigue. The director has put together a stellar cast for this top-notch thriller, led by Tom Hanks as Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee and Meryl Streep as the paper’s publisher Katharine Graham, the first women publisher of a major daily newspaper. Known as the Pentagon Papers, a portion of this trove of documents has already been published by the New York Times, but that paper has been stopped by a court order. When the documents come to Graham and Bradlee, they are faced with the choice: publish and risk the paper, maybe even jail, or let the President silence the free press and conceal the facts from the American people.

Comparisons to ALL THE PRESIDENTS MEN is inevitable, and this is a worthy film to pair with that classic, but this is the story that preceded Watergate, and without which Watergate would not have happened. But this gripping fast-paced thriller also has elements in common with THE FRONT PAGE and other classic newspaper tales.

The First Amendment is not the only focus on this excellent, intelligent drama, which is one of the year’s best, but spotlights the challenges faced by publisher Katherine Graham, in the patriarchal 1970s, after she inherited the newspaper once owned by her father and then run by her late husband.

Streep is wonderful as Graham, who is determined to keep the paper her father built going and vital. She is always determined to do that but her demeanor seems to say otherwise, typical of a woman of her era. She starts out hesitant to challenge the condescension often shown by men who are supposed to advise her but increasingly finds steel to do so, in one scene reminding Robert McNamara that she is seeking his advice, not his permission.

 

The one exception is Bradlee. Hanks’ Bradlee is gruff and blunt in his dealings with everyone, including his boss Graham, and a sharp contrast to her diplomatic style of speech. But in the end, he always recognizes that it is her decision to publish or not. Bradlee is the bulldog pursing this story, a scoop that could put the paper on the map nationally, and clearly enjoys the fray. His scenes are built around this pursuit, which unfold with the urgency and excitement of a spy or political thriller.

The film is packed with the giant figures, good and bad, of this historic moment, when the press stood up for the people’s right to know in the face of a hostile government, eager to keep embarrassing truths hidden. The clip of Nixon speaking about the Pentagon Papers is Nixon’s actual voice, which adds to the drama and realism. Scenes of the running press add both a sense of the time period and twinge of nostalgia for an era of paper and ink.

The whole ensemble cast is wonderful, as is the pacing and photography, particularly the evocative images of rolling presses. Modern audiences may be taken aback at the easy sexism that Streep’s Graham faces in nearly every scene, and impressed with the easy grace with which she handles it. The scenes between Streep as the elegant Graham and Hanks as the hard-nosed Bradlee as pure acting gold, but the whole film is sprinkled with such gems.

THE POST is one of the best films of the past year, an essential must-see, and a worthy companion piece to ALL THE KINGS MEN on the free press, but this gripping thriller has as much to say about present days as the historical moment in which it is set.

RATING: 5 out of 5 stars

April 2, 2010

Review: THE MOST DANGEROUS MAN IN AMERICA

How much trust do we put in our elected officials? How far-reaching, how blatant are the lies that the government tells us, reaching all the way up the ladder to the big man in the oval office? Daniel Ellsberg discovered the answers to these questions first hand during his time working with the Rand Corporation in collaboration with Robert McNamara and the U.S. government during the Vietnam War. This was a devastating revelation that ultimately shifted his views and his life, resulting in a shift in the interpretation of the First Amendment in relation to the publication of classified documents in the media.

Is this all a bit much to take in? Well, THE MOST DANGEROUS MAN IN AMERICA: DANIEL ELLSBERG AND THE PENTAGON PAPERS is the kind of documentary that can present enough information to make your head spin, or to inform and awaken audiences to the underbelly of American history. Its a film that delves into the darker, unspoken areas that we never read about in school textbooks. Directors Judith Ehrlich and Rick Goldsmith have put together a fine piece of filmmaking, detailing a side of the Vietnam War that is still unfolding in the public view.

Not since Errol Morris’ THE FOG OF WAR have I seen a documentary so engaging and enlightening as to the truth in action of those in power, truth in the intentions kept behind closed doors and under lock and key. Through archival footage, interviews both present and historical, the filmmakers recount the controversial decision of Daniel Ellsberg to leak the 47 volumes, 7000 pages of top secret Pentagon documents to not one, but ultimately 17 major newspaper outlets as well as key members of Congress who held opposing objections to the Vietnam War and how it was handled, strategically and ethically.

Other films have been tremendously effective and moving in detailing and conveying the effects of the Vietnam War, both during and after, such as HEARTS AND MINDS, but few of these films have laid enough attention on the masterminds of the war that ultimately killed 58,000 American soldiers and over 2 million Vietnamese. Personally, I support the soldiers who fight for their country with honor, separate from the war itself, whichever war it may be. As we’ve come to realize most recently, not all wars are right and just in their purpose and methods. What this film does with great respect to all parties involved is to expose those responsible and their actions, which resulted in a cascading ripple effect, dominoes that continued to fall from the force of their predecessors, beginning with JFK through the Lyndon Johnson years and ending with Richard Nixon.

Daniel Ellsberg narrates the film himself, giving a sense of sincerity to the narration, a sense of real human emotion that would be difficult to convey using anyone other than the man who experienced the very accounts he is unveiling, Through the course of the film, Ellsburg wanders eloquently from nostalgia to sickening realization, fondness of a time when he truly felt he was doing good in supporting a cause for democratic security in Vietnam to his later years when all those feelings of righteousness were shattered. The sadness, the regret and the horror in his voice are as apparent as the certainty that his renewed efforts against war have fully become embedded in his life.

The film doesn’t bore the audience by going into great detail regarding the contents of the many documents, instead focusing on the many different people involved in the story, their reactions and recollections and the process and outcomes of the legal and moral choices made by Ellsberg and others. This is an example of a film that gives just enough information to be informative, inspiring those with interest of conscience to research further on their own without overwhelming the average audience and bogging itself down with statistics, facts and bias rants about how one side is more or less right or wrong than the other. THE MOST DANGEROUS MAN is a film about one man’s personal story of David defeating Goliath, enveloped in all the social, political and legal entanglements that come along for the ride, but the film never loses focus of it’s primary objective… doing what’s “right” in the face of adversity.

Overall Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

Powered by WordPress